Except it wasn't. It was one out of seven, and later six Tyrannosaurus in the franchise.
And no, he was not Junior from The Lost World. He's a complete stranger.
There is so much wrong with that statement I don't know where to start with…
Okay, that description of the Spinosaurus.
If I was a crocodilian, I'd call him racist!
Ouch.
Second: Why is he using Daffy Duck as an insult? Isn't he supposed to be Dumbass's inspiration who he based his personality of?
Doesn't that mean he's insulting himself?
Third: Would you please knock it off with the masturbation jokes? They're not funny, they're disgusting!
They're so disgusting, the Angry Video Game Nerd doesn't go there, and his show featured puke on diarrhea, so you know even he has lines he doesn't cross!
Actually, scratch that. Even James can make a masturbation joke funny.
Or you know what? Here's a better comparison:
The Cinema Snob doesn't make them as casually as you do, and he's the guy known for reviewing porn!
Fourth, and this is my biggest gripe about this:
His constant trashing of the Transformers movies.
Look… I'm a fan of the Transformers movies. My most favorite is Dark on the Moon on the Sixth of June in a Kenworth pulling logs.
I know the series has problems, but then again, what movie doesn't have problems?
No, what I hate about it is the stupid view everybody makes and their way of thinking that makes this series the absolute worst thing in humanity
as if there are no worse movies ever made and Michael Bay is the enemy of humanity.
Did people forget that Uwe Boll and Ronald Emmerich exist or something?!
Why the Transformers movies are the only one to get ridiculed for being brainless action fest when you have other stupid movies like the Fast and Furious series that went off the wall insane
with venomous masculine men and sexist treatment of women and vehicles doing implausible stunts that Initial D would laugh at them for how ridiculous they are?
Why is every mechanical being whether it was a robot, or an armor automatically makes them "Bayformers" when robots existed way before the Transformers?
Why is every explosion in a movie automatically makes them Michael Bay movies when A) He didn't invent them and B) they were used in action movies all the time!
Oh, you say the Transformers ruined cinema because everybody is trying to copy them?
Gee, I guess by that logic the Marvel Cinematic Universe is ought to be blamed for ruining cinema because we're getting countless failed attempts at starting other cinematic universes.
Or we should blame the Nostalgia Critic because he influenced many copycats and ruined critique forever…
Wait..
But worse than that is the notion that if you like these movies that automatically makes you a stupid person and a disgrace to humanity,
which is complete bullcrap if you ask me!
Now, I openly admit I like the Transformers movies. I like The Lost World. I even like Jurassic Park 3. Yes, we will talk about it by the end.
I even like Fallen Kingdom despite the negative reception it received.
Does that mean I have a horrible taste in movies or I'm a dumb, horny 12-year-old?
If you think that way, then let me tell what's one of my most favorite movies of all time:
This is a black & white movie from 1957. It doesn't have heavy action scenes, it doesn't have romance, it's not a comedy, it's not even that timeless.
It's just a group of men sitting in a single room and all they do is talk to each other.
Yet, it is one of my most favorite movies ever.
I was introduced to this movie in my college years during Business Ethics class. And let me tell you, it changed my way of thinking.
Might not be the same way Camelot did to Linkara, but it did make a lasting impression on me.
If you're wondering why I'm so adamant when it comes to researching and presenting your facts straight,
or why my videos are super long filled with pointless knowledge you don't really need,
blame it on this movie.
This is the movie that taught me the importance of research and devoting your time and effort to present your information without letting your personal feels get in the way.
This movie was a battle, but not a battle of hands or guns. It was a battle of thoughts and it was won not by he who yells the loudest, but he who convinces others by talking them to.
Make them doubt their assumption and back it off using the little details you pick up here and there and present your case.
I know many of my viewers are keeping asking me to do other responses to other Dumbass Critic reviews, even after I made my update video where I stated I'm not doing more of this,
And while I appreciate these requests, and even if certain events didn't occur, I wouldn't be able to present the same quality you see here
because I'm not as hardcore of a fan to other franchises as I am to Jurassic Park.
For example, if I'd respond to the Sailor Moon review, I'll need to watch the entirety of the old anime series, which I guess includes the old and new dubs.
Yes, I read the manga and watched all of Crystal, but I'm still not the most qualified person to do this.
If I'd respond to the IT review, I'll need to read the book, watch the 90s and 2017 version, maybe even wait till chapter two to give a complete judgment,
and study more about Stephen King's mythos to understand his line of thought and what themes he usually uses.
I'm a fan of the Resident Evil franchise and if I'd review the movies I can judge them from both the movie viewer and gamer perspective.
But if I'd make a comparison to Silent Hill, I wouldn't be able to do the same because I'm not that familiar with the Silent Hill games beyond the first one,
and the only way to judge the movies is from the movie viewer's perspective and not the gamer.
The point is, I don't want to make reviews or response videos to whatever people are asking me to do if I'm not familiar to the subject at hand
and the last thing I want to do is giving them a half-baked product of something I couldn't really get into.
Looking back to my original Deadpool response video, it's very underwhelming in both content and production quality. Why?
Because I'm not that familiar to the character and his comic history and I couldn't give a more in-depth presentation as my Jurassic Park series.
The point is: If I'm unable to fully get what I'm asked to review, then I can't make the review in its best quality.
And then we have this clown who thinks he can win his argument by making funny noises and not bothering to understand what he doesn't understand…
Note to self: Old vs New 12 Angry Men.
And by the way, I do have movies I really hate.
Like the Siege and all these hate-filled politically charged movies.
Going back to Transformers a bit, I need to say this:
If you are one of those who claim to be the "Most Hardcore Transformers Fan" and still say these movies are the worst thing to come out of the Transformers, I won't take your word seriously.
For one thing, if you claim to be such a fan, then it means that you know what Kiss Players is.
And if you do know what Kiss Players is and still think the movies are worse, then not only do you imply that you prefer Kiss Players over the movies,
but also imply that you actually like Kiss Players, and that's just wrong!
And by the way, this just occurred to me…
If the Dumbass Critic went to see Age of Extinction…
And then made a video talking about Michael Bay stealing dicks from those who watched it…
Does that mean Michael Bay stole Critic's dick?
Is Critic now a dickless pussy?
Oh, you mean like that time when Bane broke Batman's back in Knightfall and got replaced with Azrael?
Or when Dick Grayson became Batman for a while?
Because it happened.
There's a thing called "Legacy Character", and it's been around for quite a while.
Some characters get killed or retired and replaced by other characters who carry their legacy.
Sometimes it works, other times doesn't and the original character is brought back. It's nothing new.
There are times when change of formula is necessary to increase the longevity. It gives chances for creativity and adding new things and not get repetitive to the point it gets stale.
Take the Marvel Cinematic Universe for example.
While all their movies are comic book movies, each movie is different enough from each other and they explore multitude of genres and styles
and that's why they never get boring or repetitive even when they make several origin movies.
Do you know why DC fans are getting sick of Batman these days?
Because DC and WB respectively are constantly kissing his ass by making countless comics and adaptations based on him,
and if it wasn't about him, then it's about a character from his universe.
How the hell do you decide on three Harley Quinn movies and two Joker movies before the Martian Manhunter, or even a Man of Steel sequel?!!
Batman is constantly getting the exposure over every other DC character to the point the major DC characters are slowly becoming D-Listers
because the great and powerful goddamn Batman is always on the spotlight while everybody else is his cheerleader.
Same thing with X-Men and Wolverine. Wolverine is known to be everywhere and is used as a publicity stunt to the point of naming a Trope after him and the fans got sick of him as well.
And apparently the MCU is getting guilty of it because people are noticing that Iron Man is getting too much exposure compared to other MCU heroes.
Some things needs to be changed, and some characters needs to take a break from over-exposure.
Transformers Rescue Bots is looked down by Transformers fans because it's a kids show,
but frankly, it's one of the most refreshing takes of the franchise and one of the most unique entries because it doesn't follow the usual formula
and it allows for other characters to shine who are not Optimus, Megatron, Bumblebee or Starscream.
Also because it's well written and a fun show with fun characters.
I know change can be hard to take. I've been there with many of my favorite franchises.
But by the end, we come to accept it if it was really good.
Aliens is a different movie from Alien. It used a different direction and different style and yet it's still seen as one of the best movies and one of the best sequels.
On the other hand, many people have criticized Star Wars: The Force Awakens for being too similar to older movies and wasn't creative enough.
Then came The Last Jedi and it tried to be different, but it was hated not for the changes it made, but because it was badly written.
Now, killing off the T-Rex was indeed a risk.
Perhaps one of the riskiest things the movie ever did, and Joe Johnston knew it would be such,
but he still took it to give us something unique for this installment.
For someone who keeps demanding for change with the Transformers movies to the point of making a video about how it's always the same,
I find it hypocritical from you when you refuse change with something you like.
Also ironic when it comes from someone who killed his own show because it wasn't "creative" enough.
Oh please, don't try to pretend you never went with child abuse jokes in your life!
I'm scared for the time in which Doug ends up having a kid…
No, not for Doug, but for his child.
With James, we get to see and hear stories of him and his daughters and how good of a father he is.
But Doug raising a baby…? No… just thinking about it brings me nightmares…
Okay people, let's get some facts straight.
This pansy does not deserve your sympathy!
He's a disgrace to the Tyrannosaurus and doesn't deserve all your tears and tributes.
First of all, look at his first appearance: He's eating from a carcass.
While Roberta, Buck, Doe and even Junior were hunting for their meals,
this guy is scavenging from a dinosaur that was already dead.
He didn't work for it, he just went for an easy meal without putting any effort.
And before you say: "It might've been a dinosaur he killed",
I have the evidence to back me up straight from the people who worked in this movie:
There you go. He's a lazy scavenger, not a hunter.
Then the fight itself. He drew first blood and snagged the Spinosaurus' neck, and yet he failed to kill her?!
The Tyrannosaurus has the strongest jaws in the animal kingdom, and he couldn't crush Spino's neck in one bite?
What is he, an Overwatch character in his third Nerf patch?
At least when Roberta fought Indominus she had the excuse of being too old and didn't fight someone her size in ages
along with Indominus having armored skin, so it made her battle a bit more difficult, yet still put a better fight than he did!
This Sub-Adult was young and healthy, and his opponent didn't have any skin protection, so what's his excuse?
Was his bite a form of nudging or something? Did he expect the Spinosaurus to back off after a warning bite?
What a pushover! Who wants to defend this loser anyway?
But… let's be fair people… it's still not the most embarrassing Tyrannosaurus fight in history.
Oh, no, there is one that is even more humiliating…
For the record, this is the same Tyrannosaurus that took an RPG to the face, shrugged off several tank missiles,
But this giant space flea from out of nowhere wipes the floor with him in less than a minute?! That's a new record!
Okay, let's go back to the calm levels.
I stated before that I did like the Spinosaurus and I was agreeing with the replacement and giving the T-Rex a little break from the spotlight.
Watching behind the scene stuff, I can't help but feel bad for everyone who worked hard on her.
You can feel how excited they were that they were able to build something so massive and impressive,
only to get hate letters and negative reception to her, and no one gave their appreciation to it.
This bit now is something some of you might not agree with, but I think the Tyrannosaurus is a bit of a vanilla theropod.
Sure, it's iconic, but at the same time there other theropods that look cooler and stranger than it and frankly they do need some exposure:
Like the giant Giganotosaurus
the crested Cryolophosaurus
Bahariasaurus with its weird throat thingie
Spinosaurus's cousin the Oxalaia
there is a vast collection of dinosaurs to use but they don't get the exposure because the Tyrannosaurus is always on the top billing.
Give Disney some credit. While their version of the Carnotaurus was more like a Tyrannosaur with horns,
they were a bit creative in not using the typical T-Rex for their dinosaur movie.
Also their Velociraptors were more accurate looking to the real thing than Jurassic Park, so they did something right.
And as much as I hate the Walking With Dinosaurs movie, they still had the right idea of using other dinosaurs instead of the usual ones we see everywhere.
I also explained how the battle itself had to be cut short due to the unexpected destruction of the Rex's puppet,
and they had to make up for it using whatever they could at the time.
Also something recent I discovered
I know, you want to move on, just bear with me
Remember when I made my speculation of Roberta's battle with the I-Rex being the Spinosaurus fight that we were meant to have and showed similar scenes between the movie and the test footage?
In one of the trailers I found recently, there's a shot that wasn't used in the movie consists of Spinosaurus smacking Rex's face with her arm, which did happen in Jurassic World.
So I ask once again: Is the Indominus battle the battle we were supposed to get in JP3? I hope we get confirmation of this.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét