TY: Welcome back to "The Truth About Vaccines," episode number 2.
Are you familiar with the ingredients in the CDC's recommended vaccine schedule today?
Did the polio vaccine eradicate polio?
These questions and many more will be answered in tonight's episode.
I hope you enjoy it.
The goal of "The Truth About Vaccines" is to present this information in as clear,
precise, accurate, yet unbiased method as is humanly possible, focusing on the science,
creating awareness, evaluating studies to determine whether or not vaccines are safe
and effective.
We also will be addressing the fundamental topic of freedom of choice.
So, let's get rolling with tonight's episode.
Many of the studies indicating that vaccines are safe are epidemiological studies.
Here's Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. explaining the concept of epidemiology.
ROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR.: Epidemiology is the study of populations and the impact, for example,
of an environmental condition or toxin on an entire population.
What epidemiologists try to do is they look at the population that was exposed to the
toxin and they examine their health outcomes and then they look at unexposed population
which is called the controls.
Epidemiology is notoriously susceptible to manipulation.
You could design an epidemiology study that proved that sex does not make you pregnant.
How would you do that?
You would eliminate all the pregnant people before you did the study so that you just
ended up studying people who were having a lot of sex but nobody was getting pregnant,
ergo sex doesn't make you pregnant.
That's what they did with these epidemiology studies that the CDC orchestrated.
They eliminated the populations that had autism before they did the study.
BRANDY VAUGHN: I used to work for Merck.
I sold Vioxx for them, 2001 to 2003, along with other drugs.
And I really saw from the inside how shady and unethical things are done, and how data
is kind of twisted around.
The manipulation, the training that you really get, how you can go in and influence doctors
to say things that aren't even true and convince them of it by building relationships and by
making sure that you're their only source of information.
I worked for Merck and I saw how things went down on the inside and I left because it was
just—ethically, I couldn't stand it.
But before I started working in pharma, I was just like everyone else.
I thought pharmaceutical drugs and vaccines were for the greater good, and then I saw
it from the inside how wrong that really is and how they twist all of the information.
ROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR.: There's a saying in my racket, which is environmental litigation,
which is that "Statistics don't lie but statisticians do."
And statisticians, with an epidemiology study in their hands, have a perfect opportunity
to manipulate data.
TY: Statistics don't lie, but statisticians do.
I asked Barbara Loe Fisher, the head of the National Vaccine Information Center, to elaborate
on clinical trials and vaccine testing.
BARBARA LOE FISHER: These clinical trials are very small, relatively small.
And they don't really—they're also cleansed, in that the participants in vaccine trials
often do not reflect the population that gets the vaccine after it's licensed.
They whitewash it.
How?
Well, children who are sick at the time of vaccination don't get vaccinated.
Lots of kids get vaccinated when they're sick in this country.
Children who have severe allergies, who have brain and immune system disorders, they aren't
in those trials, but a lot of kids like that get vaccines, all of them do.
In these clinical trials, they'll often use an active placebo instead of an inactive
placebo.
DR.
HUMPHRIES: That was really one of the real surprising elements to me when I started to
research because conventionally—I mean I worked in a lab, I know what a placebo should
be.
It should be an inert substance that has no physiological effect.
When it comes to vaccines, it's very rare to find the studies that are actually used
for the FDA approval to use a saline placebo.
Instead what will be used is either the background substance of a vaccine, which might have aluminum
in it, or Polysorbate-80, or some amino acids, or even more commonly, another vaccine that
has already been proven safe.
So, for instance, if you want to test this year's flu shot you will test it against last
year's flu shot for its safety rather than testing it against a saline placebo.
DR.
TENPENNY: What safe really means is that it shouldn't harm you at all, that it shouldn't
be any problem.
But in safety studies when it comes to vaccines, one thing for sure is they don't use a true
placebo as the control.
When you're looking at a new drug, say for high blood pressure, you're given a high
blood pressure medication and you're given something like a sugar pill.
Well, with vaccines, they bring a new vaccine to market.
They use either another vaccine with a known safety profile or they use a shot of a substance
that they consider to be inert.
TY: In the October 19, 2010 edition of The Annals of Internal Medicine, there was a study
published by researchers at the University of California.
They reviewed 167 placebo-controlled trials published in peer-reviewed medical journals
in 2008 and 2009 and found that 91.8 percent of the drug trials and 73.3 percent of the
injections, vaccines, never described the ingredients of their placebos.
So, if we don't know what's in a placebo, then how can we know if the study is valid?
In other words, if you give a sugar placebo to the control group in a diabetes study,
then it might skew the outcome, right?
In this next section, we'll hear from several experts about the vaccine creation process
and also some common vaccine ingredients.
Talk about the way that vaccines are cultured, the substrates.
I mean just go into the details about that because many people are unaware.
DR.
BELL: Yeah, they'll use chicken embryos, monkey kidney tissue, renal tissue, renal tissue
from dogs or animals like this, aborted fetal tissue.
They of course have to neutralize these things with toxic chemicals like formaldehyde, which
is embalming fluid, sometimes some other forms of antibiotics are utilized in the production,
heavy metals to create an adjuvant kind of thing, to aggravate the immune system so that
they can use smaller amounts of the antigen that would produce what they're calling their
Holy Grail, their antibody response.
But it's an absolute nightmare because they haven't analyzed how it impacts other body
systems in its entirety, much less multiple shots, multiple vaccines, all of the things
that are in concert for the entire schedule.
DR.
PALEVSKY: In 2005, the FDA put out a report about the contaminants of foreign DNA in vaccines.
They said in their presentation, "We do not know if any of the contaminants that we
know exist in vaccines from foreign DNA will lead to the development of any event."
They left it as an "event."
They didn't know what event that would lead to, whether a takeover of the DNA in the body,
cancer, cell death, inflammation, they had no idea.
In 2005, admitting that there are foreign DNA particles in vaccines, that are unavoidably
in there, they said "We don't know if any of these foreign DNA particles can lead
to an event."
DR.
ZIELINSKI: What's Triton-X 100?
Dow Chemical.
It's a Dow Chemical surfactant in your household cleaner, in your industrial cleaner, in your
paint.
It's in your pesticides, Ty.
It's a surfactant.
And that's in your flu shot.
And here's the thing.
I don't care this whole concept of parts per billion.
It doesn't make sense to me.
If it's a toxic chemical, it's a toxic chemical.
These chemicals, we know—formaldehyde was in that flu shot ingredient list that my buddy
shared with me.
We know formaldehyde, according to the National Institute of Health can cause cancer.
DR.
THOMAS: If you look at package inserts for pharmaceutical products, they're folded
up nice and small on very thin paper, and they're usually about this big, tiny print,
both sides, and hidden somewhere in that maze of tiny print that you can't quite read would
be the actual ingredients in the product, whether it's a vaccine or a medication you're
taking.
And somewhere in there is this long list of potential side effects, and as a physician,
every time you wrote a prescription, if you were to stop and go through all of that, well
you might as well close your doors.
There is not enough time in the day to do that level of informed consent.
MIKE ADAMS: Let's take two people.
One person, Person A, let's say.
Strong immune system can respond to an infection, can respond to the presence of a virus and
build their own antibodies, right?
Person A.
Let's say this person Z. Immuno-suppressed, living on junk food, vitamin D deficient.
Gets sick every winter.
Thinks they need a vaccine.
Now, person A (remember, strong response), do they need a vaccine against the flu?
The answer is no, because if they're exposed to the flu, they're going to immunize themselves,
right?
Because they have a strong response.
Person Z, if they get the vaccine, does it work?
The answer is no because they can't have a response to it.
The vaccine fails on the person who could theoretically benefit from it, and the vaccine
is not needed on the person who doesn't need it because they have their own immune
building system.
So, what do the vaccine companies do?
They add chemicals to the vaccine, thinking about person Z.
They say, "This vaccine doesn't have a strong enough response so we're going to
add these toxic, inflammatory chemicals," these adjuvants, as they're called.
Toxic, toxic.
Should never be injected into anybody.
They add those to cause an inflammatory response to try to get that person's body to respond
to that vaccine injection.
And that is where a lot of the hazard comes from.
That's where you get epilepsy.
You get seizures, you get people put into comas.
You get autism.
It's because of the toxic chemicals.
TY: Nobody questions whether vaccines contain toxic chemicals or not.
The real debate relates to whether or not the toxic chemicals are contained in large
enough quantities to actually injure the person.
DR.
SAHNI: Certainly, there is injury.
The Supreme Court has stated that there's injury.
There's been a lot of money that's been awarded in lawsuits; 3.6 billion.
And there are codes.
As a medical doctor we use diagnosis codes, the International Classification of Disease.
It's actually International Statistical Classification of Disease.
And we just transitioned from something called ICD-9 to ICD-10.
But, ICD-9 codes, there's 18 different codes that specifically define vaccine injury.
If someone wanted to Google them and look them up they would type in ICD-9 and look
at 9.78 and 9.79, and each of those ICD—those are ICD-9 codes—have sub-classifications,
9 each, discussing the different injuries that are created by vaccines.
So clearly, if there was no injury from vaccines, there would be no need to have an ICD-9 code.
I mean why would you create it?
Why would you put that in your coding system if there were no vaccine injuries?
The ICD classification system defines it, and says "Here we are.
Here are 18 different injuries that we're going to list for you to give your patient
as a diagnosis when they come in to see you."
TY: Dr. Sahni mentioned ICD-9 codes, specifically 9.78 and 9.79, each of which have 9 vaccines
that they cover, totaling 18 vaccines that have diagnostic codes.
You can see them on the screen right now.
Many vaccines contain formaldehyde and Triton-X 100, both of which are known to cause cancer.
Formaldehyde is rapidly broken down when we eat it, but it can remain in its whole form
when injected.
According to the American Cancer Society, the types of cancer common among children,
such as leukemia, are the types most closely associated with formaldehyde.
The CDC's position is that formaldehyde is contained in such small doses in vaccines
that it doesn't threaten human health.
However, there is a conspicuous lack of research into the effects of formaldehyde exposure
through multiple vaccines in pediatric populations.
Given that infants and small children possess a much greater sensitivity to toxins compared
to adults and that formaldehyde is introduced to children through vaccinations containing
a host of other toxic ingredients, shouldn't the CDC do some research and re-evaluate its
use in vaccines?
Monosodium glutamate, also known as MSG, has been used as a food additive for over a century,
but now it is also an ingredient in some vaccines.
Dr. Russell Blalock notes that the MSG is classified as an excitotoxin, or a compound
which overstimulates cell receptors to such an extent that the cell ceases to function
normally, resulting in damage to nerve cells and contributing to seizures.
DR.
SAHNI: Vaccines are grown in a substrate.
So, a substrate would be a petri dish.
It's basically a medium that the vaccine can be grown in.
There's viral vaccines, there's bacterial vaccines, and the vaccines can be grown in
human as well as animal tissue.
Basically, animal and human living tissue.
Some examples are chicken fibroblasts and embryos, chicken retinal and kidney cells,
monkey and dog kidney cells, human embryonic tissue, lung tissue, specifically the fibroblasts
found in aborted human fetal tissue, as well as monkey brain tissue.
And there's others, but these are some of the more common substrates that live vaccines
are grown in, in living cells.
The problem is that now we're finding that these substrates also contain other harmful
additives like glyphosate.
Glyphosate, which is Roundup, which is a pesticide, herbicide/pesticide, made by Monsanto, is
making its way into the vaccines as well.
We spray glyphosate ubiquitously, on so many food products, that they're actually finding
it in our vaccines.
So, we're getting injected with a vaccine—we're typically worried about things like thimerosal,
mercury, phenols, other chemicals, things like glycol, ethylene-glycol, which is basically
antifreeze, but also glyphosate.
In 2015, the World Health Organization actually declared glyphosate to be a probable carcinogen.
So, it's probably a carcinogen, and it's being injected into your body when you get
a vaccine.
In effect, injecting a vaccine into someone's body that is contaminated with a probable
carcinogen, glyphosate, probably deserves some congressional investigation in terms
of its safety.
TY: My son Bryce and I recently took a trip to Washington, DC, and we sat in meetings
with Senators and members of the House of Representatives that are attempting to sponsor
legislation to look into vaccine safety.
Dr. Sahni mentioned glyphosate specifically.
Here's MIT scientist, Stephanie Seneff, discussing this important issue.
STEPHANIE SENEFF: The glyphosate is a sleeper because its toxicity is insidious and accumulative
and so it slowly erodes your health over time, but it works synergistically with the vaccines.
This is what I'm finding and this is what I believe.
In particular, because glyphosate opens up the barriers.
It opens up the gut barrier and it opens up the brain barrier.
The brain has usually a very secure barrier that keeps toxins out, but the glyphosate
messes that up.
And as a consequence, those things that are in the vaccines get into the brain whereas
they wouldn't if you didn't have all the glyphosate exposure from the food.
So, the children who have sort of the leaky gut and they have the sensitivities to foods,
they have gluten intolerance, you know, those kids are the ones that are especially vulnerable
to damage from the vaccines because those are all indicators of glyphosate poisoning
and they're also indicators of leaky gut.
And leaky gut is an indicator of leaky brain.
So, the poor child is getting these vaccines and the stuff it's going into the brain and
it's causing neurological damage.
DR.
PALEVSKY: Something is happening to the brains of our children that is exciting, igniting,
inflaming, irritating, agitating, and interfering with the proper sequencing of how the nerve
cells sequence, develop, and proceed towards normal brain development.
Speech delay is not a given.
Learning disability is not a given.
Low tone, weak muscles, lack of coordination, not sitting still, not focusing, not paying
attention, these are not things that are a given.
They are only happening because something is irritating, inflaming, agitating the brain
and interfering with the way in which the brain is supposed to properly, sequentially
develop.
TY: There is a consensus in the scientific community that something is happening to the
brains of our children.
A surfactant is a compound that reduces the surface tension and increases the solubility
between two liquids that would normally be unable to dissolve together, like oil and
water.
In vaccines, Polysorbate-80 acts as an emulsifier to disperse all the other ingredients evenly
within a liquid.
Let's listen to medical doctors Toni Bark and Larry Palevsky.
DR.
BARK: We use Polysorbate, which the other name is Tween 80, to open the blood-brain
barrier when giving chemotherapy for brain cancer.
We know it opens tight junctions, desmosomes or the blood-brain barrier or the gut barrier.
They're all the same.
But the scientific or medical name for these things are tight junctions or desmosomes.
DR.
PALEVSKY: What we have is a lot of people who are espousing what other people tell them.
If I presented my medical research around vaccines to my colleagues in medicine, they
would be ashamed of themselves.
Because they would never know that the aluminum in vaccines is not the same aluminum that
you ingest or inhale, that the aluminum in vaccines is in such a structure that it can
easily pass into the brain, and bring with it viruses and bacteria, that the emulsifiers
in vaccines, called Polysorbate-80, are used by the pharmaceutical industry to get drugs
to pass into the brain across the blood-brain barrier.
But they're also in vaccines.
They also attach really strongly to aluminum.
As an adjuvant, aluminum has a kind of structure that binds tightly to the bacteria and the
viruses.
Then the Polysorbate-80, the emulsifier, binds really tightly to the aluminum and to the
bacteria and viruses and can walk into the brain the way a ghost can go through a wall.
The pharmaceutical industry uses particles like aluminum that are in vaccines to attach
to drugs, to get them to go across the blood-brain barrier because drugs don't go across the
blood-brain barrier otherwise.
Then the pharmaceutical industry uses an emulsifier like Polysorbate-80 to attach to the nanoparticle,
that aluminum-type particle that is bound to the drug to increase the entry of that
drug into the brain twenty-fold.
That same technology that the pharmaceutical industry uses to enhance delivery of drugs
across the blood-brain barrier into the brain is the same technology in vaccines.
Knowing that science, the question has to be asked, do vaccine materials enter the brain?
No studies.
Are vaccine materials supposed to get into the brain?
No.
If vaccine materials get into the brain, what happens?
One in six children with neurodevelopmental disabilities.
One in 50 with autism.
One in 10 with ADHD.
One in 20 below the age of five with seizures, until proven otherwise.
In 2011, there was a study published that surveyed over 91,000 children that showed
that 54 percent of those children had at least one of 20 chronic illness.
Here we are in 2016.
I started medical school in 1983.
These were not the data we were seeing.
TY: Dr. Palevsky stated that we need to do more testing of vaccines that contain substances
like Polysorbate-80 and assume that they are doing damage until proven otherwise.
According to the Material Safety and Data Sheet (MSDS) on sciencelab.com, Polysorbate-80
was tested for inhalation and ingestion, and demonstrated to be slightly hazardous in the
case of skin contact.
The MSDS does not address the effects of Polysorbate-80 through injection.
Nevertheless, in the same toxicology section, under "Special remarks on chronic and toxic
effects in humans," it states that Polysorbate-80 "may cause adverse reproductive effects
based on animal test data.
No human data found."
There appears to be a glaring lack of basic science research into the toxic effects of
the vaccine ingredient Polysorbate-80 on human health.
Some argue that ingredients like Polysorbate-80 in vaccines are safe and not dangerous, simply
because they are present in vaccines in miniscule amounts.
However, the fact remains that the CDC's mandated vaccine schedule directs doctors
to give infants and children 49 doses of vaccines by the age of six.
The CDC vaccine excipient and media summary indicates that the DTaP, influenza, meningococcal,
pneumococcal, rotavirus, and TDaP vaccines all contain Polysorbate-80.
What are the cumulative effects of multiple vaccine ingredients?
According to the MSDS, Polysorbate-80 "may cause cancer based upon animal test data"
and "may be mutagenic."
Should the vaccine manufacturers and the FDA be required to provide credible scientific
evidence that it is safe to include Polysorbate-80 in vaccines given to adults and children?
Another ingredient in many vaccines, which has already been mentioned many times, is
aluminum.
According to the CDC, aluminum is present in Hepatitis A, Hepatitis B, DTaP, TDaP, Haemophilus
Influenza Type B, HIB, HPV, and pneumococcal vaccines.
Aluminum is put into vaccines as an adjuvant, or an additive, that helps them work better.
DR.
BARK: Unless it's a live viral vaccine it's used as an adjuvant.
An adjuvant is something to boost the immune response.
Live virus, like the chicken pox vaccine, like MMR, those are all live viruses, and
the shingles vaccine.
One of the side effects of those vaccines is that they cause those diseases.
The shingles vaccine just had to add that, "By the way the shingles vaccine, one of
the side effects may be shingles."
If it's not a live viral virus vaccine, then they have to use something to boost it
because otherwise there's a weak immunological reaction.
TY: That's why the aluminum comes in.
DR.
BARK: That's where the aluminum comes in because your body doesn't like it.
It's toxic to the nervous system.
You create antibodies to it and everything associated with it.
That is a big part of the problem.
Then there's more biochemistry involved.
There's fluoride onboard.
There's a lot of fluoride.
If there's other things onboard it goes right into the central nervous system.
I mean, it's a mess.
DR.
GAMBRELL: Dr. Christopher Exley, who has been studying aluminum for over 30 years, he's
a specialist in the ecotoxicity of aluminum, has shown that aluminum can lead to food sensitivities,
so we're now reacting to foods that we wouldn't normally be reacting to.
There are mouse studies that show this.
Dr. Shaw has a study that shows when you inject the mouse with aluminum, and now they can't
tolerate that next bite of food that they eat.
They develop IGT antibodies to it.
We also know Dr. Schoenfeld has been studying autoimmune disease.
He's in Tel Aviv.
He's published over 1,600 papers, he's been cited over 20,000 times on PubMed, he's
written books.
He wrote the book, Vaccines and Autoimmunity, talking specifically about aluminum and how
it cools the body.
Meaning, there's increased food sensitivity.
There's increased autoimmune disease, so we're talking multiple sclerosis, lupus,
rheumatoid athritis, Alzheimer's, all these things are directly related to aluminum that's
being injected.
DR.
PALEVSKY: One thing that we don't always mention is the increasing incidence of neurodegenerative
diseases in adults.
And some of the studies about the aluminum nanoparticle that are being introduced show
that when you inject an aluminum nanoparticle, which again, is not the same aluminum that
we inhale or we ingest.
So, pediatricians who say "Oh, come on, the amount of aluminum that's in vaccines
is so small compared to what we are exposed to in our life," are not paying attention
to the fact that the aluminum is in a nanoparticle form.
It is bound tightly to vaccine bacteria and viruses, and it's bound tightly to Polysorbate-80,
and bound tightly to anything else that can bind to a nanoparticle and to an emulsifier
like Polysorbate-80.
These materials are not only getting into the brain, but the aluminum's being found
to stay inside the cells for years.
DR.
BARK: When you eat aluminum or you eat other toxins, you're open from your mouth—the
digestive system is an open system.
There should be an intact barrier protecting whatever we eat to go directly into the blood
stream.
Right?
TY: True.
DR.
BARK: Theoretically, you're not absorbing much aluminum when you eat it.
You excrete it in your stool.
It's still not good and I don't recommend it, but ingesting is very different than injecting,
where you also have things like Polysorbate-80, things that actually open your blood-brain
barrier.
They open all these tight junctions and you're getting them directly into your blood stream,
especially when you're injecting.
TY: There is a big difference between injecting aluminum and ingesting aluminum.
How much aluminum is safe?
DR.
THOMAS: How much aluminum is safe?
This is something I want us to talk about.
There's an FDA document that's live today.
It's been up since 2000.
It says not to exceed five micrograms per kilogram per day or you can cause neurological
problems and bone deposition and probably other problems.
The New England Journal of Medicine article, I think it was 1998, by Bishop, they found
that for every day you're on more than 5 micrograms per kilogram per day of Hypural,
which had that aluminum in it, you lost one point on your Bailey's developmental score.
So, this is significant developmental damage from aluminum.
Now the interesting thing that gets debated and it drives me nuts is that was a study
of Hypural.
Aluminum that was in the food that goes in the vein, and they talk about "parenteral
aluminum."
That's what the FDA put in their document.
That's what Bishop was talking about.
Parenteral means outside of the enteric system.
So, in other words, it's injected.
It's either directly in the vein, which is what they were referring to there.
But when you give a shot, that's parenteral.
You are not giving it through the oral cavity.
And the CDC has articles and statements about the safety of aluminum and they're using enteral
doses.
TY: Something you would ingest?
DR.
THOMAS: Yeah.
Our GI tract is like our skin.
It has an epithelial lining whose job is to protect us from toxins, and there's a whole
system set up in the GI tract to help you not have toxicity from what you eat, because
when you eat food and dirt and whatever, there's toxins.
We have a mechanism for avoiding toxicity when you take it orally.
You bypass those when you inject.
And so, this is why it is vital that we start looking at the aluminum content of vaccines
the same way we did for mercury, thimerosal.
Because we are far exceeding the safe doses.
NEIL MILLER: The aluminum that they put into these vaccines, kids at two months, four months,
six months, are getting overdosed with aluminum and there's very high aluminum content—
And children that receive their pneumococcal vaccine, their Hepatitis B, Hepatitis A, the
DTaP vaccine, these vaccines have high aluminum content, and the studies are showing that
the aluminum is causing neurological and immunological damage.
They're causing autoimmune diseases, and the FDA has established a safety level.
And children that receive the Hepatitis B vaccine at birth receive 20 times the content
of aluminum, 20 times above the FDA's safety level.
Children at two months of age are receiving 50 times above the safety level as established
by the FDA.
TY: Dr. Thomas just mentioned the term "parenteral" and he also mentioned an FDA document which
indicates the safe daily aluminum limits.
Neil Miller referenced the same FDA safety level.
I found the document.
According to the FDA's Code of Federal Regulations, CFR, Title 21, Volume 4, posted at FDA.gov,
the FDA maximum allowance for parenteral aluminum received is 25 micrograms per day.
As Dr. Thomas mentioned, parenteral means anything not given orally.
So, vaccines are considered to be parenteral.
According to the FDA regulation, the maximum aluminum per kilogram of weight to give to
a person is up to 5 micrograms.
And any product that has more than 25 micrograms of aluminum is supposed to have a warning
label stating that "Aluminum may be toxic to the central nervous system and to the bones,"
which Dr. Thomas just mentioned.
However, vaccines, for some reason, are not required to have this label and are not required
to follow the maximum dosage of 25 micrograms.
I got a degree in accounting at Baylor University, and my father was actually a math major at
Baylor.
So, humor me for a second, and let's go on a math journey together, okay?
Let's do some math.
Following the 5 micrograms per kilogram maximum allowable parenteral dose of aluminum, the
following are examples of weight with their corresponding maximum levels of aluminum,
per the FDA.
An 8-pound baby would be 18.16 micrograms of aluminum.
A 15-pound baby would be 34.05 micrograms of aluminum.
30-pound toddler, 68.1 micrograms of aluminum.
50-pound child, 113 micrograms.
150-pound adult, 340.5 micrograms of aluminum.
350-pound adult, 794.5 micrograms of aluminum.
So, exactly how much aluminum is in the vaccines that are routinely given to children?
The HIB vaccine, 225 micrograms per shot.
Hepatitis B, 250 micrograms per shot.
The DTaP, depending upon the manufacturer, it ranges from 170 to 625 micrograms.
The pneumococcal vaccine, 125 micrograms.
Hepatitis A, 250 micrograms.
HPV, 225 micrograms.
The Pentacel, DTaP, the HIB, and polio combo vaccine, 330 micrograms.
And the Pediatrix, DTaP, Hep B, and polio combo vaccine, 850 micrograms.
At birth, 99 percent of children in the United States are given the Hepatitis B vaccination.
If the baby is typical size and let's just say that he or she weighs 8 pounds, the amount
of aluminum in the Hepatitis B vaccine alone is almost 14 times the amount of aluminum
that is FDA approved.
In addition, at well-child checkups, it's common for two-month, four-month, six-month
appointments to include up to eight vaccinations that add up to more than 1,000 micrograms
of aluminum.
According to the FDA limits, that amount isn't even safe for a 350-pound adult.
DR.
MARGULIS: The issue there is aluminum is highly, highly neurotoxic, and a child who can't get
rid of neurotoxic aluminum is going to have brain damage from aluminum exposure.
We know that.
We have the science to show it.
DR.
GAMBRELL: I think it's important to see what we're seeing.
To actually look at the patient and change our mind when new information comes in.
We had an idea of what vaccines were over the last few decades.
We have an idea.
But in the last year, we found out that aluminum is neurotoxic, it's got autoimmune issues.
We found out that there's glyphosates in the vaccine.
Dr. Anthony Samsell and Stephanie Seneff at MIT just discovered that.
We're finding out all this new information.
So, I think any good scientist should take this new information and look at the picture
again.
We do that with anesthesia.
We previously weren't testing our anesthetics on children under two because there's an
FDA issue with trying to get children into studies and that's understandable.
But then when we saw there was a correlation that children were getting injured under age
two, they were looking at when children got anaesthesia for ear tube placement, that they
are having memory problems years later.
So they were able to tease that out.
There's a program called Smart Tots with anesthesia.
They were able to tease that out with anesthesia.
I think we should do the same thing with vaccines.
Now that we're coming with new data, new information about what vaccines are or aren't
doing, I think we should take a critical look, scientifically, on what is happening.
I think it's an imporant question.
DR.
THOMAS: What people don't realize is informed consent is only as informed as your doctor
is who's giving the informed consent.
Right?
So unfortunately, most of my peers don't even realize there's aluminum in these vaccines.
Or if they do, they don't know how much is in there.
If they do, they don't know what the safe dose is for aluminum.
Because you see, we were trained that aluminum's safe.
It's been in vaccines since the beginning of time and it was studied and it was proven
to be safe.
At least that's what we were told.
But if you go really look into it, there's hundreds of studies.
I have two books, entire books, just on aluminum toxicity.
There's ample information that should have us questioning what we are doing.
TY: Possibly the most widely-known and controversial ingredient in some vaccines is a preservative
called thimerosal, which is approximately 50 percent ethyl-mercury.
According to the CDC, "Flu vaccines in multi-dose vials contain thimerosal to safeguard against
contamination of the vial."
It's commonly believed that thimerosal, mercury, was removed from all childhood vaccines
over a decade ago.
DR.
PALEVSKY: Mercury is still in vaccines.
It's not just in the flu vaccine.
It's still in trace amounts, in the vaccines that previously had tremendous amounts of
mercury in it.
Thimerosal is still in the vaccines, ethyl-mercury being the organic form of mercury that's
in the thimerosal, is neurotoxic.
But now there's more aluminum in the vaccines.
Aluminum and mercury together potentiate its dangerous properties of creating death in
nerve cells than if you had just the aluminum and mercury alone.
TY: Dr. Palevsky just mentioned the term "trace amounts," which by the way, is the title
of an amazing documentary produced by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
On the CDC's vaccine excipient summary, many vaccines such as the DTaP, Hepatitis
A, Hepatitis B, and single-dose flu vaccines (like Fluvirin and Fluvarix) have thimerosal
listed as an ingredient.
But it has an asterisk.
At the bottom of the document, it states "Where thimerosal is marked with an asterisk, it
indicates that the product should be considered equivalent to thimerosal-free products.
This vaccine may contain trace amounts."
So, in essence, a thimerosal-free product may actually contain some thimerosal.
It's kind of like Stevia, which is an extract from the sweet leaves of the stevia plant,
and it's listed as having zero calories, or so I thought.
On the particular brand of Stevia which I use, there is also a little asterisk at the
bottom of the container, and it states, "Each 1-teaspoon serving contains less than 2 calories,
which the FDA considers dietetically zero."
As you already know from this episode earlier, I'm a math guy.
So, indulge me again.
Let's say that each packet contains 1.9 calories, which is about accurate from what
I can ascertain.
It's still considered to be calorie-free.
Now let's say I want to replace sugar with Stevia in a recipe, cup for cup.
If the recipe calls for 3 cups of sugar, I'll replace it with 3 cups of Stevia, which is
144 teaspoons at 48 teaspoons a cup.
This would equate to 273.6 calories from an alleged calorie-free substance.
So, back to trace amounts of thimerosal.
Exactly how much is a trace amount?
As we read earlier, the CDC says it's less than or equal to 0.3 micrograms per dose.
I'm not going to explain the math, but I'll put it on the screen right now.
And after we convert micrograms per milliliter to milligrams per kilogram, to parts per million,
to liters, to parts per billion, etcetera, etcetera, you get the picture.
We see that there can be up to 600 parts per billion of thimerosal in the thimerosal-free
vaccine.
Just to put this 600 parts per billion number in perspective, according to the EPA, 2 parts
per billion is the limit in drinking water, and if a liquid has 200 parts per billion
of mercury, then it's considered a toxic hazard.
In other words, thimerosal-free vaccines can contain 3 times the amount of mercury that
the EPA allows in a liquid before it's declared to be toxic waste.
And here's a 2005 study from Toxicological Sciences Journal that indicates thimerosal
at 1 part per billion is toxic to neurons.
As I mentioned earlier, I traveled to Washington, DC, and I attended a press conference where
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Robert DeNiro offered $100,000 to anyone who could find a study
indicating that thimerosal is safe.
ROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR.: We just did a press conference and we did this yesterday with
DeNiro.
We have 240 studies on thimerosal that says it's causing brain injury, it's causing
ADD/ADHD, speech delay, language delays in all kinds of rats, chipmunks and squirrels,
and hamsters, and gerbils, and cows and goats, and pheasants.
And we have that study, this high.
240 studies.
And we have 81 studies that show it causes autism.
This high.
And we have a little placard that says, "Studies that says it's safe."
None.
Not one.
And what DeNiro and I said, "We will pay $100,000 to anybody who can point to a single
peer-reviewed study that shows it's safe."
It doesn't exist.
TY: There are at least 240 studies that have focused on thimerosal and have found it to
be harmful, with adverse reactions including allergic reaction, malformations, autoimmunity,
developmental delay, and neurodevelopmental disorders, including tics, speech delay, language
delay, and ADD.
81 of these studies indicate a link with autism.
The Material Safety Data Sheet, the MSDS, for thimerosal indicates that it is mutagenic,
in other words, it affects genetic material, it damages kidneys, liver, spleen, bone marrow,
and the central nervous system, and may cause cancer based upon animal data.
It also adversely affects fertility and causes birth defects.
The toxicity of thimerosal was the focus of a meeting in June of 2000 at the Simpsonwood
Conference Center in Atlanta, Georgia.
The CDC commissioned a meeting with the World Health Organization, the FDA, Institute of
Medicine, and representatives of several vaccine manufacturers.
According to the transcripts of the Simpsonwood conference, which are readily available online
due to FOIA requests, the gist of the meeting was to convey the fact that the CDC's data
showed a statistically significant relationship between neurodevelopmental disorders, especially
autism, and thimerosal that children received through their vaccines.
One of the most telling quotes from that conference is from Dr. William Weil of the American Academy
of Pediatrics, "The number of dose-related relationships between mercury and autism are
linear and statistically significant.
You can play with this all you want.
They are linear.
They are statistically significant."
DR.
BUTTAR: You go all the way back Simpsonwood, when they had all the six pharmaceutical companies,
I believe it was, that got together and the Institute of Medicine was there.
The president of the Institute of Medicine had just had his grandson or granddaughter
born.
They were talking to the epidemiologist.
Basically, they were talking about the incidence of thimerosal, incidence of autism in children
that had been exposed to thimerosal in vaccines.
The epidemiologist said that there is not only a correlation but there is a high statistical
correlation between autism and the use of thimerosal.
The Institute of Medicine said, "Go back and reanalyze the data."
The epidemiologist said, "It doesn't matter how you manipulate this data.
It's so significant.
No matter what you do it's going to show up."
And the president of the Institute of Medicine at that time made the comment.
And this is part of the transcripts that have been discovered.
Part of the transcript said—he made that comment.
He said, "My grandson (or granddaughter, I can't remember what it was) is not going
to get this."
It was just born.
The child was just born.
He said, "My grandchild is not going to get this.
However, we cannot let the general public know this information."
Why?
Because if they know it will cause mass chaos, right?
If there was going to be a motivation for the next civil war, that would be it.
TY: Yeah.
You're messing with our kids.
DR.
BUTTAR: That's right.
That's exactly right.
DR.
BARK: They looked at mercury and thimerosal in vaccinations and they looked at the association
between thimerosal and how early infants are exposed to it.
What they found in the data, which they said, "We can't make this go away."
That was literally written in some of the FOIA documents.
The earlier the exposure, the greater the risk for autism.
Okay, so what happens?
Well, at the same meeting we see a recommendation to start pushing the flu shot on pregnant
women.
The flu shot has mercury in it.
TY: That's really, really, really early exposure for the infant.
DR.
BARK: Yeah.
I'm sitting next to a legal expert when I'm hearing this because I'm hearing—I
got this information at a conference and it was Brian Hooker, Dr. Hooker who was presenting
his FOIA documents.
This was before he talked about the CDC whistleblower.
Well, actually he did talk about it but we didn't know who it was.
He was explaining this data and we saw the data from the documents.
I'm sitting next to Mary Holland.
You know who she is?
She's a—
TY: Yes.
DR.
BARK: She's fabulous.
Right.
Mary looks at me, she goes, "Wait a minute, the earlier the exposure to thimerosal the
greater the risk for autism.
Why would they turn around and recommend to give the flu shot with thimerosal in it to
pregnant women?"
DR.
THOMAS: And this is the ongoing crime when it comes to thimerosal.
It makes absolutely no sense to me why they chose to leave it in the multi-dose flu shot.
So that's the major source of thimerosal today.
The multi-dose flu shot still has 25 micrograms of thimerosal.
That's a huge dose, especially if given to an infant or—I'm horrified that we're doing
vaccines to pregnant women.
No testing, there is absolutely no testing.
You just read the package insert from the vaccine manufacturer.
It says, "Never tested in pregnancy," all right, and yet, our CDC has recommended
over the past few years, they've added the flu shot for pregnancy.
And in fact, some moms are getting two flu shots because their pregnancy spans two seasons.
And then, just the last couple of years, they've really made a huge push to add the TDaP, the
tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis.
That's another whole story, but the problem with that one is a huge dose of aluminum,
injecting it, so you're kind of like mainlining a toxin to a developing brain.
No testing.
You can go to the CDC website and go to Vaccines and Pregnancy, and you can look at the articles
that they list as justification for doing those, and I've looked at them.
I've pulled every single article and read it word for word.
There are no long-term studies.
They're all very short-term, very small numbers, sometimes 100 or less pregnancies, and what
they're calling safe has nothing to do with looking at neurotoxicity.
ROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR.: Every freshwater fish in America now has advisories on it telling
pregnant women not to eat it.
The mercury in thimerosal is 50 times as toxic to brain tissue and twice as persistent in
the brain as the mercury in fish.
So why would we inject that into a pregnant woman or a little baby?
It doesn't make any sense.
TY: Robert F. Kennedy just mentioned that thimerosal, ethyl-mercury, is 50 times as
toxic to brain tissue and twice as persistent as methyl-mercury.
These figures were taken from the 2012 Guzzi study and the 2005 Burbacher study.
A recent 2017 CDC study, published in the Reviews of Environmental Contamination and
Toxicology, also confirmed that ethyl-mercury is more toxic than methyl-mercury.
Mercury toxicity is one of the CDC's top concerns.
DR.
BUTTAR: When I met with the Centers for Disease Control, the second time I met with them in
2006, I was going through one of their manuals and I was with—I won't say who the person
was but it was a very high level individual in the CDC, MD–PhD, a great guy.
Just to give you an idea, what was supposed to be half hour meeting, it ended up being
a six-hour meeting.
When I left we actually hugged because he was so appreciative that there were actually
people out there—he had no idea there are people out there that were actually addressing
some of these things.
So, there are people at the CDC and the government that are actually well-versed and know the
truth and really want to do something.
They have the right motivation.
Not everybody is like that, but there are people out there.
Just in case people think that everybody is against us, well there are good people out
there.
During our conversation, I asked him.
I said, "What's your most significant—" And I'm flipping through this catalog.
It's a directory of all these different toxic materials.
So, I expected him to tell me it was going to be one of the fluorinated hydrocarbons
that's the biggest concern for the CDC from a level of toxicity aspect.
And he said—this is why I can't say his name.
He said, "If you bring this up in public, I will deny it."
He thought it was like a trick question.
I'm looking at him thinking what's the big deal?
His number one concern: it's not persistent organic pollutants.
It's metal related.
Mercury is a number one concern.
Number one.
The second most toxic substance known to man according to the Centers for Disease Control
and the Environmental Protection Agency is mercury.
So how can the second most toxic substance known to man on this entire planet be good
for you?
TY: Are you enjoying Episode 2 thus far?
Are you learning a lot of great information?
Do you want to join our movement and support our mission to educate the entire world on
the truth about vaccines?
Then please consider supporting out mission by owning the complete series today.
Your support allows us to continue to spread the truth for free.
Plus, a portion of each sale is donated to charities that are doing real research and
helping our kids be healthier and safer.
Simply click the banner below to join the movement and support our mission.
Thanks in advance.
Now, let's get back to episode number 2 for more life-changing information on vaccines.
ROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR.: My book, Thimerosal, is a summary of all the science that has been
done on thimerosal, all the published peer-reviewed studies.
We spent three years writing this.
I had a team.
I raised a quarter million dollars to make sure we looked at every scientific study that
was ever done.
We did not cherry-pick studies, we put everything in here.
We found over 1,400 references, over 400 studies, close to 500 studies and virtually all of
them say the same thing that thimerosal is a potent neurotoxin also that does horrendous
damage to the other organs in the body.
It's reactive with human tissue.
It's the most neurotoxic element in the universe that we know of that is not radioactive and
the science was really clear.
And I was kind of naive when I wrote this book because I thought people were saying,
"Oh, the science is clear, the science says that there is no link between thimerosal and
autism."
But I was reading science and couldn't verify that.
Not only that, the science I was reading was saying just the opposite.
I assumed that if people saw what the science said, that the policies would then follow
and the attitudes would then follow.
But what I encountered was in the establishment, the medical establishment, the pharmaceutical
industry, and the vaccine industry was more a can-do religion than science.
There are six documents, six scientific studies that the CDC has relied on that are on its
website.
But all six of those studies have been discredited and in fact they're so badly discredited that
when the Institute of Medicine asked to review the science of those studies, CDC instructed
them not to and threatened to defund the Institute of Medicine if the Institute of Medicine tried
to review those studies.
It's clear that the CDC knows the studies are fraudulent.
The principal CDC author of the—there's essentially three American studies and three
foreign studies, Scandinavian studies.
The author of their Scandinavian studies, Paol Thorsen, who was the CDC liaison and
the data collector, is now on the run from the FBI and from Interpol for having stolen
the money he was supposed to spend on that study, a million dollars from CDC.
He's been fired by his university in Aarhus in Denmark and he is facing 22 counts of wire
fraud and theft, and he's wanted by Interpol and the FBI, and yet his studies are still
up on CDC's sites as the principle studies that supposedly exonerate thimerosal from
the autism epidemic.
TY: Next up, we have a couple of brief interviews with parents of vaccine-damaged children who
believe that thimerosal was one of the culprits.
I want to hear about your story, I guess with Aiden specifically.
APRIL BODEN: Yeah.
He was crawling.
He was very physical, crawling at four months, and then he started walking when he was about
10 months, and he was talking by a year.
He was already saying certain things like his body parts, his hands, his head.
He was identifying characters on Sesame Street, like Elmo.
And then a month later, we went in for his immunization shots at 13 months.
He got the MMR, the pneumococcal, and the chicken pox vaccine, the varicella, on that
one day.
And then he stopped.
The words that he was learning stopped.
And then he also started having this kind of bizarre behavior, this self-stimulatory
behavior, and pounding on the floor, and lining things up.
So, the next time I went in to bring him into the doctor, several months later, I told her
about it, and that I was concerned with his speech.
And he was doing kind of some babbling in the office, and she said "No, he's fine.
He seems to be okay for his age."
And she gave him some more shots, and then that was the end of the babbling.
The little language that he did have still was gone.
TY: Wow.
You said she gave him more shots.
What shots did she give him then?
APRIL BODEN: I think that time he had the DPT and the polio.
As his language just disappeared completely, and some of the behaviors became bizarre,
like he was hitting his head and doing things that were kind of weird and dangerous, then
we took him back to the doctor and they diagnosed him with autism.
TY: In your line of work then, you're dealing with parents and children all day long that
have been injured?
ROBERT KRAKOW: Parents and children and adults.
Most of the cases that come in that are viable are adults, flu shot victims, Guillain-Barre
syndrome which is peripheral neuropathy, Hepatitis B injuries, Gardasil injuries, which I think
you've heard about, Gardasil and Cervarix.
In some ways, I think the reason that adults have cases that are more viable—I hear a
lot of cases with children, but we can't prove any of those cases, is because with
adults—first of all they can speak.
They're not infants.
They can articulate the symptoms.
They can be tested.
The syndromes that they're experiencing are more identifiable.
So, it's easier for a court to fit it into their standards of proof.
Then I had the experience with my own son, where we saw effects of post-flu shot.
We believe that the vaccine played a role in my son's regression.
Again, a court disagrees with that.
But that opened my eyes to what vaccines can do.
And in fact, what I discovered, among other things, it's the policy of our country,
in the United States, that vaccines cause injury.
That's why you have a Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, because it's understood.
It's also understood, in the law, in the cases, that no one really understands how
vaccines affect the human body.
That's almost a direct quote from a case.
So, we don't know that.
So, what we decide is to protect the vaccine industry.
"We're going to compensate people, but we're only going to go so far, because we
don't know what really causes it, and we're going to put the burden on the injured person
and set up this Vaccine Injury Program, which we work in."
But it's limited.
And some people do get compensation.
There are settlements all the time, and that's good.
I'm not one of the people who say "This vaccine program is horrible.
It should be destroyed."
But there are certain limitations to it.
And originally, that program was not designed to provide complete immunity for the vaccine
industry.
However, the way it's been interpreted has, in effect, provided that immunity.
That prevents us from getting information in discovery.
So, if you sue a defendant, a vaccine manufacturer, if you have a viable claim that has some basis,
you will be able to get them to answer questions.
You'll be able to get them to turn over documents.
You'll be able to see what their research is.
We are unable to reach into the vaccine manufacturers, who do the internal research, except for some
rare cases where the documents have been leaked.
So, we are unable to develop the information that will enable us to show whether or not
vaccines cause injury.
But what we did learn from William Thompson, is that the data that the CDC has used in
several studies.
There's a study called—I don't remember the name.
But there's the Thompson study, there's the Price study, there's the Tozzi study.
The data strongly suggests that thimerosal in vaccine causes harm.
And those cases, tics in several of the cases, speech pathology.
So, that's a window into this.
We need to find more.
We need to delve into more, but we're road-blocked by the immunity provisions.
TY: Oh, okay.
ROBERT KRAKOW: So, it's been a struggle.
We are working on different avenues to try to get at the truth, all in the interest of
protecting children and getting simple justice for our own children.
TY: That's our goal: protecting children.
Are vaccines safe and effective?
We're told that they are, but we've just seen a couple of personal stories that might
lead you to question whether they are actually safe.
But what about vaccines being considered effective?
As far as being effective, Sherri, are they not effective at preventing disease?
Or what does it mean when they say that these vaccines are effective?
DR.
TENPENNY: What it means by the Webster's definition of effective, it means that you
do something that achieves the intended goal.
So, the intended goal of when I inject a vaccine into your arm is for you to create an antibody.
And so, if the vaccine does that, if I inject you and it creates an antibody, it's effective.
It's created what it was intended to do.
But just the mere presence of having an antibody is not the same thing as protecting you from
getting sick.
Vaccines are effective if you use the scientific word, but they do not protect you from getting
sick.
Because there are many, many substances or circumstances in the medical literature that
shows that you can have high antibody levels and still contract the illness.
That's even true for tetanus, that you can have very high tetanus antibodies and unless
you thoroughly clean out the wound, there's a strong possibility you may contract the
infection called tetanus.
DR.
BELL: The idea of vaccination, if we come to a modern immunological perspective, is
the stimulation of the immune system to produce an antibody for a disease that they don't
want you to get or manifest, and this is the idea and of course they inject it primarily.
There are a few exceptions to that.
But they've done it in a more high tech so-called scientific way so it sounds like "Well it's
in a syringe.
It's got to be really scientific.
It's not the same as just gathering pus from a cow udder and cutting you open and putting
it in."
But it's really not that much different.
DR.
MIKOVITS: The parents don't know.
The doctors are bullied by the CDC.
The doctors are bullied by the bottom line, by the health insurance, they're mandated,
"Get the next shot, get the next shot."
Then they bully the families into saying, "Look how sick he is.
If you don't give him this, he's going to get sicker."
The parents don't know.
They go to neurologists.
Neurologists are not immunologists.
This is not neurology.
This is immunology.
This is vaccine injury and we just haven't explored it for the entire last two decades.
We've done nothing since we've discovered an entire arm of the immune system, that of
the adaptive T-Cell immune responses.
All our vaccines generated, we're not talking about a vaccine anymore, an antibody response
is not a protective immune response.
DR.
TENPENNY: I've got the transcript, it's about this thick, from right around 2000,
where they sat and they talked about these antibodies.
And they go "Well, we don't really want to bring up the whole discussion about antibodies
because we don't really know what it means.
We don't really know if they work.
Let's just sort of drop that."
I've got the whole transcript.
TY: Really?
After our interview, Dr. Tenpenny shared with me the entire transcript.
Here it is.
As you can see, this document is from CBER, or the Center for Biologics Evaluation Research.
Now according to FDA.gov, CBER is the center within the FDA that regulates biological products,
making sure that they are safe and effective.
You can clearly see in the document from all the orange sticky notes, the CBER clearly
acknowledges multiple times that creating an antibody response, which is how we measure
the effectiveness of a vaccine, has nothing to do with protecting the person from the
disease.
In other words, a vaccine can be deemed to be effective at creating an antibody response,
but that will not necessarily protect them from the disease.
DR.
THOMAS: What parents don't realize is when you go into a hospital and you sign and give
permission for them to do all the routine care, you just gave permission for that vaccine.
It will happen shortly after you deliver that baby.
There won't be another discussion about it, because you're not going to see the pediatrician
until hours after birth.
You're going to finish delivering your baby, you'll get a little bit of skin time and
the nurses "We're going to dry the baby off" and they take the baby away and bam,
bam, ointment.
It happens like that.
Like clockwork in every hospital in America, it is a standing order, at least it is in
all the hospitals in Portland, Oregon, and in my understanding, it is that way everywhere.
DR.
MARGULIS: The idea that the state legislators would want to force parents into taking vaccines
that they don't want or that their family doesn't need really didn't sit well with me.
So even as someone who is grateful for vaccines, who has vaccinated her own children because
my kids have been vaccinated, I feel very strongly that parents must have a choice whether
or not they want to vaccinate their kids.
And there's no such thing as one-size-fits-all medicine.
Which means that what's right for my family – for example the yellow fever vaccine is
one that we did because we went to West Africa.
What's right for my family is not necessarily right for your family.
And every family should have the right to opt out.
Every family should have the right to decide which vaccines are right for their children
at what time.
And obviously if vaccines work and they're safe and effective we would never worry about
somebody else's child not being vaccinated.
So, it's completely ridiculous to say that "You must do vaccines in order to protect
my child."
Because if I want to protect my child I can vaccinate my child.
You can do what you want.
That's your decision in your family based on your children's genetic vulnerabilities
and your own medical history and your own exposure to disease.
Medical intervention always has to be a choice.
TY: That last statement sums up one of the main focuses of "The Truth About Vaccines."
Medical intervention must always be a choice.
What about polio?
Was the polio vaccine effective at eradicating polio, and what exactly is polio?
DR.
TENPENNY: Polio is not a synonym for paralysis.
Most people, the vast majority of people, even at the height where people were contracting
paralysis, they would get exposed to the polio virus, which is a gastrointestinal virus that
looked like the stomach flu.
What people don't realize is there are at least seven or eight other families of viruses
that can cause paralysis.
So, when they show you these pictures of kids from Africa or people with a limb that's
deformed or they're dragging a limb, they're saying, "see, this was polio."
Well, it may have been one of the other viruses that cause paralysis.
DR.
HUMPHRIES: Poliomyelitis is a description of what happens physiologically in the body,
where the anterior horn of the spinal cord is altered, and then the nerves and the muscles
have downstream effects.
And they can vary in intensity and duration, and it also can affect the brain stem.
And those are the worst kinds of poliomyelitis.
Those are the ones where the breathing centers are shut down and the iron lung was needed
at the time.
You could die from that one.
So, I also want to remind people that even during the worst outbreaks of polio, 95 percent—so,
if we had 100 people, and we infected all of them with polio (it's a virus that's
swallowed) that 95 percent of them wouldn't even know that they had an infection.
There'd be no symptoms whatsoever and there would be immunity.
And then four percent would maybe have some malaise, maybe some muscle aches, some diarrhea,
and then recover.
And then one percent would have paralysis of one or two muscle groups that would last
for 24 hours.
And then 5-10 percent of those could have long-term paralysis.
So, the poliomyelitis was actually a very low-incidence disease.
Poliomyelitis being a description of a physiology doesn't actually tell you what the cause
is.
That's really key to understanding what polio was and why we say it's eradicated
in the United States.
Even though we have cases of poliomyelitis today, we don't necessarily have polio virus-induced
cases of poliomyelitis, because the fact is, that even back in the 1940s and 1950s, that
any one of a number of infections could have caused poliomyelitis.
And that was actually determined later, after the vaccine was released, when outbreaks would
occur and the authorities wanted to distinguish what was actually polio virus from what wasn't.
And what they found was that roughly a little more than one-quarter was polio virus, and
the rest were other viruses, coxsackievirus, etcetera, that can cause paralysis.
And then they found no virus at all in a lot of people.
So, DDT and arsenic are known causes of anterior horn spinal cord disease that can mimic poliomyelitis
from start to finish, even from a sore throat, the feeling of swelling in the throat, the
fevers, the aches and pains, to a tee.
TY: I was under the assumption that polio was synonymous with paralysis.
But apparently, I was mistaken, as 95 percent of people with polio have no symptoms whatsoever.
And less than one percent of people with polio actually suffer paralysis.
Dr. Humphries just mentioned that DDT and arsenic are both known causes of anterior
horn spinal disease, which looks just like paralytic polio.
Let's learn more about this intriguing subject from Dr. Rashid Buttar.
DR.
BUTTAR: What's really interesting is when you start looking at the incidence of usage
of certain chemicals.
For example, I wasn't alive at that time and neither were you, but back in the 40s,
in 50s they used to say, "I've had my DDT, so I'm insect free," or something
like that.
TY: I've seen a cartoon and there was a newspaper at that time that said, "DDT is
good for me."
DR.
BUTTAR: That's right.
"DDT is good for me.
And flies won't bother me because I've had my DDT."
There were a slew of slogans like that.
Remember back in the 50s and 60s again, not remember because you and I weren't alive
then, we were alive in the 60s but not in the 50s.
They actually used to say cigarettes, "A cigarette a day will keep the doctor away."
TY: "A pack a day keeps lung cancer away."
I've seen that one.
DR.
BUTTAR: Exactly.
So, these are strange things that they believed back then.
Now we're talking about vaccines are important and they've stamped out all these diseases.
Well, look at polio.
Polio is supposed to have been stamped out because of vaccines.
That's BS.
You look at it on the graph on the use of DDT and you look at the incidence of polio.
They are exactly the same graph except that polio followed DDT by about six months.
So, as DDT peaked, six months later polio peaked.
DDT comes down, six months later polio comes down.
DDT flat lines, polio flat lines.
It follows the contour.
It's like taking the same graph and just displacing it by six months.
TY: Invented in the late 19th century as a nerve gas chemical weapon, in 1938, DDT was
repackaged for use as a mosquito killer.
It was applied liberally from 1943 through 1952 on swimming pools and school cafeterias
full of children.
I checked out the graphs, and Dr. Buttar was 100 percent accurate.
The rise and fall of polio does actually correspond with the usage of DDT.
Notice that in 1948, the DDT usage was at its lowest, and then in 1951 it was at its
highest.
Now look at this graph of polio cases beginning in 1950.
As you can clearly see, they peaked in 1951-1952, with approximately 58,000 cases.
Then they began to decline drastically.
In 1955, the year the polio vaccine was introduced, there were 28,985 cases of polio.
Is it possible that many cases of polio were actually DDT poisoning?
Is it possible that the decrease in DDT was a contributing factor in the reduction of
polio cases?
Or are there other factors as well?
NEIL MILLER: Back in the late 1950s and 1960s, they actually legally changed the definition
of polio when they came out with the polio vaccine.
They made it much more difficult to diagnose cases of polio when they came out with the
polio vaccine.
So, that was partially responsible for the making the vaccine look more effective than
it was at the time.
DR.
HUMPHRIES: Well, they did a couple of things.
So, in the beginning it was highly inflated.
For instance, in order to get subsidized—these cases that were in the hospitals being treated
anyone could make the diagnosis of polio before the vaccine.
So, all it took was somebody to do an exam, two exams 24 hours apart, and finding one
or more muscle groups that had paralysis.
That would be called polio.
There was no blood or stool testing or anything like that.
Then after the vaccine was released, not just anybody could confirm a case of polio, and
there had to be two examinations done 60 days apart that showed one or more muscle groups
that remained paralyzed for 60 days.
Now mind you, the majority of paralytic polio, even back in 1954, would resolve within 60
days.
So, just by changing that diagnostic criteria they eliminated a huge amount of polio.
There were cases that were called aseptic meningitis.
So, this was polio but not necessarily paralysis.
Those were all taken off the books as being called polio.
They increased the number of cases that needed to occur in order to be called an epidemic.
These were some of the moves that were made at the time and then they started testing
for the actual virus.
So, that eliminated—so whether or not a vaccine ever came out, polio would have decreased
probably down by three-quarters just because of the change in the criteria.
TY: The first polio vaccine was the inactivated, in other words, the killed polio vaccine.
It was developed by Jonas Salk and came into use in 1955.
Albert Sabin's live polio vaccine was introduced in 1960.
The standards for defining polio were changed in 1955 when the Salk polio vaccine was introduced.
The new definition of "polio epidemic" required more cases to be reported.
"Paralytic polio" was redefined as well, making it more difficult to confirm, and therefore
to tally.
Also, after the vaccine was introduced, cases of aseptic meningitis, which is an infectious
disease often difficult to distinguish from polio, were supposed to be reported as a different
disease than polio, but before the polio vaccine, these cases were counted as polio.
Here's a chart that's based on a Los Angeles County health index on morbidity and mortality
of reportable diseases.
As you can see, in Los Angeles County, in July 1955, right before the polio vaccine
was introduced, there were 273 cases of polio and 50 cases of aseptic meningitis.
But then, six years later, in 1961, there were 65 cases of polio and 161 cases of aseptic
meningitis.
Those numbers were 5 and 256, respectively, by the year 1966.
Is it possible that it only appeared that polio was eradicated because they changed
the criteria for diagnosing polio, and thus giving rise to a spike in cases of aseptic
meningitis?
DR.
HUMPHRIES: The fact of the matter is that the first vaccines that were released had
live virus in them and were actually causing more paralysis than they were preventing.
That's again very well demonstrated in graphics from I believe it was 1954 to 1958.
There's a graph in the book that shows you the amounts of poliomyelitis or paralysis
that was occurring and was occurring largely in vaccinated populations.
The only reason that vaccine didn't cause more problems than it did was because that
the majority of the population was already immune to polio.
So, they could be injected with the live vaccine and not have an effect from it.
But it would have been a disaster had it been what we call a "virgin population" who
had never been exposed to it.
It would have been an absolute medical disaster.
The Cutter incident was a medical disaster where there was very highly-packed vaccine
with live virus given to the public and so Cutter basically took the rap for that problem
and had to close their doors, but the truth was that Wyeth was also releasing similar
vaccine.
TY: The Cutter incident is an example of the polio vaccine actually causing polio due because
of an insufficiently killed virus in the Salk polio vaccine from Cutter laboratories in
Berkley, California.
Over 40,000 children were infected, many were paralyzed, and many died.
In 1977, Dr. Jonas Salk testified, along with other scientists, that mass inoculation against
polio was the cause of most polio cases throughout the USA since 1961.
Are there instances of the polio vaccine causing other diseases like cancer?
What do you know, Barbara, about the Salk and Sabin versions of the polio vaccine?
BARBARA LOE FISHER: Well we know that the original Salk inactivated vaccines, polio
vaccines, that were given to over a hundred million children, including me, I got several
Salk polio shots, were contaminated with Simian virus 40, because those vaccines used rhesus
monkey kidney tissue cells to produce the vaccines.
In 1960, an NIH scientist, Bernice Eddy, found that rhesus monkey kidney cells that were
used to produce the inactivated Salk vaccine caused cancer when they were injected into
hamsters.
SAYER JI: Even today, I for one, likely have SV40 in my body because my mom received the
vaccine.
It gets passed down trans-generationally even though I didn't receive that vaccine.
It stays in our body.
It's passed down into future generations, potentially forever.
That is one of the, sort of, Pandora's Box events that occurred in the history of vaccination.
BARBARA LOE FISHER: Fast forward to the 1990s, researchers began to culture out SV40 DNA
from the tumors, the cancerous tumors of children and adults suffering with bone, brain, and
lung cancer.
SV40 DNA.
They made an association between the contaminated polio vaccines and the SV40 DNA that they're
culturing out.
Independent labs across the world confirmed SV40 DNA in these cancers.
Not only adults that got the vaccines, but children.
The government, the federal government, said "No association.
There's no association between SV40 DNA in these tumors and the cancers."
It continues to be an outstanding question about whether the people like me and others
who got contaminated vaccines, contaminated with a Simian virus, a monkey virus, potentially
passed down to their children the SV40 DNA that then caused brain, bone, and lung cancers
in these children as well as in the adults who got them.
This is still an outstanding question.
Nobody wants to talk about it.
You won't find anybody talking about it because the scientists in the 90s who tried
to look into this and say something about it, were vilified.
And these were scientists from very prestigious universities.
Whenever doctors and scientists try to do the right thing when it comes to vaccine risk
issues, they are punished.
They are punished by the government, they lose government grants, they are vilified
in the media.
It's the same with a physician who steps forward and tries to be honest and recognize
and have a conscience and say "We need to do something different.
We need to care about these children."
Demonized, vilified, as if trying to drum these people out of society, because they
were honest.
This is not the way that science should be conducted.
It's not the way that we should be rewarding people who are trying to do the right thing.
TY: In 2002, the British journal Lancet, published compelling evidence to support the polio vaccine
link to cancer.
In the article, the authors assert that the polio vaccine contaminated with SV40 was responsible
for up to half of the 55,000 non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma cases that were occurring each year.
Dr. Maurice Hilleman was the developer of Merck's vaccine program.
He developed over three dozen vaccines, more than any other scientist in history.
He was a member of the United States National Academy of Science, the Institute of Medicine,
the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and the American Philosophical Society.
He received a special lifetime achievement award from the World Health Organization.
Hilleman was one of the early vaccine pioneers to warn about the possibility that simian
viruses might contaminate vaccines.
In total, over 60 different lab studies have linked the Salk polio vaccine to cancer, which
Hilleman admits was the responsibility of Merck.
I learned recently that the oral polio vaccine actually sheds polio.
What exactly does that mean?
Let's listen to Dr. Shawn Centers explain.
DR.
CENTERS: Take something like the polio virus.
The oral polio has had a number of issues.
When I was a resident back in the late 1990s, we still gave an oral polio vaccine, which
is you took a little liquid and you swallowed it.
But because that was a live virus, every year there were hundreds of children who were actually
getting polio.
TY: From the oral vaccine?
DR.
CENTERS: From the oral vaccine.
And so, around '99-2000, they made the decision, because of this, to stop giving the oral polio,
and they now have it in inactivated form, which obviously is safer.
But then there's also the question of even whether this vaccine is effective.
There are three types of wild polio: 1, 2 and 3.
And type 1 and 3 was highly protective with the oral polio vaccine.
But type 2, with the inactivated polio, which is what we use now, it's not very effective.
So, you have hundreds of thousands of millions of parents who think that their child is protected
from polio because they have this inactivated polio vaccine, but in fact, that may not be
the case.
DR.
BARK: So, the oral polio shot, which we don't give in this country since 2000, because every
case of polio, since the 60s was from the vaccine.
The oral polio vaccine is a live vaccine and was shedding.
People shed and get polio from it and give it to other people.
We halted the use of it but it's what they use in third-world countries because it's
cheap.
TY: We're having these polio outbreaks.
DR.
BARK: We're having polio outbreaks and people are like, "Oh we need to vaccinate, we need
to vaccinate with more OPV."
The Gates foundation came to the Uttar Pradesh in India in 2010 or 2011, because there was
like, on average 9 or 10 cases of wild polio every year out of millions of people.
They had this polio campaign with the OPV.
Within two years there were 47,500 cases of flaccid paralysis or polio.
They're not calling it polio.
TY: They changed the name, right?
DR.
BARK: They changed the name—it's basically what you would call polio.
These kids are paralyzed or they died from paralysis.
And Bill Gates, at least it's said it was Bill Gates, and the Huffington post wrote
an article, how, "Oh my God we've eradicated wild polio in India in Uttar Pradesh."
Wild, he said "wild."
He couldn't say polio because the vaccine strain is causing outbreaks.
You can't use live viruses in a vaccine in areas where there is no sewage and no clean
water.
MIKE ADAMS: Allopathic medicine takes a contrarian approach to viruses, and look at the results
of that.
They want to attack every virus or bacteria with a chemical.
What has that led to decades later, a century into allopathic medicine?
What do we have?
Drug-resistant superbugs that now threaten humanity.
We've reached the era of the end of antibiotics, and that's a statement from the World Health
Organization.
That's not just Mike Adams saying that, right?
We have reached a time when you could die from a superbug infection from getting a scratch
and going to the hospital where you're likely to be infected by other patients and doctors
and health practitioners who do not follow sanitary practices, who are actually spreading
disease.
The system of modern medicine is doing more of the spreading of disease than the prevention
of disease.
Now a holistic approach to this would say, let's strengthen the vitality of the patient,
let's change their terrain.
Let's give them the biochemistry tools in their own bodies to respond and adapt and
overcome infections.
And once you do that, they're immune to so many things that could come out there, whether
that virus mutates or not.
Remember even the CDC admits that oftentimes the flu shot is completely ineffective because
they chose the wrong strain of the virus.
But if you have natural immunity in your body, in your system, then that is more than broad-spectrum
immunity against more mutant variations of that virus.
If you go the vaccine route, you have to be lucky and make sure that they hit you with
just that right strain, which is usually last year's circulating virus.
This is why I say vaccines are great for time travelers.
If you want to go back to last year and maybe vaccine could help you.
But for this year, the virus is already mutated.
So, you need an adaptive response from your body that can adapt to all those mutations
in real time, usually in a symptomless way when you don't even know that you were exposed
or that you adapted.
Also, one more thing, Ty, remember that you cannot turn off your immune response either.
It's automatic, built in your system.
It's part of who you are.
It's part of your biology, your chemistry, even your spirit, your consciousness I believe.
It's part of you.
You can't turn it off.
If the virus comes in and starts attacking your body, your body responds to it as long
as it has the tools and the immunology.
DR.
MARGULIS: The truth is there is actually, and this is another thing that's very hard
for people to understand, but there are benefits to getting certain illnesses.
We know that.
We know that exposure to certain diseases will reduce our risk of problems later in
life.
We actually know that certain infectious diseases help us not get autoimmune disorders.
That's something that's very hard for Americans to understand because we've been fed so much
propaganda and so much fear mongering.
A parent who chooses not to vaccinate is making a decision.
They're making an evidence-based decision that they would rather take the risk of being
exposed to infectious disease than they would in taking the risk of being exposed to vaccines.
That is an absolutely reasonable, smart, and evidence-based choice.
It might not be the choice that I make.
I might decide that I'm afraid of my child being exposed to polio and getting polio.
And you might decide that you're not afraid of your child getting polio.
But those are appropriate decisions and that's an appropriate conversation to have.
There's no "anti" or "pro" here.
There is no good or bad here.
It's taking the information you have and making the best decision you can with it.
TY: There is no anti or pro.
It's just making good decisions using the knowledge that we have and exercising our
freedom of choice.
All parents love their children, and all parents want to make the best health decisions for
their children.
We should all do our due diligence and become educated on vaccines.
Here's Erin Elizabeth, who sustained a vaccine injury as a child, with some encouraging words.
ERIN ELIZABETH: Growing up in the 70s, we actually had some of the hippies who didn't
really vaccinate back then.
That was kind of that mentality where some didn't.
And the few friends I had who weren't vaccinated were the healthiest of all.
They didn't have colds, they weren't sick.
They were eating their organic granola, healthy as can be.
I don't want my parents to feel guilty.
They're still pro-vaccine, although I think they're opening their eyes to these things.
I think that they—but I never want them to feel any kind of guilt or anything.
It's just they were doing what the pediatrician told them.
BARBARA LOE FISHER: So many people will do due diligence and research when they go to
buy a car, when they go to buy a house, but when someone's going to inject something
into you or your child, you don't do that same due diligence.
And yet, the vaccine you get could harm you.
Unpredictably you can be healthy and still get harmed.
Or you can be somebody who's genetically or biologically more susceptible than other
people and your risk is much greater.
So, the message is "buyer beware.
Patient beware."
Become educated about infectious diseases and vaccines and make the very best decision
that you can for yourself or your child before you get vaccinated.
TY: Hopefully this episode has given you a lot of information that's valuable when
you're making health decisions for you and for your family.
Thanks again for watching, and please tune in again for the next episode.
Join the movement, support the mission, save lives.
We're a small company that's dedicated to the truth and dedicated to helping humanity.
When you support our mission by owning the complete series today, you enable us to continue
to research, interview, expose, and share the truth absolutely free, just like we're
doing today.
If you've learned something today, you've been inspired, you want to help save lives,
or just love the way it makes you feel to support a good cause, please consider owning
"The Truth About Vaccines" today.
And as always, a portion of each and every sale is donated to charities that are doing
real research to help our kids be safer and healthier.
Simply click the banner below to join the movement and support the mission.
Thanks in advance.
[End of transcript]
The Truth About Vaccines
Episode 2
Transcribed by: http://trans-2.com
Page 38
For more infomation >> Magníficos 10 goles que han dejado los choques entre Cruz Azul y Atlas - Duration: 3:12. 
For more infomation >> खवा चॉकलेट मोदक | Khawa Chocolate Modak | Ganesh Chaturthi Special Recipe | MadhurasRecipe - Duration: 3:13. 
For more infomation >> VICTORY CONFERENCE | legendado - Duration: 7:41. 
For more infomation >> Bison offense shines in Great Falls High scrimmage - Duration: 0:48. 
For more infomation >> Renault Mégane Estate 1.5 DCI BOSE CRUISE CONTROL / NAVIGATIE / BLUETOOTH / TREKHAAK - Duration: 0:44. 
For more infomation >> Renault Scénic PRIVILEGE 1.6 16V - Duration: 0:51. 
For more infomation >> SILVERADO HD SETS GUINNESS WORLD RECORDS™ | World's Largest Flag Pulled by a Moving Vehicle - Duration: 0:56. 
For more infomation >> 8/18/17 5:10 PM (1026-1098 Pacific Hwy W, Dundee, OR 97115, USA) - Duration: 10:28. 
For more infomation >> Kia Rio 1.0 TGDI ComfortPlusLine Navigator Cruise Control, Airco, Nieuw! * - Duration: 0:53. 
For more infomation >> Jaguar F-Pace Prestige AWD 2.0d Automaat Panoramadak Xenon Led Camera 22 Inch - Duration: 0:54. 
For more infomation >> MINI 1.6 COOPER CHILI AUTOMAAT Airco - Duration: 0:54. 
For more infomation >> Volkswagen up! 1.0 MOVE UP! BLUEMOTION - Duration: 1:01. 
For more infomation >> 8/18/17 4:33 PM (21047-21263 Butteville Rd NE, Aurora, OR 97002, USA) - Duration: 0:08. 
For more infomation >> Volkswagen up! 1.0 MOVE UP! 60 PK - Duration: 1:01. 
For more infomation >> Chinese Parkour Performance - Duration: 10:32. 
For more infomation >> Ford Mondeo 2.0-16V FUTURA, AUTOMAAT CLIMA, CRUISE, TREKHAAK, ZEER COMPLEET! - Duration: 0:54. 
For more infomation >> Volkswagen Caddy 2.0 SDI rechterzijdeur - Duration: 0:59. 
For more infomation >> Oil Changes, Changed by Fu...
For more infomation >> Netflix-Serie "Marvel's The Defenders" Superhelden B-Seite - Duration: 6:09. 
For more infomation >> Toyota Yaris 1.0 VVT-I TREND (Trekhaak,Clima,Bluetooth,Lm velgen) - Duration: 0:44. 
For more infomation >> 面白い雑学！ガムはチョコレートと一緒に食べてはいけない？ - Duration: 2:28. 
For more infomation >> 9 utilisations étonnantes de l'aspirine dont vous n'avez jamais entendu parler ! - Duration: 3:18. 
For more infomation >> Beauté : 6 choses qui arrivent lorsque vous mettez des glaçons sur la peau - Duration: 5:46. 
For more infomation >> Back At Brietbart, Ousted Donald Trump Aide Steve Bannon Says 'Now I'm Free' | The 11th Hour | MSNBC - Duration: 11:42. 
For more infomation >> Mazda 2 1.3 GT-M LINE 5Drs | Dealer onderhouden | Airco | Cruise | Weinig KM - Duration: 0:54. 
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét