Thứ Ba, 4 tháng 4, 2017

Youtube daily report Apr 5 2017

♪♪♪

♪ These arms of mine

♪ They are lonely

♪ Lonely and feeling blue

♪ These arms of mine

♪ They are wanting

♪ Wanting to hold you

♪ And if you

♪ Would let them hold you

♪ Oh, how grateful I would be

♪ These arms of mine

♪ They are burning

♪ Burning from wanting you, yeah ♪

♪ And if you

♪ Would let them hold you

♪ Oh, how grateful I would be

♪ Oh

♪ Come on

♪ So come on

♪ Come on ♪ Come on, baby

♪ Oh

♪ Just be my little woman

♪ I need, I need your loving

♪ I'm down

♪ Down on my knees, baby

♪ I need you in these arms

♪ These arms of mine

[ Cheers and applause ]

For more infomation >> The Voice 2017 Knockouts - TSoul: "These Arms of Mine" - Duration: 2:17.

-------------------------------------------

The Voice 2017 Knockouts - Brennley Brown: "Up to the Mountain" - Duration: 2:18.

♪♪♪

♪ I went up to the mountain

♪ Because you asked me to

♪ Up over the clouds

♪ To where the sky was blue

♪ I could see all around me

♪ Everywhere

♪ I could see all around me

♪ Everywhere

♪ Some days I look down afraid

♪ Afraid I will fall

What?

♪ And though the sun shines

♪ I see nothing, nothing at all ♪

♪ Then I hear your sweet voice

♪ Come and then, come and then go ♪

What?

♪ Lord, telling me softly

♪ You love me so

♪ Ooh-ooh

[ Cheers and applause ]

For more infomation >> The Voice 2017 Knockouts - Brennley Brown: "Up to the Mountain" - Duration: 2:18.

-------------------------------------------

The Voice 2017 Knockouts - Aaliyah Rose: "Like I'm Gonna Lose You" - Duration: 2:07.

♪♪♪

♪ I found myself dreaming

♪ In silver and gold

♪ Like a scene from a movie

♪ That every broken heart knows ♪

♪ Woke up in tears, you by my side ♪

♪ Breath of relief, and I realized ♪

♪ No, we're not promised tomorrow ♪

♪ So I'm gonna love you

♪ Like I'm gonna lose you

♪ I'm gonna love you

♪ Like I'm gonna lose you

♪ In the blink of an eye

♪ Just a whisper of smoke

♪ You could lose everything

♪ The truth is you never know

♪ Let's take our time

♪ Say what we want

♪ Use what we got

♪ Before it's all gone

♪ We're not promised tomorrow

♪ I'll tell you, I'm gonna love you ♪

♪ Like I'm gonna lose you

♪ I'm gonna love you

♪ Like I'm saying goodbye

♪ Wherever we're standing

♪ I won't take you for granted

♪ 'Cause we'll never know when

♪ When we'll run out of time

♪ So I'm gonna love you

♪ Like I'm gonna lose you

♪ I'm gonna love you

♪ Like I'm gonna lose you

Yes!

[ Cheers and applause ]

For more infomation >> The Voice 2017 Knockouts - Aaliyah Rose: "Like I'm Gonna Lose You" - Duration: 2:07.

-------------------------------------------

The Voice 2017 Knockouts - Dawson Coyle: "Demons" - Duration: 2:00.

♪ When the days are cold

♪ And the cards all fold

♪ The saints we see

♪ Are all made of gold

♪ Your dreams all fail

♪ And the ones we hail

♪ Are the worst of all

♪ And the blood's run stale

♪ I wanna hide the truth

♪ I wanna shelter you

♪ But with the beast inside

♪ There's nowhere we can hide

♪ No matter what we breed

♪ We still are made of greed

♪ This is my kingdom come

♪ This is my kingdom come

♪ When you feel my heat

♪ Look into my eyes

♪ It's where my demons hide

♪ It's where my demons hide

♪ Don't get too close

♪ It's dark inside

♪ It's where my demons hide

♪ It's where my demons hide

♪ They say it's what you make

♪ I say it's up to fate

♪ It's woven in my soul

♪ I need to let you go

♪ Your eyes, they shine so bright ♪

♪ I wanna save that light

♪ I can't escape this now

♪ Unless you show me how

♪ Look into my eyes

♪ It's where my demons hide

♪ Oh, it's where my demons hide ♪

♪ Don't get too close

♪ It's dark inside

♪ It's where my demons hide

♪ It's where my demons hide

[ Cheers and applause ]

Yeah!

For more infomation >> The Voice 2017 Knockouts - Dawson Coyle: "Demons" - Duration: 2:00.

-------------------------------------------

The Voice 2017 Knockouts - Anatalia Villaranda: "Two Black Cadillacs" - Duration: 2:12.

♪♪♪

♪ Two black Cadillacs driving in a slow parade ♪

♪ Headlights shining bright in the middle of the day ♪

♪ One for his wife

♪ The other for the woman who loved him at night ♪

♪ Two black Cadillacs meeting for the first time ♪

♪ And the preacher said he was a good man ♪

♪ And his brother said he was a good friend ♪

♪ But the women in the two black veils didn't bother to cry ♪

♪ Bye-bye

♪ Bye-bye

♪ It was the first and the last time ♪

♪ They saw each other face to face ♪

♪ They shared a crimson smile and just walked away ♪

♪ And left the secret at the grave ♪

♪ And the preacher said he was a good man ♪

♪ And his brother said he was a good friend ♪

♪ But the women in the two black veils didn't bother to cry ♪

♪ Bye-bye, Bye-bye ♪ Yeah, yeah, yeah

♪ They took turns laying a rose down ♪

♪ Threw a handful of dirt into the deep ground ♪

♪ He's not the only one who had a secret to hide ♪

♪ Bye-bye ♪ Bye-bye

♪ Bye-bye

♪ Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah

[ Cheers and applause ]

For more infomation >> The Voice 2017 Knockouts - Anatalia Villaranda: "Two Black Cadillacs" - Duration: 2:12.

-------------------------------------------

The Voice 2017 Knockouts - Enid Ortiz: "When We Were Young" - Duration: 2:11.

[ Cheers and applause ]

♪♪♪

♪ Everybody loves the things you do ♪

♪ From the way you talk

♪ To the way you move

♪ Everybody here is watching you ♪

♪ 'Cause you feel like home

♪ You're like a dream come true ♪

♪ But if by chance you're here alone ♪

♪ Can I have a moment

♪ Before I go?

♪ 'Cause I've been by myself all night long ♪

♪ Hoping you're someone

♪ I used to know

♪ You look like a movie

♪ You sound like a song

♪ My God, this reminds me, yeah ♪

♪ Of when we were young

♪ Let me photograph you in this light ♪

♪ In case it is the last time

♪ That we might be exactly like we were ♪

♪ Before we realized

♪ We were sad of getting old

♪ It made us restless

♪ Oh, I'm so mad I'm getting old ♪

♪ It makes me reckless

♪ It was just like a movie

♪ Just like a song

♪ When we were young

[ Cheers and applause ]

For more infomation >> The Voice 2017 Knockouts - Enid Ortiz: "When We Were Young" - Duration: 2:11.

-------------------------------------------

The Moment We've All Been Waiting For | Season 6 Ep. 22 | NEW GIRL - Duration: 1:40.

[MUSIC PLAYING - LORDE, "GREEN LIGHT"]

LORDE: [singing] But I hear sounds in my mind.

Come on, come on, come on.

LORDE: [singing] Brand new sounds in my mind.

Come on!

LORDE: [singing] But honey, I'll be seeing you ever I go.

But honey I'll be seeing you down every road.

Jess, where'd you go?

Jess!

JESS: Nick?

Why are you down there?

Stay right there!

JESS: Stay right there!

LORDE: [singing] 'Cause honey I'll come get my things,

but I can't let go.

Come on, come on. Come on.

LORDE: [singing] I'm waiting for it, that green light,

I want it.

Oh I wish I could get my things--

[ding]

LORDE: [singing] --and just let go.

Oh, come on.

Please go faster.

I've got to tell my best friend I'm in love.

Take a shower first.

I've never seen anyone sweat so much.

You take your shower. You smell terrible!

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

You smell terrible!

[laughing]

Hey, Miller.

Hey.

LORDE: [singing] That green light, I want it!

For more infomation >> The Moment We've All Been Waiting For | Season 6 Ep. 22 | NEW GIRL - Duration: 1:40.

-------------------------------------------

UQx PSYC1030.1x 7-5-3 Part A: Self-regulation of eating - Duration: 5:49.

Many people think of self-control as having something to do with eating and dieting.

And this is of interest when we have issues like an overweight population.

So, let's spend some time thinking about how self-control can reflected in eating and

dieting.

Dieting is extremely common.

By some measures, the majority of girls have dieted by the age of 13 already (Heatherton

& Baumeister, 1991).

Half of the female students at the university will be on a diet at any given time.

Rates of dieting are a little bit lower among men, but increasing there too.

We know dieting is largely unsuccessful in the long term - people will lose weight but

then they gain it back and often they gain back more than they lost in the first place

(Heatherton, Polivy & Herman, 1991).

So, what happens is gradually the weight gets higher and higher.

And the going up and down is especially bad for your body.

It's bad for your body to gain and lose weight.

It may be healthier to even just be fat and stay fat than to be fat and thin, fat and

thin and fat, and plus inner processes, your body learns to resist the dieting.

It's not the greatest thing.

But, consider for a minute how these three components of self-control are illustrated

in the example of dieting.

First the standards.

These are the ideas of how you should look.

The standards tend to be unrealistic.

People have an idea of what they should weigh, and how thin they should be.

These standards somehow have gotten increasingly difficult.

There are some nice studies done in the United States looking at say our Miss America beauty

contest, supposedly the most beautiful women in the country compete to be chosen as Miss

America.

So, some researchers look at these year after year, and over the years, all the contestants

for this crown have gotten thinner, year after year it's a thinner crop of contestants.

Also, going back to the 1950's the winner tended to be about average of the top 50 contestants.

We have 1 from each of the 50 states, but by the 1970's the winner was one of the

thinnest even among that thinner group of which all of them were thinner than they were

in the 50s.

The same went for pinup women and Playboy centrefolds - Playboy magazine had pictures

of scantily clad women.

They too became thinner over the years.

That's a sign that the cultural norms for thinness, the ideals that women embrace become

increasingly unrealistic.

So, standards contribute to some of the pathological eating patterns.

It's very much an aspect of the competition among women that drives this.

It isn't that their boyfriends there – there may be some pressure from there.

The women clearly want to be thinner than their boyfriends want them to be, the men

actually don't seem to care as much or they like a wider variety.

So, it's locking onto these unrealistic standards that puts the increasing pressure

so that's one thing that makes dieting, more difficult and more doomed.

The second component of self-control I said is monitoring, keeping track.

What happens when you go on a diet you usually keep track very scrupulously, you keep track

of what you eat, you record how many calories you consume each day, also you weigh yourself

repeatedly to see if your weight is changing.

This is an interesting thing, they use to say don't weigh yourself every day, because

that will be discouraging, your weight will fluctuate from one day to the next and so

on.

They use to say only weigh yourself once per week and that kind of disturb me as a self-regulation

researcher, it went against the prevailing evidence, you've got to monitor yourself

and keep track regularly.

So, I was puzzled about this for a while but then a study came out about five years ago

I think that found that people who weighed themselves every day, they are the ones who

do the best at losing weight and keeping it off.

So, yes, that's what we thought all along - keep track of your behaviour very explicitly,

weigh yourself every day, store that information, that's what contributes to success.

Now, in terms of monitoring what you eat, well, that's important, and people eat more

when they don't keep track of what they're consuming.

There are plenty of interesting studies on this – there are studies for example that

ask people "how do you know when you are finish eating, or when your meal is ended?

When they gave this In France, one of the common answers was – I know dinner is over

when the food doesn't taste quite as good to me anymore.

So, they are noticing the taste of the food and they start to get a little less pleasure

and that's a sign that their body isn't craving it as much so they stop eating.

In America, one of the most common answers was – I know dinner is over when the television

program I'm watching is over.

So, they're not paying attention at all to how much they're eating.

They're just watching television and they eat until the show is over and then they stop.

So, if they're paying attention to the television and they're watching a sporting game, if

the games goes into overtime, they eat another plate of french fries.

Or other people have done studies in bars where you can pay a certain fee and you can

eat all you want say of chicken wings Some researchers went to a couple of these

and they said "We're going to tell the wait staff, by random assignment with some

of these tables, clear away the bones whenever you can, from people eating chicken - it makes

bones, clear away the bones.

And with others, don't clear the bones away until they've finished eating, let the bones

pile up.

So, what do you think happened?

For more infomation >> UQx PSYC1030.1x 7-5-3 Part A: Self-regulation of eating - Duration: 5:49.

-------------------------------------------

Hispanic contractor wants to build Mexico wall - Duration: 2:36.

For more infomation >> Hispanic contractor wants to build Mexico wall - Duration: 2:36.

-------------------------------------------

Rep. Denny Heck On Donald Trump-Russia: There's So Much Smoke Here | Hardball | MSNBC - Duration: 6:42.

>>> GOOD EVENING. I'M CHRIS MATTHEWS FROM

WASHINGTON. THE BIG NEWS OF THE WEEK REMAINS

THE INVESTIGATIONS INTO RUSSIA'S MEDDLING IN OUR ELECTION AND THE

RECIPROCAL ROLE PLAYED BY THE TRUMP PEOPLE.

HERE ARE THE LATEST HEADLINES. THE FINANCIAL TIMES REPORTS THAT

THE FBI IS SETTING UP A SPECIAL SECTION BASED HERE IN WASHINGTON

TO COORDINATE ITS INVESTIGATION. ACCORDING TO THE TIMES, THE MOVE

IS A SIGN OF HOW SERIOUSLY THE BUREAU IS TAKING ALLEGATIONS OF

RUSSIAN MEDDLING INTO AMERICAN POLITICS AND IS ALSO AIMED AT

GIVING FBI DIRECTOR JAMES COMEY GREATER VEZABILITY INTO THE

INVESTIGATION AND ITS DETAILS. THERE WILL BE MORE THAN 20

DEDICATED AGENTS WORKING ON THE INVESTIGATION.

THEY WILL BRIEF COMEY ON A WEEKLY BASIS.

MEANWHILE, NBC NEWS HAS CONFIRMED THAT BOMBSHELL

WASHINGTON POST REPORT THAT THE UNITED ARAB EMIRATES ARRANGED A

SECRET MEETING IN JANUARY, A WEEK BEFORE THE INAUGURATION

BETWEEN BLACKWATER FOUNDER ERIC PRINCE AND A RUSSIAN CLOSE TO

PRESIDENT VLADIMIR PUTIN AS PART OF AN APPARENT EFFORT TO

ESTABLISH A BACK CHANNEL LINE OF COMMUNICATION BETWEEN MOSCOW AND

PRESIDENT-ELECT DONALD TRUMP. THE POST NOTED THAT PRINCE

PRESENTED HIMSELF AS AN UNOFFICIAL ANN VEY FOR TRUMP.

THE BLACKWATER FOUNDER GAVE A QUARTER OF A MILLION DOLLARS TO

THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN, AND PRO-TRUMP SUPER PACs LAST YEAR

AND HE'S BEEN SITTING IN THE TRUMP'S TRANSITION OFFICES IN

DECEMBER. A SPOKESPERSON FOR PRINCE

REJECTED THE STORY AND THE WHITE HOUSE CALLED THE SUGGESTION OF A

BACK WATER CHARGE RIDICULOUS. MEANWHILE AS THE INVESTIGATION

MOVES FORWARD, TRUMP PUSHES STORIES THAT DISTRACT ATTENTION

FROM THE INVESTIGATION. YESTERDAY, FOR EXAMPLE,

BLOOMBERG'S ELI LAKE REPORTED, WHITE HOUSE LAWYERS LAST MONTH

LEARNED THAT THE FORMER NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISER SUSAN RICE

REQUESTED THE IDENTITIES OF U.S. PERSONS IN RAW INTELLIGENCE

REPORTS ON DOZENS OF OCCASIONS THAT CONNECT TO THE TRUMP TRAN

SKPIGS AND CAMPAIGN ACCORDING TO U.S. OFFICIALS FANL WITH THE

MATTER. TODAY, PRESIDENT TRUMP

RE-TWEETED A DRUDGE REPORT HEADLINE ABOUT THAT STORY.

IN AN EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW WITH ANDREA MITCHELL, SUSAN RICE

EXPLAINED THERE IS A BIG DIFFERENCE BETWEEN REQUESTING

INFORMATION ABOUT SOURCES IN INTELLIGENCE REPORTS AND

SURVEILLING POLITICAL OPPONENTS AS PRESIDENT TRUMP HAS ALLEGED.

LET'S WATCH HER. >> THE ALLEGATION THAT SOMEHOW

OBAMA ADMINISTRATION OFFICIALS UTILIZED INTELLIGENCE FOR

POLITICAL PURPOSES. THAT'S ABSOLUTELY FALSE.

THERE WERE OCCASIONS WHEN I WOULD RECEIVE A REPORT IN WHICH

A U.S. PERSON WAS REFERRED TO. NAME NOT PROVIDED.

JUST U.S. PERSON. AND SOMETIMES IN THAT CONTEXT,

IN ORDER TO UNDERSTAND THE IMPORTANCE OF THE REPORT AND

ASSESS ITS SIGNIFICANCE, IT WAS NECESSARY TO FIND OUT OR REQUEST

THE INFORMATION AS TO WHO THAT U.S. OFFICIAL WAS.

>> WELL, CONGRESSMAN ADAM SCHIFF, THE RANKING MEMBER OF

THE HOUSE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE SAID THE WHITE HOUSE IS TRYING

TO CHANGE THE FOCUS AND DIVERT THE INVESTIGATION INTO HIS

CAMPAIGN'S TIES TO RUSSIA. LET'S WATCH THIS.

>> IF ANYONE IN THE WHITE HOUSE HAD A CONCERN ABOUT ANY OF THESE

MATERIALS, THEY SHOULD HAVE BEEN SHARED AND NOT GONE THROUGH THIS

CHARADE THAT WE SAW OVER THE LAST TWO WEEKS.

WHAT PROMPTED THAT? WHAT WAS THE URGENCY THERE WHEN

WE'VE ALREADY ASKED FOR MATERIALS ABOUT INCIDENTAL

COLLECCOLLECTION? AND I HAVE TO THINK THE URGENCY

WAS CREATED AT THAT MONDAY HEARING WHEN JAMES COMEY SAID

NOT ONLY THERE WAS NO TRUTH TO THE PRESIDENT'S CLAIM THAT HE

WAS SURVEILLED OR WIRETAPPED OR WHAT HAVE YOU, BUT ALSO WHEN THE

FBI DIRECTOR SAID THAT THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN TEAM WAS UNDER AN FBI

INVESTIGATION. I THINK THIS WAS THE RESPONSE TO

THAT RATHER BREATHTAKING HEARING.

>> CONGRESSMAN DENNY HECK IS A MEMBER OF THE HOUSE INTELLIGENCE

COMMITTEE. SIMON MARKS, AND DAVID CORNISH,

WASHINGTON BUREAU CHIEF. CONGRESSMAN, LET ME ASK YOU

ABOUT THIS. WHAT DO YOU MAKE OF THIS

INVESTIGATION AND THE FACT THAT COMEY, THE FBI DIRECTOR, IS

REALLY KIND OF FOCUSING ATTENTION, CREATING A SPECIAL

SECTION TO GO INTO WHAT HAPPENED BETWEEN RUSSIA AND THE TRUMP

PEOPLE? >> SO ONE FORMER FBI AGENT

INDICATED THAT THIS REPRESENTS A SURGE IN RESOURCES.

ANYBODY ASSOCIATED WITH THE TRUMP ORBIT THAT WAS INVOLVED IN

RUSSIA FINAL ENTANGLEMENTS PROBABLY WAS CALLING THEIR

LAWYER TODAY, CHRIS. THAT'S WHAT I MAKE OF IT.

>> LET ME ASK YOU ABOUT THIS OTHER LATER BOMBSHELL STORY,

THAT THERE WAS A MEETING NINE DAYS BEFORE INAUGURATION BETWEEN

THE BLACKWATER FOUNDER, THE BROTHER OF THE PERSON BETSY

DeVOS, OF COURSE WHO WAS NAMED BY TRUMP TO BE SECRETARY OF

EDUCATION, HER BROTHER. THE GUY OVER IN THE SEYCHELLES

WITH THE PUTIN GUY. WHAT IS A HUGE BACKER OF A

PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE WHO HAS ALREADY BECOME A PRESIDENT-ELECT

DOING FISHING OUT THERE, PUTTING TOGETHER RELATIONS WITH RUSSIA?

I DON'T KNOW WHETHER IT'S ILLEGAL, BUT IT CERTAINLY

SUGGESTS MORE ENTANGLEMENT BETWEEN THE TRUMP FOLKS AND THE

PUTIN FOLKS. >> CHRIS, THERE'S SO MUCH SMOKE

HERE. EVERY SMOKE ALARM IN THE HOUSE

IS GOING OFF. THERE'S SO MUCH SMOKE HERE YOU

CAN'T SEE A FE A FOOT IN FRONT YOUR FACE.

LISTEN, THIS THING IS TAKING ON A LIFE OF ITS OWN.

IT'S GATHERING SPEED. IT'S THE SENATE.

IT'S THE FBI WITH NEW RESOURCES AND BY THE WAY I HAVE IT BY WORD

TONIGHT THAT THE HOUSE IS GOING TO GET ITS INVESTIGATION BACK ON

TRACK. THE CHAIR AND THE RANKING

MEMBER, I BELIEVE, ARE NEAR AGREEMENT ON A WITNESS LIST SO

WE CAN ENTER THE AUCTION. AND AS I HAVE SAID ALL ALONG, I

WOULDN'T BE THE SLIGHTEST BIT SURPRISED IF THERE AREN'T ALSO

SOME LOCAL PROSECUTORS LOOKING INTO SOME THINGS LIKE THIS.

>> IS THE CHAIRMAN OF YOUR COMMITTEE HIS OWN MAN?

>> WELL, CHRIS, I AM GOING TO GIVE HIM THE BENEFIT OF THE

DOUBT OF AN OPPORTUNITY TO GET THIS BACK ON TRACK.

>> OKAY. LET ME PUT IT THIS WAY.

>> I ASKED HIM TO RECUSE HIMSELF.

I THINK THAT WAS THE RIGHT THING TO DO.

BUT RIGHT NOW LET'S FOCUS ON GETTING IT BACK ON TRACK.

>> THE REASON I ASKED THAT IS OBVIOUS.

BUT I ALSO KNOW FROM A FORMER MEMBER OF THE HOUSE WHO IS NOW

IN THE SENATE ONCE TOLD ME THAT WHEN YOU GO INTO MARKUP AND YOU

ACTUALLY HAVE TO WRITE BILLS, YOU CAN SOMETIMES REALIZE THAT

ONE OF YOUR COLLEAGUES IS IN THE TANK WITH SOME CORPORATION.

THEY BEGIN TO BEHAVE LIKE THEY'RE NOT REALLY THEIR OWN

PERSON. WE'VE SEEN PRETTY ADEQUATE

EVIDENCE THAT MR. NUNES IS NOT HIS OWN PERSON.

WHAT'S HE DOING HANGING AROUND PICKING UP THE LAUNDRY FROM THE

WHITE HOUSE AND TAKING IT BACK TO THE WHITE HOUSE AFTER HE'S

CLEANED IT BY SAYING HE'S AN INVESTIGATOR?

HE WASN'T AN INVESTIGATOR. HE WAS A DELIVERY BOY, BRINGING

THIS STUFF BACK THAT THEY GAVE HIM AND SAYING IT WAS NEWS,

ALARMING NEWS. IF THAT ISN'T SHOW BOATING FOR

THE PRESIDENT, I DON'T KNOW WHAT IS.

WHAT DO YOU THINK IT WAS? >> I THINK THE BEST THING THAT

CAN BE SAID ABOUT IT IS THAT IT'S HAM HANDED.

I'VE SAID ALL ALONG I FEEL LIKE I'M WATCHING A 3-D MOVIE,

DECEPTION, DEFLECTION, AND DISTRACTION.

THAT'S WHAT HE'S TRYING TO DO. BUT IT'S NOT GOING

For more infomation >> Rep. Denny Heck On Donald Trump-Russia: There's So Much Smoke Here | Hardball | MSNBC - Duration: 6:42.

-------------------------------------------

Behind the Camera: Mountain Search & Rescue | Frontier Borneo S01E06 - Duration: 2:24.

The Kinabalu earthquake simulation was Frontier Borneo's first big shoot.

We had almost the whole production team out there.

From a health and safety point of view, we knew it was going to be a nightmare.

We were going out there to film with the mountain Search and Rescue unit, MOSAR.

We knew they'd be put in situations that were incredibly dangerous.

In fact, the producer director of the shooting, producer director that went up there had to face really intense conditions.

He climbed up the mountain with the team the night before the exercise.

And as he started going up the mountains, his first time climbing,

it started raining and it rained intensely for hours.

Down at base, we had no way of contacting him.

And frankly we were really really quite worried.

We knew that he'd get access to signal every now and then,

but most of the time when we tried to call him, we couldn't get hold of him.

I stressed incredibly and then I suddenly realised he was out there with the professionals.

That he was going to be fine.

Anything happened, at least he was with the best people possible.

Getting the coverage as well was very challenging.

Just being able to set up cameras in the helicopters so that we could get all the action right from the mountain

follow it right when the victims would be taken away, meant preparing days before.

We had to set up the cameras in the helicopters 2 days before filming

because the helicopters actually flew in from Kota Kinabalu.

We also had to make sure we covered lots and lots of different posts

because we weren't sure where the action was going to happen.

So it did involve huge amounts of preparation.

It was a baptism of fire.

But the crew did a great job, we got some great results.

And I knew at that moment that whatever Borneo threw at us, we'd be okay.

For more infomation >> Behind the Camera: Mountain Search & Rescue | Frontier Borneo S01E06 - Duration: 2:24.

-------------------------------------------

Schmidt Has Some Huge News! | Season 6 Ep. 22 | NEW GIRL - Duration: 1:11.

Hey, babe.

I'm back.

What's, uh-- what's happening?

I'm pregnant.

What?

I mean, you're pregnant.

We're pregnant.

Sadie called you.

And Jess picked up.

And then she called again, and Winston picked up.

Winston told me.

It's an upsetting scene, but, um, we're having a baby, Cece.

I wanted to buy you flowers, but I couldn't

pick out which ones, so--

We're having a a baby.

We're having a baby.

We're having a baby.

I really didn't think it was gonna happen for us.

It's a [inaudible] miracle.

[laughter]

For more infomation >> Schmidt Has Some Huge News! | Season 6 Ep. 22 | NEW GIRL - Duration: 1:11.

-------------------------------------------

Katsumoto and Nathan Algren ''The Final Battle Part-1'' - The Last Samurai-(2003) Movie Clip HD - Duration: 5:06.

Fire!

Ready!

Aim!

Fire!

Fire at will!

Vring up the new guns!

Prepare the new guns!

Fire!

Vackward!

Quickly! Quickly!

Fire!

Stop firing!

ldiots, keep on firing!

Stop firing! Stop!

No.

Shoot! Kill Katsumoto! Kill the American!

For more infomation >> Katsumoto and Nathan Algren ''The Final Battle Part-1'' - The Last Samurai-(2003) Movie Clip HD - Duration: 5:06.

-------------------------------------------

9 Great Ways to Tell If You Are Becoming a Wise and Mature Soul - Duration: 5:59.

9 Great Ways to Tell If You Are Becoming a Wise and Mature Soul

By consciousreminder

As anybody who is reaching or has already reached middle age will know, age and maturity

are not the same things.

There are lots of people in the world who simply don�t know how to develop and mature,

even as the years add up.

It can be an alluring prospect at times.

Getting older is scary and acting the fool is one way of putting it off.

However, we�ve all got to settle down and work out what we want from life at some point.

Otherwise, existence can feel a little rootless and untethered.

So, if you�re getting older and you want some confirmation that you�ve �grown up�

successfully, keep an eye out for those little signs that can tell you all about who you

are.

You Feel a Little Aimless

This is often the first stage of growing up, whether you�re twenty-five or fifty-five.

We all feel cast adrift sometimes; like we don�t know where we�re supposed to be.

It is a natural feeling that comes with the realisation that you�re part of a very big

world.

The trick is not to fight it, but to embrace your soul maturity and seek the things that

make you happy.

Your Patience Abounds

One of the clearest signs of soul maturity is increased patience and tolerance.

You�ve simply learned that not everything has to be done at a tearing speed.

There is great joy to be had in the journey, not just the destination.

Individuals with a mature soul take their time getting to know new people.

They don�t stress out over minor irritations.

And they enjoy their downtime.

You Are More Sensitive

Yet, on the flipside, you�re probably growing more sensitive.

This happens because you�re opening yourself up to people more and letting go of all those

old barriers.

You fear rejection less, so you don�t build up defences.

The consequence is likely to be a little more investment in things; emotions, relationships,

possessions, adventures.

You�ll cry more easily, but it won�t always be because you�re unhappy.

Forgiveness Is Easy

People with a mature soul are always open to forgiveness.

They understand that grudges hurt more than just their intended target.

They are a form of self-flagellation in a way and they encourage you to hold on to painful

feelings.

Learning how to let go is valuable because you�re not really letting go of anything

helpful or useful.

You�re gaining in lightness and inner calm by relinquishing grudges.

You Don�t Need Approval

One of the signs of soul maturity is a reduced dependence on external approval.

In other words, you�re not constantly looking for compliments as a way to validate your

existence.

You know that you�re valuable, because of the things that you do and the relationships

that you keep.

Your worth is more than what other people can give to you, as it starts with your own

approval.

People with a strong, healthy sense of self-perception find it easier to make decisions, take risks,

and grab opportunities.

You Are Willing To Be Vulnerable

Coming to terms with the fact that we�re not fully in control of our own lives is a

hard lesson.

However, it gets easier with age, because there is satisfaction to be had from the understanding

that nothing is certain.

You may not be able to influence every aspect of your existence, but this means that amazing,

exciting things could happen to you that you haven�t even thought to imagine yet.

Your Relationships Are Special

Soul maturity means knowing when to let toxic relationships go, be they lovers, friends,

or family members.

Life isn�t about how many friends you can have.

It is much more valuable to have a small number of reliable, dependable acquaintances who

are as devoted to you as you are them.

Surround yourself with light, happy, inspiring people.

Don�t spend time with anybody who uses your weaknesses for their own gain or doesn�t

encourage you to be your best self.

You Are Addicted to Learning

The most mature souls can�t get enough of knowledge.

They want to consume as much learning as possible and drink the world in as hungrily as they

can manage.

This makes them creative, imaginative, and fun to be around.

It helps them to find focus in life and increases their empathy and understanding for others.

You�ll never see a mature soul turning down the chance to gain knowledge through books,

documentaries, languages, travel, or new hobbies.

You Want to Leave a Mark

The most important indication of a truly mature soul is the desire to leave something behind.

You know that life is fleeting and your own is just a tiny seed in a big plant pot, so

you�re willing to look beyond it.

Whether it�s volunteering, designing a new product, becoming a mentor, or just creating

something that will last; you can leave your mark.

A keenness to do so shows that

you are a wise and developed old soul.

For more infomation >> 9 Great Ways to Tell If You Are Becoming a Wise and Mature Soul - Duration: 5:59.

-------------------------------------------

Full Episode: Earthquake revisited | Frontier Borneo S01E06 - Duration: 22:41.

(Bornean Language) The victim is experiencing terrible blood loss.

When they deliver it by bite, it's hazardous.

Nice and slow, very careful!

Borneo.

Nature's ultimate treasure trove.

Here new species are discovered every month.

But this is no tranquil paradise.

From the highest peaks,

to the lowest waves,

battles are waged daily.

Men and women risk their lives

fighting for this unique world,

forging a better future.

Yeah, there it goes!

This is Frontier Borneo.

At over 4000 metres, Mt Kinabalu is the tallest summit in Borneo.

Its spectacular views and bio-diversity attracts visitors from around the world.

To locals, this is where the souls of their elders reside after death.

Run, run, run!

But this veneration offers no protection when the mountain roars.

In June 2015, a devastating earthquake killed 18 people, including 6 children.

Now there's an action plan to make the mountain safer in future disasters.

(Bornean Language) Make sure the stretcher is carried by MOSAR

MOSAR is the authorities' new secret weapon

Now go! Go go. Hold!

- a specialised Mountain Search and Rescue unit.

Some of its members are guides and porters who survived the quake.

Back then, they had no training nor life-saving skills.

They responded bravely, but a lack of preparation left them reeling.

It's very hard for me. Two of my friends were killed that time.

But now they are being transformed into an elite life-saving squad.

Tomorrow they'll face their final test – the largest rescue simulation ever performed in Sabah.

Faster, faster!

And Nuhairi has gone from guide to MOSAR team leader.

This is his team's last practise before the rescue test begins tomorrow.

18 of May – Test day.

A legion of emergency services are standing by.

Their mission is to rescue 40 hikers injured by earthquake triggered landslides.

Everyone is under pressure.

This may be an exercise

but the treacherous terrain leaves no room for error.

Almost 7 kilometres up the mountain, Nuhairi's MOSAR team comes across its first casualty.

They'll only pass this test by treating it as a real crisis.

A helicopter evacuation is required.

But the most accessible landing pad is at the bottom of this cliff.

So the team must lower the victim over the edge.

One wrong move, and this rescue rehearsal could cost real lives.

Lying off the Eastern coast of Sabah, is the paradise of PomPom Island.

But below the waves lurk an ugly truth.

Bomb fishing has turned the reef…to rubble.

A small group is planning to change that.

I just want to run through the safety briefing, make sure we all know where we're gonna be,

and how we're gonna do this carefully and in control.

Their solution is an alphabet of concrete blocks!

Both of it, so the, the "F" is floating.

Leading the initiative - Marine biologist Hazel Oakley.

We don't want anybody anywhere near it when its swinging like that.

We're a long way from Semporna Hospital. So everybody be careful.

A 200-kilogram block in freefall could easily crush a limb.

Satu dua tiga (1, 2, 3)

But the risk comes with high rewards.

They believe this is the beginning of the reef's resurrection.

The rough, stable surface will allow corals to settle and grow.

And this block is now ready for deployment.

TRACC has created smaller artificial reefs from salvage materials like glass bottles

that have been a success in attracting small fish.

As we've got the small fish, the big fish have started to move in,

and of course, the more habitat for bigger fish we can provide,

the more bigger fish we'll have.

And that's what these big reef structures are for, the big holes attract the bigger predators.

A team of divers will guide the block to the planned drop site.

But it's hanging too low in the water. Below it - a coral nursery.

I'm a little bit apprehensive. This is a big piece of cement.

If the letter hits these growing reefs, it could destroy years of work.

Finally, they can take a deep breath.

But it's not the team's day.

The wind direction shifts and the block has to be dragged back into position.

It's difficult, you know, to get exactly the right place where the letter got to be dropped.

In these tough conditions, coordination is key.

The boat has to be in the perfect spot or the slab could be swept away by strong currents.

Anchor!

Ok, we're ready to cut.

It's a delicate moment.

The weight of the concrete could overturn or even sink the boat.

Hold it carefully.

Over to the Southwest in Sarawak.

At the Matang Wildlife Centre,

Director of Veterinary Medicine Leo Biddle has a very special guest.

Our first job

is catching the slow fellow.

A Sunda slow loris.

They're one of the most ancient and primitive primate species found in Borneo.

But its charming looks have made it a favourite with illegal pet traders.

The Slow Loris is no cuddly toy.

It's the world's only poisonous primate. Its bite can cause death by anaphylactic shock.

Gotcha!

Glands by its elbows produce a toxin which the Slow Loris licks.

That smell- that is the secretion. Whatever toxin that's being secreted,

it mixes with their saliva. When they deliver it by bite, it's hazardous.

The Loris needs extra careful handling.

He was severely injured when he was rescued 3 months ago.

We want to put them out, but we want to put them out responsibly and be sure that they survive.

Leo is performing a full health check.

To avoid stressing the animal, Leo places him in a bag with anesthetic gas.

This guy's definitely feeling an effect and he should be unconscious at any moment.

Now, Leo will have to work fast.

He needs to complete the health check before the Loris wakes up.

I'm just checking to see if there's any injuries.

As much as Leo wants this Loris back in the wild, he needs to ensure this creature is in perfect shape.

PomPom Island, Sabah.

The Tropical Research and Conservation Centre's team is wrestling with a 200-kilogram concrete block.

They hope this will form the basis for a new coral reef.

Ok we ready to cut.

Ready!

It's crunch point.

If Hazel has miscalculated, cutting the rope to the stabilizing floats could capsize their boat.

The divers position themselves.

But conditions are working against them.

A strong current is now running.

I'm concerned with my team being caught up in this current as long as they aren't attached to the bottom,

they are swimming against it which is exhausting.

Quitting now could be just as dangerous, so Hazel holds her nerve.

We ok on the boat?

Ok.

We're ready to cut the second barrel.

Oops. There she goes.

The weight of the concrete now rests almost entirely on the boat.

It has to be gently lowered to the seabed.

Remember, nice and slow, very careful.

Positioning is key,

as this is only one piece of a larger reef structure.

Slowly.

One rope is too short.

Bouncing off the bottom could crack the block.

The surface team is alerted.

Finally, it's down. And still in one piece.

Once pins are hammered in to secure its position, the job is done.

As more letters are deployed the team hopes the corals and fish will return.

And PomPom will regain a vibrant marine life.

At Mount Kinabalu – the MOSAR unit is undertaking their ultimate test.

These men have trained for a year in search and rescue tactics to prepare for today.

Everybody stop!

As they lower a victim down the rock face, team leader Nuhairi knows the danger is real.

The last time he helped someone down these slopes was a year ago – when a giant quake killed 18 people.

Boleh, boleh. (Can, can.)

This time the rescue effort is lightyears ahead.

But they still only have minutes to rush the victim to the helipad.

Go go go!

Reports of more casualties are coming in, so this is just the beginning.

Down at base, the paramedic unit is preparing for the worst.

In charge is Dr Grace Yong.

This is our disaster tent. It is supposed to be set up within 10 minutes.

The medic tent is erected just in time to accept the casualties.

They are going to the non-critical zone to get their basic vital signs and then move them out as soon as possible.

The first patient arrives and his condition is critical.

So far vitals?

The medics are trained to respond as they would in a real-life emergency.

It is important even though it's just a drill, it's supposed to examine as what we usually practise.

As more casualties' stream in, Grace must calm the chaos.

Vital signs fine.

Ah vital signs stable.

Thousands of metres above the paramedic tent, Nuhairi's team must deal with another critical injury.

The patient needs urgent attention, so Nuhairi opts to airlift again.

Nuhairi is worried as cloud cover is closing in fast.

His fears prove right.

Poor visibility has grounded the chopper.

Nuhairi's casualty may not survive this wait.

He must act fast.

In a simulated emergency on Mount Kinabalu, a critically injured casualty is stranded.

Dense cloud cover has grounded all rescue choppers.

Team leader Nuhairi makes a drastic call.

The earthquake simulation's target is to get all victims down the mountain by 2pm.

Most climbers take around 4 hours to walk down the 4.3 kilometre track.

But the elite MOSAR units have been trained to do it in under 2.

Okay, move now.

At the base, Dr Grace has been co-coordinating the treatment for all the casualties.

Bed tu yang mana? (Which bed is that?)

As the last few patients are dispatched to hospital she notices that something is amiss.

A casualty is missing – Nuhairi's patient.

The deadline to complete the exercise is fast approaching.

So we're still waiting for updates from them.

Aini.

The team has to hurry up.

Finally, Nuhairi's unit reach the triage station.

And they did it within the time limit.

The last year of training has paid off.

Need splint?

Yea need splinting now.

We finished head count.

When the quake hit in 2015, Nuhairi felt helpless – but today he stands proud.

Kinabalu is now safer, with MOSAR standing watch.

Medical director Leo Biddle must race to complete a health check

on a Slow loris before its anesthesia wears off.

There seems to be no problems there, no abrasions or anything like that.

Not a minute too soon.

So the normal resting heart rate of Lorises is between 180 to 200.

The reason the heart rate is so high here is because it's just waking up.

Only one essential step left to go.

The tracking collar will allow Leo to monitor the location of the Loris in the wild for 6 months -

useful information for future releases.

Leo hopes this is the last time that this animal will ever be caged.

Come on buddy.

It's now 1AM, and the Loris is wide awake.

This is the best time to release this nocturnal creature.

He'll have until dawn to find a safe place in the forest.

The Loris is hesitant.

But then the forest calls.

A lot of people think you just open cage doors and animals run off back to living happily ever after,

but the jungle can be quite a fierce place.

Full of danger, especially if you're a slow loris.

It's probably just a little bit overwhelmed at the moment.

Returning this creature to the wild is a victory – but Leo is realistic.

It could well be that one of the owls, or eagles, or the snakes that we've released here previously might eat the Loris.

But that is part of the natural cycle.

What is not natural is finding it in people's houses, in pet shops.

And it's not natural for them to be sitting in cages in my office.

Until the illegal pet trade stops many of these creatures won't be so lucky.

But at least this Loris has another chance at living free.

For more infomation >> Full Episode: Earthquake revisited | Frontier Borneo S01E06 - Duration: 22:41.

-------------------------------------------

Katsumoto's Death ''The Final Battle Part-2'' - The Last Samurai-(2003) Movie Clip HD - Duration: 5:07.

Stop firing!

ldiots, keep on firing!

Stop firing! Stop!

No.

Shoot! Kill Katsumoto! Kill the American!

You have your honor again.

Let me die with mine.

Help me up.

Are you ready?

l will miss our conversations.

Perfect.

They are all...

... perfect.

For more infomation >> Katsumoto's Death ''The Final Battle Part-2'' - The Last Samurai-(2003) Movie Clip HD - Duration: 5:07.

-------------------------------------------

Dangerous criminals escape from jail - Duration: 3:00.

For more infomation >> Dangerous criminals escape from jail - Duration: 3:00.

-------------------------------------------

You Have 4 Kinds Of Soul Mates Here's How To Recognize Each One - Duration: 7:05.

You Have 4 Kinds Of Soul Mates. Here�s How To Recognize Each One

�A true soul mate is probably the most important person you�ll ever meet, because they tear

down your walls and smack you awake. But to live with a soul mate forever? Nah. Too painful.

Soul mates, they come into your life just to reveal another layer of yourself to you,

and then leave.� � Elizabeth Gilbert

You find a soul mate, or a spiritual partner, when you least expect it. Soul mates are the

people who mirror you, make you aware of your repetitive patterns, and propel you forward

on your journey. Being more aware of the different types of soul mate relationships you�ll

encounter in life can help us take advantage of those opportunities and develop deeper

connections. Below are four types of soul mates I�ve identified:

1. Healing soul mates

These are friends who arrive with intention and provide you with life lessons that clear

blocks from your past by mirroring you. Healing soul mates show up by divine timing � exactly

when we most need to learn what they have to teach.

These friends help us learn how to move forward. A healing friendship exists only as long as

your purposes are aligned.

How do you recognize one?

When the relationship or friendship escalates fast. This type of friend usually shows up

when you are dealing with repetitive patterns and attempting to work through old issues.

How do you nurture this relationship?

Know up front that this friendship might not last. Like all relationships, it only works

if the two of you can respect each other�s need for space and come together with understanding

at other times. The intense bond can be redolent of a sibling or romantic relationship. The

friendship may have lots of ups and downs, but if you can take the good with the bad,

this type of relationship will be very fruitful.

2. Past-life soul mates

Because these people might have been a lover or soul mate in a past life, the relationships

feel easy and comfortable. The connection is instant. You might feel like you will be

friends forever � no matter how much time passes or how far apart you are geographically

� and you�re probably right. This friendship will likely last for a lifetime because you

will never want to run or hide from these friends.

These relationships can be carefree, but they also shape us. They teach us to trust and

believe in ourselves. In this dynamic, both people feel comfortable telling each other

anything. Nothing is off limits. You are accepted for who you are.

These are the friends who help you grow into the person you�re meant to be, and have

the special ability to propel you toward your destiny without pain or suffering. Often,

we try to turn these relationships romantic, but it is usually impossible. There�s a

lack of physical attraction or a desire to sustain and protect your friendship.

How do you recognize one?

You meet this type of person when you�re truly being yourself. Past-life soul mates

appear when you�re in your element and you don�t hold anything back. They always have

your best interests at heart and will stop at nothing when asked to help you accomplish

your dreams. This type of friendship will last a lifetime.

How do you nurture this relationship?

Stay connected. Check in by email or phone, just to say you�re thinking of them. These

people come in and out of your life when you need to be directed, and they always bring

love and fun. They help bring you back to your inner desires and reconnect you with

your abilities. They are crucial in shaping you into the best person you can be.

3. Karmic soul mates

These people, too, are connected to you through a past life. These connections are deep and

karmic, and often painful, as they involve ego struggles. Ego pain must be endured, because

it is the point. Working through the relationship and learning to overcome suffering is often

the only resolution.

How do you recognize one?

Karmic soul mates have a twinlike connection. In times of intense emotion, you actually

feel what they feel. Often, these mates have been reincarnated and are reliving some karma

to break a negative cycle.

How do you nurture this relationship?

Be aware of the energy you emit, and do your best to remove your ego. If you focus on the

positive aspects of the relationship, you will draw positivity from this person. Remove

your ego by focusing on what is best for the both of you. Do your best to give unconditional

love and understanding to your partner. Unconditional kindness will make your soul mate feel at

ease.

4. Twin flames

Twin flames work together to overcome emotional and spiritual barriers. They can talk for

hours without running out of things to say. They think alike, finish each other�s sentences,

and naturally do things as a pair. This relationship transcends the ego.

When you meet a twin flame, you get a sense of wholeness from the relationship. Not everyone

meets their twin flame as a lover, but those who do will enjoy this relationship for the

rest of their lives.

How do you recognize one?

You�ll feel like you have known the other person for many lifetimes, and you will rarely

want to be apart. Before long, twin flames start to make collective decisions on everything.

How do you nurture this relationship?

The most important aspect of a twin flame relationship is honesty, but relating to your

twin flame feels natural and easy. You can probably easily communicate even without words.

When both are completely themselves, twin flames can overcome anything.

Every one of these relationships has the potential to end in heartbreak, but each one is also

an opportunity to resolve and change your relationship karma. Every relationship that

you learn from, and end by moving forward with love, can be marked as a success. It

doesn�t have to last

forever to serve its purpose.

For more infomation >> You Have 4 Kinds Of Soul Mates Here's How To Recognize Each One - Duration: 7:05.

-------------------------------------------

Oggy and the Cockroaches Cartoons New collection 2017 Part 06 - Duration: 28:20.

For more infomation >> Oggy and the Cockroaches Cartoons New collection 2017 Part 06 - Duration: 28:20.

-------------------------------------------

Saturated Fat is Healthy?? - Silly Meat Eater Comments #5 (Remastered Edition) - Duration: 12:18.

1) Our first comment is from Alexander G who had this to say...

This argument has always perplexed me.

Is it better to live a short life of torment, fear and death, or not live at all?

Perhaps others will have a different opinion, however i would not want to live at all.

If we look back in history when slaves were brought over from Africa to the new world,

there was a high rate of death on these ships from disease and suicide.

These once free men and women, coming to grips with their future as property chose to end

it all.

You can find it even in today's society, especially in the LGBT community, where children

and teens are bullied by their peers to such an extent that they find escape only through

ending their lives.

We also see it in the highly debated physician-assisted suicides, where terminally ill patients in

tremendous pain and anguish wish to die early.

We can clearly see that when we talk about humans and suffering we can see, right or

wrong, a willingness to end ones own life to end suffering, yet when it comes to other

animals, of the non-human variety, we seem to protect our desire for flesh and the continuation

of exploitation of the animals life and body.

On to this supposed self-righteousness that vegans are often accused of.

Sure there are asshole vegans and vegetarians, but don't kid yourself, you have a healthy

supply of them in the general public too.

Do you go around accusing people who are against racisim as "Self-righteous"?

How would you feel if a person who thinks that slavery or racisim or sexism is a good

thing came up to you accused you of being self-righteous because you believe that these

beliefs are morally wrong?

People are extremely sensitive regarding their personal lifestyle choices, everything from

diet, weight, smoking, religion, politics and fashion, if anyone makes a critical comment

regarding any of these topics the gloves come off.

If the critical comment pertains to moral and immoral behaviour, the tolerance level

drops off the scale.

Nobody likes their actions and habits criticized because nearly everyone has a high opinion

of themselves, and their beliefs are part of their identity.

Human history is fraught with immoral beliefs, held by people who defended them tooth and

nail.

Veganism requires an examination of many of our daily choices.

Everything from what we choose to put in our mouth 3 times or more a day, to what kind

of clothing and furniture we buy.

I couldnt care less what you think of me as a person, as my vegan activism is motivated

by justice and NOT any self-centred ego masterbation.

2) Our second comment is from C SamsZee who said...

CSamszee starts off with the identical argument that our previous commenter did, so i will

not repeat myself here again.

Onto his support of supposedly free range animal products that he feels give the animals

the best life possible.

Firstly, the best life possible would be one where the animal is not human property.

The animal's life, relationships, choice of home, freedom of movement belongs to the

animal him or herself.

Many of the animals we have domesticated to eat were descendant from animals that roamed

vast tracks of land, and chose who they interacted with and who they mated with.

No animal farming operation today can fully recreate a truly free life for farmed animals

and remain profitable.

Secondly, this fantasy of "free range" is more about marketing than about any real

animal welfare improvements.

The term "free range" has no legal meaning, and no government regulation.

The same applies to terms like "cage free" or "humanely raised".

These terms are more about making people feel better about consuming animal products and

thereby increase sales and profits, and less about any concern for the animals.

And Thirdly, we do not need to eat animals to be healthy.

The issue should not be about How we treat animals, but rather should be focused on Why

we use them at all.

We have no nutritional requirement to eat other animals, and we can be perfectly healthy

on a fully vegan diet, then what justification do we have for enslaving and killing even

well treated animals?

If its wrong to harm animals unnecessarily, this would surely include instances where

we harm animals for fun or pleasure.

Is that not the primary reason why we allow 56+ billion animals killed each year? for

palate pleasure?

On to the comment regarding dairy.

In order for dairy cows to produce milk, they must be made pregnant.

This results in a baby calf.

Some of these calfs are raised to be future dairy cows, while many others end up in the

meat industry as veal.

When the dairy cow's milk supply begins to diminish she is sent off to slaughter to

be made into burgers or pet food.

Dairy cows live longer, torturous lives, with infected utters, have their young ones taken

away from them and than slaughtered all the same.

If forced with violence, i would sooner eat a steak than consume dairy, as there is more

suffering in a glass of milk than in a piece of meat.

3)Next we have a comment from je187u who said...

You may not care much about other sentient non-human animals, but some people, like myself

do.

Its not that I care less for humans and more for animals, i care for all animals regardless

of their species.

My reasons to go vegan are primarily regarding the moral argument, but there are very strong

cases to be made that being vegan is also generally healthier, better for the environment

and the health of the planet, and better for humans as a social matter.

The reason i focus my attention and videos on the plight of non-human animals is that

i see a lack of attention on this issue.

There are multi-million dollar charities across the whole planet working on human issues,

and comparatively few working on issues that relate to non-human animals.

As a vegan I realize that its not only about the animals we enslave and kill for food,

but its also part of a larger social justice movement.

Fighting to end slavery, end discrimination, improve the rights of minorities, women's

rights, are issues of justice and fairness, and It is the time to extend our fight to

the rights of sentient beings outside our species.

Im not suggesting that cows should have the right to vote, or chickens the right to hold

office, I'm fighting for the one right to not be solely the property of another.

As property, animals do not have the right to their own bodies, and their owners have

the legal right to terminate them at any point for any reason.

It is my contention that we should fight to end the property status of animals and to

join with other social justice issues to combat discrimination based upon irrelevant criteria,

irrespective of species.

4) trucker9358 wanted to inform us that...

As an atheist, i do not believe in gods due to the entire lack of evidence to justify

belief.

For that reason, the bible holds no authority to me as it is just another book that makes

grand claims that cannot be verified to be true.

Quoting passages from its pages to defend animal exploitation is utterly a waste of

time because i couldn't care less what it has to say.

The morality of a society 2000 years ago has little bearing on my worldview today.

If i were to accept certain passages in the bible as true, than i would have to hold views

on slavery, rape, genocide, murder and science that i am not prepared to have.

My worldview is far more morally centred than anything contained within the bible, quran

or the torah.

5)And rounding of the list this week is a comment from moonbeamrider1 who said...

I am by no means a health professional, and at best i can direct you to more qualified

people, however this nonsense regarding the health benefits of saturated fat is horrible

advice is dangerous and unethical.

The Paleo diet, a group of people who strive to eat the diet of the cavemen, proclaim that

saturated fat is beneficial, yet these claims are in the face of hundreds of studies to

the contrary.

Saturated fats, primarily found in animal products, have been deemed unsafe and the

suggestion of all leading health organizations and health professionals is to reduce or eliminate

it from one's diet.

Medical, heart-health, and governmental authorities, such as the World Health Organization,[7]

the American Dietetic Association,[8] the Dietitians of Canada,[8] the British Dietetic

Association,[9] American Heart Association,[10] the British Heart Foundation,[11] the World

Heart Federation,[12] the British National Health Service,[13] the United States Food

and Drug Administration,[14] and the European Food Safety Authority[15] advise that saturated

fat is a risk factor for cardiovascular, which is the leading causes of death worldwide as

shown in this WHO graph.

There are a few authors making claims, however its more about making outrages claims to entice

book sales than to improve the health of an already unhealthy society.

POLL: There you have it.

5 stupid comments from 5 different youtubers.

Which comment would you vote to win the Dumbass of the week award?

Would it be:

1) Alexander G who thinks its better to live a life of torment than not to live at all

2) CSamszee who thinks that animals should live the best possible life, therefore he

eats free range 3) je187u thinks that you can care for humans

or animals, but not both 4) trucker9358 who gets his morality from

the bible or

5) moonbeamrider1 who thinks that all leading health organizations have it wrong and the

solution to heart disease is more saturated fat.

Please leave your votes and comments below, and if you enjoyed this video remember to

press the like button and share!

If you enjoyed this video, click the like button below.

To ensure you don't miss out on future content, click the subscribe button and bell to be

notified of new uploads.

Interested in atheist related videos?

Check out my other Youtube channel devoted to atheist and religious content.

Link is in the video description below.

Lastly, if you like the work that I do, and have a few bucks to spare, please consider

becoming a patron of the channel by supporting my Patreon project.

I am more then halfway to reaching my $100 a month goal.

Please help if you can!

Thank you for your ongoing support and as always thanks for watching.

For more infomation >> Saturated Fat is Healthy?? - Silly Meat Eater Comments #5 (Remastered Edition) - Duration: 12:18.

-------------------------------------------

UQx PSYC1030.1x 4-3-3 Part B: The role of facial expressions in communicating emotion - Duration: 3:23.

So, how can we tell the difference

between a real smile and a fake smile?

Many people say you can tell a real

smile by the eyes, but what you look for

in the eyes

it's hard to describe but if you break

it down sometimes people go well it's

the crow's feet wrinkles I guess.

Fake smiles,

you tend to smile with your mouth but

real smiles you tend to use a lot more

muscles in the face. You tend to bunch up the

cheeks okay this is a little bit

indulgent, this is a photo of my son.

That's a fake smile, now this one is a

genuine smile. I'm pretty sure you can

see the difference, if not focus on the

eyes. Now, where's sadness? There it is. In

cartoons or comics, sadness is

communicated with an upside down smile, a

downturned mouth. That's not what

people's mouths typically do when

they're sad.

In fact, it's not really communicated

through the mouth that much, sadness is

probably the hardest one to spot. It's

more in the eyes, the eyebrows.

It's one that people find quite hard to

spot.

I don't know from an evolutionary point

of view why? Because what we do know

about sadness what we know about

depression, is that having people around

you is hugely helpful.

Why are we not equipped to communicate

our sadness better then? You can see

little kids when they're trying to

communicate sadness they really amped it up.

They pout their lip, they do all sorts of

things that really communicate their

sadness. Adults, they're too cool to do

that so let's keep going.

This face shows disgust, you can see an

evolution function for this if there's

something toxic in the environment then

you should screw up your nose,

you should button your mouth up, you

don't want anything coming in.

Surprise, again you can see an evolutionary

function here. The eyebrows are wide open,

the eyebrows are high,

your eyes are wide open your mouth is

open. Why would you do that?

Well, it kind of makes sense. If something

novel is there in the environment and you have

to prepare for that fight-or-flight kind

of response be ready.

Big breath, eyes wide open, ready to go.

Fear is a little bit like surprised but

not as exaggerated. The eyes might not be

as wide and the mouth might not be as

open and the eyebrows not as high. Then

anger. Anger is often communicated

through the mouth, through the snarling

expression, but probably more through the

eyes. The eyes give us the death stare. If

you have to break down the death stare,

what is it? You know when you're getting

one. You don't have to think about it,

actually

when you break it down, its kind of

subtle. It's like you shorten your eyes,

you narrow your eyes a little bit. Not

much, probably millimeters for a short

time and you don't blink. You stare

directly at someone. Pretty subtle when

you think about it but really efficient

communication right? It can be difficult

to break down all of this because it

doesn't happen like that. It just tends to

happen instinctively. You know when

someone's giving you a death stare, you

know when someone's happy. You know when

someone's disgusted, you don't have to go

through what all of their face parts of

doing, what their eyes their mouth and

their nose are doing, you just know.

For more infomation >> UQx PSYC1030.1x 4-3-3 Part B: The role of facial expressions in communicating emotion - Duration: 3:23.

-------------------------------------------

UQx PSYC1030.3x 1-1-2 Part B: Common advice - Duration: 0:56.

So, of the different advice and comments given in the video, which, if any, do you think

is actually likely to be helpful to a person suffering from depression?

The advice about exercising is actually the only piece of advice that has any real merit

in helping someone experiencing depression, with research having shown that exercise can

be related to decreased symptoms of depression.

The rest of the advice is actually unlikely to be helpful.

I'd go further and suggest that, at least some of that advice might actually make someone

who is depressed feel even worse.

This is important because these comments are exactly the sorts of things that well-intentioned

people say to people suffering from depression or other kinds of mental illness.

For more infomation >> UQx PSYC1030.3x 1-1-2 Part B: Common advice - Duration: 0:56.

-------------------------------------------

UQx PSYC1030.1x 7-5-4 Part B: Self-regulation of eating - Duration: 2:58.

If you're eating and you see a pile of bones begin to mount in front of you, you have pretty

good feedback about the volume of food you've eaten.

In the 'all you can eat' study, when the wait staff was clearing away the bones, those

people didn't have any feedback.

So they ate about 20% more.

The pile of bones in front of you make you think, my goodness I must have eaten all these

wings, so maybe I should stop eating.

Another thing is that people also eat too much when they are sitting around the table

with their family and their friends because they are talking and enjoying the conversation

and they're not focusing on the eating.

I'm going to say from the research, if you really want to keep track of what you're

eating and control yourself, the best way to do it would be to sit in front of a mirror

and eat there looking at yourself.

I know nobody does that - but that would be the ideal.

You'd probably really enjoy the meal too you'd taste every bite and be totally aware

and you wouldn't overeat.

The point is monitoring is important and effective.

The third and final component of self-control is willpower.

It's a complicated thing and I won't go into all the dynamics of it now but it seems

like as the term willpower implies, people have a limited energy supply and so when they

exert their willpower then temporarily it is reduced or depleted until it recharges.

So, dieters, sure enough, when their willpower is low, they will eat more.

And it may be low because they've been resisting other temptations or could be low because

they've had a hard day at work or problems in their romantic relationships and other

things are draining their willpower or other challenges.

But whatever takes away their mental energy, then they don't have as much energy to resist.

So, low willpower undermines your ability to reduce your food intake.

There's also evidence when you are on a diet, you'll be less successful at quitting

smoking because smoking takes willpower and dieting takes willpower and if you try to

do both, you can't do these effectively as well.

When ordinary people, they don't necessarily eat more, in other words people who are not

dieting, don't necessarily eat more when their willpower is down because they're

not normally trying to inhibited it but dieters who are trying to restrain in their eating,

the energy for inhibition is down when their willpower

is weaker.

There is certainly a lot more we could say about the self but understanding self-esteem

and self-control are two of the important foundations of it.

And as I've said, we've invested a lot more energy in studying self-esteem but in

the last 20 years I think there's been a big shift to move more to self-control because

that ultimately has considerably more power to help individuals and help society.

For more infomation >> UQx PSYC1030.1x 7-5-4 Part B: Self-regulation of eating - Duration: 2:58.

-------------------------------------------

UQx PSYC1030.1x 2-2-2 Part B: Attitude behaviour relations - Duration: 6:15.

Ok, so what did Lapiere find?

Well, when they turned up at the various establishments, they were served by all but one establishment

- that's over 99% of establishments serving them.

Six months later, when LaPiere got in touch with the places they had visited and asked

whether they would serve them, it was a different story.

He received 128 responses, and only one restaurant, or less than 1%, said that they would serve

the Chinese guests.

Seven percent said, that whether they would serve them or not, would depend on the circumstances,

and 92%, said that they would not serve them.

So, that's a very small number saying that they would serve them.

That's the opposite of what they found when they actually turned up though!

So, the conclusion was that the attitudes and behaviours of the people working in these

places didn't match.

They served the three travellers when they turned up, but when asked in advance, they

said they would not serve them.

Subsequent research by Wicker in 1969 and others came to a similar conclusion about

the lack of a relationship between attitudes and behaviour.

People have criticised this initial conclusion for a number of reasons, however.

One of the main issues pointed out is that LaPiere was not necessarily measuring the

attitudes and behaviours of the same people.

The person who served them when they turned up at the establishment was not necessarily

the same person who replied when LaPiere talked to them six months later.

So maybe it's not so surprising that the attitudes and behaviours were so different

- he was measuring one person's behaviour and maybe another person's attitude.

Later research has suggested that sometimes attitudes can predict behaviours, but it's

somewhat complicated.

Part of the reason the early research didn't find a strong relationship between attitudes

and behaviour was because of how people were measuring both of these things.

You've seen how LaPiere got it wrong by measuring attitudes and behaviours of different

people.

It also matters how you measure attitudes and behaviours, even if you are actually measuring

them for the same person.

You need to measure attitudes and behaviour in the same way, and in the same amount of

detail.

What I mean by this is, if you want to know if people will recycle for example, it's

probably not a good idea to measure their attitude towards saving the environment.

This is because we have a relatively specific behaviour, which is recycling, and we're

measuring a general attitude, which is saving the environment.

According to Fishbein and Ajzen, who published this paper in 1974, attitudes and behaviour

will be related when they are measured in the same way.

They called this the Principle of compatibility.

The idea is that you need to measure attitudes and behaviours in a way that is similar or

compatible.

To do this, they said you need to take into account four things.

The target, or focus of the behaviour.

The action, the behaviour itself.

The time, which is when the behaviour is enacted.

And finally, the context, or situation that the behaviour is enacted in.

For example, if we are interested in measuring the relationship between attitudes towards

recycling and recycling behaviour, compatible measures might look like this:

To measure attitudes, we would ask "To what extent do you support recycling all paper,

tins, and plastic over the next two weeks in your home?",

And two weeks later, to measure behaviour we could ask "Over the last two weeks, to

what extent did you recycle all paper, tins, and plastic in your home?"

The Target is 'all paper, tins, and plastic'.

The Action is 'recycling'.

The Time is 'over the next or last two weeks'.

And the Context is 'in your home'.

According to the Principle of Compatibility, we would expect that a specific attitude,

such as the one we just gave in that example, will predict a single behaviour better than

a general attitude (Davidson & Jaccard, 1979).

We would also predict that if we use a general attitude measure, such as "Do you think saving

the environment is a good thing?", then this will predict what we call a general behavioural

index, which is really just collection of behaviours (Weigel & Newman, 1976).

So, we might measure recycling, but also how much water they save, whether they try to

use public transport instead of drive, and other behaviours to help to save the environment.

Another reason for why attitudes sometimes are not very good predictors of behaviour

is because other variables can become important in the relationship between attitudes and

behaviour.

For example, social norms also contribute to behaviour.

I'm sure you can think about a time when you thought one thing, but your friends had

a different attitude.

You might not have behaved in the way that your attitude would suggest, but instead went

along with your friends so that you fit in.

To further complicate things, the link between hearing a persuasive message and changing

your behaviour is not so simple and involves many steps.

For example, in McGuire's Chain of Persuasion Model, after someone sends persuasive message

in your direction, you have to attend to the message, and then comprehend the message,

before you can change your attitude and yield to the message, but then you still have to

retain that message in memory to be able to act on it.

So, all of those steps have to happen successfully for a persuasive message to have an effect

on your behaviour.

If any one of them doesn't happen, then there's no behaviour change.

So, you can see, while attitudes do relate to behaviours, it's a complicated relationship.

And we need careful research to fully understand how attitudes and behaviours will be related

in any particular context.

For more infomation >> UQx PSYC1030.1x 2-2-2 Part B: Attitude behaviour relations - Duration: 6:15.

-------------------------------------------

UQx PSYC1030.1x 3-5-3 Part B: Milgrims study - Duration: 2:40.

Now one thing that I actually forgot to mention, is they're not actually getting the shocks.

So, the learner is a confederate, they're not really in pain.

But that doesn't matter because the teacher doesn't know that.

The teacher thinks that they're giving potential lethal shocks to a stranger.

Before they did the study, they went to the experts and said, "How many people do you

think are going to go all the way?"

They were like, "I bet you no one, like 1 in 1,000, like the sadists, the freaks,

the psychos."

Well that wasn't the case at all.

All the people went to the intense shock level, and nearly two-thirds of people went all the

way.

You might be looking at this going, "That's kind of a horrible reflection of human nature.

Does that mean that most humans are actually psychos?

We're not nice people?

We're sadistic?"

Well, that wasn't the conclusion at all that Milgram came to.

Instead, he reported how upset and distressed the participants became.

He said he observed one mature and initially poised businessman enter the lab smiling and

confident, but within 20 minutes he was reduced to a twitching, stuttering wreck.

He was approaching a point of nervous collapse.

He constantly pulled on his earlobe and twisted his hands, at one point pushed his fist into

his forehead and muttered, "God, let's stop it!"

Yet he continued to respond to every word of the experimenter and obeyed until the end.

There is footage of people crying doing this experiment.

They're not giving potentially lethal shocks to strangers because they're horrible sadistic

people.

They're doing it because they're nice people.

They're doing it because they're polite people, and they find it hard to say no to

the authority figure in the white lab coat.

This experiment had a massive impact all around the world because people were trying to make

sense of the Holocaust.

How can it be that a whole nation of people conspired in the murder of millions and millions

of people, identified by the Nazi's as being Jewish, homosexual or disabled?

The standard explanation was, "Well, the Nazis are evil.

It's the evil gene."

That's all you kind of needed to know: They thought that Germany was a nation full of

morally corrupt people.

What Milgram is trying to say is, "No, we all have the capacity to behave in evil ways

if the situation demands it."

The author C.P. Snow said, "When you think of the long and gloomy history of man, you'll

find more hideous crimes have been committed in the name of obedience than in the name

of rebellion."

This is the kind of stuff he's talking about.

For more infomation >> UQx PSYC1030.1x 3-5-3 Part B: Milgrims study - Duration: 2:40.

-------------------------------------------

UQx PSYC1030.1x 3-4-4 Part B: Conformity - Duration: 4:20.

So why would people conform with the group when the group was clearly wrong?

Well some of the participants who conformed a lot thought that they themselves must be

wrong, so they relied on the group to give them more accurate information about what

they were seeing.

This is called informational influence.

Some even thought that seeing things differently from the rest of the group meant that there

was something wrong with themselves as a person more generally, so they tried to hide the

fact that they saw things differently.

These people wanted to avoid being ridiculed or socially sanctioned.

This is called normative influence.

Others didn't want to spoil the results of the study.

And some even realised that the group might be wrong or "sheep" following the leader,

or perhaps even suffering from an optical illusion, but they went along with the incorrect

response anyway.

Interestingly, the people who conformed tended to underestimate the extent to which they

conformed.

So, what else is important in producing this conformity?

Well the size of the group mattered.

So, on this graph, we've got the number of errors that people make on the y-axis,

as a percentage.

So, the more errors, the more they are conforming to the group's incorrect response.

On the x-axis, we have the number of other people in the group.

There was little conformity when there was only one other confederate.

As you can see on this figure, when the group consisted of just the real participant and

one confederate, there was almost no conformity.

When there were two confederates, conformity increased to 13.6% of the incorrect trials.

When there was a majority of three, it increased again to 31.8%.

After this, the rate of conformity did not increase so much.

Conformity was also reduced when participants were able to give their responses in private

so that the rest of the group couldn't see their answer.

Likewise, when there was at least one other person who disagreed with the group's incorrect

answer, conformity went down again.

Having another person disagree with the group's answer, even if they disagreed with the actual

participant as well, also helped to reduce the effect of the group to only 25% of what

it was before.

Interestingly, the pressure for conformity has a bigger effect in some cultures compared

to others.

Smith and Bond conducted a meta-analysis (Bond & Smith, 1996).

A meta-analysis is a type of study where you look at a large number of previous studies

and compare the size of the effect of something like conformity, and see how it changes as

a function of other factors.

This helps us to get an idea about how big an effect is, how consistent it is, and what

sorts of things influence it.

What Smith and Bond did is look at a large number of studies using the Asch paradigm

that we've just described, and these studies came from a range of samples in different

cultures.

There were studies from the United States of America that were conducted by Asch (1955),

other studies from the USA conducted by other researchers, studies conducted in other Western

cultures, and also studies conducted in non-Western cultures.

So here are their results.

On the y-axis is the size of the conformity effect.

Bigger numbers mean more conformity.

The sample type is on the x-axis.

The circle indicates the average size of the effect, and the lines above and below the

circle are how much variation there is in the size of the effect.

The larger the lines above and below the mean, the more differences there were in the amount

of conformity for studies in those samples.

That's a lot to take in, but it's actually quite a simple conclusion.

What they found (Bond & Smith, 1996) was that North American and Western European participants

generally conformed less than those participants from Eastern cultures.

And this may reflect the nature of socially appropriate behaviour in each culture.

Western cultures tend to emphasise individual autonomy and that people are responsible for

their own behaviour, while Eastern cultures tend to emphasise interdependence between

people and the importance of social relationships and cooperation.

For more infomation >> UQx PSYC1030.1x 3-4-4 Part B: Conformity - Duration: 4:20.

-------------------------------------------

UQx PSYC1030.1x 2-3-3 Part B: Communicator factors: Credibility - Duration: 2:39.

So, what did you predict?

Let's look at what Hovland and Weiss found and see if it is what you predicted.

On this graph, you can see the amount that participants were persuaded on the y-axis,

the larger numbers are indicating a greater extent of persuasion.

On the x-axis you can see the two times that participants were asked about the practicality

of building a nuclear powered submarine––immediately after the message was presented and four weeks

later.

The blue bars refer to those who thought the message came from a source high in credibility,

and the green bars refer to those who thought the message came from a source low in credibility.

You will notice, that in line with what Hovland and Weiss expected, immediately after the

persuasive message was presented, participants were more persuaded by the communicator who

was higher in credibility compared to the communicator who was lower in credibility.

Interestingly, four weeks later, the picture changes somewhat.

You will see now that the participants were pretty much equally convinced by the message

about nuclear powered submarines, whether it came from the communicator high or low

in credibility.

Why would this be the case?

Hovland and Weiss called this the Sleeper Effect.

They thought it was due to two processes.

The first of these was "discounting", which is when we give less weight to a message

from a communicator who is not very credible.

Discounting happens at the time that the message is presented.

The second process was "disassociation", which is the uncoupling of who the communicator

is, from what they said.

Disassociation happens when there is a delay between when the message is presented by the

communicator and when participants' attitudes are measured.

The Sleeper Effect is obviously a concern when we are thinking about contexts such as

election campaigns, advertising, and even jury trials, where people have to retain information

for an extended period of time, and then make a judgement based on this information.

There is the possibility that we can be influenced by unreliable information without realising.

In essence, if we can understand the message, who said it doesn't matter so much over

time, as we forget where the message came from.

What about another communicator factor that advertisers really love using?

Let's try another activity.

For more infomation >> UQx PSYC1030.1x 2-3-3 Part B: Communicator factors: Credibility - Duration: 2:39.

-------------------------------------------

UQx PSYC1030.1x 2-3-6 Part B: Message factors: Using fear - Duration: 1:47.

Let's take a look at what they found.

On the y-axis we have the percentage of conformity.

And on the x-axis we have the three different levels of fear.

When Janis and Feshbach (1953) looked at the net change in conformity with the dental hygiene

recommendations in the persuasive message, they found that it was actually the group

of participants who received the low fear message who went along with the message the

most.

These results suggest that fear can have the opposite effect that to what we want.

Researchers call this a "boomerang effect".

This seems surprising.

You might have expected that the high fear message would produce the most conformity.

But it seems that a high fear message can sometimes result in increased resistance from

the audience as they try to block out the fear-inducing message.

This is not always the case however, and other researchers have found the opposite pattern

of results, with high fear messages being more persuasive.

It turns out that it depends on whether you provide information about how to effectively

respond to the fear inducing threat that's included in the persuasive message.

Exactly how to do this was set out in 1983 by Rogers in a revision of Protection motivation

theory.

According to Rogers, for fear to increase the persuasiveness of a message, the message

needs to tell you that the threat is severe, that it can affect you, but that there is

an effective behaviour to avoid the danger posed by the threat, and that your able to

perform whatever behaviour that is.

For more infomation >> UQx PSYC1030.1x 2-3-6 Part B: Message factors: Using fear - Duration: 1:47.

-------------------------------------------

UQx PSYC1030.1x 6-3-4 Part B: The Stanford prison experiment - Duration: 2:32.

Zimbardo and his colleagues found that the illusion of a prison environment actually

became a reality.

At the start, both guards and prisoners settled into their new roles.

However, only hours into the experiment, the guards began to show aggression towards the

prisoners, and started to torment the prisoners.

The guards insulted the prisoners and gave them pointless and boring tasks to complete.

If the prisoners refused to complete the tasks, the guards would punish the prisoners by taking

away their mattress and leaving them to sleep on concrete.

The prisoners were dehumanised during the experiment.

They took on the prison rules very seriously, as though the rules were set for their own

benefit and breaking them would get them into a lot of trouble.

Some prisoners even turned on other prisoners who did not conform to the rules.

In the end, everyday healthy active people became brutal guards and sick zombie-like

prisoners.

   The whole situation became so real that many

of the prisoners developed extreme levels of stress and were released from the experiment.

Zimbardo and his colleagues initially planned to observe the simulation for two weeks.

However, the behaviour of the guards was so abusive he had to stop the experiment after

6 days.

The findings from the Stanford Prison Experiment demonstrate that both prisoners and guards

were deindividuated, but the guards and prisoners behaved differently.

The guards became aggressive, cruel, and abusive towards the prisoners.

Whereas, those socialised into the role of prisoners became compliant, powerless, quiet,

and passive.

Consistent with the findings from the Milgram electric shock experiment, the findings from

the Stanford Prison Experiment seem to suggest that, the personality explanations that we

tend to use as the reason why some people do horrible things to others doesn't seem

to hold up.

The findings from both the Milgram and the Stanford prison experiments illustrate the

power of the situation.

These experiments showed that, psychologically stable and normal members of the population

can elicit abusive and degrading behaviours, simply because the role allowed them to behave

that way.

The message of much of social psychology is that we all have the capacity to be horrible.

And, we all have the capacity to be great.

How we behave depends on the situation and the environment that we are in.

For more infomation >> UQx PSYC1030.1x 6-3-4 Part B: The Stanford prison experiment - Duration: 2:32.

-------------------------------------------

UQx PSYC1030.1x 3-2-4 Part B: Reciprocal concessions & door in the face - Duration: 3:09.

So, let's see how the door in the face technique can work.

In their 1975 study, Robert Cialdini and his colleagues said to people: "Would you be

interested in helping out with this really good cause?

We have some troubled kids and we need counseling for them.

Maybe you could help out two hours a week for two years and provide volunteer counseling?"

Of course, people replied something along these lines: "Aw, I'd love to, but you

know I have a life, so no."

The researchers would then follow it up with the real request: "Fine, of course.

I understand that.

Actually, I've got this favor to ask.

These kids are going to the zoo in the afternoon and we've got no one to look after them.

Would it be okay if you were that person?

Could you go chaperone these kids?"

So, how many people said yes?

Half.

People are nice, right?

That's a big favor.

Like 50 percent of people are like: "By all means, I'm prepared to drag this group

of troubled kids, who might be extremely difficult to handle, to the zoo for the whole afternoon."

That's impressive, and it's due to the door in the face technique.

Remember, they started with the big request for a two-year commitment and backtracked

to asking for help taking the kids to the zoo for one afternoon.

But what happens if you don't use the "door in the face" technique?

When the researchers just came out with it: "How would you like to take the kids to

the zoo for the afternoon?"

This time, far fewer people agreed, actually only 17% of people said yes.

This is partly about reciprocal concession.

Humans are so nice that every time we say no, we feel a twinge of something.

We feel like we owe something.

There's also that contrast effect.

Next to something very big, other things don't seem so big anymore.

If you just bought a $200 dress, a $50 belt doesn't seem like such a big thing.

This also can be taken advantage of by governments and salespeople.

Cialdini, from his experience working at a used car yard, said that sometimes in negotiations,

buyers would ask for a cheaper deal, they might say: "Look, can you throw the window

tinting in with the deal?"

The salesperson knows full well they can do that, but then gives a big performance: "No,

we can't do that for you.

We can't possibly do that...Hang on, you know what?

I like you.

There's no harm in trying.

I'm just going to go to the boss and see what he thinks."

So, they'll go into the boss's office, and they just talk about golf or whatever,

and then the salesperson comes back out and says: "You know what?

The boss didn't like it, but we had this big battle about it, and at the end, we came

down on your side.

We can do that for you."

Now you've ended up at the same place.

The salesperson made the concession, but psychologically it feels very different for the buyer.

The buyer feels as though this guy has gone into battle for them, even if they haven't.

So now the buyer's in the palm of the salesperson's hand.

For more infomation >> UQx PSYC1030.1x 3-2-4 Part B: Reciprocal concessions & door in the face - Duration: 3:09.

-------------------------------------------

Seat Ibiza - Duration: 0:58.

For more infomation >> Seat Ibiza - Duration: 0:58.

-------------------------------------------

Skoda Fabia - Duration: 1:01.

For more infomation >> Skoda Fabia - Duration: 1:01.

-------------------------------------------

VW Touran - Duration: 0:50.

For more infomation >> VW Touran - Duration: 0:50.

-------------------------------------------

VW Polo - Duration: 0:52.

For more infomation >> VW Polo - Duration: 0:52.

-------------------------------------------

Seat Ateca - Duration: 0:59.

For more infomation >> Seat Ateca - Duration: 0:59.

-------------------------------------------

5 Facts, Moto X 2017 - Full Specs Leaked - Duration: 4:03.

For more infomation >> 5 Facts, Moto X 2017 - Full Specs Leaked - Duration: 4:03.

-------------------------------------------

The Voice 2017 Knockouts - Aaliyah Rose: "Like I'm Gonna Lose You" - Duration: 2:07.

♪♪♪

♪ I found myself dreaming

♪ In silver and gold

♪ Like a scene from a movie

♪ That every broken heart knows ♪

♪ Woke up in tears, you by my side ♪

♪ Breath of relief, and I realized ♪

♪ No, we're not promised tomorrow ♪

♪ So I'm gonna love you

♪ Like I'm gonna lose you

♪ I'm gonna love you

♪ Like I'm gonna lose you

♪ In the blink of an eye

♪ Just a whisper of smoke

♪ You could lose everything

♪ The truth is you never know

♪ Let's take our time

♪ Say what we want

♪ Use what we got

♪ Before it's all gone

♪ We're not promised tomorrow

♪ I'll tell you, I'm gonna love you ♪

♪ Like I'm gonna lose you

♪ I'm gonna love you

♪ Like I'm saying goodbye

♪ Wherever we're standing

♪ I won't take you for granted

♪ 'Cause we'll never know when

♪ When we'll run out of time

♪ So I'm gonna love you

♪ Like I'm gonna lose you

♪ I'm gonna love you

♪ Like I'm gonna lose you

Yes!

[ Cheers and applause ]

For more infomation >> The Voice 2017 Knockouts - Aaliyah Rose: "Like I'm Gonna Lose You" - Duration: 2:07.

-------------------------------------------

The Way I'm Living - The Groovehouse features OD Most, GK (GiantKilla) & Zacnon - Duration: 3:49.

For more infomation >> The Way I'm Living - The Groovehouse features OD Most, GK (GiantKilla) & Zacnon - Duration: 3:49.

-------------------------------------------

Find My Rest (In You) - JRAM Original - Duration: 4:30.

I just can't escape The weariness from my mistakes

I feel so lost and ashamed It's become more than I can take

So now I give it all to you Would you fill me with something new

I'm calling out to You I know I can't do this on my own

I don't have the strength to carry on With these burdens on my heart

I just want a brand new start But all I need to do

Is find my rest in You

All I see are the clouds of my distress (there is no one else who can save me from this mess)

And all these sorrows and this hurt are weighing on my chest

Nowadays it's all the same brokenness and pain

Longing for something new

I'm calling out to You I know I can't do this on my own

I don't have the strength to carry on With these burdens on my heart

I just want a brand new start But all I need to do

Is find my rest in You

I'm done doing my own thing Cause without you I'm nothing

The power within me has grown weak Get rid of this heart that's incomplete

So I'm running to you Lord I wanna receive Your

Fullness in my life Only you will satisfy

I'm calling out to You I know I can't do this on my own

I don't have the strength to carry on With these burdens on my heart

I just want a brand new start But all I need to do

Is find my rest in You

Do do do do do

Do do do do do do

Do do do do do

Find my rest in you

For more infomation >> Find My Rest (In You) - JRAM Original - Duration: 4:30.

-------------------------------------------

인간관계잘하는법-할말하고 삽시다(미움받을용기)[How to make good relationships - Let's say something] - Duration: 31:28.

For more infomation >> 인간관계잘하는법-할말하고 삽시다(미움받을용기)[How to make good relationships - Let's say something] - Duration: 31:28.

-------------------------------------------

Why Managers are Being Lazy and Entitled, NOT Millenials - Duration: 9:42.

Hey there everybody, Cameron Morrissey here.

I decided to do this video live just because it was a little different format.

I did a poll yesterday and I'm sadly not surprised by the responses that I got from it.

The poll was simply, millennials are the blank generation of workers yet.

We had a few different choices.

We had the most talented generation of workers yet.

We had the laziest generation of workers yet.

We had the most entitled generation of workers yet.

And we had the most misunderstood.

It didn't surprise me, but over 60% of the respondents, over 15,000 people viewed this

poll, but 60% of the respondents said that, "Millennials are the laziest or most entitled

generation yet."

I'm going to give everybody some tough love here because it's something I've been thinking

about for a long time and I've tackled it piecemeal with certain videos, but I really

wanted to just kind of dive right into it and hit you with the tough message that you

need out there, all right.

Personally, I believe that millennials are the most talented generation to come along

yet.

Certainly the most talented as far as the current market place is concerned.

They grew up in it.

Every generation is going to have that leg up in the current environment over prior generations,

but most importantly, and if I had to answer that poll, I would have said that they are

the most misunderstood generation of workers yet.

Or more to the point, existing leadership doesn't understand how to manage them and

instead of trying to figure it out, they slap labels on them and start lumping them all

together, all right.

There's a lot of things that bother me about this particular issue, so I'll try to stay

on point, but I think it's grossly unfair that your experience with one millennial or

several millennials, all of a sudden means that you start making sweeping generalizations

about an entire generation of workers.

That is lazy thinking, that is lazy behavior.

There's plenty of kids that I grew up with in high school that are lazy, unmotivated,

and entitled losers.

There's just as many that are smarter than me, more successful than me, but neither one

of those groups has any bearing on me as a worker.

Stop making those generalizations all right.

For those of you that say every millennial that stepped into your organization has not

worked out and has demonstrated that same behavior, well I might say that you might

have an issue with hiring.

Maybe you're not as good at hiring people as you think you are or maybe you're not as

good at leading them, but I'm getting a little bit ahead of myself.

I wanted to get back to misunderstanding, all right.

Here's the thing, every generation thinks that the generation that follows has it easier

than them.

There's an article in Fortune Magazine that warned that the group of 20 somethings that

are taking over the workplace are more prone to job hopping and more prone to having their

ego bruised than any generation prior.

Now that sounds familiar, we see those articles all the time.

We see this on Facebook all the time.

The thing is, that article was in Fortune Magazine in 1969.

These are not new issues that we have.

Generationally there's always going to be a misunderstanding because we have brought

up differently.

That doesn't mean that one is better or worse than another.

I'm just kind of setting the ground rule here.

Now listen, I say misunderstood because there's a very obvious reason.

The entire world changed.

Over the last 25 years, you look at 25 years ago, only the richest 1% of the 1% had cellular

phones.

The internet didn't even exist outside of academia.

Millennials grew up in it.

They grew up with the ability to Google the answer to any question that crossed their

mind.

They could stay in contact with anybody around the globe instantly.

They didn't have to leave messages on voicemail machines.

Yes, those things existed, everybody out there from prior generation.

Everything was much quicker for them.

Things happen faster for them.

There's social media, there's apps, there's all these things and they are native to these

particular individuals.

My generation had to come along.

If you can remember back to VCRs, you may remember having to set the clock on the VCR

for your parents, because your parents didn't understand it, all right.

That is a break, that's a huge communication barrier.

It is the biggest communication barrier that has probably existed since the Industrial

Revolution.

I would argue that it is a bigger barrier than that because it happened lightning fast.

The problem is, is nobody is discussing this issue.

The only time it pops up is when people are whining on social media about one side or

whining about the other.

They're not talking about the natural difference.

They're just name calling.

What I'm sick and tired of is my generation, generation X, the ones that are supposed to

be mature about these sorts of things, whining about the differences and how it makes it

so hard, and just judging people because it's so difficult.

Nobody ever said that leadership was difficult.

If anybody said it to you they were lying, and you knew darn good and well they were

lying about it right when they said it.

That's not leadership.

Coming up with excuses, whining, name-calling, that's a temper tantrum as a leader.

You're supposed to be above that, leaders are supposed to be above that.

When you start thinking that everything isn't supposed to change and things are supposed

to be just the way that you want it, newsflash, that's entitlement.

Leaders today seem to be entitled to things not changing, to them not having to take their

approach.

You're supposed to be after results as a leader.

You're supposed to be flexible in finding ways to get the most out of your employees,

but you don't.

Instead, you whine and you call millennials lazy because you lack the ability, drive,

or creativity to actually motivate them.

You call then entitled because you lack the ability to communicate with them and open

up a dialogue with them so that they understand things.

What I'm looking for out there is, I'm looking for that generation of leaders that are so

quick to bash the whole next generation that comes along, I'm asking them to take some

responsibility for their actions.

If you have an employee that's unmotivated, it is your job as a leader to motivate them.

If you can't, it says just as much about you as a leader as it does about the employee.

Your boss doesn't want to hear that you have problem, if you take a step back from that

and say, "You know what, you're not getting the results," and the person says, "Well it's

because I don't have the right employees."

That's an excuse.

That's a poor manager.

So many examples that I see out there of issues of leaders being incapable of communicating

in a different way that breeds understanding.

The one that pops up that I saw just recently was a leader complaining because their millennial

wanted to work from home, because there's no difference in working from home as opposed

to in the office.

The leader shut him down because they have no policy and no willingness to do that.

The issue was is that they didn't explain it.

That's poor communication on the leader's part.

The reason that the millennial isn't happy about that is because you didn't give them

a compelling reason why.

You can simply say, "Yes, you could do that work from home but there isn't as much collaboration

and teamwork.

Yes, you can still get that through technology, phone calls, what have you, but it's not going

to be as good."

That's an argument that somebody can understand.

That leader suffered from poor communication on things.

That's where the problem comes in, not from the millennial who couldn't understand it.

It's because you didn't actually give it to them.

That's part of the issue.

Millennials are far from stupid.

They want the reasons and "Because I said so," isn't one that they are going to accept.

They don't like any better than we did.

We all got that from our parents or from our bosses.

Whether you didn't get a reason for something, you just got, "Well because I said so."

The difference between my generation and the generation of millennials is they have the

guts to keep asking for it and if they don't get it they will bounce to a different job.

What so many leaders out there are calling entitlement, I really want to you to clue

into this; what they are calling entitlement, I call a demand for good leadership.

Most of what these millennials are asking for are covered in any solid book you can

get on leadership and management.

They want engagement.

They want communication.

They want a leadership development plan.

They want to be exposed to new things, to new projects, to new ideas.

Which one of those things is out of bounds for you to handle as a leader?

If you aren't getting the results and if you are bristling at those sort of questions,

then you have a huge issue in your leadership.

You have choices as a leader and you can adapt to the new generation of workers, everybody

has to at this point.

I assure you, you won't find a more talented bunch if you learn how to work with them.

But first you need the humility to know that you don't necessarily have all the answers,

and you need to be willing to put forth the effort to change and adapt your practices.

If you don't, then we're going to reading on social media on how one of those lazy,

entitled millennials took your job and is doing better at it then you.

This is a little bit, like I said, little bit of tough love on this particular one,

but I just wanted to handle it as quickly as I could in this live session.

Thanks so much everybody.

If you have questions on it, any particular situations, drop down into the comment section.

I'll try to be active there today in handling some of these things because I just want to

make sure we're opening the eyes to as many leaders out there as humanly possible.

Thanks so much for tuning in and I'll talk to you all later.

Bye-bye.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét