Youtube daily report Mar 7 2018

growing orchids using homemade

potting media

right potting mix for orchids

i'm using some materials

brick pieces, Coconut husk,charcoal

and bark pieces

bark pieces

if you find any insects or bugs in the bark pieces

put the bark pieces in boiling water for 5 minutes

after

drain the water and leave it for 15 minutes

then you can use in your potting mix

bark pieces allow air to circulate naturally around the roots

charcoal

it absorbs contaminants

allow the airflow through the potting mix

and

it retain moisture

and

help in good drainage

brick pieces

it holds moisture

or water retentive

and

increasing humidity for orchids

coconut husk

it must be cut into small pieces

coco husk can't use directly

because

coconut husk chips may have

a salt residue

that can hurt the roots

so

thoroughly clean

or soak in water for 24 hours

after

you can use it in your potting mix

and

coco husk retains moisture

while also providing sufficient air

next

selecting suitable pot

always select pots with drainage holes

When deciding on the type pot to use

plastic pots offer better water retention

and

Clay pots offer good stability

potting material dries faster in clay pots

while this can help keep

orchid roots appropriately dry

and also

it can also lead to over drying

so

if clay pot is your choice

you will want to be sure

to choose a potting medium

that will be able to absorb

and

maintain moisture

now

i just select clay pot

i'm going to put

brick pieces in the

bottom of the pot

this helps the air flow

and

also helps the drainage

and

then

i put some

charcoals

bark pieces

and

coco husk

don't mix together

all

put the potting media

as shown in the video

never use potting compost

potting compost holds far to much water

and

the roots would rot

re potting only needs

when the bark

or potting mix has broken down

orchids should not be re potted without a compelling reason

care for an orchid

Good light is required for orchids

but no direct sunlight

East-facing windows provide morning sunlight

and

the orchid will not overheat

or

dry out directly in the sun

flowering

orchids only produce flowers once a year

and

flowers bloom continuously for about a month

if your orchid drops all of its flowers

it will bloom again in one year

if it does not bloom again

it means

orchid needs new growing medium

and

dead roots and stems need pruned

before you pot the plant

watering

watering the orchid

when watering the orchid

make sure to water the soil

and

not the plant directly

if water goes down between the leaves

it can cause crown rot

Care must be taken to ensure that new growths

For more infomation >> How to Grow Orchid | Orchid Potting Medium | Orchid Growing Tips & care for beginners //GREEN PLANTS - Duration: 10:52.

-------------------------------------------

How To Make Protein Powder In Low Budget At Home | Homemade Protein Powder | Results Guaranteed !! - Duration: 8:37.

For more infomation >> How To Make Protein Powder In Low Budget At Home | Homemade Protein Powder | Results Guaranteed !! - Duration: 8:37.

-------------------------------------------

Janhvi Kapoor Celebrated Her 21st Birthday At OLD Age Home - Duration: 2:58.

Janhvi Kapoor Celebrated Her 21st Birthday At OLD Age Home

For more infomation >> Janhvi Kapoor Celebrated Her 21st Birthday At OLD Age Home - Duration: 2:58.

-------------------------------------------

The 1 Bitcoin Show- Bprivate excitement grows! ICO crackdown? Altcoin evolution, South Africa! - Duration: 14:57.

For more infomation >> The 1 Bitcoin Show- Bprivate excitement grows! ICO crackdown? Altcoin evolution, South Africa! - Duration: 14:57.

-------------------------------------------

ज्वारीच्या पीठाचे घावन | Jwarrichya peethache ghavan | Jawar Dosa | MadhurasRecipe | Ep - 333 - Duration: 7:26.

For more infomation >> ज्वारीच्या पीठाचे घावन | Jwarrichya peethache ghavan | Jawar Dosa | MadhurasRecipe | Ep - 333 - Duration: 7:26.

-------------------------------------------

MONERO (XMR) - ТОП 1 ПО КАПИТАЛИЗАЦИИ СРЕДИ АНОНИМНЫХ КРИПТОВАЛЮТ / ИНВЕСТИРОВАТЬ В БЛОКЧЕЙН МОНЕРО - Duration: 13:56.

For more infomation >> MONERO (XMR) - ТОП 1 ПО КАПИТАЛИЗАЦИИ СРЕДИ АНОНИМНЫХ КРИПТОВАЛЮТ / ИНВЕСТИРОВАТЬ В БЛОКЧЕЙН МОНЕРО - Duration: 13:56.

-------------------------------------------

Ce masque anti âge étonnant vous fera paraître 10 ans plus jeune - Duration: 2:48.

For more infomation >> Ce masque anti âge étonnant vous fera paraître 10 ans plus jeune - Duration: 2:48.

-------------------------------------------

Arsenal legend makes SHOCK revelation regarding Arsene Wenger and Ashley Cole ● News Now ● #AFC - Duration: 2:21.

Arsenal boss Arsene Wenger had nothing to do with making Ashley Cole the world's best

left-back.

That's the huge claim from former Gunners right-back Lee Dixon.

Dixon, who played under Wenger for over six seasons, claims it was club captain Tony Adams

who coached Cole to become master of his craft.

Now plying his trade for LA Galaxy, Cole, 37, became an Emirates hate figure by leaving

to join London rivals Chelsea in a swap deal for William Gallas in 2006.

He went on to lift the Champions League and the Europa League with the Blues, while winning

107 caps for England.

But in a swipe at his former manager, Dixon says Wenger was in no way responsible for

the Arsenal trainee's meteoric rise to stardom.

Speaking to the Arsenal Supporters' Trust AGM on Monday night, Dixon said: "Tony Adams

coached Ashley Cole into becoming the best left back in the world.

"It had nothing to do with the coaching from Arsene."

And the criticism of the Frenchman didn't end there, with Dixon adding:

"It would be wrong to say Arsene doesn't know what he's doing, but he's floundering now

as everyone has caught up.

"You don't get to where he is if you're stupid."

The Frenchman is currently under the most intense pressure of his 22-year north London

reign.

Almost nine in 10 of supporters surveyed ahead of the AGM demanded Wenger leaves his post

at the end of this campaign.

Arsenal sit sixth in the Premier League, 13 points behind bitter rivals Tottenham.

They face AC Milan in the San Siro on Thursday night (6.00pm).

For more infomation >> Arsenal legend makes SHOCK revelation regarding Arsene Wenger and Ashley Cole ● News Now ● #AFC - Duration: 2:21.

-------------------------------------------

10 Hollywood Movies You Won't Recognize Without Their VFX - Duration: 8:01.

10 Hollywood Movies You Won't Recognize Without Their VFX

What would be your life without movies?

Yes, bland and that is exactly how some Hollywood movies would have been without VFX!

The larger than life sets, incredible backdrops, unbelievable stunts, thrilling action and

peculiar creatures, all boil down to one thing- VFX.

While we aren't denying the role of actors and directors in a movie, a great chunk of

its success can be attributed to VFX, especially if it is a sci-fi movie.

From aliens to zombies, from ice caps to flooding rivers, from marvelous forts to destroyed

airports, everything is a work of special effects.

Film making isn't easy people, rolling out one marvel after another takes a lot of tricks

and if these tricks interest you, we present 10 Hollywood movies that couldn't be made

without VFX!

Number 10.

Alice in Wonderland How many of you agree that Alice played a

significant role in our childhood?

This story book character had an interesting story to tell, all thanks to the chain of

events that happen!

If you have read the story, you know the characters described are anything but normal humans so

how do you recreate them onscreen?

Uhmm, VFX can help and that's exactly how Mad Hatter and Red Queen were modified to

fit the bill.

But it were Tweedledee and Tweedledum who were impossible without special effects.

And then can we overlook the amazing scenery in the movie?

That wasn't a real location, a lot of effort went into creating them digitally.

Are you awestruck now?

Number 9.

Life of Pi This 2012 American Drama revolves around an

Indian man who survived a shipwreck where his family dies and is adrift on a lifeboat

with a Bengal tiger.

Now you didn't think that a 16 year old boy was actually afloat in Pacific Ocean with

a tiger in his boat, or did you?

There was no tiger at all, it was created later using VFX.

Oh and what about those close up shots with the boy?

Uhmm, it was just a soft toy!

But this isn't the biggest shock, the real surprise is that the movie was shot is a studio

and the lifeboat was actually floating in a swimming pool!

Number 8.

The Hobbit: The Desolation Of Smaug From the expansive backgrounds of Lake-town

and Erebor to extensively detailed creatures like spiders of Mirkwood and the Dragon Smaug,

everything was achieved by VFX.

They were so well done that you almost believed the fantasy elements to be very much a part

of the real shoot!

Here again, the scenes were shot inside a studio with huge green screens that changed

into mesmerizing waterfalls and forests, thanks to technology!

Number 7.

The Avengers When it comes to creating fire and destruction

in superhero movies, Marvel does a marvelous job!

In the scene where Scarlett Johanson is pictured battling a blast, the visual is so intense

that you want to scream out of fear!

You can watch the movie again without stress on your mind because Scarlett wasn't subjected

to that kinda danger, here's where VFX comes into play.

There were huge green screens behind the actors that were made to look like a city under threat,

so our heroes could easily save us from the blast because there wasn't any blast at

all!

Cool, we mean hot!

Number 6.

Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Men Tell No Tales

Who all fell in love with Captain Jack Sparrow?

No?

At least the movie left you amazed for sure, after all, there were so many special effects

to keep you interested!

The poor boat that dealt with sharks, uhmm there was no water while shooting and obviously

no sharks.

The boat was in the studio in front of huge screens, in fact most scenes focused on water

waves were a gift of special effects!

The ship tossing and battling waves was a gripping one but uhmm, again VFX was the magician!

And what's with the strange faced pirate?

Makeup- no, that was again technology, making him scary!

Number 5.

Avatar There is no way this epic science fiction

film was possible without the magic touch of VFX.

Avatar is set in the mid-22nd century, when humans are colonizing Pandora, a lush habitable

moon of a gas giant which threatens the local tribe of Na'vi – a humanoid species indigenous

to Pandora.

That's where the genetically engineered Avatar is created to interact with the tribe.

Enough of story line, let's focus on special effects.

The humanoids were different looking, such that makeup itself couldn't create that,

so some technology came into play.

Lights and green screens were used optimally to create a movie that gave the audience an

amazing experience!

Number 4.

Jurassic World After three films of the Jurassic Park series,

the fourth installment came bearing the name, Jurassic World.

This movie again is set on the fictional island of Nublar where a theme park populated with

cloned dinosaurs has operated for ten years.

The park plunges into chaos when a genetically created dinosaur breaks loose and goes on

a rampage across the island.

The plot itself screams of the need for VFX, how else can you create dinosaurs that went

extinct way before humans came into existence?

There were life sized animatronics and computer generated imagery to bring about the story

perfectly.

To get a reference for movements, some of the crew members pretended to be dinosaurs

and acted like them.

Had we been doing that, the title of our resume would read, "Played baby Triceratops"!

Number 3.

Black Panther The most recent addition to the list of movies

driven by VFX on a large scale is Black Panther.

Another Marvel character that we saw in Captain America: Civil War got its own film and we

must say, no stone was left unturned to make it a killer movie!

Talking about special effects, in one shot Klaue's left arm was digitally removed and

instead a cloth was added in its place.

We kinda believed that the man had a missing arm, it really was done so efficiently!

We saw the technicians do a great job in creating places that don't exist, come on, they created

a whole fictional country with some blue screens!

Number 2.

Gravity The 2013 science fiction film revolved around

2 astronauts who are stranded in space after the mid-orbit destruction of their space shuttle,

and their subsequent attempt to return to Earth.

Now when we are talking about a film set in outer space, it is obvious that there were

not many real locations involved!

After all nobody wants to get a rocket and jet off to space to shoot a film, too much

risk!

So it was shot in a studio with minimal sets, makeup and costumes because the real action

was going on with a light box and a team of technicians with laptops!

You'd be surprised to know that not only was the location created by special effects

but also the controls and gadgets the actors are seen using!

Wow!

Number 1.

Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice The 2016 superhero film had a lot of action

and if you thought it was real, you are absolutely wrong.

From exploding cars to flooded city, the extreme looking visuals were created with a lot of

hard work, brainstorming and computers!

Jets flying over cities to people falling off buildings, you didn't expect it to actually

be shot, did you?

Going further on technology, the movie depicted certain places that weren't there!

Yea people, some backdrops you saw existed in just the computer, thanks to VFX!

We were fooled but as long as they come up with amazing films, we don't mind!

Which of these movies showed the most striking difference after VFX?

Tell us in the comment section below.

Subscribe to our channel if you liked this video.

And while you're here, check out our other videos and tell us what you think of them.

You can also find us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram.

Thanks for watching.

For more infomation >> 10 Hollywood Movies You Won't Recognize Without Their VFX - Duration: 8:01.

-------------------------------------------

Sam Nunberg's Wild Cable News Ride - Between the Scenes: The Daily Show - Duration: 1:31.

- And like I don't even know what he was thinking.

Because he gets the subpoena to testify.

I don't know if he thinks he did something wrong

or some around him did something wrong,

I don't know what he's thinking,

I don't know if he's panicking, but

he went to every single news network that would have him.

That's what the whole day,

he just went around,

to everyone.

It reminded me of,

I don't know if this happened to you,

it probably didn't because if you grew up in America,

but I know,

like growing up in South Africa,

one thing I dreaded was

getting a prepared beating from my mom.

Right?

Especially if you're an immigrant,

you probably know what I'm talking about,

or if you grew up in the south in America, probably.

Like there would be times when your parent would tell you

you're going to get an ass whooping when you come home.

And so instead of going home,

I would go to all of my family members,

to try to rally support,

I do what Nunberg was doing.

I'd go to my uncle and be like (crying)

Mom says she's going to hit me (crying)

and I don't want her to hit me. (crying)

And I didn't do the thing. (crying)

And then I'd leave and I would go to my grandmother,

and I'd be like, Mom says she's going to hit me. (crying)

And I didn't do anything. (crying)

Can you come and tell her please? (crying) Please.

I mean that's what he was doing,

he's hoping Wolf Blitzer would go with him

to Robert Mueller, and be like,

tell him, Wolf, tell him, please. (crying)

Tell him. (crying)

Wolf, please. (crying)

For more infomation >> Sam Nunberg's Wild Cable News Ride - Between the Scenes: The Daily Show - Duration: 1:31.

-------------------------------------------

Gary Cohn Resigns - Between the Scenes: The Daily Show - Duration: 0:52.

- Gary Cohn's an interesting one to me

because he threatened to resign

after Trump made the Nazis comment,

remember with Charlottesville.

'Cause Gary Cohn is Jewish,

and then, I mean you don't even need to be

in my opinion to find that comment offensive,

but he was like, I might quit.

After he said Nazis, they're some fine people,

I might quit, and then he's like,

but you know what, let's see how this ends. (laughing)

And then now Donald Trump was like,

I wanna impose steel tariffs,

and he's like, I'm out. (laughing)

That is a line too far. (laughing)

Nazis are one thing,

but steel tariffs I cannot bear, (laughing)

hashtag never forget. (laughing)

(dramatic music)

For more infomation >> Gary Cohn Resigns - Between the Scenes: The Daily Show - Duration: 0:52.

-------------------------------------------

Mayor Eric Garcetti Is Optimistic About Local Politics - Duration: 3:44.

-I'm always fascinated to talk to mayors,

because, obviously, we spend a lot of time on this show

talking about national politics.

And the people there spend a lot of time

in their home districts

but, obviously, a lot of time in D.C.

You spend all your time living where you serve.

You live amongst your constituents.

Are people always coming up to you

and telling them their problems?

-Of course.

It's the most direct democracy you can have.

I mean, people find you at the grocery store.

People find you at the park.

I mean, they'll come up to you and tell you anything.

You're, like, kind of a confessor and a priest.

They'll say like, "Hey, Mayor, I had a great date last night."

You're like, "Awesome!"

Or somebody will come up -- "I had a terrible date last night."

"Well, let's talk about that. Why?"

-Yeah. Did you run on a dating platform?

-I did. I did. -Yeah. Okay.

-That can be taken two ways, but I'll...

-Yeah, exactly.

-No, I basically also have my parents as my constituents.

So, you know, if you've had a Jewish mother ever before --

Like, it's like I'm at a community meeting.

They're like, "The traffic's really bad

on the West Side of L.A."

I say, "I know. My mom called me yesterday.

She had trouble getting to my dad."

And, so, it's a very accountable thing.

But, all joking aside, it's also where politics still lives.

It's a place where you can listen to people,

solve their problems, and actually accomplish something,

which is so different than what we see in Washington.

And that's not unique to L.A.

That's every local community, I think, where we live.

So, you know, don't give up on American politics

just because of what you hear coming out of D.C.

-And do you think, in general, there's more optimism and...

[ Cheers and applause ]

There's a better chance for optimism and change

on a local level than there is on a national level.

-Yeah. And, you know,

most politics happens locally, anyway.

I mean, it didn't matter whether it was gonna be

President Trump or President Clinton.

Most of the work you're gonna do on environment

is in your own backyard.

Most of the work you're gonna do on jobs,

on education, on your commute and transportation.

And people forget that,

because I think we cede a lot of power to Washington, D.C.

But look at these kids in Florida.

Like, that's their local community.

There's more leadership coming out of our teenagers

than coming out of Washington, D.C.

And I also think it's practical leadership.

People have strong beliefs in our cities,

our local communities,

but they also want to see the job get done.

They won't settle just for

a tweet, a re-tweet, a counter-tweet.

They want us to actually fix the street, like, do something.

-Yeah.

-And then the nice thing about being a mayor --

if I don't fix it, I'm on that pothole.

-So more streets, less tweets?

-Absolutely.

[ Chanting ] More streets, less tweets.

More streets... I like that.

-Well, of course, one of the problems in L.A. --

You mentioned potholes.

Obviously, traffic's a huge deal.

You guys have the Olympics coming in 2028.

And I feel like this is the first time in a long time

that I've heard someone actually got a good deal

as a host city for the Olympics.

And you have an initiative called Twenty-eight for '28.

-Yes.

-Is this about public transportation

or just general traffic?

-Yeah, well, we're the, unfortunately,

not only the car capital but the traffic capital of America.

But voters -- The same night that President Trump

was elected, there was other stuff on the ballot.

And we passed a $120 billion initiative

to build 15 transit lines in L.A., where cars reign supreme.

And by '28 -- 2028 -- when the Olympics come,

we'll have 28 of those projects done that are

improvements of roads, new lines.

A lot of middle-class jobs, too, that you can't export.

And I think people talk about politics --

they say words like "infrastructure."

What does that mean?

It means me getting home to my wife, my daughter.

It means me deciding I can make it to that date on time,

take that job.

We forgot to talk about things in human terms.

So, we're accelerating all this cool stuff for the Olympics.

I'm really proud that America will get the Olympics back

for the Summer Games, the first time since 1996.

And we're gonna make money off of it,

'cause we have everything basically built in L.A.,

from the Rams' stadium that's gonna be coming up,

using UCLA as our Olympic Village.

So we can focus on providing sports to a bunch of kids

leading up to then and after.

-That's really exciting. -Yeah.

For more infomation >> Mayor Eric Garcetti Is Optimistic About Local Politics - Duration: 3:44.

-------------------------------------------

Sex Scandal Forces Mayor Out - Duration: 8:47.

THE MAYOR OF NASHVILLE TENNESSEE HAS OFFICIALLY STEPPED

DOWN FOLLOWING A SEX SCANDAL THAT SHE WAS INVOLVED IN.

THE FORMER MAYOR MEGAN BARRY WAS CAUGHT HAVING AN AFFAIR

WITH THE HEAD OF HER SECURITY, SERGEANT ROBERT FORREST AND

THE AFFAIR WAS CONSENSUAL.

YES, THEY ARE BOTH MARRIED OR HAVING AN AFFAIR IS NOT BREAKING

THE LAW OR COMMITTING A CRIME, HOWEVER AN INVESTIGATION DID

FIND THAT THEY DID USE SOME TAXPAYER MONEY DURING THAN THEIR

AFFAIR WHICH LED TO HER PROMPTLY STEPPING DOWN.

TO GIVE YOU AN EXAMPLE OF HOW SHE COMMITTED THIS CRIME, THEY

WOULD GO ON WORK TRIPS AND OF COURSE AS HEAD OF HER SECURITY,

AND THE MAN SHE WAS HAVING THE AFFAIR WITH WOULD TRAVEL ALONG

WITH HER AND THEN THEY WOULD STAY AN EXTRA DAY AND CARRY OUT

WHATEVER SITUATION WAS GOING ON THERE.

YOU GUYS GET IT.

I THINK THEY DO.

SO HE WOULD BE ON THE CLOCK AND WAS CARRYING OUT THIS AFFAIR AND

AS A RESULT HE WAS USING TAXPAYER MONEY AND HE WILL HAVE

TO REIMBURSE THE CITY THAT AMOUNT.

THIS STORY SEEMS ODD TO ME.

THEY DID SOMETHING WRONG.

THEY DID USE TAXPAYER MONEY AND THEY SHOULD BE PUNISHED AS A

RESULT OF THAT, BUT I FEEL LIKE THE INVESTIGATION AND THE

HYPERFOCUS ON MEGAN BARRY IS ODD CONSIDERING HOW POLITICIANS

THROUGHOUT THE COUNTRY TYPICALLY BEHAVE.

LET HER GO.

LET HER GO.

OKAY, LET ME EXPLAIN.

I FIRST SEE THE HEADLINE AND SAY, I GUESS THIS IS A BAD

ADMISSION ON MY PART BUT I DIDN'T KNOW IF THE NASHVILLE

MAYOR WAS DEMOCRAT OR REPUBLICAN, I'M NOT INVOLVED IN

TENNESSEE POLITICS AND I THOUGHT TO MYSELF, YOU CAN BELIEVE ME IF

YOU WANT, DON'T BELIEVE ME IF YOU DON'T WANT, BUT I AM TELLING

YOU RIGHT

NOW THAT BEFORE I READ THE STORY I SAW THE HEADLINE THAT SHE

SLEPT WITH HER BODYGUARD AND HAD TO STEP DOWN AND I THOUGHT, WHY?

AND I SAID, I DO NOT CARE IF SHE'S A REPUBLICAN OR

DEMOCRAT AND

CURIOUS TO FIND OUT.

IF THAT IS ALL THERE IS TO THE

STORY, SHE SHOULD NOT STEP DOWN AT ALL.

I WAS CURIOUS IF SHE'S A REPUBLICAN, HYPOCRITE,

TALKED ABOUT FAMILY VALUES, THAT I WOULD CARE ABOUT THE EVEN

SO I AM TIRED OF JUDGING PEOPLE.

IT DEPENDS ON THE SEVERITY OF IT.

AND WE LOOKED INTO IT.

OF COURSE IT TURNS OUT SHE IS A DEMOCRAT.

SHE IS APPARENTLY PROGRESSIVE AND WAS VERY POPULAR NASHVILLE.

BY THE WAY, ANOTHER SOUTHERN POPULAR PROGRESSIVE WHO

THEN WINDS UP HAVING A SCANDAL AND THEN IS TAKEN DOWN.

ANYWAY, NOW THAT I'VE READ ALL THE DETAILS OF IT, NOT

QUITE AS EASY TO SAY LET HER GO BECAUSE THEY REALLY SHOULD

NOT HAVE DONE A COUPLE OF THINGS HERE, RIGHT?

ONE, YOU COULD SAY THEY SHOULDN'T HAVE HAD THE SEX.

YES, BUT THAT IS NOT OUR PROBLEM OR OUR ISSUE.

THEY WERE MARRIED.

IT'S SO EASY TO JUDGE PEOPLE ON SEX.

I DO NOT WANT TO.

I DON'T WANT TO JUDGE THEM WHETHER THEY ARE DEMOCRATS

OR REPUBLICANS.

I DON'T CARE.

AND WE'VE BEEN CONSISTENT ON THE SHOW.

IF THEY RUN ON FAMILY VALUES WE POINT IT OUT.

THERE BEEN A COUPLE

OF REPUBLICANS INVOLVED IN SEX SCANDALS WHO DID NOT RUN ON

FAMILY VALUES AND I SAID LET IT GO.

IT'S THEIR PROBLEM NOT OURS.

ANYWAY, IN THIS CASE YES, THEY SHOULD NOT OF STAYED AN EXTRA

DAY IN ATHENS, GREECE AND THE DIFFERENT TRICKS

THEY USED.

YES THEY USED TAXPAYER MONEY.

MORE PROBLEMATIC EVEN THAN THAT WAS THEY THEN SWITCHED, INSTEAD

OF

HIS BOSS KEEPING HIS TIMESHEET, TO THE MAYOR KEEPING HIS

TIMESHEET AND HE STARTS PUTTING THOSE HOURS ON OVERTIME.

YOU CAN'T DO THAT.

WHY DID YOU DO THAT?

THAT LOOKS LIKE THERE IS INTENT.

IT LOOKS LIKE THEY SWITCHED IT SO THEY COULD CHARGE MORE HOURS.

I DON'T CARE IF HE SLEEP WITH HIM BUT YOU CANNOT CHARGE MORE

HOURS ON PURPOSE AND SOME OF THESE TRIPS SHE DIDN'T HAVE

SECURITY ON BEFORE BUT AFTER THE AFFAIR, SHE HAS SECURITY

WITH HER ALL THE TIME.

THAT IS STILL RACKING UP THE BILLS FOR TAXPAYERS SO IT

IS WRONG.

I AM HALF KIDDING WHEN I SAY LET HER GO GOT ON THE OTHER

HAND, IT IS SO EASY TO DO POLITICAL ASSASSINATIONS OF

PEOPLE THOUGHT ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS LOOK INTO THEIR SEX LIFE.

FOR GUYS, YOU'RE GOING TO GET A HIT 8 OUT OF 10

TIMES BUT NOW, APPARENTLY FOR SOME WOMEN YOU'RE GOING TO

GET AHEAD A COUPLE OF TIMES.

I'VE SEEN REPUBLICAN WOMEN HAVE ISSUES WITH THIS TO, BUT

MOST OF THE TIME, THE PEOPLE LOOKING ARE REPUBLICANS, SO

THEY GET PROGRESSES FAR MORE OFTEN.

RIGHT, I ACTUALLY DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THE OUTCOME OF THIS

STORY BECAUSE OF THE FACT THAT THEY MISUSED TAXPAYER MONEY.

YOU CANNOT DO THAT.

YOU ARE STEALING FROM YOUR CONSTITUENTS.

I THINK IT MAKES SENSE FOR HER TO STEP DOWN.

IF IT WAS SIMPLY THE TWO OF THEM HAVING AN AFFAIR THEN I

DON'T EVEN THINK IT IS A STORY.

I WOULDN'T EVEN BOTHER TALKING ABOUT ON THE SHOW THAT THE

THING THAT I DO WANT TO POINT OUT IS HOW IT'S INTERESTING

HOW THIS COUNTRY WORKS.

THERE IS ONE FORM OF THEFT BY POLITICIANS THAT IS COMPLETELY

ACCEPTABLE AND THEN THERE'S THIS FORM OF THEFT FROM TAXPAYERS

THAT IS COMPLETELY UNACCEPTABLE AND SO WHAT I MEAN BY THAT IS

POLITICIANS THROUGHOUT THE COUNTRY WILL PUSH FOR

INSANE TAX CUTS FOR THE WEALTHY AND THEN WHAT DO THEY TURN INTO?

THEY DO REGRESSIVE TAXES ON THE WORKING CLASS AND THE

MIDDLE CLASS, ESSENTIALLY ROBBING THE PEOPLE WHO NEED

THAT MONEY THE MOST.

THAT FORM OF THEFT IS TOTALLY FINE BUT THIS FORM IS

UNACCEPTABLE.

I JUST THINK WE NEED TO FOCUS ON WHAT THE REAL ISSUE IS.

$10,000 IS PRETTY SERIOUS.

THINK ABOUT HOW MUCH MONEY GETS TAKEN

AWAY FROM AMERICANS THROUGHOUT THE COUNTRY ON A REGULAR BASIS

IN THE FORM OF THESE TAX CUTS WHICH FURTHER DEFUND

PROGRAMS THAT WE NEED AND I AM NOT JUST TALKING

ABOUT WELFARE PROGRAMS.

I AM TALKING ABOUT QUALITY EDUCATION WHICH HAS BEEN

COMPLETELY UNDERFUNDED AND DISMANTLED AS A RESULT OF

POLITICIANS PUSHING FOR TAX CUTS.

I WANT TO BE SUPER CLEAR.

IT IS NOT JUST POLICY

DIFFERENCES, WHAT LEVEL SHOULD TAXES BE ADJUSTED?

TODAY TYT BROKE THE STORY ABOUT HEIDI HEITKAMP.

SHE'S A DEMOCRAT FROM NORTH DAKOTA.

SHE VOTED FOR BANKING DEREGULATION AND IT TURNS

OUT SHE'S $1 MILLION INVESTED IN THE BANK SHE DEREGULATED.

AND IT TURNS OUT SHE IS THE NUMBER ONE RECIPIENT OF CAMPAIGN

DONATIONS FROM THE BANKS.

COME ON, THAT IS NOT A POLICY DIFFERENCE.

THAT IS CORRUPTION 101 AND THAT DOES NOT INVOLVE $10,000,

IT INVOLVES BILLIONS OF DOLLARS.

AND AMAZING SKIES OVER A FIVE-YEAR PERIOD THE TOP

200 CORPORATIONS THAT DONATE THE POLITICIANS GAVE $5.8 BILLION.

THAT'S A LOT OF MONEY, THEY SPENT ON DONATIONS AND LOBBY.

YOU KNOW WHAT THEY GOT IN RETURN FROM TAXPAYER SUBSIDIES?

$4.4 TRILLION SO WE ARE PUTTING, SHE'S ON PROBATION, OUT OF

OFFICE, FOR $10,000 BUT $4.4

TRILLION TAKEN FROM OUR POCKETS AND THAT'S BUSINESS AS USUAL.

I AM PARTLY TIRED OF THE JUDGING OF PEOPLE'S SEX LIVES AND

HOW EASY IT IS TO DO POLITICAL ASSASSINATIONS OF YOUR

OPPONENT BECAUSE EVERYBODY MAKES MISTAKES AND ESPECIALLY

WHEN YOU MAKE ONE ABOUT SEX AND USUALLY IS COMPOUNDED

BECAUSE YOU KNOW WHAT PEOPLE DO WHEN THEY ARE HAVING AN

AFFAIR OR THE WRONG KIND OF SEX?

THEY LIKE.

SO IT IS SUPER EASY TO GET THEM AND THE RIGHT WING DOES IT

OVER AND OVER AGAIN.

MEANWHILE $4

TRILLION LEFT THE BUILDING AND YOU WERE NOT PAYING ATTENTION.

EXACTLY.

For more infomation >> Sex Scandal Forces Mayor Out - Duration: 8:47.

-------------------------------------------

Actress Accused Of Anti-Semitism - Duration: 9:07.

ACTRESS AMBER TAMBLYN RECENTLY TWEETED ABOUT AN

INCIDENT THAT SHE EXPERIENCED IN NEW YORK AND ASKED SOME OF

HER FOLLOWERS ON SOCIAL MEDIA TO HELP HER OUT IF THEY

RECOGNIZED A SPECIFIC INDIVIDUAL WHO TARGETED HER.

SHE SAYS:

SHE APPARENTLY GOT A TON OF

REACTION AND RESPONSE TO

THAT TWEET.

SHE FOLLOWED IT UP WITH THE FOLLOWING.

THAT LED TO SUPPORT AND CRITICISM, PEOPLE ACCUSING HER

OF BEING ANTI-SEMITIC THAT ONE WOMAN TWEETED TO HER:

CAN WE JUST STOP WITH THE POLITICALLY WOKE STUFF?

IT'S NOT, I WILL EXPLAIN IT TO YOU.

THERE WERE PEOPLE WHO AGREED WITH HER AND SAID THAT THEY

EXPERIENCED SIMILAR HARASSMENT.

A MAN BY THE NAME OF BENJAMIN SHARED HIS STORY AND

SHE RESPONDED TO THAT WITH THIS.

ON THIS SHOW, WE DEFEND ALL DIFFERENT COMMUNITIES, MUSLIM,

JEWISH, IF CHRISTIANS ARE ATTACKED, CHRISTIANS.

THEY HAPPEN TO BE THE MAJORITY IN THIS COUNTRY BUT THEY

ARE ATTACKED IN OTHER COUNTRIES WHERE THEY ARE THE MINORITY.

BLACKS, LATINOS, YOU NAME IT.

SO ARE HASIDIC JEWS THE SAME AS OTHER PEOPLE?

OF COURSE.

WE ARE ALL HOMO SAPIENS.

WE ROUGHLY HAVE THE SAME GENETIC MAKEUP AND SO THINKING THAT THEY

ARE SOMEHOW INHERENTLY DIFFERENT IS PREPOSTEROUS.

I AM NOT LIKE OTHER LIBERALS THOUGH.

I JUDGE CULTURES SO IT DOESN'T MEAN EVERYONE IN THE CULTURE IS

WRONG OR THAT YOU SHOULD MAKE BLANKET ASSUMPTIONS, BUT IT DOES

MEAN THAT SOME PARTS OF SOME CULTURES ARE NOT RIGHT.

THEY ARE JUST WRONG AND SO WE CAN ARGUE OVER THAT, WE CAN

DEBATE IT AND OTHER PEOPLE CAN SAY NO, I THINK THEY'RE

WONDERFUL OR SOME PEOPLE THINK KNOW, CULTURES ARE JUST

UNTOUCHABLE AND A LOT OF LIBERALS THINK THIS AND I

DISAGREE.

NO, YOU CANNOT JUDGE THE CULTURE.

NO, I CAN.

THERE ARE A LOT OF TERRIBLE CULTURES IN THE WORLD I CAN

GIVE YOU 1 MILLION EXAMPLES.

LET'S GIVE YOU AN EXAMPLE FROM CENTRAL ASIA.

THESE ARE TURKISH PEOPLE SO ROUGHLY MY PEOPLE.

THEY ARE NOMADIC SO IN THE OLD DAYS THEY WOULD GO AND DO

RAIDS AND THEY WOULD GET THEIR BRIDES AND THEY WOULD

KIDNAP THEM AND TAKE THEM HOME.

SO THAT STUCK AS PART OF THE CULTURE EVEN TO TODAY AND SMALL

PARTS OF CENTRAL ASIA AND THEY GO IN KIDNAP A WOMAN, RAPE HER

AND THEN HER PARENTS COME OVER AND CONVINCE HER TO MARRY HER

RAPIST.

THAT PART OF THE CULTURE SUCKS.

IT'S TOTALLY OUTDATED, YOU HAVE TO GET RID OF IT.

SLAVERY WAS PART OF OUR CULTURE.

WE HAVE TO GET RID OF IT.

WHETHER IT IS HASIDIC JEWS, MUSLIM FUNDAMENTALISTS OR

CHRISTIAN EVANGELICALS, WHAT BRINGS THEM TOGETHER IS NOT

THE RELIGION, IT WAS THE FUNDAMENTALISM AND DO SOME

FUNDAMENTALISTS REACT NEGATIVELY IN WAYS THAT ARE

COUNTERPRODUCTIVE AND THAT I DISAGREE WITH AND I THINK

ARE WRONG?

HELL YES THEY DO.

SO IF IT HAPPENS TO BE A HASIDIC JEW AND THAT CASE, JUDGING

WOMEN AND WHATEVER THEY ARE DOING AND IN THIS CASE, IF

SHE IS RIGHT, BUMPING HER BABY STROLLER WITH

HIS CAR?

WHY?

SHE IS NOT COVERED UP RIGHT?

SHE IS NOT IN YOUR RELIGION.

THE MUSLIM FUNDAMENTALIST, YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO DRAW

PROPHET MOHAMMED.

NO, YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO, I CAN DRAW WHATEVER I LIKE, I

AM NOT IN YOUR RELIGION.

SO ARE YOU ALLOWED TO CRITICIZE PARTS OF THE JEWISH

CULTURE?

YES, YOU ARE ALLOWED TO.

ARE WE ARE FREE COUNTRY OR NOT?

THAT IS NOT JUDGING JEWS OVERALL.

IF YOU DID THAT THEN I AM 1 BILLION PERCENT AGAINST YOU.

THERE'S A HUGE DIFFERENCE.

I'M GOING TO SAY SOMETHING THAT PROBABLY WILL RUB SOME

PEOPLE THE WRONG WAY AND THAT IS FINE, BUT I THINK IT IS

IMPORTANT TO TALK ABOUT IT.

I THINK THAT A LOT OF DIALOGUE IS CRIPPLED BY ACCUSATIONS OF

RACISM OR BIGOTRY OR HOMOPHOBIA OR TRANS-PHOBIA, WHATEVER IT IS

AND I THINK THAT HINDERING DIALOGUE IMMEDIATELY LEADS TO

STOPPING EDUCATION ABOUT IMPORTANT ISSUES AND I THINK WE

NEED TO TAKE A STEP BACK AND BY THE WAY, I MYSELF HAVE BEEN

GUILTY OF THIS IN THE PAST AND NOW I AM A LOT MORE COGNIZANT OF

WHAT I AM SAYING OR HOW I AM REACTING TO CERTAIN DIALOGUE

THAT I MIGHT FIND OFFENSIVE BUT MAYBE IT IS IMPORTANT FOR ME TO

KIND OF HEAR OUT WHAT THAT DIALOGUE IS AND THEN MAKE A

DECISION ABOUT WHAT I THINK.

IN THIS CASE, I FEEL LIKE I'M IMMEDIATELY WRITING HER

OFF AS ANTI-SEMITIC, FIRST OF ALL, ANTI-SEMITISM IS A

VERY HEAVY CHARGE.

RACISM IS A VERY HEAVY CHARGE AND I THINK BEFORE WE START

LABELING PEOPLE AS SUCH SIMPLY BECAUSE THEY WANT TO SHARE THEIR

PERSPECTIVE ON SOMETHING, WE NEED TO REALLY CONSIDER WHAT THE

RAMIFICATIONS OF THOSE LABELS ARE AND SO SHE EXPERIENCED

SOMETHING VERY REAL IN HER LIFE THAT SHE WANTS TO SPEAK OUT

ABOUT AND IF PEOPLE FEEL LIKE SHE'S GENERALIZING TOO MUCH I

THINK THERE'S A WAY OF APPROACHING HER AND TELLING HER

HEY, MAYBE YOU HAD THIS EXPERIENCE BUT IT IS NOT FAIR TO

GENERALIZE ALL HASIDIC MEN THIS WAY AND THEN HAVE A DISCUSSION

ABOUT THE CULTURE BUT THE MOST IMPORTANT THING TO TAKE AWAY

FROM THE STORY FOR ME IS THAT WE NEED TO STOP IMMEDIATELY

PREJUDGING PEOPLE BASED ON THE EXPERIENCES THAT THEY WANT

TO SHARE WITH THE WORLD AND THE DIALOGUE THAT THEY WANT TO HAVE.

I HAVE A SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT TAKE, AND TO ME, LOOK THESE ARE

HARD QUESTIONS.

JUST BECAUSE YOU SHOULDN'T IMMEDIATELY JUMP TO

CONCLUSIONS DOESN'T MEAN THAT SOME PEOPLE AREN'T RACIST

OR THAT THERE ISN'T INSTITUTIONAL RACISM OR THE

SOME PEOPLE ARE NOT ANTI-SEMITIC.

FOR EXAMPLE, THEN YOU GONE THE OTHER END OF THE SPECTRUM, ALEX

JONES TALKING ABOUT HOW BRIAN SELTZER AND MICHAEL WOLF ARE

GOING TO DRINK YOUR CHILDREN'S BLOOD AND THEY NOT ONLY RUN

THE MEDIA BUT THEY RUN THE BANKS.

THAT IS NOT SUBTLE.

THOSE ARE THE OLDEST HATEFUL ANTI-SEMITIC TROPES THAT

WE'VE SEEN THROUGHOUT THE WORLD SO YOU'VE GOT HAVE THE

COURAGE TO CALL THAT OUT AND NOT CALL IT EVEN AND NOT GO MAY

BE, DRINKING KIDS BLOOD, THAT IS THE OLDEST THING THAT THEY

SAID ABOUT JEWS IN EUROPE THAT LED TO PROGRAM AFTER

PROGRAM AND EVENTUALLY TO THE HOLOCAUST.

ON THE OTHER HAND, AND THIS IS WHY WE GET STUCK IN NO

MAN'S LAND, IT HAPPENS TO US ALL THE TIME.

TO THE BEST OF OUR ABILITIES WE THINK WE ARE TRYING TO BE

FAIR AND CALL THINGS AS THEY ARE.

YOU HAVE TO HAVE THE COURAGE TO NOT CALL THINGS EVEN EVERY TIME

DON THE OTHER HAND YOU CAN'T SAY JUST BECAUSE SOMEONE SAID

SOMETHING ABOUT HASIDIC JEWS ARE MUSLIMS ARE CHRISTIANS OR

WHATEVER IT MIGHT BE, THAT THEY ARE BY DEFINITION GUILTY.

HOLD ON, JUST MAKE A JUDGMENT CALL AND GO HEY, WHAT DID SHE

SAVE US THE JEWS, WHY DID SHE SAY THAT ABOUT SITTING JUICE?

WAS IT BECAUSE THEY ARE JEWISH

SO DID SHE SAY THEY'RE GOING TO DRINK YOUR KIDS BLOOD

THEN I WOULD BE LIKE NO, I CAN'T STAND HER BUT IF IN THE

CONTEXT OF FIGHTING FUNDAMENTALISM AND YOU ARE

JUMPING TO CONCLUSIONS, THEN YOU ARE WRONG.

I DON'T THINK IT'S A MATTER PREJUDGING OR NOT, IT'S A MATTER

OF MAKING THE RIGHT JUDGMENT CALL AND IT'S NOT A

BLACK-AND-WHITE WORLD AND HE GETS COMPLICATED AND WE HAVE TO

MAKE THOSE CALLS AND WE DO WITH TALKSHOW SO WE ARE CONSTANTLY

TALKING ABOUT THESE PEOPLE WHO ARE IN THE NEWS BUT I'M ASKING

EVERYBODY, KEEP AN OPEN MIND AND BY THE WAY, WE WALK THE WALK.

I SAID DON IVA SHOULDN'T GET FIRED WHEN HE SAID THE

RACIAL COMMENTS HE SAID BACK WHEN HE WAS ON CABLE NEWS.

OFTENTIMES I SHOULD SAY I SAY RUSH LIMBAUGH SHOULDN'T GET

FIRED I DO NOT AGREE WITH THEM, I CALL THEM OUT ON IT BUT

LET'S CONTINUE THE DIALOGUE.

ALTHOUGH IT BACK IN THE DAY I SAID THEY SHOULD HAVE

BROUGHT THEM BACK ON TV AND THEN BROUGHT IN THE PLAYERS, THE

AFRICAN-AMERICAN PLAYERS HE CRITICIZED AND HAD A DIALOGUE.

WOULD NOT BE MUCH MORE INTERESTING?

INSTEAD OF SHUTTING DOWN PEOPLE, LET'S GO BACK-AND-FORTH AND

IF YOU NEED TO CALL SOMEONE OUT, CALL THEM OUT.

BUT IF YOU NEED TO LISTEN TO SOMEONE, ALSO LISTEN TO

THEM AND HAVE A CONVERSATION.

For more infomation >> Actress Accused Of Anti-Semitism - Duration: 9:07.

-------------------------------------------

English Grammar: AUXILIARY VERBS – be, do, have - Duration: 13:08.

My name's Ronnie and I'm going to teach you some grammar.

It's kind of a... difficult grammar, but once you learn this overview of-dunh, dunh, dunh,

dunh-"Auxiliary Verbs", English grammar is going to become easier for you, I hope.

So, if you're just beginning to learn English grammar, oh, stay in there, you can do it.

Yuri, this goes out to you in Salvador, Brazil.

Let's keep going, man.

We have three auxiliary verbs that we use in English: "be", "do", and "have".

But the thing about the auxiliary verbs is that each auxiliary verb will tell us what

kind of grammar we're going to use with it.

So, let's look at the first one: "be".

So, "be" in its form in the present tense is "am", "is", "are"; negative: "am not",

"isn't", and "aren't".

These are present.

The past tense would be present...

Or, no.

The past tense in the positive is "was" and "were"; negative: "wasn't" and "weren't".

So, how do we actually use this auxiliary verb?

And the answer is: We use it in two forms of English grammar.

The first one is progressive.

So, if you have a progressive sentence, we have present progressive, past progressive,

and future progressive.

Every time we have a sentence in English with progressive, we know we're going to use the

verb "to be".

So, if our sentence is present progressive, we're going to use the present tense of the

verb "to be", "is am are" with a verb with "ing".

So, in English grammar, anything that's progressive or continuous is another word for the same

grammar, it's always going to be an "ing" on the verb.

The thing that changes and tells us the grammar is the verb "to be".

Present is: "is", "am", "are", plus verb "ing", but the past, we're going to use the past

tense: "was" and "were" plus verb "ing".

So, progressive will always have a verb "ing".

The thing that changes the tense of it is the verb "to be".

We have future progressive or future continuous.

In this one we're simply going to use the verb "will", so in this one we have "will

be" plus verb "ing".

For example: "I will be eating pizza."

This tells us what's going to happen in the future.

"I was eating pizza" was the past, and "I am eating pizza", something's happening now,

that's present progressive.

So, the progressive will always have the verb "to be", either past, present, or future,

and it will always have an "ing" on the verb.

Okay, cool.

Let's get more complicated, okay?

We have another structure in English grammar called passive.

Now, passive voice basically you're taking the action from the person or the focus on

the person, and we're putting it towards the activity.

So, in a normal English sentence we would say: "I eat lunch", but in a passive sentence,

we're taking away the subject and we're focusing on the action.

So, with the passive voice we have future passive, present passive, and past passive.

It goes along the same idea, is that the verb "to be" is going to tell us: Is it present?

Or if it's past.

When we use a passive sentence, we can only ever use the past participle of the verb,

or the third step of the verb.

So, passive will always be the verb "to be" plus the past participle.

If it's present, it's: "is", "am", "are", plus PP, past participle.

If it's past, it's "was" and "were" plus past participle.

It's hard to say the past participle, so I'm going to say PP.

I have to go PP.

So, as an example, we say: "Lunch is eaten", present tense.

"Lunch was eaten".

I'm going to step away and let you check that out.

Let your brain absorb it.

Make some sentences using this and the verb "to be".

If we used the future passive, I could say: "Lunch will be eaten", so again, when we're

using the future, we use "will be", but we're going to use the past participle.

Have you made some sentences?

Do it now.

Come on.

Make some sentences.

Go.

Okay.

So we've done the verb "to be".

And hopefully it's beginning to make sense, because English grammar rarely makes sense.

I'm going to make it make it make sense for you.

So, the next one is the auxiliary verb "do".

Now, this one's interesting because we only use it in the negative form in the simple

present, or we use it in the negative simple past.

So we don't have to worry about the positive, but we do use it for the negative in the simple

present and the negative in the past, and for questions.

So, let's check out first the simple present, or present simple.

We only use this auxiliary verb for the negative and the question form.

So, in the negative we're going to use subject, plus "don't" or "doesn't", plus the base verb.

Now, this is where English gets tricky and you have to remember that if it is "I", "you",

"we" and "they", we use "don't".

But if it's "he", "she", or "it", we have to use "doesn't".

So this is...

You always have to be careful with your subject and your verb agreement.

They have to agree.

So, as an example: "I don't like pizza."

If I used "he", I would say: "He doesn't like pizza."

And we have to be careful and use the base verb.

Okay?

The question would be: "Does he like pizza?"

Ar?

Like a dog.

If it's a question form, we put the auxiliary verb first: "do", "doesn't", subject, plus

the base verb.

Not the base verb, the base verb.

We also use this in the past simple, again, only with negative and only with a question.

So, the way that we change "did"...

Sorry, "does" into the negative is "didn't" in the past, but this is where we always make

a mistake.

I've told you English grammar is crazy, I'm not joking.

When we use "didn't", we always have to use the base verb.

So, this is where we get confused, because we think: "Ronnie, this is past tense."

So, if it's past tense, we have to use the past of the verb-mm-mm-because our auxiliary

verb "didn't" makes the sentence past.

So, if it's an auxiliary verb it's going to tell us if it's past or present, and we have

to use the base verb.

So, we have to say: "He didn't go home."

You cannot say: "He didn't went home."

That's grammatically wrong.

This verb tells us it's past, and this verb tells us it's present.

Oh, that's kind of cool when you learn it.

If you're doing the question form, it's very similar to this, past tense: "Did", subject,

plus your base.

Again, you always have to be careful.

Even though it is past, we actually have to use the base verb because the "did" or the

auxiliary verb tells us: "Hey, this is a past tense, not a present tense.

Please use the base verb."

So: "Did", "didn't".

Ah.

"Didn't" in the negative and "did" in the question.

Another tip when you are speaking English and you're asking someone a question, always

ask them a positive question.

It's more difficult for the listener, and for the speaker, and for everyone involved

if you use a negative question.

So, just for now, you're just learning this, always ask a positive question.

"Did I go home?", "Didn't I go home?"

The negative question is always much more confusing, and we need to make English grammar

simpler.

Ah.

We're almost done here.

I'm going to step away and let your absorb this.

Please make one, two, three, four sentences using the auxiliary verb "do".

And we're back with the last one, the last one, the most exciting one maybe ever.

Yeah.

This is the most exciting one.

We are going to use "have has", negative "haven't", and "hasn't", and then we have the past: "had"

and "hadn't".

So, when we use the verb as an auxiliary "have", we use it for perfect tenses in English.

They're so perfect.

So, when we use the perfect tense, our verb is always going to be the past participle,

just like in the passive.

So the passive and the perfects in English, we always use the past participle.

And again, we can have the future perfect, we can have present perfect, and we can have

past perfect.

So, the way we form the future perfect is we're going to use subject with "will", so

future we use "will" all the time, "have", and then the past participle.

Okay?

Or we can also use "has".

So, the future we use "will" plus "have", plus the past participle or the PP.

If we're using present perfect, we're going to use the subject: "have" or "has", plus

the past participle.

So, if you can think about this: "have" in the present tense is "have" and "has", so

in the past tense we're going to use "had" plus the past participle.

So, if we're using past perfect, we're using "had", plus PP.

If we're talking about present perfect, we're using "has" plus PP.

People get confused and a lot of people think that the present perfect is the present tense,

but it's not.

The present perfect talks about the past.

The thing that makes the verb present or past is our wonderful auxiliary verb: "have".

If the verb "have" is present perfect, we use the present tense of the verb.

If we use the past tense, if we use past perfect, we're going to use the past tense of "have".

So: "I haven't eaten lunch.

Oh, I'm hungry."

Future: "I will have played seven games", so we're using "will", "have", plus the past

participle.

If we use present perfect, we use: "he", "she", "it has eaten", "you already have eaten".

You have to be careful again on your subject and your verb agreement.

There're so many things to remember.

And then the past participle...

Or, sorry, the past perfect, all we're doing is changing "has" or "have" to "had".

And this one's cool, because we don't have to worry about "he", "she", and "it"; they

all use "had".

Thank you for being easy, past perfect.

If you have questions about these specific grammar points, if you don't know what these

grammar points are, if you want to know more detail about them, you know the website: www.engvid.com,

you can search in the search area and you can find exactly the grammar points and how

we use them.

But the thing that I need you to understand is the auxiliary verbs are going to help you

understand grammar easier I hope.

If you have questions, throw it to me in the comment box and I can help you.

Until next time, I'm out of here.

For more infomation >> English Grammar: AUXILIARY VERBS – be, do, have - Duration: 13:08.

-------------------------------------------

Aloo Tikki Recipe Frozen | फ्रोज़न आलू टिक्की । Crispy Potato Patties - Duration: 5:28.

For more infomation >> Aloo Tikki Recipe Frozen | फ्रोज़न आलू टिक्की । Crispy Potato Patties - Duration: 5:28.

-------------------------------------------

An immediate pay rise and cash bonus for ETU members at Ausgrid - Duration: 0:54.

For more infomation >> An immediate pay rise and cash bonus for ETU members at Ausgrid - Duration: 0:54.

-------------------------------------------

No One Saw This Coming! President Trump Dares To Give California Exactly What They Begged For, They' - Duration: 23:21.

No One Saw This Coming!

President Trump Dares To Give California Exactly What They Begged For, They're Scared Stiff

Liberal states love to show off against President Trump.

Until the point that it comes time for federal support.

Numerous states depend on the sponsorship of the federal government.

The White House gives huge amounts of assistance to the states, including grants, funds, staff,

and protection.

On the off chance that you remove this Welfare for the government, numerous states would

go belly up.

Maybe the most belligerent liberal state is California.

From the very beginning of Trump's administration, they've been a foe.

It appears like Jerry Brown and his senators have overlooked all the assistance the White

House sends his beleaguered state.

Presently the president is undermining to pull back this one pillar of protection.

Also, California is stuck in an unfortunate situation.

Via The San Diego Union-Tribune:

President Donald Trump said on Thursday that he's considering pulling Immigration and

Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers out of California.

Why?

Because he feels the state is giving his administration "no help" in targeting the violent MS-13

gang, especially in Los Angeles.

"We're getting no help from the state of California," Trump said from the White

House.

"Frankly, if I wanted to pull our people from California you would have a crime nest

like you've never seen in California.

All I'd have to do is say 'ICE and border patrol, let California learn…'"

"You would see crime like nobody's ever seen crime in this country," he said of

California without federal immigration agents.

"And yet we get no help from the state of California."

Liberals cherish bashing President Trump.

Be that as it may, the reality remains, they need him frantically.

The excellence flagging you see on the news is totally vacant.

Without continuous help provided by the government, states like California would be in ruins.

In any case, nowadays, liberals are going too far.

They don't understand that without the help of ICE, they'd be overpowered with criminal

action.

Each one of those illegals they protect aren't scouts.

Horrible drug cartels exploit the border.

They torment, murder, and rape innocents.

The main thing that appears to prevent them from wrecking California is Trump's ICE.

The limp-wristed CA government will be feeble to stop MS-13.

Their haven approaches ensure drug cartels are allowed to do what they wish.

Liberals underestimate it that the government is propping them up.

Be that as it may, what else do you anticipate?

Liberals dependably prevail off the backs of whatever remains of us.

That is their whole stage.

I, for one, trust Trump follows through on his pledge.

The dissatisfied CA government needs to wake up.

Real lives are in question.

Each American-adoring Californian merits superior to Brown, Harris, and Feinstein.

They have to see that their leaders are tricksters.

What do you think about this?

Do not hesitate and write your thoughts in the comment section below.

Thank you for reading.

H/T American Conservative Herald, The San Diego Union-Tribune

For more infomation >> No One Saw This Coming! President Trump Dares To Give California Exactly What They Begged For, They' - Duration: 23:21.

-------------------------------------------

BOXDEL MIAŻDŻY TUCZNIKA na jego streamie "GRA NA EMOCJACH"! - Duration: 10:54.

For more infomation >> BOXDEL MIAŻDŻY TUCZNIKA na jego streamie "GRA NA EMOCJACH"! - Duration: 10:54.

-------------------------------------------

Hakata Hanamidori – Enjoy Fukuoka's famous dish Mizutaki, a hotpot with chicken soup - Duration: 7:02.

Hi, it`s William from FeelFukuoka Japan.

It`s Chien Chien.

We`re going to have Mizutaki today.

And therefore we came to Hanamidori, one of Fukuoka's most famous restaurant for this hotpot dish.

Have you ever been to Hanamidori?

It`s going to be my 1st time.

How about you?

I`ve been here many times because it`s so tasty.

That much!?

It really is.

Oh, that much…

Let`s go inside.

Mizutaki is Hakata`s local cuisine. It`s a chicken broth based hotpot.

You can enjoy a natural taste of all the ingredients because its simply seasoned soup.

The restaurant has a nice atmosphere. You feel immediately welcome after entering.

This place is really Japanese styled.

There are Japanese style tables for large groups, and private rooms for a smaller groups.

I like the atmosphere of this place.

Yeah. This window looks great.

Decorated in Japanese style. You can literally feel Japan in here.

There is a Chinese menu.

That's so convenient.

There are varieties of course menus. Depending on the course, they serve different dishes.

There is even "Mentaiko" (Seasoned cod roe) that is the most popular food in Hakata.

Can I press?

Are you ready to order?

The Landlady, Mrs.Matsumoto served us that day.

We ordered her recommendation; "Hana course".

Hana course starts with an appetizer, then hot pot, and dessert in the end. With this course, you can enjoy all dishes of Hanamidori.

Let`s eat!

"Itadakimasu"

It`s mentaiko and cucumber.

This combination is so beautiful

How is it?

Does it taste good?

It`s cold and fresh.

It`s a chicken prosciutto. Have you tried?

Never.

It`s like raw fish.

It`s soft and I can taste the chicken flavor.

Excuse me.

Here`s a hot pot.

It`s Hakata Hanamidori`s Mizutaki.

When you eat Mizutaki, have some soup first.

Hanamidori serves rich chicken soup made with chicken legs stock and whole chicken.

It looks hot.

Is it hot?

Yes it is.

But it tastes refreshing.

It`s tasty.

Hanamidori uses only high quality chicken that are grown in Hanamidori`s own farm with a special care.

By taking care of their environment and food, the chicken meat has a high quality, It has no strong flavor or is chewy.

Can I add Ponzu (citrus-based sauce)?

It`s a chicken leg.

Looks tasty.

Excuse me.

Can`t wait to try.

It`s a big piece.

So soft!

Smells great!

How excellent to eat it with Ponzu!

Tasty

Perfect combination

It`s minced meat with yam and egg.

She is good at doing it

Like a professional

Fast!

In addition to chicken legs, Hanamidori uses heart and liver too.

Let me add a collagen jelly

I think this amount of collagen works well for your skin.

It smells good.

Isn`t it good?

Yes, it smells good.

There is nothing like this in Taiwan.

I`ve never tried something like this in Taiwan.

Add them as much as you want on your bowl.

Did you try some?

Yes I did.

It`s really good!

So tasty!

Thank you.

After enjoying some chicken, add some vegetables such as cabbages, green onions and mizuna.

It`s unusual to add rice in the end.

Yeah, but by doing so, you can enjoy the soup.

I see.

We don`t eat like this in Taiwan.

We usually add some noodles into the hot pot soup.

Cool.

It`s amazing to have chicken soup with some rice in the end of the hot pot.

Tasty but hot.

Only a fresh egg can make this softness.

Yeah, it`s soft.

Smells good.

It`s a pudding made by Hanami egg.

Yummy!

"Gochisousama deshita!"

How was it?

It was very delicious.

How was your first Mizutaki?

It was fresh and tasty, and I could feel that they`re taking care of all the details.

Seasonings and vegetables are all fresh.

Of course the dessert was

very good

I totally recommend it.

The landlady is so kind and beautiful. She gave us an amazing service.

Did you get her number?

No, I didn`t

When you visit Japan, please try "Hanamidori".

I agree

If you have no chance to visit Japan, there are 2 of them in Taiwan.

Really? 2 restaurants?

Yes! So you can try it in Taiwan.

I totally recommend it!

That`s all for today

See you later! Bye

For more infomation >> Hakata Hanamidori – Enjoy Fukuoka's famous dish Mizutaki, a hotpot with chicken soup - Duration: 7:02.

-------------------------------------------

How to make Idly batter and Soft Idly / இட்லி மாவு & இட்லி (in Tamil ) ? - Duration: 3:49.

Idly rice - 4 cup

Urad dal / ulundhu - 1 cup

Rinse urad dal and water and soak for 30-45 mins

Rinse Idly rice and water and soak for 1 1/2 hours

Grind the urad dal with required water for 20 - 30 mins.

Grind the rice with required water to make a smooth batter.

Grind the rice with required water to make a smooth batter.

Mix both the batter together in a large bowl and mix well.

Cover and ferment for 6 - 8 hours or more if required.

After the fermentation, the idly batter will become double in size and rise

Add Salt and required water to the batter and mix well..

Add Salt and required water to the batter and mix well.

Pour the batter in idly moulds and steam the idlies in a steamer for 8 - 10 min

Pour the batter in idly moulds and steam the idlies in a steamer for 8 - 10 min

Pour the batter in idly moulds and steam the idlies in a steamer for 8 - 10 min

For more infomation >> How to make Idly batter and Soft Idly / இட்லி மாவு & இட்லி (in Tamil ) ? - Duration: 3:49.

-------------------------------------------

ELHERA2 PARA KASMA TAKTİKLERİ | Elhera2 | Bölüm 2 | #Metin2 - Duration: 5:21.

For more infomation >> ELHERA2 PARA KASMA TAKTİKLERİ | Elhera2 | Bölüm 2 | #Metin2 - Duration: 5:21.

-------------------------------------------

Learn Colours For Babies DI...

For more infomation >> Learn Colours For Babies DI...

-------------------------------------------

For more infomation >> Learn Colours For Babies DI...

-------------------------------------------

CETTE VIDEO N'A AUCUN SENS | #FANTAXYOU2 - Duration: 3:07.

For more infomation >> CETTE VIDEO N'A AUCUN SENS | #FANTAXYOU2 - Duration: 3:07.

-------------------------------------------

For more infomation >> CETTE VIDEO N'A AUCUN SENS | #FANTAXYOU2 - Duration: 3:07.

-------------------------------------------

Sex Scandal Forces Mayor Out - Duration: 8:47.

THE MAYOR OF NASHVILLE TENNESSEE HAS OFFICIALLY STEPPED

DOWN FOLLOWING A SEX SCANDAL THAT SHE WAS INVOLVED IN.

THE FORMER MAYOR MEGAN BARRY WAS CAUGHT HAVING AN AFFAIR

WITH THE HEAD OF HER SECURITY, SERGEANT ROBERT FORREST AND

THE AFFAIR WAS CONSENSUAL.

YES, THEY ARE BOTH MARRIED OR HAVING AN AFFAIR IS NOT BREAKING

THE LAW OR COMMITTING A CRIME, HOWEVER AN INVESTIGATION DID

FIND THAT THEY DID USE SOME TAXPAYER MONEY DURING THAN THEIR

AFFAIR WHICH LED TO HER PROMPTLY STEPPING DOWN.

TO GIVE YOU AN EXAMPLE OF HOW SHE COMMITTED THIS CRIME, THEY

WOULD GO ON WORK TRIPS AND OF COURSE AS HEAD OF HER SECURITY,

AND THE MAN SHE WAS HAVING THE AFFAIR WITH WOULD TRAVEL ALONG

WITH HER AND THEN THEY WOULD STAY AN EXTRA DAY AND CARRY OUT

WHATEVER SITUATION WAS GOING ON THERE.

YOU GUYS GET IT.

I THINK THEY DO.

SO HE WOULD BE ON THE CLOCK AND WAS CARRYING OUT THIS AFFAIR AND

AS A RESULT HE WAS USING TAXPAYER MONEY AND HE WILL HAVE

TO REIMBURSE THE CITY THAT AMOUNT.

THIS STORY SEEMS ODD TO ME.

THEY DID SOMETHING WRONG.

THEY DID USE TAXPAYER MONEY AND THEY SHOULD BE PUNISHED AS A

RESULT OF THAT, BUT I FEEL LIKE THE INVESTIGATION AND THE

HYPERFOCUS ON MEGAN BARRY IS ODD CONSIDERING HOW POLITICIANS

THROUGHOUT THE COUNTRY TYPICALLY BEHAVE.

LET HER GO.

LET HER GO.

OKAY, LET ME EXPLAIN.

I FIRST SEE THE HEADLINE AND SAY, I GUESS THIS IS A BAD

ADMISSION ON MY PART BUT I DIDN'T KNOW IF THE NASHVILLE

MAYOR WAS DEMOCRAT OR REPUBLICAN, I'M NOT INVOLVED IN

TENNESSEE POLITICS AND I THOUGHT TO MYSELF, YOU CAN BELIEVE ME IF

YOU WANT, DON'T BELIEVE ME IF YOU DON'T WANT, BUT I AM TELLING

YOU RIGHT

NOW THAT BEFORE I READ THE STORY I SAW THE HEADLINE THAT SHE

SLEPT WITH HER BODYGUARD AND HAD TO STEP DOWN AND I THOUGHT, WHY?

AND I SAID, I DO NOT CARE IF SHE'S A REPUBLICAN OR

DEMOCRAT AND

CURIOUS TO FIND OUT.

IF THAT IS ALL THERE IS TO THE

STORY, SHE SHOULD NOT STEP DOWN AT ALL.

I WAS CURIOUS IF SHE'S A REPUBLICAN, HYPOCRITE,

TALKED ABOUT FAMILY VALUES, THAT I WOULD CARE ABOUT THE EVEN

SO I AM TIRED OF JUDGING PEOPLE.

IT DEPENDS ON THE SEVERITY OF IT.

AND WE LOOKED INTO IT.

OF COURSE IT TURNS OUT SHE IS A DEMOCRAT.

SHE IS APPARENTLY PROGRESSIVE AND WAS VERY POPULAR NASHVILLE.

BY THE WAY, ANOTHER SOUTHERN POPULAR PROGRESSIVE WHO

THEN WINDS UP HAVING A SCANDAL AND THEN IS TAKEN DOWN.

ANYWAY, NOW THAT I'VE READ ALL THE DETAILS OF IT, NOT

QUITE AS EASY TO SAY LET HER GO BECAUSE THEY REALLY SHOULD

NOT HAVE DONE A COUPLE OF THINGS HERE, RIGHT?

ONE, YOU COULD SAY THEY SHOULDN'T HAVE HAD THE SEX.

YES, BUT THAT IS NOT OUR PROBLEM OR OUR ISSUE.

THEY WERE MARRIED.

IT'S SO EASY TO JUDGE PEOPLE ON SEX.

I DO NOT WANT TO.

I DON'T WANT TO JUDGE THEM WHETHER THEY ARE DEMOCRATS

OR REPUBLICANS.

I DON'T CARE.

AND WE'VE BEEN CONSISTENT ON THE SHOW.

IF THEY RUN ON FAMILY VALUES WE POINT IT OUT.

THERE BEEN A COUPLE

OF REPUBLICANS INVOLVED IN SEX SCANDALS WHO DID NOT RUN ON

FAMILY VALUES AND I SAID LET IT GO.

IT'S THEIR PROBLEM NOT OURS.

ANYWAY, IN THIS CASE YES, THEY SHOULD NOT OF STAYED AN EXTRA

DAY IN ATHENS, GREECE AND THE DIFFERENT TRICKS

THEY USED.

YES THEY USED TAXPAYER MONEY.

MORE PROBLEMATIC EVEN THAN THAT WAS THEY THEN SWITCHED, INSTEAD

OF

HIS BOSS KEEPING HIS TIMESHEET, TO THE MAYOR KEEPING HIS

TIMESHEET AND HE STARTS PUTTING THOSE HOURS ON OVERTIME.

YOU CAN'T DO THAT.

WHY DID YOU DO THAT?

THAT LOOKS LIKE THERE IS INTENT.

IT LOOKS LIKE THEY SWITCHED IT SO THEY COULD CHARGE MORE HOURS.

I DON'T CARE IF HE SLEEP WITH HIM BUT YOU CANNOT CHARGE MORE

HOURS ON PURPOSE AND SOME OF THESE TRIPS SHE DIDN'T HAVE

SECURITY ON BEFORE BUT AFTER THE AFFAIR, SHE HAS SECURITY

WITH HER ALL THE TIME.

THAT IS STILL RACKING UP THE BILLS FOR TAXPAYERS SO IT

IS WRONG.

I AM HALF KIDDING WHEN I SAY LET HER GO GOT ON THE OTHER

HAND, IT IS SO EASY TO DO POLITICAL ASSASSINATIONS OF

PEOPLE THOUGHT ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS LOOK INTO THEIR SEX LIFE.

FOR GUYS, YOU'RE GOING TO GET A HIT 8 OUT OF 10

TIMES BUT NOW, APPARENTLY FOR SOME WOMEN YOU'RE GOING TO

GET AHEAD A COUPLE OF TIMES.

I'VE SEEN REPUBLICAN WOMEN HAVE ISSUES WITH THIS TO, BUT

MOST OF THE TIME, THE PEOPLE LOOKING ARE REPUBLICANS, SO

THEY GET PROGRESSES FAR MORE OFTEN.

RIGHT, I ACTUALLY DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THE OUTCOME OF THIS

STORY BECAUSE OF THE FACT THAT THEY MISUSED TAXPAYER MONEY.

YOU CANNOT DO THAT.

YOU ARE STEALING FROM YOUR CONSTITUENTS.

I THINK IT MAKES SENSE FOR HER TO STEP DOWN.

IF IT WAS SIMPLY THE TWO OF THEM HAVING AN AFFAIR THEN I

DON'T EVEN THINK IT IS A STORY.

I WOULDN'T EVEN BOTHER TALKING ABOUT ON THE SHOW THAT THE

THING THAT I DO WANT TO POINT OUT IS HOW IT'S INTERESTING

HOW THIS COUNTRY WORKS.

THERE IS ONE FORM OF THEFT BY POLITICIANS THAT IS COMPLETELY

ACCEPTABLE AND THEN THERE'S THIS FORM OF THEFT FROM TAXPAYERS

THAT IS COMPLETELY UNACCEPTABLE AND SO WHAT I MEAN BY THAT IS

POLITICIANS THROUGHOUT THE COUNTRY WILL PUSH FOR

INSANE TAX CUTS FOR THE WEALTHY AND THEN WHAT DO THEY TURN INTO?

THEY DO REGRESSIVE TAXES ON THE WORKING CLASS AND THE

MIDDLE CLASS, ESSENTIALLY ROBBING THE PEOPLE WHO NEED

THAT MONEY THE MOST.

THAT FORM OF THEFT IS TOTALLY FINE BUT THIS FORM IS

UNACCEPTABLE.

I JUST THINK WE NEED TO FOCUS ON WHAT THE REAL ISSUE IS.

$10,000 IS PRETTY SERIOUS.

THINK ABOUT HOW MUCH MONEY GETS TAKEN

AWAY FROM AMERICANS THROUGHOUT THE COUNTRY ON A REGULAR BASIS

IN THE FORM OF THESE TAX CUTS WHICH FURTHER DEFUND

PROGRAMS THAT WE NEED AND I AM NOT JUST TALKING

ABOUT WELFARE PROGRAMS.

I AM TALKING ABOUT QUALITY EDUCATION WHICH HAS BEEN

COMPLETELY UNDERFUNDED AND DISMANTLED AS A RESULT OF

POLITICIANS PUSHING FOR TAX CUTS.

I WANT TO BE SUPER CLEAR.

IT IS NOT JUST POLICY

DIFFERENCES, WHAT LEVEL SHOULD TAXES BE ADJUSTED?

TODAY TYT BROKE THE STORY ABOUT HEIDI HEITKAMP.

SHE'S A DEMOCRAT FROM NORTH DAKOTA.

SHE VOTED FOR BANKING DEREGULATION AND IT TURNS

OUT SHE'S $1 MILLION INVESTED IN THE BANK SHE DEREGULATED.

AND IT TURNS OUT SHE IS THE NUMBER ONE RECIPIENT OF CAMPAIGN

DONATIONS FROM THE BANKS.

COME ON, THAT IS NOT A POLICY DIFFERENCE.

THAT IS CORRUPTION 101 AND THAT DOES NOT INVOLVE $10,000,

IT INVOLVES BILLIONS OF DOLLARS.

AND AMAZING SKIES OVER A FIVE-YEAR PERIOD THE TOP

200 CORPORATIONS THAT DONATE THE POLITICIANS GAVE $5.8 BILLION.

THAT'S A LOT OF MONEY, THEY SPENT ON DONATIONS AND LOBBY.

YOU KNOW WHAT THEY GOT IN RETURN FROM TAXPAYER SUBSIDIES?

$4.4 TRILLION SO WE ARE PUTTING, SHE'S ON PROBATION, OUT OF

OFFICE, FOR $10,000 BUT $4.4

TRILLION TAKEN FROM OUR POCKETS AND THAT'S BUSINESS AS USUAL.

I AM PARTLY TIRED OF THE JUDGING OF PEOPLE'S SEX LIVES AND

HOW EASY IT IS TO DO POLITICAL ASSASSINATIONS OF YOUR

OPPONENT BECAUSE EVERYBODY MAKES MISTAKES AND ESPECIALLY

WHEN YOU MAKE ONE ABOUT SEX AND USUALLY IS COMPOUNDED

BECAUSE YOU KNOW WHAT PEOPLE DO WHEN THEY ARE HAVING AN

AFFAIR OR THE WRONG KIND OF SEX?

THEY LIKE.

SO IT IS SUPER EASY TO GET THEM AND THE RIGHT WING DOES IT

OVER AND OVER AGAIN.

MEANWHILE $4

TRILLION LEFT THE BUILDING AND YOU WERE NOT PAYING ATTENTION.

EXACTLY.

For more infomation >> Sex Scandal Forces Mayor Out - Duration: 8:47.

-------------------------------------------

For more infomation >> Sex Scandal Forces Mayor Out - Duration: 8:47.

-------------------------------------------

Actress Accused Of Anti-Semitism - Duration: 9:07.

ACTRESS AMBER TAMBLYN RECENTLY TWEETED ABOUT AN

INCIDENT THAT SHE EXPERIENCED IN NEW YORK AND ASKED SOME OF

HER FOLLOWERS ON SOCIAL MEDIA TO HELP HER OUT IF THEY

RECOGNIZED A SPECIFIC INDIVIDUAL WHO TARGETED HER.

SHE SAYS:

SHE APPARENTLY GOT A TON OF

REACTION AND RESPONSE TO

THAT TWEET.

SHE FOLLOWED IT UP WITH THE FOLLOWING.

THAT LED TO SUPPORT AND CRITICISM, PEOPLE ACCUSING HER

OF BEING ANTI-SEMITIC THAT ONE WOMAN TWEETED TO HER:

CAN WE JUST STOP WITH THE POLITICALLY WOKE STUFF?

IT'S NOT, I WILL EXPLAIN IT TO YOU.

THERE WERE PEOPLE WHO AGREED WITH HER AND SAID THAT THEY

EXPERIENCED SIMILAR HARASSMENT.

A MAN BY THE NAME OF BENJAMIN SHARED HIS STORY AND

SHE RESPONDED TO THAT WITH THIS.

ON THIS SHOW, WE DEFEND ALL DIFFERENT COMMUNITIES, MUSLIM,

JEWISH, IF CHRISTIANS ARE ATTACKED, CHRISTIANS.

THEY HAPPEN TO BE THE MAJORITY IN THIS COUNTRY BUT THEY

ARE ATTACKED IN OTHER COUNTRIES WHERE THEY ARE THE MINORITY.

BLACKS, LATINOS, YOU NAME IT.

SO ARE HASIDIC JEWS THE SAME AS OTHER PEOPLE?

OF COURSE.

WE ARE ALL HOMO SAPIENS.

WE ROUGHLY HAVE THE SAME GENETIC MAKEUP AND SO THINKING THAT THEY

ARE SOMEHOW INHERENTLY DIFFERENT IS PREPOSTEROUS.

I AM NOT LIKE OTHER LIBERALS THOUGH.

I JUDGE CULTURES SO IT DOESN'T MEAN EVERYONE IN THE CULTURE IS

WRONG OR THAT YOU SHOULD MAKE BLANKET ASSUMPTIONS, BUT IT DOES

MEAN THAT SOME PARTS OF SOME CULTURES ARE NOT RIGHT.

THEY ARE JUST WRONG AND SO WE CAN ARGUE OVER THAT, WE CAN

DEBATE IT AND OTHER PEOPLE CAN SAY NO, I THINK THEY'RE

WONDERFUL OR SOME PEOPLE THINK KNOW, CULTURES ARE JUST

UNTOUCHABLE AND A LOT OF LIBERALS THINK THIS AND I

DISAGREE.

NO, YOU CANNOT JUDGE THE CULTURE.

NO, I CAN.

THERE ARE A LOT OF TERRIBLE CULTURES IN THE WORLD I CAN

GIVE YOU 1 MILLION EXAMPLES.

LET'S GIVE YOU AN EXAMPLE FROM CENTRAL ASIA.

THESE ARE TURKISH PEOPLE SO ROUGHLY MY PEOPLE.

THEY ARE NOMADIC SO IN THE OLD DAYS THEY WOULD GO AND DO

RAIDS AND THEY WOULD GET THEIR BRIDES AND THEY WOULD

KIDNAP THEM AND TAKE THEM HOME.

SO THAT STUCK AS PART OF THE CULTURE EVEN TO TODAY AND SMALL

PARTS OF CENTRAL ASIA AND THEY GO IN KIDNAP A WOMAN, RAPE HER

AND THEN HER PARENTS COME OVER AND CONVINCE HER TO MARRY HER

RAPIST.

THAT PART OF THE CULTURE SUCKS.

IT'S TOTALLY OUTDATED, YOU HAVE TO GET RID OF IT.

SLAVERY WAS PART OF OUR CULTURE.

WE HAVE TO GET RID OF IT.

WHETHER IT IS HASIDIC JEWS, MUSLIM FUNDAMENTALISTS OR

CHRISTIAN EVANGELICALS, WHAT BRINGS THEM TOGETHER IS NOT

THE RELIGION, IT WAS THE FUNDAMENTALISM AND DO SOME

FUNDAMENTALISTS REACT NEGATIVELY IN WAYS THAT ARE

COUNTERPRODUCTIVE AND THAT I DISAGREE WITH AND I THINK

ARE WRONG?

HELL YES THEY DO.

SO IF IT HAPPENS TO BE A HASIDIC JEW AND THAT CASE, JUDGING

WOMEN AND WHATEVER THEY ARE DOING AND IN THIS CASE, IF

SHE IS RIGHT, BUMPING HER BABY STROLLER WITH

HIS CAR?

WHY?

SHE IS NOT COVERED UP RIGHT?

SHE IS NOT IN YOUR RELIGION.

THE MUSLIM FUNDAMENTALIST, YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO DRAW

PROPHET MOHAMMED.

NO, YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO, I CAN DRAW WHATEVER I LIKE, I

AM NOT IN YOUR RELIGION.

SO ARE YOU ALLOWED TO CRITICIZE PARTS OF THE JEWISH

CULTURE?

YES, YOU ARE ALLOWED TO.

ARE WE ARE FREE COUNTRY OR NOT?

THAT IS NOT JUDGING JEWS OVERALL.

IF YOU DID THAT THEN I AM 1 BILLION PERCENT AGAINST YOU.

THERE'S A HUGE DIFFERENCE.

I'M GOING TO SAY SOMETHING THAT PROBABLY WILL RUB SOME

PEOPLE THE WRONG WAY AND THAT IS FINE, BUT I THINK IT IS

IMPORTANT TO TALK ABOUT IT.

I THINK THAT A LOT OF DIALOGUE IS CRIPPLED BY ACCUSATIONS OF

RACISM OR BIGOTRY OR HOMOPHOBIA OR TRANS-PHOBIA, WHATEVER IT IS

AND I THINK THAT HINDERING DIALOGUE IMMEDIATELY LEADS TO

STOPPING EDUCATION ABOUT IMPORTANT ISSUES AND I THINK WE

NEED TO TAKE A STEP BACK AND BY THE WAY, I MYSELF HAVE BEEN

GUILTY OF THIS IN THE PAST AND NOW I AM A LOT MORE COGNIZANT OF

WHAT I AM SAYING OR HOW I AM REACTING TO CERTAIN DIALOGUE

THAT I MIGHT FIND OFFENSIVE BUT MAYBE IT IS IMPORTANT FOR ME TO

KIND OF HEAR OUT WHAT THAT DIALOGUE IS AND THEN MAKE A

DECISION ABOUT WHAT I THINK.

IN THIS CASE, I FEEL LIKE I'M IMMEDIATELY WRITING HER

OFF AS ANTI-SEMITIC, FIRST OF ALL, ANTI-SEMITISM IS A

VERY HEAVY CHARGE.

RACISM IS A VERY HEAVY CHARGE AND I THINK BEFORE WE START

LABELING PEOPLE AS SUCH SIMPLY BECAUSE THEY WANT TO SHARE THEIR

PERSPECTIVE ON SOMETHING, WE NEED TO REALLY CONSIDER WHAT THE

RAMIFICATIONS OF THOSE LABELS ARE AND SO SHE EXPERIENCED

SOMETHING VERY REAL IN HER LIFE THAT SHE WANTS TO SPEAK OUT

ABOUT AND IF PEOPLE FEEL LIKE SHE'S GENERALIZING TOO MUCH I

THINK THERE'S A WAY OF APPROACHING HER AND TELLING HER

HEY, MAYBE YOU HAD THIS EXPERIENCE BUT IT IS NOT FAIR TO

GENERALIZE ALL HASIDIC MEN THIS WAY AND THEN HAVE A DISCUSSION

ABOUT THE CULTURE BUT THE MOST IMPORTANT THING TO TAKE AWAY

FROM THE STORY FOR ME IS THAT WE NEED TO STOP IMMEDIATELY

PREJUDGING PEOPLE BASED ON THE EXPERIENCES THAT THEY WANT

TO SHARE WITH THE WORLD AND THE DIALOGUE THAT THEY WANT TO HAVE.

I HAVE A SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT TAKE, AND TO ME, LOOK THESE ARE

HARD QUESTIONS.

JUST BECAUSE YOU SHOULDN'T IMMEDIATELY JUMP TO

CONCLUSIONS DOESN'T MEAN THAT SOME PEOPLE AREN'T RACIST

OR THAT THERE ISN'T INSTITUTIONAL RACISM OR THE

SOME PEOPLE ARE NOT ANTI-SEMITIC.

FOR EXAMPLE, THEN YOU GONE THE OTHER END OF THE SPECTRUM, ALEX

JONES TALKING ABOUT HOW BRIAN SELTZER AND MICHAEL WOLF ARE

GOING TO DRINK YOUR CHILDREN'S BLOOD AND THEY NOT ONLY RUN

THE MEDIA BUT THEY RUN THE BANKS.

THAT IS NOT SUBTLE.

THOSE ARE THE OLDEST HATEFUL ANTI-SEMITIC TROPES THAT

WE'VE SEEN THROUGHOUT THE WORLD SO YOU'VE GOT HAVE THE

COURAGE TO CALL THAT OUT AND NOT CALL IT EVEN AND NOT GO MAY

BE, DRINKING KIDS BLOOD, THAT IS THE OLDEST THING THAT THEY

SAID ABOUT JEWS IN EUROPE THAT LED TO PROGRAM AFTER

PROGRAM AND EVENTUALLY TO THE HOLOCAUST.

ON THE OTHER HAND, AND THIS IS WHY WE GET STUCK IN NO

MAN'S LAND, IT HAPPENS TO US ALL THE TIME.

TO THE BEST OF OUR ABILITIES WE THINK WE ARE TRYING TO BE

FAIR AND CALL THINGS AS THEY ARE.

YOU HAVE TO HAVE THE COURAGE TO NOT CALL THINGS EVEN EVERY TIME

DON THE OTHER HAND YOU CAN'T SAY JUST BECAUSE SOMEONE SAID

SOMETHING ABOUT HASIDIC JEWS ARE MUSLIMS ARE CHRISTIANS OR

WHATEVER IT MIGHT BE, THAT THEY ARE BY DEFINITION GUILTY.

HOLD ON, JUST MAKE A JUDGMENT CALL AND GO HEY, WHAT DID SHE

SAVE US THE JEWS, WHY DID SHE SAY THAT ABOUT SITTING JUICE?

WAS IT BECAUSE THEY ARE JEWISH

SO DID SHE SAY THEY'RE GOING TO DRINK YOUR KIDS BLOOD

THEN I WOULD BE LIKE NO, I CAN'T STAND HER BUT IF IN THE

CONTEXT OF FIGHTING FUNDAMENTALISM AND YOU ARE

JUMPING TO CONCLUSIONS, THEN YOU ARE WRONG.

I DON'T THINK IT'S A MATTER PREJUDGING OR NOT, IT'S A MATTER

OF MAKING THE RIGHT JUDGMENT CALL AND IT'S NOT A

BLACK-AND-WHITE WORLD AND HE GETS COMPLICATED AND WE HAVE TO

MAKE THOSE CALLS AND WE DO WITH TALKSHOW SO WE ARE CONSTANTLY

TALKING ABOUT THESE PEOPLE WHO ARE IN THE NEWS BUT I'M ASKING

EVERYBODY, KEEP AN OPEN MIND AND BY THE WAY, WE WALK THE WALK.

I SAID DON IVA SHOULDN'T GET FIRED WHEN HE SAID THE

RACIAL COMMENTS HE SAID BACK WHEN HE WAS ON CABLE NEWS.

OFTENTIMES I SHOULD SAY I SAY RUSH LIMBAUGH SHOULDN'T GET

FIRED I DO NOT AGREE WITH THEM, I CALL THEM OUT ON IT BUT

LET'S CONTINUE THE DIALOGUE.

ALTHOUGH IT BACK IN THE DAY I SAID THEY SHOULD HAVE

BROUGHT THEM BACK ON TV AND THEN BROUGHT IN THE PLAYERS, THE

AFRICAN-AMERICAN PLAYERS HE CRITICIZED AND HAD A DIALOGUE.

WOULD NOT BE MUCH MORE INTERESTING?

INSTEAD OF SHUTTING DOWN PEOPLE, LET'S GO BACK-AND-FORTH AND

IF YOU NEED TO CALL SOMEONE OUT, CALL THEM OUT.

BUT IF YOU NEED TO LISTEN TO SOMEONE, ALSO LISTEN TO

THEM AND HAVE A CONVERSATION.

For more infomation >> Actress Accused Of Anti-Semitism - Duration: 9:07.

-------------------------------------------

For more infomation >> Actress Accused Of Anti-Semitism - Duration: 9:07.

-------------------------------------------

News today: Latest news on North Korean peace talks & nuclear weapons program - Duration: 2:46.

For more infomation >> News today: Latest news on North Korean peace talks & nuclear weapons program - Duration: 2:46.

-------------------------------------------

For more infomation >> News today: Latest news on North Korean peace talks & nuclear weapons program - Duration: 2:46.

-------------------------------------------

The 11th Hour with Brian Williams 3/6/18 | Breaking News Today March 6, 2018 - Duration: 41:04.

For more infomation >> The 11th Hour with Brian Williams 3/6/18 | Breaking News Today March 6, 2018 - Duration: 41:04.

-------------------------------------------

For more infomation >> The 11th Hour with Brian Williams 3/6/18 | Breaking News Today March 6, 2018 - Duration: 41:04.

-------------------------------------------

Nhạc Thánh Ca Hay Nhất 2018 - Khúc Cảm Tạ - Thùy Dung - Duration: 5:38.

For more infomation >> Nhạc Thánh Ca Hay Nhất 2018 - Khúc Cảm Tạ - Thùy Dung - Duration: 5:38.

-------------------------------------------

For more infomation >> Nhạc Thánh Ca Hay Nhất 2018 - Khúc Cảm Tạ - Thùy Dung - Duration: 5:38.

-------------------------------------------

做贼还可以那么大声！限林冠英4天内道歉！巫统议员：否则法庭见！林首长神回他！ - Duration: 7:35.

For more infomation >> 做贼还可以那么大声！限林冠英4天内道歉！巫统议员：否则法庭见！林首长神回他！ - Duration: 7:35.

-------------------------------------------

For more infomation >> 做贼还可以那么大声！限林冠英4天内道歉！巫统议员：否则法庭见！林首长神回他！ - Duration: 7:35.

-------------------------------------------

ELHERA2 PARA KASMA TAKTİKLERİ | Elhera2 | Bölüm 2 | #Metin2 - Duration: 5:21.

For more infomation >> ELHERA2 PARA KASMA TAKTİKLERİ | Elhera2 | Bölüm 2 | #Metin2 - Duration: 5:21.

-------------------------------------------

For more infomation >> ELHERA2 PARA KASMA TAKTİKLERİ | Elhera2 | Bölüm 2 | #Metin2 - Duration: 5:21.

-------------------------------------------

@Kidactivis - Zombie

For more infomation >> @Kidactivis - Zombie

-------------------------------------------

Vlog #5: I'M ALIVE!!!!! - Duration: 3:29.

Hey guys it is Laura, my name is (messing up words) yeah it's Laura um... sorry that I have not vlogged in quite a while um...

Last Time I vlogged It was like Christmas Day um...

So Yeah

And I was gonna vlog on New year's eve and New year's Day But I kind of (Messing up words again) I kind of forgot and I was kind of Lazy at it

um... So yeah I am back with making another vlog Just telling you guys that I am back

And I am just sitting here um... organizing all of this um...

Just gonna be taking all of these movies out and then re-put them in like organizing them because I just feel like it and

In a few months me and my family are moving out of state & we have this habit of packing the last minute, now we are just trying something new.

and as i am doing all of this organizing I'm just watching supernatural on netflix

I am watching like the 3rd season and

The reason why i am watching this from the beginning is because oops hold on...

The reason why I'm watching it from the beginning is because I started watching the show from the middle

and I just did not.... and..... I don't know what the hell I'm saying

and I just felt like watching it from the beginning because I did not know how it started because I started in the middle, I don't really remember what season I started watching the show supernatural

So yeah I Just wanted to say that I am back

um... I'm just gonna continue organizing all of this and then continue watching supernatural

and.... yeah.... that's all I'm gonna be doing tonight, I'll see you guys later

For more infomation >> Vlog #5: I'M ALIVE!!!!! - Duration: 3:29.

-------------------------------------------

English Grammar: AUXILIARY VERBS – be, do, have - Duration: 13:08.

My name's Ronnie and I'm going to teach you some grammar.

It's kind of a... difficult grammar, but once you learn this overview of-dunh, dunh, dunh,

dunh-"Auxiliary Verbs", English grammar is going to become easier for you, I hope.

So, if you're just beginning to learn English grammar, oh, stay in there, you can do it.

Yuri, this goes out to you in Salvador, Brazil.

Let's keep going, man.

We have three auxiliary verbs that we use in English: "be", "do", and "have".

But the thing about the auxiliary verbs is that each auxiliary verb will tell us what

kind of grammar we're going to use with it.

So, let's look at the first one: "be".

So, "be" in its form in the present tense is "am", "is", "are"; negative: "am not",

"isn't", and "aren't".

These are present.

The past tense would be present...

Or, no.

The past tense in the positive is "was" and "were"; negative: "wasn't" and "weren't".

So, how do we actually use this auxiliary verb?

And the answer is: We use it in two forms of English grammar.

The first one is progressive.

So, if you have a progressive sentence, we have present progressive, past progressive,

and future progressive.

Every time we have a sentence in English with progressive, we know we're going to use the

verb "to be".

So, if our sentence is present progressive, we're going to use the present tense of the

verb "to be", "is am are" with a verb with "ing".

So, in English grammar, anything that's progressive or continuous is another word for the same

grammar, it's always going to be an "ing" on the verb.

The thing that changes and tells us the grammar is the verb "to be".

Present is: "is", "am", "are", plus verb "ing", but the past, we're going to use the past

tense: "was" and "were" plus verb "ing".

So, progressive will always have a verb "ing".

The thing that changes the tense of it is the verb "to be".

We have future progressive or future continuous.

In this one we're simply going to use the verb "will", so in this one we have "will

be" plus verb "ing".

For example: "I will be eating pizza."

This tells us what's going to happen in the future.

"I was eating pizza" was the past, and "I am eating pizza", something's happening now,

that's present progressive.

So, the progressive will always have the verb "to be", either past, present, or future,

and it will always have an "ing" on the verb.

Okay, cool.

Let's get more complicated, okay?

We have another structure in English grammar called passive.

Now, passive voice basically you're taking the action from the person or the focus on

the person, and we're putting it towards the activity.

So, in a normal English sentence we would say: "I eat lunch", but in a passive sentence,

we're taking away the subject and we're focusing on the action.

So, with the passive voice we have future passive, present passive, and past passive.

It goes along the same idea, is that the verb "to be" is going to tell us: Is it present?

Or if it's past.

When we use a passive sentence, we can only ever use the past participle of the verb,

or the third step of the verb.

So, passive will always be the verb "to be" plus the past participle.

If it's present, it's: "is", "am", "are", plus PP, past participle.

If it's past, it's "was" and "were" plus past participle.

It's hard to say the past participle, so I'm going to say PP.

I have to go PP.

So, as an example, we say: "Lunch is eaten", present tense.

"Lunch was eaten".

I'm going to step away and let you check that out.

Let your brain absorb it.

Make some sentences using this and the verb "to be".

If we used the future passive, I could say: "Lunch will be eaten", so again, when we're

using the future, we use "will be", but we're going to use the past participle.

Have you made some sentences?

Do it now.

Come on.

Make some sentences.

Go.

Okay.

So we've done the verb "to be".

And hopefully it's beginning to make sense, because English grammar rarely makes sense.

I'm going to make it make it make sense for you.

So, the next one is the auxiliary verb "do".

Now, this one's interesting because we only use it in the negative form in the simple

present, or we use it in the negative simple past.

So we don't have to worry about the positive, but we do use it for the negative in the simple

present and the negative in the past, and for questions.

So, let's check out first the simple present, or present simple.

We only use this auxiliary verb for the negative and the question form.

So, in the negative we're going to use subject, plus "don't" or "doesn't", plus the base verb.

Now, this is where English gets tricky and you have to remember that if it is "I", "you",

"we" and "they", we use "don't".

But if it's "he", "she", or "it", we have to use "doesn't".

So this is...

You always have to be careful with your subject and your verb agreement.

They have to agree.

So, as an example: "I don't like pizza."

If I used "he", I would say: "He doesn't like pizza."

And we have to be careful and use the base verb.

Okay?

The question would be: "Does he like pizza?"

Ar?

Like a dog.

If it's a question form, we put the auxiliary verb first: "do", "doesn't", subject, plus

the base verb.

Not the base verb, the base verb.

We also use this in the past simple, again, only with negative and only with a question.

So, the way that we change "did"...

Sorry, "does" into the negative is "didn't" in the past, but this is where we always make

a mistake.

I've told you English grammar is crazy, I'm not joking.

When we use "didn't", we always have to use the base verb.

So, this is where we get confused, because we think: "Ronnie, this is past tense."

So, if it's past tense, we have to use the past of the verb-mm-mm-because our auxiliary

verb "didn't" makes the sentence past.

So, if it's an auxiliary verb it's going to tell us if it's past or present, and we have

to use the base verb.

So, we have to say: "He didn't go home."

You cannot say: "He didn't went home."

That's grammatically wrong.

This verb tells us it's past, and this verb tells us it's present.

Oh, that's kind of cool when you learn it.

If you're doing the question form, it's very similar to this, past tense: "Did", subject,

plus your base.

Again, you always have to be careful.

Even though it is past, we actually have to use the base verb because the "did" or the

auxiliary verb tells us: "Hey, this is a past tense, not a present tense.

Please use the base verb."

So: "Did", "didn't".

Ah.

"Didn't" in the negative and "did" in the question.

Another tip when you are speaking English and you're asking someone a question, always

ask them a positive question.

It's more difficult for the listener, and for the speaker, and for everyone involved

if you use a negative question.

So, just for now, you're just learning this, always ask a positive question.

"Did I go home?", "Didn't I go home?"

The negative question is always much more confusing, and we need to make English grammar

simpler.

Ah.

We're almost done here.

I'm going to step away and let your absorb this.

Please make one, two, three, four sentences using the auxiliary verb "do".

And we're back with the last one, the last one, the most exciting one maybe ever.

Yeah.

This is the most exciting one.

We are going to use "have has", negative "haven't", and "hasn't", and then we have the past: "had"

and "hadn't".

So, when we use the verb as an auxiliary "have", we use it for perfect tenses in English.

They're so perfect.

So, when we use the perfect tense, our verb is always going to be the past participle,

just like in the passive.

So the passive and the perfects in English, we always use the past participle.

And again, we can have the future perfect, we can have present perfect, and we can have

past perfect.

So, the way we form the future perfect is we're going to use subject with "will", so

future we use "will" all the time, "have", and then the past participle.

Okay?

Or we can also use "has".

So, the future we use "will" plus "have", plus the past participle or the PP.

If we're using present perfect, we're going to use the subject: "have" or "has", plus

the past participle.

So, if you can think about this: "have" in the present tense is "have" and "has", so

in the past tense we're going to use "had" plus the past participle.

So, if we're using past perfect, we're using "had", plus PP.

If we're talking about present perfect, we're using "has" plus PP.

People get confused and a lot of people think that the present perfect is the present tense,

but it's not.

The present perfect talks about the past.

The thing that makes the verb present or past is our wonderful auxiliary verb: "have".

If the verb "have" is present perfect, we use the present tense of the verb.

If we use the past tense, if we use past perfect, we're going to use the past tense of "have".

So: "I haven't eaten lunch.

Oh, I'm hungry."

Future: "I will have played seven games", so we're using "will", "have", plus the past

participle.

If we use present perfect, we use: "he", "she", "it has eaten", "you already have eaten".

You have to be careful again on your subject and your verb agreement.

There're so many things to remember.

And then the past participle...

Or, sorry, the past perfect, all we're doing is changing "has" or "have" to "had".

And this one's cool, because we don't have to worry about "he", "she", and "it"; they

all use "had".

Thank you for being easy, past perfect.

If you have questions about these specific grammar points, if you don't know what these

grammar points are, if you want to know more detail about them, you know the website: www.engvid.com,

you can search in the search area and you can find exactly the grammar points and how

we use them.

But the thing that I need you to understand is the auxiliary verbs are going to help you

understand grammar easier I hope.

If you have questions, throw it to me in the comment box and I can help you.

Until next time, I'm out of here.

For more infomation >> English Grammar: AUXILIARY VERBS – be, do, have - Duration: 13:08.

-------------------------------------------

Mississippi Coding Academy funded with grants - Duration: 1:16.

For more infomation >> Mississippi Coding Academy funded with grants - Duration: 1:16.

-------------------------------------------

A Wave Of Change Rolling Through Colorado Caucuses - Duration: 2:03.

For more infomation >> A Wave Of Change Rolling Through Colorado Caucuses - Duration: 2:03.

-------------------------------------------

《旋風少女3》九月開拍，楊洋回歸，圈中最乾淨的女星出演戚百草 - Duration: 2:59.

For more infomation >> 《旋風少女3》九月開拍，楊洋回歸，圈中最乾淨的女星出演戚百草 - Duration: 2:59.

-------------------------------------------

ŻYCZENIA ŚLUBNE - zespół weselny/teksty/lyrics/songtexte/info.Konin sala Żak Smak Edu - Duration: 2:26.

For more infomation >> ŻYCZENIA ŚLUBNE - zespół weselny/teksty/lyrics/songtexte/info.Konin sala Żak Smak Edu - Duration: 2:26.

-------------------------------------------

The Dream Days [Part 5-(1/2)] EF - Daniel Brotons - Duration: 6:48.

No, no, no,... Let's not jump ahead

First of all, the begining of the story

And like everybody knows, one should not start by the end of it

So let´s start by telling you when she came to visit me in San Francisco

When she landed, there were some purple tulips waiting for her

which might have a specific meaning later on

Have you cried enough?

And I said "might" because plans are often unlikely to happen the way they were thought

But that is the best part of all of this

In only a weekend we had time to see it all

of course...walking

and walking in San Francisco means high hills

forbidden words for Ms. Vane

I'm going to be angry

The worst of all is that Vane gets angry when she needs to do a lot of exercise

then she might have some anger attacks

so at in any moment...

I just woke up

at any moment she might blow up

But who can live here?!

But of course, that was not even a problem to come again to lots of key points in the city

such as Lombard street,

or the Golden Gate

or even to find time for some places out of the schedule

Nane, where are we?

I don´t know. There is a red bridge!

She wants to touch the water

Let´s wait for her reaction

It´s cold, isn´t it?

Go ahead... go ahead...

I can´t feel them... I can´t feel my feet

And from here we continued to discover more of San Francisco

This time, the Pier 39

Built on Pier 39, hance it´s name

one can find all kind of shops

or even restaurants such as "Bubba Gump" from the movie "Forest Gump" among others

And one of the biggest attractions of the city:

the sea lions that live freely at the end of this pier

Going through a lot of places, that I won´t mention again, we finished on Castro District

one of the first gay neighborhoods in the USA

nowadays considered as one of the most important symbols in the LGBT activism in the whole world

In my opinion, one of the best places to live in, here in San Francisco, if one can afford it

From there we went to Dolores Park

the middle point between Mission and Castro

it's a wonderful and natural place alive at any moment

where one can chill or join anybody who is playing something

And to finish the trip

before saying eachother goodbye we visited Mission District

the latin neighbourhood of San Francisco

with a large hipster community, taquerias, tattoo shops and walls full of any kind of art

And that was all, we won´t see eachother again after three or four months

or that was what she thought.

For more infomation >> The Dream Days [Part 5-(1/2)] EF - Daniel Brotons - Duration: 6:48.

-------------------------------------------

egg curry/egg curry for rice/egg curry gravy/egg curry for chapathi/tomato egg curry - Duration: 10:08.

please like and share

please subscribe