Thứ Tư, 28 tháng 2, 2018

Youtube daily report Feb 28 2018

Jacques: The beat to Nipsey Hussle's "Hussle & Motivate" from his long-anticipated album,

'Victory Lap,' has quite the back story.

The song is based on a slowed down sample of JAY-Z'S 1998 hit, "Hard Knock Life"

which in turn flipped the iconic 1977 Broadway show, "Annie."

Jacques: However, Nipsey's explanation of how he cleared the sample is pretty interesting.

Charlamagne: Did you have to clear that, who'd you have to clear that with?

Nipsey Hussle: JAY-Z.

Hussle: When JAY-Z got Annie to clear the record,

I guess when he paid him, he said, 'Y'all gotta let every other rap artist after me use this.'

Charlamagne: Wow!

Hussle: Yeah.

Jacques: Genius spoke to sample clearance executive David Georgeff at Warner Chappell,

the publishing company that handles the rights for both "Annie"

and JAY-Z's "Hard Knock Life."

He said, quote:

It comes down to property ownership and JAY-Z doesn't own the property of Charles Strouse.

Strouse composed the original "Annie" score along with songwriter Martin Charnin.

So how do you clear a sample?

Well, you have to get permission from the folks who own the original master recording

and the song's writers.

In Nipsey's case, he cleared the master recording with JAY-Z

and the original writers of "Annie."

It's complicated.

But in Hov's first letter to Strouse and Charnin to request clearance for "Annie's"

"It's A Hard Knock Life," he included an anecdote of a young Shawn seeing the show on Broadway

- but in his book, 'Decoded,' he admitted that he lied.

He said quote:

"Of course, I'd never been to see "Annie" on Broadway.

But I had seen the movie on TV.

Anyway, they bought it, cleared it, and I had one of my biggest hits."

Charnin told Vibe in 1999 that Jay-Z paid him $25 to 50 thousand dollars,

plus a standard per unit rate.

"Hard Knock Life" was Jay-Z's mainstream breakout hit,

peaking at no.15 on Billboard's Hot 100 and it's still making waves for Nipsey today.

Nipsey Hussle did not respond for comment by press time.

Jacques: I'm Jacques Morel with Genius News.

Bringing you the meaning and the knowledge behind the music. Peace!

For more infomation >> JAY-Z, Nipsey Hussle & How To Clear An "Annie" Sample | Genius News - Duration: 2:28.

-------------------------------------------

Trump slams AG Jeff Sessions over surveillance abuse probe - Duration: 3:31.

For more infomation >> Trump slams AG Jeff Sessions over surveillance abuse probe - Duration: 3:31.

-------------------------------------------

Hope Hicks resigns as White House communications director - Duration: 4:42.

For more infomation >> Hope Hicks resigns as White House communications director - Duration: 4:42.

-------------------------------------------

Why You SHOULDN'T Confess Your Feelings to Your Crush 🤐 - Duration: 5:36.

Heya playa have you ever wanted to tell your crush how you felt but you weren't sure whether

you should do it directly as in tell them to their face or indirectly as in give them

a note?

Well dark_memes_1226 asked me this "Do you think writing a note to your crush is a good

thing to do or will it be bad?".

I have pretty mixed thoughts on that but I'm gonna share them with you right after this.

This is The Josh Speaks.

You're watching The Josh Speaks.

For those of you that are new here, my name is Josh and every single Monday through Friday

I make videos sharing tips, ideas and stories teaching you how to be your best self.

When it comes to giving your crush a note to express how you feel, I've had a bad experience

with that.

I go way more in-depth in another video as to how and why I chose that method but ultimately

it didn't work out for me.

She ended up reading my note and realizing "Wow, I really only see this guy as a friend"

and that was it for me.

But I do want to get into being direct vs. indirect so let's cover indirect first.

Giving your crush a note or telling someone else to tell your crush how you feel.

I don't think these methods are good ones and the simple reason is because you're not

allowing your crush to see that you're confident enough to approach them and talk to them yourself.

Instead, what you're doing is your finding a shield to protect yourself.

You're kind of putting your feelings out there and hoping that whatever your crush has to

say, whether it's good or bad won't come and make you feel embarrassed in the moment.

By writing them a note and slipping it in their locker or sending them a huge text message

expressing how you feel.

Both of these indirect methods simply show your crush that hey, I'm not ready to approach

you, I'm not ready to build something in person I'm hoping that I can just kind of pose this

yes or no question to you and hopefully it's yes.

You're essentially flipping a coin and hoping for it to land on heads.

And the problem with flipping a coin is that your odds are the same for you to lose as

they are to win.

You're simply posing a yes or no question and by doing it indirectly, you're even removing

yourself from the equation of having an influencing factor to help your crush lean more towards

yes.

So let me give you an example.

Let's say there's someone that you really really like and you don't really talk to them

as often.

Maybe you guys interact once in a while in a friend group or in class and things like

that but you're not really that close with them.

Well, you like them and you want to approach them and tell them how you feel but you're

too nervous to do it.

You're too nervous to even start a conversation with them so what do you decide to do?

You weigh your options and decide that the easiest thing for you to do is to write a

note, pass it off and hope for the best.

But when your crush gets that note, opens it up and reads it they're really not gonna

see the heart and feeling that you've put into it and how you feel on the other side

because all they have is a piece of paper to show that.

So most likely what they're going to feel is wow, this person put their heart on this

piece of paper.

This is a lot of pressure on me because I need to decide what I want to do and I don't

really know this person that well but they really like me so I'm probably going to take

the easy road myself and to say no.

You took the easy road and they took the easy road, nothing was accomplished here simply

because no one wanted to really make that first in person move.

So what you're saying is you should just tell your crush directly how you feel, right?

Not exactly.

Even that holds it's own weight of problems.

If you were to confidently walk up to your crush and say "Hey, I like you.

Let's go out some time."

Sure, there's a chance that they may say yes but there's also a lot of other contributing

factors that will probably push them towards no.

The first is that there's all these strangers and people watching to see what their reaction

is, second could be that their friends are there and they don't want to do anything in

front of their friends and the third may be that they're not sure if they could actually

go out.

They need to talk to their parents or maybe they need to balance it with their schoolwork

and get things in order so just kind of directly telling them just like that might not work.

Plus it puts a lot of pressure on the person that you're sharing your feelings with.

Can you imagine someone walking up to you and saying "Hey, I like you.

I don't really know you that well, we're not really that close but I like you.

So decide what you want to do with that information right now".

So wait a second, telling your crush indirectly that you like them is not good.

Telling your crush directly that you like them is not good either.

So what are you supposed to do?

How should I tell my crush that I like them?

Give it some time, there's no need to rush into telling someone how you feel.

What I always say is this, you're better off showing your crush how you feel rather than

telling them how you feel.

And the way to show them how you feel is to ask them to hang out, to spend time getting

to know them, learning a little bit more about their personalities and hobbies and their

interests and really just showing an investment in them as a person.

The more time you spend building that deeper connection with them the easier it'll be for

both of you to be on the same page when you are ready to express your feelings so that

no one's doing it out of the blue and it's just weird and it's awkward.

You avoid all of that just by taking the time to get to know them.

So try to move away from that black and white type of thinking.

You know what I mean, the kind of approach where you're like "Well, I like this person.

I'm gonna ask them out.

If they say yes, then things are good.

If they say no, then things are bad.

If they say no then I just move on.

It doesn't have to be like that.

Spend a little bit more time investing, getting to know them, that's how you're really going

to increase your chances of success.

What do you think though, is there a person that you have a crush on and you're not really

sure how to go about telling them or even showing them?

Leave your comments down below and we'll talk about it.

Now if you're in a situation that you don't really want to make public in the YouTube

comments, you can always shoot me a DM over on Snapchat or Instagram.

I do my best to answer as many messages as I can.

Otherwise thank you so much for watching.

If you found this video to be helpful, hit the thumbs up button.

If you're new here, make sure to subscribe but definitely check out the videos over there

on the side where I go more in depth on this topic of telling your crush hwo you feel and

why I don't think that's such a good idea.

Watch those videos, I think they'll help you out.

On that note guys, I'll catch you next time.

As always, love and peace.

For more infomation >> Why You SHOULDN'T Confess Your Feelings to Your Crush 🤐 - Duration: 5:36.

-------------------------------------------

Trump: I told the NRA 'we're gonna stop this nonsense' - Duration: 17:55.

For more infomation >> Trump: I told the NRA 'we're gonna stop this nonsense' - Duration: 17:55.

-------------------------------------------

Deep Rock Galactic - Gameplay Trailer - Duration: 2:50.

[Suspenseful music begins]

Dwarf: Here we go!

Dwarf: Damn!

Dwarf: I'm full, where's Molly?

Dwarf: Rock and Stone!

[Music gets more epic and intense]

[XBOX SOUND]

For more infomation >> Deep Rock Galactic - Gameplay Trailer - Duration: 2:50.

-------------------------------------------

Introducing Pololu's Tic Stepper Motor Controllers - Duration: 1:01.

Using stepper motors in your project is now easier than ever with Pololu's

line of tick stepper motor controllers. These versatile general-purpose modules

support six different control interfaces: USB for direct connection to a computer,

TTL serial and I²C for use with a microcontroller,

RC hobby servo pulses for use in an RC system,

analog voltages for use with a potentiometer or analog joystick,

and quadrature encoder for use with a rotary encoder dial.

Visit pololu.com/tic to buy your new stepper motor controller today.

For more infomation >> Introducing Pololu's Tic Stepper Motor Controllers - Duration: 1:01.

-------------------------------------------

No bond for chainsaw attack suspect - Duration: 2:23.

For more infomation >> No bond for chainsaw attack suspect - Duration: 2:23.

-------------------------------------------

Students return to Stoneman Douglas - Duration: 2:23.

For more infomation >> Students return to Stoneman Douglas - Duration: 2:23.

-------------------------------------------

Department Press Briefing - February 27, 2018 - Duration: 42:20.

MS NAUERT: Hi, everyone.

Good afternoon.

I'm so sorry for the delay today.

My apologies.

A couple announcements I'd like to get started with today.

First, this is coming in from our folks who are in Afghanistan now, from the Acting Assistant

Secretary Alice Wells, who is traveling in the region for the Kabul process:

Delegations from the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, the Republic of India, and the United States

of America met today, February 27th, in Kabul on the margins of the Kabul Process Conference

for the fourth round of U.S.-India-Afghanistan trilateral consultations.

Afghan Deputy Foreign Minister Hekmat Karzai, Indian Ministry of External Affairs Joint

Secretary Deepak Mittal, and U.S. South and Central Asia Senior Bureau Official Alice

Wells met to discuss U.S. and Indian civilian assistance to Afghanistan, as well as regional

issues of mutual interest to the three countries.

All sides welcomed discussions focused on political, economic, educational, and developmental

goals and agreed that trilateral cooperation strengthens the economic and regional stability

across many sectors in Afghanistan.

The United States, Afghanistan, and India should continue and increase initiatives that

support economic and developmental reforms in Afghanistan.

All sides agreed to continue to work together toward a safe, peaceful, democratic, pluralistic,

and prosperous Afghanistan that is free from terrorism.

They agreed that the dialogue continues to advance shared values and goals, and decided

that the next meeting should take place on the margins of the United Nations General

Assembly in September later this year.

Secondly, I'd like to say that the United States is shocked and saddened by the murder

of a Slovak investigative reporter named Jan Kuciak, and also his partner Martina Kusnirova.

We extend our deepest condolences to their family, friends, loved ones, as well as Mr.

Kuciak's colleagues at Aktuality.sk.

That is a new site in Slovakia.

There appears to be evidence that the murder was connected to his work as an investigative

journalist.

If that is true, we echo the prime minister's statement that this is an unprecedented attack

on freedom of the press and democracy in Slovakia.

Journalists must be able to work freely and safely to safeguard open and democratic societies.

The crime calls for a swift, determined investigation to bring those responsible to justice.

Next, I'd like to say that the United States is deeply concerned by the death of a Georgian

citizen, Archil Tatunashvili, during his February 22nd arrest and detention in the Russian-occupied

Georgian territory of South Ossetia.

We express our condolences to his family.

The United States is also deeply concerned by the arrest of other Georgian citizens,

Levan Kutashvili and Ioseb Pavliashvili, and call for them to be allowed to return freely

across the administrative boundary line.

The United States calls for a full accounting of circumstances of the tragic incident and

continues to encourage all sides to agree on additional measures to strengthen mutual

confidence and transparency in the affected region.

Next, on Yemen, I know a lot of you are interested in what's going on in Yemen.

I want to share with you that the Hodeidah Port, which is the largest port in the country,

now remains open.

It has been open since December the 21st.

You may recall that the Government of Saudi Arabia initially – pardon me – reopened

Hodeidah for a minimum of 30 days back in December.

We strongly commend the Saudi-led coalition's decision to keep the port open.

The gesture signals the coalition's serious intent to support the international community's

efforts to address the humanitarian crisis in Yemen.

Hodeidah is the country's largest port and is a critical entry point for much needed

humanitarian aid, commercial goods, including food, fuel, and also medicine.

We urge commercial shippers to continue to use Hodeidah Port and U.S.

Government-funded cranes to transport vital supplies into the country.

And then lastly, later this week, on Thursday afternoon at the White House, our Deputy Secretary

John Sullivan will participate in the White House Cabinet-Level Opioid Summit to publicly

highlight the agencies that are paying a – playing a key role in addressing America's opioid

crisis.

At the summit, Deputy Secretary Sullivan will join Department of Homeland Security Secretary

Kristjen Nielsen and the Attorney General Jeff Sessions on a law enforcement panel to

discuss the State Department's aggressive global counter-drug efforts to stop the overseas

supply of illicit opioids.

Since the vast majority of illicit opioids like heroine and fentanyl come from overseas,

the State Department has a crucial role to play in stopping the sources of supply as

part of the broader U.S.

Government effort.

According to the most recent CDC data, in 2016, nearly 64,000 Americans died from drug

overdoses, and two-thirds of those were from opioids.

In response to the epidemic, the State Department is leveraging its partnerships in Mexico and

China and the broader international community to choke off illicit supplies.

We are supporting Mexican authorities' efforts to more aggressively eradicate poppy crops,

build law enforcement capacity, enhance border security, and also bring transnational criminal

organizations and drug traffickers to justice.

Energized by President Trump's visit to China last November, we're building a more

productive relationship with China to address the synthetic drug problem.

As a result of our cooperation, China has established domestic restrictions on the production

and distribution of 143 substances, including a number of Fentanyl-related compounds.

On Thursday we'd be more than happy to share the remarks of the deputy secretary after

his meetings at the White House.

And with that, I'd be happy to take your questions.

Josh.

QUESTION: Sure.

Thanks, Heather.

I want to talk about Syria, but before I do I wanted to know if I could defer to my colleague

from NPR, who I know is under a tight deadline today, and then if you could come back to

us.

MS NAUERT: That's so nice of you.

Hi, Michele.

QUESTION: Back here.

Thank you.

I'd like to ask about Joseph Yun's departure.

Why now, just when North Korea is indicating its willingness to talk?

And how do you keep open channels of communication with Pyongyang without an experienced diplomat

like Joseph Yun in that position?

MS NAUERT: Well, again, first I would say that we want to thank Joe Yun for his many

years of service here at the State Department.

Many of you know him as someone who handled some of our North Korea issues, as well as

somebody who helped facilitate the bringing home of Otto Warmbier last year.

He also has served as an ambassador.

So we want to thank him for his many years and congratulate him for his many years of

service.

The State Department has 75,000 people that work for us around the world.

To imply that Ambassador Yun is the only one who's capable of handling North Korea would

simply be wrong.

We have a deep bench of very experienced people.

Our Acting Assistant Secretary Susan Thornton, who is now a nominee to be the assistant secretary

for East Asia Pacific, for EAP, is more than capable of handling that job.

She is a fantastic diplomat and well-respected across the Foreign Service and across the

world as well.

In addition to her we have Marc Knapper, who serves in South Korea.

He is very experienced in these matters.

And we have our Director for Korea Policy Mark Lambert here at the State Department.

Some of you, I know, have had the chance to meet him as he's briefed some people on

issues related to the DPRK.

This was a personal decision.

It's something that Ambassador Yun had made clear to the State Department.

He had a conversation with Secretary Tillerson about it.

We are certainly sorry to see him go, but we are fully confident that we have terrific,

qualified, experienced people who will take this on and continue our maximum pressure

campaign.

Our policy has not changed.

We continue to push ahead and forge ahead with our maximum pressure campaign.

That extends well beyond the State Department, also to the Department of Treasury, the White

House, the NSC, and other cabinet departments as well.

QUESTION: Are you going to replace that position, though?

Because that was someone dedicated to the – of having openings, and he was the one

who was going up to New York for the New York channel as well.

MS NAUERT: Look, we have other people who are fully capable of having conversations

with any other country, whether it's North Korea or another nation, if that instance

arises and if it's appropriate to do so.

So just because Ambassador Yun has decided to retire – and I want to congratulate him

on his decision to retire.

After working in any one place for 34 years, I imagine you're ready to move on to your

next chapter.

We look forward to having Susan Thornton and also our other colleagues fill in on the gap.

Okay?

Anything else related to North Korea before we move on to other issues?

QUESTION: Yes, Heather.

North Korea.

MS NAUERT: Okay, we'll do North Korea, and then we'll move on to something else.

Hi, Janne.

How are you?

QUESTION: Hi, thank you.

I have two question for you.

MS NAUERT: Yes.

QUESTION: Yesterday President Trump said that United States will talk to the North Korea

under appropriate conditions.

What is the appropriate conditions?

Number two, second question: The U.S. has preconditions for the talk with North Korea,

but North Korea have no preconditioned talk with United States.

MS NAUERT: Our condition is denuclearization.

Our policy has not changed.

We have talked about this policy since day one of this administration; and that's maximum

pressure, but it's also the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula.

Let me remind you it's something that China agrees with, it's something that South Korea

and Japan agree with, it's something that Russia agrees with, along with many other

countries – the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula, and we stand firmly behind

that.

Okay?

QUESTION: But the U.S. mention about the appropriate conditions?

President mentioned that.

MS NAUERT: Look, we would certainly talk about the steps that one would take to get to denuclearization.

And that's it.

I'll leave it at that.

Okay, anything else on – anything else on North Korea?

QUESTION: On North Korea.

MS NAUERT: Okay.

Hi.

QUESTION: And kind of Syria-related.

There's a report in The New York Times that North Korea has been shipping supplies to

Syria that can be used in or for producing chemical weapons.

I wanted to know, if you are familiar with that report, what your reaction is to it.

MS NAUERT: Sure.

I've certainly seen that report.

That is something – I've seen reports of that report – let me say that, because

the actual report itself has not been released.

This is something that the United States has had concerns about for quite some time that

North Korea, especially as North Korea becomes more desperate, that they look for different,

creative, and horrific ways to try to make money to fund their criminal regime.

And when I say criminal regime, I mean their illegal nuclear and ballistic missile programs.

If they are selling goods, material, whatever you want to call it to Syria, it shows the

depravity of that regime.

And that is exactly why we stand so firmly behind our policy of denuclearization on the

part of this administration and on behalf of the world.

Okay.

Anything else on North Korea?

QUESTION: (Off-mike) --

QUESTION: Syria.

MS NAUERT: Okay.

Okay, hold on.

QUESTION: -- can I just --

MS NAUERT: Yeah, go ahead.

Kylie, hold on.

QUESTION: I just want to clarify, when Michele asked about if you're going to actually

be filling the North Korea envoy position that Joe Yun had, you didn't give a direct

answer.

So are there plans to fill that and the person hasn't been chosen yet, or is there consideration

to get rid of the position fully?

MS NAUERT: I believe that – in addition to having our people, who are fully qualified

and capable of picking up the work and handling that work, we have not selected another person,

but there is another office that will be handling some of the humanitarian issues, which was

some of – a part of some of his portfolio.

So we have somebody else under a different under secretary in this department.

I'd have to check exactly which one it is, but we do have somebody else lined up to handle

some of those humanitarian issues.

QUESTION: And that's for the long term, or for the interim?

MS NAUERT: I don't know if that structure will hold over the very long term, but at

least for now, that that will be the case.

Okay.

QUESTION: But your going from having an envoy for North Korea to not having an envoy for

North Korea should not be seen, just as the North Koreans are coming out and saying that

they're interested in talking to the U.S., as a sign that we're not interested in that?

You would push us away from reading into the fact that you're going from having an envoy

to not having an envoy for that specific purpose --

MS NAUERT: The top national security issue for this administration has been and remains

to this day the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula, working on the maximum pressure

campaign to try to stop North Korea from developing its ballistic and nuclear weapons programs.

That is clear all along.

If somebody chooses to retire, that does not change our policy.

This is not a change in our policy or our intent in pushing forward with that policy

in any way.

Okay.

QUESTION: Can we go to Syria now?

MS NAUERT: Yeah, sure.

Anybody else on North Korea?

QUESTION: (Off-mike.)

MS NAUERT: Okay.

Wait, hold on.

You had --

QUESTION: Can I have one?

QUESTION: I have a very quick one.

MS NAUERT: Yes, and then we'll go – then we'll get on to Syria.

QUESTION: Did Secretary Tillerson ask him to stay, given we're at a very critical

moment with North Korea and given – if you really value his experience, did the Secretary

ask him to stay?

MS NAUERT: The Secretary reluctantly accepted his request to retire.

When somebody comes to you and says, "Hey, look, I really want to retire.

I've been here 34 years and I want to spend time with my family," it's hard to argue

against that.

Our policy has not changed.

The Secretary is certainly not going to force somebody to stay on the job.

We thank him for his many years of service.

He was very good at what he did.

He is very well respected across the administration and in other places as well, but I feel fully

confident that we have the appropriate people in place who can handle everything he did

and more.

Our policy remains the same.

We are just as engaged in North Korea.

Taking one person out of the mix does not change things in any way.

Okay?

QUESTION: Heather, one more question.

MS NAUERT: Go ahead.

QUESTION: Can we move on?

QUESTION: The Washington Post reported that Ambassador Yun's departure, quote, "reflects

widespread frustration within the State Department at diplomats' relative lack of power in

the Trump administration."

Do you have any response to this sentiment, that the State Department lacks sway within

the administration?

MS NAUERT: I would say that that's wrong.

It's altogether wrong, and here's why: Our maximum pressure campaign has been successful.

We have seen that North Korea has had to go to extreme ends to try to get money to fund

its weapons programs, okay.

That's first and foremost.

Secondly, we have succeeded at bringing many countries on board in working on our maximum

pressure campaign.

That has influence, the fact that the State Department and other leaders are leading on

this issue of denuclearization on the Korean Peninsula.

The President, of course, spearheads that.

It's also backed by the Vice President; it's backed by Secretary Mattis, Secretary

Tillerson, National Security Advisor McMaster, and also Nikki Haley as well, Ambassador Haley.

So across the administration, we have many people who are engaged in this.

We cannot say that diplomacy is failing.

We are succeeding.

Is it taking a lot longer than we would like?

Of course.

But diplomacy is not something that happens overnight.

So this – our program continues.

Our – the work that we are doing here at the State Department continues, and I can

assure anyone who has any questions about that that that is valued by this administration,

by the evidence of where we are today.

Okay.

Let's move on.

QUESTION: Syria.

MS NAUERT: You want to go to Syria.

QUESTION: So the ceasefire that the United Nations has agreed on – what is the U.S.

understanding about what part or parts of Syria that ceasefire covers?

MS NAUERT: So let me refer you to the resolution itself, which I have a copy of and I can read

part of that.

But the resolution itself, the ceasefire that 15 countries, members of the United Nations

Security Council, all unanimously agreed upon calls for a ceasefire throughout Syria.

There are some exemptions – exemptions to al-Nusrah Front, al-Qaida, and also ISIS.

Okay, they are considered the groups and entities that coalition partners and others can go

after.

Other than that, the UN agreed to – the Security Council agreed to a ceasefire.

That happened on Saturday.

It took far too long to get that ceasefire into effect.

We've been calling that – for that for quite some time, as have many other countries.

I want to point out some of the countries that are backing that ceasefire: China, France,

Russia, the United Kingdom, the United States, Bolivia, Cote d'Ivoire, Equatorial Guinea,

Ethiopia, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Netherlands, Peru, Poland, and Sweden.

All of those countries coming together to call for a ceasefire in Syria.

Why are they doing that?

Well, we are watching what is going on – and I spoke to this on Thursday – the horrific

attacks taking place against civilians in Eastern Ghouta.

It is not too dissimilar from what happened last year in Aleppo.

It is horrific.

I will point out, though, that Russia supported the ceasefire.

Russia is certainly not adhering to the ceasefire.

They're not adhering to the ceasefire because they continue to sponsor and back Bashar al-Assad's

government.

That is tragic.

As a result of that, we are seeing innocent civilians – and you've all seen the video.

Many of you are parents; you have seen the children who are suffering and dying.

You've seen the innocent people doing that.

The world has come together.

The world has said that this has to stop.

I find it ironic when Russia calls for a humanitarian road, a humanitarian zone.

You know what the humanitarian zone is?

It's the entirety of Syria, not just one little area that Russia cutely tries to carve

out.

It should be the entire country, because that is what Russia and those 15[i] other countries

agreed to in the UN Security Council resolution.

QUESTION: So you said the entirety of Syria.

Would you agree that the district of Afrin is in Syria?

MS NAUERT: The district – yes, if you look at a map, it is certainly within Syria, yes.

QUESTION: So then when Turkey says that it is not bound by the ceasefire and is free

to continue going after the Kurds there, would you agree that Turkey is violating the UN

ceasefire?

MS NAUERT: I would encourage Turkey to go back and read this resolution, the unanimously

agreed upon resolution on Saturday, and I will quote some of this to you – I won't

read the entire thing to you – "demands that all parties cease hostilities without

delay and engage immediately to ensure full and comprehensive implementation of this demand

by all parties for a durable humanitarian pause for at least 30 consecutive days throughout

Syria to enable the safe, unimpeded, and sustained delivery of humanitarian aid and services

and medical evacuations of the critically sick and wounded in accordance with applicable

international law."

Hold on.

Let me get to that point.

"It affirms that the cessation of hostilities shall not apply to military operations against

the Islamic State of Iraq in the Levant, ISIL, also known as Daesh, al-Qaida, and al-Nusrah

Front, and all other individuals, groups, undertakings, and entities associated with

al-Qaida and ISIL and other terror groups as designated by the Security Council."

So I think the resolution was clear here in naming exactly which groups are considered

to be exempt from the ceasefire.

QUESTION: So if our NATO ally Turkey is going to flout this UN ceasefire, then why should

Russia feel more bound by it than Turkey does?

MS NAUERT: Russia signed on to this.

That's first of all.

Russia signed on to this as an entity that agreed to this UN Security Council resolution.

Let me remind you also that Russia had agreed to help, years ago, Syria with getting rid

of its chemical weapons.

Russia has failed to do that.

I want to point that out as well.

Turkey is more than welcome to go back and read the exact text of this UN Security Council

resolution, and I would suggest that they do so.

Okay?

QUESTION: Can we move on, please?

MS NAUERT: We probably have a few more questions.

Laurie, go right ahead.

QUESTION: Would you encourage Turkey to reach some sort of ceasefire in Afrin?

MS NAUERT: I would encourage Turkey to go and read this resolution, see what the world

and the international community is saying about this.

QUESTION: It sounds like that – if I could ask you about Masrour Barzani and the Iraqi

issue of the airports.

Masrour Barzani, who is chancellor, as you know, of the Kurdistan Region Security Council

is here.

He met with people at the White House and in this building.

He was told repeatedly the U.S. supports a strong, united Kurdistan and a federal, democratic

Iraq.

But just yesterday the prime minister extended this ban on Kurdish airports for another three

months.

Do you have any comment on that?

Is it consistent with your policy?

MS NAUERT: It's consistent with what we've said all along, that we would encourage the

Regional Government of Kurdistan and also the Iraqi Government to sit down and have

talks.

We are – want them to resolve their remaining differences.

They haven't done enough, certainly, to do that, to resolve those remaining differences.

But we also believe that they have to swiftly compromise as a sign of good faith.

So we would encourage them to sit down and have talks and figure this thing out.

QUESTION: Are you disappointed in the renewal of this airport ban?

MS NAUERT: Look, I think that's up for them to decide, but we have made our positions

clear with both the Iraqi Government and the Kurds as well, okay?

QUESTION: Afghanistan?

QUESTION: Can we move on to the --

MS NAUERT: Okay.

Okay.

Okay.

QUESTION: Yeah.

I want to ask you about the embassy --

MS NAUERT: Yes.

QUESTION: -- moving of the American embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.

Was the Secretary of State consulted on the timing?

Was he consulted that the embassy will be moved on the 14th of May?

MS NAUERT: The Secretary has been involved in this process all along.

All along.

QUESTION: Right, but – but is it – yeah, all along.

So – but isn't that in contradiction of what he said like three weeks ago when he

said that this is going to take three years, four years down the line; this not going to

be happening anytime soon?

MS NAUERT: No --

QUESTION: Isn't that in contradiction with what he said?

MS NAUERT: That is not what the Secretary said.

When we first announced --

QUESTION: Right.

MS NAUERT: -- that we would be moving our embassy, we said it could take up to a certain

number of years.

And the fact that we were able to come up with a different kind of process, a different

type of structure right now, is just an extension of what the Secretary had said back then.

The Secretary signed off on the security details of this.

You all very well know that the Secretary puts safety and security as his top issue

for our personnel and for American citizens.

QUESTION: So it's not done in any way to sort of help an embattled Israeli prime minister?

MS NAUERT: I'm sorry?

QUESTION: It's not done in any way to help an embattled or besieged Israeli prime minister,

who is under charges of corruption?

MS NAUERT: Oh, goodness no.

I mean, this is something that the U.S.

Government has been talking – the President talked about this on the campaign trail as

he was running for President.

QUESTION: Right, right.

But it's quite a departure from the time that the President set this on this – on

September – December 6th and now.

I mean, we were talking about three, four years down the line.

Now it's done by May 15th.

MS NAUERT: I think I answered that question --

QUESTION: Okay.

MS NAUERT: -- that initially, depending on where we decided to put this and how we decided

to structure a facility, it could take up to that period of time.

We have settled, at least for now, on our new embassy in Jerusalem, and it's also

– it coincides with Israel's 70th anniversary.

QUESTION: Okay.

Now, let me ask you couple of things, with my colleagues' indulgence, on this very

issue.

MS NAUERT: Okay.

QUESTION: Now, the consulate in Jerusalem has always worked as some sort of a diplomatic

mission to the Palestinians.

Now, I know in your statement you said that it will continue to have that mandate.

How will that work out?

How does it work out?

MS NAUERT: Well, it will continue to operate as an independent mission with an unchanged

mandate.

So it will continue all of the same functions.

QUESTION: My last question on the embassy: It – is – the State Department is apparently

– that lawyers of the State Department are looking into the legality of Mr. Sheldon Adelson,

a private citizen, paying for the embassy.

Could you confirm that or could you update us on this issue?

MS NAUERT: I --

QUESTION: Is it allowed that a private citizen can pay for an embassy?

MS NAUERT: I can just say that it's premature to discuss financing arrangements.

We have not had any formal discussions or any formal proposals of the sort, and when

it comes to overall cost estimates, that's something that we'll have to work out with

Congress.

QUESTION: But it has never happened in U.S. history that a private citizen has paid for

a diplomatic mission.

MS NAUERT: Not that I am aware of, but perhaps, perhaps very long ago, the first missions

were perhaps paid by Americans.

QUESTION: And I promise, my last question.

MS NAUERT: Okay.

QUESTION: Several months back, the Israelis arrested a 16-year-old girl.

Couple days ago, or last night, they arrested another 10 members of her family, including

a 15-year-old and so on.

You have any comment on that?

MS NAUERT: I think, as it pertains to that --

QUESTION: The Tamimi family.

MS NAUERT: -- it would be – yes, the Tamimi family – it would be a – an internal matter

for the Israelis and Palestinians.

You well know our position, and that is we believe all individuals, especially children,

should be treated humanely and their human rights respected and upheld.

Okay.

QUESTION: So would you call on them to release --

QUESTION: Same issue.

Same issue.

QUESTION: That was not an internal matter.

QUESTION: The facility in the Arnona neighborhood where the U.S. plans to open the embassy in

May – does the U.S. consider that piece of land to be in East Jerusalem or in West

Jerusalem?

MS NAUERT: The new facility we – the Arnona site you're referring to is located partly

in West Jerusalem and what's called the no man's land.

If some of you have been there – Said, I'm sure you've certainly seen it before – it's

a zone that was formerly demilitarized between 1949 and 1967, and it lies actually between

the 1949 armistice lines.

So it's partly in West Jerusalem and partly in what's considered no man's land.

QUESTION: Same issue, please.

QUESTION: Will you compensate the Palestinian family that owned that land?

MS NAUERT: Pardon me?

QUESTION: Will you compensate the Palestinian family that owned that land before?

MS NAUERT: Said, I don't have any information on that, okay?

That's news to me.

Hi.

QUESTION: Hi.

You know that May 14th is not independence day this year in Israel.

The Hebrew calendar is different every year and it's actually on April 18th.

Was that taken into consideration?

You didn't want to actually coincide with the holiday?

MS NAUERT: I'm --

QUESTION: Or you weren't aware --

MS NAUERT: I'm sorry, I don't – I'm not aware of the actual holiday scheduled

calendar.

My understanding is that it's to coincide with Israel's 70th anniversary.

QUESTION: But it's not.

That's the point.

So --

MS NAUERT: Okay.

Well, I will see if there's some sort of change on that for you.

QUESTION: Would you look into – (Laughter.)

MS NAUERT: Thank you.

QUESTION: Thank you.

MS NAUERT: Thank you.

Okay, let's move on.

QUESTION: (Off-mike.)

MS NAUERT: Nazira, hi.

QUESTION: Well, it's 70 years.

The --

QUESTION: Hi, Heather.

Thank you very much.

You mention about Kabul conference.

MS NAUERT: I'll check our calendar.

Go ahead, Nazira.

QUESTION: I forget my question.

(Laughter.)

MS NAUERT: Yes.

You can – you get your question.

QUESTION: It's okay.

No, no, no, Kabul – Kabul conference, what's your expectation?

MS NAUERT: She comes all the way from Afghanistan, Dave.

By the way, welcome back.

Nazira, go right ahead, Kabul conference.

QUESTION: Yeah, how is the conference?

What's your expectation?

And also Tashkent conference coming soon too.

MS NAUERT: Right.

So a couple things going on, and a lot going on in the region from where you're from.

And we're pretty enthusiastic about it, at least in terms of our participation and

our long-term hopes for Afghanistan, despite the horrific attacks that we have seen taking

place.

And I am constantly reminded by the resilience of the Afghan people.

Remember last year, there was a Kabul conference and they held that Kabul conference immediately

after, or not long after, there were some horrific attacks as well.

So the fact that the Afghans are willing to go forward with that is impressive and a testament

to their bravery.

The Kabul Process Conference in general, it takes place tomorrow, it begins tomorrow.

It's an Afghan-led, Afghan-owned initiative to try to bring together different international

partners to coordinate international efforts to support Afghanistan's pursuit of peace.

The Afghan Government – the United States is participating in this as well, as well

as international – other international countries.

We anticipate they will have candid conversations about peace, about security, about overall

connectivity, building and those types of things regarding Afghanistan, but also the

broader region.

The fact that the meeting is happening is something that is really impressive, and we

look forward to being a part of that meeting.

In terms of – you were asking about Tashkent in Uzbekistan.

There is a conference that is being held there.

It's being led by the Government of Uzbekistan.

The Government of Afghanistan will take part.

Uzbekistan has really what's considered a historic role.

Our Acting Assistant Secretary Alice Wells, who is participating in some of these overall

broader discussions, has spoken about this.

And she's really pointed out that she sees a new – a new Tashkent, and how helpful

they have been to the overall process and growing prosperity in Afghanistan.

Among the things she said about this: "It's a real opportunity for the region to embrace

what we think is going to come out of the Kabul process – an Afghan call for peace,

for reconciliation and affirmation.

That is the answer to Afghanistan."

And so to be able to gather in Tashkent and to have the regional powers and important

global powers there to be able to take that proclamation and endorse it, and look at how

the region can support this, is very important.

We consider Uzbekistan as having a historic role in supporting stability in Afghanistan,

and that conference is considered a real return to the international stage in a lot of ways.

So we look forward to that.

Okay.

QUESTION: Thank you very much

MS NAUERT: Anything else on Afghanistan?

QUESTION: Yes, please.

MS NAUERT: Okay, go right ahead.

QUESTION: Thank you, thank you so much.

Jahanzaib Ali from ARY News TV.

A few weeks ago, President Trump said that no more talks to the Taliban, but Taliban

release a letter asking American people to press their government to withdraw from Afghanistan.

Taliban also offered to participate in the peace talks.

So what is the future of peace talks, and will U.S. be a part of any dialogue with the

Taliban?

MS NAUERT: Would you mind backing up and restating part of that question?

I didn't catch the top part of it.

QUESTION: Taliban released a letter.

MS NAUERT: Oh, a letter.

Yes, yes, yes.

QUESTION: Yes, yes, in which they said that they can be a part of the dialogue process.

So will U.S. be a part of that dialogue process if it happens in near future?

MS NAUERT: So we certainly saw this letter and are aware of this letter.

Any peace talks with Afghanistan have to be Afghan-led and Afghan-owned.

That has long been our policy.

The Taliban, unfortunately, does not seem ready at this point to sit down and have conversations

about peace talks.

We hope eventually they will, because that is the best way to be able to have peace in

Afghanistan.

Ultimately, we don't see there being a military solution to the situation in Afghanistan.

Ultimately, it has to be a political situation, a political solution.

And that can best be done, if the Taliban is willing to sit down and have talks – certainly

the United States Government could have a role in that.

But that is up to – that's really up to Afghanistan, but it has to be Afghan-led and

Afghan-owned.

QUESTION: The Secretary General of United Nations Mr. Antonio expressed his concern

on the tensions between Pakistan and India, and he offered a role of mediator between

the two countries.

MS NAUERT: I --

QUESTION: I'm just saying – I'm just asking what role U.S. can play to ease down

the tensions there, because lot of fighting incidents and a lot of civilians and security

officials lost their lives during the last few days.

MS NAUERT: Understood.

We think that both sides would certainly have to sit down and have talks about that.

And – okay?

Okay.

Hi.

QUESTION: Senator --

MS NAUERT: Dave, hi.

QUESTION: Yes, thanks.

Senator Markey wrote a letter yesterday to Secretary Tillerson about – saying that

the Trump administration is pursuing a deal to sell nuclear reactors to the Kingdom of

Saudi Arabia.

He has a long list of detailed questions; I won't repeat all 12 of them.

But the topline question, I suppose, is: Are you negotiating with Saudi Arabia to sell

them nuclear reactors?

And if so, would you conclude a so-called 123 Agreement in order to insist Saudi Arabia

forego uranium enrichment and spent fuel reprocessing, which apparently is a thing that we've insisted

upon in the past?

MS NAUERT: I have not seen Senator Markey's letter to the State Department, so I cannot

confirm that we've – okay, I haven't seen it.

I haven't had time to review it.

(Laughter.)

I can take it back, and I can sit down and spend some time reviewing it if you like.

QUESTION: Yeah.

Yes, please.

MS NAUERT: If – okay.

QUESTION: I'll leave this with you.

MS NAUERT: Okay.

I'll just leave, then.

QUESTION: All right.

This – it's also addressed to Secretary Perry in Energy.

MS NAUERT: Okay.

We'll take a look at this and we'll see what you can back with you on.

It's certainly an issue that we've been tracking.

We know that Saudi Arabia has expressed an interest in possible U.S. supply of nuclear

equipment and material, but I'd have to take a look at this and get our experts to

chat with you about that a little bit more.

QUESTION: Heather --

QUESTION: You wouldn't be opposed to Saudi Arabia utilizing nuclear power, do you?

In principle --

MS NAUERT: Look, let me get with our experts, and I will get back to you all on that, okay?

QUESTION: Aside from – the letter aside --

MS NAUERT: Yes.

QUESTION: -- are you sympathetic to Saudi Arabia's concerns that in a civilian nuclear

agreement they should not be held to a more stringent standard – in other words, no

reprocessing, no enrichment – than we are currently holding Iran to under the JCPOA?

MS NAUERT: I'm going to have to check with our experts on that, okay?

Apparently you all are better scientists than I am today, so I congratulate you on that

one.

But I'll get back with you on that, okay?

All right.

Let's move on to something else.

QUESTION: To Russia?

QUESTION: On Egypt?

QUESTION: To Russia?

MS NAUERT: Kylie, go right ahead.

QUESTION: I just had a follow-up.

Are State Department officials headed to the meetings in London on Friday on this topic?

MS NAUERT: I'm not aware if our people are involved with that or not.

We will certainly look at it and see what we get for you, okay?

QUESTION: Okay, cool.

Thank you.

MS NAUERT: Conor, go ahead.

QUESTION: On Egypt.

QUESTION: On Russia.

Today before the Senate, the chief of U.S. Cyber Command, Admiral Rogers, told the Senate

that after interfering in the 2016 election, Russia still had not paid a price sufficient

to change their behavior in terms of interfering again in United States elections.

Tillerson had previously said that he wanted to move forward in the relationship.

So does he share the admiral's views?

MS NAUERT: Does he share the admiral's views about Russia meddling in the election and

concerns?

QUESTION: No, no, no, about not paying enough of a price.

MS NAUERT: Look, I think we have laid out – and I've covered this many times before,

so I don't want to spend our time going over this again and again – but the Secretary

has expressed our grave concerns with what Russia did with regard to our election.

The Secretary has also alerted the world and has had numerous conversations with his counterparts

not only in Europe, in the Western Hemisphere as well, where see attempts – Russia attempting

to meddle in other elections.

It is not unique to the United States.

We remain concerned about this.

Russia is certainly formidable in this.

There are other countries that do the same types of activities; North Korea is one of

them.

We continue, as the government, as a whole-of-government approach, to take a look at different ways

of hardening our overall electoral process.

Some of that is being handled by the Department of Homeland Security.

There are some efforts on the part of the State Department, although what we do here

tends to be outward looking to other countries, not inward here in the United States, because

we do diplomacy with other countries.

But there are a lot of activities in place.

We have talked many times, and I can go over the exhausted list – exhaustive list of

sanctions and other things that the State Department, Treasury, and others have been

imposing on Russia as a result of its activities.

Just because Russia is called out or penalized for its activities does not mean that Russia

is necessarily going to stop, and I say that in a broad fashion.

If we look at what Russia has done in Ukraine, if we look at Russia activities in Syria,

if we look at Russia activities in Georgia – I talked about part of what has happened

in South Ossetia and Abkhazia as well, years ago.

So we see that they're involved in other things.

The world has called them out for some of their activities.

Russia eventually is going to – if they want to be seen as a valued partner and a

responsible partner for the world, they're going to have to step up and refrain from

some of these activities.

QUESTION: But so in terms of moving the relationship forward, does the Secretary believe that Russia

has paid a sufficient price and therefore we could begin to move forward?

MS NAUERT: I'm not sure that we're there yet.

I'm not – I'm really not sure that we are.

It is – and the Secretary's been clear about this – we're at a low point in our

relationship with Russia.

There are other countries that share that with us, where we're at a low point; they

may be at a low point with other countries as well.

QUESTION: Want to name them?

MS NAUERT: No, I will decline to name it.

But he's been very clear about saying we are at a low point.

Are there some areas where, as two nuclear-powered countries, that we will have to work together?

Certainly there are.

And there are some areas, despite all of our differences, where we are still working together,

and I'll go back and I'll name that southwestern ceasefire in Syria, where the U.S., Jordan,

and Russia are working successfully to have a ceasefire.

That has been in effect since July of last year.

It would be nice if that could be used as a model in other parts of Syria.

That's what – one of the things that we're trying to push for.

Okay?

QUESTION: (Off-mike.)

QUESTION: A follow-up?

A follow-up?

MS NAUERT: Anything else related to Russia?

QUESTION: (Off-mike.)

QUESTION: Yes, Russia.

QUESTION: Yeah, yeah.

QUESTION: So today, the D.C.

City Council, working with U.S. lawmakers including Senator Rubio, held a ceremony with

Russian dissidents to rename a plaza in front of the Russian embassy on Wisconsin Avenue.

It's now on Boris Nemtsov Plaza in honor of the slain liberal politician.

Now, obviously, this was an initiative that an external group of people came up with,

but I noticed that Assistant Secretary of State Wess Mitchell was there.

Does the State Department support this decision and does it – do you think it would be helpful

in bringing pressure on the Russian mission and on the Russian administration more generally?

MS NAUERT: I can certainly tell you that this was a D.C.

Council decision.

I can confirm that Assistant Secretary Wess Mitchell was there.

I also want to reiterate what happened three years ago earlier this week – actually,

it was just yesterday – and that's when the opposition leader Boris Nemtsov was assassinated

just outside of the Kremlin.

I'd like to read for you a little from the statement that we put out, because it was

yesterday and I know we didn't brief yesterday: "[In honor of] the memory of Boris Nemtsov's

life and his work, we renew our call on the Government of Russia to uphold its obligations

to promote and protect universal human rights, including freedom of expression, peaceful

assembly, and freedom of association.

We…urge the Russian Government to ensure that all involved in [the] crime [of his death],

including those who organized it or ordered it, are brought to justice."

QUESTION: Now, the Russians are going to rename the street outside the U.S. embassy in Moscow.

Is that something that --

MS NAUERT: They're certainly --

QUESTION: -- you're at all worried about?

MS NAUERT: One fundamental freedom that we hold here, and very dear to us in the United

States, is the freedom of expression and freedom of the press.

If Russia should choose to rename the road in front of our embassy, that is certainly

their choice.

That is certainly their choice.

And I think that would, in fact, be a good example of our support of freedom of the press

and freedom of expression.

We hope that journalists will be able to cover various news events in Russia or things that

take place here in the United States, and that they could report as freely as all of

you can.

QUESTION: (Off-mike.)

QUESTION: Department issue – can I ask about a department issue --

QUESTION: China?

MS NAUERT: Okay.

Hold on.

QUESTION: -- a department-related – yes, the Radio – the Radio Sawa --

MS NAUERT: Let me – Said, let me get to some other people here, okay?

I'll come back to you after I call on some of our other journalists, okay?

Go right ahead.

QUESTION: Yes.

QUESTION: Thank you so much.

I understand the White House has some comments on this before.

I just want to know if State Department have anything to add --

MS NAUERT: To?

QUESTION: -- on China.

Do you have anything on Chinese proposal to abolish the presidential term limits?

MS NAUERT: Certainly.

So we've been following very closely what has happened in China and the response to

the China Communist Party seeking to abolish term limits there.

Strong institutions – and this is another fundamental freedom of the United States – we

believe that strong institutions are more important than individual leaders.

Promoting human rights and democratic governance is a core element of U.S. foreign policy.

It's an essential foundation of a stable, secure, and functioning society.

The United States remains unwavering in its commitment to advance personal liberty, human

dignity, and global prosperity globally, and that's all I have for you on that.

Okay?

Cuba.

QUESTION: I wanted to ask you about Radio Sawa, which is something that you sponsor

and finance.

Is it true that it is closing its services at the end of the month, I think – Radio

Sawa?

MS NAUERT: I'm not aware of that.

QUESTION: Are you aware of that?

MS NAUERT: I'm not aware of that, but I will --

QUESTION: Okay.

Well, it's an Arabic service radio that the State Department has sponsored since 2003.

MS NAUERT: I will take --

QUESTION: And in fact, we had a colleague come in here every day for a long time until

last year.

So what is the status on Radio Sawa?

MS NAUERT: I will take a look at that.

QUESTION: Thank you.

MS NAUERT: We will take that question and I'll get back with you on that.

Okay.

Cuba.

QUESTION: Thank you, Ms. Nauert.

The 4th of March is fast approaching and we wanted to know if the U.S. has decided to

replenish its diplomats in the embassy in Havana.

That's the first question.

And the second question would be that an agreement should be signed on the 8th or 9th of March

between Cuba and the United States regarding oil spills.

Have you any information on that as well?

MS NAUERT: In terms of our ordered departure status, which is the current status at our

embassy in Havana, we have to review that every 30 days, and the next time that that

is up is actually March the 4th, so that's coming up on us quickly.

In the reviews, the department weighs various factors as to what – in determining if we

wanted to open up our embassy to having more employees and more colleagues back in the

embassy.

We have to determine if conditions on the ground warrant lifting that departure status,

so we're still in conversations and discussions and deliberations about that.

We haven't made a decision just yet, but we'll let you know hopefully by March the

4th.

QUESTION: And regarding the agreement on oil spills between Havana and Washington, in case

there were an oil spill, given that there's exploration taking place – that should there

be an oil spill, the United States would also be affected.

Have you any information on that?

MS NAUERT: I think that's a hypothetical situation.

I don't have anything specific for you on that today.

QUESTION: Thank you.

MS NAUERT: Okay.

QUESTION: On Cuba, the Secretary's previous comment that the current status of the embassy

will remain in effect until Cuba can tell the United States that the attacks have stopped,

is that still an operative statement?

MS NAUERT: I believe it is.

I'd have to check with the Secretary on that.

You all know that he's out this week unfortunately, but that's something I'll just have to

check on, but we have until March the 4th to make our final decision about ordered departure.

Okay?

We've got to wrap it up, guys.

Thanks.

For more infomation >> Department Press Briefing - February 27, 2018 - Duration: 42:20.

-------------------------------------------

Brooklyn Woman Accused Of Poisoning Lookalike With Cheesecake, Stealing Her Identity - Duration: 0:33.

For more infomation >> Brooklyn Woman Accused Of Poisoning Lookalike With Cheesecake, Stealing Her Identity - Duration: 0:33.

-------------------------------------------

'She's Crowning, This Is Happening:' Quick-Thinking Husband Delivers Baby On The Side Of The LIE - Duration: 1:48.

For more infomation >> 'She's Crowning, This Is Happening:' Quick-Thinking Husband Delivers Baby On The Side Of The LIE - Duration: 1:48.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Lashes Out At AG Sessions - Duration: 0:54.

For more infomation >> Trump Lashes Out At AG Sessions - Duration: 0:54.

-------------------------------------------

Miami Schools Chief To Replace DOE Chancellor Fariña - Duration: 0:26.

For more infomation >> Miami Schools Chief To Replace DOE Chancellor Fariña - Duration: 0:26.

-------------------------------------------

David Bowie Exhibit Coming To Brooklyn Museum - Duration: 1:47.

For more infomation >> David Bowie Exhibit Coming To Brooklyn Museum - Duration: 1:47.

-------------------------------------------

Three dead in St. Lucie County - Duration: 1:35.

For more infomation >> Three dead in St. Lucie County - Duration: 1:35.

-------------------------------------------

City helping to build memorial garden for fallen law enforcement officers - Duration: 1:26.

For more infomation >> City helping to build memorial garden for fallen law enforcement officers - Duration: 1:26.

-------------------------------------------

Lili Estefan y Raúl de Molina lamentan la muerte de Rogelio Guerra | GyF - Duration: 1:33.

For more infomation >> Lili Estefan y Raúl de Molina lamentan la muerte de Rogelio Guerra | GyF - Duration: 1:33.

-------------------------------------------

Wednesday Marks International Rare Disease Day - Duration: 1:36.

For more infomation >> Wednesday Marks International Rare Disease Day - Duration: 1:36.

-------------------------------------------

Benefits of Basil to Health: Do You Know It? - Duration: 4:33.

For more infomation >> Benefits of Basil to Health: Do You Know It? - Duration: 4:33.

-------------------------------------------

Replay! Remember Me #02/23 Memorize - The Beginning (Part B) - Duration: 9:13.

"The only way to make sense out of change is to plunge into it, move with it, and join the dance."

- Alan Watts -

This place is so different from France, it's overwhelming.

Not just visually, but the intentions, the dreams, the attitude of the people to everything…

what a strange but wonderful place America is!

I have finally launched my company, Memorize, not just a job, but my own company.

Which seems to be the key, the first part of the riddle, but will this unlock my dream,

or will It end and I become a slave to somebody else's?

Here is the place I can start to find out who I am, what I am worth and the worth of my Sensen.

Browsing in the scruffy second hand bookshop in Chinatown, I picked up a book by philosopher

Alan Watts, opened it and read, "...the only way to make sense out of change is to

plunge into it, move with it, and join the dance."

Which is what I fully intend to do….and it finally started to feel real.

Researchers Replace Passwords With Mind-Reading Passthoughts

This is an incredible innovation; it is the beginning of man and machine merging.

The lines are already blurred; hopefully my Sensen can bring us even closer.

"Participants completed seven different mental tasks with the device, including imagining

their finger moving up and down and choosing a personalized secret.

Simple actions like focusing on breathing or on a thought for ten seconds resulted in

successful authentication."

"When you're gone, all that's left behind are the memories you created in other people's lives."

This is a quote from the movie "My Blueberry Nights" from 2007.

"You deliberately remember to forget" –Aldous Huxley –

"Brainpainting" system is proof-of-concept for interacting with our computers by thought alone.

"It could be a supplement to trackpads,

keyboards, touchpanels and other systems for interacting with computers.

G.tec already has software that can detect which items on a screen a user is paying attention to.

If you're used to working at a computer screen that's full of different windows,

imagine a system that brings whichever one of them you're looking at to the foreground…"

This is pretty basic stuff, little more than a gimmick.

If we want computers to interact with us properly then they need to understand our feelings

not just our habits.

Understanding comes from data, and computers big advantage is they can process as much

data as we can feed them.

In this sense they are insatiable, as are we to discover if we can join with them in

some future utopia.

We are nothing more than patterns and computers are nothing less than machines to analyze

and predict patterns.

A collision of some kind is inevitable…

"Memories establish the past; Senses perceive

the present; Imaginations shape the future."

- Toba Beta -

Molly shows me a whole other America, a bubbling

undercurrent, a web of connected resistance to the mainstream, crisscrossing the country,

east coast, west coast, Austen, Chicago, Detroit, and what is funny is that it exists in tandem

with startup culture, the very reason I'm here, the frontier of a new capitalism hand

in hand with the counterculture..Lectures, music, protest, books, all of this heading

somewhat recklessly in the same direction as Memorize!

Strange that Occupy Wall Street is part of the same culture that will make me and many

other grassroots capitalists very rich…

"The first memory will show the individual's fundamental view of life, his first satisfactory

crystallization of his attitude…

I would never investigate a personality without asking for the first memory."

-Alfred Adler-

Man in coma uses his thoughts to tell doctors, 'I'm not in pain'.

Back in 2010, neuroscientists confirmed that

it was possible to communicate with some patients locked in a vegetative state by using an fMRI

(Functional magnetic resonance imaging) scanner.

Though limited, the breakthrough suggested that more meaningful dialogue with patients

in a coma could someday be possible.

And now, two years later, it has finally happened.

A Canadian man in a vegetative state has used his thoughts to tell scientists that he is

not in any pain, marking the first time a patient in such a condition has relayed information

relevant to their care.

This proves that my funny looking headsets are more than just a gimmick; this is real

science that makes a real difference.

This will become ammo for me against the nay sayers.

I just hope one day we will all wake up from our collective coma of shortsightedness!

Molly has been great and introduced me to all her friends.

It's still a novel feeling, being a central piece of the social puzzle, but they all seem

happy to wear my silly looking headset and answer all my questions.

I knew nobody when I arrived here, and now I feel I fit in.

People understand what I'm about, because in some way it's what they want to do too.

To live without borders, to talk without walls…isn't this what we all want?

In many ways we are so different, but she totally understands my obsession with data

and data flow!

There would be no Sensen without her; I'd just be a clever guy without a clue.

Her sense of design will also help this clumsy headset look cool and more "with it."

It will be a device that can live in the world without being laughed at!

"The past scampers like an alley cat through the present, leaving the paw prints of memories

scattered helter-skelter" -Charles de Lint-

Samsung demos a tablet controlled by your brain

This is great because it's practical.

It truly empowers.

Imagine all the disabled people who will find a voice and catch up with us, all the fucked

up kids, all that potential unlocked, all adding to our collective endeavors!

Now I'm sounding like Molly, but this type of research is what makes me want to get out

of bed, although I fear the distance between humanity and computers is even greater.

The brain is and always has been the key!

For more infomation >> Replay! Remember Me #02/23 Memorize - The Beginning (Part B) - Duration: 9:13.

-------------------------------------------

Miércoles de la 2ª semana de Cuaresma – 28 de febrero de 2018 – Ciclo B - Duration: 32:00.

For more infomation >> Miércoles de la 2ª semana de Cuaresma – 28 de febrero de 2018 – Ciclo B - Duration: 32:00.

-------------------------------------------

土木3次元CAD WATs-3d 道路小段法面作成CIMシステム - Duration: 5:13.

For more infomation >> 土木3次元CAD WATs-3d 道路小段法面作成CIMシステム - Duration: 5:13.

-------------------------------------------

The most dangerous drone in world so for - Duration: 4:17.

The General Atomics MQ-9 Reaper (sometimes called Predator B) is an unmanned aerial vehicle

(UAV) capable of remotely controlled or autonomous flight operations, developed by General Atomics

Aeronautical Systems (GA-ASI) primarily for the United States Air Force (USAF).

The Reaper has a 950-shaft-horsepower (712 kW) turboprop engine.

The aircraft is monitored and controlled by aircrew in the Ground Control Station (GCS),

including weapons employment.

The Reaper is also used by the United States Navy, the CIA, U.S. Customs and Border Protection,

NASA, and the militaries of several other countries.

For more infomation >> The most dangerous drone in world so for - Duration: 4:17.

-------------------------------------------

🔴✅LE LLAMAN LA PLANTA DE LA JUVENTUD PORQUE SANA TODO LO DIFICIL GRACIAS A SUS BENEFICIOS - Duration: 5:56.

For more infomation >> 🔴✅LE LLAMAN LA PLANTA DE LA JUVENTUD PORQUE SANA TODO LO DIFICIL GRACIAS A SUS BENEFICIOS - Duration: 5:56.

-------------------------------------------

Nhạc Trẻ Hay Nhất 2018 - Nhạc Trẻ Remix Sôi Động Tâm Trạng Không Nên Nghe Khi Thất Tình - Duration: 49:48.

For more infomation >> Nhạc Trẻ Hay Nhất 2018 - Nhạc Trẻ Remix Sôi Động Tâm Trạng Không Nên Nghe Khi Thất Tình - Duration: 49:48.

-------------------------------------------

Nissan QASHQAI 1.2 Nieuw Model N-Connecta 360cam/Bleutooth/Navi/Panorama/Velgen - Duration: 1:00.

For more infomation >> Nissan QASHQAI 1.2 Nieuw Model N-Connecta 360cam/Bleutooth/Navi/Panorama/Velgen - Duration: 1:00.

-------------------------------------------

For more infomation >> Nissan QASHQAI 1.2 Nieuw Model N-Connecta 360cam/Bleutooth/Navi/Panorama/Velgen - Duration: 1:00.

-------------------------------------------

Rothen défend Thauvin, fantomatique lors des PSG-OM - Duration: 0:43.

For more infomation >> Rothen défend Thauvin, fantomatique lors des PSG-OM - Duration: 0:43.

-------------------------------------------

For more infomation >> Rothen défend Thauvin, fantomatique lors des PSG-OM - Duration: 0:43.

-------------------------------------------

STRESS et burnout - Extrait des 120 entretiens de Lucien Auger, Psychologue - Duration: 31:48.

For more infomation >> STRESS et burnout - Extrait des 120 entretiens de Lucien Auger, Psychologue - Duration: 31:48.

-------------------------------------------

For more infomation >> STRESS et burnout - Extrait des 120 entretiens de Lucien Auger, Psychologue - Duration: 31:48.

-------------------------------------------

Exploring Abandoned Museum of the Finger of God - URBEX - Abandoned places - Duration: 5:59.

November 28, 2018

THE FINGER OF GOD FALLS

THE FINGER OF GOD FALLS

THE FINGER OF GOD FALLS

GOOD MORNING

Today in the middle of this storm that lashes the Canary Islands

we move to the Gran Canario village of Agaete

On November 28, 2005 for the first time in 200 years a tropical storm crosses the Atlantic

and hits the Canary Islands with winds of up to 245 km per hour.

The fall of the upper part of the finger of God is among the extensive destruction that the storm made.

A rock that was a symbol of the island of Gran Canaria

At that time, a museum was built completely deodorized to the finger of God

however after the fall of the upper part of the finger of God

the museum is abandoned, being destroyed and place where vagabonds live

as always we ask you to subscribe to the channel to not miss the next videos and that you support us in Patreon if you are possible (link in the description box) to continue making videos.

we see that it was a symbol of Gran Canaria

this is the part that fell during the storm

this is the view from the road of the Village

no Trespassing. danger of landslides.

Hello

Hello

This is what the museum was going to be.

It is full of garbage.

He must have spent a lot of money here. These are the bathrooms

You can tell that someone has lived here

Someone took the place to live.

Step from being a museum to a place to live some vagabond.

Once the finger of God fell, the place was abandoned.

Look at the windows you had, the wooden doors.

This should be a place where you want to put pictures or photographs. Up there are some rails.

noises are heard because there is a storm of wind today

this should go on the floor.

Everything is full of garbage. It is a pity. Everything has been destroyed and abandoned.

Do you see how big it was?

I do not know if it looks good.

This is what remains of a museum that is now unviable.

It is appreciated how big it is.

we come a little closer

to see the dimensions of the site, you see that it is very high

I think it was real size to the original.

from here we say goodbye

If you liked the video give us like, subscribe, share, support us in Patreon if you can (link in the description box) and we'll wait for you in the next video. Thank you very much. A greeting.

For more infomation >> Exploring Abandoned Museum of the Finger of God - URBEX - Abandoned places - Duration: 5:59.

-------------------------------------------

For more infomation >> Exploring Abandoned Museum of the Finger of God - URBEX - Abandoned places - Duration: 5:59.

-------------------------------------------

ANATOMY of a MURDER - WikiVidi Documentary - Duration: 16:48.

For more infomation >> ANATOMY of a MURDER - WikiVidi Documentary - Duration: 16:48.

-------------------------------------------

For more infomation >> ANATOMY of a MURDER - WikiVidi Documentary - Duration: 16:48.

-------------------------------------------

H.E.R. Type Beat

For more infomation >> H.E.R. Type Beat

-------------------------------------------

「I'm超野」〜黒のカリスマ家族の襲撃篇〜|蝶野正洋 - Duration: 0:31.

For more infomation >> 「I'm超野」〜黒のカリスマ家族の襲撃篇〜|蝶野正洋 - Duration: 0:31.

-------------------------------------------

「I'm超野」〜超野家の食卓激震篇〜|蝶野正洋 - Duration: 0:34.

For more infomation >> 「I'm超野」〜超野家の食卓激震篇〜|蝶野正洋 - Duration: 0:34.

-------------------------------------------

Piękne mieszkanie Wrocław RYNEK Plac Solny 73 m 3 pokoje - Duration: 2:00.

For more infomation >> Piękne mieszkanie Wrocław RYNEK Plac Solny 73 m 3 pokoje - Duration: 2:00.

-------------------------------------------

Hack My Life: Inside Hacks - Hack Mail: Butter Fingers | truTV - Duration: 3:07.

[ Whispering ] What'd I miss?

Is Leo dead?

[ Sighs ]

You know, maybe if you'd

watch the movie

instead of paying attention

to your popcorn,

you'd know what was going on.

I don't want to get butter all over my hands. It's gross.

Listen, butterball, it's your lucky day

'cause we've got some hacks

to keep those fingers nice and clean

in today's Hack Mail.

All right, friends. Here's how this Hack Mail is going down.

Brooke and I are gonna attempt to eat our way

through these greasy buckets of popcorn

without making a mess

of our hands.

The hack that keeps

our fingers the cleanest

while delivering the most corn into our holes gets our...

Both: Hack Seal of Approval!

And the nominees are...

Chopsticks. In popcorn.

Yeah! Get it going!

Yeah, that feels comfortable.

You're not getting that butter all over your hands.

You can keep constant contact with that movie screen.

Clean hands.

Also, portion control.

I'm eating at a decent pace.

It's quiet.

I'm not disturbing anybody. I think it's a good hack.

Hack #2 comes

from Todd in Bath, Ohio.

He says...

Okay, Todd. Game on.

Yeah, I think mouth outside the tube is the way...

No. [ Laughs ]

I think that's the only way it's going down, Brooke.

I know

we're trying to avoid it,

but I feel like

that's what's happening here.

Remember,

the Internet's forever.

I want each breath to be my last.

Oh!

[ Coughs ]

God.

Okay.

Yep.

No one should do this.

Stay away from this.

Our last hack comes from Miguel in Charlotte, North Carolina.

Miguel knows us so well.

Here we go.

Okay, that easily holds a large.

Oh, looks like pelican's maw.

My chest is nice and warm.

I'm hands-free.

If I want it a little closer to my head...

I appreciate your commitment,

but for me,

I think just put the bucket or the bag right on in.

Now, would you actually do this in real life?

God, no!

This is a prank, basically. -Yeah.

So there's one every time

we do this segment.

Might have been

two this time, Brooke.

Now, our first hack, we laughed at.

Laughed at.

Chopsticks!

Judged it right out of the gate.

We owe you a big apology.

The chopsticks were very portable.

You're not choking

and you're ruining a hoodie

and getting popcorn everywhere.

Val, you win our...

Both: Hack Seal of Approval.

If you folks at home have hacks that you want us to try on the show,

it's oh-so-simple.

Just got to truTV.com/hacks

and send them in.

And, hey!

You might break Brooke!

[ Chuckles ]

I'm Brooke.

For more infomation >> Hack My Life: Inside Hacks - Hack Mail: Butter Fingers | truTV - Duration: 3:07.

-------------------------------------------

Impractical Jokers - Jokers Cruise 2 (Web Chat) | truTV - Duration: 4:00.

♪♪

Announcer: Ladies and gentlemen, the Impractical Jokers.

[ Cheers and applause ]

Joe, Murr, Q, Sal.

We'll get questions from you guys right now.

Hi, I'm Rachael. I'm from Houston, Texas.

Hi, Rachael.

♪ The stars at night ♪

♪ Are big and bright ♪

♪ Deep in the heart of Texas ♪

Everyone talks about an Impractical Jokers movie

being made, so if it was made,

which actors would each of you choose to portray you and why?

John Cryer. John Cryer's a spitting image.

Kane Hodder.

I'm gonna say either Jennifer Aniston or Lorenzo Lamas.

Yeah, Steve Carell, probably.

What was the movie about?

Wow. Steve Carell, John Cryer, Kane Hodder, and Lorenzo Lamas.

What did you say?

Lorenzo Lamas?

Alonzo Lamas?

Lorenzo Lamas?

Lorenzo the Llama?

They're all going, "They'd be best friends in high school."

When she says her name, everyone say, "Hi..." and then her name.

Robin from Hamilton, New Jersey.

All: Hi, Robin!

You guys do some truly terrible things to one another.

Have any of you ever gotten really mad

about one of the punishments?

The energy you're throwing at me is insane right now.

Are we watching you die?!

Someone had

a piña colada or three.

The last thing I heard

was "Robin."

If I cut you in your arm, frozen margarita would spill out.

I think you're going down a roller coaster

very far away from us.

You know what was a really bad punishment was this guy.

[ Cheers and applause ]

-Oh, no! -Do not do it. Do not do it.

Sal: That's not

your traditional handcuff.

That's more like

an "S" and "M" handcuff.

How would you know.

Yeah, by the way,

I'm gonna need those back.

This was rough.

This was 24 legit hours of this.

He didn't talk, right?

Pierre decides not to talk.

He goes full mime.

And when he said, after 24 hours, "Nice working with you,"

we all lost our [bleep]

Awesome working with you, man.

[ Laughter ]

Now he talks. Now he talks.

Murr: Next question, please.

My name's Eve from Perth, Australia.

[ Cheers and applause ]

Are you reading your name

off that paper?

I know my name.

Okay, my question is --

Seriously, guys, no bull[bleep]

[ Laughter ]

If God were to come down now and say to each of you,

"Ask me one question, and I will answer it,"

what would the question be?

I would say

what's the deal with Tory?

Don't bull[bleep] Tory over there.

That's it! In the next two days,

you don't give her no bull[bleep]

Okay, Sal, you're up.

Oh, [bleep]

I'm nervous now.

Yes you are. Come on.

Are you God? Hold on. Are you God?

Is there anything after this life?

The fact that God shows up,

that kind of proves

that all that stuff is real.

You're wasting your question.

You don't know that there's something for us.

Yeah, but whether you know

or don't know the answer

to that question,

it doesn't make any sense.

See?! Are you happy?!

If there's nothing after this life,

I'm gonna go on, like, a five-year bender.

You're four years in on a bender!

Joe is very bright.

Oh, you want my question?

God, can I have my dead mother back.

All: Aww!

"No."

Thank you all so much, again. It's only halfway through.

We hope you're having a good time.

This is

really special for us.

You guys are really cool.

I hope you're having as good a time as I am. Thank you.

This good lighting, everybody.

It's magic hour. Take your selfies.

For more infomation >> Impractical Jokers - Jokers Cruise 2 (Web Chat) | truTV - Duration: 4:00.

-------------------------------------------

How the States Got Their Shapes - Duration: 4:20.

When I was in eighth grade, I was very curious about how the states got their shapes.

Why are all the states so weirdly shaped

and then Wyoming and Colorado are just boxes?

Why are the states in the east real tiny, but the states in the west so huge?

I voiced this curiosity to my social studies teacher that year,

and she introduced me to the show, "How the States Got Their Shapes."

I loved this show.

I still tell people how some states got their shapes much to the annoyance of most of them.

If you're one of those people that would be annoyed by that, click away, go watch TheOdd1sOut or something

beacause I'm about to learn you a lesson on why the states are so weird.

Number one:

Why are the eastern states's borders squiggly lines, but the western states's borders straight and boxy?

Well it's because of choo-choo trains.

Back in the east they used rivers as borders because trains hadn't been invented yet,

and water was their primary source of transportations.

(That's also why most major cities are on water)

That's also why most state borders in the east are very squiggly.

Then comes the Industrial Revolution,

TRAINS ARE HERE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Also, the U.S. is moving west and with that movement comes more states,

and when you have more states you have more borders, so what do you do to define these borders?

With the train tracks! That's why most state borders have straight lines and are so boxy.

Number two: Missouri.

Missouri seems like a pretty normally shaped state,

with the straight border on the bottom, top, and left side,

and the Mississippi River carving out the western side.

Everything's normal except for those two weird things on the side.

The little bit on the top left is the Platte Purchase which was acquired *FROM* the Natives there.

I don't get why it's called the Platte Purchase,

when I doubt there was any actual purchasing going on.

The bootheel of Missouri is actually an interesting story,

At least... it is to me.

Back when Missouri was first admitted to the Union, it didn't include the bootheel.

The people that lived there were all like,

"we have more in commom with Missouri,"

"Missouri is better than Arkansas,"

"Arkansas is bad," etc.

No,

after writing this I looked it up just to confirm if I was remembering it right,

and it turns out was I said was just a legend.

It turns out it was because the rich landowners didn't want to be part of Arkansas

and just wanted to govern themselves.

But that's boring.

Another version I heard from the aforementioned (ooh big word) social studies teacher was that

there was a huge earthquake in New Madrid, Missouri.

It rang bells in North Carolina,

made the Mississippi River run backwards,

and destroyed Memphis.

This earthquake devastated the area in what is now south-eastern Missouri,

which meant it was cheap to buy.

This guy bought the land,

and when Arkansas and Missouri were becoming states

he wanted to join Missouri because he felt that Missouri would have stronger political power.

I didn't see the version anywhere on Wikipedia, so I'm assuming it's not true.

That kinda makes me sad because it was pretty interesting.

I guess teachers can't always be right.

Next, Ohio and Michigan.

Have you ever wondered why Michigan has that upper peninsula?

No?

Well, too bad, I warned you I was going to nerd out.

Well,

back in the day Toledo was a pretty important city,

with it being on Lake Erie and all.

Michigan and Ohio both wanted Toledo,

and they actually had a war called the

Toledo War. Or the Michigan-Ohio War.

It depends on who you ask.

It lasted from 1835 to 1836

The U.S. government was all like,

"we can't have these states fighting, that's no good."

(Even though the Civil War would be like 30 years later)

So they proposed a deal.

Ohio would get Toledo,

and Michigan would get the land above Lake Michigan that no one had really explored or colonized yet.

Michigan was pretty sad at the time,

but I imagine they're just laughing now.

Finally, why is a part of Kentucky not actually in Kentucky?

Funny you should ask,

it's because that part of Kentucky actually used to be connected to Kentucky.

How did it end up looking like it either belongs to Missouri or Tennessee?

Interesting story, it's because of the Mississippi River.

Rivers, especailly rivers like the Mississippi or Missouri,

are constantly changing their position due to erosion and stuff.

The river eventually moved downward enough

that it separated that part of Fulton County from the rest of Fulton County.

I went onto Google Streetview to see if there were any houses or people living in the area

and all I saw was a bunch of farmland, which isn't really too weird for the U.S.

Quick note before I go to the end card,

while I was messing around with Google Maps

I found that someone had gone kayaking (or canoeing or whatever)

and took a 360 camera so you can do a streetview of that part of the Mississippi River

that surrounds that little part of Fulton County

Radical.

Alright, that's it,

I hope you enjoyed the video

and that I didn't nerd out too much.

This was really a fun video to make because it's just so interesting to me,

but yeah okay bye.

For more infomation >> How the States Got Their Shapes - Duration: 4:20.

-------------------------------------------

DECK GIVEAWAY!!! - Duration: 1:26.

whats going on everyone and im doing a giveaway right here its a small giveaway its just a

deck of cards the is the bicycle dragon back deck of cards right here as you can see its

a little shiny because its still in the plastic rapping but if you want I can take it out

of the rapping and I can sing it i can keep it sealed just in case you want to keep it

sealed just so you can say wow I got this from a you tuber Sutton the magician the magician

who doesn't have a stage name yet but coming up with one but anyways your asking yourself

how do I win this I mean like its super easy all you half to do is go to Instagram look

up my name Sutton The Magician or click the link in the description to go to my Instagram

page or you know just search it on Instagram over a half billion people use the app actually

more than that now but all you half to do it go to the photo of this deck of cards and

just like the photo and comment #SuttonRocks and you know maybe tell me what you guys think

about my channel but its all im asking is if you guys can say #SuttonRocks and ill be

announcing the winner of this deck giveaway in about a week a week in a half two weeks

probably about a week in a half but anyways thats all im asking you guys to do to win

this and I will send it to right to where ever you wont me to send it anyways thank

you guys so much for watching go do that follow me on Instagram go comment on the photo anyways

hope you guys enjoyed this like I just said anyways you know what to do and well see you

next time

For more infomation >> DECK GIVEAWAY!!! - Duration: 1:26.

-------------------------------------------

A winter's ball (ANIMATIC)Eddsworld - Duration: 1:20.

For more infomation >> A winter's ball (ANIMATIC)Eddsworld - Duration: 1:20.

-------------------------------------------

grwm - Q&A about wearing MAKEUP, BULLYING, + more (Japanese CC subtitles) | VERTICAL Portrait VIDEO - Duration: 20:23.

For more infomation >> grwm - Q&A about wearing MAKEUP, BULLYING, + more (Japanese CC subtitles) | VERTICAL Portrait VIDEO - Duration: 20:23.

-------------------------------------------

JBJ INTRO - Edition Simulator - Duration: 4:58.

For more infomation >> JBJ INTRO - Edition Simulator - Duration: 4:58.

-------------------------------------------

NAZCA LINES - WikiVidi Documentary - Duration: 14:18.

For more infomation >> NAZCA LINES - WikiVidi Documentary - Duration: 14:18.

-------------------------------------------

President Updates -- February 2018 - Duration: 2:35.

Hi, I'm Melissa.

Today's video will cover two points: self-advocacy and Deaf Grassroots Movement (DGM).

First, there have been several conversations about when to start encouraging young people to

become self-advocates?

It starts at any age, from young to old.

Self-advocacy begins with yourself and determining if you feel you need to do something to make things right.

It could be about communication, understanding something, or just about anything in life.

Even young children can self-advocate themselves!

An example would be students asking a teacher where their eyeglasses are.

Another example would be students asking the teacher to clarify the classroom lesson that was just discussed.

Students who are pre-teens can also self-advocate!

An example of self-advocacy by a mainstreamed pre-teen could involve asking for interpreters for

an after-school program or at a football practice.

Where do young students learn this?

Their role models are adults.

To help students understand, adults can show what self-advocacy looks like, talk about it,

and engage with the students in a positive way.

From there, youth will internalize self-advocacy tools and feel good about themselves.

Another idea for self-advocacy training is to bring youth to voter registration,

to meet your Senators and legislators, or to any deaf event.

It doesn't matter whether they're deaf or hearing, youth need self-advocacy role models.

As they grow up, they can incorporate what they learned and be able to articulate their rights as a deaf person

or support deaf people if they are a hearing ally.

That is something for all of us to consider in preparing our youth for self-advocacy.

My second point is about DGM.

DGM is currently planning a phenomenal two-day event.

On March 7, all afternoon, for some DGM leaders, there will be legislative training in DC.

On March 8, everyone is invited to an all day rally and march in DC.

DGM focuses on advocating for improved C-E-J: communication, education, and jobs.

The march will start in front of Gallaudet University and end at the U.S. Capitol.

At the end of the march, there will be a rally program.

You can look at DGM's website and Facebook page for more information.

If you have an opportunity to join us -- even if for an hour or two, please do!

This rally and march is for everyone in the deaf community.

Legislators must know we are here and that our C-E-J issues are still important.

Our issues must be resolved.

So, join us!

Thank you.

For more infomation >> President Updates -- February 2018 - Duration: 2:35.

-------------------------------------------

Zacarías M. de la Riva: talent, hard work and luck - Duration: 5:36.

Music is one of the elements to be added to a short film or a movie.

It is an element that has to be in function of what happens in the film. In this case,

In this case, in Tadeo's short film [Tadeo Jones] and with Tadeo's films I am at

the service of the film and at the service of the director (s).

I have a hard time getting something I'm comfortable with.

The problem is that you have short time when you have to deliver the music and of course

you can't wait... I like to make a music, leave it there, let it breathe.

I can't do this!

But I can't make it when I'm doing music for films because I have some time to deliver the music,

I have to finish it and the director and the producer are waiting.

I usually do more or less the same thing every time. I watch the film and with the director's comments

what I do is make a musical motifs on piano and with those musical motifs

then I apply them to the music that I am going to make in the soundtrack, but I always

play before on the piano and I take out those ideas, those cells, those motifs and then use them

in the film. And sometimes the leitmotiv is a melodic thing, but sometimes it's a sound alone or it's a chord...

or it's... it depends a little bit on the movie, whatever it calls you.

Sometimes what I also like to do is to go running and play music and do something else

that doesn't make me think about the music I have to solve, and in that way, many

times I feel that ideas come up to me.

I am more into the music of John Williams or how those music sounds... I see myself more...

I don't know how to make it, but I see myself more reflected in that music because I... it would be impossible for me

it would be impossible for me to make that kind of music but it's the music that I listen to and that fills me and

that fills me and I love to listen to, right? Hans

Zimmer also: there are things that I love about Hans Zimmer, so a little is more the result and not how you get it.

With Autómata I feel a bond that I don't feel with many of my other soundtracks.

This is the second film I've made with the director, which is Gabe Ibáñez, with whom

I made Hierro, this is the second time I've worked with him... I know him a bit but Autómata,

it was for me a gift to be able to work in Autómata and explore

a different and risky musical universe; We had our problems with the American producer because we did

did things that the Americans would perhaps not do. We took, did, recorded

a choir and the choral music linked it to the robots. And that was a bit like: "How?

You are assigning a human voice to a robot?"

And Gabe and I loved it, we thought it was a thing that worked very well

despite the contrast. And in the end we got that, we push that idea forward, and for that type

of ideas Autómata is one of my favorite soundtracks.

But terror… I've made a few horror movies and I have a great time making horror movies

because you can explore different sonorities because terror can be achieved in many ways.

Supporting the terror with music and that exploration, those dissonances...

what do you want to do with music you can do in many ways, right? Animation

is a little bit of a way that is very limited, you have to go this way, you can't get out

much. The music of animation has to be here, instead the terror where you can do

many different things and that's cool, that's cool.

For more infomation >> Zacarías M. de la Riva: talent, hard work and luck - Duration: 5:36.

-------------------------------------------

Weird Lady *STALKS* Security Guard in Debenhams! #Creep - Duration: 11:02.

When something goes down in a department store,

there's always security to intervene - but who guards the guards?

As it turns out, that's when the police have to be called in.

This old woman here, named Lisa Bradley, regularly visit a department store - just to stare at

the security guard.

In January this year, the police were called in to forcefully remove her from the premises,

and it got so bad - the security guard had taken out a restraining order against the

woman.

Sometimes she even stood outside, just looking at the guy.

Thankfully, she's been banned from the store for 2 years and if she does trespass, she'll

most likely be arrested.

According to her lawyer, Lisa suffers from mental health issues, including paranoia - but

that still doesn't explain why she's obsessed with this

one guy.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét