Dis is it my friends. This bird looks pretty good by now and its the first one that comes with extra pair of sport wings for the same price. We cant wait to test it on the runway. Big salute to all RC lovers all over the world from Captain Blaž & Pilot Robert Slovenia. See you soon. Oh yeah...
For more infomation >> [승훈시 ATTACK] A#4 김승훈 (KIM SEUNGHUN) l YG보석함 - Duration: 1:22. 
For more infomation >> What's The Political Fallout From Robert Mueller's Flynn Memo For Trump? | The 11th Hour | MSNBC - Duration: 6:40. 
For more infomation >> Representative Jerry Nadler On Robert Mueller's New Flynn Revelations | The Last Word | MSNBC - Duration: 11:17. 
For more infomation >> 《倾城时光》金瀚放大招！林浅老婆使出雪烟绫，干掉老外独孤求败 - Duration: 14:40. 
For more infomation >> Court Doc Says Flynn Provided 'Substantial Assistance' To Robert Mueller | The 11th Hour | MSNBC - Duration: 10:11. 
For more infomation >> DCappella - All I Want for Christmas Is You - Duration: 3:57. 
For more infomation >> 레지던트 이블 2 - 에이다 웡 게임플레이 첫 공개 (한글자막) - Duration: 7:11. 
For more infomation >> #ЛОЛ ЧЕЛЛЕНДЖ ЛОЛ Одевалки Мультики про Куклы ЛОЛ Игрушки LOL Surprise dolls - Duration: 10:03. 
For more infomation >> FNN: Continuing to honor #Bush41; Phoenix Car Menorah Parade; LA police chase - Duration: 10:56:49. 
For more infomation >> Family of Boy Who Drowned Was Awarded $21.5 Million - Duration: 0:29. 
For more infomation >> State: Sacramento cannabis lab falsified records - Duration: 1:57. 
For more infomation >> Thái bình quê lúa//Quán bánh rán 30 năm tuổi tại Thái Bình - Duration: 12:58. 
For more infomation >> Cat stuck in tree Austell - Duration: 0:30. 
For more infomation >> IUBB - IU vs. Penn State Highlights (12/4/18) - Duration: 3:02. 
For more infomation >> WORLD TAG LEAGUE 2018 (December 04) - Post-match Interview [8th match] - Duration: 2:25. 
For more infomation >> Citroën C3 1.2 VTi Coll. Light ECC/ELEK. RAMEN + SPIEGELS/CC/6MND BOVAG GAR. - Duration: 0:49. 
For more infomation >> 曾經的國民閨女回來了，顏好演技佳還是學霸，關曉彤楊紫該緊張了 - Duration: 4:17. 
For more infomation >> Mazmur Tanggapan Minggu Adven III Tahun C - JenniferOdelia - Duration: 2:19. 
For more infomation >> MẪU CẮM HOA NHÀ THỜ 36|Cắm Lẳng Lá 2 tầng Mùa Vọng ,Mùa Chay - Duration: 13:40. 
For more infomation >> AI Powered Data Analysis and Visualization
For more infomation >> M-1王者・霜降り明星 大阪凱旋ライブは涙・涙・涙 - Duration: 3:06. 
For more infomation >> ナイツ塙、サンド富澤がM-1審査員として視聴者を唸らせた理由 - PN - Duration: 4:53. 
For more infomation >> 12.8 MEET THE IDOL 演出者シュークリームロケッツ（暫譯：泡芙火箭）向台灣朋友問好 - Duration: 1:25. 
Hello, world. Christian Truther here again, and I've got another video for you.
This is part 8 in my series on the shape of the world. Is it round or is it flat? Can
we determine what the objective truth is about that shape, because the shape is
what it is, regardless of what we think about it. Now, before I get into the topic
today, again, here are my ground rules. Very important to me, but I don't read
them aloud, so I expect you to read them. But the top two are my promise to you and
the bottom two are what I hold you guys accountable to in the comments section. As
always, this is unscripted. No green-screen or anything like that. I'm
not trying to improve my arguments through that sort of technological
polish. And I also always recommend watching my first video on this topic,
because in that video, I discussed why I'm doing this and what my methodology
is gonna be. I do tackle other topics in plenty of the other videos on this
list. Like I said, this is part eight of my series. This is gonna be the second
part on a celestial body movement. So I'm gonna aim arguments from each side at each
other and see which one stands. Now, originally I was not intending for this
to be a debunk video, but it kind of became that as I encountered some, some,
well, some thinking that's not accurate out there. So, let's start off. We're
looking at star movement. So, we're gonna see this is what reality is. And someone
was kind enough to do a time lapse with a 360 degree rig, so you can see
simultaneously, both hemispheres' movement. They're a little bit north of the
Equator...you can tell that through how the stars move and what stars are
visible and everything like that, but
this is going to be what is reality as far as what we see of star movement. So,
let's take a look here, as soon as YouTube loads up.
Okay, so I think that gets the point across clearly. As I said, they're a
little bit to the north of the Equator. You can see Polaris here and star trails
because it is a time-lapse sort of shot. We do see a good portion of the southern
hemisphere. Now, a couple words about; like I said, this is reality. This is what's
what's actually happening in the sky. I've heard one person say that modern
astronomy claims that the stars move counterclockwise in northern hemisphere
and clockwise in the southern hemisphere, but that would mean that it's
rising from the east to the west in the northern and going from the west to the
east in the southern. No, it's not. It's all coming from...
That's what modern astronomy is claiming, so please, don't don't say that anymore.
Modern astronomy is not saying that in the southern hemisphere stars are claimed to
be rising in the west and setting in the in the east. You just misunderstood what
clockwise and counterclockwise were. So, let's, let's take a look, though, at what
some other ideas are as far as what is causing the star movement. I have here a
very popular video by Eric Dubay, and,
yeah, let's see what he says. First of all, he says "Polaris is the only motionless
star in the heavens." No, it's not motionless. Actually, it wobbles. If you
take a...you're gonna need some magnification. You need a long, you know,
video time-lapse of it, but you will see it wobbles. Also, you're making this
claim thinking that Polaris doesn't move period, but it does. It in fact did.
We used to have a different North Star. Back when the Egyptians were raising
pyramids, they described a star called Thuban,
and it's in the constellation Draco, as the North Star. Polaris was out on the
outer ring. So, there is some wobble and it's, it's not
immovable. "Their relative positions if Earth was truly a tilting, wobbling,
spinning ball..." so he's, he's saying, basically, that the stars stay still
in their positions, despite the fact that we're moving. And to expound on that, he
says "If the earth is spinning at 1,000 miles per hour as it revolves around the
Sun at 66,600 miles per hour while the Sun shoots
through space at 450,000 miles per hour, why haven't the constellations
changed in thousands of years?" So again, they have. We have a different North Star.
Also, we occasionally lose stars through, like, supernova events and stuff like
that. And then, poof, they're gone. We don't see them anymore. But I understand what
you're saying! And the basic premise falls short, because you're not really
taking distance into account here. The distances involved are massive, and the
best I can explain it would be is if you were at the dock side of Seattle. And you
look over your, your shoulder to your left, and you saw the Seattle needle. Okay,
and it's an easily recognizable landmark. Now, if you moved quite quickly 20 feet
forward, and look left again, the Seattle needle basically wouldn't look
like it have changed position at all. But, yet, the shops around you have. And you
move forward another 40 feet. Same story. And a hundred feet, same story. You would have
to travel for a very, very very long time in order to be able to see any
perceptible movement of the Seattle needle, and it would be very small. It's
because distance relative to you; things close by will change a lot, things that
aren't close by don't change. So, that's why the Sun changes rapidly, the moon
changes rapidly in its position in the heavens, but these stars are so very far
away that, relative to us, we haven't moved hardly at all. And most of them are
caught, actually, they're in the same galaxy we are, so they're actually
spinning with us. It's not like we're the only things moving. They're moving as
well, and so it's, it's kind of... most of the stars we see that are visible in the sky
are in the same part of the galaxy we are in. And they're all moving, basically
in the same direction and roughly the same speed. So, the earth is rotating, and
that's why the stars are wheeling in the sky, night after night. We see this. So, this is,
this is flawed thinking. But, moving on, we then begin the perceptual basis
arguments, which is false. He's basically making the argument that you can't see
infinitely far. You've got a visual range, and you can't see infinitely far. You
can't see distance, really, at all! What you see is light striking your eyes.
And then, you brain is processing that information. So,
we see light at great distance. An example of this would be lighthouses.
You don't see them, but you see the light flashing first, okay, as the ship is
approaching, they would see the light flashing first. The light was striking
your eyes, so even though we couldn't resolve the object out there, we could
have seen the light. And that's what you see. You see light striking your eyes and
it doesn't matter from what distance it's coming, as long as the light comes to
your eyes in sufficient quantity to be registered, you will see it. Okay, so, light
doesn't just stop working that way. Our eyes don't just stop processing because
it's a certain distance away. They don't know that. It's the light, it gets to our
eyes, and we see it. Okay, so there's not a perceptual range challenge here. The
vanishing point is not an issue if light is getting to our eyes in sufficient
quantities. We will see it, period, end of story.
And then he goes on to say, well you know, South is on these edges, and this is
gonna be a real problem. Because, remember reality, all right? Um, I'll just back up
there real quick. Tight arcs. Shallow arcs.
Polar tight arcs. Okay, and I'm going to show you a video real quick of the
Southern Cross, as well. All right, I'm gonna trace the Southern Cross here.
It's right here. Okay, and it's pointing south for us... that's
why they call it the Southern Cross. Not just because it's in the Southern
Hemisphere. So, there's a lot of problems with that. You've got polar movement.
You've got the fact that no matter where you were, those four guys facing south,
and facing vastly different areas of the south, but for most of the night, most of
the night, again, I'll grant you not necessarily all the night, but for most
of night, all four of those guys see the same Southern Cross. That shouldn't be
possible on a flat disc, with south being all the way around the rim. But, whether
you're in Chile, or Australia, or South Africa, you can see the Southern Cross
for most of the evening. That's just reality. Now, this guy had
what appears to be a fairly ingenious setup. And I took a shot of him from, from
the top first. So, he's got the su... South American, South American, sorry, southern
constellations on the top disc, and the northern constellations on the bottom. He
put the camera right about the equatorial point, similar to what we saw
in that shot, and his argument is that the this disc is inside a dome. The dome
creates a reflection event at nighttime, and what we see are the stars on the
southern being reflected down. It's a decent argument. And let's take a look at what
it looks like. He zoomed it in so you can see it better, but certainly, as this
spins this way, this will spin this way. And it does kind of mimic what we see as
far as star patterns, and you get a polar event.
Great job! Oh, by the way, we do have a South Pole star, but its magnitude is so
dim that it's very difficult to see without without visual aids. Certainly, a
long exposure shot would be able to see it. There is a star currently
occupying the South Pole. I do want to cover that before we get too much
further. It does exist, though. But here's what you don't see. The stars that were
in the center on both. You would have, absolutely and necessarily, you would
have divergence points with this sort of setup, and we don't see that in reality.
So, again, this isn't, this is not accurate. It was,
I mean, it's a clever enough little contraption you put together there, but
it doesn't match reality. Then, someone said, "Well, you know, what if you put a
dome over, and the lights are on the outside... it can create polar sorts of events." The
problem with this: Not only do we not see trails all the time, as this is kind of
showing, but more importantly, the poles are at either side of this. But what do
we ,see supposedly, on the Flat Earth map? You'd see a pole here, and then, somehow, a
polar event occurring simultaneously on all sides of it. And that doesn't work
out. Not with this. So, not even a dome magnifier is answering the question of
how we see the reality of how stars move. So, the truth is that the world is round,
and that's why we see the stars revolve the way they do. And the reason they
don't seem to change very quickly; you're hardly at all as far as the relative
positions of the constellations to us, is because we're all moving at roughly the
same speed, in roughly the same direction. Night after night, year after year. But
things do change, things have subtly changed.
We've got a new North Star. We expect in a little while longer, it will be
actually a great while longer, we expect another North Star to take that one's
place. Supernovas happen, and stars disappear. These things happen, and it's
not completely unchanging over time. The truth is, the world is round, and it will
set you free. This is Christian Truther, signing out.
Đăng ký:
Đăng Nhận xét (Atom)
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét