-------------------------------------------
RWBY Volume 5: Chapter 2 - Dread in the Air | Rooster Teeth - Duration: 20:43.
[RWBY Volume 5 Opening - Triumph]
Watts: Are we ready?
Watts: After you.
Lionheart: Your Grace, are... you there?
Salem: Hello, Leonardo.
Do you have something to report?
Lionheart: Of course, ma'am.
I would not waste your time, if not.
Watts: I'm still just so fascinated by this creature.
Cinder dear, are we coming through?
Can you see us clearly?
Well, as clearly as you can.
Cinder: Shut... up.
Watts: Oh goody, you've recovered.
Salem: Your report.
What is it?
Lionheart: I've...
I've found the Spring Maiden.
Salem: Is that so? Well done.
Arthur,
had I known how useful you'd be in expediting this process,
I would've sent you long, long ago.
As much as I'd love to take credit, ma'am,
I can't say that either of us are to thank for this development.
I guess you could say
a little birdie told us.
Salem: Explain.
Lionheart: You see, ma'am, Qrow Branwen arrived at Haven Academy earlier today
He believes Spring has taken residence with his sister's tribe.
Cinder: Is... the girl... with him?
Watts: Yes, Miss Rose was in attendance.
Salem: And you know of the tribe's location?
Lionheart: Yes ma'am! But you have to hurry!
Qrow is already at odds with my-
ah!
Salem: Leonardo,
do you remember the first time we met?
I remember. I remember your fear.
But, since that day, you've been extraordinarily brave.
I won't forget all that you've done for me.
Do not forget everything that I can do to you.
Salem: Cinder, you and your team will meet with Doctor Watts and together,
convince Raven Branwen that the survival of
her people depends on her cooperation.
Once you have Spring under control,
escort her to the Relic and contact Hazel.
The White Fang was promised the destruction of Haven,
and they'll have it once we have what we need.
Watts: Understood.
Salem: Not you, Arthur.
Tyrian's in need of a new tail.
Watts: What happened to his old one?
Cinder: Guess.
Watts: The silver-eyed girl?
Watts: It will be done.
Salem: Good.
Watts: Seems Qrow was right, Lionheart.
The students aren't pushovers.
Salem: You're free to speak your mind.
Cinder: I don't understand. Working with bandits?
Keeping Ruby alive? What's the point?
We're strong enough to take what we want by force!
Salem: Never underestimate the usefulness of others.
Take Leonardo;
he was one of Ozpin's most trusted, and yet now...
You will have the power I promised you,
when the time is right.
But remember that it comes with a cost.
If Ruby Rose has learned to harness her gift,
then you must take care to protect yours.
There's only so much I can do to aid you.
Salem: And Cinder, before you go,
Inform Tyrian...
that I wish to have a word with him.
Weiss: Where are we?
Pilot: Nowhere good.
Passing by some of Lake Matsu's floating islands.
The gravity Dust that forms in these things is giving us a little turbulence.
Nothing I can't handle,
but the islands sometimes hide some nasty Grimm.
I'm just betting on our friends in distress keeping them preoccupied.
Weiss: Look out!
Pilot: You've got to be kidding me!
Mistral Pilot: "By the gods, we've lost Percy! Help!"
Mistral Pilot: "We're hooked! We're hooked!"
Mistral Pilot: "Everyone, abandon ship!"
Pilot: Lancers, freakin' Lancers!
Alright buckle up- Huh?
Pilot: What are you doing?
Weiss: What we should've done in the first place!
You're carrying Dust, right?
Pilot: Officially, no.
Actually, yes.
Weiss: Then when I tell you, open the rear door!
Pilot: Better make it quick!
Pilot: Kid, we're cutting it close!
Weiss: Ready!
Pilot: Ha ha! Hold on!
Weiss: Ah!
What was that?!
Pilot: We're hooked!
Pilot: I got an idea! Hold on!
Literally!
Pilot: Ha ha!
Weiss: Can you find a pair of islands we can fit between?
Pilot: Kid, you are reading my mind!
Pilot: Yeah! Great going, kid!
We are in the clear!
Weiss: It's a Queen Lancer!
Pilot: What?!
Pilot: Do something!
(dab)
Pilot: I can see the shoreline!
Gods, we're not gonna make it!
♪ Shame that it took so long to rescue me ♪
♪ From the guilt you used to tie me to your family tree ♪
♪ I guess your training failed; ♪
♪ You're not in charge I'm free ♪
♪ Your patriarchal prison won't hold me ♪
♪ Now this conversation's finally over, ♪
Weiss: Pull up, now! ♪ Now this conversation's finally over, ♪
Weiss: Pull up, now! ♪ Mirror Mirror, now we're done ♪
♪ Mirror Mirror, now we're done ♪
♪ I've pulled myself together now ♪
♪ My mind and heart are one ♪
♪ Finally one ♪
♪ I'm not your pet ♪
♪ Not another thing you own ♪
♪ I was not born guilty of your crimes ♪
♪ Your riches and your influence can't hold me anymore ♪
♪ I won't be possessed ♪
♪ Burdened by your royal test ♪
♪ I will not surrender, ♪
♪ This life is mine~! ♪
Khan: Adam.
I'm not going to repeat myself,
so I want you to listen when I tell you
that the White Fang will not attack Haven Academy.
Adam: High Leader Khan, I am begging you
Khan: You should beg for forgiveness and nothing else!
The assault you led on Beacon was not the great victory you clearly think it was,
and you should be more grateful your punishment was not more severe.
You are a symbol for many in our organization,
but that doesn't make you infallible.
Adam: I was merely trying to follow your example, High Leader.
Khan: And what example might that be?
Adam: Strength.
Strength and unwavering conviction.
The humans have seen that strength now.
Khan: I was one of the first to suggest violence where violence was necessary.
Peace bred complacency and acceptance of our place in the world.
I will not allow humanity to push us down without pushing them back.
But the destruction of the Huntsman Academies crosses a line!
The loss of the CCT has brought global communication to a crawl!
And the White Fang is more of a target now than ever before!
You have justified humanity's campaign against us, and for what?
Empty promises from a group of humans?
Humans we still know nothing about,
and come and go as they please!
These are not examples of strength, Adam.
They are examples of your talents being diminished by shortsightedness!
Adam: If you want to know more about the humans,
then why not talk to one of them yourself?
Hazel!
Hazel: Took you long enough.
Khan: What is this?!
Hazel: Apologies.
I don't aim to cause any trouble.
Khan: You've brought a human to this location?
Adam: You should hear what he has to say.
Khan: This is grounds for execution!
Hazel: Ma'am, please.
Nobody needs to die today.
I'm just asking for a moment of your time.
Khan: The longer you stay here,
the less of a chance you have of leaving alive.
Hazel: I'll take those chances, if you don't mind.
You don't like me.
You have no reason to like me.
But you don't have to like me to get the results you want.
Khan: I'm starting to doubt either of you
fully comprehend what it is that I want.
I want humanity to fear the Faunus,
to know that we demand respect!
I do not want to start a war with the humans that we cannot win!
Adam: That's where you're wrong.
We can win a war against the humans.
Not only because we have the support of Hazel's master,
but because the Faunus are the dominant species of this planet.
We're better than humans.
We have everything humans have and more.
Humans shouldn't just fear the Faunus,
they should serve the Faunus.
Khan: I've had enough of this conversation for tonight.
Guards, take them away.
I said, take them away!
Adam: I will admit, Sienna,
you were right about my popularity.
My followers in Vale already see me as the true High Leader.
And many here in Mistral feel the same.
Hazel: What are you doing?
Adam: What's right for the Faunus.
From this day forward,
I will be the one to lead the White Fang.
Khan: If you think I'll just step aside
and follow beneath you, you're wrong-
Adam: I know.
Thank you, Sienna.
You were there when our people needed you,
but they need me now.
I'm sorry you couldn't see this through to the end.
Adam: Give our former leader a proper burial.
All who were here tonight
will claim that Sienna was murdered by a human Huntsman.
Sienna Khan will become a martyr for our cause,
her final act as High Leader.
Hazel: When were you planning on telling me about that?
Adam: This was my business, not yours.
Hazel: It's our business now,
and I don't appreciate you withholding things like that.
Adam: Your master was concerned with Sienna's willingness to cooperate.
Now she doesn't have to be.
Hazel: Nobody needed to die today.
Adam: I...
disagree.
Weiss: Help... please.
Bandit 1: What do you think?
Raven: I think...
we just hit the jackpot.
Subtitles by: Minh Huynh
-------------------------------------------
ApoRed und Leon Machère - YOUTUBE ASSI SONG [Cover] - Duration: 3:40.
For more infomation >> ApoRed und Leon Machère - YOUTUBE ASSI SONG [Cover] - Duration: 3:40. -------------------------------------------
The 15 best songs of birds in North Africa - Duration: 20:50.
The top 15 best songs of birds in North Africa
-------------------------------------------
Growtopia Lynxz 1.6 GT 2 .67 ( 64BIT ) 78 Hacks - Duration: 5:27.
For more infomation >> Growtopia Lynxz 1.6 GT 2 .67 ( 64BIT ) 78 Hacks - Duration: 5:27. -------------------------------------------
LetterSchool handwriting Cursive UpperCase Zaner Bloser letters A2Z multicolored apk for toddlers - Duration: 26:55.
LetterSchool handwriting Cursive UpperCase Zaner Bloser letters A2Z multicolored apk for toddlers
-------------------------------------------
Honda CR-V 2.0 AWD Elegance Automaat/Navigatie/Trekhaak - Duration: 0:43.
For more infomation >> Honda CR-V 2.0 AWD Elegance Automaat/Navigatie/Trekhaak - Duration: 0:43. -------------------------------------------
COLLABORATION SPECIAL HALLOWEEN organized by DOLLIGHTFUL - Duration: 16:03.
Hi everyone, this is Anastazia Custom speaking
and welcome on this special Halloween collaboration video
organized by Dollightful
With this video, I want to thanks her
because thanks to this opportunity
I was able to meet artists from other countries with various horizons
with a common passion for dolls and customization
I will now present the creations of my 10 partners
each one having a different Halloween vision
before showing you in details
the realisation steps of my own creation
We start with Dolligtful of course
Andreja from Nicolle's Dreams
Maria Lazar
GM Art
Hextian
Dolls Brand-New Look
Moonlight Jewel
Mozekyto
Patrick Custom
And finally Tamakyu
For my customization I choose to stay classic
So I went for a witch
in collaboration with the dressmaker Furyli
And here comes Luna Gladis Brok
The outfit and accessories
were entirely made by Furyli
Please note Luna Gladis Brok is in auction on Ebay for 3 days
so that the end of the auction
will timely be on Halloween evening
You'll find the action link in the video description
as well as the dessmaker Furyli Facebook page
and of course the Youtube channel of each partner
I hope you liked this video
Next week I'll show you a new DollZap'
Meanwhile, I wish you a very happy Halloween
and eat candies without restraint
Tchuss !!
-------------------------------------------
Empower the Journey (National Scholarships) - Duration: 1:04.
http://www.raceto36.org
http://www.raceto36.org
http://www.raceto36.org
-------------------------------------------
BEST BH7 (BUILDER HALL 7) BASE DESIGN WITH REPLAY PROOF | BH7 TOP TROLL TROPHY BASE |CLASH OF CLANS - Duration: 12:39.
BEST BH7 (BUILDER HALL 7) BASE DESIGN WITH REPLAY PROOF | BH7 TOP TROLL TROPHY BASE |CLASH OF CLANS
-------------------------------------------
Finger Family Halloween Song | Scary Nursery Rhymes | Slime Monster Song for Kids - Duration: 1:51.
Slime! Slime! Slime!
Daddy Finger
Where are you?
Here I am
How do you do?
Mommy Finger
Where are you?
Here I am
How do you do?
Brother Finger
Where are you?
Here I am
How do you do?
Sister Finger
Where are you?
Here I am
How do you do?
Baby Finger
Where are you?
Here I am
How do you do?
Slime! Slime! Slime!
Daddy Finger
Where are you?
Here I am
How do you do?
Mommy Finger
Where are you?
Here I am
How do you do?
Brother Finger
Where are you?
Here I am
How do you do?
Sister Finger
Where are you?
Here I am
How do you do?
Baby Finger
Where are you?
Here I am
How do you do?
SLIME!
-------------------------------------------
10 Uncomfortable Signs You're Actually Becoming The Person You're Supposed To Be - Duration: 5:50.
10 Uncomfortable Signs You're Actually Becoming The Person You're Supposed To Be
1.
You do everything by yourself and feel isolated from others.
The more mature you are, the more you can handle everything by yourself and it feels like you don't want to be anyone's
burden.
You've even always said, "I've got this," to those who are sincerely willing to help you.
More often than not, you feel lonely and isolated, but you feel proud of yourself on being strong and independent at
the same time.
2.
You realize that you have some issues with yourself.
You know exactly that you have issues to overcome; whether it's about your anxiety, mood swings, trust issues,
or her issues which disturb your well-being.
You will acknowledge when, how, and in what condition those issues will appear and you'll give your best efforts to
overcome them.
3.
You have a strong desire to cut off some unnecessary relationships.
As time goes by, you will feel that you have a lot of acquaintances, but few friends.
You begin to question your relationships with other people; you start to realize who's real and who's not,
who wants to stay or vice versa.
You'll feel disappointed, guilty, and sad towards losing some friends that you loved,
but you're brave enough to leave the relationships which were toxic and emotionally abused your inner self.
4.
It's hard for you to trust people.
Not only because you're being selective about your friends, but also because you won't easily buy people's bullshit.
You've been disappointed a lot of times by betrayals and broken promises; you know exactly how the real world works.
But, once you believe in some people, you will be loyal to them and you will do anything to maintain that relationship.
5.
You always feel that your life is boring.
It's hard for you to feel satisfied with your life; there's always something more you would like to achieve.
The same routines and work will bore you to death and you'll always be thinking,
"What's next?" which makes you always want to strive more.
Moreover, your life is "boring" because you have less unnecessary drama in your life- which is something to be proud of.
6.
You are too familiar with the feeling of sadness.
For you, life has no sugar coats; there are days when you feel hopeful,
but there are also times when you feel like you're at the lowest point of your life.
You are able to accept the broken hearts, failures, disappointment, and the feeling of sadness.
You acknowledge that life is not always about being happy.
But even though you feel the pain, you are able to bounce back again and realize that there were lessons from
everything that happened.
7.
You always feel like you're running out of time.
More often than not, you feel that 24 hours a day are not enough.
You barely have enough sleep and you always find yourself in busy situations.
It's a struggle for you to spare time for yourself and your loved ones.
There will always be something you have to do and sometimes you are too hard on yourself in doing things.
This means that you have a strong determination to be successful.
8.
You regret the mistakes you've made in the past.
It's easy for you to blame yourself for any mistakes that you made in the past.
You acknowledge that you've made some bad decisions and sometimes you want everything to go back to how it used to be.
But, you realize that regret will take you nowhere and the only thing that you can do is to not repeat the same
mistakes you've done.
9.
You always miss your childhood, family, and your loved ones.
Growing up sucks and you always find yourself looking back to your old life when everything was according to its place.
You live on your own and being separated with your family and loved ones is not easy at all.
But, deep down inside you don't want to give up; you're fully aware that all the struggles and success will be the best
gift for all the people that you love.
10.
You feel lost, confused, and anxious about your future.
You appear to be bold and strong, but most of the time you feel extremely insecure about your own life.
You've always questioned yourself regarding what you really need and what your life purpose is.
You don't exactly know how life supposed to be, simply because many unexpected things happen.
But, despite all the confusions and fears, you can manage yourself to always finish your responsibilities and work.
At the end of the day, you always take things one day at a time and you fully understand that everything will happen
according to your own time zone.
-------------------------------------------
Madurando con Murray | Hans-Hermann Hoppe - Duration: 57:19.
It is my great pleasure
to introduce one of the leading Rothbardian and a very faithful rothbardian
on this evening we're comrades in arms
we've known each other since 1985 we' ve together fought the good fight hopefully
for Austrian economics and libertarianism
The person that I'm introducing is a hero and that he is initiated his the property and freedom
society on his own and with the help of his lovely wife
Gulcin Imre and that this is certainly an politically incorrect
but a truth-telling organization that has no peer in the world.
and I'm course talking about Hans-Hermann Hoppe.
Hans was educated at the University of the Saarland University, Goethe University of Frankfurt
both in Germany,
and the University of Michigan for studies in philosophy, sociology, history and economics.
He earned his PhD in philosophy and his habilitation which
is an advanced degree even beyond a PhD in sociology and economics from Goethe University.
he taught at several german universities as well as
at the Johns Hopkins University Center for Advanced Studies in Bologna Italy
and is professor emeritus at the University of Nevada Las Vegas.
In 1986 he moved from Germany to the United States to study under Murray Rothbard
and remained a close associate of Rothbard until Murray's death in 1995
Dr. Hoppe is currently Distinguished Fellow of the Mises Institute
the only one who has achieved this recognition
he is former editor of the journal of libertarian studies
and is a lifelong member of the Royal Horticultural Society
I don't know where that came from.
Among his english-language books our Democracy the God that Failed, The Myth
of National Defense, Economic Science and the Austrian method,
The Economics and Ethics of Private Property, A Theory of Socialism and Capitalism,
The great fiction from democracy from aristocracy...excuse me to monarchy to
democracy and numerous articles on philosophy economics and the social sciences.
Best of all, all of these books and articles can be read
by people without a PhD in anything okay by regular people by real people
and I recommend that you dig into these works and you read them and
you will soon become addicted.
Hans in his lovely wife Dr. Guelcin Imre live in Istanbul.
So I introduced you Hans-Hermann Hoppe.
Thank You Joe for that nice introduction, thank you Mises Institute
Jeff Deist, Lew Rockwell, Bill Barnett for the honour to be the keynote speaker here.
I will not talk about horticulture even though I'm a member of the Royal Horticultural Society,
thanks to my wife who is an ardent gardener I'm just more spectator.
But my topic is coming of age with Murray.
I first met Murray Rothbard in the summer of 1985
I was in 35 years old and Murray was 59 and.
For the next 10 years until Murray's premature death in 1995, I would be associated with Murray
first in New York City and then in Las Vegas at UNLV in closer and more
immediate and direct contact than anyone else except his wife Joey, of course.
Being almost as old now as Murray was at the time of his death
I thought it appropriate to use this occasion
to speak and reflect a bit on what I learned during my ten years with Murray.
I was already an adult when I first met Murray,
not just in the biological but also in the mental and intellectual sense,
and yet, I only came of age while associated with him —
and I want to talk about this experience.
Before I met Murray I had already completed my Ph.D. and attained the rank of a Privatdozent
(that is a tenured but unpaid university professor),
the same rank incidentally that Ludwig von Mises once held in Vienna.
Apart from my doctoral dissertation ), I had already completed two books.
One, that revealed me as a Misesian,
and another, about to be published in the following year, year 1986 that revealed me as a Rothbardian.
I had already read all of Mises's and Rothbard's theoretical works.
(I had not yet read Murray's voluminous journalistic work,
which was essentially unavailable to me at the time in Germany.)
Thus, it was not my personal encounter with Murray, then, that made me a Misesian and Rothbardian.
Intellectually, I was already a Misesian and Rothbardian years before I ever met Murray personally.
And so, notwithstanding the fact that I am myself foremost a theoretician,
I do not want to speak here about the grand Austro-libertarian intellectual edifice
that Mises and, in his succession,
Rothbard have handed down to us, or about my own small contributions to this system,
but about my long personal experience with Murray:
about the practical and existential lessons
that I learned through my encounters with him and that turned me from an adult to a man who had come of age.
I moved to New York City, because I considered Murray the greatest of all social theorists,
at least in the 20th century if not of all times,
just as I considered Mises the greatest of all economists of all times
and, with Mises having long gone and out of the picture,
I wanted to meet, get to know and work with this man, Rothbard.
I still hold this view concerning the greatness of Mises and Rothbard.
Indeed, even more so today than 30 years ago.
And since then, there has been no second Mises or Rothbard.
Not even close, and we may have to wait for a long time for this to happen again.
So I moved to NYC knowing Murray's work, but knowing almost nothing about the man.
Remember, this was 1985.
I was still writing in longhand and then using a mechanical typewriter,
acquainting myself with a computer for the first time only during the following year at UNLV.
And Murray never used a computer but stayed with an electric typewriter until the end of his life.
There were no cell-phones, there were no emails, no internet, no Google, no Wikipedia, and no Youtube.
At the beginning, even fax-machines did not exist.
My correspondence with Murray preceding my arrival in NYC, then, was by old, regular snail-mail.
Murray expressed his enthusiasm about my wish to meet and work with him
and immediately offered to enlist the help of Burton Blumert, and indeed,
Burt then was of instrumental help in facilitating my move from Europe to the US.
(The wonderful Burt Blumert, owner of Camino Coins,
and also the founder of the original Center for Libertarian Studies
that would ultimately be integrated and merged with the Mises Institute,
Burton Blumert was one of Murray's dearest friends and confidants.
He was also a great benefactor and dear friend to me.)
I had seen some photos of Murray, I knew that he, like Mises,
was Jewish, that he taught at Brooklyn Polytechnic Institute
(subsequently renamed New York Polytechnic University and nowadays Polytechnic Institute of NYU),
that he was the editor of the much admired Journal of Libertarian Studies,
and that he was closely associated, as its academic director, with the Ludwig von Mises Institute
that Lew Rockwell had recently, 35 years ago, in 1982, founded.
That was about it.
And so, both unprepared, we met for the first time in Murray's university office.
Here was I, the 'cool blonde from the North,'
to cite a popular advertisement for bitter tasting northern German beers,
young, tall and athletic, somewhat unsociable, dry and with a dry sense of humor,
and more on the blunt, sarcastic and confrontational side.
So you might say I was perfect Wehrmacht-material, if you will.
And there was Murray: the 'big-city neurotic,' to use the German title of Woody Allen's comedic Annie Hall,
a generation older,
short and round, non-athletic, even clumsy (except for typing),
gregarious and hilarious, never moping but ever joyful, and, in his personal dealings
(quite unlike in his writings),
always non-confrontational, well-tempered or even tame.
Not exactly Wehrmacht-material.
Personality-wise, then, we could hardly have been more different.
Indeed, we were quite an odd couple — and yet, we hit it off from the start.
Given the long, special historical relationship between Germans and Jews,
I, as a young German meeting an older Jew in America,
had been afraid that this history might become a potential source of tension.
Not so. Quite to the contrary.
On the subject of religion itself, there was general agreement.
We were both agnostics, yet with a profound interest in the sociology of religion
and quite similar views on comparative religion.
Yet Murray greatly deepened my understanding of the role of religion in history
through his unfortunately uncompleted great work,
during the last decade of his life, on The History of Economic Thought.
Moreover, in our countless conversations, I learned from Murray about the importance
of complementing Austro-libertarian theory
with revisionist history in order to come up with a truly realistic assessment
of historic events and global affairs.
And it was I, then, as someone who had grown up in defeated and devastated post-WWII West-Germany
with the then (and still) 'official history'
taught across all German schools and universities of
(a) feeling guilty and ashamed of being German and German history
and (b) believing that America and America's democratic capitalism
was 'the greatest thing' since or even before the invention of sliced bread,
who had to revise his formerly still, despite all Austro-libertarian theory,
rather naïve views about world affairs in general and US-American and German history in particular.
As a matter of fact, Murray made me fundamentally change my rather rosy
view of the US and helped me, for the first time,
to feel consoled, content and even happy about being German,
and to develop a special concern for Germany and the fate of the German people.
To my initial surprise, then, — and ultimately my great and pleasant relief — Murray was quite a Germanophile.
He knew and highly appreciated the German contributions to philosophy,
mathematics, science, engineering, scholarly history and literature.
His beloved teacher Mises had originally written in German and was a product of German culture.
Murray loved German music, he loved German baroque churches,
he loved the Bavarian beer-garden atmosphere and the from-church-to-beer-garden-we-go tradition.
His wife Joey was of German ancestry, her maiden-name being JoAnn Schumacher,
and Joey was a member of the Richard-Wagner-Society, or societies, and a lifelong opera buff.
As well, most of Murray's friends that I would eventually meet turned out to be Germanophiles.
Foremost among them Ralph Raico, the great historian of classical liberalism,
who I had hoped to see again at this occasion but who sadly left us forever almost a year ago now.
I met Ralph only a few months after my arrival in NYC, at a party
at a party held at Murray's apartment on the upper Westside.
I immediately took to his caustic sarcasm and over the years we developed a close friendship.
Apart from our many meetings at various Mises Institute events,
I still fondly remember in particular our extended joint travels in northern Italy
and especially when, at a conference in Milano,
sponsored by some friends and affiliates of the once (but no longer) secessionist Lega Nord,
some self-proclaimed — who would have guessed that?!
"anti-fascist" demonstrators appeared in front of the conference hotel
to denounce us, to our great amusement,
as 'libertari-fascisti.'
Ralph was also the one who introduced me to the revisionist scholarship concerning WWI and WWII
as well as the entire interwar period, and it was Ralph,
who taught me about the history of German liberalism and in particular
its radical 19th century libertarian representatives that had been
almost completely forgotten in contemporary Germany.
Incidentally, Lew Rockwell, too, early on showed his Germanophile credentials.
when we first met in NYC in the fall of 1985, he drove a Mercedes 190,
he then went astray for a few years, driving an American-made pickup truck,
but ultimately returned to the fold by driving a Mini-Cooper, produced by BMW.
But above all it was Murray,
who taught me never to trust official history,
invariably written by the victors,
but to conduct all historical research instead like a detective investigating a crime.
always, first and foremost and as a first approximation, follow the money in search of a motive.
Who is to gain, whether in terms of money, real estate or sheer power from this measure or that?
In most cases, answering this question will lead you directly to the very actor or group of actors
responsible for the measure or policy under consideration.
Simple as it is to ask this question, however, it is much more difficult
and requires often arduous research to answer it,
and to unearth, from under a huge smokescreen of seemingly high-minded rhetoric
and pious propaganda, the hard facts and indicators
— the money flows and welfare-gains — to actually prove a crime and to identify and 'out' its perpetrators.
Murray was a master in this, and that at a time when you did not have access to computers,
the internet and search machines such as Google.
and to do this detective's work, as I learned from Murray,'prestigious' journals — in short:
you must go beyond official documents, the MSM, the big and famous names,
the academic 'stars' and the prestigious journals
— in short: everything and everyone deemed 'respectable' and 'politically correct.'
You must also, and in particular, pay attention to the work of outsiders,
extremists and outcasts, i.e., to 'disrespectable' or 'deplorable' people
and 'obscure' publication outlets
what you are supposed to ignore or not even know about.
To this day, I have heeded, and indeed relished following this advice.
Anyone who could see my list of bookmarks of frequently visited websites would likely be surprised,
and any establishmentarian or leftist in particular would likely be shocked and shudder in disgust.
With this general perspective and outlook on things,
revisionists such as Murray (and myself) are regularly charged,
contemptuously, as some nutty conspiracy theorists.
To this charge, Murray would typically respond:
First, put bluntly and sarcastically, even if one were a certified paranoid
this cannot be taken as proof that no one was actually after you and your money.
And second and more systematically:
Conspiracies are less likely, of course, the larger the number of supposed conspirators.
Also, it is naïve to assume the existence of just one big all-encompassing conspiracy
run by one all-powerful group of conspirators.
But conspiracies, often rival or even contradictory conspiracies, i.e.,
confidential efforts of various groups of people acting in concert
in the pursuit of some common goal, are indeed an ever-present feature of social reality.
As any action, such conspiracies can succeed or they can fail
and can lead to consequences that were un-intended by the conspirators.
But realistically speaking, most if not all historical events
are more or less exactly what some identifiable people or group of people acting in concert
intended them to be.
Indeed, to assume the opposite is to assume, incredibly,
that history is nothing but a sequence of unintelligible events and accidents.
Moreover, in learning from Murray about the necessity of complementing
Austro-libertarian theory with revisionist history so as to gain a complete,
realistic picture of the world and worldly affairs,
I also received constant training from him in the art of prudent and judicious judgment and evaluation of people,
and judicious judgment and evaluation of people, actions and events.
Pure theory allows us to make rather clear-cut judgments of true or false, right or wrong,
and effective, leading to the goal intended, or ineffective.
But many if not most actions and events
provoking or eliciting our judgments do not fall into the category of matters
that can be thusly evaluated.
We are surrounded, or better: encircled, by a class of people — politicians and state-agents —
that, day-in and day-out, renders and enforces decisions
that systematically impact and affect our property
and consequently our entire conduct of life
without our consent and against our explicit protestation.
We are confronted by an elite of rulers,
And confronted with politicians and political decisions, then,
our judgment concerns the evaluation of, at best, second-bests.
The question is not true or false, right or wrong, effective or ineffective.
Rather, it is this:
Given that political decisions are per se false, wrong and ineffective,
which of these decisions is less false, wrong and effective
and comparatively closer to the truth, the right and the good,
and which person represents a lesser evil or a greater one than another.
Such questions do not allow for a scientific answer,
because answering them involves the comparative evaluation
of countless immeasurable and incommensurable variables.
And in any case, newly discovered facts about the past or future developments
may well reveal any such judgment as mistaken.
But the answer is also not arbitrary.
What is true, right and effective is given, as fix-points, and reasons must be supplied,
whether based on logic or empirical evidence,
for locating various second-bests as closer or more distant to such points.
Rather, judgment-making in matters such as these is a difficult art,
much like entrepreneurship is not a science but an art.
And just as some people are good at entrepreneurship and others bad,
indicated by monetary profits or losses,
so are some people good at judging political events and actors and others bad
gaining or losing in the reputation as wise and prudent judges.
Murray was of course not unfailing in his judgments
During the late 1960's and early 1970's, for instance,
he misjudged the anti-war stand of the New Left as more principled than it really was,
something that he afterwards readily admitted as a mistake.
And I know of at least one, rather personal case,
where Joey's judgment was better and more on the mark than his.
This notwithstanding, I have not encountered anyone of sounder, subsequently vindicated judgment than Murray.
With this I want to come to the second major lesson I learned during my long association with Murray.
While the first lesson in revisionism
concerned matters of practice and method, the second lesson concerned existential matters.
Before I met Murray, I knew of course that he was a radical outsider
in a predominantly leftist-liberal academia
and I expected (and was willing to accept for myself) that this would involve some sacrifices,
i.e., that one would have to pay a price for being a Rothbardian,
not only, but also in terms of money.
But I was quite surprised to realize how high this price was.
I knew that Brooklyn Polytechnic was not a prestigious university,
yet I expected Murray to occupy there a comfortable, well-paying post.
Moreover, at the time I still fancied the US as a bastion and bulwark of free enterprise
and consequently expected that Murray,l
as the foremost intellectual champion of capitalism
and the personified anti-thesis to Marx, would be held in high esteem,
if not in academia then certainly outside of it,
in the world of commerce and business, and accordingly be rewarded
with a certain degree of affluence.
In fact, at Brooklyn Polytechnic Murray occupied a small, grungy and windowless office
that he had to share with a history professor.
In Germany, even research assistants enjoyed more comfortable surroundings, not to speak of full professors.
Murray ranked among the lowest paid full professors at his school.
Indeed, my German National Science Foundation grant at the time — a Heisenberg scholarship —
turned out to be considerably higher than Murray's university salary
(something that I was too ashamed to reveal to him after I had discovered it).
And Murray's apartment in Manhattan, large and filled to the ceiling with books, was dark and run-down.
Certainly nothing like the penthouse that I had imagined him to occupy.
This situation improved significantly with his move in 1986, at age 60, to Las Vegas and UNLV.
While my salary went down there as compared to my previous compensation, Murray's went sharply up,
but was still below 100K,
and he could afford to buy a roomy but spartan house.
Even as the holder of an endowed chair at UNLV, however,
Murray did not have command of any research assistants or a personal secretary.
Yet Murray never complained or showed any bitterness or signs of envy
but always plugged along joyfully and pushed ahead instead with his writings.
This was a hard lesson for me to learn and I am still having difficulties following it at times.
A propos, Joey and Murray once told me laughingly how, at the time when they were still dating,
Both had expected the other to be a good catch.
Joey, because Murray was Jewish, and Murray, because Joey was gentile
— only to then find out that they were both wrong in their expectations.
Moreover, despite his towering achievements as an intellectual champion of free market capitalism,
Murray never won any prizes, awards or honors to speak of.
That he did not win a Nobel prize in economics was not surprising.
After all, the great Mises also did not win it.
But in the US alone there existed dozens of institutions —think-tanks, foundations,
business associations, research centers and universities —
that professed their dedication to free markets and liberty,
and yet none of them ever awarded Murray any significant prize or honorary award,
all the while they showered people with money and awards
who had done little more than to suggest — "daringly" — some incremental reform such as, let's say,
lowering the marginal tax rate from 35% to 30
or cutting the budget of the EPA by some percentage points, or who had simply expressed
their "personal love" of "freedom" and "free enterprise" often, loudly and emphatically enough.
None of this fazed Murray in the slightest.
Indeed, he expected nothing else, for reasons that I still had to learn.
What Murray realized and I still had to learn was that the most vociferous and ferocious rejection and opposition
to Austro-libertarianism would not come from the traditional socialist Left,
but rather from these very self-proclaimed "anti-socialist," "limited government,"
"minimal state," "pro-private enterprise" and "pro-freedom" outfits and their intellectual mouthpieces,
and above all from what has become known as the Beltway-Libertarians.
They simply could not stomach the fact that Murray had demonstrated with plain logic
that their doctrines were nothing but inconsistent intellectual clap-trap,
and that they were all, to use Mises's verdict vis-a-vis Milton Friedman and his company,
a "bunch of socialists,"
socialists notwithstanding their vehement protestations to the contrary.
For, as Murray argued, once you admitted the existence of a State, any State,
defined as a territorial monopolist of ultimate decision making in every case of conflict,
including conflicts involving the State itself,
then all private property had been effectively abolished,
even if it remained provisionally, qua State-grant, nominally private,
and had been replaced instead by a system of "collective" or rather State-property.
State, any State, means socialism, defined as "the collective ownership of factors of production."
The institution of a State is praxeologically incompatible
with private property and private property based enterprise.
It is the very anti-thesis of private property, and any proponent of private property
and private enterprise then must, as a matter of logic, be an anarchist.
In this regard (as in many others) Murray was unwilling to compromise,
or "intransigent," as his detractors would say.
Because in theory, in thinking, compromise is impermissible.
In everyday life, compromise is a permanent, and ubiquitous feature, of course.
But in theory, compromise is the ultimate sin, a strict and absolute 'no no.' It is not permissible, for instance,
to compromise between the two incompatible propositions that 1+1=2
or that 1+1=3 and accept that it is 2.5.
Either some proposition is true or it is false. There can be no "meeting in the middle" of truth and falsehood.
Here, regarding Murray's uncompromising radicalism,
a little anecdote told by Ralph Raico seems apropos.
To quote Ralph:
Murray was someone special. I recognized that fact the first night I met him.
It was after the Mises seminar;
a buddy of mine and I had been invited to attend, and afterwards Murray suggested we have coffee and talk.
My friend and I were dazzled by the great Mises, and Murray, naturally, was pleased to see our enthusiasm.
He assured us that Mises was at least the greatest economist of the century,
if not the whole history of economic thought.
As far as politics went, though, Murray said, lowering his voice conspiratorially:
"Well, when it comes to politics, some of us consider Mises a member of the non-Communist Left."
and Ralph concludes this by saying: "Yes, it was easy to see we'd met someone very special."
Unlike Murray, quite a few individuals who had learned essentially everything they ever knew from Murray,
in particular his Man, Economy and State,
quite few people were willing to make such intellectual compromises
and they were richly rewarded for their intellectual "flexibility" and "tolerance." But that was not Murray!
And consequently, he was (and still is) ignored, excluded or denounced by the chieftains
of the "limited-government-free-market-industry."
And he was essentially left without any institutional support,
as a lone fighter, until the arrival of Lew Rockwell and the Mises Institute.
I experienced this Rothbard-phobia second-handedly, if you will.
For as soon as word had gotten out that the new German arrival was Murray's boy
and also appeared rather "intransigent,"
I found myself immediately placed on the same blacklists with him.
Thus, I had quickly learned a first important real-life lesson of what it means to be a Rothbardian.
Another lesson was in humility.
Joe Salerno talked about that love it, I have to add a few things
Murray had a huge library,
and read and digested an enormous amount of literature and was consequently a humble man.
He was always reluctant and highly skeptical to assume or recognize any "originality" claims.
"Originality" claims, he knew, are made most frequently by people with tiny libraries and little reading.
In distinct contrast, Murray was highly generous in giving credit to others.
And he was equally generous in giving advice to anyone asking.
Indeed, on almost any conceivable subject, he was prepared,
off the top of his head, to provide you with an extensive bibliography.
As well, he encouraged any sign of productivity even among his lowliest students.
While I always tried to follow this example,
I could not bring myself to go quite as far as Murray did.
Because I thought and still think that Murray's humility was excessive, that he was humble almost to a fault.
His students at Brooklyn Polytechnic, for instance,
mostly engineering majors (or, as Murray described Mises's students at NYU, "packaging majors"),
had no idea who he was, because he never mentioned his own works.
They were genuinely surprised to find out from me who their jolly professor was
when I substituted teaching Murray's class while he was out of town.
And at UNLV the situation was not much different.
While I actively promoted him as his unofficial PR-agent, Murray continued in his self-deprecation.
Although he had written on almost any imaginable subject in the social sciences,
he would, when he suggested or assigned term-papers to his students,
mention his own related writings, if at all, only as some sort of afterthought or upon specific request.
Yet Murray's extreme modesty had also another, unfortunate effect.
When we moved to Las Vegas in 1986, we had expected to turn UNLV into a bastion of Austrian economics.
At the time, UNLV's basketball team, the Runnin' Rebels,
under coach Jerry Tarkanian, were a national powerhouse,
always slightly scandalous, but impossible to overlook.
We had hoped to become the Runnin' Rebels of economics at UNLV.
Several students had transferred and enrolled at the university in anticipation of such a development.
But these hopes were quickly disappointed.
Already at our arrival at UNLV the composition of the economics department
had significantly changed, and then majority rule, democracy, set in.
To balance the Austrian influence, only one year later,
the department majority decided, against our opposition, to hire a no-name Marxist.
I urged Murray to use his position and reputation
to interfere with the university's higher-ups and prevent this appointment.
Except for Jerry Tarkanian, Murray was the only nationally recognized person at UNLV.
He held the only endowed chair at the university.
We knew the university's president and provost socially and were on cordial terms with both of them.
Accordingly, I believed that there was a realistic chance to overturn the department's decision.
But I could not persuade Murray of his own powers.
After this missed opportunity matters became worse.
The department continued to hire anyone but an Austrian or Austrian sympathizer.
Our students were mal-treated and discriminated against.
The department and the dean of the business college denied me tenure
(which decision was overruled by the university's provost and president,
not least because of massive student protests and the intervention of several university donors).
The department chairman wrote an outrageous, nasty
and insulting annual evaluation of Murray's professorial performance
(upon which the university administration forced the chairman to resign from his position).
As a consequence, a second chance for us arose to turn matters around.
Plans were developed and were discussed with the provost
to split the department and establish a separate economics department in the College of Liberal Arts.
This time Murray became involved.
But the initial momentum to our advantage had been lost in the meantime,
and after the first signs of resistance,
Murray quickly resigned and gave up.
He was not willing to take off his gloves, and our secessionist project soon fizzled out in defeat.
Only to quickly finish our UNLV saga: After Murray's death in 1995,
I continued working at UNLV for another decade
in an increasingly hostile environment.
The once protective university administration had changed,
and I felt ever more unappreciated and out of place.
Even my great popularity among students was used against me,
as proof of the great "danger" emanating from my teaching.
In 2004, I became embroiled in a scandal.
In a lecture I had hypothetically suggested that homosexuals, on average,
and owing to their characteristic lack of children,
had a comparatively higher degree of time-preference, i.e., of present-orientation.
A cry-baby student complained,
and the university's affirmative action commissar immediately,
as if he had only waited for this opportunity, initiated official proceedings against me,
threatening severe punitive measures if I were not to instantly and publicly recant and apologize.
"Intransigent" as I was, I refused to do so.
And I am certain that it was only this steadfast refusal of mine to beg for forgiveness that,
after a full year of administrative harassment,
I ultimately emerged victorious from this battle with the sought police
and the university administration suffered an embarrassing defeat.
A year later I resigned from my position and left UNLV and the US for good.
Coming back to Murray:
Naturally, I was disappointed about the developments at UNLV.
But they did not have the slightest effect on our continued cooperation.
Maybe Murray had been right and more realistic all along and it was I, who had suffered from too much youthful optimism?
Who knows?
And in any case, there was one more important lesson about the larger scheme of things that I still had to learn.
Whereas most people tend to become milder and more 'tolerant'
in their views as they grow older, Murray grew increasingly more radical and less tolerant over time.
Not in his personal dealings, as I already emphasized.
In this regard Murray was and remained to the end a 'softie,' but in his speeches and writings.
This radicalization and increasing 'intransigence' came in response
to developments in the world of US-politics at large
in the limited government free market industry and among the so called
libertarians assembled around Washington D.C.'s Beltway.
There, everywhere, a slow yet systematic drift toward the Left and leftist ideas could be observed.
A drift that ever since, up to this day, has only further gained in momentum and grown in strength.
Constantly, new "rights" were 'discovered' and adopted in particular also by so-called libertarians.
"Human rights" and "civil rights," "women rights" and "gay rights,"
the "right" not to be discriminated against, the "right" to free and unrestricted immigration,
the "right" to a free lunch and free health care, and the "right" to be free of unpleasant speech and thought.
Murray demolished all this allegedly "humanitarian" or, to use a German term, this "Gutmenschen" talk
as intellectual rubbish in demonstrating that none of these supposed "rights"
were compatible with private property rights.
And that, as libertarians above all people should know, only private property rights, i.e.,
the right of every person in the ownership of his physical body
and the ownership of all external objects justly (peacefully) acquired by him,
can be argumentatively defended as universal and com-possible human rights.
Everything except private property rights, then, Murray demonstrated again and again,
are phony, non-universalizable rights.
Every call for "human rights" other than private property rights
is ultimately motivated by egalitarianism and as such represents
a revolt against nature.
Moreover, Murray moved still further to the right — in accordance with Erik von Kuehneldt-Leddihn's dictum
that "the right is right" and the left is wrong.
— in pointing out that in order to establish, maintain and defend a libertarian social order
more is needed than the mere adherence to the non-aggression principle.
The ideal of the left- or "modal"-libertarians, as Murray referred to them,
of "live and let live as long as you don't aggress against anyone else,"
that sounds so appealing to adolescents in rebellion against parental authority and any social convention and control,
may be sufficient for people living far apart
and dealing and trading with each other only indirectly and from afar.
But it is decidedly insufficient when it comes to people living in close proximity
to each other, as neighbors and cohabitants of the same community.
The peaceful cohabitation of neighbors and of people in regular direct contact with each other on some territory
requires also a commonality of culture: of language, religion, custom and convention.
There can be peaceful co-existence of different cultures on distant, physically separated territories,
but multi-culturalism,
cultural heterogeneity, cannot exist in one and the same place and territory
without leading to diminishing social trust,
increased conflict, and ultimately the destruction of anything resembling a libertarian social order.
If Murray had been ignored, neglected or resented before by the usual suspects,
now, with this stand against everything deemed "politically correct,"
he was vilified and met with undisguised hatred.
The by now only all-too-familiar litany of denunciatory terms followed:
Murray was a reactionary, a racist, a sexist, an authoritarian,
an elitist, a xenophobe, a fascist and, to top it all off, a self-hating Jewish Nazi.
Murray shrugged it all off. Indeed, he laughed about it.
And indeed, to the consternation of the "smear bund,"
as Murray referred to the united popular front of his "anti-fascist" detractors,
his influence only grew and has continued to grow still further since his death.
It may not be widely recognized, but without Murray there would be no Ron Paul as we know him
— and I say this without wishing thereby to diminish or belittle Ron Paul's own, personal role
and extraordinary achievements in the slightest —,
there would be no Ron Paul movement, and there would be no popular or,
as the "smear bund" prefers to say, no "populist" libertarian agenda.
As for me, my own views radicalized, too, along with Murray's.
My Democracy: The God That Failed was the first major documentation of this intellectual development,
and if anything, my radical intolerance regarding anything left-libertarian
and "politically correct" has been growing still ever since.
Almost needless to say that I, too, then have been awarded the same and even a few extra honorary titles by the "smear bund" as Murray
(except for the self-hating Jewish stuff).
Yet I had learned to shrug all of it off, too,
as I had seen Murray do it,
and as Ralph Raico had always encouraged and continued to advise me.
In addition, remembering a popular German saying helped me: "viel Feind, viel Ehr'."
"Many enemy, much honor."
And indeed, the ongoing success of my annual Property and Freedom Society which is now in its 12th year,
held and conducted in a genuinely Rothbardian spirit,
has demonstrated the utter failure of all defamation campaigns directed at me.
If anything, they have helped rather than hindered me
in attracting an ever larger circle of intellectual friends, affiliates and supporters.
I should add that during the last decade or so, under the wise and strict guidance of my lovely wife Gülçin,
I have also made some strides in combining uncompromising intellectual radicalism
with certain degree of personal lovability,
even though I must admit that nature and natural dispositions have prevented me
from coming anywhere close to Murray in this regard.
I have said far too little here about Lew, and I apologize.
But this I must say: Apart from Murray Lew has played a tremendously important role
helping me become the man that I am today.
And to Murray, who I am sure is watching us today from up high, I say:
thank you Murray, you are my hero,
"I shall not look upon his like again,"
and I hope you are happy with your student.
I always felt tremendous joy when you told me "great Hans, Attaboy,"
and even if I can't hear you right now, nothing would give me greater pleasure
than if you said it again right now up there, where the kings of thought are gathered.
Thank you very much.
-------------------------------------------
Halloween Special Freddy Krueger Custom OOAK doll - Duration: 14:05.
For more infomation >> Halloween Special Freddy Krueger Custom OOAK doll - Duration: 14:05. -------------------------------------------
[FREE] Hard Slow Hip Hop Beat Rap Instrumental 2017 #150 | Free Beats By MR. HODEN ► - Duration: 3:52.
WANNA BUY THIS BEAT? CONTACT ME ON FACEBOOK OR GMAIL!
-------------------------------------------
[ENG] [PR Video] The Unit (더 유닛): GOOD DAY Viva - Duration: 1:43.
[SEVENTEEN song] ♪ Mansae mansae mansae yeh ♪
♪ Mansae mansae mansae yeh ♪
Korea Mansae (Horray/Long live)!
The Unit Mansae!
And the viewers watching me right now, Mansae!
Hello!
Debuted 2017.08.31
the new rookies GOOD DAY's Mansae, Viva here!
My name Viva means Mansae
I chose it in the hopes that everyone who watches me will shout Mansae!
I have the position of Main Dancer in GOOD DAY
That's why I'll be showing you my dancing
Music cue!
Here I go!
The song is too-
Everyone, together!
Please show GOOD DAY a lot of love and look upon Viva prettily! Bye!
-------------------------------------------
FLAMENGO X V2SCO RUEDA E SEU MISTÉRIO!GLOBO ESPORTE 28/10/17 - Duration: 1:37.
For more infomation >> FLAMENGO X V2SCO RUEDA E SEU MISTÉRIO!GLOBO ESPORTE 28/10/17 - Duration: 1:37. -------------------------------------------
Nike Classic Cortez Women's 'Oregon' - THE ON-FOOT SNEAKER LOOK WITH SJ - Duration: 2:05.
hey YouTube point stuff fans today we're gonna look at my Nike Cortez in the
Oregon colorway on feet. Let's roll.
Hey YouTube so that was the the Nike Cortez Oregon colorway on feet
these are super strokey it started to rain slightly so I kind of want to
get indoors and get them off my feet but hopefully that gave you a feel for the
shoe these are really nice they're quite springy as I said not a great deal of
support rounds at the heel so i may have been wobbling a bit more in the old on feet but I
hope you enjoyed that and hopefully we'll see you on Streaming Sunday don't
forget if not subscribe see our next video over and out
the dog is being really good today. Shall i call him over.
Shall we see the dog. Huxley.
Come here. Yeah. Come here.
Say Hello. Say hi Pint of Stuff fans. Hello .... <giggle>
-------------------------------------------
Réaction au Season 2 Premiere de Stranger Things (Spoilers) - Duration: 5:17.
soon
-------------------------------------------
Un extraño fenómeno ha sido detectado en Argentina durante una tormenta - Duration: 1:35.
For more infomation >> Un extraño fenómeno ha sido detectado en Argentina durante una tormenta - Duration: 1:35. -------------------------------------------
Nike Classic Cortez Women's 'Oregon' - THE ON-FOOT SNEAKER LOOK WITH SJ - Duration: 2:05.hey YouTube point stuff fans today we're gonna look at my Nike Cortez in the
Oregon colorway on feet. Let's roll.
Hey YouTube so that was the the Nike Cortez Oregon colorway on feet
these are super strokey it started to rain slightly so I kind of want to
get indoors and get them off my feet but hopefully that gave you a feel for the
shoe these are really nice they're quite springy as I said not a great deal of
support rounds at the heel so i may have been wobbling a bit more in the old on feet but I
hope you enjoyed that and hopefully we'll see you on Streaming Sunday don't
forget if not subscribe see our next video over and out
the dog is being really good today. Shall i call him over.
Shall we see the dog. Huxley.
Come here. Yeah. Come here.
Say Hello. Say hi Pint of Stuff fans. Hello .... <giggle>
-------------------------------------------
Réaction au Season 2 Premiere de Stranger Things (Spoilers) - Duration: 5:17.soon
-------------------------------------------
For more infomation >> Réaction au Season 2 Premiere de Stranger Things (Spoilers) - Duration: 5:17.-------------------------------------------
The Loud Republic ‒ Hillside - Duration: 3:48.
The Loud Republic ‒ Hillside
-------------------------------------------
For more infomation >> The Loud Republic ‒ Hillside - Duration: 3:48.-------------------------------------------
NEIL YOUNG - Live: Music Hall | Cincinnati (1970) - Bootleg Radio (HD) - Duration: 1:25:48.
Enjoy the music and feel free to Subscribe!
-------------------------------------------
For more infomation >> NEIL YOUNG - Live: Music Hall | Cincinnati (1970) - Bootleg Radio (HD) - Duration: 1:25:48.-------------------------------------------
8 choses géniales qui arrivent à votre corps lorsque vous arrêtez de porter des soutiens-gorge - Duration: 4:06.
For more infomation >> 8 choses géniales qui arrivent à votre corps lorsque vous arrêtez de porter des soutiens-gorge - Duration: 4:06. -------------------------------------------
For more infomation >> 8 choses géniales qui arrivent à votre corps lorsque vous arrêtez de porter des soutiens-gorge - Duration: 4:06.-------------------------------------------
L'amour est dans le pré, Thierry Olive en colère contre les agriculteurs qui abandonnent - Duration: 3:03.
For more infomation >> L'amour est dans le pré, Thierry Olive en colère contre les agriculteurs qui abandonnent - Duration: 3:03. -------------------------------------------
For more infomation >> L'amour est dans le pré, Thierry Olive en colère contre les agriculteurs qui abandonnent - Duration: 3:03.-------------------------------------------
DIT IS ZO ZAAAAAAACHT | unboxing - Duration: 3:48.
For more infomation >> DIT IS ZO ZAAAAAAACHT | unboxing - Duration: 3:48. -------------------------------------------
For more infomation >> DIT IS ZO ZAAAAAAACHT | unboxing - Duration: 3:48.-------------------------------------------
Exercises for a Baby with Low Tone #11: Practicing Hands and Knees - Duration: 1:38.
Hello!
My name is Amy Sturkey.
I am a pediatric physical therapist.
I am here with my friend, Myla, who is my co-instructor.
She helps/specializes in teaching how to treat children with low tone.
There you go.
In the last video, I mentioned that her legs were going wild.
So, I did a minor modification with my legs.
I tucked one of my legs in a little further than the other leg.
With that I have been able to get her on her hands and knees.
I've got her hands underneath her shoulders.
So, she is in kind of a hands and knees-ish position.
Oh goodness.
She says, "I don't know about all of this.
This is hard."
Uh-huh.
There you go.
You are doing just fine.
So I am working on hands and knees and rocking this time.
Rock her forward and back and side to side.
If I had a toy in front of us, it would encourage more head up behavior.
Ok, ok, ok.
We got it.
Myla says, "That is enough of that!"
Heavens to Betsies.
That is it.
Another simple idea of working on developmental ideas for a child with low tone.
Thanks a lot.
Bye-bye.
Hi!
You sticking your tongue out at me?
Yes?
Blah!
(Laughter)
-------------------------------------------
For more infomation >> Exercises for a Baby with Low Tone #11: Practicing Hands and Knees - Duration: 1:38.-------------------------------------------
Origami snowflake from paper. Christmas decoration on New year 2018 - Duration: 2:41.
For more infomation >> Origami snowflake from paper. Christmas decoration on New year 2018 - Duration: 2:41. -------------------------------------------
For more infomation >> Origami snowflake from paper. Christmas decoration on New year 2018 - Duration: 2:41.-------------------------------------------
Naruto Shippuden Set 32
For more infomation >> Naruto Shippuden Set 32-------------------------------------------
Doing your Dares - Duration: 8:41.
What is going on guys I'm back with another video
Today I'm going to be doing your guys dares
And if your like damn I wish I wrote dares but don't worry there will be dares number 2
Don't forget to comment in this video or in my Instagram (Lara Janahi)
So before I start the video don't forget to follow my Instagram my Twitter and add me on snapchat
And subscribe subscribe and like and yeah, this is the Tanner Braungardt Hoody, Allot of people are saying this is Jake paul merch but it not
anyways let go to Instagram
So I told you guys
To tell me dares in this one but it didn't get allot of comments it got 8
And I did another one
So ya guys let go!
Okay first I dare you to dare me something I
Dare you to create a dance and teach it to all of your sibling
I'm not going to show my siblings because they don't want to be in youtube
Dare it eat ketchup with ice hell. No. Yeah, okay, okay, okay?
Ketchup ice do that
Actually tastes a lot more, I guess reason why I said the pictures because oh
No, I dare you to show us your most embarrassing photo
How selected this is my first time seeing the Eiffel Tower, and I was like oh my god, so nice
And I like repeat a picture of me. This is so embarrassing
I dare you to stop tagging time all right. I dare you to do
No I
Dare you to take and I took it and throw it to every siblings video
I'm just telling you don't have any chips I can throw Tommy
Hi guys. I sent to the go-go and I changed because I don't want my fucking to be
wet
- I am SuperDuper duper wet I
Dare you to eat spoonful of ketchup
My god, I ordered food from outside, and I got ketchup so I was Tama dared me to it was full of ketchup
I'm gonna do it right now
Oh
Peace out guys Oh a little bit
I
Dare you to tell Fathead. We have a signed test tomorrow. Can I borrow your book then tell him thanks?
I'll go through to the toilet
he's
somewhere so enough to be
Doubly frigid Spooner from the roof into the pool. I would I wouldn't look at the comment
I was throwing for the spinner off the roof actually I'm gonna throw it to the pool as he said so yeah
We didn't leave it over there until I swim
I'm gonna miss you boy say I guys I'm gonna make like this little montage
before I drop the biggest winner
Tickets and Hoth's right now. I am going to drop the fidgets better
This is really hard they said please set
Okay, I'm doing it. I don't eat lemon salt or me. Oh I did that ones I didn't like it
Alright guys the last one. I know this video is short guys. Just I'm just gonna be the world I
Dare you to commit suicide
I'm going to jump from
I'm not going to show you guys a
running sky I
Love I need to set the end is somewhere
Okay fine
Guys I'm just gonna show you my tour of my bed like my room
This is my bed
Every single time or SMO STUV the time there are insects
in this
Area not my sister. I have no clue. Why okay? I have no clue
So this is my light my nightlight. It's a kind of broken because it sometimes glitch
But since it's turn up turn up turn on turn off whatever. I can't on
And there's my setup guys the green screen is my setup for my videos
But you know how to take it down
Yeah
No
Guys it's got getting 30% because I'm always stuck at Ricky 23 or 22 or
guys
If you didn't see my birthday video go check it out
Like birthday subscribe
Picture it picture it picture in English can picture it picture it picture it
Snapchatters can scan your snap god to add you as friend
The video ended well come on want to take tell you called story
Thank you guys watch this video
Don't forget to smash the like button subscribe if you're new and don't forget for all my social media
It's gonna be in the link in description below over here if it's over here that means
I'm not lazy, and if it's not here
I am so lazy to do that because it's like hard kinda say guys think you can watch this video
Smash the like button subscribing. You know see you guys in the next video peace out bye
-------------------------------------------
REJOIGNEZ MON SERVEUR DISCORD ! Raze Team 💻 - Duration: 1:30.
For more infomation >> REJOIGNEZ MON SERVEUR DISCORD ! Raze Team 💻 - Duration: 1:30. -------------------------------------------
Audi A3 Cabriolet 1.4 TFSI 150PK S-LINE EDITION LEER - Duration: 0:59.
For more infomation >> Audi A3 Cabriolet 1.4 TFSI 150PK S-LINE EDITION LEER - Duration: 0:59. -------------------------------------------
Trump Supporter Says In Lawsuit His MAGA Hat Is "Religious Symbol" - Duration: 5:16.
When most people think of religious symbols, we think of the Star of David, a cross, or
something like that, but according to some Republicans one of the most prominent spiritual
religious symbols here in the United States is that Make America Great Again red hat that
many of them have been sporting since the campaign of Donald Trump.
In fact, a lawsuit filed by a Philadelphia accountant, claims that his Make America Great
Again hat is in fact a religious symbol.
The suit arose over the fact that the man was wearing his MAGA hat in a bar in New York
City, and no, this is not a Ron White joke.
He was wearing the hat inside a bar in New York City where he was promptly kicked out
for wearing the hat.
I don't know necessarily the specifics, perhaps the owners of the bar did not like Donald
Trump, perhaps they viewed the hat more as a symbol of hate and oppression and so they
kicked the man out because he would not remove the hat, and now we have a lawsuit.
The lawyer for this accountant is claiming that his client's religious freedom was violated
because he was removed for wearing the MAGA hat.
Here is specifically, part of the argument that they're trying to make here.
It was pointed to previous instances where court has acknowledged the rights of parents
who refused to vaccinate their children because of their faith, that's one of the arguments
the lawyers made.
Wearing a MAGA hat and getting kicked out of a bar is apparently on par with parents
who do not vaccinate their children.
That doesn't make it a good fucking idea!
It's still pretty stupid at that point, and to compare a MAGA hat to unvaccinated kids,
I would say that's actually kind of spot on.
You're both dangerous to society here.
They also argued that the MAGA hat is an expression of closely held spiritual beliefs.
So, I guess, as far as spiritual beliefs go, if you believe in a higher power who may or
may not exist, we have no physical evidence that they exist, I can kind of see the similarities
there, between the people who support Donald Trump.
He may or may not have a brain, he may or may not have any intelligence to speak of,
and he may or may not do these things that they think he is capable of doing, much like
any unnamed deity that people worship.
See where I'm going with this?
This is one of the more ridiculous legal arguments that we have seen in quite a long time, because
there is nothing spiritual, there is nothing religious about a Make America Great Again
hat.
All it does is signal to the entire world around you, that you make very poor choices
when you go into a voting booth, and that you're probably too stupid to tie your own
shoes.
That, is what I think when I see somebody wearing a MAGA hat.
Am I going to discriminate against them?
No.
Am I going to try to help them cross the street because they'll probably end up getting hit
by traffic 'cause they're not very bright?
Absolutely.
We need to take care of people who obviously aren't bright enough to get along through
life on their own.
But to claim that it's some kind of religious belief or that it's akin to not vaccinating
your children, these arguments don't hold any water.
There's nothing spiritual about a hat that is actually shared ... become a symbol of
the Alt-Right, that was highly present at those Alt-Right white supremacist rallies.
That's not religious, that's not spiritual, and again, aren't Republicans the party that
are telling us that business owners have the right to discriminate?
They've literally been arguing that in court this year, so that Republican business owners
don't have to serve or make cakes for gay people.
So why would a bartender or bar owner in New York City not have the right to throw out
a guy wearing a MAGA hat?
'Cause if you ask me, based on all of the available evidence, the last thing you want
to do is have somebody in a MAGA hat getting all liquored up and possibly becoming violent,
because as we've seen, they do have a history of violence.
The MAGA hat is not a spiritual symbol.
If you want spirituality, go to church.
Go to a synagogue, go to a mosque.
Not a bar in New York City.
Not exactly the kind of house of worship that most people would think of, so I think this
religious argument they're trying to make about this MAGA hat, is going to fall flat
on its face.
-------------------------------------------
Volkswagen Passat Variant Highline Business R 1.4TSI/126pk - Duration: 0:56.
For more infomation >> Volkswagen Passat Variant Highline Business R 1.4TSI/126pk - Duration: 0:56. -------------------------------------------
Spider-Verse | "Warriors" Fanmade Tribute | Tobey, Andrew & Tom | HD - Duration: 2:48.
For more infomation >> Spider-Verse | "Warriors" Fanmade Tribute | Tobey, Andrew & Tom | HD - Duration: 2:48. -------------------------------------------
50k Coins Reward Links in 8 ball |100% Work | No Hack | No Cheat | - Duration: 0:59.
For more infomation >> 50k Coins Reward Links in 8 ball |100% Work | No Hack | No Cheat | - Duration: 0:59. -------------------------------------------
Volkswagen Golf Variant 1.6 TDI COMFORTLINE DSG LED - Duration: 1:00.
For more infomation >> Volkswagen Golf Variant 1.6 TDI COMFORTLINE DSG LED - Duration: 1:00. -------------------------------------------
Manqabat e Aala Hazrat - Raza Raza Mery Ahmed Raza By Asad Attari Almadani 2017 | Studio Kalam - Duration: 7:09.
Manqabat e Aala Hazrat 2017-1439 Hijri Special Kalam Safar ul Muzaffar.
-------------------------------------------
DIT IS ZO ZAAAAAAACHT | unboxing - Duration: 3:48. For more infomation >> DIT IS ZO ZAAAAAAACHT | unboxing - Duration: 3:48. -------------------------------------------
Exercises for a Baby with Low Tone #11: Practicing Hands and Knees - Duration: 1:38.Hello!
My name is Amy Sturkey.
I am a pediatric physical therapist.
I am here with my friend, Myla, who is my co-instructor.
She helps/specializes in teaching how to treat children with low tone.
There you go.
In the last video, I mentioned that her legs were going wild.
So, I did a minor modification with my legs.
I tucked one of my legs in a little further than the other leg.
With that I have been able to get her on her hands and knees.
I've got her hands underneath her shoulders.
So, she is in kind of a hands and knees-ish position.
Oh goodness.
She says, "I don't know about all of this.
This is hard."
Uh-huh.
There you go.
You are doing just fine.
So I am working on hands and knees and rocking this time.
Rock her forward and back and side to side.
If I had a toy in front of us, it would encourage more head up behavior.
Ok, ok, ok.
We got it.
Myla says, "That is enough of that!"
Heavens to Betsies.
That is it.
Another simple idea of working on developmental ideas for a child with low tone.
Thanks a lot.
Bye-bye.
Hi!
You sticking your tongue out at me?
Yes?
Blah!
(Laughter)
-------------------------------------------
OFFICIAL VIDEO - I'm Only a Child, but ... Online Version (Short) - Duration: 7:45.
Hello, I'm Severn Suzuki speaking for ECO
the Environmental Children's Organization.
Vanessa Suttie, Morgan Geisler, Michelle Quigg, and me.
We've raised all the money to come here ourselves
to tell you adults, you must change your ways.
I'm standing in front of you today to tell you adults you must change your ways.
Speaking here today, I have no hidden agenda.
I am fighting for my future.
Losing my future is not like losing an election or a few points on the stock market.
I am here to speak for all generations to come.
I am here to speak on behalf of the starving
children around the world whose cries go unheard.
I am here to speak for the countless animals dying across this planet
because they have no where left to go.
I am afraid of the floods, the droughts, the hurricanes , the extreme weather that is unfolding
around the world.
I'm afraid to breathe the air because I don't know what chemicals are in it.
I feel sad that not only 2 hours away from me, children in a nearby First Nation Community
never grew up on tap water.
They can't drink their water
because of the uranium deposits contaminating their water.
I'm worried about the polar bears 'cause the world is getting hotter
and then the polar bears won't have a home
because it's just melting.
I've heard the cries for help from children from Canada's north, the Pacific Islands,
and around the world.
They are telling us their families and communities are in danger because of rising sea levels
caused by climate change.
I can see the effects of climate change on our world and it deeply saddens and worries me.
Today we hear of animals and plants going extinct every day.
Vanishing forever.
In my life, I've dreamt of seeing the great herds of wild animals, jungles and rainforests
full of birds and butterflies.
Now, I wonder if they will even exist for my children to see.
Did you have to worry of these things when you were my age?
All this is happening before our eyes, and yet we act as if we have all the time we want,
and all the solutions.
I am only a child, and I don't have all the solutions.
But I want you to realize, neither do you.
You don't know how to get the carbon out of the atmosphere.
You don't know how to bring the salmon back up a dead stream.
You don't know how to bring back an animal, now extinct.
You can't bring back the forest that once grew, where there's now a desert.
If you don't know how to fix it, please stop breaking it.
Please stop breaking it.
As adults you might have a job
an official title
you might be delegates of your governments, or business people
or organizers, reporters, professionals, or politicians.
But really, you are mothers and fathers, sisters and brothers, aunts and uncles.
And all of you are someone's child.
I'm only a child, yet I know we are all part of a family.
7.5 billion strong.
In fact 30 million species strong.
And borders and governments will never change that.
I'm only a child, yet I know we are all in this together.
And should act as one single world towards one single goal.
In my anger I am not blind.
And in my fear, I am not afraid of telling the world how I feel.
In my country we make so much waste.
We buy, throw away.
Buy, throw away.
And yet, northern countries will not share with the needy.
Even when we have more than enough, we are afraid to share.
We are afraid to let go of some of our wealth.
In Canada, we live the privileged life.
With plenty of food, water and shelter.
We have watches, bicycles, computers and television sets.
The list could go on for 2 days.
When children from Canada visited kids living on the streets in Rio, Brazil
one child told the visitors
I wish I was rich and if I were, I would give all the street children food, clothes, medicine,
shelters, love and affection.
If a child on the streets who has nothing is willing to share, why are we who have everything,
still so greedy?
I can't stop thinking that these are children my own age.
That it makes a tremendous difference where you were born.
I could be one of those children living in the favelas of Rio.
I could be a child starving in Somalia, or a victim of war in the Middle East
or a beggar in India.
I'm only a child, yet I know if all the money spent on war was spent on finding
environmental answers, ending poverty
and finding treaties, what a wonderful place this earth would be.
At school, even in kindergarten, you teach us how to behave in the world.
You teach us not to fight with others, to work things out, to respect others, to clean
up our mess, to not hurt other creatures.
To share and not be greedy.
Then why do you go out and do the things you tell us not to do?
Do not forget the most important role of any generation of adults
to ensure that the world is as beautiful for the next generation who inherits it.
We are your own children.
You are deciding what kind of world we are growing up in.
Parents should be able to comfort their children by saying, everything's going to be alright
it's not the end of the world, and we're doing the best we can.
But I don't think you can say that to us anymore.
Are we even on your list of priorities?
My Nanaay always says, you are what you do, not what you say.
Well, what you do makes me cry at night.
You grown ups say you love us.
But, we challenge you.
Please make your actions reflect your words.
Thank you.
Haaw'a
Thank you.
Please save your childrens' future. Thank you.
Thank you.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét