Chủ Nhật, 23 tháng 12, 2018

Youtube daily report Dec 24 2018

Greetings fellow nerds.

I've been continuing to research the production of sodium these past couple of weeks using the alcohol catalyzed magnesium reduction approach.

We had a lot of problems but we worked through them.

Including trying to find a workable solvent, reaction times, processing methods in dioxane, preventing glassware destruction,

trying to dry the solvents using easy to obtain drying agents like aluminum and lithium metal.

Putting together our research into a mechanism.

And finally finding some very easy to obtain off the shelf catalysts like menthol, tetrahydrolinalool, dimetol and borneol.

Menthol in particular is a massive breakthrough in that it's extremely ubiquitous and this makes sodium production easy.

I can't emphasize how huge of a hurdle we've cleared by finding an off-the-shelf catalyst.

Now something i've been exploring is alternative solvents.

There are actually two solvents used in our sodium production process.

The reaction solvent that we actually perform the sodium production reaction in,

and the purification solvent where we separate sodium from the leftover magnesium as well as any bits of magnesium oxide.

For the reaction solvent we're currently using mineral oil or baby oil and to be honest, i don't think we're going to get much cheaper than that.

But maybe we can find a solvent that runs the reaction much faster.

A slightly higher expense would be justified in that case.

Now, for the purification solvent we're using dioxane.

Dioxane is easy to make for the amateur and we in fact did so ourselves in a previous video.

But because it's slightly carcinogenic it would be preferable to find an alternative.

Granted, substances like paint thinner and gasoline are probably even more carcinogenic, but still we want to try and reduce our exposure.

Anyway, it would be awesome if we could find a single solvent that does both.

Reaction and purification.

The reason why we can't use dioxane for the sodium production reaction is that the boiling point is too low.

We need to reach at least 160 celsius before the reaction even starts.

At 101 degrees celsius, the boiling point of dioxane is just not enough.

Higher pressure might work but the dangers aren't worth it for the amateur.

Anyway, a solvent i've been looking at is another essential oil, eucalyptol.

It's very easy to buy although it is somewhat expensive since we're using it as a solvent.

It has a nice high boiling point of 176 celsius.

While this is lower than our ideal temperature of 200 celsius, it should at least start.

What's most interesting is that it has a bridging ether group.

This makes eucalyptol a somewhat polar solvent and according to our mechanism,

most of the active species are polar so a polar solvent should speed up the reaction.

The ether group also makes eucalyptol an ethereal solvent similar to dioxane, so perhaps we can replicate the purifying properties as well.

Okay, enough talk, let's actually give it a try.

Now eucalyptol essential oil is not pure eucalyptol, it's usually just 80% or so eucalyptol.

So before we can do our testing we'll need to purify ourselves.

So to my 500mL of eucalyptol i'm adding in 10g of sodium metal.

Then i set up a reflux condenser and turned on stirring and heating to reflux.

What i'm doing is reacting the sodium with any impurities that can react with sodium.

If it reacts with sodium then we don't want it and if doesn't then it doesn't matter.

Now i know it seems circular to use sodium to purify a solvent with the intention of making sodium.

But right now we're just researching eucalyptol and if it does work, we can figure out alternative purification processes later.

Anyway, i left the eucalyptol to reflux overnight.

The next day i rearranged the apparatus to a distillation apparatus and distilled off the eucalyptol.

Anything that was destroyed by sodium would be left behind.

Now after i had distilled eucalyptol i decided to take a sample of 100mL and reflux it with 3g of sodium metal.

I wanted to see if there were any leftover impurities or if the eucalyptol itself slowly reacted with sodium.

You might not remember but several months ago when we began this project

it was determined that tetrahydronaphthalene could not be used as a solvent because it very slowly reacted with sodium to produce tar.

It was slow enough not to be noticed by myself or other amateurs during our early potassium work.

But was severely detrimental for making sodium.

Unfortunately after a few hours i started to see a color change.

Either there were impurities or eucalyptol was reacting.

So I refluxed the eucalyptol stock again over sodium overnight and again distilled it.

Once again i ran the test and again it was a failureů looks like the eucalyptol itself reacts with sodium.

This is not good.

But i noticed that the sodium still remained shiny rather than be covered with tar.

The side products of this decomposition seem to be different than with tetrahydronaphthalene.

While decomposition would certainly lower our sodium yield, maybe we can still use the solvent anyway.

So i decided to run the sodium production reaction anyway using a half-scale setup and a menthol catalyst.

I went through the drying and startup cycles as usual and interestingly enough i got successful hydrogen formation so it seemed like it was working.

Maybe eucalyptol is viable after all.

Now normally this would take around 30-40 hours to finish using a menthol catalyst.

But i noticed the reaction becoming very slow at just 14 hours.

Maybe most of it reacted.

But i waited until gas formation stopped completely at 24 hours to be certain.

After cooling i decanted the slurry and it looks like we got sodium.

This is the first working alternative solvent to mineral oil and it even works faster, completing the reaction in 14-24 hours.

This gives some evidence that a polar solvent helps to speed up the reaction

and we should look for that property in future alternative solvents.

Now looking at the sodium i can see that magnesium is still attached to it.

So as a purification solvent it doesn't seem to be working in situ.

But maybe the excessive amount of magnesium oxide by products was interfering.

So I added in fresh eucalyptol and refluxed it like i would with dioxane.

But after running it for four hours it was clear it wasn't working.

We can see the metal is still badly shaped indicating magnesium embedded in it.

I then added in dioxane this time and refluxed it and the magnesium separated out with the same efficiency as dioxane always provided.

I decanted off the sodium and we can see from the magnesium left behind that eucalyptol was not very effective if dioxane was able to remove this much.

So it's clear that eucalyptol fails as a purification solvent.

But we did learn something, the fact that an ethereal solvent fails to purify sodium means that ether functionality alone isn't enough.

Dioxane with its two ether groups might be special because it has chelating properties that eucalyptol does not have.

More testing will need to be done but we can start constructing a theory on that now that we have the eucalyptol results.

Anyway, as a reaction solvent, eucalyptol works very well and we even got 13.9g or about 94% yield.

So the decomposition must be happening very slowly.

But as a viable solvent for the amatuer i think eucalyptol isn't acceptable.

Without the crucial sodium purification property eucalyptol's only merit is that it's faster.

But considering how expensive it is and that we need to purify it first makes it less cost and labor effective than simply buying a better catalyst.

Nonetheless i still think these couple of weeks were time well-spent since the eucalyptol results help us learn more about the reaction conditions and mechanisms.

Anyway, thanks for watching.

Progress on the sodium project continues.

For more infomation >> Lab Notes - Eucalyptol Testing (Fail) - Dec 23, 2018 - Duration: 7:52.

-------------------------------------------

Podcasts Go Primetime As Hollywood Looks To Turn Listeners Into Viewers | NBC Nightly News - Duration: 2:20.

For more infomation >> Podcasts Go Primetime As Hollywood Looks To Turn Listeners Into Viewers | NBC Nightly News - Duration: 2:20.

-------------------------------------------

Porsche 911 GT3 RS by DRIVE Magazine [English subs] - Duration: 6:10.

Six-point harnesses aren't really necessary but they 're here to emphasize

that the GT3 RS is a true race car for the road.

It is the road car with the greatest suspension and aero adjustability.

The body is beautiful and wild, designed for max performance.

The front fenders incorporate large air vents above the arches,

which reduce air pressure around the wheels and improve downforce.

They are 25 mm wider than standard, perfectly matching the 911 Turbo-sourced rear fenders.

It has magnesium roof and carbonfibre front wings and front & rear bonnet.

Porsche's obsession for weight saving is quite clear. The carpet is now 5 kg lighter!

The 991.2 GT3 RS is lighter than 991.1, and it can get even lighter with the Weissach Package

which includes carbonfibre anti-roll bars(!),

carbon roof and magnesium wheels,

saving another 30 kg.

The engine is epic!

It is really advanced, obviously, but has an old-fashioned, raw feel.

In order to reach 9,000 rpm, hydraulic tappets are replaced with rocker arms & valve springs.

And you can hear it!

It sounds great; the exhaust is made of titanium.

Engine response is instant. The compression ratio is 13.3:1!

It produces 520 PS at 8,250 rpm, and 48 kgm at 6,000 rpm.

The sound is unbelievable. And it 's not just something you hear.

It's something you feel with your whole body.

A sense of rage, excitement, passion.

Even a sense of… irony, towards the current trend for electric motors and turbo engines.

What's it like on the road?

Sublime!

It corners amazingly, with unbelievably high levels of grip.

In normal driving you notice many annoying things.

The sound of stones hitting the floor, the sensitive steering, the suspension bounce.

But when you start pushing on, everything gels together.

Awesome brakes!

The new RS has larger front splitter, side skirts and rear spoiler

resulting in 144 kg of downforce at 200 km/h. And 400 kg at 300 km/h.

Aerodynamics is your Guardian Angel, you just know it's there for you.

Mechanical grip is even more impressive.

There are no silent blocks, just ball joints, giving unparalleled precision.

Steering is rich in information, and has a raw feel, like a racecar's.

Torque-vectoring and rear wheel steering make it really agile on turn-in.

It just points where you want it to.

But it's even more impressive on corner exit.

You have an electronic diff and an ultra-precise throttle, to handle the tail's attitude.

You rarely feel the back end overwhelming the front. It's much better balanced.

When electric performance cars become the norm,

Porsche will definitely have 'the car to beat' like it's always done with the 911.

In that sense, the GT3 RS is already outdated.

And this is what makes the driving experience it offers, even more unique.

For more infomation >> Porsche 911 GT3 RS by DRIVE Magazine [English subs] - Duration: 6:10.

-------------------------------------------

Box Office for Aquaman Opening Weekend, Mary Poppins Returns, Bumblebee - Duration: 14:21.

Hello and welcome to this week's Movie Math

For more infomation >> Box Office for Aquaman Opening Weekend, Mary Poppins Returns, Bumblebee - Duration: 14:21.

-------------------------------------------

卵なし簡単チョコレートムース・ケーキの作り方~ASMR cooking - Duration: 3:33.

For more infomation >> 卵なし簡単チョコレートムース・ケーキの作り方~ASMR cooking - Duration: 3:33.

-------------------------------------------

今日知情人爆料楊冪離婚內幕,那是真的吗?婆婆太過刁難,擺個桌布都要欺負楊冪! - 娛 樂 新 聞 - Duration: 4:12.

For more infomation >> 今日知情人爆料楊冪離婚內幕,那是真的吗?婆婆太過刁難,擺個桌布都要欺負楊冪! - 娛 樂 新 聞 - Duration: 4:12.

-------------------------------------------

Finishing A Screenplay and Getting It Ready For Market - Wendy Kram Full Interview - Duration: 2:05:28.

Film Courage: Wendy when did you begin LA4hire? Wendy Kram, Owner/Operator of Wendy's LA4hire: began la for hiring mm to eat and it was

I was thinking of at the time moving back to New York where I'm from and I

was having drinks with the girlfriend who works in media and she said you know

what it's 2008 the bank said I'll crash nobody was hiring and everyone was

cutting back and she said you know you should do consulting you're kind of like

you're like la for hire you know you know you've been in the business for

working in studios Disney's Sony universal you know the player is you

know how to navigate I think you'd be a very valuable resource for people

outside of you know the business and we're looking for connections and to

package projects and so on and it's like that sounds good and I was taking a

subway to where I was staying and by the time I got up out of the subway I had a

I was thought okay I'm starting a company called LA for hire consulting

and I envisioned my logo and I started brainstorming about the services that I

would offer and that's how I started this was a subway in LA Oh in New York

you're taking the LA metro yeah so what was your first step in starting it my

first step was talking to industry colleagues and saying what do you think

of this idea the notion was for production companies or producers who

might be you know not with studios and had material looking to you how do you

or if you're a screenwriter how do you get an agent how do you get if you don't

know people how can you get your material seen the fur production

companies that might be having cutbacks that they could hire freelance executive

someone who knows the players who knows how do you understand script development

who kids confident when it comes to working with writers and helping

implement notes if there's open writing assignments contacting the agents

telling them the nature of the project is discussing preparing writers list

directors lists and so it really be a conduit for companies that might not be

based in LA and might not have those relationships I think you'd said in

another interview that you know you'll have people come up to you on set when

you're working with one client and say you know what Wendy I like what you're

doing I'm I do this and I don't you know have a script but I normally am you know

a grip or something can you help me what are some of the things that people

normally have trouble with that aren't used to being sort of in the development

part right well I think the first thing is really knowing and understanding what

a good script is a lot of people will write a script and they may go through a

couple of drafts and I think that they they don't have a full understanding or

appreciation of what it really takes for an executive to decide that they want to

recommend it to their boss for producer to option material first studio to

decide to finance it and a lot of times there are really great ideas with

stories at the end of the day it's is it well executed it can there have been

times for myself as a producer where I've heard a concept and I say oh my god

this sounds amazing I want to option it then I read the script

and the characters are not particularly well-developed

the dialogue might be very what we often people will hear comment among

executives it's on the nose or it's expositional and it just then requires

too much development to get it to a place where it needs to be that it winds

up being a pass now unless it's based on source material

such as a graphic novel a book an article and sometimes you can use that

to sell a project without a script but it used to be for the tongue that I

started in developed about 20 years ago dating myself it was

easy to sell log lines I it would there was just much more financing of

development and because of the economic changes the studios are not financing

development at all the way they used to is that post 2008 or even even the post

2008 yeah yeah I think you said to in an article yeah I know you've written a lot

of fantastic articles on is it script magazine skirt magazines then writer's

digest writer's digest okay great so do

excellent sites about how there's different skill sets for above the line

versus below the line and they're both equally important but can we just define

what some of those skill sets are sure so above the line which is what I've

been involved with is finding the material so whether it's optioning a

true story life rights book original script and then getting it ready to

start making submissions identifying who the right buyers are understanding the

market knowing that Netflix and HBO and Showtime buy certain kinds of projects

worth where as NBC ABC CBS have different mandates and the and same with

future companies like Fox Searchlight is more akin to independent movies whereas

if you look at most of the studios doing they're doing tentpole movies or

franchise films you look at Disney where they're primarily doing you know Star

Wars the Marvel Universe and their own IP or crown jewels the classic fairy

tales and the so the above the line is taking the material and identifying the

right home the right buyers attaching directors actors

and assembling your crew the below-the-line are the nuts and bolts

people who make the movie happen people with you know the skills so whether it's

your boom operator editor a cinema photographer and they have a completely

different skill set which I I mean when I look at great Sena photographers or

any cinema photographer I'm amazed at how it really involves engineering and

artistry and it's beyond my comprehension really how they do it

so there's yeah different skill sets so we always hear every good entrepreneur

always ask the question to themselves what need am i filling a marketplace so

with LA for hire when you had that sort of epiphany moment on the subway what

what were you thinking the need is that you're feeling the deep definitely was I

found myself when I was a development executive I'd been started out as a

creative executive for a producer at Disney and then I worked at sand dollar

which I felt very fortunate to work there was one of the biggest management

companies in Hollywood and we had deals at Universal and Disney and I always

loved working with writers and their different executives that have different

strengths and I found that working with writers and helping them bring out their

best work was constantly feedback that I would get from the writers I was working

with and just loved that process so much and then when I was on my own in between

jobs and my friend had suggested why don't you do consulting and as it was I

I kept getting people coming to me for advice with their scripts and how to

make it better and so I just decided all right well let me turn this into a you

know a real business and the other need was definitely when I looked at

companies producers filmmakers all over the world that like I had a friend who

was a producer in Germany and he spoke English fluently and he asked me for

help on a project where he said I need to know how to talk to the agents and it

wasn't that he didn't speak English his English was perfect he said he felt like

he didn't know the right way to pitch things that kind of buzz words and so on

- you get taken seriously and so on so that's another thing I do it my company

I coach your emerging filmmakers or you can even be perfect existing

professionals how to improve the the way they present their material and I also

noticed many times that right on my pitch an idea and it doesn't sound that

interesting so I'll start asking questions and as I start to pull out

more information I go ah and then we put a different spin on it that can convey

the idea more strongly so a lot of times I feel that writers can undersell their

property they don't have the right kind of spin to communicate this is another

thing writers because they live with their characters have lived with their

characters for years and you know in the process of writing months they know

their characters so well that there sometimes is the unconscious feeling

that when they're writing something on the page or giving a logline that we're

going to know all the you know the the the the dots between are those the

connections between the dots so I think it's an important process for

writer producer to be able to find the best way to articulate their concept

obviously but because they might have a great idea in it they might not be

communicating in the best way possible the other thing is with companies let's

say in Europe is understanding who are the good names that really trigger

movies in terms of yeah actors is a lot of times people mention names and they

don't necessarily even if it's a wonderful actor who's well respected

they might not trigger the sale it might not be a name that's meaningful to a

Netflix or or is a Fox Searchlight and so on so that's one of the things that I

will know and the only reason why I will know is because I'm in constant contact

on a daily basis with people who know a lot more than me so it's not that I'm so

you know brilliant or you know that it's rocket science but it's being able to

have access I feel like every day I'm always learning more from people who are

more in the note than I am it's interesting what you say about

communication I know this is a little bit of a tangent I'm going off on but I

just read an article about managers and ones with high IQ versus ones with maybe

more of a normal IQ yeah and how the ones with a high IQ actually were more

off-putting and they didn't realize that about themselves hmm so it sounds like

with sometimes just the communication and it's not it's not maybe that they

were even coming across as will I know more it was just their communication

style it was different and so people couldn't relate to it so it sounds like

- is writers because they're so internal they don't rave you

they just need ya just how does a little bit of an objective you know point of

view because it is very internal you're living it's and I know for myself when

I'm working I also manage a few select writers and when I'm working with them

they'll often say okay I need a fresh set of eyes and if I've gone through

multiple drafts I'll get to a point where I'll say that you know I want to

give it show this to an industry colleague or let's you know get a reader

who I trust and let's get their their thoughts I think we all needed a certain

point an objective set of eyes to look at material and the balance of course is

being able to do that without losing yourself and your core

vision and I think one of the things you and I had talked about was the notion of

if like you're looking for a mentor is it good to have someone give critique of

your project or not I say absolutely but it should be a respected professional or

someone whose opinion you really respect it can be a friend who's quite

intelligent or has a good sense of story but the you know definitely don't

protect yourself by not asking someone who may not have your best interests at

heart and would just criticize to be critical sure sure and I actually want

to ask you more about that later in terms of also to someone that might be

too nice because they don't want to hurt your feelings right but it ends up

hurting you in the end just real quickly Wendy I mean I know why I love watching

writer q and A's I find writers fascinating what is it about writers

that interest you so much oh goodness I would say maybe from the time I was a

child I just loved stories as a way of immersing ourselves into another world I

think also any Penton problems we as human beings have or children when you

see another character going through something difficult there's an empathic

connection that you make and that you can vicariously experience what they're

going through a lot of times I think it can be therapeutic and healing and I

think that is the magic of great films as well as great literature there's it's

connecting to the the universal themes or what I mean Carl Jung talks about the

collective unconscious and that and I know there when a lot of people will

will speak about the importance of films that you can reach such a huge audience

that ranges you know ethnic cultural socio-economic a great case in point I

have many favorite movies I don't want to isolate this as my favorite of all

time but one of my favorite movies I felt was so powerful was a wrestler and

I said okay what does a upper-middle class you know young woman from New York

have in common with a wrestler I don't even watch the sport nothing but that

character's plight the way he was an outsider the way he had regrets the way

he wanted to fix some part of his past and mend his relationship with his with

his daughter was just so moving and so powerful I mean I found myself at the

end of the movie crying so I love that about movies and I love that writers can

create whether it's Aaron Sorkin he's such a master of dialogue - Guillermo

del Toro who can create such an extraordinary immersive world it's just

the magic of storytelling oh and I'd say we do really being able to if I carry

ously experience someone else I love the wrestler I want to watch that

night you reimburses does I want to rent it again yeah how does a writer know

that their screenplay is ready for market

is a very good question I think the first thing it's just really essential

that a writer submitted to colleagues for feedback and I mean I am a

professional in this field a lot of times I even though I am NOT a writer I

write treatments I work with writers on treatments and Bibles and so on and at a

certain point I'll go through multiple drafts I have a good built-in sense of

editing but at a certain point you know I might think

this is great and then I'll send it to a trusted colleague whether it's another

executive at a production company or a writer whose opinion I respect and

they'll come back and I don't know if they'll look money in my ass if I

couldn't say that but they'll come back with feedback and go you know the the

treatment really isn't getting interesting until page tip so I would

cut out the first page in a half and you know what it's so and it it's it makes

it better and there are so I think are times where

if it's someone who is opinion you know you need to really stay centered and on

point and I was something they definitely feel strongly about for

writers is that especially in the notes taking process because let's say a

writer sets up a project with a production company studio or network and

they give notes one of the worst things to do is to constantly be defending your

position and producers and executives will start to feel you know what life's

too short this person isn't receptive they're not fun to work with they're not

getting it they love it everything they're doing you know what I'm not

going to renew or we're going to replace the writer the best way for a writer to

be able to take notes is to be totally open and receptive and to try to hear

like what almost like with a second sense of what the executive is trying to

say so let's say they say let me just think of an example that I don't think a

character should you know say this line they sound kind of mean right here and I

don't feel and then the writer if you're listening rather than just defending it

you say oh that wasn't my attention I was i meant that he was being defensive

and a little bit sarcastic but he was kind of trying to be say it in a

charming way so then the executive would say okay

I get it now but that wasn't coming through so then the writer can see that

their intention wasn't coming across it that they would go back and tweak it a

bit so again I think it's very important to stay like you know true to your voice

and not just like roll over if someone says okay well we have a an 85 year old

protagonist um and she has dementia but I decided that I like everything else

about this story but let's turn her into a thirteen year old now

and believe it or not I have heard of situations not too far away from that as

a writer I think you need to defend your position and why it was essential to the

story that that character is was 85 with dementia that might not be the best

example but it's basically a balance between maintaining the integrity of

your vision because you can't just roll over for everything because then you

wind up with nothing and you compromise artistry and any kind

of creative vision that you have but anyway in terms of a writer knowing when

a project is ready I think that I hear a lot of writers when I'm working with

them they'll say well there's always going to be improvements to be made I

think when you are working with people whether it's a strong script consultant

development executive friend who's maybe a writer whose opinion you respect

development executive assistant to a producer assistant to a writer director

and so on someone who's really experienced with reading material and

knowing what Studios want that when it gets to a point where there's less and

less notes and the collective feeling is yeah there might be some work that still

needs to be done because there always will be but it's good enough and for me

the bar of what's good enough is the character that's that's a well-developed

that's really coming through even if there may be irascible or somewhat

unlikable that they we still can have empathy for that character if they're a

villain it's still good to have some empathy not always as important but for

your protagonist there's been a distinction between sympathy what they

might do doesn't have to be sympathetic but you should have a degree of empathy

for them and so I think it's it's really when you're when the feedback comes back

pretty consistently that this is good and you're not just looking for your

validation you have to be you know really open

I almost picture it like the kid in the class that finishes the test before

everybody else and walks out and everybody looks around like wow how'd

they finish that so fast can we take that same analogy with a new writer who

kind of says you know what I just want to get my work out there I don't really

need all these drafts I know this is good right you know it's possible

someone might be a savant of screenwriting and able to do it

every great screenwriter that I've seen and the ones who get the all the awards

they always say that it's taken them 30 40 drafts there is a top top one of the

most powerful show runners and telev in hit television history and she said and

this might be an obvious thing to say but she said you know a lot of people

say they want my life but they're not willing to put in the hours and the

blood sweat and tears I have another friend who's a top female showrunner and

I know that hours that she works and it's not a 40-hour week sometimes it's

an 80 hour week she's there's she loves her job

and she on weekends sometimes she'll be there till midnight on a Friday and

Saturday working you know eight to 12 hours and then the weekdays so

the I think you know look Mozart I think wrote his you know Compton amazing

compositions and he was somewhat of a savant so I think it is possible but I

think something that gets in the way is I understand the enthusiasm and

excitement to want to get your script out there but there can be may be either

naivete or hubris and I've noticed a lot there are times when the writers are

more and it could be the same with an actor that they're more focused on the

end result and I know for me as the producer and executive I'm focused on

the end result there's nothing I want more than a movie to get made it is the

greatest high after you've gone through all this work and seeing it come to

fruition and seeing the set designer create the sets and your actors you know

actually performing the lines and the scenes but if you look at every

wonderful writer director filmmaker actor the trajectory of their careers

they started out like doing little bit parts and movies that you never would

have thought they would wind up one day getting an Oscar so it's at each step is

a is a part of the process of the journey

he's just say whether they get someone like Kathryn Bigelow you know when she

started out or patty Jenkins for example when Cuddy did monster and I think she'd

gone to AFI she just kept doing good work these are people just kept doing

good work I don't think that you know patty Jenkins thought when she was at

AFI oh I'm gonna do an indie film called monster and get an Oscar for the leading

actress and I'm then gonna go and do Wonder Woman superhero and be the first

woman to woman to you know break all box office records as the director

barry jenkins when he did moonlight i don't think he was doing it because he

thought oh I'm gonna get an Oscar I think he wanted to he was compelled to

tell a story and he told it beautifully and it affected and resonated you know

with so many people so I think the most important thing for writers directors

actors is to stay committed to the craft and just doing the best work that you

can and surround yourself with people who can give you really constructive

feedback even if it's not always what you want to hear but to be open to

feedback that can be constructive and make you a better writer do you think

that's a factor of age do you think younger people really want to rush to it

or it's not about that it could vary in my experience it's not about that

because I know older writers who you know they filmed like times not on their

side so that they actually in some ways can be in more of a rush than younger

writers that's true yeah when you see a writer that you know that they do have

talent you can see that it just maybe needs a little more refining and you

need to slow them down what are some of the things that you do

first I don't like to ever feel that I'm in the position to like slow so I went

down most of what I do is just ask questions if in the script there are

there's a plot aspects or character behavior that's not clear to me or

confusing or inconsistent I'll just ask the question and I always tell the

writer that they never do feel compelled to agree with me it's not a dictatorial

thing but it is for the purpose of I feel I'm a pretty good barometer of what

other how other executives are are going to respond to material and if it's not

clear to me then there's a good chance that it might not be clear to someone

else so they don't have to I never feel like I want to impose something to be

done a certain way but I will raise a question or I'll say I feel that this

dialogue it and feel authentic to me it feels like

there's an agenda the writer has an agenda that you want the character to

say this but I think if we're really looking in the scene and a daughter is

responding to her mother how much she really respond and I'll ask the writer

to go back and kind of try and find the truth rather than the written agenda if

that makes sense so so I think it's really more about asking questions and

pointing out areas that can be improved rather than slow down I'm like if you

think it's ready to go and you're happy with and you don't agree then by all

means you should pursue that but I think a lot of times there can be a tendency

to take something out too hastily do you think people are aware of that

how damaging that can be because if they get consistent coverage it just kind of

like labels that one project or even their name it's not ready you're yeah

and I'm getting let's say oh yeah because here's the thing is so you have

a lot of people writers will be focused on networking which is great networking

is important let's say you meet someone it's a producer and they say quit send

me your script and it's not very good you have a frozen moment in time to have

that capture that person's attention and if they don't respond to it or they have

an assistant who reads it and says because a lot of times it is what

happens and says it wasn't very good the next time you want to get something in

they might not be as inclined to read your work you know tell them it's the

past we the the writing was just not up to snuff it was very amateurish the

person doesn't even know how to write a script to be honest there are certain

things that there is classic formatting but there's also certain telltale signs

such as if there's dialogue on the page that takes up half a page or almost the

whole page that's a telltale sign of with exception of course there are

always exceptions but that would be a sign that it's an

amateur if there's peaches in a script that are so dense that it looks like a

novel that would be another sign if there's like page after page of in very

dense descriptions that will wind up in and they recycled in or the trash in the

your computer so let's suppose I'm at a networking event or I get invited to a

great festival and it's a mixer so someone says hey so you write let may I

see your work and I know it's probably not ready what's the best way to let

them know that we're I'm not hurting their feelings really sure it's a great

question I would say that oh that's fantastic

can I get your card I'm I'm doing revisions and I'd love to send it to you

when it's ready oh so just like I drop you and you know can I drop you an email

as a reminder when it's ready sure that'd be great

oh great so you're not waiting a year for the revision you're keeping them in

your mind or in their mind sorry you're saying hi I met you you know and thanks

sadly and you know what it could be a year if that's if that's really what it

takes to me it's ready when it's ready so an Eevee I met you a year ago at the

at Sundance and I mentioned a sci-fi one-hour trauma that I have and I

finally have it ready and it's been vetted and actually I don't even know if

I would go into all that detail but it said I mean and here's the brief premise

the very very briefly executives don't want a whole big description because

they also can be liable they don't want to hear ideas in too much detail because

they're not allowed to accept them for legal reasons but if it's someone that

you have met and just to give them a refresher this is the sci-fi one-hour

pilot about an alien who comes to earth can I send it to you and they'll either

respond and say great or they might say no that also there's another

subject which is submission release forms because a lot of executives and

agents will not take material without a submission release form unless it's

being if it's this is if it's not being submitted by an agent or manager

interesting yeah I wonder if people really understand that when people see

and I've seen it on Twitter people's Twitter BIOS do I do not take you know

and I see it all the time so and I for a newbie I do think they realize the

implications and how it's a turn-off to when someone says no like that there's

reasons why right it's not because they are they they don't think your idea is

good it's because they're protecting them so right so then there are ways

around to try and bypassed that and yeah that would probably fall under a whole

conversation there's a networking and Submission policies oops but for someone

to respect that when they see that someone says we do not take line

positions okay yeah well a good counter can be okay I'd be happy to sign a

submission release form and as I say that my you know disclaimer is that as

I'm saying this I am NOT an entertainment attorney sure so whoever

you may be listening if you get a submission release form you advise you

to show it to an entertainment attorney and it is up to you to decide whether to

sign it or not but that is a way around

that legality of them not wanting to accept it at all I saw you write

something about dull bits in a script and I'm curious what that means yes a

Hitchcock has one of my favorite quotes which and not let's see if I for all of

those who are Hitchcock aficionados forgive me if I don't have it exactly

right but it's something to the effect of movies are exactly like a real life

but with all the dull bits cut out and essentially if you think about films you

are lying movies are lies so let's say you're

doing a story about Helen Keller or Abraham Lincoln and let's say this

ban whether it takes place over a year or takes place over a lifetime or 20

years we're seeing a two-hour movie generally speaking an hour and a half

two hours a little more it's a consolidation of real life so you

have to cut out the dull bits so this is also I would say a common mistake that I

see with writers is that the need to explain the entrance into a scene and

the and leaving we don't need to see characters o walking into a door walking

down the hallway unless of course it's very purposeful like you're doing a

thriller and someone's walking down a hallway and there may be someone in

another room that they don't know about so that's there it's very purposeful but

we don't need to see a character entering and saying hi oh I just came in

from the grocery store we don't need to play that scene out and then see they

carry Joe say okay I'm leaving now I'm exaggerating a bit but there have their

scripts that I've read where every scene practically starts with the character

entering and exiting another example would be if we see a husband and wife

and they are heading to the in-laws we don't have to see them get in the car

put the kids and there are a little you know and the seat belts and the baby

seat drive the full distance obviously or even part of the distance and we see

them get out of the driveway walk up the door ring the doorbell so that's an

example of you cut out deliberately those dull bits long order sometimes

I'll say to writers think of the law and order edits so you may have a scene

where one of the you know one of the detectives says so do you know about

have you ever seen this victim you know what

last time I saw her she was partying with her friend Jessie where do you find

Jessie oh she's always hanging out at such-and-such Club boom we're at the

club and sometimes we might pick up a scene mid-conversation

so that's one example of cutting out dull bits that's a great analogy I like

that do you think people get some of that confused with novel writing yes

okay and even in novels you don't always have

you know character entering and entering but exiting but in with novel writing

one of the things that you can do is get fully inside the head of your character

so she's walking down the street and she sees a leaf and it reminds her of when

she was young this is I can factor and lost her virginity and we don't have the

luxury in scripts you can of course do well fantasy sequence or flashback but

generally speaking you can't do go on and you can't as like in a book you can

describe smells in a movie you can't really describe a smell you could say

that character burns toast and there's smoke coming out of the toaster but so

it definitely has to be much more economical and one of the things I said

a lot I was an English major where my greatest teachers was Shakespeare and

when I say that is that of course I had wonderful teachers who were guides but

one of the greatest teachers is reading great authors great screenwriters great

playwrights I talk about a lot of times with writers getting them feedback about

not writing with exposition Harold Pinter is a master of subtext I

recommend Matthew whiner and that Mad Men the characters rarely say exactly

what they're feeling there's so much subtext and it just makes the writing

that much more powerful do you think the the lost art of novel

reading will come back I don't know if I feel it's that lost even though Barnes

and Noble sadly is you know closing and but I think they're just so many

wonderful books out there and I know so many people who are in book clubs and I

J K Rowling bless her I mean she is responsible for getting more people more

children into reading and there's so many great authors out there and of

course as we know books are a great great source for for movies Hollywood

loves intellectual properties they like source material

it's another strategy sometimes with screenwriters they have a script and

it's well written and it they've been having a hard time for whatever reasons

gaining traction sometimes them they may turn it into a book and if the book

starts to get traction then they sort of reverse-engineer and go back and then

sell it as sell the script sell the book and the script based on the book scripts

are just awful when the writer tells you everything did I say that mine said that

okay who uh she's not a screenwriter she's not a producer she has been in the

business a long time as a unit publicist and she she has exquisite taste in films

and I remember asking her because I was asked that for I think a topic of an

article and I said what would you say is one of the things that makes has made

you want to get involved with a script and what do you think makes the script

really good and her we came out of her mouth is what makes scripts awful is

when characters tell you everything so examples are if a husband and a wife

let's say a wife saw her husband having lunch with another woman that she didn't

know about and he comes home from work he's like hi honey how's your

day and she were to say what she'll probably say in real life is it nothing

with that kind of you know I mean Matthew waters a master of the subtext I

recommend looking at just about any episode of Mad Men but much less

interesting so or she might say is that the husband comes in and says what did

you do today and I was in a similar situation once with and I did not say I

saw you with another woman having lunch today I wanted him to like I wanted to

maybe catch him in a lie I said or actually like well I you know what did

she do today and he said nothing special really did you have lunch somewhere

interesting what are you talking about and like maybe one of the things that I

love is that if you really play along with that you can also play with the

audience in terms of them thinking oh yeah he was having an affair then we

find out that it was an interior decorator and he was surprising his wife

by he just bought a little vacation home and he was making sure that or you just

like was renting in Malibu a place and he wanted to make sure all this stuff

was special for their anniversary and then what can happen is if she keeps

testing him and testing him and and she like starts bringing up old stuff about

how he pisses her off that scene could end with him not telling her what the

surprise was and the couple deciding you never trust me you know what I was gonna

do something nice with for you and screw you I want a divorce I'm just spinning

here and I'm not saying that that's you know they the greatest scene but that's

an example of when you play with subtext versus characters saying everything that

they're thinking another example if you take a streetcar named desire with

Blanche and Stanley and Stella and if you had

lanch saying well i really have been working as a prostitute and I'm

depressed and I have nowhere else to live game over like not very interesting

so if you think about it in those terms um yeah it's and it's really reflecting

how people are in real life people don't always say exactly what they're thinking

and feeling oh not at all yeah but that's what makes it so interesting too

because you like you said going along on the ride wondering will there be a

raised eyebrow that will reveal something or exactly versus because then

it just has like this flat tone and it really doesn't replicate human life and

I feel like that's one of the things that I was saying earlier when you would

ask what I love about movies is that we can vicariously put ourselves in the

other characters situation and we can say I've been in a situation like that I

didn't want to confront my husband if he'd been with another woman and so on

and so forth some or that like if you can tell sometimes if there's like

gossip or somebody said something about you so they come in how are you exactly

yes and you know they want something from that statement and then we can I

ourself in the the feeling of the person who is suspecting that maybe they were

talking about her but they're not coming out and saying right so I think that's

such a good point that you bring up is that it really engages us so much more

and because that's a comment that I said a lot you want to be engaged I mean good

writing good script the scripts at command attention is with an

extraordinary capacity to engage your reader and that's usually through really

smart dialogue like that like what you were talking about you talked about two

scripts that don't propel the character forward mm-hmm so can we can we have

maybe some examples of ones that would and then ones that don't or just some

themes all right well gosh okay Breaking Bad is that

a great example of an escalation of situations and the so I would say that's

the character every step that he takes there's a consequence and it leads to

another and another and then the character might try and get himself out

of it but it's it's it's kind of like the notion of Macbeth once you create or

do something bad it is it has its own momentum the I it's hard to say without

really doing specifics but basically every scene you want to feel that you're

advancing the story you're advancing the plot even if a character has a setback

that's there's still it there's still one of the I guess best ways to think

about it is that there's the core spine of the story where a character primary

character or you may have an ensemble but that each has a goal that there's a

primary objective that the character is trying to obtain and the obstacles that

get in the way that prevent them from that and how they even if it's a step

back but then they're still trying to overcome that obstacle there or in most

movies successful movies follow that formula I hate to say formula cuz I

don't like two things being being formulaic and an example really where

stories are not propelled forward is when I think the writer loses focus that

the focus is too diffused and one of the common reasons for that would be when

there are too many characters when a writer is introducing so many characters

that rather than get to know one or a few really well we're getting glimpses

of all these different characters but none of them because they don't have

time to develop them particularly well and so we don't have a core sense of

what a character is primary foe kiss or a group of characters primary

focus and goal is what are the obstacles that get in their way so I think anytime

there's a really diffuse focus and then scripts don't they one of just being

very dispersed and rather than having a through-line how does the lead

characters arc relate to structure very good question

when people talk about structure a lot referring to the classic structure that

we'll hear in Syd field and Bob McKee and I think both of those writers there

are books on screenwriting I think are really I think every screenwriters

should aspiring screenwriter should should read those books the question

about structure you'll hear okay there has to be act 1 act 2 act 3 and inciting

incident sometimes writers get so bogged down with oh no I've got it here too -

these they're really guidelines and it's really beginning middle and end when you

think of act 1 X 2 X 3 I know some other people are talking about 7 & 8 X

structures and so on but really with the story you want to have it can take away

all the terminology you're really looking at a beginning middle and end

the character you're usually starting out with a heroine or hero and that they

have a strong emotional want I think it's very that's really how we usually

get engaged whether it's the heroine in The Hunger Games she wants to protect

her sister and save her sister from dying you know in these these crazy

games and then the the journey the path is very clear she wants to survive and

live and in the process make sure that other people she cares about don't get

hurt the and then we have so many obstacles along the way because at every

twist and turn there are some things some element going against her

threatening to destroy her soshe's that's a very physical type of

obstacle that she has to continually try to overcome a movie that I loved in

terms of its character arc and maybe it's an oldie but goodie is an officer

and a gentleman you had the character who in the very

opening you see that he is the father who is it

drunk womanizer doesn't appreciate his son at all doesn't think his sons going

to amount to anything when he tells him that he's enlisted he I think makes fun

of him what you think you're a man now the whole movie is really about a guy

with so much armor and bad attitude when he first gets to training camp he

doesn't share with other of his bunk mates on other soldiers and he's just

really not a good guy but we know that deep down inside he's

carrying all this emotional hurt and we know that he really does want to be

better and not wind up like his dad and then you had the amazing performance by

Lou Gossett jr. as his captain sergeant who winds up breaking him down so you

have a character trying to better himself and then finally when he's

broken is when he starts to become a better guy and becomes an officer and a

gentleman and winds up with the girl and so on but usually there's a character

flaw or vulnerability and we see that getting chipped away and chipped away

until they're healed and that also applies in romantic comedies as well and

I can think of a couple of examples whether it's proposal or something about

Polly where you know the Ben Stiller character is very anal and the last

thing he wanted was the Jennifer Aniston character and through that relationship

he winds up becoming less uptight and really capable

of loving what about in the wrestler going back to that such a well that's

see not that's a really good question not every movie has to have this like

huge epiphany or growth the I'm trying to think the I think the wrestler is

thinking of something about Schmidt I was thinking also of fellini's movie La

Strada with Anthony Quinn where the character is in a relationship with this

woman that he totally takes for granted and the oh it would be a spoiler alert

at the end of the movie we see a man who really is broken and realizes that how

that he really is all alone so maybe there's a sense of growth or victory in

the triumph of awareness very quiet kind of Arc in Something About Schmidt that

Jack Nicholson character is looking for connection looking for connection

reconnecting with family friends whatever he is his left since his wife

died and realizing a sense that his life has really passed him by and at the end

of the movie the child that he was trying to be a pen pal with and finally

responded and it was so touching is it's the notion that we all we all want his

love in here that he was finally developing a relationship and a love

connection it was so small but it was meaningful and the wrestler what was so

sad was that he really he messed up he messed up connecting with his daughter

in the only place where he belonged was the ring even if that was going to be

where he was going to it was going to kill him so it just but you did see a

character who had a strong emotional want and I would say how structure

in terms of beginning middle and end relates to characters arc is starting

out with their strong emotional want what are the obstacles along the way and

the wrestler the obstacle was that he's been a screw-up certainly as a father

he's the obstacles are he's no longer he's older and been through a lot in

battle in the ring and that he the obstacle trying to reconnect and get a

daughter who he really abandoned to love him and then he gets in his own way but

we're sustaining this characters emotional want he has a setback and so

on and we see it through to the end whether they wind up satisfying and

learning or wind up going down and we just get a glimpse of their humanity

Wendy we had this comment come in a couple days ago on YouTube and the

viewer asked what should writers be concerned with when revising their

second or third draft of something a really good question because I know like

we all talked about a first draft but invariably the biggest part of writing

your script is the rewrite in the rewriting the rewrite I think the

biggest danger is well put it this way the purpose and the benefit is that it's

going to get clearer and crisper and better and tighter so the danger is when

you lose sight of what your core vision is now there are two ways this could

happen first if you've never haven't had a strong core vision to begin with then

each draft the goal should be to refine what that is and maybe the writer needs

to do an outline first and be really clear and I do recommend I think Blake

Snyder has a very effective beat sheet that's a useful tool and again I tell

writers that use it as a general guide and a general map but don't feel that

you have to adhere to like oh I've got it insert this moment at

exactly this page or try to contrive things you must be organic to your

follow your own organic process the another thing just with like about rules

and following formulas I'd like to use as an example when you see a great prima

ballerina like I saw many years ago Makarova who was one of the preeminent

ballerinas when I was growing up and she you know that she practiced her bars and

she knew her craft but when she got on stage you then abandon it it becomes

second nature that you should know your craft but that you can be free enough to

let the muse flow through you if you're so manufactured where you're trying to

hit every plot point and you're writing from that place you're not going to have

the magic and the kind of flow that a writer needs to have to really create

magical characters and dialogue and story so but it's helpful to have this

map so this is for a writer who might not have core vision to begin with for

most writers they do have a core vision of their piece and the danger becomes

when you lose your Center and you start listening to you're like a weed in the

wind that you keep swaying so this person said I should do this so I'm

going to do that this person said you keep going just in too many different

directions it is an art to be a artur a balance to be able to take advice

feedback suggestions from other people let it go through a sieve earth-like

filter and something that occurs to me is to maybe approach the advice the way

they make recommendations with meditation when you're when thoughts

come to you it's not that you're so rigid about I can't think any thoughts I

can thing any thoughts so the same way

you're not being richer than that I'm not going to take anyone suggestions and

you're not saying I'm gonna take everyone's suggestions you okay let's

see this was a good idea I'm gonna let that percolate this idea I don't think

it really fits in with the vision so I'm gonna put that one aside

I'll reexamine it just in case there's something there I need to look at and

there are others that you may go oh this person they don't get it at all

maybe I'm doing something that's not making it clear enough but I don't I

don't think they're the right person to give me advice for this you cannot a you

can't be a pleaser where you're trying to please everybody but generally

speaking if there is valuable feedback then to take it in and put it through

your own filter and process and see how you can address so the biggest danger is

losing sense of self and trying to please everybody and then you wind up

with mush and that's nothing it's neither here and are there there's a no

vision so can we just define coefficient here would be a really good example I

had a client who had a one-hour drama that was inspired by his life

experiences and he had a really really interesting story based on his

profession and he sent me the draft he had told me the logline and what he had

done and then I read the draft and I was like this doesn't sound at all like your

story and he had changed the protagonist to a woman which can be fine but there

were it felt so manufactured and contrived and so I just said a very

innocent question I said I'm really curious because what you would pitch to

me based on your life experience was so fascinating and riveting and I felt like

and that's what really interested me about the idea for this pilot and I

didn't see what I know of you I didn't see any of

you in this pilot whether it was a male or female character and he told me that

he had taken a number of writing workshops were or script coverage

services and certainly there are good ones out there but one they said you

should change it to a female you should make the protagonist a woman not a man

someone else said oh you should give her this backstory and you should give her

such and such kind of relationship with her mother and with an abusive boyfriend

and it became so far removed from what I thought was really the core vision or

essence of the story that he wanted to tell and he let go of that and came up

with something that and I he said I didn't even want to write this but I

thought I should you know that these were people who were telling me that I

that I should so that's what I think you need to stick with your core vision that

would be an example it's a great place to start on we talked about being able

to take constructive criticism and not being defensive and being open to the

notes what if people are giving you super nice feedback about things and it

feels disingenuous and you're not sure is this just a person that's trying to

please me mm-hmm it doesn't have to be a family member or friend and how do we

see through that it's a good question I think one is to say when you're seeking

constructive criticism because it is coming from a I mean I this is how I'd

like to give notes and if I'm asking someone to evaluate something for me I

may say I need you to be gentle this is my style I don't respond well to someone

who's going to shred everything but I do want honest feedback so if someone a lot

of writers will say to me and I usually say before I do consulting I say I want

to make sure that you want honest feedback certainly everyone has an

opinion what you will get from me is an informed opinion being that I do feel

it as one of my strengths as we get older I think we come to know what some

of our strengths are my affinity for literature from a young age to you know

working in the business and working for a long time with writers and loving the

process and that when you as a writer when you ask an opinion that you a lot

of writers will say to me I want an honest I will don't be afraid you can be

brutal etc it's not my desire or style to be

brutal because I don't like my teachers I did not feel that's constructive but I

do feel that I also say to my clients I'm not doing you a favor if I don't

provide an honest assessment based on my experiences in the business based on my

knowledge of how other industry executives respond to material it's not

the only opinion certainly but it will be an informed opinion so I think that

when writers are asking for feedback that they if someone's really like oh I

loved everything I loved everything that they you say I don't want you to just

say this to be nice if you have something that you think is constructive

and I can improve I would really appreciate that I would really value

that doesn't really matter if a protagonist is active or passive I I

think it does I think nobody wants to watch a passive

character and even in real life if we I guess there are some exceptions like

leaving Las Vegas where you had a depressed alcoholic who said that was

his journey and that's what the movie was about and of course it was based on

a very well known book the but even like a movie like Zelig where i guess it's a

character who's passive who's assuming other characters personalities that are

other individuals personalities assuming their identities

that he's actively doing that but most cases and then a certain way I guess you

could say in leaving Las Vegas and Nicolas Cage character was even though

he's sitting on a self a most of the time but he was pretty committed and

actively pursuing drinking himself to death and dying in Las Vegas he was

committed to not leaving Las Vegas I guess they think that otherwise it's

it's just boring and even in with the writing of a script it's best not to use

passive verbs such as he is being he is

he you always want to keep it active like he's walking it's not like the

sidewalks are passing him by i but I feel that you always want to have an

active protagonist sometimes you get scripts that are where they'll change

someone may change tenses you it always has to be active present tense talking

again about like getting too much advice to change a character even though it's

sort of like your central journey and you're writing about it do you think

people layer it with other parts of another character because it's too close

to home they don't want to totally write their story but the central message or

value of the film is a certain way but because they don't really want to have

it be their own biopic really that they pepper in these different things and it

waters it down so they make the protagonist a female when it's really a

man's journey right oh or a young man's coming-of-age story now I think that

come in it's interesting because with the changing of protagonist from a male

to female I understand that I mean if you take a movie like speed it did work

that it was a female but you could have reversed the sexes and it could have

worked the movie that Sandra Bullock did with not too long ago it was originally

I think written as a for George Clooney and they changed it

to a female I'm not adverse to that at all and I've had instances where I might

have where I've done that and sometimes it might been this a white lead and you

can make it an african-american character or a latin-american character

and that's fine and that's fresh you know to not have to you so there are

times when it can be really really great and improve the story but it's when a

person is compromising the the essence and spirit of what they are connecting

with and it's fine to I mean I've done true stories where we couldn't use the

actual characters names so we might have changed the their profession so if one

was a computer engineer maybe we made him a real estate agent or if the story

took place in Connecticut we changed it to Colorado

things like that are fine but it's you don't you want to always have a

connection with the true essence and spirit of the story and you accord I go

back to that word for me it's a core vision of something that moves Ewing and

compels you and is a really strong story that you want to tell and at the heart

of it is usually a it might be an image that triggers something or usually a

character with what I call a strong emotional want that I had mentioned you

a right we talked about that I feel like I'm always learning from respected

colleagues and associates and there's a screenwriter who I really really respect

and he was the one who would we can talk about motivation

I love with his phrase was that every character that you become engaged with

especially protagonist in almost every great film has this a character with a

very strong emotional want and need and actually another book that I love

Stanislavski an actor prepares he gives backstory for what the actor

needs to do before entering a scene and he talks about a character having a

super objective which is the grand overriding life objective and then the

immediate objective so maybe the big objective is I want to be retired and

live in the Bahamas my immediate objective I need to get this job

promotion or I mean a wolf just from this you could have different genres

immediately I can tell you that the different immediate objective is that he

wants to kill the man he works for and get his money and steal his money so

two totally different movies with when you change what the immediate objective

is and the super objective thinking - when you talk about books an adaptation

I love is White Oleander oh yeah that was really oh my gosh amazing film and

and book as well if you were to change Alice and Loehmann's character to a male

it seems like then you would have to change all of the foster parents to men

as well because it was a it was a relationship between the mother and

daughters right how toxic that was and it does create different dynamics I

think also because that was based on source material a really well-respected

book and a best-seller that you wouldn't change it and there probably wouldn't it

if it wasn't based on the best-selling book you could go other way but there

are two different stories and I think again ever if it was a screenwriter or

the author what is truest to what's getting you going what is inspiring you

is it you know dynamics between a mother and daughter are different than between

a father and son so I think it's really connecting as a writer when I say core

vision another way to describe it is the source of inspiration the thing that

gets you really excited about the story what is the journey you

want to tell right into for the motivation of all those mothers whether

it was Michelle Pfeiffer's character mhm and then all of the you know Renee

Zellweger had her own um you know motivation mm-hmm and and and Robyn

writes care it was so they all had these interesting motivations yeah very much

yeah and that's I think it's important for screamers to really I think we can

never take for granted not knowing our characters well enough now if it's

purely an action film like a speed it's not so important to the ride is the

movie the or the mummy the original one the it's there are motivations clearly

and a strong plot but it's really less about deep character development but

anytime you're doing if it's generally speaking if it's a psychological

thriller family drama comedy you need to not take for granted that you can't know

your characters enough a lot of writers don't go through that step of really

knowing them and immersing themselves in that character or characters I mean and

it comes up with like who are they what you know where are they when that the

movie starts are they in a happy place are they in a sad place did they just

break up with a boyfriend you are they on top of the world did they just get

fired these so knowing those kinds of things

and I apply what Stanislavski said which is what is their super objective what do

they want and life so to go through all of those things is there even if it's

not in the script is there a pivotal thing that happened that damaged them so

those types of things I usually give clients and working with the character

questionnaire to help unleash all those things about their character I so

because you can't really write from an abstract place just oh he's a guy

I like that the questionnaire that's great how can a screenwriter create a

hero that we want to follow I keep saying the same thing but it's for me

that you find you start with the characters a really strong emotional

want and I feel like we take any any

successful film critically acclaimed film it's always character that has that

strong emotional want whether it's a in mention with the wrestler that my

upbringing I have nothing in common with a wrestler the nut boys don't cry a

million dollar yeah baby baby I don't have anything in common with a

white-trash girl who wants to box but boy did she have a want yeah and so

that's and I don't mean to say that in a I'm trying to say the opposite that so

I'm not trying to make a judgment or be snobby I'm saying that a great film has

a character with a strong emotional want that no matter what our upbringing our

race we can identify and relate to that character the the protagonist and Barry

Jenkins film moonlight I don't know what it's like to grow up as a young black

gay man in Miami but we can all relate to feeling like an outsider at some

point in our lives wanting to be accepted having very extraordinarily

difficult situations and there was such beauty in the way this character was

able to persevere and overcome and then it was also told structurally in a very

interesting manner and again there is an example where that didn't follow what a

lot of people would say is a you know the classic Syd field or Bob McKee

structure it was told almost like three more I would say oh not quite Faulkner

but there was a novelistic approach to it I think you can break structure

when you're when you understand it to begin with and you're here you're

hitting everything else really right so writing authentic characters compelling

dialogue compelling situations and it is well structured so but I do feel it's

like tapping into that thing that we as humans want and can identify with and

what are universal flaws that that a character may have switching gears just

a tiny bit have you ever not taken on a project and for what reasons all the

time I mean most of the time and that's the fact that what most writers are

faced with that it is a game of mostly rejections and I know as a producer I

feel like if I wind up optioning a project writers have bent a lot of odds

to have someone decide they want to option the project I then have to try

and go and sell it I had a project once where it took me a year and I sent it to

every single it was a network to like every single network and this was a time

when you had to wait the protocol was you couldn't take it somewhere else

until you heard back today you can do multiple submissions but that was a

protocol back then and it was the last network that I took it to and the head

of the network who's very well respected industry individual the executive showed

us his comment what they would do is the executives would every month they would

gather the top tiers of projects that they've read and liked and they would

give it to their boss he would read it on the weekend ours came back and we had

been rejected like 12 places but I always knew it was a good story and a

lot of the rejections were that it just doesn't fit into our mandate we're not

doing this type of story right now and anyway he wrote in the margin this is a

good story so I a genuine once said that all it takes is

one yes now it's also fine balance because if

you were getting no no no no no consistently with feedback that like the

feedback that I was getting lesson this isn't a good story it was this isn't the

right project for us right now or we have something similar to this if you're

getting feedback where someone says and I never heard this quite a bit I like

the concept I didn't love the execution and I can elaborate on that or I I

really like the concept but I didn't love the protagonist I didn't feel that

character was developed enough and that's why I'm very tenacious when

working with writers before taking it out because I know what the odds are I

mean obviously a lot of writers know the odds but a lot of writers will say well

I see stuff get made all the time that's not very good we don't know the

circumstances of how and why that project got made if it went through too

many revisions and it lost its center it went through different regime changes

nobody starts out trying to make a bad movie with the exception of one I can

think of and takes pride and it's been a huge hit and a cult hit because there

are two movies I can reference one because it's out right now the the

disaster artist well but even that guy didn't start out to make a bad movie and

it obviously developed a cult following because of its uniqueness that way but

the you know no one is when people say oh but there are writers who get stuff

me and it's not very good I feel it's such a poor model to even reference

because so should that be your model that like okay well my movie doesn't

have to be perfect I don't care if it's that great other people's can get made

no my feeling is that you need to make sure that it's at the absolutely best

level it can be and and and if you do get consistent

feedback where people are saying I'm just not loving the character enough and

then I think you need to go back to your script and then talk to your buddies in

the industry whose opinions you respect and say do me a favor will you take a

look at this again let me know what you think maybe I could make better maybe

going to workshop it definitely do your research to see because you know which

would I think there are some workshops that are better than others and you can

do your due diligence by talking to fellow writers who maybe have taken a

particular workshop what they've gotten out of it what the results have been

like and or of course work with you know a script consultant other industry

colleagues like I mentioned assistant if you you're starting out you may know

assistants who work for agents or production companies or studios and have

them read it and give you feedback do we have a lot of screenwriters in their 20s

that watch our videos and they're just starting out and they're in an early

stage of their writing careers is there any advice you can give to them oh sure

luck they've won I think one of the best tips is it was I I heard a female runner

say when she came out to LA she spent the first year reading every single

pilot that had been picked up that she could get her hands on and that could

and also maybe reading pilots of series from a couple years ago I do feel that's

when I certainly Shakespeare for me was one of my best teachers just

understanding how well-defined his characters were the dialogue and the

conflicts and they you know the characters needs and wants and what gets

in their way and I mean it the stakes you don't get bigger than Shakespeare

with Macbeth or Hamlet and so I there are great teachers and great

Matthew one or we you can watch Mad Men absolutely you know you can watch a lot

of series but there is something about seeing the written word the other thing

is an exercise and I think this is a very powerful exercise and might not

seem like fun but it can be fun is to watch if your I did this actually when I

was in my 20s starting out officer and a gentleman and this is before you could

download scripts on the internet I did I watched the whole movie and I wrote down

as I was watching it what each scene was so I had to pause a lot but in what it

does is it really helps you understand and get a feel for rhythm and structure

almost through osmosis through that process of doing it and the point of

doing it isn't so you can go and you're not plagiarizing or copying it's to get

you to just understand rhythms of scenes and how they flow from one to the next

and what and you you can see when you're doing it okay whereas what's the act one

the Act one break usually it's supposed to be around page 27 in a feature so you

see where that kind of flows when you're copying you know a script and if you

don't have to do every single line baby okay Richard Richard Gere's with his

father they wake up right after they've had an evening of debauchery and hookers

and Richard Gere's now off to to training camp in the military then the

next scene and I don't remember exactly but let's say the next scene is he's on

a bus and we see exterior they did the facility then next scene maybe we see

Debra Winger as a waitress I don't remember everything so forgive me but it

also gets you into the understanding and the that screenwriter is a wonderful

screenwriter the it gets you into seeing how when I was talking about not

including the dull bits you could see beautiful juxtapositions like he's off

to the military and then maybe the next thing he's in line and being asked to

salute and it's just it's a wonderful exercise this woman who has became a

successful writer in television she read pilot so if you feel like you're want to

be a half-hour person and if you want to do multicam and you feel like NBC CBS

ABC style sit comes or your thing which are multicam versus single-camera

which is more like Aziz Ansari and the marvelous mrs. Mazal master of none then

get those scripts read them see how they introduce the characters see how

distinct all the voices are they're so distinct and these will be some of your

best teachers continuing on with advice for the the 20-something year old

writers that we get feedback from I think you mentioned that you went to see

the writer Jorge Luis Borges speak yes and that he said I'm finally getting

better and it was 80-some yes right no cuz this is something that happens a lot

writers will say well when will it be ready when will it be ready what or it's

ready it's ready and I have a client who I love dearly and we worked very closely

together and I many many drafts ago she said okay this is it this is the final

draft and I'm like I would love for it to be the final draft I don't want it's

not late and I mean I do with consulting but it's not like I want my biggest

baileywick if you will or heyday is to have a really strong script that I can

take out to the market and get set up with a production company studio network

etc and so I'm reading it and she one of the things we had changed the location

from overseas to New York and we changed one of the characters from an Italian to

a New York Italian and she changed his name so I think he was Giovanni and then

he became so when I was reading that script the

character she kept going back and forth with the name and that's just a very

simple fix but you know here's someone saying it's final and I wanted to be

final and it wasn't you know a hundred percent perfect yet just even on a very

cosmetic level so the notion of and when you brought up jorge luis borges that i

was in college and he came to our campus and spoke and he was in his I think he

was about 82 and he was going blind and he said Here I am and then going blind

I'm 82 and I feel like I am just now getting good at my craft and here was a

man who received some of the highest literary honors you can get and it was

inspiring and when I see younger writers saying you know well it it's done it or

it's good enough for it and any writer at any age can really say that I feel

like any time I've watched on some of the talk show interviews with

best-selling book authors amazing directors screenwriters very often when

they speak now they say it's taken them seven years so I feel like and when I

see someone like bohr Hayes speak the way he did if people who are such

masters it's taking them like seven years or more

or in the case of bore case a lifetime to just feel like he's getting good

then we need to relish enjoy soak up the process of continuing to get better and

better and better so that's and I I mean anyone we greatly respect whether today

if it's Aaron Sorkin or Jason Reitman they all say that you know they go

through multiple I mean I mean I think it's like gone through

3040 drops on some of his projects and with the Aaron Sorkin I don't remember

how many like he does but I also did hear him say once that it takes him it

takes him anywhere from a year to 18 months to deliver a first draft he's

turning over and over the characters and so I feel like if these great masters

who really have excelled in their fields in their craft if it takes them so long

why do we think that if we're just starting out that we should be able to

do it sooner and I'm offer if it can happen soon

great but the process is the process right and Jason is of a generation where

they want things faster yes so that that's very telling in that sense

because I feel like now everything's so sped up and instantaneous that it

heightens all that you know you hear on Twitter and see all this stuff about

this person's just been discovered but we don't realize we don't realize and

I've heard also with some great writers being interviewed you know people say oh

they just wrote it one or two drafts and then when you hear them speak they say

that it was they did multiple drafts I just feel like basically there really

aren't shortcuts I do think there's an anomaly maybe someone can write

something and it just everything's aligned and the muse and the ability and

it just flows out of you and I think that can't happen but it really is an

anomaly most of the time they're things require more and more refinement and

craft it kind of goes back to what you said earlier about the female showrunner

who's achieved great success but she says people want the outcome but they

probably wouldn't want to do all the hours and and all the probably late

nights behind a computer stressing over some little deal yeah yeah and I think

that's a huge thing people don't see some of that work that

it's true and and they just want the faster around and it's human nature

nobody want to have to put it exactly but it's true this is a common question

I ask but it usually ends up having great results and that is of your IMDB

credits which one whether it was a short TV series whatever which one taught you

the most and why without naming of course sure object I feel like each one

has taught me and it's really from the people that I worked with that I learned

so one of the things I feel like my first job I worked for a producer I felt

was a master at cultivating interest in projects um so he knew how to generate

interest and position and I learned in cases where I might have missed out on a

project by not being assertive enough and I say one project which I sold and

it was such a great high I was it was at a time when I was told that it was at a

particular network that they had spent their financing for the fiscal year and

we had an option on the book and it was about to be up and that also it was a

period piece and they said we're not doing period we're not doing period and

I won't saying but this reads to the president of the production company this

wreath so hipped the sweets so contemporary most women today would die

to do what this girl did back then and I would my boss actually said to me after

that you know be careful you shouldn't be so boisterous you know with the

president anyway to make a long story short I wound up speaking to the network

to where we had a deal and got the president of the company and hurt VP's

all on board and they wound up optioning the book and it was a series so there

were gonna be three books sadly there was a regime change after we started the

process and we did get a first script and

the new regime decided that they didn't want to do it again and that happens in

the business and it's unfortunate but it is part of the business and hopefully

you just continue to build on the successes and you're always going to

have failures you learn from your failures I mean that case sometimes

there are things outside of one's control but what I learned there was to

have the courage of my convictions I remember there was an executive at the

EBC who had said to his group and they did really wonderful programming if

we're going to fail I want us to fail big because we tried not fail because we

were scared and if you look at any network and breakout shows they were

taking risks and going against the grain and whether it was married with children

at the time x-files was on there was nothing like that and then everybody

wanted to copy and do something like x-files and the and I remember the sell

of x-files was the head of the network saying to Chris Carter I just want you

to do what you really want to do so that was brave for the executive in hindsight

we can all say that's fine but he was really encouraging the pure voice and

creativity of that particular writer and boy when you you know can follow your

vision and your passion and you have combined with the talent to deliver and

the support and the right studio behind you can really deliver something that's

iconic and you you know becomes part of the our pop culture and everything the

going back to the so what I had learned so I really felt strongly because of

that reward that I would always follow the courage of my convictions so I think

it's really important to do that with other movies I would say I learned from

a really intelligent boss writer director who's no longer with us that

just not to have a lazy mind and never go for the easy solution he was

rated with development and when what other stories we had and I learned so

much from him was to really look at the authenticity of how a character would

behave and not just go for the obvious easy generic solution so that really

taught me I think to be diligent and try and find the unexpected behavior in

characters and so anyway - I could be here for a long time but I have I've

learned from really I think our greatest teachers are working with other people

who who are good at what they do what does writing a marketable

screenplay mean great question probably one of my favorite questions I often say

that you can have a great idea super high concept and I think I referenced

previously I've heard story ideas that go oh my god that is great I want option

before I even read it and then I read it and it's not well executed so if you

have a great concept that's not well executed chances are that it will not

sell if you have a high concept that is well executed you have a much better

chance of a getting salt conversely you can have a project that is totally not

high concept but if it is beautifully executed it then becomes marketable so

for example if we take a movie like Juno and I'll define high concept high

concept is The Hangover a bunch of guys you know from the movie poster I mean a

lot of people I know a lot of your audience knows what high concept is but

there are those who don't and it's terminology we use lawrence basically

where the concept is very big and immediately recognizable like from a

movie poster so the hangover and it's the guys are you know we all know it's

the hangover in its vegas you can tell from the movie poster and they all look

like they're Iraq and it's the 48 hours before bachelor is to

walk down the aisle at his bachelor party they go to Vegas and I his friends

lose him and they have now fort and don't have any recollection what

happened the night before and have 48 hours to find him before the wedding

that's one example of big big concept speed is a big concept anything that's

based on a brand like transformers it has a immediately recognizable built-in

audience brand value so the opposite of that would be a movie like Slumdog

Millionaire in fact most of the movies that when the Oscars are not high

concept Slumdog Millionaire Million Dollar Baby okay if you were to pitch

this I'm gonna do a you know not justice to the movie but if you think about it

like trying to get a studio to but this is a story about a girl who comes from

trailer park and she wants to be a boxer and she's mentored by this older dude

and she wants up getting entering herself to the point where she becomes

paralyzed on the way down and she paralyzed from the waist down and

basically asks him as an act of kindness to do euthanasia so she does okay who

would buy that nah you know Slumdog Millionaire this is was a great story

movie no known act American actor but you did have a an a-list director Danny

Boyle so that is what definitely helped get it made and it was also based on a

book swing blade another one magnificently written script and some of

these movies would definitely be harder to get done today but the you take Juno

you you know family drama teenage girl gets pregnant I mean really that used to

be like an after-school special or and no disrespect you know more of a TV

movie than a feature that would build such a big following

this year ladybird you know that's not a high concept rite of passage with the

young girl and but it was so well written and it resonated so much with

people the mother-daughter relationship the notion of growing up in a small town

and so the what makes a script marketable the script like Juno and with

Lady Bird the the quality of the writing the freshness of the characters the

truthfulness of the characters that then becomes marketable so that comes down to

me saying we write your best work I don't know any executives other people

may I don't know any executives who have optioned a script if they didn't care

for the dialogue the writing they didn't think it was I mean structure maybe is

the least offensive you know I hate I can be a good idea and maybe the

structure is not great but there the the characters are compelling the

situation's compelling and the dialogue is good and I just don't know anyone who

buy scripts if those elements aren't there so therefore I think if you are

gonna make a profession as a screenwriter it's not an easy profession

at all you have to roll up your sleeves and really get in there and I I read I

mean I'm working right now with someone who just graduated from film school and

it's quite his his writings were really good there are some elements that I

think needed to be much more pronounced what the underlying theme is and the

purpose of the journey and some things that didn't track what the character is

but there's a lot of talent there but I didn't think it's ready quite to take

out yet but he's doing some work now and he'll get there I mean there's there's a

there's a lot of talent and there's a lot of there's a lot of writing that we

isn't very strong and I think the biggest death to a writer is to is to

not be able to take notes well and I don't mean just any notes to be open to

constructive feedback and to want to put in their dues so I think that's the

biggest killer as well as trying to please too many people and not listening

to your own inner voice and I just say in terms of marketability what gets

agents attention producers studio networks is ace is it that you'll hear a

strong voice that there's something really fresh about a person has a point

of view and that the character writing the Quentin Tarantino is such a strong

voice and I would say that Greta Gerwig you know as a strong voice and we could

go on but I can't think of it their names but you know in even what's going

back to Lady Bird or just just briefly we went to see the post and

unfortunately the movie didn't play so we all had to leave the theatre but I

talked to a man who was maybe in his late 50s and he said he loved Lady Bird

so here's someone that it's not even really you would think that wouldn't be

the audience right but he said and he was recommending it to the people he was

with and we were kind of talking about it so you can see how he somehow

resonated with that voice and I mean it's a great scent the truthfulness of

that mother-daughter relationship which wasn't pretty

you know how they got in each other's faces and talked to each other but it's

was truthful and we know that they they did love each other and you know so

touching towards latter part of the movie when the mother who was really

kind of you know really tough with her daughter and the daughter didn't feel

like she really loved her even liked her and then we saw that she was trying to

write a letter to her and crumbled it up like 30 times that's a that's another

form of love versus this would be the boring

way of doing it and not so truthful to the human experience would be well you

know I love you maybe I'm hard on you but maybe I'm doing it for your own good

or maybe have my own issues so I'm not really able to love that well versus the

simple beautiful act that she was crumpling up letters because she want to

find the right words and couldn't that says so much more than anything that's

on the nose and obvious writing the whole part of coming from a smaller town

even though it's California's capital but there is a a small-town feel to

Sacramento for anybody who's driven through it and and wanting to like

really reinvent herself yes you know she didn't want to go by her given name they

wanted to be a writer on the East Coast right it wasn't okay to to be a writer

from California you know and and just wanting to reinvent her and I think

everyone can identify with versus you know no and so that's just really

wonderful writing versus I want to I want to be a writer I'm tired of being

in the small town I want to reinvent myself you know so that's that's what

although that's such a good example of why you know some people say would they

get the feedback about not to write expositionally what do you mean white

people can talk about like what you don't like people to be direct sure

there's a time and place and sometimes people are direct but most of the time

they're circling trying to figure out their lives who they are and so on and

that was a very beautiful example of that yeah I agree

so we've had a good two and a half three hours here sometimes I'm in a time warp

when I do these interviews but we've gotten incredibly valuable information

Wendy as we wrap up I would love to hear a success story and if you could just do

us a favor maybe just leave out identifying information that's kind of a

rule we have here sure I don't courage okay so let's see I think well or a

couple one would be from something that was quite a while ago that I had read a

a play by a writer and I was so enamored of the story it was main and it was on

CBS and it was called it wound up being called Sally Hemings an American scandal

and what I love about the story is that she had written it and I had first found

out about it I think it was either seven or nine years before it got made and all

say is that the stars were aligned and it was the fact that what happened was I

came close to selling it within the first two years so they had the project

it was under option I think when I was at Hearst entertainment and came close

but didn't sell it and then one day the writer and I read in the trades that

merchant ivory had a seldom movie called Jefferson in Paris with Nick Nolte and

the two of us and this happens in the business and it invariably I mean it

will happen stevarino I have two projects actually where there are other

competing projects in the marketplace and we're trying to get our stunt first

but anyway so the writer and I we were quite despondent and then was like

alright life goes on and one foot friend the other and you keep you know what's

the next project and you put your focus there but I never forgot how much I

loved that script and so Merchant Ivory movie was made and two years later I

felt like I would hear opportunities in network television where they were

interested in doing they were doing period pieces and you would haul me

which was a big producer at the time doing lots of period films for Network

and so every couple of years I would think maybe there's a different audience

that we could get and reach with them you know TV and I would seek

opportunities and I would call up the writer and I would say is that script

still available and she'd say yes and one of those times seven years later she

said yes as a matter of fact such-and-such actress I was having lunch

with her manager and we talked about and she might be interested in playing the

role so I wanted calling up CBS and saying we don't have a you know

commitment but we have preliminary interest from so-and-so and she said

we'll send it over and it was originally written as a two hour movie and the

network came back and said you know what we think we might be interested in

turning it into a miniseries but instead of making it so much about Thomas

Jefferson we'd like to make it more much more Sally Hemings point of view so we

did we rolled up our sleeves we spent a month working with her preparing an

outline to bring to the network so we could show what the end of night one was

that would ensure people there was enough of a cliffhanger that people

would come back for a night too so we could justify yes this is enough

material for a miniseries and the day we wind up going in to pitch two days

before it wound up hitting front page of New York Times Wall Street Journal

iving Time magazine that they hadn't done tests finally conclusively with

Thomas Jefferson and concluded from the DNA that he in fact did have a long-term

relationship with Sally Hemings and that they did have five children together so

all of our competitors were saying oh my god you guys were so smart to be on it

and in the network two days after little did they know that this was had started

about nine years earlier and as some mature a lot of us have heard this

expression but it is a very good one that success is when preparedness meets

opportunity so if we didn't have though if I hadn't

fallen in love with this piece if the writer hadn't written this wonderful

piece if in fact I I hadn't like continued every two years to inquire and

see if there was a new opportunity then you know it would and if we didn't do

our homework - really we spent a month to go in and I've seen very good writers

who have blown deals when they don't prepare enough you said something that

caught my ear and I just wanted to follow up and that is you've seen

writers blow a deal because they weren't prepared so are they not prepared to

know what the the genre that this network is is used to dealing with

actually it's biting more with sometimes if you have a script it can sell itself

but other times maybe you have a pitch I mean I've seen very very like

established writers go in a room and because they haven't prepared the pitch

really well and it kind of meanders and it could be a really good story but it I

really am a big any advocate of preparing and I reminded of seeing a lot

of people probably don't know Whoopi Goldberg when she started out she was an

absolutely brilliant comedian and she when I I saw her at a charity event and

man she killed it on stage and for her to be there's no question that Genie

certain geniuses and comedy your great ad libbing and this and that but they're

also for her to be and with most of the great comics they look so spontaneous

they work their butts off rehearsing and rehearsing to be able to deliver so

smoothly so I do think it's important for you if you're going to be pitching a

project to to be prepared and that's what we as producers had to do when we

were pitching the Sally Hemings piece and it's what I do all the time and when

I'm working with writers and we're going to go in and pitch is you know we have

to do the work why do you think an established writer wouldn't prepare a

pitch like that I think maybe took for granted or that had an attitude of well

I'll just wing it and these are people who are very articulate but I also would

say the times have we changed where I know like a former

boss of mine the network used to just go to him and say why don't you do a

project about such-and-such topic and if what now it just doesn't it just doesn't

work like that very established writers need to also like even if you're I'm

sure and I can't speak for him but like Ryan Murphy when he sells one of his

projects I'm sure that he has to at some point tell the network what they're

gonna be seeing per our purse you know the first hour the first night of a

miniseries we're going to be covering such and such part of the OJ trial and

then I'm there you're going to talk about your approach it's mostly so I

think that maybe taking for granted or assuming well I'll just wing it or

ad-lib it but I think it's you need to prepare and then the packaging again is

something you said people are looking at so that means having talent attached

writing crew attached so for example house of cars when it sold to Netflix

you had David Fincher one of the preeminent contemporary directors who

hadn't yet done series that was really attractive it was also material was

based on the book and a hit series in the UK Kevin Spacey who was a big star

at the time was also attached so that's like an ideal package a lot of the

marvelous mrs. Mazal that's the writing team that did the gilmore girls which

was very successful in its original form and then when it came back to Netflix

was also very successful so they knew that they had proven entities with a

strong voice and who can deliver really a successful show with really well drawn

character isn't situations consistently so that's kind of like the sort of

there's some element that's proven entity and/or really appealing it

could be someone who has just done a movie at Sundance that garnered a lot of

attention and they come in and again it's a thing about recognizing or that

someone has a strong voice and it's harder to break into without you know

having that first like when if you've already won some award at Sundance yes

it's easier to get Netflix attention but how do you get that first award at

Sundance it's because you have there's something

fresh in your material yeah and I remember just a serious at HBO where

they wound up hiring completely unestablished writers and trying to get

the name of the show but they had written a play that wasn't even produced

but they fell in love with the writing in their voice and then they the the

these that's writing team pitched the series and it became like it had of I

think five seasons on HBO Wendy and hearing what packaging means I think it

sounds great if you're established but for a new writer is that something they

should even be worried about thinking about striving for I think that again

the first thing a new writer should concern themselves with is writing a

really really good script I do think and I'm sure there are producers also who

you know come to film courage I feel like when I hear a story so if someone

ever like a writers that I've been working with who is also a documentary

filmmaker and he did a story and he showed me a few clips and I was like oh

my god this is so moving this is this is an amazing story and immediately I could

see that the character whose story this was based on would be a great role to

attract a leading actor so immediately I'm thinking

I'm thinking big names now that then helps me sell it and promote it if I

like let's say call CAA and I say I create a good compelling log line and I

say and it's a great vehicle for a leading actor and they might include

some prototypes they go great send that over because everybody is usually there

are exceptions but looking for something that's going to attract a star whether

it's a female leaning actress or a male leaning actor and I felt that this and

true stories very often it's a really good source to attract a leading actor

so I think if I mean the first priority is writing a good story I think with

screenwriters some and some screenwriters so they know they

definitely think of a prototype when they're writing it like they might here

was a renegade I see Marisa Tomei and the role and that can help their process

I feel anyone who gets too attached to the outcome before you've done the

process is probably not a good way to go and the with in the cases that say more

with producers or if you're a writer and you don't yet have a have a script on a

particular subject but you've optioned a true story or maybe they've written an

article that appears in a magazine and it can tell itself because there have

been stories option or turned into movies from newspaper articles I think

boys don't cry mean we know it was a true story the first time I became aware

of it I actually had read it in a magazine and I wanted to option I tried

to get the rights and sell it and I was not able to at the time I was primarily

focused on network and it was a little too edgy for a regular network anyway

she but that that was did come from an article as well as they said a true

story Argo was a true story also was an article which I think may have been that

jumping-off point for the it capturing the imagination of Cluny

anytime if you have something that's an article and if it's a tree story and you

can it just it you can you can sell true stories very often without having a

script yet so if you're a screenwriter that is something to think about if

there's a true story that you like and you might think oh gee this is a could

be a great vehicle for you know any number of young actresses or offers a

great role for male lead in his 40s so I think it's always wise to think about it

but not the cart before the horse where that becomes necessary the dominant idea

I but in the case of let's say if the writer producer has optioned the rights

to a true story then they would go out and start trying to package so it would

be about trying to get it in the hands of a production company that has greater

access and leverage and ability to reach out to agents to attach an actor

director and so on the also they can try to get to an agent I do coaching with

with those who are not represented to help them get through the gatekeepers

and through certain bypass certain industry protocols in order to get their

material seen there's ways that you can pitch that can entice someone even if

you don't yet have an agent does that answer the question about like packaging

yeah I think so yeah I would say generally ideally you if you can get it

to a production company they are going to be in a better position to try to

attach those key elements and so if someone says well you know we don't take

unsolicited material right then doing it through someone like you who could help

kind of procure that or also saying well then

we do what did you say that Oh dad I'm like they said we don't take unsolicited

material that they the writer/producer you can say alright well can I sign a

submission release form can you send that to me and then they should show it

to their entertainment attorney right a lot of writers don't like to sign them

but it is an industry standard if you're not represented and it's and that's why

you should have an attorney take a look but it is it is fairly standard but I do

understand why it's a catch-22 right so yeah because if they don't do it they

might not be able to submit their project and I know for myself sometimes

I've had to do them and there's some depending on the language that I won't

sign and others that I will and that's where the attorney to review yeah you

can't just go online and also just for a bit because I'm not an entertainment

area so I'm not telling someone oh you know dude go do this definitively they

should go see an expert in that field unless they're themselves very

experienced at reading those kinds of documents but generally yes have an

entertainment attorney look

For more infomation >> Finishing A Screenplay and Getting It Ready For Market - Wendy Kram Full Interview - Duration: 2:05:28.

-------------------------------------------

Weather Update: Christmas forecast 2018 - Duration: 2:45.

Hello! We're all wishing you a very Merry Christmas here at the Bureau, as we take

a look at the forecast for Christmas Day and Boxing Day. I'm already dressed for

the weather, with a warm and sunny Christmas on the cards for most

Australians as this broad ridge of high pressure across southern Australia means

a sttled day for most of our capitals—perfect for that game of backyard cricket.

Look at all those sunshine icons across the country, stretching from west to east.

Perth, Adelaide, Melbourne, Canberra and Sydney all in for a sunny Christmas.

And it'll be a warm one too, with Perth and Adelaide heading for scorchers of 35°C.

Canberra only a couple of degrees lower on 33°C, which is

still perfect for that dip in the pool after lunch. Just a few degrees cooler in

Melbourne, on 26°C, as winds turn a little more southerly in the afternoon;

and in Hobart a weak change moving through early on Christmas morning will keep

temperatures down to around 22°C and bring a partly cloudy day with just a slight

chance of a shower. Further up along the eastern seaboard

this high out in the Tasman will direct light north-to-northeasterly winds along

the New South Wales coast, but tending a little fresher and from the southeast up

along the Queensland coast. Sydney can expect a sunny 29°C for Christmas—

still perfect for lying on the beach at Bondi after lunch—with Brisbane also on 29°C

but with partly cloudy skies. Further north, across the tropics, we'll

see conditions fairly typical for late December—with Darwin expecting a

possible shower or storm and the top of 34°C. Into Boxing Day we'll see

this high centre continue to move east—here we go—

and it's just going to jump across Tasmania and into the southern Tasman Sea; and that'll mean

we'll start to see temperatures continue to rise through the interior and across the south.

For the start of the Boxing Day test in Melbourne, we'll see morning cloud

clear to a sunny afternoon and another top of 26°C, with light winds,

so really good conditions there. And for the start of the Sydney–Hobart yacht race

we'll see north-to-northeasterly winds of around 10–15 knots

in the morning increase to northeasterlies at 15–25 knots during the afternoon,

which should help the boats as they begin to make their way down the coast.

Out west, the west coast trough will move further inland on Boxing Day,

which will mean a more comfortable day for Perth as winds tend from the southwest,

and they'll see a mostly sunny day with 28°C the top.

Further north and east in Western Australia, though, the heat will peak in the mid- to high 40s!

There's even a couple of spots inland to the east of Karratha and

Exmouth, up in the northwest, with 49 or even 50°C on the forecast for Boxing Day.

So don't forget to check back on our website later today for the

afternoon forecast update for Christmas Day and over the next few days as we

see heat build across more populated areas of southern and southeast Australia.

With heatwave conditions developing, make sure to stay up-to-date with all

the latest forecasts and warnings; but tonight make sure to head to bed early

and don't forget to leave some milk and cookies out for Santa.

For more infomation >> Weather Update: Christmas forecast 2018 - Duration: 2:45.

-------------------------------------------

Closure of Albuquerque daycare leaves parents, teachers blindsided - Duration: 1:43.

For more infomation >> Closure of Albuquerque daycare leaves parents, teachers blindsided - Duration: 1:43.

-------------------------------------------

Tracking Snow For The Week Ahead - Duration: 4:35.

For more infomation >> Tracking Snow For The Week Ahead - Duration: 4:35.

-------------------------------------------

Extended headlines and weather for Sunday, Dec. 23 - Duration: 11:12.

For more infomation >> Extended headlines and weather for Sunday, Dec. 23 - Duration: 11:12.

-------------------------------------------

Tsunami causa más de 220 muertos y centenas de heridos en Indonesia - Duration: 2:13.

For more infomation >> Tsunami causa más de 220 muertos y centenas de heridos en Indonesia - Duration: 2:13.

-------------------------------------------

THE CHRISTMAS SONG (Mel Tormé), by Sophisticated Ladies At Den Blå Planet - Christmas 201800191 - Duration: 5:24.

For more infomation >> THE CHRISTMAS SONG (Mel Tormé), by Sophisticated Ladies At Den Blå Planet - Christmas 201800191 - Duration: 5:24.

-------------------------------------------

【2018】クリスマスの朝に娘「ユズ」の枕元に例のアレが - Duration: 10:42.

For more infomation >> 【2018】クリスマスの朝に娘「ユズ」の枕元に例のアレが - Duration: 10:42.

-------------------------------------------

왜 당신은 베개 밑에 마늘로 자야 할까? - Duration: 5:01.

For more infomation >> 왜 당신은 베개 밑에 마늘로 자야 할까? - Duration: 5:01.

-------------------------------------------

Autoboy Blackbox : Dashcam App - 2018-12-23 13:52:38 502 N Veterans Pkwy, Bloomington, IL 61701, USA - Duration: 1:01.

For more infomation >> Autoboy Blackbox : Dashcam App - 2018-12-23 13:52:38 502 N Veterans Pkwy, Bloomington, IL 61701, USA - Duration: 1:01.

-------------------------------------------

For more infomation >> Autoboy Blackbox : Dashcam App - 2018-12-23 13:52:38 502 N Veterans Pkwy, Bloomington, IL 61701, USA - Duration: 1:01.

-------------------------------------------

*NEW* KRAMPUS SKIN SHOWCASE WITH ALL FORTNITE DANCES & NEW EMOTES! (Fortnite Season 7 Skin) - Duration: 16:47.

For more infomation >> *NEW* KRAMPUS SKIN SHOWCASE WITH ALL FORTNITE DANCES & NEW EMOTES! (Fortnite Season 7 Skin) - Duration: 16:47.

-------------------------------------------

For more infomation >> *NEW* KRAMPUS SKIN SHOWCASE WITH ALL FORTNITE DANCES & NEW EMOTES! (Fortnite Season 7 Skin) - Duration: 16:47.

-------------------------------------------

BONNE HUMEUR POUR RIRE AVEC LE CHAT - Duration: 2:43.

For more infomation >> BONNE HUMEUR POUR RIRE AVEC LE CHAT - Duration: 2:43.

-------------------------------------------

For more infomation >> BONNE HUMEUR POUR RIRE AVEC LE CHAT - Duration: 2:43.

-------------------------------------------

Car Crash Gameplay - Cars for Kids. Gameplay for Kids/Android - Duration: 8:46.

Car Crash Gameplay - Cars for Kids. Gameplay for Kids/Android

For more infomation >> Car Crash Gameplay - Cars for Kids. Gameplay for Kids/Android - Duration: 8:46.

-------------------------------------------

For more infomation >> Car Crash Gameplay - Cars for Kids. Gameplay for Kids/Android - Duration: 8:46.

-------------------------------------------

How to Achieve Med School Goals

For more infomation >> How to Achieve Med School Goals

-------------------------------------------

Lab Notes - Eucalyptol Testing (Fail) - Dec 23, 2018 - Duration: 7:52.

Greetings fellow nerds.

I've been continuing to research the production of sodium these past couple of weeks using the alcohol catalyzed magnesium reduction approach.

We had a lot of problems but we worked through them.

Including trying to find a workable solvent, reaction times, processing methods in dioxane, preventing glassware destruction,

trying to dry the solvents using easy to obtain drying agents like aluminum and lithium metal.

Putting together our research into a mechanism.

And finally finding some very easy to obtain off the shelf catalysts like menthol, tetrahydrolinalool, dimetol and borneol.

Menthol in particular is a massive breakthrough in that it's extremely ubiquitous and this makes sodium production easy.

I can't emphasize how huge of a hurdle we've cleared by finding an off-the-shelf catalyst.

Now something i've been exploring is alternative solvents.

There are actually two solvents used in our sodium production process.

The reaction solvent that we actually perform the sodium production reaction in,

and the purification solvent where we separate sodium from the leftover magnesium as well as any bits of magnesium oxide.

For the reaction solvent we're currently using mineral oil or baby oil and to be honest, i don't think we're going to get much cheaper than that.

But maybe we can find a solvent that runs the reaction much faster.

A slightly higher expense would be justified in that case.

Now, for the purification solvent we're using dioxane.

Dioxane is easy to make for the amateur and we in fact did so ourselves in a previous video.

But because it's slightly carcinogenic it would be preferable to find an alternative.

Granted, substances like paint thinner and gasoline are probably even more carcinogenic, but still we want to try and reduce our exposure.

Anyway, it would be awesome if we could find a single solvent that does both.

Reaction and purification.

The reason why we can't use dioxane for the sodium production reaction is that the boiling point is too low.

We need to reach at least 160 celsius before the reaction even starts.

At 101 degrees celsius, the boiling point of dioxane is just not enough.

Higher pressure might work but the dangers aren't worth it for the amateur.

Anyway, a solvent i've been looking at is another essential oil, eucalyptol.

It's very easy to buy although it is somewhat expensive since we're using it as a solvent.

It has a nice high boiling point of 176 celsius.

While this is lower than our ideal temperature of 200 celsius, it should at least start.

What's most interesting is that it has a bridging ether group.

This makes eucalyptol a somewhat polar solvent and according to our mechanism,

most of the active species are polar so a polar solvent should speed up the reaction.

The ether group also makes eucalyptol an ethereal solvent similar to dioxane, so perhaps we can replicate the purifying properties as well.

Okay, enough talk, let's actually give it a try.

Now eucalyptol essential oil is not pure eucalyptol, it's usually just 80% or so eucalyptol.

So before we can do our testing we'll need to purify ourselves.

So to my 500mL of eucalyptol i'm adding in 10g of sodium metal.

Then i set up a reflux condenser and turned on stirring and heating to reflux.

What i'm doing is reacting the sodium with any impurities that can react with sodium.

If it reacts with sodium then we don't want it and if doesn't then it doesn't matter.

Now i know it seems circular to use sodium to purify a solvent with the intention of making sodium.

But right now we're just researching eucalyptol and if it does work, we can figure out alternative purification processes later.

Anyway, i left the eucalyptol to reflux overnight.

The next day i rearranged the apparatus to a distillation apparatus and distilled off the eucalyptol.

Anything that was destroyed by sodium would be left behind.

Now after i had distilled eucalyptol i decided to take a sample of 100mL and reflux it with 3g of sodium metal.

I wanted to see if there were any leftover impurities or if the eucalyptol itself slowly reacted with sodium.

You might not remember but several months ago when we began this project

it was determined that tetrahydronaphthalene could not be used as a solvent because it very slowly reacted with sodium to produce tar.

It was slow enough not to be noticed by myself or other amateurs during our early potassium work.

But was severely detrimental for making sodium.

Unfortunately after a few hours i started to see a color change.

Either there were impurities or eucalyptol was reacting.

So I refluxed the eucalyptol stock again over sodium overnight and again distilled it.

Once again i ran the test and again it was a failureů looks like the eucalyptol itself reacts with sodium.

This is not good.

But i noticed that the sodium still remained shiny rather than be covered with tar.

The side products of this decomposition seem to be different than with tetrahydronaphthalene.

While decomposition would certainly lower our sodium yield, maybe we can still use the solvent anyway.

So i decided to run the sodium production reaction anyway using a half-scale setup and a menthol catalyst.

I went through the drying and startup cycles as usual and interestingly enough i got successful hydrogen formation so it seemed like it was working.

Maybe eucalyptol is viable after all.

Now normally this would take around 30-40 hours to finish using a menthol catalyst.

But i noticed the reaction becoming very slow at just 14 hours.

Maybe most of it reacted.

But i waited until gas formation stopped completely at 24 hours to be certain.

After cooling i decanted the slurry and it looks like we got sodium.

This is the first working alternative solvent to mineral oil and it even works faster, completing the reaction in 14-24 hours.

This gives some evidence that a polar solvent helps to speed up the reaction

and we should look for that property in future alternative solvents.

Now looking at the sodium i can see that magnesium is still attached to it.

So as a purification solvent it doesn't seem to be working in situ.

But maybe the excessive amount of magnesium oxide by products was interfering.

So I added in fresh eucalyptol and refluxed it like i would with dioxane.

But after running it for four hours it was clear it wasn't working.

We can see the metal is still badly shaped indicating magnesium embedded in it.

I then added in dioxane this time and refluxed it and the magnesium separated out with the same efficiency as dioxane always provided.

I decanted off the sodium and we can see from the magnesium left behind that eucalyptol was not very effective if dioxane was able to remove this much.

So it's clear that eucalyptol fails as a purification solvent.

But we did learn something, the fact that an ethereal solvent fails to purify sodium means that ether functionality alone isn't enough.

Dioxane with its two ether groups might be special because it has chelating properties that eucalyptol does not have.

More testing will need to be done but we can start constructing a theory on that now that we have the eucalyptol results.

Anyway, as a reaction solvent, eucalyptol works very well and we even got 13.9g or about 94% yield.

So the decomposition must be happening very slowly.

But as a viable solvent for the amatuer i think eucalyptol isn't acceptable.

Without the crucial sodium purification property eucalyptol's only merit is that it's faster.

But considering how expensive it is and that we need to purify it first makes it less cost and labor effective than simply buying a better catalyst.

Nonetheless i still think these couple of weeks were time well-spent since the eucalyptol results help us learn more about the reaction conditions and mechanisms.

Anyway, thanks for watching.

Progress on the sodium project continues.

For more infomation >> Lab Notes - Eucalyptol Testing (Fail) - Dec 23, 2018 - Duration: 7:52.

-------------------------------------------

【番外編】母主のお気に入り映像 - Duration: 3:06.

Nice to meet you is his wife ^ ^ This time is the uncut version of the image used in the second work.

The fact that the camera was out of focus, my husband's tin hair reflected and it was unpublished.

For the image of my favorite Mamedaihuku, I will publish it. I am glad if you warmly watch.

Mamedaihuku is impatient for milk to drink soon…

My husband laughs in spite of seeing such a form:)

Thank you for watching until the end♡

Subscribe thank you♪

For more infomation >> 【番外編】母主のお気に入り映像 - Duration: 3:06.

-------------------------------------------

Tibia Quests | How to do the Warzones missions | SUBS ENG ESP POR - Duration: 7:58.

Hey guys what's up?

This time I want to show you how to do the Warzones Tasks, part of Bigfoot's Burden Quest

First find the Commander Stone, say Hi and Missions and click on their names:

Keeper, Spark, Extermination and Digging

To start head to the north of the base and enter here

In order to finish the digging task you need to make pigs walk over mold floor,

if you get truffles use the little pig on them, you need to do this three times

The extermination task consists on killing 10 Wigglers, there are a lot of them around

this place but be careful, they're strong and fast

I recommend you to have a dwarven ring ready in case Wyverns decide to troll a bit

As an extra tip, using fire walls may help you to keep the pigs close to specific mold

floor spots without dealing with their slow speed

Once you are done come here and find 7 crystalcrushers, but make sure they don't find you first

because they're powerful

kill them and use a gnomish extractor crystal on the corpses, 7 of them will be enough

to complete the mission

Also look around for damaged crystals and use the gnomish repair crystal on them,

there is a slight difference between damaged and normal ones as you can see,

you will need to repair 5 of them to get done

As long as you gain recognition among gnomes you will unlock new missions,

and by saying Hi and Missions you will be able to ask for Matchmaker and Repair (120 points)

and later for spore and grindstone (480 points)

To get the grindstone come here, there are a lot of fire creatures so be careful,

look for these strange stones and use them when they come to the surface,

which is every 75 seconds

it may take long so as an extra tip for lower levels I recommend to stay close

to a group of strange stones and track their cooldown

Head to the south east and enter here, Tinker task is quite simple look for damaged golems

and use the bell on them, you'll recognize them because they run away from

you if you're on lower levels killing here might not be a crazy idea because there are

a lot of golems there, it's up to you, you need 4 of them anyway

Do you remember the second place we went to?

Well Matchmaker is done there too, look for the red crystals and use the lonely crystal

on them until you find the right one, this might be dangerous on lower

levels so team up if necessary to do this

there is only one right red crystal and it shows some hearts when you find it

but it's not always the same

Last but not least, spores task is done here, get in and look for these puffball mushrooms

and use them, a color will appear, use the gnomish spore gatherer on the

following order: red, green, blue and yellow

If you use the wrong color you will start from the bottom

So this is it guys, after you complete all missions you will receive 12 minor crystalline

tokens and some gnomish supply packages

I hope it helps to understand how to do these tasks and see you on the next video

Thanks for watching guys! If you enjoyed the video, drop a Like, Subscribe if you are not and see you soon!

For more infomation >> Tibia Quests | How to do the Warzones missions | SUBS ENG ESP POR - Duration: 7:58.

-------------------------------------------

We Asked UFC Fighters What They Wanted From Santa This Year - Duration: 3:26.

For more infomation >> We Asked UFC Fighters What They Wanted From Santa This Year - Duration: 3:26.

-------------------------------------------

'Survivor' Finale Reunion: Why Is Alec Merlino Missing From The Live Show? - News Today - Duration: 3:32.

Those who tuned into the 'Survivor: David vs. Goliath' finale noticed one jury member missing from the live reunion show

So…where the heck was Alec Merlino!?  To kick off the final episode of Survivor: David vs

Goliath, host Jeff Probst came to viewers live from L.A., where the entire cast was gathered to watch the show and gear up for the final tribal council

However, when cameras panned to the jury members, there was one person not in attendance: Alec Merlino, the ninth person voted out of the game earlier this season

Jeff didn't acknowledge Alec's absence, and instead, just introduced the jury members as if everyone who was supposed to be there was there

Of course, this led to some confusion on social media.    Speculation that Alec might not be there for the live reunion began long before the season even started in September

The lovable competitor reportedly posted a photo of himself and fellow castmate, Kara Kay, to his Instagram page with the caption, "F*** it

" Since the cast for the new season hadn't been announced yet, this violated the NDA the contestants signed when they agreed to film the show, which said they could not follow each other on social media or post photos together, according to TMZ

 After the scandal, Alec deleted the photo from his Instagram, but the damage was already done

Producers reportedly disinvited him from the reunion show and decided to withhold all his appearance fees

However, since the penalty for violating the NDA was reportedly $5 million…this wasn't a majorly harsh deal for Alec

 When Alec was voted out of the game, he briefly addressed the controversy in an interview with Entertainment Weekly

"It's been the main bone of contention for my entire Survivor experience," he admitted

"The thing is, with social media, I feel things can be misconstrued, but I have nothing but respect for CBS, for Survivor, for Jeff

I went out there and had the experience of a lifetime. My biggest dream was to go out there and be on Survivor, so to go out there and have the experience, that's what I'm going to hold close to my heart and that's what I'm going to cherish

"

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét