*coming into frame humming the Battlefield theme
*Sigh*
#Everyone'sBattlefield
*Different angry opinions on Reddit and Twitter rambling*
*Intro*
So, I'm super late into making this video covering the release of Battlefield V
but as you know the saying goes, "Better late than never".
However, being on time and always on time is still much preferable.
So, it looks like the reveal of Battlefield V is finally here and EA and DICE are going back to World War 2.
In what is the most authentic and technologically advanced portrayal of World War 2 in a video game yet.
And all this was revealed in a live stream hosted by Trevor Noah, comedian, and host of the very politically neutral
like all the other late-night talk shows that aren't milking the current presidency...
The Daily Show.
Now I'm not a hater of Trevor Noah even though I disagree with him on a lot of his political stances
I do genuinely find some of his stand-up hilarious and I do laugh at most of his jokes
Most....
Battlefield "Vee" could be V why not V?
Yeah, my name is actually pronounced Trevor V or Noah.
Holy shit without a writer team his attempts at comedy for this reveal was so cringy.
WTF how is this funny?
HOOOOW?????
*Filthy Frank comes in and wants to kill himself*
IT'S TIME TO STOP
IT'S TIME TO JUST STOP
Really? This is him playing?
staring a painting of a white horse
couldn't they at least show him engaged in some action in the game?
Now I wanna give Trevor Noah the benefit of the doubt
and believe that maybe he's played a lot of the Battlefield games, and is a fan of the series
but still, most of the people in the Battlefield community probably didn't know who Trevor Noah is
and were probably scratching their heads wondering who this guy is.
There were lots of other people who were better candidates to be the host of the BFV reveal
such as JackFrags, LevelCap, Neebs from Neebs Gaming, Matimi0, Westie and XFactorGaming.
Okay, I understand EA needs to appeal to the younger demographics because Trevor is popular with the kids
but still, they're ignoring the rest of the community with this corporate B.S.
Huh Huh Huh, look at how cool and relatable we are by getting famous people to present our products hugh.
*Jesse Wellens having no idea what to say of stage during E3 2017*
Except for Terry Crews, that guy is awesome.
[Sound of Crew's Manliness]
Okay I get it, just because they've made content about Battlefield
doesn't mean they're natural presenters and wouldn't struggle to host and present on stage
Even plenty of them don't even show their faces in their videos often
so it might feel a little jarring having them show up on stage in person and present for 30 minutes straight.
But at least you could have gotten Neebs and Engineer from Battlefield Friends, I mean they would have definitely kicked ass on stage.
*WHISPERING INTO MIC: AND ALSO, NEEBS AND JONNY APPSRO, IF YOU'RE WATCHING THIS I MISS BATTLEFIELD FRIENDS
SO MUCH PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE COME BACK FOR BATTLEFIELD V PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE T.T
[FUCK YOUR FAT FACE!]
[Anthony from CutureShock cries]
Okay so yeah, the reveal has been over a month ago since making this video
so there's no point talking about it anymore
I just hope DICE hears from the community and improves their next reveal conference
if this is the route they are taking for the reveal of future Battlefield games.
So now, here's my first reactions to the reveal:
when I woke up early catch the reveal live,
since I live halfway around the world from L.A
and saw Trevor Noah presenting on stage and trying to be funny with the Battlefield "V" thing.
[Filyhy Frank Returns Wanting To Kill Himself]
*Noises of cringe and disgust
I knew where this reveal was gonna go.
Then came the panel where Trevor sat with the producers of BFV and give a
a talk show like interview with them.
Now I didn't really like this style of presentation as it did feel much slower paced
than just directly telling us what the game is about,
what new mechanics are added into the game
and what new content is also added into Battlefield V
With Trevor Noah interjecting after every sentence said by the producers
it just really bogs down the pacing of the reveal.
I'm sorry EA, at least Activision's live stream reveal of Black Ops 4 was better
I'm not gonna jump into the Call of Duty V.S. Battlefield bandwagon, I play both, but I do like Battlefield more.
Now let's just ignore the chit-chatting part and take a look at some of the screenshots that were shown during to live stream
leading up to the reveal trailer.
*Sounds of cringe and disgust again
Now I have no problems with women in video games and in fact,
some of the most compelling video game characters ever are female,
but DICE is not being subtle about it
they're even putting it up on their front cover of BFV.
Which when I first saw, reminded me of some fan made wallpaper back in 2011
for Battlefield 3 where a girl was edited onto some BF3 artwork,
I didn't think DICE would do something similar just 7 years later.
[Huh]
This is not the first time a woman has been on an official Battlefield poster I think
with the first time being the female sniper from The Name of The Tsar DLC.
But I guess because the female soldier the BFV poster
looked a lot more effeminate than the one that was in BF1 poster
the one in the BFV poster just feels a little bit off and weird.
What my problem is and what many members of the Battlefield community have a problem with
is how much better DICE could have showcased women in the game
especially with the Russian faction and French resistance fighters.
BUT MUH IMMERSION MUH IMMERSION
Okay so yeah, maybe it's not right
to want to see some authenticity and historical accuracy in video games
after all, you are coming back every 10 seconds after each death
not going down after one shot most of the time
and also doing things like leaping out of jets and sniping the enemy pilot chasing you.
But of course, you can never truly mimic the gameplay of every war or battle your game is trying to replicate,
[US MARINES OORAAH]
even the experience of mil-sims like Arma and Squad
have some discrepancies to real life combat
that anything more real
you would have to volunteer as a foreign fighter in Syria with the Kurds.
But here comes the argument of thematic authenticity, something that games are able to accomplish.
Things such as the uniforms, voices, languages, environments,
settings, timelines, weapons, and themes & tones are things
the developers are able to do help players suspend their disbelieve,
and actually, feel absorbed into the game's setting.
That's why thematic authenticity is important,
immersion is also an important aspect in creating a great gaming experience.
Having soldiers running around on the frontlines in jackets and tank tops
that might have been worn casually while off duty but definitely not during combat
can break our suspension of disbelieve
disbelieve - that this is a second world war game that we're playing in.
If you look back at some of the previous Battlefield games,
such as Battlefield 3, though the gameplay itself may not have been entirely realistic
the theme of the game tries to emulate the real military
with uniforms, weapons, dialogues, and sound.
Now I'm not saying that every game must be realistic and look like the real thing
what the real problem is, is that DICE and EA
are claiming this to be an authentic portrayal of the deadliest conflict in human history
but then introducing flamboyant outfits and cosmetics, so they're not being really honest now are they?
Now I know some fellow community members on r/Battlefield
Which became a metastasizing cancer for the few weeks after the disastrous reveal
have posted pictures of the steampunk looking prostatic arms existing in real life
during the war's era, and the unusual face paint seen in the reveal was used by the 101st Airborne.
But still, its very unlikely the prostatic arm was used in combat
as I highly doubt you could just as easily carry and pull the trigger of the rifle with it.
And the usage of the face paint was quite limited to the paratroopers of the 101st Airborne,
who used the face paint as more of a symbolic gesture,
inspired by the Native American heritage of one of their own member's.
If DICE said from the get-go that they are taking artistic liberties in the portrayal of World War 2
with the steampunk looking prosthetic arm, face paint and jackets, there wouldn't have been any backlash now would there?
Another argument about authenticity, also comes from how one would perceive a setting to look
when they think of World War 2.
Lots of us grew up with a very good idea of how World War 2 looked liked
shows and movies such as Band of Brothers, The Pacific, Saving Private Ryan, Generation War, Dunkirk
and lots of History Channel shows, that had a weird craze during the mid-2000s
about World War 2, and conspiracy theories about Hitler,
when they were actually making shows about history and not this....
[STAY WOKE STAY WOKE STAY WOKE]
Here comes my second biggest issue which comes from mostly the trailer
as this won't be such a big issue once the game is out
but with the serious but goofy at the same time tone they were going for in the trailer
it just doesn't work very well. Sometimes you just have to go all out or none at all.
First impressions are always paramount;
for me as a Battlefield fan I might get this game anyways
because I do love this franchise despite its flaws
but for other people who has never heard of this franchise, or have never played any of the games
and is considering getting the next upcoming instalment of the Battlefield series
This trailer and the negative reaction by the internet at large
may have very well dissuaded potential newcomers
which might impact the overall player base at the release of this game.
Now I've always been a huge fan of the Battlefield trailers since I was introduced to this series since 3
and the formula for Battlefield trailers have always been for a while now
lots of action and explosions taking place to showcase its epicness and spectacle
and I get what DICE was going for; for this trailer
but sadly trying to have so many things playing out in one sequential take
instead of cutting though different scenes and moments just like previous trailers did
just ends up as a confusing mess.
Well looks like DICE learned their lesson from the E3 trailer
and probably fired the guy that directed the first trailer.
Maybe one of the other factors to the confusing mess of the trailer
was due to the guy who originally directed the Battlefield 1 trailers leaving DICE.
As a Battlefield fan, I don't believe Battlefield V will be a bad game.
There seem to be lots of gameplay improvements being added into the game
things such as no more visible recoil, more solid gunplay, bullet penetration, advance movements
reworked suppression, animated revives and
NO PREMIUM PASS.
You know, this seems like a route DICE is taking as they did with Battlefield 4:
if you ask me, Battlefield 4 was similar game to Battlefield 3,
it was a modern setting, and they almost had all of the same gameplay elements.
However BF4 had improvements over BF3
such as spawning,
the removal of the blue tint BF3 had
and I'm looking at you Operation Metro
and also the addition of a shit-tonne more customizations for guns, uniforms, and vehicles.
However, one thing they fucked up for Battlefield 4, was its disastrous launch
with terrible hit registration, server lag, unstable servers, crashes
[Angry Joe Freaking Out Over BF4 Crashing]
and terrible rubber-banding, Oh my god.
[Medic Fucking Dies]
They fixed it all about 2 years later after post-launch so it was all good in the end
Looking at the gameplay at E3 so far
[BURP]
[fuck]
Looking at the gameplay at E3 so far
in my opinion, it does look similar to Battlefield 1 but with extra gameplay mechanics
such as fortifications, and enhanced physics-based destruction
with no more of that pre-determined animations for buildings to come down
So I do believe that Battlefield V will be for Battlefield 1, like what BF4 was for BF3:
a step up from its previous installment.
The biggest news for me to come from the Battlefield V reveal
was indeed the removal of premium pass, and the paywall for post-launch content for the game.
This was my biggest caveat with the Battlefield series, and pretty much every multiplayer shooter out there,
that had season passes for additional maps and guns that were to be added into the game post-launch
I know the development of these maps do take some additional resources
and time from the developers, but really?
Another $60 dollars, which is the price of a full game for 16 more maps?
And I'm looking at you Call of Duty.
But here's my biggest worry about the removal of premium pass:
DICE has said that the single player war stories won't be available for Battlefield V at launch
but instead be available down the line after the game's release
And of course, Battlefield has always been a multiplayer focused game
so it's no big deal that we're not getting a single player at launch
at least war stories will still be coming unlike Black Ops 4
which is not even getting a single player campaign at all
[Low Level Laughter]
But here's what I'm concerned about:
Since EA is no longer charging for DLC
that means no direct revenue is being made with the production of post-launch content.
Does that mean that there might be a lacklustre of content at launch
and that despite DLCs being free, will the release schedule
of BFV's DLC be sluggish like Battlefield 1 all over again but even worse?
Many have complained about the lack of content Battlefield 1 came with at launch
and the player base soon took a deep dive, months after launch.
The extremely slow DLC release schedule exacerbated the problem
Of Battlefield 1's dwindling player base.
And I'm worried that this might repeat all over again for Battlefield V.
Seeing how the player base of Battlefield 1 dropped, if Battlefield V does release
with even lesser content than it would've with premium
and if there's going to be lesser DLCs despite the DLCs being free
would the lack of content be worth the removal of premium pass
and would we see the player base for this game drop as bad as Battlefield 1 did?
These are major concerns I currently have with the status of Battlefield V
and hopefully, DICE addresses them the following months leading up to the game's release.
Maybe that's why we're seeing DICE doing this with the flamboyant cosmetics in the game
this was a ploy was to sell cosmetic items to earn some extra cash for the game
post-launch, and if DICE does keep their promise from making Battlefield V
pay to win and only permit microtransaction for cosmetics and cosmetics only
then I'm fine with it.
[OOOH]
[OHH]
[FUCKING SCREAMS]
So, I guess ultimately, all these skins are what will allow DLCs to be free
and if that's also the price, I'm okay with it.
But I would still much prefer if DICE didn't throw in all these items
that just didn't fit in well for the majority of the war.
We might hate greedy game publishers out there conducting unethical business practices such as loot boxes,
pay to win micro-transactions, and the rush to jump on whatever is popular for the current year
but after all, EA is still a business
and without them there wouldn't be a platform for their studios to have their projects funded and published
so do correct me if I'm wrong but
I believe game publishers are a necessary evil, an evil that just needs to be kept in check
and earn as much money as possible to keep funding the development of projects for high -budgeted, well-produced video games possible.
Again, again I'm not trying to defend them but really?
EA as the worse company in America?
There are other corporations and companies out there that even much worse and evil
like: big pharma, food, oil, telecommunications, airlines
[THANKS FOR FLYING DELTA AIR]
and banks doing actual harm to people and society, but nooo
It's EA, a game company?
This is why I do sometimes despise this
dogmatic - hivemind hate culture on the internet
where everyone's gotta hate or like something because everyone else does
and if you don't, you're just too stupid to get or understand everyone else.
I admit I'm also guilty of participating in such behavior too sometimes
and I'm not saying the internet is always wrong to hate on something
as usually, it comes from the fault of the party they're hating.
All I'm saying is that sometimes you have to know and understand why you hate something
and be analytical and objective about it
instead of mindlessly following what everyone else is doing in this current mob mentality culture.
[STAY WOKE]
[STAY WOKE]
[ALL HAIL DADDY JONES]
[STAY WOKE]
I'm so sorry for the sidetrack, but anyway let's get back to it.
"If you want an authentic World War 2 gaming experience why not play Post Scriptum or Day of Infamy?".
Well that's true and I did play Day of Infamy
and I do plan on getting Post Scriptum once its out
but the thing about these games
is that no other studios make video games like DICE does
DICE has always been high end when it comes to the production and development of their games
and they're able to make some of the highest fidelity and technologically advance shooters out there in the market
with great graphics, animations, music and sound design.
So when it was announced that the next Battlefield game was going do World War 2
what I pictured in my mind was scenes of Allied soldiers storming the beaches of Normandy
or Japanese troops Banzai charging American machine gun emplacements on the islands of the Pacific,
all done in the breath-taking render of the Frostbite engine
The thought of a true authentic Second World War experience
done in the Frostbite engine excited my mind and having one done by DICE?
That would have been a dream
but sadly DICE and EA wanted Battlefield V to have mass appeal
And have all these immersion breaking cosmetics in the game.
The weapons and vehicle do seem time appropriate
but so far from what I've seen, not much have been shown about the game so far that screams World War 2
this brings us back to the point of thematic authenticity again
aesthetics and scenes that enforce a strong sense of what setting the game is set in
the jackets and robot arms just make it hard to associate BFV with World War 2.
[DICE's Response]
Since the reveal of the Battlefield V trailer,
there seems to be a very huge split amongst the Battlefield community.
I believe this might very well be the most divisive reveal ever in Battlefield history.
Now I just want to say that I've been extremely disappointed with DICE
when it came to how they've responded to the community
that has expressed legitimate concerns with how the franchise was changing
Now of course, after all this is a video game and not a history documentary
to those who are saying that they're re-writing history
there would be no way DICE could be re-writing history with a fictional piece of media.
But here's what DICE is doing that is really rustling my jimmies.
It's very obvious that DICE's motive to add women into this game is politically driven.
I mean c'mon guys its Sweden
the very state teaching their pre-school kids about gender fluidity
before they've even hit puberty
and also, the very state allowing returning ISIS fighters back in with open arms.
I mean c'mon Sweden! You guys used to be fucking Vikings! What happened?
Angry Foreigner: Because you see, Sweden
Is what Tumblr would look like if it was a country
Except for Sabaton, that band is fucking awesome.
[Primo Victoria Plays]
And to top it off, the reveal was hosted
by the current host of one of the biggest political leaning late night talk show in America.
So yeah, it is very obvious that there is a political agenda by DICE
for this current year of Battlefield.
Also, don't believe me?
Let's take a look at some of the replies by the CEO of EA and DICE, Patrick Soderlund
These are people that are uneducated.
In Terrible Swedish Accent: They don't understand that [women in World War II] is a plausible scenario.
And listen, [Battlefield V] is a game.
Today, gaming is gender-diverse like it hasn't been before.
[Shitty Laughter]
Immitating Pewdiepie's Accent: Wow good job Patrick, call your fanbase uneducated and sexist.
And also, okay I'll just drop the fuckin' dump European accent
It's not even Swedish it's just fuckin'-
And we felt like in today's world—I have a 13-year-old daughter
and when the trailer came out and she saw all the flak, she asked me,
'Dad, why's this happening?' and she plays Fortnite,
and says - 'I can be a girl in Fortnite. Why are people so upset about this?'
She looked at me and she couldn't understand it.
And I'm just like, ok, as a parent, how the hell am I gonna respond to this,
and I just said, 'You know what? You're right. This is not ok.".
And also, here's a statement by the Game Manager at DICE, Oskar Gabrielson:
"First, let me be clear about one thing. Player choice and female playable characters are here to stay."
Wow, I mean why did you have to bring your daughter into this? She's 13
and the Battlefield games have always had a much more serious and visceral depiction of war and combat
even for the Bad Company series
Comparing Battlefield to Fortnite is a terrible analogy because these two games are extremely different.
And also, the Battlefield games are rated M18
your daughter shouldn't be playing such games yet….
Even though I did start playing Battlefield when I was 13
13 and that was what got me hooked onto the entire series.
Which is why I'm making this super long video, where the script has already been a nightmare to write.
And recording and editing this is only gonna be a lot worse.
Boi I do not look forward to it.
Look, Patrick Soderlund, I get that you're a caring father and want what's best for your daughter
but you shouldn't be making decisions that could affect the entire community's
enjoyment and experience of your game, just to appease your daughter
There have been plenty of multiplayer games in the past
that didn't allow complete customization of your character, and they turned out fine.
Hell, plenty of the older CoD games that were hailed as some of the best shooters ever
such as Modern Warfare, Black Ops, Modern Warfare 2, World at War, didn't let you play as a woman
or at least plaster women all over their game because they understood
that most of the people fighting in wars were men and having women running around the battlefield
can ruin the feeling that you're playing a game set in a real war.
When you use women in games as a marketing point for your products
you're doing it wrong.
Including women or any race, or minority group in your product
and only having them as merely a selling point in your game is tokenism.
Which of itself is a form a bigotry
as you're using someone's ethnicity or gender as a means to earn extra profit.
Also, please don't use your children as a tool to drive a political agenda
now I know this is about video games and not politics
but because DICE is getting political about this then I'm gonna get political about this too.
You see this being done all the time by both sides of the political spectrum
the "SOMEBODY PLEASE THINK OF THE CHILDREN!
BUT MY CHILD! MY CHILD!
AND IF YOU DARE THINK ABOUT CRITICISING WHAT POLITICAL STANCE I'M EXPRESSING
THEN YOU DON'T CARE ABOUT THE CHILDREN!
SCREW ACTUAL ANALYSIS AND OBJECTIVITY
FOR A SOLUTION TO A POLITICAL ISSUE JUST LOOK AT MY CHILD!"
Toddlers are pure uncorrupted by Fake News™ or homosexuality :3
They don't worry if it's politically correct to shoot a mentally deranged gunman
They'll just do it >:D
Now, of course, everyone wants to be right about their stance and opinions on everything
because of pride and ego
that's perfectly normal to have, but just not too much.
This children card thing just removes the opportunity to have a level-headed discussion
when it comes to anything.
Because now, nothing said by them can be criticized or questioned
or criticised or else you'll get branded as a children hating, racist or sexist bigot.
And I hate this tribalism mentality and it sucks.
Okay, since I'm gonna be making more videos and content in the future
and I wanna be myself and express opinions and thoughts that I truly feel.
I'm gonna be transparent from the get-go
and I'm just gonna state what side of the political aisle I personally identify on.
I...
[DRUMROLL]
I...
[DRUMROLL CONTINUES]
personally identify as a right-leaning centrist, with opinions on both the right and the left.
Okay, so now we've gotten that out of the way, let's talk about another thing Soderlund has sad:
"And we don't take any flak.
We stand up for the cause, because I think those people who don't
understand it, well, you have two choices:
either accept it or don't buy the game. I'm fine with either or. It's just not ok."
[LAUGHS]
EA, EA listen, listen
ARE YOU SURE ABOUT THAT?
There you have it folks, another version for this year of EA's
"To be fair, you actually have to have a very high IQ
to understand providing players with a sense of pride and accomplishment".
Good job EA, good job.
2017: The intent is to provide players with a sense of pride and accomplishment
2018: ACCEPT IT OR DON'T BUY IT
So yeah, this is the kind of shitty SJW like behavior DICE and EA seem to be inhabiting now
and I'm very disappointed with them
but at the same time, I kinda saw this coming.
Now I won't pull off the
"but c'mon it's the current year guys" card
but I will say this
c'mon guys we're reaching the end of the 2010s
and in this current political climate
the whole equation just screams for EA and DICE to falter to the SJWs.
Okay let's get rid of the politics for now and talk about what DICE has decided to do for Battlefield V
after hearing the suggestions from you: the community.
After all DICE does listen to their fans and have implemented features
in the pass through community feedback.
Which improved their games and made being part of the community a lot more enjoyable.
[You'll get something I know a lot of you have not been asking for but we wanna make money anyways]
[Lars Gustavsson: MMMHHHHM]
It's
Royale
[Sound of people in the audience booing and Lars Laughing nervously]
What? No! No!
What are you doing? This was not what the community asked for DICE
No
No
In fact, this was what so many of us was NOT wanting for.
This is just you trying to jump on the bandwagon of a popular trend that
will just die out in a few years.
This is just you wanting to cash-in on the BatteruRoyare genre
because all the other companies are making big bucks
over at what is now an over-saturated
and formulaic genre filled with kids, and loud microphone muffling Chinese people.
But if you don't like it
don't play it
Fine, but here's an issue with DICE adding battle royale
whether or not we play it
the developmental resources used for the traditional multiplayer game modes
would have been taken away to develop the Battle Royale mode
and since DICE has confirmed that they are going to do it now, I just hope that the mode is good
and doesn't turn out to be an expandable throw away disaster
or else all that resources used to develop this mode by the studio was all for nothing.
So that's my worry about the battle royale mode.
Okay, looks like everyone has been talking about a very brilliant way to fix this whole cosmetics debacle
just have a client-side option for players to be able to disable all of the non-default cosmetics
in game if they don't want to see it
while the rest can keep the robot arms or what not in the game and everybody wins.
Surely this looks like a farely simple solution that won't be that hard to implement, right DICE?
[My attempt at a British Accent] In my interview today with Daniel Berlin, DICE dev
He confirmed at the moment there are no plans to implement a customisation kill switch
turing off all visual customisations in in #Battefield V
[SOUND OF TABLE SMASHING]
*Sigh Who am I kidding? This is EA we're talking about after all. They win, they'll always win…
[TV STATIC]
[EA: Evil laughter]
Gaben: It's not about winning, it's about fun
[Tumbling Sound]
[CAR TIRE SCREECH]
EA: What's that??
F is for Friends who do stuff together
[Transition To Trap Remix]
[In Conclusion]
So in conclusion! I've been a huge fan of Battlefield for a while now
even though I've been getting some fatigue with this series
I still want DICE to succeed and make great games.
As a Battlefield fan I will probably get this game anyways
as I believe that it would probably be a good game, even with the bullshit DICE and EA has putted it up with.
And also, I'm an aspiring game developer
who just graduated from game design school with a diploma in game design
but I won't be seriously pursuing working as a game dev soon
because I gotta serve in my country's military for 2 years in a few months time.
But after those 2 years I do want to be pursuing a career in game development
and when I became a huge Battlefield fan at 13,
my dreams since I was young was to become a developer at DICE to work on the Battlefield games,
a series I've became a huge fan of and sparked my entire childhood and teenage obsession
with firearms, first person shooters, war films, and just the military and warfare in general.
And I'm gonna be in the Army soon anyways, so I will get a fair share of plenty of that soon.
Even with its faults, DICE has always been producing high quality games,
production wise, always pushing as one of the best in visuals, animations, sound and design.
As a AAA studio, they want people who have experience
that have been doing games for a while now to meet their higher standards in game production.
And I do hope to meet their game developing standards someday
achieving my childhood goal of working on a future Battlefield title
maybe even Bad Company 3 by then.
But with this recent news of Sweden becoming an entire social justice state
and if DICE and EA continues with this down the line, making it worse and worse
I don't know if I ever want to work at DICE ever anymore.
I don't even know if I'll get lynched just for expressing slightly conservative views over there
Once I'm in Sweden or at DICE.
Count Dankula: And the one that is completely fucked
And I also don't know if this video is going to completely ruin my chance
of ever getting hired there after spending 30 minutes criticising about them.
But you know, I want whats best for DICE, and I'm just expressing what I see fit as the best for them.
I admit I might probably be wrong about some things and of course
plenty of people are going to disagree with me but that's fine.
We're human after all
and the world wouldn't be as interesting if everyone unanimously agreed on everything.
but I do want to have a conversation with you guys and I will be active
in the comments section so don't be shy to tell me what think and correct me on some of the issues.
And I do want to be corrected.
Now I can't control what you say because this is the internet after all, but at least be civil! That's all I ask.
So if you've watched all the way through this video
and have endured with my speech impediment
and fake accent I thank you so much as as every view counts as a lot to me.
so now as I end this video…. I just want to say
R.I.P. XXXTentacion
XXXTentacion 1998-2018
XXXTinct
You better appreciate dis captions I took the extra time to make it (Thanks For Watching)
Thanks For Watching
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét