WE WERE EXPECTING TO COME IN TODAY AND TALK ABOUT THE
THIRD DAY OF THE SHUTDOWN OF GOVERNMENT, BUT INSTEAD WE
HAVE SOMETHING ELSE.
SOMETHING THAT MIGHT BE WORSE.
A DEAL HAS APPARENTLY BEEN REACHED BETWEEN REPUBLICANS
AND MOST BUT NOT ALL OF THE DEMOCRATS IN THE SENATE AND
MOST RECENTLY, RIGHT BEFORE WE WENT LIVE, IN THE HOUSE AS WELL.
BOTH CHUCK SCHUMER WHO WAS INSTRUMENTAL IN THIS AND
MITCH MCCONNELL HAD STATEMENTS.
MITCH MCCONNELL SAID THIS: I HOPE AND INTEND THAT WE CAN
REACH A BIPARTISAN SOLUTION ON ISSUES SUCH AS MILITARY
SPENDING, IMMIGRATION, AND BORDER SECURITY AND DISASTER
RELIEF BEFORE THE FEBRUARY 8 THE DEADLINE, AND A DEADLINE THEY
ARE SETTING UP, THEY ARE GOING TO FUND THE GOVERNMENTAL
UNTIL THEN.
HE SAYS SHOULD THESE ISSUES NOT BE RESOLVED BY THE TIME THE
FUNDING BILL BEFORE IT EXPIRES, SO LONG AS THE GOVERNMENT
REMAINS OPEN, IT WOULD BE MY INTENTION TO TAKE UP LEGISLATION
HERE IN THE SENATE THAT WOULD ADDRESS DACA, BORDER SECURITY
AND RELATED ISSUES.
HE FURTHER PROMISED THAT THE FUTURE
IMMIGRATION DEBATE WOULD HAVE A LEVEL PLAYING FIELD WERE
SENATORS FROM BOTH PARTIES COULD OFFER AMENDMENTS WHICH CERTAINLY
WOULD BE SOMETHING NEW IN THE SENATE THESE DAYS AND SO
CHUCK SCHUMER IS GETTING A LOT OF HEAT OVER THIS.
HE WAS ENTHUSIASTIC AND I KNOW THAT SOME PEOPLE, I WAS
LISTENING TO ANGUS KING, EXCITED ABOUT THE POSSIBILITY THAT
THIS COULD WORK OUT IN THE LONG RUN, BUT A LOT OF PEOPLE
ARE INCREDIBLY CRITICAL BECAUSE ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT
PILLARS OF THIS IS THAT YOU NEED TO SORT OF TRUST
MITCH MCCONNELL WHO YOU SHOULDN'T TRUST ON FAITH
ALONE AND CERTAINLY ON PAST RECENT EXPERIENCE.
TALK TO SUSAN COLLINS ABOUT HOW MUCH YOU SHOULD TRUST MITCH
MCCONNELL AND WE ARE BEING ASKED TO TRUST HIM.
MCCONNELL PROMISED LAST YEAR FOR VOTES ON HEALTHCARE
WHERE THE DEMOCRATS WOULD BE ABLE TO DO AMENDMENTS AND
IMMIGRATION, STILL WAITING.
LOOK, THE MINUTE SOMEBODY SAYS MITCH MCCONNELL PROMISES, THE
CORRECT ANSWER IS LOL, NOT LIKE OH, MITCH IS PROMISING IT,
THAT WILL PROBABLY COME TO FRUITION.
HAVING SAID THAT, THIS DEAL HAS UPSIDES AND DOWNSIDES.
YOU MIGHT BE SURPRISED TO HEAR THAT FROM ME BECAUSE I'M ALWAYS
YELLING AT THE DEMOCRATS TO TOUGHEN UP AND NOT TAKE CONSTANT
COMPROMISES.
THERE IS A LOT OF THAT IN THIS DEAL, BUT THERE'S ALSO SOME
UPSIDES TOO SO I WANT TO GIVE YOU BOTH POINTS OF VIEW.
I'M GOING TO LET JOHN CONTINUE HERE AND THEN WE WILL BREAK
DOWN WHY IT MAKES SENSE AND WHY IT DOES NOT.
GOOD POINT.
AS I WAS SAYING, A LOT OF PEOPLE ARE WORRIED ABOUT THE PROSPECT
THAT MITCH MCCONNELL'S WORD IS GOING TO BE SORT OF THE
IMPORTANT PART IN THIS AND THE NUMBER OF THE SENATORS WHO
VOTED AGAINST IT, PREDOMINANTLY DEMOCRATS ALTHOUGH THERE
WERE A COUPLE OF REPUBLICANS BUT IN STATEMENTS, A LOT OF
THEM ECHOING THIS.
ONE AS AN EXAMPLE IS KAMALA HARRIS WHO SAID:
THE MAJORITY LEADERS COMMENTS ARE SHORT OF THE IRONCLAD
GUARANTEE.
I REFUSE TO PUT THE LIVES OF 700,000 YOUNG PEOPLE,
REFERRING TO THE DACA PROGRAM, IN THE HANDS OF SOMEONE WHO HAS
REPEATEDLY GONE BACK ON HIS WORD.
YOU CAN FIND SIMILAR QUOTES LIKE
THAT FROM A NUMBER OF DIFFERENT SENATORS AND WE WANT TO
SHOW YOU THE LIST OF THOSE WHO DID ACTUALLY VOTE NO ON THIS.
THIS IS THE FIRST SET RIGHT HERE.
IF YOU BRIEFLY THAT GLAZE OVER THIS YOU'RE GOING TO SEE SOME
STANDOUTS THAT YOU MIGHT NOT OF EXPECTED BUT THEN SOME THAT, IF
YOU ARE LOOKING AHEAD TO 2020 SORT OF MAKE SENSE OF SOME OF
THEM WERE BE THERE AND IF WE GO AHEAD, A FEW MORE THERE.
CHRIS MURPHY, NICE.
AND THEN YOU HAVE MIKE LEE AND RAND PAUL AS WELL BUT
PROBABLY FOR THE NOT FOR THE RIGHT REASONS.
A COUPLE OF COMMENTS ON THAT.
LET'S KEEP IT REAL.
1ST OF ALL, ANY VOTE THAT IS A PROGRESSIVE VOTE, I WILL
TAKE UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES.
I WHILE WANT TO BE CLEAR ABOUT THAT ARE SOME OF THE 2020
CANDIDATES MAKING SURE THAT THEY ARE ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF
THE PROGRESSIVE BASE YEAR?
OF COURSE.
OF COURSE.
AND GOOD, WONDERFUL.
THERE ARE REAL PROGRESSIVES ON THE LIST, THERE ARE PEOPLE
WHO ARE TRYING TO PLEASE PROGRESSIVES THAT ARE
LISTED BY THE WAY, IN WASHINGTON THAT IS FROWNED UPON, THEY
HAD ABOUT THAT WAY.
THERE'S LITERATURE TO THAT THAT OTHERWISE THEY PROBABLY
WOULDN'T HAVE.
AND IT'S YOU GUYS MAKING THEM VOTE THAT WAY.
GOOD, PUT ON MORE PRESSURE.
AND THE THIRD PART OF THAT LIST IS PEOPLE WHO HAVE
PRIMARIES COMING UP.
DIANE FEINSTEIN IS ONE OF THE MOST CONSERVATIVE DEMOCRATS
IN THE COUNTRY.
SHE VOTED FOR BUSH'S TAX CUTS WHEN NOBODY WAS PAYING
ATTENTION, TO REPEAL THE ESTATE TAX WHEN NO ONE IS PAYING
ATTENTION, THE IRAQ WAR, THE LIST GOES ON AND ON TO ALL
THIS AND SHE IS IN A PRIMARY IN CALIFORNIA WHERE THE DREAM
ACT IS PRETTY RELEVANCE AND HER PRIMARY OPPONENTS ARE
PUTTING HEAT ON HER AND SHE'S LIKE NO DREAM ACT?
THEN I SAY NO.
GLAD TO SEE YOU WOKE UP BUT THAT IS PART OF THE MOTIVATION HERE.
ALL GOOD BOTH, I WILL TAKE THEM, BLESS THEIR HEARTS ARE
A BY THE WAY IT'S ENOUGH TO MAKE YOU THINK THAT WE
SHOULD HAVE MORE THESE PRIMARIES A.
MAYBE LONG-TERM IS A GOOD THING FOR THE PARTY.
GEEZ I WONDER IF THAT'S HOW POLITICS WORKS?
BEFORE WE GET INTO SOME OF THE NITTY-GRITTY OF WHAT
CHUCK SCHUMER WAS ABLE TO GET AND WHAT HE REALLY WAS NOT AND
MAY NOT BE CONCERNED ENOUGH ABOUT, DONALD TRUMP HAD A
STATEMENT SAYING I AM PLEASED, GET READY FOR
THE SPIN.
IF YOU BELIEVE THE UPCOMING DEAL, OR MEMBER THIS IS
COMING FROM A PRESIDENT WHO IS SAYING WHATEVER YOU GUYS
GIVE ME APPLE SIGNED UP TO COVER THAT TWO WEEKS AGO THAT HE
NOW SPENDS AT THE ENTIRE DISCUSSION IS ABOUT HOW
UNFAIR ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION IS.
THAT'S A GOOD SIGN FOR THE FUTURE RIGHT THERE AND BY THE
WAY, WE'VE HAD A COUPLE OF SHUTDOWNS LIKE THIS AS IN 2013
WHEN THE DEMOCRATS PUT OUT A SEPARATE BILL BEFORE THE
SHUTDOWN TO MAKE SURE THAT MEMBERS OF THE MILITARY GOT
PAID DURING THE SHUTDOWN WHICH DIDN'T NECESSARILY BE THE
WAY THAT NEEDED TO HAPPEN.
THEY TRIED TO DO THE SAME THING HERE BUT THE REPUBLICANS
WOULD ALLOW ANOTHER SPINNING AS THE DEMOCRATS TRYING TO
STOP MEMBERS OF THE MILITARY FROM BEING PAID.
LET'S TALK ABOUT WHAT'S ACTUALLY IN THIS.
WE HAVE A CONTINUING RESOLUTION THAT FUNDS THE GOVERNMENT
FOR THREE WEEKS WHICH IS DEFINITELY HOW THE MOST
POWERFUL AND INFLUENTIAL COUNTRY IN THE WORLD SHOULD CONTINUE
TO FUNCTION, BEING FUNDED AND THREE WE CAN COMMENCE.
IF WE DON'T HAVE A DEAL ON DOCK AT THE MEANTIME MITCH
MCCONNELL SAYS THAT HE WILL BRING IT UP FOR A VOTE ON
THE SENATE ALTHOUGH WE DON'T KNOW WHAT THAT BILL THAT WILL
BE BROUGHT UP WILL BE AND PAUL RYAN ISN'T BOUND TO DO ANYTHING
IN THE HOUSE AND WE DON'T KNOW IF TRUMP IS OR IS NOT GOING
TO BE INVOLVED IN THAT DEBATE OR WHAT HIS POSITION MIGHT BE
THAT I DON'T THINK HE KNOWS WHAT HIS POSITION MIGHT BE.
THE PLUS SIDE I GUESS AT LEAST IS THAT IN NO PART OF THE DEAL
DID THEY MAKE ANY, DID THEY GIVE AWAY THE WALL FUNDING OR CHANGES
FOR LEGAL IMMIGRATION OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT IN THE PLUS
SIDE, THE ONE GOOD THING IS THAT THEY DID GET SIX YEARS OF
FUNDING FOR CHIP.
WE'VE BEEN WAITING MONTHS FOR THIS DIVE PEOPLE IN MY LIFE
THAT THEIR KIDS ARE ON CHIP AND THEY ARE WORRIED THEY'RE
GOING TO BE TURN OFF THEIR INSURANCE.
NOW WE DON'T HAVE TO GET A FUNDED ONE MONTH AT A TIME
OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT.
6 YEARS OF FUNDING WHICH IS SIGNIFICANT.
IT IS.
LOOK, I KNOW A LOT OF PROGRESSIVES ARE UPSET
ABOUT INEZ USUAL, TO NOT INCLUDE THE DREAM ACT.
I'M GUESS I'M NOT AS UPSET AS OTHER PEOPLE IS BECAUSE I'M
NOT SURPRISED.
A LOT OF PEOPLE HAVE A LOT MORE HOPE THAN I DO.
THEY'RE LIKE I REALLY THINK CHUCK SCHUMER IS GOING TO
DELIVER.
GOOD LUCK WITH THAT.
BUT TO BE FAIR TO CHUCK SCHUMER AND THE OTHER NEGOTIATORS HERE,
IT IS ONLY A THREE WEEK EXTENSION AND AT LEAST CHIP IS
OFF THE TABLE.
NOW I AM NOT UNAWARE OF HOW WE GOT HERE.
BACK IN SEPTEMBER THE REPUBLICANS TOOK TWO HOSTAGES.
ONE WAS CHIP.
IT WAS BIPARTISAN SINCE ITS CREATION IN 1997.
IN FACT ONE OF ITS CREATORS IS ORRIN HATCH OF ALL PEOPLE.
TED KENNEDY AND ORRIN HATCH.
AND CHIP HAS BEEN ENORMOUSLY SUCCESSFUL.
NOW CHILDREN ON CHIP HAVE AS GOOD AS INSURANCE IF NOT
BETTER THAN THE PRIVATE MARKET AND IT HAS REDUCED SICKNESS
AMONG CHILDREN.
IT IS WONDERFUL EXAMPLE OF GOVERNMENT SUCCESS.
THAT IS WHERE THE REPUBLICANS TURN AROUND AND GO WE MUST THINK
ABOUT KILLING IT.
INCLUDING ORRIN HATCH.
NOW THE TIMES OF GOTTEN MUCH MORE VICIOUS AND WHETHER THEY
WANTED TO KILL IT OR NOT, ULTIMATELY, THIS IS THE
BEGINNING OF THAT PROCESS, THE MORE IMPORTANT THING SHORT TERM
WAS TAKEN HOSTAGE SO THAT WHEN YOU GIVE IT BACK TO THE REPUBLIC
THE DEMOCRATS COUPLE MONTHLY TO GIVE YOU THE WHOLE BUDGET AND
THE OTHER HOSTAS THEY TOOK WITH DOCTOR SO TRUMP SAID THAT'S IT,
WERE NOT PROTECTING THE DREAMERS ANYMORE, WE MADE THAT DECISION
UNILATERALLY AND SINCE SEPTEMBER THOSE TWO THINGS THAT WERE
BIPARTISAN AND WERE APPROVED ALL ALONG FOR ALL OF THESE YEARS ALL
OF A SUDDEN BECAME PART OF THE NEGOTIATION SO NOW THE DEMOCRATS
ARE FIGHTING LIKE HELL TO TRY TO GET BACK TO THE STATUS QUO OF
SEPTEMBER 2017 WHEN TRUMP WAS ALREADY IN CHARGE.
THIS IS HOW THE REPUBLICANS PLAY THE GAME.
ONE HOSTAGE AFTER ANOTHER.
CHILDREN MIGHT LOSE THEIR HEALTH INSURANCE?
THIS IS THE REPUBLICAN CAUCUS REACTION TO THAT.
WAY, IS A DONOR CHILDREN?
NO?
THEY DON'T CARE.
DREAMERS.
YOUNG KIDS WHO ARE DOING WELL IN AMERICA WHO DO NOT EVEN
KNOW THE COUNTRY THEY CAME FROM.
WHAT DO THE REPUBLICANS CARE?
THEY DO NOT CARE ABOUT THAT AT ALL.
THAT IS WHY THEY DON'T MEAN TAKING HOSTAGES WHEREAS A LOT OF
DEMOCRATS DO MINDED THAT'S WHY THE REPUBLICANS KEEP DOING IT.
THE WAY THAT IT IS SUPPOSED TO WORK AS THE MANY THEY TAKE
THE HOSTAGE DEMOCRATS ARE GOING TO WORK AT AND GO LOOK AT
THESE MONSTERS WHO JUST ENDED THIS INSURANCE PROGRAM FOR KIDS.
LOOK AT HOW SUCCESSFUL IT WAS NATION FOR LITTLE KIDS TO
HAVE CHIP THAT ARE NO LONGER GOING TO GET HEALTH
INSURANCE AND THAT MIGHT DIE.
INSTEAD, DEMOCRATS DO NOTHING, PLEASE GIVE IT BACK TO US.
NOW I'M ACTUALLY A LITTLE EXCITED WE GOT CHIP BACK
AND FOR JUST A THREE WEEK EXTENSION.
WE GOT HALF THE HOSTAGES BACK.
UNFORTUNATELY IN THIS DAY AND AGE THAT'S ABOUT AS GOOD AS
DEMOCRATIC LEADERSHIP CAN DO.
LOOK OVERALL, AFTER SPENDING THE DAY GETTING UPDATES ON THIS
AND FINDING OUT, IS ELECTION GOING TO PASS AS ORIGINALLY THAT
WHITE HOUSE WAS AGAINST IT AND THEY WERE FOR IT, NOW IT LOOKS
LIKE IT PASSED THE HOUSE DUST I HATE THE HOT TAKES.
HIT THE UNINFORMED KNEE-JERK HOT TAKES THAT THERE WERE
PEOPLE WHO WERE GOING TO DECLARE VICTORY WHEN THEY SOUGHT
REGARDLESS OF THE DETAILS.
THERE WERE PEOPLE WHO WERE GOING TO DAMN IT REGARDLESS OF THE
DETAILS.
BUT WHEN YOU ACTUALLY DOES ORBIT, I THINK THESE PLUSES
ARE GOOD, BUT, I THINK THAT THE DEAL LOOKS BAD AND IS BAD
WHICH ARE DIFFERENT THINGS FOR BOTH OF THEM ARE BAD.
I DON'T THINK THEY THAT THEY SHOULD'VE DONE THIS EVEN THOUGH
THERE ARE SOME GOOD THINGS IN HERE, I THINK THAT CHUCK SCHUMER
AND SOME OF THE OTHER DEMOCRATS EITHER HAD SO LITTLE RESPECT FOR
THEIR OWN ABILITY TO FOR SOMETHING BETTER OR JUST A FEAR
THAT AN ONGOING SHUTDOWN WOULD MAKE THEM LOOK BAD THAT THEY
FELT THE NEED TO BLINK AND I DON'T THINK IT WAS GOING TO MAKE
THEM LOOK BAD, I THINK THEY COULD'VE HELD OUT FOR LONGER AND
LOOK, BEST CASE SCENARIO, MIXED IN WITH WORST-CASE SCENARIO SO
REGULAR SCENARIO, AND THREE WEEKS, WE MIGHT GET DOCK A
OR IN LESS THAN THREE WEEKS.
THAT IS POSSIBLE THAT WE REALLY HAVE TO WAIT AND FIND OUT
THAT ANYONE WHO SAYS THEY KNOW FOR SURE THE MONTH WHERE WE
ARE GOING TO BE IS LENGTHY BECAUSE NOBODY ACTUALLY KNOWS.
DONALD TRUMP DOESN'T KNOW, CHUCK SCHUMER DOESN'T KNOW THAT
WE HAVE TO SEE.
THIS COULD'VE BEEN WORSE BUT IT COULD'VE BEEN BETTER AND I
THINK THAT THIS IS THE SORT OF THING THAT CHUCK SCHUMER
AND THE OTHER DEMOCRATS IN LEADERSHIP DO IT, DOES IT
JUST HAD THEM NOW, LINGERING HURT BECAUSE WHETHER IT IS
IN THREE WEEKS A TRUCK, IT LOOKS LIKE A BETRAYAL RIGHT NOW.
I WANT TO BE CLEAR ABOUT THIS.
AS I JUST TOLD YOU, I THINK IT IS THE BEST THAT DEMOCRATIC
LEADERSHIP CAN DO.
IT IS NOT THE BEST WE CAN GET, NOT EVEN MILES FROM THAT.
SO IN TERMS OF WHAT THEY SHOULD HAVE DONE, I AGREE WITH JOHN.
DACA PULLS ANYWHERE BETWEEN 70 AND 80% DEPENDING ON THE WHEN
YOU'RE LOOKING AT THAT RIGHT NOW THERE'S A 20
POINT GAP ON WHO PEOPLE WOULD BLAME, THEY WOULD BEEN
BLAMED THERE PUBLICANS AND TRUMP THAT YOU CAN'T ANSWER BUT A
SITUATION AND THAT POLITICALLY.
WHERE THE EXCUSES THE DEMOCRATS USED WAS THAT WE HAVE A 14 POINT
LEAD GOING INTO THE 2018
ELECTIONS ON GENERIC BALLOTSÖ BUT, THAT'S IN AND.
BECAUSE WHEN THEY ARE DOWN, I'VE BEEN COVERING IT FOR OVER
20 YEARS, THE DEMOCRATS GO, BUT WE CAN'T BECAUSE WE'RE DOWN
IN THE POLLS AND THIS WILL MAKE US LOOK BAD.
IF YOU ARE DOWN IN THE POLLS YOU CAN'T FIGHT, IF YOU ARE UP
IN THE POLLS YOU CAN'T FIGHT.
WHEN DO YOU FIGHT?
AND THE ANSWER WITH DEMOCRATIC LEADERSHIP IS ALMOST ALWAYS,
NEVER.
RESISTANCE IN THEIR CASE APPARENTLY IS FUTILE.
IT IS TINY, MICROSCOPIC RESISTANCE.
THE CORRECT THING TO DO WOULD BE, I DON'T THEY HEARD US.
TRUMP LIKES TO SHOUT, OKAY, WE CAN SHOUT BACK, BUT WE
DIDN'T STUTTER.
NO DREAM ACT, NO BUDGET.
WE'RE DONE.
AND SO THAT IS THE CONVERSATION WE'RE HAVING WE'RE NOT GOING
BACK TO THE TABLE SO YOU CAN GO SCREAM ALL YOU WANT, YOU CAN
CALL OTHER COUNTRIES AND OTHER PEOPLE ANY NAME YOU LIKE BUT WE
ARE NOT, THERE'S NO DEAL BECAUSE WE ACTUALLY FIGHT FOR VOTERS.
HOW WOULD THAT BE OR WE FIGHT FOR AMERICANS, WE FIGHT FOR
OUR SIDE.
HOW GREAT WOULD THAT BE.
BUT THE DEMOCRATS NEVER HAVE THAT COURAGE BECAUSE THEY VIEW
THEIR CONSTITUENTS IS NOT THERE VOTERS BUT THEIR DONORS SO
WHY DOES CHUCK SCHUMER ACTUALLY PANIC?
HE IS ON THE PHONE 4 TO 5 HOURS A DAY RAISING MONEY.
ALMOST EVERYONE HE IS ON THE PHONE WITH IS A MILLIONAIRE.
ALMOST ALL OF THEM HAVE A LOT OF MONEY IN THE STOCK MARKET.
ALMOST ALL OF THEM ARE PROBABLY TELLING HIM, HEY, WRAP THIS UP.
IF THIS HURTS THE MARKETS, IT HURTS ME WHICH HURTS YOU.
WRAP IT UP ALREADY.
I want to in a specially thank Rick Simpson for saving my friend's life with his healing oil. some years back my friend Rose was diagnosed with a deadly disease cancer of the lungs, we try all medication all to no avail, we also try to do the oil our selves but we were doing more harm than worse. until I saw a post on facebook on how the cannabis oil had cured a cancer patient, I quickly mailed this email: phoenixtearsoil5@gmail.com
Trả lờiXóaFrom that very moment we just have to give it a trier, instantly we got a reply from him asking us what the exact cancer problem that my friend Rose has, we explained every details of it to him and he told us, that his oil will heal my friend cancer problem only if we can order for it as soon as possible.
He calculated the dosage for us to buy i think the dosage he calculated was 60grams of the oil which we ordered plus 30grams maintenance free and also with a body lotion and soap. He told us that if we order it online now by the next 48hours the medication will get to our door step through the delivery services, we decided to give it a try and behold when we did exactly 48hours of ordering the medication came to our door step through the delivery agent and deliver it to us. immediately we emailed Rick back that we have gotten the medication, and the usage instruction manual was also delivered to us. my friend Rose started the medication immediately just after a month of using Rick Simpson cannabis oil, Rose is now free from cancer problem, she is living a healthy life my utmost priority of sharing this short testimony is for those that are suffering from my kind of cancer diseases or if your friend or family members are suffering from this deadly disease, please don't die in silence there is a cure for your cancer today don't waste anytime further you have to email Rick Simpson directly and save your live and the lives of others
E_mail: phoenixtearsoil5@gmail.com