The Silence Is BROKEN!
Bill Clinton Makes MAJOR Announcement, He Calls For Return Of 'Decency and Trust'
In US Politics [Details]
On today's scene of "Incongruity Update," we discover previous President Bill Clinton
saying "we have to find a way to bring simple, personal decency and trust back to our politics."
No, truly.
Amid a speech at the Brookings Institution on Thursday, Bill stated, while alluding to
the late Israeli Prime Minster Yitzhak Rabin:
"I think, somehow or another, we have to find a way to bring simple, personal decency
and trust back to our politics.
[…] Can you imagine someone saying that today, in the world we're living in?"
Hold up.
Personal decency?!
Is it accurate to say that it wasn't Hillary Clinton, who broadly said on "60 Minutes"
in 1992: "I'm not sitting here, some little woman, standing by my man like Tammy Wynette."?
{But she did.)
Monica Lewinski, Jennifer Flowers, Juanita Broaddrick, Kathleen Willey, et al., were
not instantly accessible for input.
Putting aside today's legislative issues, Donald Trump, and the unbelievable existence
of Yitzhak Rabin, Bill Clinton lecturing about "personal decency in politics" is excessive.
What do you think about this?
Do not hesitate and write your thoughts in the comments section below.
SHARE the truth, be patriots!
Thank you for your attention.
H/T Independent Journal Review A Man Who Swore To Protect Obama's Life Just Dropped A MEGATON
Truth Bomb On America [Details]
At the point when a person who once secured your life turns on you, you know you've
accomplished something incorrectly.
To start with, we get an NSA informant who uncovers that President Donald Trump is "absolutely
right" to state he was being wiretapped.
That set off a lot of firecrackers in that spot.
At that point other government authorities begin leaving the woodwork, essentially telling
everybody that for the purpose of certainty, they wouldn't be amazed if Trump Tower had
been bothered.
Hell, some say they expected it.
The most noticeably bad might be yet to seek Barack Obama.
He could in all likelihood be the primary previous U.S. president to face lawful offense
accusations in a government court, which would send shockwaves through the Democratic Party.
Presently, here comes previous Secret Service specialist Dan Bongino, who served under both
President George W. Shrub and Obama, and he reveals some new insight into this entire
disaster.
Via Western Journalism:
"If Trump is accurate, and he was being wiretapped, I sincerely doubt he walked into
the FBI and said, 'Tell me about me being wiretapped,' Bongino said in a Facebook
Live video over the weekend.
'That's illogical, ridiculous.
He would be causing all sorts of problems for himself.
"The Secret Service does ECM sweeps, electronic countermeasures, where they go in frequently
and look for listening devices, radio frequencies, all kinds of things to make sure the president
or president-elect is not being, in fact, wiretapped or listened in on specific phone
lines.
' "
Bongino trusts the Secret Service "may have discovered something" amid one of their
consistent ranges, and after that told Trump.
Obviously, the media doesn't care for this story since it doesn't paint our president
as a raving nut case.
Be that as it may, hold up, more is to come: Not just does Bongino essentially say Trump
is right, he likewise claims to have more certainties on the circumstance, and he will
empty them, soon.
At last, he says:
"#ObamaGate is going to blow wide open this week."
Now, we have only one thing to ask: What wrongdoing DIDN'T Obama submit when he was in office?
It wasn't sufficient that he stole an untold measure of cash from American citizens to
store his grimy uber-liberal pet undertakings?
He needed to go keep an eye on Trump, as well?
Furthermore, who ELSE did he keep an eye on?
Yes, America requests answers, Barack.
What do you think about this?
Do not hesitate and write your thoughts in the comments section below.
SHARE the truth, be patriots!
Thank you for reading.
H/T Western Journalism, Dan Bongino Twitter Good RIDDANCE!
Another SWAMPER DRAINED, You'll Cheer [Deatils]
At the point when Bill Clinton was chosen in 1992 and started the difficult errand of
building his Cabinet, the press cherished his decisions.
Clinton's pics were said to be a portion of the best that had been set since the administration
of Jimmy Carter.
All things considered, it's the mainstream media' JOB to reveal to us what to think
and how to respond… they only level out conceded as much in a HUGE slip fourteen days
back.
In like manner, when Barack Obama was chosen, he made a whole establishment for the sole
motivation behind building a Cabinet that would be deserving of his own enormity.
Also, obviously, the media cherished it.
It wasn't much sooner than he and Biden had spent upwards of $13M on the Obama-Biden
Transition Project that utilized more than 450 individuals (remember that the Trump move
group comprised of 16 individuals and cost nothing to the citizen).
When we take a gander at the Bush 43 move, you will review that ALL of his decisions
were horrible and lacking.
Actually, they were the most exceedingly awful since Ronald Reagan and Richard Nixon (do
you see where this is going yet?).
Concerning Trump… well, we should simply say that you are all mindful of his bureau's
gathering.
Obviously, the gigantically one-sided liberal media has been gunning for Trump since the
get-go, as of late PROVEN.
Be that as it may, at any rate, onto the current point.
Amid these moves, it is completely typical for new presidents to clear house and begin
constructing new groups.
Clinton did it, Bush 43 additionally, Obama…
Be that as it may, the distinction is when Trump cleaned house, it was depicted as superfluous,
"ghastly", grimy governmental issues, remarkable (one of the Liberals' most loved
words) and malicious.
All things considered, if being great isn't right, I don't wanna be correct!
Independent Journal Review:
"Lori Scialabba is currently the acting director of the United States Citizenship
and Immigration Services (USCIS).
She has been with the USCIS since 2007, and has been the acting director before – from
December of 2013 to July of 2014.
Scialabba stepped up as acting director on Inauguration Day, but openly defied President
Trump shortly thereafter.
Scialabba's name then appeared on a list compiled by Breitbart News entitled, '8
More Obama Bureaucrats Trump Can Fire or Remove at Homeland Security.'
Her retirement announcement, sent via email to her staff on March 7, was published by
Breitbart News [.]
Scialabba had been working for the federal government since 1985, when she took a job
with the Department of Justice.
She has been working in immigration-related offices within the government ever since.
"
Long story short:
This was a LIFETIME government specialist who never held a genuine employment in the
private segment and who pointed a warped finger in the characteristics of Americans, addressing
them on their prejudiced conduct and guaranteeing that laws were twisted/softened to suit illegals
up a push to undermine the very lead of law.
She guaranteed that the new president's declarations did not have any significant
bearing on her and her office and she was generously made a request to withdraw.
Plain and basic.
It's another hit to unlawful freeloaders; Trump has been covering them up and thumping
them down in THAT division, that is for damn beyond any doubt.
What's more, America is, at last, getting solid.
No love lost to a parasitic bloodsucker on the backs of Americans all over.
I simply wish we weren't paying her in her retirement for whatever is left of her parasitic
life.
What do you think about this?
Do not hesitate and write your thoughts in the comments section below.
SHARE the truth, be patriots!
Thank you for your attention.
H/T Independent Journal Review H-BOMB!
Obama Voting Scandal ROCKS Washington, Dems Caught Swindling ! [Details]
Liberals were all extremely worked up about the Russians "helping" Donald Trump win
the election.
However, shouldn't something be said about Democrat election extortion?
Shouldn't something be said about when Democrats were found apparatus surveys and skewing comes
about?
That was the reason Americans were shocked when Trump won; the weighted and one-sided
surveys created by the mainstream media revealed to us it was basically unthinkable.
Furthermore, talking about the totally untrustworthy liberal situated media, these "journalists"
have been dumping dirty lies on the American open for a really long time.
Shouldn't we focus on that, as Trump is continually saying?
Presently, another question, and it's one Democrats will truly abhor:
Did Obama's Department of Homeland Security endeavor to threaten Georgia's Secretary
of State by breaking into its electronic systems?
It absolutely is by all accounts taking care of business that way.
Attempting to take after the paper trail of this profoundly exasperating endeavor by the
Federal government to spook a State's director is almost incomprehensible right now just
in light of the fact that there is no paper trail of which to talk.
In this way, to bail you out, here are the "Cliffnotes" rendition of this developing
outrage are as per the following:
1.
The Obama administration issues an order through the Department of Homeland Security which
designates all local and state election machinery as part of federal "critical infrastructure"
(TRANSLATION: Feds have complete control over election systems in every State!)
2.
Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp declares that he opposes such a designation
3.
After opposition begins to occur to such a designation, several "scans" of Georgia's
election network are blocked by its Firewall 4.
Directly leading up to November's election, there is an uptick in these "scans"
5.
The Obama administration, in a temper tantrum, pushes Department of Homeland Security Director,
Jeh Johnson, to unilaterally make the "designation" official
6.
Multiple State-level Secretaries of State (Republican & Democrat) protest such a move
7.
More "scans" are thwarted by Georgia's election systems Firewall
8.
Kemp tracks the "scans" to be originating from an IP address that matches the Department
of Homeland Security 9.
When Kemp asks Johnson about these "scans", the Director lies
10.
Johnson is now out of the DHS, but Inspector General Roth is now convinced that something
strange was going on behind the scenes and intends on exposing the truth
The Daily Caller:
"If Roth's investigation shows Johnson or his subordinates deliberately used federal
cybersecurity resources to penetrate a state election system in order to pressure a state
official over a policy dispute, it could represent a significant scandal for Johnson and for
the outgoing Obama administration.
The 'scans' are attacks to test security weaknesses in a network.
It's called the electronic equivalent of 'rattling doorknobs' to see if they're
unlocked – or on a darker side, to send a message to a recipient.
DHS can not launch scans without the permission of state officials.
Kemp, in a December 8 letter to Johnson noted, 'At no time has my office agreed to or permitted
DHS to conduct penetration testing or security scans of our network.'
The attacks against Kemp's network – which also contains corporate information of registered
companies in the state as well as professional licenses – began on Feb.
Second
The last effort to penetrate the Georgia system, which Kemp called a 'large attack,' occurred
Nov. 15, a week after the election but before the state certified its results.
"
This has all the earmarks of being business as usual for the Obama organization and its
authorities.
Backpedaling the distance to the starting eight long years prior when individuals like
Van Jones and Cass Sundstein were included in shocking conduct and exercises in the background,
clearly naughty and underhanded execution of government power and specialist was a negligible
idea in retrospect with these sorts of czars.
Keep in mind when we discovered Hillary Clinton earned 800,000 illicit votes in the race?
Definitely, well, perhaps that is not every one of the Democrats did to guarantee a few
votes in favor of their side.
Ideally, between Representative Jason Chaffetz and IG Roth, we'll conceivably get to the
base of this forsakenness of obligation with respect to Homeland Security and through and
through lawbreaking with respect to Barack Obama.
As usual, I'm not cheerful.
Be that as it may, I would euphorically welcome another day in Washington.
What do you think about this?
Do not hesitate and write your thoughts in the comments section below.
SHARE the truth, be patriots!
Thank you for reading.
H/T The Daily Caller
Nancy Pelosi With RIDICULOUS Demand To Paul Ryan, She Sent Stern Letter With An IRONIC
Line That …
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) as of late sent a stern letter to House Speaker
Paul Ryan, addressing him about the privilege of the American individuals to know the "full
impact" of the GOP's new human services enactment before it's passed by Congress.
"The American people and Members have a right to know the full impact of this legislation
before any vote in Committee or by the whole House," Pelosi composed.
The incongruity was not lost on anybody that Pelosi, years back, had a very different logic
while smashing Obamacare through Congress.
Pelosi scandalously said in 2010:
"But we have to pass the bill so you can find out what's in it, away from the fog
of controversy."
Despite the fact that Pelosi has never possessed the capacity to experience that remark down,
she has protected herself in the past and asserted she was taken outside of any relevant
connection to the issue at hand.
This is what she said she truly implied by the remark in 2012, per The Washington Post:
"In the fall of the year," Pelosi said today, "the outside groups … were saying
'it's about abortion,' which it never was.
'It's about' death panels, " which it never was.
'It's about a job-killer,' which it creates four million.
'It's about increasing the deficit'; well, the main reason to pass it was to decrease
the deficit.
"Her contention was that the Senate" did not have a bill.
"And until the Senate produced an actual piece of legislation that could be matched
up and debated against what was passed by the House, no one truly knew what would be
voted on.
"They were still trying to woo the Republicans," Pelosi said of the Senate leadership and the
White House, trying to "get that 60th vote that never was coming.
That's why [there was a] reconciliation [vote] "that required only a simple majority.
"So, that's why I was saying we have to pass a bill so we can see so that we can show
you what it is and what it is not," Pelosi continued.
"It is none of these things.
It's not going to be any of these things.
"She recognized that her comment was" a good statement to take out of context.
"But the minority leader added," But the fact is, until you have a bill, you can not
really, we can not really debunk what they're saying …. "
At that point, there's likewise the way that the Affordable Care Act was passed hotly
by Senate Democrats in a late night Christmas Eve vote in 2009.
In any case, now the tables have turned, and Republicans control the White House, Senate
and House of Representatives.
There's little Democrats can do to prevent the GOP from completing their motivation.
What do you think about this?
Do not hesitate and write your thoughts in the comments section below.
SHARE the truth, be patriots!
Thank you for reading.
H/T Independent Journal Review
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét