The Secret Navy behind the Ballistic Missile Attack on Hawaii
Please find the links to the sources in the video description.
Written by Dr. Michael Salla on January 20, 2018
As information continues to emerge confirming that there was a ballistic missile attack
against Hawaii that was intercepted on January 13, the investigation begins to shift from
what happened, to who was responsible. In this article, I analyze various sources describing
the attack, and identify the mysterious naval force that was most likely responsible for
launching the ballistic missile, which presumably was nuclear armed.
In my January 17 article, I listed three alternative news sites referring to sources
that all said that a ballistic missile was launched against Hawaii by a stealth submarine.
The alternative news sources were radio host Dr. Dave Janda, Operation Disclosure (RV/Intelligence
Alert), and the Public Intelligence Blog. The Operation Disclosure and Public Intelligence
blog sites point to an Israeli submarine as responsible, while Dr. Janda said it was a
submarine belonging to a rogue Chinese Navy faction.
Further corroboration for the ballistic missile attack explanation comes from former Forbes
Magazine writer, Benjamin Fulford, who says that according to his insider sources, there was
a submarine based attack: One sign of this extreme tension came last
week when "a missile from a cabal submarine was stopped from hitting Hawaii and the submarine
was sunk," Pentagon sources say. Media outlets around the world have reported that
Hawaiian residents all received the following warning on their mobile phones: "BALLISTIC
MISSILE THREAT INBOUND TO HAWAII, SEEK IMMEDIATE SHELTER, THIS IS NOT A DRILL," but later
this was reported to be a false alarm. It was not—it was an attempt by "the cabal"
to blame the attack on North Korea and use it as a trigger for their long-desired World
War three, CIA sources say. Both Fulford and the Public Intelligence claim
that the ballistic missile was intended to simulate a North Korean attack suggesting
the responsible submarine was in the vicinity of North Korea, either in the Sea of Japan
or off the Japanese coastline.
In determining the type of missile attack against Hawaii, yet another source refers
to a Hawaii tourist boat about 100 miles out at sea that saw what appeared to be a meteorite
exploding in the air shortly before the Hawaii Emergency alert went out Saturday morning,
January 13. The additional source appeared as an update to the original Public Intelligence
blogsite article about the Hawaii missile attack:
Word here in Hawaii is that a group of tourists and tour guides were on a boat 100 miles off
shore Saturday morning around 8 AM when they witnessed what they thought to be a meteor
blowing up over the ocean. It was reported on Hawaiian channel 2 but then removed from
their website. Rumor is the launch came from an Israel Dolphin 2 submarine. Some college
basketball games had a red alert across the screen from US Pacific Command declaring a
missile launch in the Pacific near Hawaii. This additional Hawaii source is vital in
understanding what happened since it reveals that the missile was coming down from the
upper atmosphere following a ballistic trajectory similar to a meteor. This helps confirm that
a ballistic missile was involved rather than another type of nuclear delivery system such
as a cruise missile which fly much closer to ground and have a far more limited range.
Of the sources cited so far, aside from Dr. Janda, all believe a faction of the Israeli
Navy was behind the attack using a dolphin class submarine supplied by Germany. The USS
Liberty attack during the 1967 Arab Israeli war is often cited as an example of Israel
launching a false flag attack against the U.S. to embroil it in wars against Israel's
regional enemies. In a private email received on January 19,
former CIA covert operative and Marine Intelligence Officer, Robert David Steele, says that the
attack was a "Zionist submarine doing a USS Liberty on Hawaii".
In considering the possibility of a rogue Israeli submarine being responsible, it's
important to review the armaments possessed by the class of submarines belonging to the
Israeli Navy. In a news story describing Israel's possession of Dolphin class submarines purchased
from Germany, its armaments are described as follows:
The Dolphin boats are equipped with six 533mm standard torpedo tubes and four 650mm
jumbo tubes and can carry 16 weapons. The smaller tubes can fire torpedoes and Harpoon
anti-ship missiles as well as other conventional weaponry, but its larger tubes are what makes
the Dolphin class so special. From them, frogmen, remotely operated vehicles and especially
large cruise missiles capable of carrying nuclear payloads can be deployed.
Israel's Dolphin Class submarines can carry cruise missiles which are well suited for
Middle East operations, rather than ballistic missiles which are better suited for long
distance targets thousands of miles away. Ballistic missiles require much larger "boomer
submarines" to launch them, rather than the smaller Dolphin class submarines possessed
by Israel.
The Dolphin 2 submarine is 69 meters (225 feet) in length, which is less than half the
size of the Ohio class boomer submarines (170 meters/560 feet long) used by the US Navy
to carry Trident ballistic nuclear missiles. Sea Launched Ballistic Missiles need vertical
missile tubes as opposed to the more traditional horizontal torpedo tubes used for Sea Launched
Cruise Missiles located at the front of the smaller Dolphin class submarine.
Consequently, it's unlikely that a renegade faction of the Israeli Navy launched the ballistic
missile attack since their Dolphin class submarines simply don't have the capacity.
Furthermore, it's hard to imagine how a U.S. war against North Korea and/or China
would advance Israel's national security interests, which are far more concerned about
threats posed by major regional rivals such as Iran.
Dr. Janda describes a rogue faction of the Chinese Navy being responsible, and that after
the missile had been intercepted and destroyed by the US. Missile defense system, the regular
Chinese Navy destroyed the submarine. This explanation is perhaps the scariest to
consider since the US national security apparatus would almost certainly hold China responsible
for such an attack despite any genuine factional divisions within the Chinese Navy.
The immediate U.S. response would have been, at the very least, a direct retaliatory nuclear
attack against China's main regional ally North Korea, which would have been scapegoated
for a Hawaii attack. After destroying North Korea's military infrastructure, the country
would have then been subsequently overrun and occupied by the U.S. Military and its
South Korean ally in an analogous way to Afghanistan after the 9/11 attack.
China's strategic interests would have been severely setback in such a scenario. It's
hard to imagine any Chinese military commander, rogue Navy faction or not, would risk a nuclear
retaliatory strike by the U.S. that would set back China's steady emergence into a
global superpower over the next decade or so. Patience is a characteristic that China's
political leaders possess in abundance. Consequently, I find it unlikely that a rogue
faction of the Chinese Navy was behind the ballistic missile attack.
So who then launched the attack against Hawaii? For an answer we need to consider legendary
Hawaii Senator Daniel Inouye who in 1987 described the existence of a shadowy government within
the U.S. with its own separate military assets. There exists a shadowy Government with its
own Air Force, its own Navy, its own fundraising mechanism, and the ability to pursue its own
ideas of the national interest, free from all checks and balances, and free from the
law itself.
Inouye was clearly convinced of a very highly classified U.S. agency that had the independent
funding and wherewithal to develop its own Air Force and Navy outside the regular chain
of military command. In contrast to the assets of the regular U.S.
Air Force and Navy, this covert fleet of ships and aircraft would be "dark", in terms
of its security classification. It would therefore be appropriate to call it the "Dark Fleet"
which is what secret space program insider Corey Goode says it is called by the U.S.
military according to his confidential sources [Skype Communication Jan 18). He says that
it is separate to another "Dark Fleet" which is a Secret Space Program that operates
in Deep Space. I need to point out that in 2017, I personally
met some of Goode's confidential Earth Alliance sources. They provided many documents to prove
they are deeply connected to NATO security operations and the European intelligence community.
They have continued to provide Goode intelligence information since they consider him to be
a genuine extraterrestrial contactee, and asset of a Secret Space Program Alliance known
to exist by NATO officials. What U.S. Government agency would have the
ability to raise its own "Dark Fleet" outside the regular chain of military command
and Presidential executive authority? The only U.S. agency capable of doing so is the
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). More specifically, we are talking about the CIA's Directorate
of Operations (formally Clandestine Service) which runs all its global covert operations,
where a Dark Fleet would have been developed to meet operational requirements.
The 1949 CIA Act comprised additions to those sections of the 1947 National Security Act
that dealt with the creation of CIA. The 1949 CIA Act gave a Congressional stamp of approval
to the creation of a 'black budget' it could spend without recourse to U.S. law as
the following section make clear: … any other Government agency is authorized
to transfer to or receive from the Agency such sums without regard to any provisions
of law limiting or prohibiting transfers between appropriations. Sums transferred to
the Agency in accordance with this paragraph may be expended for the purposes and under
the authority of sections 403a to 403s of this title without regard to limitations of
appropriations from which transferred. [50 U.S.C. 403f(a)]
Essentially, this gave the CIA the power to generate large amounts of money through covert
means and launder it however it wished through the Pentagon and the U.S. bureaucracy. The
funding was used for an unofficial "black budget" that by 2001 was estimated to be
as high as $1.7 trillion annually. In addition to having the financial means,
the CIA has long been developing its own covert Air Force. This began in the mid-1950's
when the CIA established Area 51, as the location to develop future fleets of spy planes
with the aid of companies such as Lockheed, which today is the world's largest defense
contractor. In the 1960's the CIA began training personnel
to develop skills necessary to operate its spy planes on U.S. aircraft carriers. CIA
documents confirm that the U.S. Navy was training the CIA on how to operate spy planes on their
carriers.
The above document went on to discuss how Kelly Johnson, Director of Lockheed's Skunkworks,
helped the CIA launch its U-2 spy plane from the USS Kitty Hawk.
Another CIA document shows the Navy's reluctance to allow the CIA to use its aircraft carriers
to carry spy planes in trouble spots like the Mediterranean, thereby creating the operational
necessity for the CIA to eventually acquire its own aircraft carrier to carry fleets of
spy planes around the world.
These official CIA documents support the conclusion that by the 1970's the CIA's Directorate
of Operations had its own squadrons of spy planes, and would have acquired its own aircraft
carrier out of operational necessity that it could operate anywhere around the world
without any kind of government oversight.
As far as the CIA having its own submarines, a Washington Times article from January 3,
1985 shows that two ballistic missile submarines, USS John Marshall and Sam Houston were handed
over to a 2000 man Special Operations Force.
It can be guaranteed that the CIA's Directorate of Operations would have similarly justified
the acquisition of ballistic missile capable submarines for its own covert operations around
the world. With the CIA's role in generating multiple
black budgets, it could easily have diverted some of these funds to defense contractors
for building ballistic missile capable submarines for exclusive use in clandestine operations.
It's worth noting that Lockheed Martin builds the Trident II ballistic missiles for
the Ohio class submarines currently possessed for by U.S. Navy.
As noted earlier, the CIA and Lockheed have developed a long and close relationship since
their joint efforts to develop Area 51 for spy planes and other advanced technologies
in the 1950's. Therefore it is very possible that the CIA's Dark Fleet possesses Trident
II ballistic nuclear missiles developed by Lockheed Martin.
Consequently, Inouye's claims of a shadowy government possessing its own Air Force and
Navy is very feasible given what we know about the CIA's history, and official documents
showing its military assets, training and close relationship with defense contractors
such as Lockheed Martin. The CIA had the independent funding to create
squadrons of spy planes that could operate from an aircraft carrier with the necessary
support craft that altogether constituted a CIA controlled aircraft carrier battle group
that included nuclear submarines. So was the CIA's Dark Fleet behind the ballistic
missile attack on Hawaii? I put this question to Corey Goode and he responded:
Yes, They DO have an Air Craft Carrier and destroyers and support vessels, a whole fleet….This
stuff has been a part of recent briefings in the form of informed speculation as to
what occurred in Hawaii/Japan. All are pretty convinced that rogue CIA sub fired missiles
and MIC SSP [USAF/NRO/DIA Secret Space Program] took the missiles out. We are all waiting
for specifics and confirmation but these are "read in" General/Colonel types doing
the speculating.[Skype Communication 1/19/18)
The CIA's Directorate of Operations has long been the primary asset of what Inouye
called the Shadow Government, but today is referred to as the "Deep State". Due to
President Trump's December 21, 2017, Executive Order freezing the financial assets of all
involved in human rights abuses and corruption, Trump was not only declaring war against U.S.
global elites involved, but also against the funding sources for the CIA's covert operations.
The CIA's black budget is made possible by human rights abuses and corruption around
the planet that provides almost unlimited funds for its covert operations, including
its Dark Fleet. Consequently, the CIA's Dark Fleet had the means, motive and opportunity
to attack Hawaii with a ballistic nuclear missile that would embroil the Trump administration
in a major regional war with North Korea and possibly China.
Significantly, on January 16, Japan's major public broadcaster also warned the public about
an incoming ballistic missile attack. Once again, a false alarm was issued shortly after
by government authorities. It's quite possible that the same submarine
responsible for the Hawaii attack, launched another missile attack, this time against
Japan, presumably Tokyo. It was also brought down, probably by the same defense forces
that tracked and destroyed the Hawaii bound missile. Again, the purpose would have been
to simulate a North Korean attack thereby triggering a major regional war.
Such a war would distract the Trump administration and U.S. military from going after Deep State
assets, and tie down the U.S. in a serious regional confrontation. Thankfully, the U.S.
Navy and Air Force, along with the USAF run secret space program, were able to neutralize
the attacks on Hawaii and Japan. The multiple sources and documents cited above
lead to a remarkable conclusion. A CIA created secret Navy launched ballistic missile attacks
against Hawaii and Japan using a Dark Fleet created in the 1970's to support covert
operations around the world. Consequently, neutralizing the "Dark Fleet"
and reigning in the CIA's Directorate of Operations must become a high priority goal
for the Trump Administration and the Pentagon. A major step in doing so is for the truth
to be officially released about ballistic missile attacks against Hawaii and Japan.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét