DONALD TRUMP IS FIRED UP AND CANNOT WAIT TO GO AFTER
MORE PEOPLE AND OBVIOUSLY, HIS NUMBER ONE TARGET IS ROBERT
MUELLER, THE SPECIAL COUNSEL INVESTIGATING HIM.
WE'LL SEE A BUNCH OF TWEETS AS USUAL AND THEN I WILL
GO TO REPUBLICAN REACTION AND WE WILL SEE IF THEY ARE EVER
GOING TO HOLD HIM ACCOUNTABLE.
HE TWEETED RECENTLY:
HE THINKS THAT IS CLEVER WHICH
ALWAYS AMUSES ME.
FAKE NEWS IS NOT CLEVER AND IT ACTUALLY IS WHAT GOT YOU IN
OFFICE, YOUR SIDE USED IT.
FAKE MEMOS IS ALSO NOT CLEVER.
MCCABE WAS FIRED A LITTLE OVER DAY BEFORE HE WAS SET TO
RETIRE AND GET HIS PENSION AND A LOT OF PEOPLE THOUGHT THAT
WAS MALICIOUS.
IT IS NOT MALICIOUS IN TERMS OF HAHA, I WILL SHOW YOU, IT IS
ACTUALLY DONE WITH PURPOSE.
THE PURPOSE IS, SO IT IS NOT GRATUITOUS I SHOULD SAY.
IT IS MALICIOUS WITH INTENT AND THE PURPOSE IS MCCABE MIGHT
TESTIFY AGAINST DONALD TRUMP.
WITH THE EXTEMPORANEOUS NOTES THAT HE TOOK OF THEIR MEETINGS,
IT HE BACKS UP WHAT JAMES COMEY SAYS THEY COULD BOLSTER
THE OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE CHARGE AGAINST DONALD TRUMP
SO HE HAS SESSIONS FIRE HIM AND PRETEND THAT IT IS FOR LYING
UNDER OATH SO THAT HE CAN HURT HIS CREDIBILITY WHEN MCCABE,
THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR FOR THE FBI, TESTIFIES AGAINST TRUMP.
THIS IS ALL TO COVER HIM, IT IS TO DO DAMAGE CONTROL AND IT
IS FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE OF OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.
ANYONE WHO CANNOT SEE THAT IS PURPOSEFULLY BLIND.
YOU THINK THAT THE DAY BEFORE HE IS SET TO RETIRE, HE IS GOING TO
LEAVE ANYWAY, THAT ALL OF A SUDDEN THESE GUYS WERE WORRIED
ABOUT LYING?
SESSIONS LIED UNDER OATH ABOUT HIS CONTACTS WITH THE
RUSSIANS AND MCCABE'S UNDERLYING ISSUE WAS THAT HE DID A
LEAK, BUT IT WAS TO MAKE SURE THAT THE CLINTON
FOUNDATION WAS INVESTIGATED MORE, NOT LESS.
THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION IS REALLY ANGRY AT MCCABE FOR
INVESTING HILLARY CLINTON MORE?
WHO IN THEIR RIGHT MIND COULD BELIEVE SUCH NONSENSE?
OBVIOUSLY A MAN NOT IN HIS RIGHT MIND IS DONALD TRUMP AND HE
KEEPS ON TWEETING.
HE SAYS:
THE PEOPLE WHO CONCLUDED THERE WAS NO COLLUSION WERE
REPUBLICANS IN THE HOUSE, INCLUDING DEVIN NUNES WHO WAS
PART OF THE TRANSITION TEAM FOR DONALD TRUMP, SO HIS OWN TEAM
DECIDED THERE WAS NO COLLUSION, NO INVESTIGATOR HAS EVER
CONCLUDED THAT AND IS IT TRUE THAT THERE ARE 13 HARDENED
DEMOCRATS AND NO REPUBLICANS ON THE SPECIAL COUNSEL TEAM?
OF COURSE, NOT REMOTELY TRUE.
IN FACT, IT WAS ANNOUNCED BY THE PRESS, THEY'RE ALMOST ALL
REPUBLICANS, INCLUDING MUELLER WHO IS A REPUBLICAN.
COMEY WAS A REPUBLICAN.
THE CURRENT HEAD OF THE FBI, REPUBLICAN.
MCCAIN, BY THE WAY, BY ALL INDICATIONS, EVEN THOUGH
HIS WIFE RAN AS A DEMOCRAT, MCCAIN WAS A REPUBLICAN.
AS USUAL, ANOTHER OUTRAGEOUS LIE BY OUR PRESIDENT WHO
APPEARS TO BE A PATHOLOGICAL LIAR AND THEN HE PUTS OUT THIS
TWEET A LITTLE BIT LATER:
WITH NO CONTEXT.
IMAGINE IF OBAMA HAD DONE THAT ABOUT
THE BENGHAZI TRIALS.
THEY WOULD SAY HE LOST HIS MIND, WHAT KIND OF MANIAC WHO IS
THE PRESIDENT OF UNITED STATES IS ATTACKING EVERYONE AND
EVERYONE WOULD SAY HE'S WRONG.
THAT IS NOT THE QUESTION, WE ALREADY KNOW WHAT KIND OF A
MANIAC TRUMP IS.
THE QUESTION IS, ARE THE REPUBLICANS GOING TO DO ANYTHING
ABOUT IT IF TRUMP ACTUALLY GOES ONE LAST STEP AND FIRES MUELLER.
WELL, HIS LAWYER DOWD HAD SUGGESTED THAT HE MIGHT DO THAT.
HE HAD TO WALK IT BACK BECAUSE IT WAS NOT WELL RECEIVED, BUT
EVEN TREY GOWDY WHO IS A REPUBLICAN IN THE HOUSE, NOW A
LITTLE BIT FREER TO SPEAK HIS ACTUAL MIND, BECAUSE HE IS NOT
RUNNING FOR REELECTION SO HE IS NOT TETHERED TO THE DONORS, HE
SAYS:
I HAVE BEEN POINTING THAT OUT.
DOES ANYONE THINK TRUMP IS ACTING LIKE AN INNOCENT
PERSON?
WILDLY TWEETING AGAINST AND THREATENING TO
FIRE ANYONE WHO IS CURRENTLY INVESTIGATING HIM?
HE HAS EVERY TRAPPING OF A MASSIVELY GUILTY PERSON.
IN FACT, GOWDY CONTINUES AND SAYS:
THAT IS GOOD TO KNOW.
THEN YOU GO TO MARCO RUBIO.
HE WAS ASKED ABOUT IT AND HE SAID:
HE WENT ON TO SAY:
I WONDER WHY DONALD TRUMP IS SMEARING LAW-ENFORCEMENT?
YOU MIGHT WANT TO SMEAR LAW ENFORCEMENT IF THEY ARE
INVESTIGATING YOU AND THEY ARE RIGHT.
THEN, MANU RAJU FROM CNN CAUGHT UP WITH ORRIN HATCH AND
HERE'S HIS TWEET ABOUT THAT.
WE'LL SEE IF THAT'S TRUE BECAUSE IT MIGHT HAPPEN, BUT IT'S
GOOD TO SEE ORRIN HATCH SAYING THAT ON THE RECORD.
HE WENT ON TO SAY:
APPARENTLY HE HAS NEVER MET THE PRESIDENT BECAUSE HE HAS
ACTED OPPOSITE.
WE WILL ASK YOU GUYS ABOUT THAT IN A SECOND BUT WHY DON'T
YOU JUST PASS THE LEGISLATION SAYING THAT YOU CANNOT FIRE
THE SPECIAL COUNSEL?
YOU COULD DO IT TOMORROW BUT THEY WON'T.
JOHN CORNYN ALSO SAYS IT IS NOT NECESSARY, BUT HE SAYS:
I AM NOT SURE THAT I BELIEVE HIM BUT IT IS GOOD TO SEE ALL
OF THESE REPUBLICANS ON THE RECORD SAYING DO NOT FIRE
MUELLER.
IN FACT, LET'S GO TO NAPOLITANO.
HE IS NOT SITTING IN CONGRESS BUT HE IS A FOX NEWS
ANALYST AND THE GOOFBALL THAT IS OUR PRESIDENT ACTUALLY ONCE
CONSIDERED HIM FOR THE SUPREME COURT.
I'M GLAD HE DID NOT GO IN THE DIRECTION BUT I'M ALSO GLAD
TO SEE NAPOLITANO IS BEING PRINCIPLED HERE.
DO YOU THINK THE FIRING WAS VINDICATIVE AND RECKLESS?
I DO.
HOW COME?
BECAUSE ANDREW MCCABE IS MORE LIKELY THAN NOT TO BE A
WITNESS AGAINST THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S BOSS, THE
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.
I THINK THAT FIRING HIM IN THAT ENVIRONMENT COULD VERY WELL
BE INTERPRETED AS AN EFFORT TO DIMINISH HIS EFFECTIVENESS
AS A WITNESS.
WHAT IS THAT CALLED?
INSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.
BINGO.
THAT IS EXACTLY RIGHT.
THIS ISSUE IS MAKING FOR SOME REALLY STRANGE BEDFELLOWS.
RALPH PETERS TODAY QUIT FOX NEWS, HUGE WARMONGER BUT HE
IS SAYING LOOK, THEY ARE OBVIOUSLY COVERING UP FOR
TRUMP AND WEIRDLY, MANIACALLY, INCORRECTLY SO.
AND NAPOLITANO SAYING LOOK, IT IS OBVIOUS OBSTRUCTION OF
JUSTICE, ON FOX NEWS.
LET'S GO TO LINDSEY GRAHAM, HE IS REPUBLICAN SENATOR FROM
SOUTH CAROLINA.
AS I SAID BEFORE, IF YOU TRIED TO DO THAT, THAT
WOULD BE THE BEGINNING OF THE END OF HIS PRESIDENCY
BECAUSE WE A RULE OF LAW NATION, BUT WHEN IT COMES TO MR.
MUELLER, HE IS FOLLOWING EVIDENCE WHERE IT TAKES HIM AND
I THINK IT IS VERY IMPORTANT HE BE ALLOWED TO DO HIS JOB WITHOUT
INTERFERENCE AND THERE ARE MANY REPUBLICANS WHO SHARE MY VIEW.
THOSE ARE STRONG WORDS BUT THEN LATER HE WAS ASKED, BUT DO
YOU MEAN IMPEACHMENT?
AND HE SAID YES.
IMPEACHMENT WOULD BE AN OPTION.
AN OPTION IF HE WERE TO FIRE MUELLER BUT THAT IS APPARENTLY,
ACCORDING TO HIM, FOR NOW, WHAT HE SAID WAS THE IMPLICATION.
NOW LET'S GO TO CHARLIE DENT, HE IS ANOTHER RETIRING
CONGRESSMAN WHO IS A REPUBLICAN IN THE HOUSE.
AND IF HE IS RELIEVED, I WILL TELL YOU, THAT WOULD BE THE
EQUIVALENT OF A SATURDAY NIGHT MASSACRE JUST LIKE WHEN
ARCHIBALD COX WAS FIRED DURING THE NIXON YEARS.
THEY WOULD BE THE END OF THE PRESIDENCY.
>I DON'T KNOW WHO BE THE END OF THE PRESIDENCY BUT BOY, IT
WOULD
SET OFF, I JUST THINK IT WOULD BE CATASTROPHIC ON MANY LEVELS
POLITICALLY.
IT WOULD BRING WASHINGTON TO A STANDSTILL.
THAT'S WHAT WOULD BE THE WHOLE ISSUE, WE WOULD BE FIGHTING
OVER, HOW DO WE LET THE INVESTIGATION PROCEED?
ANY
OTHER BUSINESS WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO GET DONE SO IN MANY RESPECTS,
IT WOULD THROW US INTO A COMPLETE AND UTTER STALEMATE.
LINDSEY GRAHAM MAY BE RIGHT, MAYBE IT DOES END THE
PRESIDENCY.
I AM HEARTENED BY REPUBLICANS SHOWING A REDLINE ON THAT ISSUE
AND I THINK THOSE ARE GOOD, STRONG, WORDS AND HE
SHOULD GET CREDIT FOR IT BUT HOW MANY RETIRING CONGRESSMEN ARE
THERE?
HOW MANY PRINCIPLED REPUBLICANS ARE IN THE COUNTRY.
IF THEY ARE SO PRINCIPLED, WHY NOT PASS A LAW RIGHT NOW?
YOU CANNOT FIRE THE SPECIAL COUNSEL.
IT IS EASY.
EVEN LINDSEY GRAHAM SAYING YOU SHOULD NOT FIRE HIM
WITHOUT A CAUSE.
OF COURSE HE'S GOING TO HAVE A CAUSE,
HE'S GOING TO SAY CONFLICT OF INTEREST AND HE WAS WORKING
WITH MCCABE NAD COMEY AND THEY WERE PRO-HILLARY OR MAYBE
THEY WERE ANTI-HILLARY IN THE LAST PREPOSTEROUS FIRING,
IT DOES NOT MATTER.
THEY'RE GOING TO FIND AN EXCUSE.
BY THE WAY, AS COURSE AS USUAL, THE CORPORATE DEMOCRATS --
REPORTED BY HUFF POST:
DO
YOU LIVE ON THIS PLANET, SENATOR FEINSTEIN?
WHEN HASN'T IT OBVIOUSLY BEEN A BAD MOVE FOR DONALD TRUMP?
HE HAS DONE 1 MILLION OBVIOUSLY BAD MOVES.
THEY KEEP THINKING THAT HE IS AN HONEST ACTOR.
ARE YOU INSANE?
SO WHEN FEINSTEIN WAS REMINDED THAT THERE IS A PROGRESSIVE
WHO IS RUNNING A PRIMARY AGAINST HER SHE THEN BACKPEDALED,
YEAH, SURE, I GUESS SO.
I FORGOT I WAS SUPPOSED TO BE PRETENDING TO HOLD POWER
ACCOUNTABLE AND PRETENDING TO DO RESISTANCE BUT HER INITIAL
INSTINCT IS YES OF COURSE, WE DON'T NEED TO PASS ANY LAWS
PROTECTING THE SPECIAL COUNSEL.
WHY WOULD DONALD TRUMP EVER DO SOMETHING THAT WAS A BAD MOVE?
OKAY, SIDE NOTE, VOTE FOR ALLISON HARTSON AGAINST DIANE
FEINSTEIN.
SHE IS NOT GOING TO DO LIGHT RESISTANCE, SHE IS NOT
GOING TO ASSUME THAT DONALD TRUMP HAS BEST INTENTIONS
WHICH IS MANIACAL.
BUT NOW, ONE LAST VIDEO FOR YOU GUYS.
THIS WAS RICK TYLER.
HE IS A REPUBLICAN CONSULTANT.
HE HAS A DIFFERENT TAKE ON WHAT THE REPUBLICANS WILL DO.
WATCH.
HERE'S WHAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN.
I'M GOING TO GO OUT ON A LIMB.
HE IS GOING TO FIRE ROBERT MUELLER.
YOU HEARD IT.
YOU KNOW WHAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN?
NOTHING.
THAT IS WHAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN.
THERE WILL BE NO RESPONSE IN THE REPUBLICAN LEADERSHIP.
WE GOT A SINGLE SENTENCE FROM THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE,
NOTHING FROM THE LEADERSHIP IN SENATE, A LITTLE BIT FROM
LINDSEY GRAHAM BUT IT IS WEEKS.
IT IS GOING TO HAPPEN.
HE IS GOING TO FIRE MUELLER EVENTUALLY, PROBABLY SOONER
RATHER THAN LATER BEFORE HE CAN GET ANY FURTHER ON WHAT YOU
JUST MENTIONED, MONEY LAUNDERING OR OTHER TANGENTIAL ISSUES.
WOW.
IT IS NOT EVEN 9:30
ON MONDAY MORNING AND RICK TYLER JUST KNOCKED MY SOCKS OFF.
I WAS NOT READY FOR THAT.
MAINSTREAM MEDIA DRIVES ME CRAZY AND SHE IS ACTUALLY ONE OF
THE BEST OUT THERE, SHE ACTUALLY DOES GOOD INTERVIEWS WHERE SHE
HOLDS PEOPLE ACCOUNTABLE, BUT ARE YOU REALLY SHOCKED BY THAT?
I LOOK AT PEOPLE IN WASHINGTON AND I THINK, WHEN DID
PEOPLE GET DETACHED FROM THE REST OF THE PLANET?
DONALD TRUMP, WOULD HE REALLY FIRE MUELLER?
OF COURSE, HE
JUST FIRED MCCABE.
HE FIRED COMEY AND ADMITTED ON NATIONAL TV THAT HE FIRED
HIM BECAUSE OF THE RUSSIAN INVESTIGATION.
WHY WOULD YOU BE SURPRISED BY THAT?
AND THE REPUBLICANS MIGHT NOT HAVE PRINCIPLES AND THEY
MIGHT BACK HIM ANYWAY?
OF COURSE.
OF COURSE.
LOOK, IT IS STILL AN OPEN QUESTION AND I AM DEEPLY CURIOUS
TO SEE WHAT THE REPUBLICANS ARE GOING TO DO HERE AND I'M
GOING TO ASK YOU GUYS IN A POLL.
IT IS TYT NETWORK.COM/ACCOUNTABILITY.
WHAT WILL THE REPUBLICANS DO IF TRUMP FIRES RUBBER MUELLER?
A: NOTHING, B: IMPEACHMENT, C: HOLD HIM
ACCOUNTABLE BY OTHER MEANS BUT I HAVE TO BE HONEST WITH YOU,
I DO NOT KNOW WITH OTHER MEANS WOULD BE, SO WHAT ARE THEY
GOING TO DO?
YOU HAVE BEEN A NAUGHTY BOY, WHAT ARE THEY GOING TO DO?
PUT IN A NEW SPECIAL COUNSEL?
CONGRESS CANNOT EVEN DO THAT, YOU NEED THE JUSTICE
DEPARTMENT TO DO THAT AND IT IS HIS JUSTICE DEPARTMENT.
THEY NEVER CLARIFIED HOW THEY WOULD HOLD HIM ACCOUNTABLE
IF IT IS AN IMPEACHMENT.
DO YOU REALLY THINK THAT THE REPUBLICANS IN MASS ARE GOING TO
SOMEHOW HAVE PRINCIPLES?
YOU MIGHT HAVE A COUPLE OF OUTLIERS
WHO GO WELL, I AM RETIRING ANYWAY, BUT REMEMBER, THEY
DO NOT CARE ABOUT PRINCIPLES.
THE FACT THAT THAT IS SURPRISING TO PEOPLE IN TELEVISION OR
THE PEOPLE IN WASHINGTON IS UNREAL TO ME.
THEY ARE NOT HONEST ACTORS.
THE SECOND PART IS, WHAT DO REPUBLICANS DO?
THEY FOLLOW ORDERS OF THE DONORS.
THE DONORS, SO FAR, ARE THRILLED WITH DONALD TRUMP.
HE JUST GAVE THEM TRILLIONS, AND AFFILIATES, TRILLIONS OF
DOLLARS IN TAX CUTS.
NOW IF HE DOES THINGS THAT DESTABILIZE THE MARKET THEN
YOU MIGHT HAVE A DIFFERENT VOTE AND THAT'S REALLY
POSSIBLE BUT FOR THE MOMENT BEING THE MARCHING ORDER
THAT THE REPUBLICANS WILL GET IS SHUT UP AND GET BACK IN LINE.
IF TRUMP FIRED HIM, I AM SURE HE HAD A VERY GOOD REASON AND
FOX NEWS WILL COME ON THERE AND TELL YOU, IT WAS ACTUALLY
MUELLER WHO HAD NO PRINCIPLES.
HE HAD CONFLICT OF INTEREST AND HE WAS THIS AND THE LEAKS
AND THE LYING AND THIS AND THAT AND THEY WILL INVENT 1000
DIFFERENT LIES ABOUT THE SPECIAL COUNSEL AND THEY WILL MOVE
ON WITH THEIR LIVES.
HOW COULD THAT POSSIBLY BE SHOCKING?
DO I HAVE IT AT ABOUT 50%?
DEFINITELY ABOUT 50%.
I'M NOT SAYING IT IS WRITTEN IN STONE AND IT MIGHT AGAIN
HAVE TO DO WITH WHAT TRUMP DOES IN THE MEANWHILE AND HOW
THE DONORS FEEL ABOUT THAT, BUT FOR PEOPLE TO BE SURPRISED
ABOUT THAT IS PREPOSTEROUS.
YES, HE CAN EASILY FIRE MUELLER AT ANY MOMENT AND YES, THE
REPUBLICANS MIGHT NOT DO A GOD DAMN THING ABOUT IT.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét