-------------------------------------------
grown-ish | Season 2, Episode 4 Promo | Beyoncé Is a Genius - Duration: 0:43.
For more infomation >> grown-ish | Season 2, Episode 4 Promo | Beyoncé Is a Genius - Duration: 0:43. -------------------------------------------
WaPo: White House Prepares For Aggressive Defense Of Executive Privilege | Hardball | MSNBC - Duration: 4:51.
For more infomation >> WaPo: White House Prepares For Aggressive Defense Of Executive Privilege | Hardball | MSNBC - Duration: 4:51. -------------------------------------------
NYT: President Donald Trump Said Border Visit 'Not Going To Change A Damn Thing' | Hardball | MSNBC - Duration: 8:11.
For more infomation >> NYT: President Donald Trump Said Border Visit 'Not Going To Change A Damn Thing' | Hardball | MSNBC - Duration: 8:11. -------------------------------------------
Michael E Dyson: Trump 'Toddler Presidency' An Insult To Toddlers | The Beat With Ari Melber | MSNBC - Duration: 5:33.
For more infomation >> Michael E Dyson: Trump 'Toddler Presidency' An Insult To Toddlers | The Beat With Ari Melber | MSNBC - Duration: 5:33. -------------------------------------------
Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein, Who Oversees Mueller Probe, Expected To Step Down | NBC Nightly News - Duration: 1:41.
For more infomation >> Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein, Who Oversees Mueller Probe, Expected To Step Down | NBC Nightly News - Duration: 1:41. -------------------------------------------
LaMarr Woodley's Epic Camera Story From Super Bowl XLIII | Simms & Lefkoe: The Show Untold Stories - Duration: 1:43.
- I would say in, like, the pantheon of Super Bowls
Steelers-Cardinals was, like, one of the greatest
most exciting games I've ever seen. - Super Bowl 43, yeah.
- You ended that Super Bowl.
So, like, take me through the play, man.
Like, that s--t was nuts.
- You know, it was, like, we had a timeout before
and I remember Coach Tomlin pullin' us out, like
"Woo, we need a big play."
You know, that's the kinda s--t you see on TV, in a movie.
Like, "Come on, man, we need a big play from you."
Like, man, I ain't finna make no big play.
Like, "All right, Coach, you know I got you."
You know, they got Larry Fitzgerald
tallest receiver out there at the time.
Kurt Warner can throw the ball.
- Yeah. - So the best thing to do
is to stop the ball, like in basketball.
Stop the guy with the ball.
So I'm rushin', and Kurt Warner's lookin' at me
so as I went out, he dipped in, so I dipped out
and I seen Kurt reaching back, and I just kinda like—
- Superman. - Supermanned it.
- Yeah.
- Hit the ball out, sack, forced fumble.
Brett Keisel jumped on the ball.
- There's probably two moments
where the crowd goes nuts, right?
One when you smack it out
and then, like, the realization afterwards.
- You know what? It didn't feel real at first.
Going into that game, we felt like we was gonna win anyways
so I already had my camera on the sideline.
- What do you mean, you brought a camera down?
- After halftime, I snuck it on the field.
- You snuck it on your jersey? - I snuck it on the field.
- So were you doing, like, selfies?
- Hell yeah. I was recording myself.
And I remember Brett Keisel asking me, said
"LaMarr, man, you want the football?"
I said, "Nah, man, keep it." Why in the hell did I say that?
- Yeah, what were you thinking?
- He caught me at an exciting time.
- Bein' a good teammate. - Yeah.
And to this day, I'm still tryin'
to get that damn ball back.
If I ever go to his house, I'm takin' the ball.
- You gonna steal it? - Yeah, I'm gonna steal it.
- Brett, Brett, hide the ball, man.
- I'm stealin' that, for real. - [Laughing]
- When the Eagles beat the Bears, I was so excited
-------------------------------------------
R. Kelly Could Face New Investigations As Accusers Urged To Come Forward | NBC Nightly News - Duration: 1:34.
For more infomation >> R. Kelly Could Face New Investigations As Accusers Urged To Come Forward | NBC Nightly News - Duration: 1:34. -------------------------------------------
Second dead man found in Democratic donor's home - Duration: 5:16.
For more infomation >> Second dead man found in Democratic donor's home - Duration: 5:16. -------------------------------------------
Millions Of Americans Continuing To Not Get Paid Amid Government Shutdown | NBC Nightly News - Duration: 1:37.
For more infomation >> Millions Of Americans Continuing To Not Get Paid Amid Government Shutdown | NBC Nightly News - Duration: 1:37. -------------------------------------------
With the government shutdown, American scientific progress is disrupted - Duration: 3:43.
JUDY WOODRUFF: And one more take on the impact of this shutdown, this time on science.
William Brangham explores the ways research is feeling the heat.
WILLIAM BRANGHAM: There are thousands of researchers who are furloughed or working without pay
at agencies like the EPA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the U.S. Department
of Agriculture, and the U.S. Geological Survey.
And there are many others who don't work directly for the government, but who are also still
feeling the pinch, people like the men and women at various universities who get federal
money for their research.
With the shutdown, the pipeline for that money is now blocked.
With all these scientists idled, many argue that some very important work, things like
the regular monitoring of chemicals, to tracking of endangered species, is also not happening.
Rush Holt is the CEO of the American Association for the Advancement of Science.
He's also a former congressman from New Jersey.
And he joins me now.
Welcome to the "NewsHour."
RUSH HOLT, CEO, American Association for the Advancement of Science: Good to be with you,
William.
Thank you.
WILLIAM BRANGHAM: Can you give us a sense just of the scope and scale of the kinds of
science that have been idled by the shutdown?
RUSH HOLT: Sure.
It's thousands and thousands of scientists who are missing their weekly paycheck, but
they are also running into delays, disruptions, sometimes ruination of their research projects.
WILLIAM BRANGHAM: Ruination?
RUSH HOLT: Well, suppose you have a timed series, and you have to get a sample every
week, every month for it to work.
Suppose you're doing field study and you're looking at stream creatures when the stream
is at a certain level in January.
Suppose you are preparing a space mission, a satellite science mission.
You have got a certain launch window.
WILLIAM BRANGHAM: I hadn't even thought about those kinds of impacts.
RUSH HOLT: Suppose you're looking at insects, and you have to look during the week in the
year when they mate.
You know, if the government is closed that week, and you can't collect the data, that's
a problem.
WILLIAM BRANGHAM: Such a remarkable array of work that we don't really think of as necessarily
being government-funded work.
I mentioned some of the agencies at the top.
Are there other federal agencies or even those that are doing particular work that you know
of that has come to a stop?
RUSH HOLT: The National Science Foundation, of course, is all fields of science.
The Census Bureau.
WILLIAM BRANGHAM: The Census Bureau?
(CROSSTALK)
RUSH HOLT: Out of the Department of Commerce.
They -- there are many social scientists either that use those data or are employed to analyze
those data.
The weather forecasters are kept on the job.
But the people who tweet the weather models are not.
And, as we see snowstorms predicted in the East here, we will see whether these weather
forecasters are as accurate as they might normally be.
WILLIAM BRANGHAM: Do you think that, when we look back a year or two, three years from
now, that there will be a demonstrable impact on the scientific community and scientific
research in the U.S.?
RUSH HOLT: It's going to be hard to measure, but I don't doubt it.
It's very interconnected.
But at a time when we are concerned in international comparisons about how the U.S. science effort
stacks up, this is not a good time to slow down.
The Chinese just landed on the dark side of the moon.
And we have researchers who think that they should be doing work to help national security
and human welfare and safety and public health, the very things that are at stake here.
They're waiting at home for the phone call to go back to work.
WILLIAM BRANGHAM: Rush Holt of the American Association for the Advancement of Science,
thank you very much.
RUSH HOLT: Thank you.
-------------------------------------------
Yoon hee "He looks so young & cute back then!" [Happy Together/2018.12.27] - Duration: 7:00.
Next up is Yoonhee,
who is joining as a new host of Happy Together.
Let's take a look at her embarrassing moment.
- Do you have one? / - Do you?
- You probably don't. / - I think
it's when I was on this show with Donggun.
- Why? / - Back then,
I didn't realize we'd end up together.
I said that he was boring and a bit ill-mannered.
I felt sorry when we started dating.
(Two years ago, they were just colleagues.)
- His humor. / - What of it?
I don't find his jokes funny at all.
He's never made me burst out in laughter.
Anyway, I find it embarrassing now.
I hear you watched it after getting married.
We watched a rerun of it.
- Really? / - It was embarrassing.
I remember what I thought that day.
I wondered how they'd pull off being a couple
when they didn't have the chemistry.
Yoonhee kept complaining about him
and Donggun only had eyes for Cha Inpyo.
The chemistry was troubling.
Donggun, how did you feel?
I found it funny.
- Was it all right? / - Yes.
That's all there is to it, then.
(Donggun's fine with it.)
We won't erase it, then.
Donggun, what about you?
I thought long and hard about this.
(Does he have something he wishes to erase?)
I have too many.
I doubt it.
- The fact that I debuted as a singer first... / - Yes,
we all know that.
Not many know it.
(He debuted as a handsome balladeer.)
Anyway, I released a dance song in my first album
even though I was a balladeer.
I remember.
Back then, that was the standard.
- Many did dance music. / - As a promotion.
Lee Jeehoon, who debuted before me, did it.
Yes, he did.
The same went for Lee Kichan.
Although they debuted as balladeers,
they also released a dance number.
I did that as well,
and it's one of my first embarrassing moments.
In order to erase it, we must watch it.
- We must take a look. / - Yes.
I didn't know we would do that.
(Lee Donggun)
When did you release this song?
("Propose" by Lee Donggun)
"Propose".
(Lee Donggun)
(Young)
- He looks cool. / - He looks nice.
- He still looks nice. / - He is the same.
(He has the same hairstyle.)
He looks cool.
- How do I look? / - The dance is outdated.
- You look cute. / - He still looks cool.
You look the same.
- Nothing has changed. / - You have the same hairstyle.
- He didn't get old. / - Seriously.
It's like you didn't age.
He brought this video clip to brag.
(He brought this video clip to brag.)
Have you seen this, Yoonhee?
- This is my first time. / - Really?
- How long has it been? / - 20 years.
- It has been 20 years. / - It's unbelievable.
It has been 20 years. That was 1989.
20 years?
(His looks are unchanging.)
He has unchanging looks.
We think he looks cool in the video clip.
Yoonhee, what did you think?
He looks really cute.
- Right? / - Yes.
I will take this video clip with me.
(Yoonhee will save it in her hard drive.)
Take it.
There is no need to cast a spell.
Eunwoo, how was that?
It made Donggun look cooler.
I know.
- Is he making fun of me? / - No, he isn't!
Release the song again.
- Release the song again. / - It's a good idea.
- You are a good singer. / - That's right.
He looks a bit cold now,
but he looks so young and cute back then.
- He's so cute. / - It's not a bad memory.
- Seriously. / - We will skip this.
- Yoonhee wants it. / - Give me the video clip.
- Forget about it. / - We will give it to you.
In a way, Donggun and Eunwoo
are taking a similar path.
Eunwoo is the face of the 21st century
and Donggun was the face of the 20th century.
You saw the video clip.
- He is very handsome. / - Yes.
(He can sing and act.)
Both of them are singers-turned-actors.
- They sing and act. / - That's right.
Some things have changed, but any advice for him?
I think we have many things in common.
- You agree. / - Yes.
(He agrees without giving advice.)
Give him some advice.
- Advice? / - Yes.
I'm in no position to do that.
- Why would you say that? / - I saw him
when he was a singer,
and I thought that he would do well as an actor.
Soon after that, he became a leading actor
and the drama received a lot of love.
"I knew it."
I had that thought.
You don't have any advice since he is doing well.
He is doing very well.
(He is a kind and handsome senior actor.)
- Thank you. / - All right.
- Wonyoung, do you have a bad memory? / - Do you?
A director once called me and
requested that I make a cameo appearance
- in a drama. / - We love these stories.
It was out of the blue.
A rich man who mistreats a salesman,
a passer-by who yells,
and a beggar were my options.
He asked me to play one of those roles.
So out of those options, I chose the beggar.
There are senior actors who have played beggars.
This became a meme.
Son Hyunjoo has played a beggar.
- I know this one. / - Park Shinyang too.
- It's from a drama. / - I know this one.
Hyunjoo is a senior actor whom I highly respect.
- He is famous. / - Yes.
I called him.
"I am going to play a beggar."
"Please give me your know-how and tips."
He confidently said,
"Wonyoung, burn 10 newspapers."
"Newspapers?"
- "Don't use makeup." / - "Use soot."
"Burn 10 newspapers,"
- "take the soot" / - That's real advice.
"and mix it with water."
"Once that's done, put the mixture on your face"
- "to look dirty." / - That makes it look real.
It was a good tip.
I went to the set and applied it on my face.
I got dressed up
and talked with the makeup artist for the details.
I had a black plastic bag.
(A black plastic bag)
I wore wool shoes with a hole.
I blackened my teeth.
Then I had the shoot.
My intention was...
I approached the shoot
with the mindset of taking it
as a meaningful experience.
I got advice from a senior actor who'd played a beggar,
but Hyunjoo was a beggar who is aware.
- Really? / - In the drama,
he was a smart beggar who reads the Bible.
Shinyang was a beggar
- with a past. / - That's right.
Mine was simply a beggar who stole shoes.
It wasn't very meaningful.
Compared to the efforts I made,
the result seemed a bit lacking.
It didn't even become the talk of the town
- before it was forgotten. / - It felt futile.
- The effort was in vain. / - I wanted a backstory.
Shall we take a look?
-------------------------------------------
Tucker: Democrat talking points echo across the land - Duration: 5:54.
For more infomation >> Tucker: Democrat talking points echo across the land - Duration: 5:54. -------------------------------------------
PBS NewsHour full episode Jan. 9, 2019 - Duration: 54:01.
JUDY WOODRUFF: Good evening.
I'm Judy Woodruff.
On the "NewsHour" tonight: a shutdown stalemate.
President Trump walks out of a meeting with congressional leaders at the White House,
tweeting the negotiations were a total waste of time.
Then: how the shutdown is impacting immigration courts.
Judges are working without pay and many migrants are seeing their cases delayed, sometimes
for years.
Plus: Virtual reality allows doctors to take patients and families on an immersive tour
of the brain prior to surgery.
DR.
KURTIS AUGUSTE, UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital: I tell people all the time, as I'm preparing
for surgery scrolling through MRIs, if only I could shrink myself down to this small,
and insert myself into this space, and just take a look around.
And that's effectively what you can do with this technology.
JUDY WOODRUFF: All that and more on tonight's "PBS NewsHour."
(BREAK)
JUDY WOODRUFF: A wipeout at the White House.
The latest meeting between President Trump and congressional leaders has ended abruptly,
in a new round of recriminations.
That leaves much of the United States government still shut down over the issue of a border
wall.
Congressional correspondent Lisa Desjardins reports.
LISA DESJARDINS: It was the shortest shutdown meeting yet.
REP.
NANCY PELOSI (D-CA), Speaker of the House: Federal workers will not be receiving their
paychecks.
LISA DESJARDINS: This afternoon, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck
Schumer were in the White House for about 30 minutes, when Schumer said the president
ended their meeting, refusing to reopen government.
SEN.
CHUCK SCHUMER (D-NY), Minority Leader: Well, unfortunately, the president just got up and
walked out.
He asked Speaker Pelosi, "Will you agree to my wall?"
She said no.
And he just got up and said, "Then we have nothing to discuss," and he just walked out.
LISA DESJARDINS: As Democrats spoke, President Trump tweeted confirmation that he ended today's
talks.
MIKE PENCE, Vice President of the United States: We just ended a very short meeting in the
Situation Room.
LISA DESJARDINS: Republicans, led by Vice President Pence, pointed to Democrats as the
problem, saying Democrats made it clear they will not move closer to the president's position
on the wall.
MIKE PENCE: Today, in this brief meeting, we heard once again that Democratic leaders
are unwilling to even negotiate to resolve this partial government shutdown or address
the crisis at our southern border.
LISA DESJARDINS: This was the capstone to a day where the two sides moved farther apart.
MAN: top playing chicken with our lives.
LISA DESJARDINS: Democrats started the morning flanked by furloughed federal workers.
SEN.
CHUCK SCHUMER: The first order of business, open up the government.
You heard these people.
Right?
MAN: Yes.
WOMAN: Exactly.
MAN: Open it up.
LISA DESJARDINS: Among them, Holly Salamido, who had worked at Housing and Urban development
and now heads a local union chapter.
She said it's not just workers, but those in federal housing who are at risk.
HOLLY SALAMIDO, President, AFGE Council 222.
If there's a problem, there's no one at HUD to call.
In some cases, people are facing eviction.
LISA DESJARDINS: This as President Trump spent the day underscoring his Oval Office address
last night about border security and his demand for a southern border barrier.
At a bill signing, he said wall.
DONALD TRUMP, President of the United States: We can all play games, but a wall is a necessity.
All of the other things, the sensors and the drones, it's all wonderful to have, and it
works well, but only if you have the wall.
If you don't have the wall, it doesn't matter.
LISA DESJARDINS: The president did take time to address divisions in his own party.
The president and vice president lunched with Republican senators.
Sources say the president privately called for unity.
Publicly, he was confident and praised GOP Leader Mitch McConnell.
DONALD TRUMP: I would say we have a very, very united party.
Mitch has been fantastic.
Everybody in that room was fantastic.
LISA DESJARDINS: Still, several Republican senators are signaling otherwise.
Alaska's Lisa Murkowski, Colorado's Cory Gardner, and Maine's Susan Collins have signaled they
are ready to act on bills passed by House Democrats to reopen most government.
That legislation funds most agencies for the rest of the year, and funds DHS for one month,
giving time for more border security talks.
But Republican Leader Mitch McConnell says no deal will get a vote until the president
and all sides support it.
SEN.
MITCH MCCONNELL (R-KY), Majority Leader: We're all behind the president.
We think the border security issue is extremely important to the country.
LISA DESJARDINS: Another sign that leaders are moving farther from any middle ground,
today, Vice President Pence seemed to reach out to the conservative base, speaking to
talk radio host Rush Limbaugh with uncompromising tone.
MIKE PENCE: President Trump and I and our entire team is determined to stand firm until
the Democrats in Congress come to the table and work with us to secure the border, build
a wall, end this humanitarian crisis, and do what's right for the American people.
LISA DESJARDINS: Tomorrow, leaders again go in different directions.
House Democrats plan to pass separate bills, reopening most agencies, and the president
plans to visit the Texas border to reinforce his case for a wall.
JUDY WOODRUFF: And Lisa joins me now from Capitol Hill, along with Yamiche Alcindor
from the White House.
Yamiche, that was quite a meeting, by all accounts.
Tell us, what is the president saying about it?
And, I guess, afterwards, the vice president came out with other Republicans and talked
to you and other reporters.
YAMICHE ALCINDOR: Well, negotiations essentially spun out of control and hit a roadblock.
This was quite a scene on the White House lawn today.
The Democrats were saying that the president threw a temper tantrum, and Republicans are
saying that the Democrats were not telling the truth.
Now, the president, a few minutes after this meeting that was supposed to be longer, but
ended about 30 minutes, tweeted.
And I want to read to you what he tweeted.
He tweeted: "Just left a meeting with Chuck and Nancy, a total waste of time.
I asked, what is going to happen in 30 days if I quickly open things up?
Are you going to approve border security, which includes a wall or steel barrier?
Nancy said no.
I said bye-bye.
Nothing else works."
Now, Senator Schumer said that the president then slammed his hands on the table while
he was in the meeting.
And I then talked to Vice President Pence about that and said, what was the mood in
that meeting and are we closer to a national emergency?
Vice President Pence told me that the president -- quote -- "The president walked into the
room and passed out candy.
I don't recall him ever raising his voice or slamming his hands."
So what we have is two completely different stories about how this meeting went.
What is clear, though, is that things are going to be prolonged.
This shutdown is not ending anytime soon.
And Democrats and Republicans are really going back to their corners.
JUDY WOODRUFF: So, Lisa, to you now.
What are Republican -- what are people saying on the Hill about this, about what -- the
breakdown of these talks yet again, and how long do they think this can go on?
LISA DESJARDINS: Well, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi returned to the Hill, and she told
reporters that the president was being petulant, in her words.
And she repeated some of what she said at the White House.
I spoke to Republican House members on their way to a vote.
And it was fascinating, Judy.
Several of them just shrugged.
One of them literally shrugged and said, that's how things are right now.
It's broken down to this point.
However, I will also say, from those Republican House members, they seem to be coalescing
more around the president than I have seen before.
The president seems to have convinced at least House Republicans that he is very serious
about pushing for his wall.
In the words of these House Republicans, they now think Democrats need to bring an offer
to the table.
That's something I didn't hear from these House members last week, and they're saying
it more and more.
However, Democrats are saying something else, Judy.
They're saying the president is not someone who can be negotiated with right now, and
that he is being unreasonable and unruly.
And here's the interesting part, Judy.
Democrats are saying they think the pressure needs to be on Mitch McConnell, that they
think Senate Republicans are the place where there could be a breakthrough in these negotiations,
and they want to add pressure on those Senate Republicans.
We will see if that happens.
JUDY WOODRUFF: Pointing fingers in the opposite direction, both sides are.
Yamiche, we know that there are polls showing that a bare majority, but a majority of Americans
blame the president for the shutdown.
What do we know about how he's trying to change public opinion?
YAMICHE ALCINDOR: Well, the president is changing public -- or trying to change public opinion
by meeting with lawmakers in person, by going on TV and sending other representatives for
the White House on TV, and by going on conservative talk radio.
The president today held a meeting with congressional Senate Republicans.
And in that meeting, he repeatedly said, we need to have unity, we need to be strong,
this is the probably the best time we're going to have to get funding for the wall, so stick
with me.
The other thing that's important is that Vice President Pence went on Rush Limbaugh's conservative
radio show today.
Now, Vice President Pence just on Monday said that he hates the word base and that he -- this
is not about politics.
But then, today, he went on Rush Limbaugh's show and said, thank you for all that you're
doing for us and thank you for building this movement.
Add to that the fact that the president is going to be heading to the border tomorrow.
He's going to be making his case, talking to people in Texas, talking to them about
what he sees as a crisis on the border.
So what we're seeing is a White House that's using its messaging power both all over as
much as they possibly can to make the case that this is a crisis and that Democrats are
in the wrong here.
JUDY WOODRUFF: And, Lisa, very quickly, political dynamics on the Hill?
How do these members of Congress seem?
It appears they're getting farther apart.
LISA DESJARDINS: There is a real split here, Judy.
And, again, it's a little bit House and Senate.
I spoke to a very plugged-in House Republican.
And he told me, listen, most House Republicans do not have federal workers in their district.
So, he point-blank said, it's not in our interest to end the shutdown.
I countered and said, yes, but there are some interesting groups like, say, Customs and
Border Patrol officers who will not be paid.
That's pretty -- generally a demographic that Republicans think about a lot.
He said, yes, that's true.
Once we see law enforcement suffering, that might move the dial for Republicans.
But, otherwise, the federal worker argument is not something we care about.
We care much more about border security and we think it's a serious threat.
Democrats, on the other hand, think this is all a very large political mistake for Republicans.
They say walking out of a meeting is something that will cost them politically for months,
perhaps years.
We will see.
JUDY WOODRUFF: Another day, apparently no closer and apparently even farther apart,
the two sides are.
Lisa Desjardins, Yamiche Alcindor, thank you both.
YAMICHE ALCINDOR: Thanks.
JUDY WOODRUFF: And we will look at the effects of the shutdown and where to go from here
after the news summary.
In the day's other news: There's word that Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein will
leave the Justice Department once a new attorney general is confirmed.
Rosenstein oversees special counsel Robert Mueller's Russia investigation, and has often
been attacked by President Trump.
William Barr would assume that oversight role, if he becomes attorney general.
He met with Republican senators today, including Lindsey Graham of South Carolina.
SEN.
LINDSEY GRAHAM (R), South Carolina: I asked Mr. Barr directly, do you think Bob -- Mr.
Mueller is on a witch-hunt?
He said no.
Do you see any reason for Mr. Mueller's investigation to be stopped.
He said no.
Do you see any basis for a termination based on cause?
He said no.
Are you committed to making sure Mr. Mueller can finish his job?
Yes.
JUDY WOODRUFF: In the past, Barr criticized the Russia investigation, but, today, he said
Mueller is doing an excellent job.
The Israeli security service Shin Bet vowed today to block foreign interference in Israel's
upcoming elections.
The agency's chief had warned that a foreign power is trying to meddle in the campaign.
Suspicion quickly fell on Russia, but the Kremlin denied any involvement.
Iran has confirmed the arrest of a U.S. Navy veteran, but is not saying what he is charged
with.
Michael White is the first American known to be detained there since President Trump
took office.
He disappeared while visiting Iran last July.
News of the arrest comes as the U.S. is ratcheting up economic sanctions on Tehran.
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo was in Iraq today, offering reassurance about the fate
of Kurdish fighters in Syria.
They have fought the Islamic State group, but Turkey regards the Kurds as terrorists,
and it's threatening to attack them once the U.S. withdraws from Syria.
Pompeo held meetings in Baghdad and with Iraqi Kurds in Irbil.
He insisted the Syrian Kurds are not being abandoned.
MIKE POMPEO, U.S. Secretary of State: These have been folks that have fought with us,
and it is important that we do everything we can to ensure that those folks that have
fought with us are protected.
JUDY WOODRUFF: From Iraq, Pompeo moved on to Egypt.
He will travel to Saudi Arabia and to other Gulf states later.
The president of Sudan has rejected demands for his resignation, despite three weeks of
protests.
Omar al-Bashir insisted today that he will leave only if he's voted out.
He took power in a military coup in 1989.
As al-Bashir spoke, hundreds of anti-government demonstrators marched in the city of Omdurman.
They headed for Parliament, before police intervened.
In Bangladesh, thousands of garment workers took to the streets for a fourth day, demanding
better pay.
Protesters shut down factories and blocked roads on the outskirts of the capital, Dhaka.
That set off clashes with riot police, who used water cannons and batons to disperse
the crowds.
Local reports said that one demonstrator was shot dead.
In the Philippines, a colossal crowd of Catholic faithful joined in a daylong procession for
the Black Nazarene, a centuries-old statue of Jesus Christ.
Up to five million people marched through Manila alongside the carriage holding the
statue.
Many said they believe it has healing powers.
VALENTINA RAMOS, Procession Attendee (through translator): First, my daughter had cancer,
and she survived, she survived cancer twice.
Then my husband got a lung disease, and he also survived.
Then my firstborn was able to get a good job, because of the Black Nazarene.
JUDY WOODRUFF: Spanish missionaries are said to have brought the statue to Manila in the
1600s.
It was burned black during a fire on the ship that carried it.
Back in this country, President Trump has formally nominated Andrew Wheeler to run the
Environmental Protection Agency.
The former energy lobbyist has been serving as acting EPA chief since July.
Wheeler's predecessor, Scott Pruitt, resigned last summer amid scrutiny of his spending
and various ethical issues.
Toyota is recalling another 1.3 million vehicles in the U.S. over faulty air bag inflators.
They're blamed for at least 23 deaths around the world.
Some 50 million air bag inflators made by Takata have been recalled in recent years.
One-third of them have yet to be replaced.
And on Wall Street, the Dow Jones industrial average gained 91 points to close at 23879.
The Nasdaq rose 60, and the S&P 500 added 10.
Still to come on the "NewsHour": what will it take to find a deal to open the government;
why the shutdown is adding to already overwhelmed immigration courts; virtual reality gives
patients and doctors an inside look at the brain; plus, how one writer's decision to
speak about her rape inspired a new book.
The breakdown of talks at the White House today demonstrates the deep divides on both
policy and politics.
We want to get two takes now on where things could go after this latest stalemate.
We begin with a man who has served in many key roles in Washington, Leon Panetta.
He served as defense secretary under President Obama.
He was also chief of staff for President Clinton during the longest government shutdown to
date.
Leon Panetta, welcome back to the "NewsHour."
So, today saw yet another breakdown in a meeting between the president and Democratic leaders.
As somebody who's overseen and lived through a shutdown in the past, how do you see what's
going on now?
LEON PANETTA, Former U.S. Secretary of Defense: Well, Judy, I think -- I think we all have
to begin with a basic premise here, which is that there is no justifiable reason, whether
it's a wall or whether it's a war, to justify shutting the government down.
The government needs to continue to function.
The American people are entitled to the services that are provided, and we shouldn't use federal
employees as pawns in this kind of political conflict.
I think, ultimately, there's only one way to get out of this mess, which is to reopen
the government, open it on a short-term basis, if necessary, and then sit down and negotiate
on some kind of comprehensive approach to border security.
That's the only sane way to try to get out of this mess.
JUDY WOODRUFF: But, right now, President Trump is saying he won't do that.
Should the Democrats give in some way in order to get the president to agree to open the
government and then talk about the border?
LEON PANETTA: I think the most important -- important issue right now is not to keep the government
shut down.
There's no reason for that.
People are not getting paychecks.
Their families are hurting.
We are punishing innocent people in this process.
There's no excuse for that.
So reopen the government, and then I think the Democrats ought to commit themselves to
sitting down and negotiating on border security.
There are a lot of areas on border security where there's agreement, the need for technology,
the need for personnel, the need for judges, the need for humanitarian assistance.
As far as a wall is concerned, Republicans and Democrats in the past have agreed on physical
barriers to be used in key areas along the border.
I think there are ways to resolve this, but the president is going to have to say that
he is willing to negotiate without necessarily getting the money he wants for a wall.
And I think he's put himself in a very difficult position, where it's the wall or nothing.
JUDY WOODRUFF: So when Speaker Pelosi, in response to the president reportedly in that
meeting at the White House today, when the president asked her, if I agree to open the
government, we talk about this in a month about what to do about border security, the
border wall, would you be willing to do that, and she said no, was that the right answer?
LEON PANETTA: Well, my understanding from those that were present was he asked, if I
open up the government in 30 days, would you be willing to agree on a wall, and she said
no.
She's always made her position pretty clear with regards to a wall, as have the Democrats
and has -- and, frankly, there are Republicans opposed to a wall approach.
If the president could sell a wall, he would have done it the last two years with a Republican
majority in both the House and the Senate.
He's been unable to do that.
So the issue is going to come down to, do we want real border security to deal with
the crisis along the border?
There are ways to do this, ways both sides can agree to.
But the issue of a wall, if it's about a concrete wall on the border, I think that basically
shuts down any possibility of negotiation.
JUDY WOODRUFF: Well, I guess the president is now talking about a steel -- a wall made
out of steel.
But, Leon Panetta, how do you -- right now, you have got both sides saying, I'm not budging
anymore, this is it.
What happened -- how long can this go on?
LEON PANETTA: Well, having gone through this when I was chief of staff to Bill Clinton,
we went through a lot of negotiations.
We were not able to arrive at any consensus.
The government shut down.
And, ultimately, what happened is that the political impact of that shutdown and the
people that were affected began to really hurt the Republican leadership in the Congress.
And I think the same thing's going to happen here.
You cannot have people losing their paychecks, you cannot have people hurting with their
families, you cannot have people going without food, not able to get loans, you cannot allow
that to continue to happen, and not have a political impact from that taking place.
When that happens, then the president and the Republicans and the Democrats as well
will agree that it's time to open up the government, and then get back to the business of the country.
JUDY WOODRUFF: Well, that's exactly what I want to ask you about, because, right now,
the polls are showing Republicans are overwhelmingly with the president on this.
I saw 77 percent of Republicans -- I was just looking at a poll -- want additional border
fencing.
The president is listening to his base, listening to Republicans.
LEON PANETTA: I think there's no question that he has support along with his base, but
the question is, what is it we need in order to ensure good border security?
That is the fundamental question.
We all agree on the crisis.
So what are the steps needed in order to get border security?
And, yes, we agree on technology, we agree on personnel, we agree on judges, we agree
on other steps that need to be taken.
With regards to a wall, I think those who are experts with regards to security have
said, yes, we can use some physical barriers, yes, we can use some fencing.
I think there should be some agreement along those lines.
JUDY WOODRUFF: Right.
LEON PANETTA: But, as to a wall, I just don't think that there's going to be any support
for that.
JUDY WOODRUFF: Very quickly, Leon Panetta, if you were here today in Washington, what
would you do if you were at the White House as chief of staff or on Capitol Hill?
LEON PANETTA: You know, I understand the politics.
Everybody's painted themselves into a corner.
But I think it's the responsibility of the president of the United States to protect
this country, and it isn't just about the security along the border.
It's about the operations of government on behalf of the people of this country.
The purpose of government is not to punish our people.
It is to help our people, and that's why he should take steps to open up the government
and then get a commitment from the Democrats to negotiate on border security.
That's the best way out of this mess.
JUDY WOODRUFF: Former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, we thank you.
And for a Republican's take, we turn now to a member of their House leadership team, Representative
Doug Collins of Georgia.
Congressman Collins, welcome back to the "NewsHour."
I think you just heard Leon Panetta say, the president -- it's one thing to be worried
about the border, but what the president needs to be more concerned about is the country
overall, the American people overall and the welfare of this country.
SEN.
DOUG COLLINS (R), Georgia: Judy, I think he's exactly right, but I think he's exactly right
for a reason he doesn't believe.
I believe what is happening right now at the border is that the Democrats are putting the
lives of others who are coming to our country, trying to come in illegally, ahead of the
rights of Americans who are here.
I believe the president is putting Americans first.
I believe he is putting our citizenry first.
And we do need to have a balanced approach.
No one on the Hill, myself and many others, including the president, have said the border
wall or security measures are the only thing that we need.
There are humanitarian assistance.
There's issues of health and safety.
There are issues in our laws right now that are giving, frankly, a perverse incentive
for people to come across the border to make those long, dangerous trips up here.
But I think he does have it right in one respect.
The president is looking out for the American people.
And, oftentimes, when the Democrats will not come to the table, they're telling the American
people, we prefer to be on the side of those trying to break in illegally to the country
and now the American citizen.
JUDY WOODRUFF: Well, I don't think -- Democrats certainly wouldn't agree with that.
But, Congressman Collins, let me ask you about what you just said about the president's emphasis.
He -- in every conversation, he's bringing up a wall, a physical border.
You just described a number of other things that it appears the parties could come to
some sort of agreement on.
Why does the wall itself have to be resolved before federal workers are relieved of what's
going on right now, this situation where they're not getting paid and enduring hardships?
REP.
DOUG COLLINS: Well, at this point in time, I think the president has made it clear.
And I think the reason the wall is because it's not been addressed.
Now, it's been interesting that Democrats addressed it in the past.
And they addressed it in building a lot more wall and addressed it in funding it and even
going back many years and saying, we want border security.
The question is, I agree, border security has got to take place, because what has happened
so many times in the past is, we say we're going to secure the border.
We say we're either going to put fencing up or do the next technologies -- technologies
and things that we need to do.
But yet, at the end of the time, we end up not doing those things.
And we take -- and we -- in the past, we gave amnesty away.
We gave pathways for people to stay.
And we have not addressed that.
There has to be a twofold approach here, Judy.
There has to be a security piece and the piece that we actually look at to fix it.
JUDY WOODRUFF: But, in the meantime, as we just, again, heard from Leon Panetta, and
we have heard it from others, the Americans -- those who work for the federal government
are being punished because of this unwillingness to bend at the highest levels of our -- the
leadership of our country.
REP.
DOUG COLLINS: Well, at this point in time, Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi, I agree with
the discussion, that we need to have, that this is not where we need to be.
But this is not simply a presidential problem.
The president said we need border security and we need the wall.
He's made that clear.
But also, at the same point, when there's not even a discussion, when he said, if I
open it up today, would we have discussion on a wall or border security in 30 days?
Nancy Pelosi said no.
She's made it very clear that her choice is those trying to come in illegally, not the
American people that she claims to be -- the workers she claims to be fighting for.
But yet her priorities are still on a border situation in which, if you ask specifically
what are you wanting to do to fix some of these issues, we're not getting that.
She just simply says, we're not going to work on it.
But yet, in the past, a Democrat such as Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and, yes, even Chuck
Schumer have voted for border security walls.
They just use it now as a political toy, not to deal with security.
JUDY WOODRUFF: It's my understanding that the Democratic leadership is saying, we will
talk about security.
It's the wall that's the issue.
But let me turn to something else.
The majority in the House, which is now Democrats, have started tonight, today to pass bills
to open up individual departments and agencies of government, the IRS, the Treasury, and
others.And eight Republicans have now so far voted with the Democrats.
Are you concerned there are cracks in the Republican support for your side of this argument?
REP.
DOUG COLLINS: No.
If you look back over our voting history, Judy, if you look at almost any votes, when
even we were in the majority, we would have -- we would typically have five to six or
seven Republicans vote no.
We just are not always lockstep.
That is not a significant number.
The vast majority, overwhelming majority of Republicans are focused on a plan to say,
we will deal with this as a package, because what the Democrats want to do is take away
the incentive to get this thing solved.
And if all you're focusing on is opening the government, making it painless, then they
can keep kicking the can of border security down the line.
We're standing with the president on this.
We want to see a deal.
We want to work it out, but -- and even Democrats that I talked to on the Florida are wanting
to find -- and the question that came from many of them to me was, how can we get out
of this?
They understand that it is both not just a single issue.
And we have got to work on that.
JUDY WOODRUFF: Just finally, Congressman Collins, the statistics and numbers the president continues
to cite, it's clear that some of those are just either flat-out wrong or greatly exaggerated,
for example, talking about the spike in illegal drugs coming across the border.
Those are -- apparently, most or all of them are coming through legal ports of entry, something
a wall wouldn't address.
Talking about the security crisis at the border, so much of this has to do with people seeking
asylum, seeking legal asylum, but the U.S. not having the capacity to deal with that,
again, not something a wall could address.
So how do you get at the core, just flat-out disagreement over what's true here?
REP.
DOUG COLLINS: Well, what is true is, we have over 300,000 people coming across that are
detained at our border.
I don't think anybody would argue that's not a large number.
What is true is that 50 people a day are being referred to medical care coming across the
border.
They're coming across sick.
They're coming across because they're willing to take lives into their hands to do this.
And, really, it's because of really three areas.
There is the Flores.
Three areas we could fix on this, Judy.
I think the Flores decision, which encourages families to come across, and the decision
says that we can -- only can detain them for 20 days while we determine their status.
What happens is, they're let go.
They go out into the country.
And their decision is decided many years later.
We could also look at asylum issues, credible fear claims.
When they do get to that border and they want to claim asylum, 90 percent are admitted on
credible fear.
But after it's adjudicated, less than 20 percent are actually allowed to stay, because the
fear standard doesn't make.
(CROSSTALK)
JUDY WOODRUFF: But my point is, very quickly, that wouldn't be resolved by a wall.
REP.
DOUG COLLINS: Walls -- but -- but, also Judy, not dealing with a wall, not dealing with
border security, and only trying to deal with other issues, you have got to take away the
incentive and also take away the barrier.
Border Patrol agents have actually said, in the areas in which we have talked about, border
walls actually work.
And to deny that that happened is not true.
But also to say that is the only issue is also not being a complete picture person.
I want to be a complete picture person.
So we need the wall.
We need security.
And we need to fix these perverse incentives that will send parents, will take children,
separate themselves, and send them on journeys without them, into the dangers that are presented
there.
We have got to look at this as a whole.
JUDY WOODRUFF: Congressman Doug Collins from the House leadership, Republican leadership,
thank you very much.
REP.
DOUG COLLINS: Judy, it's good to see you.
JUDY WOODRUFF: As this partial shutdown grinds on tonight, we get two more looks at its ripple
effects.
By all accounts, the nation's immigration courts are overburdened, approximately 800,000
cases being handled by around 400 immigration judges.
Now, because of the shutdown, most of those cases are on hold.
Amna Nawaz takes it from there.
AMNA NAWAZ: In every case before them, immigration judges are the arbiter, deciding if immigrants
who appear in their court have legal permission to stay in the U.S., or if they may have to
be deported.
For a closer look at what the shutdown means for the immigration court system, I'm joined
by Judge Dana Leigh Marks.
She's a spokeswoman and president emeritus of the National Association of Immigration
Judges.
Judge Marks, thanks for joining me.
Let's begin with the shutdown.
Who's working, who's not, and what's been the effect of cases that are already in the
pipeline?
JUDGE DANA LEIGH MARKS, President Emeritus, National Association of Immigration Judges:
It's been a devastating impact to have our immigration courts shut down, Amna.
You're well aware of the tremendous backlog.
And the only judges who are working are those who are hearing cases of individuals who are
held in custody by the immigration officials.
All of the non-detained cases in courts, which are the vast majority of our dockets, are
on hold for the indefinite future.
AMNA NAWAZ: And so we know some of these cases can already take years to unfold.
What does it mean for the future of those cases?
JUDGE DANA LEIGH MARKS: It's very difficult to make that assessment.
I know, for me in San Francisco, for example, I have a pending caseload of over 4,000 cases.
So many of the cases that are being canceled for the shutdown have been on my docket already
for two or three or four years, and now I have no time in the foreseeable future to
reset them.
It could be another three or four years before those people can expect hearings on their
cases.
AMNA NAWAZ: So we heard about that backlog.
That is now at a record high.
And if you take a look at those numbers, those have been going up rapidly over the last 10
years.
I guess the basic question is, how did we get here?
JUDGE DANA LEIGH MARKS: Well, it has been a long time in coming through both Democratic
and Republican administrations.
While there has been a big focus on immigration enforcement, there has not been sufficient
focus to the immigration court system.
We're housed in the Department of Justice, and, frankly, the Department of Justice has
not advocated either as forcefully or skillfully for us.
As the Department of Homeland Security's enforcement resources has grown, what's happened for the
courts is that we have fallen behind and not received proportional increases that we would
need to stay current with the cases that come into our system.
AMNA NAWAZ: Judge Marks, I haven't to ask you about a issue that came under focus because
of the shutdown argument and because of the focus on our southern border.
A number of the cases, asylum cases in particular, that originate from our southern border come
from three countries, Guatemala, El Salvador, and Honduras.
The government has said, the vast majority of those aren't with merit, that, ultimately,
these are not granted asylum.
And so I guess my question is, if they can find a way to limit the number of cases coming
to your court, wouldn't that help to alleviate the backlog?
JUDGE DANA LEIGH MARKS: It's not quite that simple, Amna.
It is a very complicated assessment to determine whether or not someone is qualified for asylum.
I describe it as being like a 1,000-piece puzzle, and you have to have every piece visible.
So in order to determine whether or not someone is eligible, Congress has decided that these
people are entitled to a hearing before an immigration judge, so that the proper legal
analysis can be applied to their case.
That's what our law provides and, frankly, that's what international treatise that we
are signatories of require of us.
So it would require a change in the governing law, not just a change in policy, in order
to try to make a big impact on those kinds of cases.
AMNA NAWAZ: Judge Marks, there is an argument made by the administration that our legal
process has built into it loopholes, that people coming who apply for asylum end up
staying for years because of the pace and the backlog, and that makes it harder when
their cases are ultimately denied to get them out of the country.
What do you say to that?
JUDGE DANA LEIGH MARKS: Our organization firmly believes that everyone is entitled to their
day in court, and that it should occur in a reasonably prompt amount of time.
But the reason that there are delays in our system is simply because we have been underfunded
and ignored for so long.
The system does work, when it receives the proper funding.
And it's not a loophole.
It is the appropriate due process that is what American justice provides to any individual
who has their life and liberty at stake before our courts.
AMNA NAWAZ: Judge Dana Leigh Marks, thank you very much for your time.
JUDGE DANA LEIGH MARKS: Thank you so much, Amna.
JUDY WOODRUFF: And one more take on the impact of this shutdown, this time on science.
William Brangham explores the ways research is feeling the heat.
WILLIAM BRANGHAM: There are thousands of researchers who are furloughed or working without pay
at agencies like the EPA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the U.S. Department
of Agriculture, and the U.S. Geological Survey.
And there are many others who don't work directly for the government, but who are also still
feeling the pinch, people like the men and women at various universities who get federal
money for their research.
With the shutdown, the pipeline for that money is now blocked.
With all these scientists idled, many argue that some very important work, things like
the regular monitoring of chemicals, to tracking of endangered species, is also not happening.
Rush Holt is the CEO of the American Association for the Advancement of Science.
He's also a former congressman from New Jersey.
And he joins me now.
Welcome to the "NewsHour."
RUSH HOLT, CEO, American Association for the Advancement of Science: Good to be with you,
William.
Thank you.
WILLIAM BRANGHAM: Can you give us a sense just of the scope and scale of the kinds of
science that have been idled by the shutdown?
RUSH HOLT: Sure.
It's thousands and thousands of scientists who are missing their weekly paycheck, but
they are also running into delays, disruptions, sometimes ruination of their research projects.
WILLIAM BRANGHAM: Ruination?
RUSH HOLT: Well, suppose you have a timed series, and you have to get a sample every
week, every month for it to work.
Suppose you're doing field study and you're looking at stream creatures when the stream
is at a certain level in January.
Suppose you are preparing a space mission, a satellite science mission.
You have got a certain launch window.
WILLIAM BRANGHAM: I hadn't even thought about those kinds of impacts.
RUSH HOLT: Suppose you're looking at insects, and you have to look during the week in the
year when they mate.
You know, if the government is closed that week, and you can't collect the data, that's
a problem.
WILLIAM BRANGHAM: Such a remarkable array of work that we don't really think of as necessarily
being government-funded work.
I mentioned some of the agencies at the top.
Are there other federal agencies or even those that are doing particular work that you know
of that has come to a stop?
RUSH HOLT: The National Science Foundation, of course, is all fields of science.
The Census Bureau.
WILLIAM BRANGHAM: The Census Bureau?
(CROSSTALK)
RUSH HOLT: Out of the Department of Commerce.
They -- there are many social scientists either that use those data or are employed to analyze
those data.
The weather forecasters are kept on the job.
But the people who tweet the weather models are not.
And, as we see snowstorms predicted in the East here, we will see whether these weather
forecasters are as accurate as they might normally be.
WILLIAM BRANGHAM: Do you think that, when we look back a year or two, three years from
now, that there will be a demonstrable impact on the scientific community and scientific
research in the U.S.?
RUSH HOLT: It's going to be hard to measure, but I don't doubt it.
It's very interconnected.
But at a time when we are concerned in international comparisons about how the U.S. science effort
stacks up, this is not a good time to slow down.
The Chinese just landed on the dark side of the moon.
And we have researchers who think that they should be doing work to help national security
and human welfare and safety and public health, the very things that are at stake here.
They're waiting at home for the phone call to go back to work.
WILLIAM BRANGHAM: Rush Holt of the American Association for the Advancement of Science,
thank you very much.
RUSH HOLT: Thank you.
JUDY WOODRUFF: And speaking of science, our next story explores ways virtual reality can
help advance medicine.
Cat Wise reports for our Breakthroughs series on the Leading Edge.
CAT WISE: A quiet journey through a scenic woodlands, a dangerous leap between two buildings,
a tour of the International Space Station, lifelike experiences made possible these days
through the lenses of virtual reality headsets.
The technology now used to battle evil was first used more than 20 years ago to help
patients overcome phobias.
Since then, virtual reality use in the medical field has come a long way.
NARRATOR: Also, V.R. allows you to practice modern surgical techniques any time, anywhere.
CAT WISE: A growing number of medical schools are using V.R. to help students practice operating
room skills, to engage in realistic patient interactions, and to learn the intricacies
of the human body.
Some hospitals are now using V.R. to counsel patients about complex interventions and to
help reduce stress and pain during difficult procedures.
Here in Oakland, California, the UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital is among the first in
the country to take pediatric patients and their families on a virtual reality tour of
their own brain.
MAN: Straight down to it.
And, actually, did you want to grab it?
CAT WISE: Roughly three dozen patients, ages 6 to 18, have taken the virtual tour prior
to having surgery for cancer, epilepsy and several other disorders.
The technology, which generates a virtual model of a patient's own anatomy from C.T.
and MRI scans was developed by a startup called Surgical Theater.
MAN: Mom and dad see me?
We're going all the way inside Jade's brain.
CAT WISE: The family's tour guide is also their neurosurgeon, Dr. Kurtis Auguste.
DR.
KURTIS AUGUSTE, UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital: I tell people all the time, as I'm preparing
for surgery scrolling through MRIs, if only I could shrink myself down to this small,
and insert myself into this space, and just take a look around.
And that's effectively what you can do with this technology.
CAT WISE: Dr. Auguste has been performing brain surgeries on children for more than
a decade.
He's often had to convey complex information using plastic brain models, 2-D images, and
even paper and pen.
DR.
KURTIS AUGUSTE: And then I have the same conversation using V.R., it's just like the clouds part,
and they have this epiphany, like, oh, that's what you were talking about.
It still kind of gives me goose bumps, because these kids, they just really engage with it.
CAT WISE: The virtual worlds of video games are a welcome distraction for Jake Levin,
a 15-year-old from Reno, Nevada, who often has more serious matters on his mind.
Jake has epilepsy.
He's been having almost daily seizures, like the one in this home video, since middle school.
Recently they have prevented him from playing his favorite sport, basketball, competitively.
But Jake and his parents finally have some hope, an upcoming surgery to remove a small
area of his brain causing the seizures.
Before then, they were anticipating their first virtual reality experience.
NATHANIE CLANCY, Mother: When Dr. Auguste mentioned it to us, I just thought that was
so cool.
As strange as it sounds, I want to see the piece of tissue that's caused all these problems.
JAKE LEVIN, Patient: I had one buddy who kept texting me, saying, have you flown through
your brain yet, have your flown through your brain yet?
CAT WISE: That day finally arrived.
DR.
KURTIS AUGUSTE: Hello.
How are you guys doing?
Nice to see you.
Welcome, welcome, welcome.
CAT WISE: Dr. Auguste began the session by showing the family a rendering of Jake's head
with electrodes that were implanted several weeks before to determine where his seizure
activity was occurring.
DR.
KURTIS AUGUSTE: You can see how we strategically place all these electrodes.
CAT WISE: Then it was time to go inside.
DR.
KURTIS AUGUSTE: You guys think you want to fly for a little bit?
Everybody strapped in here?
Keep your arms and hands inside the ride at all times.
(LAUGHTER)
CAT WISE: After orienting the family in the new space...
DR.
KURTIS AUGUSTE: OK, good.
Now, stop for a second, mom.
Look over your right shoulder.
NATHANIE CLANCY: Oh, yes.
DR.
KURTIS AUGUSTE: OK, good.
And then, Jake and dad, do you see mom and me?
All right, good.
So, here we are.
CAT WISE: Dr. Auguste led them to the trouble spot.
DR.
KURTIS AUGUSTE: All these electrodes here, these turquoise little dots, quiet, quiet,
quiet, quiet, until we get to here, until we get to electrode number three.
And this is the source of your epilepsy.
CAT WISE: The red, orange, and yellow dots represent the electrical activity causing
Jake's seizures.
DR.
KURTIS AUGUSTE: The good news here is that this is very, very safe -- it's actually the
preferential place to be for brain surgery.
CAT WISE: While still exploring, I asked mom and dad what the experience was like.
MATT LEVIN, Father: It provides a visceral experience compared to looking at 2-D models.
It's just incredible.
It's just amazing.
NATHANIE CLANCY: I was excited about it, but this was like 10 times better.
CAT WISE: As for Jake?
JAKE LEVIN: It's so much cooler than a video game.
I'm feeling much more confident than I thought I would.
CAT WISE: But virtual reality does have its skeptics.
MARISA BRANDT, Michigan State University: Right now, virtual reality has a lot of hype
behind it.
CAT WISE: Michigan State University's Marisa Brandt has been studying virtual reality trends
for the past decade.
MARISA BRANDT: I think that there's a lot of potential benefit, but we don't want to
be premature about it solving a lot of problems.
If we want this to be a caring technology, we really have to make sure that it's something
that's for and helps connect people, not something that's used to disengage.
CAT WISE: Dr. Auguste agrees.
He's been consulting, for free, for now, with the company that designed the technology.
But he says his patients are his first priority.
DR.
KURTIS AUGUSTE: First and foremost, I'm a surgeon.
I am the advocate of this child.
I'm not an advocate of this technology.
Those of us on the front lines, the innovators, the ones who are introducing this technology,
have the most responsibility to hold on to the things that make us human beings.
The face-to-face contact and being able to read someone's physical cues, are they comfortable,
are they not, that's so important.
CAT WISE: Just days after his brain tour, Jake's surgery went smoothly.
He's recovering now and hoping to be seizure-free and back on the basketball court by next season.
For the "PBS NewsHour," I'm Cat Wise in Oakland, California.
JUDY WOODRUFF: And, Jake, we wish you well.
And on our Bookshelf tonight, Jeffrey Brown talks to an author who raises awareness of
rape.
JEFFREY BROWN: December, 2012, 23-year-old Jyoti Singh, out to see a film with a male
friend, is gang-raped and beaten on a bus in Delhi.
The attack and her death days later brought international attention and condemnation.
Shortly after, an essay appeared in The New York Times that began: "Thirty-two years ago,
when I was 17 and living in Bombay, I was gang-raped and nearly killed."
The title, "I Was Wounded; My Honor Wasn't."
The writer was Sohaila Abdulali.
SOHAILA ABDULALI, Author, "What We Talk About When We Talk About Rape": We owe it to our
kids to not have this be a taboo subject, and also to teach them respect for boys and
girls.
Just I think it all boils down to a basic respect of, you don't feel like you can go
around the world just marauding and hurting people.
And this is one of the ways it happens.
And this is a really damaging way, because we all get so weird about rape.
JEFFREY BROWN: Now she's written a book, "What We Talk About When We Talk About Rape, that
explores the subject from many angles, not so much giving answers as raising questions.
What is it that we get wrong in our thinking about rape?
SOHAILA ABDULALI: We make it bigger than it should be, and at the same time, we make it
smaller than it should be.
It's such a loaded subject.
If you think of one person, say in a bedroom, being raped by one man, a woman and a man,
it's a very personal act at that moment.
But then you sort of pull back the camera, and you see the world and all that things
that have led to this.
It's much bigger.
So I think it is wrong any time we try to make it too much with one lens, in a way.
I think we do disservice to both men and women the way we think about rape.
We assume that men can't help themselves, and we also assume that women are completely
broken and destroyed, which sometimes they are, but often they're not.
JEFFREY BROWN: There's a tension you write about throughout your life that comes through
in the book about having been raped, but not wanting it to define you.
SOHAILA ABDULALI: What defines me is not that I was raped, but that I took this on as a
subject.
I'm 55.
I look back, and there are so many things, and all those things happen to you and they
make you what you are.
It was a big thing.
I'm not trying to say it's not a big thing.
But it wasn't the big thing.
JEFFREY BROWN: Abdulali grew up in Mumbai, then called Bombay.
Two years after being attacked by armed men while out for a walk with a male friend, she
boldly wrote about it in an Indian magazine, using her own name and photograph, becoming
a rare public voice for a crime usually kept silent.
She's been back and forth between the U.S. and India since the 1970s.
She worked in a rape crisis center as a journalist, became a writer, author of two novels, married
and has raised a daughter, who's now herself 17.
In the new book, she has chapter titles such as "Who Am I to Talk?," "Totally Different,
Exactly the Same," and "Teflon Man."
She offers personal stories of other rape victims about their experiences and how they
coped, and explores key, often complex issues such as the meaning of consent.
SOHAILA ABDULALI: I believe firmly that consent is important and crucial, and that it's important
to talk about things like affirmative consent.
But I also think that, no matter how many rules and guidelines we set down, until there's
a basic thing of somebody caring how you feel, until you have two people together and each
of them cares whether the other wants it or notices if the other's having a good time,
no amount of words will help.
We need the words.
We need to train guys that you should care whether the woman's into it, and we need to
train ourselves that it matters what we want, because words are great, but I think there's
more going on with consent.
JEFFREY BROWN: So, you write about why women keep silent.
Partly, it is about a sense of shame enculturated, but, partly, you say, because it often doesn't
lead to anything.
SOHAILA ABDULALI: Even in this day of MeToo, there's really not much reward for speaking
out.
Look at the whole Kavanaugh thing with Christine Blasey Ford testifying, and there were so
many senators and people who said, well, why should we believe her?
She should have reported it right away.
To me, having been through it, it's so completely clear why she didn't speak up.
You just want to put your clothes on and be done with it.
You know you won't be believed.
You feel embarrassed that you were in the room with this boy.
It makes perfect sense.
JEFFREY BROWN: Early on in the book you say, "Now I realize that sometimes rape does have
to do with sex."
Usually, rape is talked about as power.
SOHAILA ABDULALI: It is an act of power, there's no question, but what you're actually has
to do with sex.
I'm never going to say rape is sex, because it's not, but it's a sexual weapon, almost,
that you're using.
For instance, when I was raped, it was this gang of men.
They were armed.
I think they were on drugs.
I'm not sure.
They thought that, as a girl, I shouldn't be out wandering with a boy.
So it's not that it was sex, but there was a sexual rage there.
So that's what I'm talking about.
It's like a perversion of sex.
JEFFREY BROWN: What do victims of rape deserve from us, from people, from society?
SOHAILA ABDULALI: I think they deserve to be listened to and to be believed and to not
have the default be, you're a liar or there's something wrong with you.
They deserve to be seen as people who are still the same people they were before they
were raped and not broken beings.
But they also deserve to be seen as people who have been through terrible trauma, and
they deserve to be supported.
And they deserve justice, a system that actually holds men accountable, rapists.
JEFFREY BROWN: You started writing this before the MeToo movement really exploded.
Do you think that movement changes things?
SOHAILA ABDULALI: I think MeToo has been amazing, and especially in India right now.
It's really exploded and it's fantastic.
But what does that mean, change?
I think it's changed the conversation.
Whether, anywhere, one rape less happens because of it, I have no idea.
I hope so, but how do we know?
JEFFREY BROWN: You're looking back at this horrifying experience that you had when you
were 17.
And you have a 17-year-old daughter now yourself.
SOHAILA ABDULALI: I do.
She knows what happened to me.
And we told her at a young enough age.
She knows I'm OK.
And, as a parent, I got asked this question before.
It was like, do you worry about your daughter now that this happened to you?
But why wouldn't -- I mean, doesn't every parent do that?
I hope nothing happens to her, but, if something does, I know that she can be OK.
I know she can be grow up and be a happy person.
I know she can have a good life, because I know this because it happened to me.
JEFFREY BROWN: The book is "What We Talk About When We Talk About Rape."
Sohaila Abdulali, thank you very much.
SOHAILA ABDULALI: Thank you.
JUDY WOODRUFF: Powerful to think about.
And that's the "NewsHour" for tonight.
I'm Judy Woodruff.
Thank you, and we'll see you soon.
-------------------------------------------
Pelosi, Schumer want to inflame the radical left with immigration issue: Rep. Gaetz - Duration: 7:13.
For more infomation >> Pelosi, Schumer want to inflame the radical left with immigration issue: Rep. Gaetz - Duration: 7:13. -------------------------------------------
Rod Rosenstein is expected to leave the DOJ - Duration: 5:24.
For more infomation >> Rod Rosenstein is expected to leave the DOJ - Duration: 5:24. -------------------------------------------
Rep. Green: We have a crisis at the southern border - Duration: 4:00.
For more infomation >> Rep. Green: We have a crisis at the southern border - Duration: 4:00. -------------------------------------------
Tom Clancy's The Division 2 - PC Features Overview Trailer - Duration: 2:21.
For more infomation >> Tom Clancy's The Division 2 - PC Features Overview Trailer - Duration: 2:21. -------------------------------------------
Sneak Peek: A Legendary Piece Of Work | RENT - Duration: 1:04.
For more infomation >> Sneak Peek: A Legendary Piece Of Work | RENT - Duration: 1:04. -------------------------------------------
After her own rape, author says victims of sexual violence are more than 'broken beings' - Duration: 7:20.
JUDY WOODRUFF: And on our Bookshelf tonight, Jeffrey Brown talks to an author who raises
awareness of rape.
JEFFREY BROWN: December, 2012, 23-year-old Jyoti Singh, out to see a film with a male
friend, is gang-raped and beaten on a bus in Delhi.
The attack and her death days later brought international attention and condemnation.
Shortly after, an essay appeared in The New York Times that began: "Thirty-two years ago,
when I was 17 and living in Bombay, I was gang-raped and nearly killed."
The title, "I Was Wounded; My Honor Wasn't."
The writer was Sohaila Abdulali.
SOHAILA ABDULALI, Author, "What We Talk About When We Talk About Rape": We owe it to our
kids to not have this be a taboo subject, and also to teach them respect for boys and
girls.
Just I think it all boils down to a basic respect of, you don't feel like you can go
around the world just marauding and hurting people.
And this is one of the ways it happens.
And this is a really damaging way, because we all get so weird about rape.
JEFFREY BROWN: Now she's written a book, "What We Talk About When We Talk About Rape, that
explores the subject from many angles, not so much giving answers as raising questions.
What is it that we get wrong in our thinking about rape?
SOHAILA ABDULALI: We make it bigger than it should be, and at the same time, we make it
smaller than it should be.
It's such a loaded subject.
If you think of one person, say in a bedroom, being raped by one man, a woman and a man,
it's a very personal act at that moment.
But then you sort of pull back the camera, and you see the world and all that things
that have led to this.
It's much bigger.
So I think it is wrong any time we try to make it too much with one lens, in a way.
I think we do disservice to both men and women the way we think about rape.
We assume that men can't help themselves, and we also assume that women are completely
broken and destroyed, which sometimes they are, but often they're not.
JEFFREY BROWN: There's a tension you write about throughout your life that comes through
in the book about having been raped, but not wanting it to define you.
SOHAILA ABDULALI: What defines me is not that I was raped, but that I took this on as a
subject.
I'm 55.
I look back, and there are so many things, and all those things happen to you and they
make you what you are.
It was a big thing.
I'm not trying to say it's not a big thing.
But it wasn't the big thing.
JEFFREY BROWN: Abdulali grew up in Mumbai, then called Bombay.
Two years after being attacked by armed men while out for a walk with a male friend, she
boldly wrote about it in an Indian magazine, using her own name and photograph, becoming
a rare public voice for a crime usually kept silent.
She's been back and forth between the U.S. and India since the 1970s.
She worked in a rape crisis center as a journalist, became a writer, author of two novels, married
and has raised a daughter, who's now herself 17.
In the new book, she has chapter titles such as "Who Am I to Talk?," "Totally Different,
Exactly the Same," and "Teflon Man."
She offers personal stories of other rape victims about their experiences and how they
coped, and explores key, often complex issues such as the meaning of consent.
SOHAILA ABDULALI: I believe firmly that consent is important and crucial, and that it's important
to talk about things like affirmative consent.
But I also think that, no matter how many rules and guidelines we set down, until there's
a basic thing of somebody caring how you feel, until you have two people together and each
of them cares whether the other wants it or notices if the other's having a good time,
no amount of words will help.
We need the words.
We need to train guys that you should care whether the woman's into it, and we need to
train ourselves that it matters what we want, because words are great, but I think there's
more going on with consent.
JEFFREY BROWN: So, you write about why women keep silent.
Partly, it is about a sense of shame enculturated, but, partly, you say, because it often doesn't
lead to anything.
SOHAILA ABDULALI: Even in this day of MeToo, there's really not much reward for speaking
out.
Look at the whole Kavanaugh thing with Christine Blasey Ford testifying, and there were so
many senators and people who said, well, why should we believe her?
She should have reported it right away.
To me, having been through it, it's so completely clear why she didn't speak up.
You just want to put your clothes on and be done with it.
You know you won't be believed.
You feel embarrassed that you were in the room with this boy.
It makes perfect sense.
JEFFREY BROWN: Early on in the book you say, "Now I realize that sometimes rape does have
to do with sex."
Usually, rape is talked about as power.
SOHAILA ABDULALI: It is an act of power, there's no question, but what you're actually has
to do with sex.
I'm never going to say rape is sex, because it's not, but it's a sexual weapon, almost,
that you're using.
For instance, when I was raped, it was this gang of men.
They were armed.
I think they were on drugs.
I'm not sure.
They thought that, as a girl, I shouldn't be out wandering with a boy.
So it's not that it was sex, but there was a sexual rage there.
So that's what I'm talking about.
It's like a perversion of sex.
JEFFREY BROWN: What do victims of rape deserve from us, from people, from society?
SOHAILA ABDULALI: I think they deserve to be listened to and to be believed and to not
have the default be, you're a liar or there's something wrong with you.
They deserve to be seen as people who are still the same people they were before they
were raped and not broken beings.
But they also deserve to be seen as people who have been through terrible trauma, and
they deserve to be supported.
And they deserve justice, a system that actually holds men accountable, rapists.
JEFFREY BROWN: You started writing this before the MeToo movement really exploded.
Do you think that movement changes things?
SOHAILA ABDULALI: I think MeToo has been amazing, and especially in India right now.
It's really exploded and it's fantastic.
But what does that mean, change?
I think it's changed the conversation.
Whether, anywhere, one rape less happens because of it, I have no idea.
I hope so, but how do we know?
JEFFREY BROWN: You're looking back at this horrifying experience that you had when you
were 17.
And you have a 17-year-old daughter now yourself.
SOHAILA ABDULALI: I do.
She knows what happened to me.
And we told her at a young enough age.
She knows I'm OK.
And, as a parent, I got asked this question before.
It was like, do you worry about your daughter now that this happened to you?
But why wouldn't -- I mean, doesn't every parent do that?
I hope nothing happens to her, but, if something does, I know that she can be OK.
I know she can be grow up and be a happy person.
I know she can have a good life, because I know this because it happened to me.
JEFFREY BROWN: The book is "What We Talk About When We Talk About Rape."
Sohaila Abdulali, thank you very much.
SOHAILA ABDULALI: Thank you.
JUDY WOODRUFF: Powerful to think about.
-------------------------------------------
张柏芝产下神秘三胎，B仔亲父赠2亿豪宅曝光，身家远超谢霆锋，即将在巴黎举办婚礼？ - Duration: 3:47.
張柏芝和謝霆 鋒他們兩人 的婚姻曾經 在娛樂圈中 被稱之為金 童玉女
兩人結婚不久 後便誕生下 了兩個孩子 。
但後來卻因為 種種原因
他們以離婚宣 告了這場愛 情的結束。
兩人各自過上 了自己的生 活
而兩個孩子都 跟隨了媽媽 張柏芝。
但是前段 時間張柏芝 生第三胎" 小王子"的 消息幾乎也 是霸屏了。
從開始傳出張 柏芝生第三 胎
到張柏芝宣布 "小王子" 滿月
現在大家關心 的問題就是 孩子的父親 到底究竟是 誰了。
說來這位 小寶寶"小 王子"的魅 力還是很大 的
經過網友們這 幾天的胡亂 猜測
甚至有網友猜 測孩子是星 爺的。
張柏芝也是忍 不住做出了 回應。
都知道張 柏芝是一個 非常有氣勢 的女人
自從拍第一部 電影的時候
就已經走紅了
這麼多年來人 氣都是只增 不減
算是娛樂圈裡 面的"常青 藤"了。
沒想到這麼漂 亮的女神到 最後跟謝霆 鋒結婚了
雖然結婚了
但兩個人之間 一直都存在 著一個問題
那就是王菲。
因為兩個人在 結婚之前
謝霆鋒曾和王 菲有過一段 讓人難忘的 愛情
因此謝霆鋒並 沒有放下她 。
雖然婚後與張 柏芝有了兩 個可愛的孩 子
但是最後並沒 有走到終點 。
那麼大家 知道這個第 三胎就是" 小王子"了
這個名字還是 挺好聽的
可見張柏芝對 這個兒子也 是非常喜愛 。
儘管"小王子 "很可愛
但網友們依然 關心著之前 的話題
"小王子"的 爸爸到底是 誰呢？ 期初張柏芝 都是閉口不 談
所以更引起了 大家的關注
只為孩子的爸 爸到底是個 什麼樣的人 呢？而且張 柏芝一直都 是單身
怎麼就會懷孕 了呢？網友 們紛紛猜測
說辭不斷
沒想到這個時 候張柏芝卻 鬆口了
從一開始的閉 口不談終於 做出了回應
或許是這麼多 的猜測給張 柏芝帶來了 很多麻煩跟 影響吧
所以張柏芝不 得不出來澄 清一下了。
只見張柏芝很 高冷
只用了兩個字 來回應此謠 言
她說"假的" ！否決了我 們所有人的 猜想。
可是近期 又有知情人 士稱張柏芝 將和男友即 將在巴黎舉 行婚禮
這位"知情人 士"還透露 新郎就是何 孟懷。
何孟懷
1989年1 1月1日出 生於中國台 灣
兩人相差9歲 。
他是台灣主持 人兼演員。
並且還活躍於 內地綜藝節 目當中。
何孟懷家 境殷實
他與張柏芝還 在綜藝節目 中《女神的 選擇》組成 CP
兩人還時不時 在各大網絡 平台上大秀 恩愛。
看來如今的張 柏芝或許已 經收穫了真 正的愛情
不少網友也紛 紛送上祝福 ！至於"小 王子"的生 父
還是等到以後 張柏芝公佈 吧
網友們也不要 擅自揣測才 好。
-------------------------------------------
(INDO SUB CC) Off Air Making Film - Duration: 9:03.
For more infomation >> (INDO SUB CC) Off Air Making Film - Duration: 9:03. -------------------------------------------
Jan Cartoon | Lisa followed her mother to fish # 45 | Best Learning Videos for Kids - Duration: 2:51.
For more infomation >> Jan Cartoon | Lisa followed her mother to fish # 45 | Best Learning Videos for Kids - Duration: 2:51. -------------------------------------------
Bills survey fans on New Era Field future - Duration: 2:09.
For more infomation >> Bills survey fans on New Era Field future - Duration: 2:09. -------------------------------------------
Trump Is INCAPABLE Of Acting Like An Adult - Duration: 5:11.
For more infomation >> Trump Is INCAPABLE Of Acting Like An Adult - Duration: 5:11. -------------------------------------------
For more infomation >> Trump Is INCAPABLE Of Acting Like An Adult - Duration: 5:11.-------------------------------------------
A Limited Resident Evil 2 Collectors Edition You Should PRE-ORDER now - Duration: 1:24.
Today Pix'n Love Publishing has announced the release of a very special and limited
collectors edition for the very much anticipated Resident
Evil 2 remake.
Let's take a quick look at it and what all the big fuzz is about.
The France base company today revealed a very exciting and well crafted entry
in the list of available Resident Evil 2 collectors editions.
First of all we are getting an amazing metallic cardbox
with a sweet red tinted Artwork on its front.
Besides the Gamebox, which either consists of a Ps4, Xbox or PC version of the game,
this Edition comes with an amazingly detailed 80 Page Artbook, filled with many details,
facts and illustrations from the initial creation of the Resident Evil 2 in 1998 and
the 2019 remake.
If that alone wouldn't entice you to buy this treasure, you're also getting
4 colourfull lithographs of illustrations for the Resident Evil 2 remake and even an
Umbrella themed and numbered PVC card with the "Lab Card Key"
design.
SO guys, what are you waiting for ? This edition is individually numbered and will make for
a pretty rare gem in anybody's collection for sure
Let me know how you like it in the comments
-------------------------------------------
For more infomation >> A Limited Resident Evil 2 Collectors Edition You Should PRE-ORDER now - Duration: 1:24.-------------------------------------------
10 January 2019 !!BARSA VERSE BUNDA PANI BARSA DJ RAKESH SITAPUR!! - Duration: 4:45.
DJ RAKESH SITAPUR
-------------------------------------------
For more infomation >> 10 January 2019 !!BARSA VERSE BUNDA PANI BARSA DJ RAKESH SITAPUR!! - Duration: 4:45.-------------------------------------------
I'm back (Read description) - Duration: 0:04.
For more infomation >> I'm back (Read description) - Duration: 0:04. -------------------------------------------
MT Senate president wants $8M state funding for Southern border wall - Duration: 1:54.
For more infomation >> MT Senate president wants $8M state funding for Southern border wall - Duration: 1:54. -------------------------------------------
NYT: President Donald Trump Said Border Visit 'Not Going To Change A Damn Thing' | Hardball | MSNBC - Duration: 8:11. For more infomation >> NYT: President Donald Trump Said Border Visit 'Not Going To Change A Damn Thing' | Hardball | MSNBC - Duration: 8:11. -------------------------------------------
Fiat Punto 1.3 M-Jet Actual - Duration: 1:02.
For more infomation >> Fiat Punto 1.3 M-Jet Actual - Duration: 1:02. -------------------------------------------
Lindsay Lohan's Beach Club Season 1 Episode 1 "Paradise Boss" Highlights: Jules - Duration: 2:06.
"I need to spread my wings and, you know, whatever..."
"Are you, like, Buddhist, a little bit?"
"No."
"You sound it: 'Spread my wings and fly."
"My family is actually very, very religious."
"I'm religious in the sense of meditation.
I do it three times a day.
This is my own personal religion and the space I need to then function myself."
"I'm gonna watch you really closely, cause you're so religious."
"My family's very religious."
"Oh, the story changes."
Lindsay Lohan's Beach Club, which debuted Tuesday on MTV, is many things, and only some
of them are intended.
Through the uncanny-valley haze of contrived setups sometimes something that's so genuinely
awkward happen.
Case in point is the brief interaction above between Lindsay and Jules, an "ambassador"
who's been hired to work at Lindsay's beach club in Mykonos, Greece.
Lindsay seems to be saying words that are more or less related to the conversation but
not necessarily to what's actually being said.
Jules explains her recent moving by saying, "I need to spread my wings and, you know,
whatever..."
Lindsay asks if she's buddhist because she just said "spread my wings and fly," which
she totally didn't.
Lohan then goes on to say she'll be watching her closely because she's so religious,
but the employee said nothing of the sort and corrected her by saying that it's her
family that is religious.
Anyway, this short clip had me so confused.
It is simply astonishing to watch two people make a massacre out of what should have been
an innocuous session of convesation.
I'm going to keep watching Lindsay Lohan's Beach Club to see if any satisfyingly coherent
conversations take place (while hoping that they never do).
What was your favourite part of the premiere of Lindsay Lohan's Beach Club?
Let me know in the comments below and don't forget to subscribe!
-------------------------------------------
Sex trafficking survivor tells her story to raise awareness - Duration: 1:34.
For more infomation >> Sex trafficking survivor tells her story to raise awareness - Duration: 1:34. -------------------------------------------
【パラパラ】昔、覚えた振り付けまだ覚えてんの！？またやってみた！ - Duration: 10:57.
yo! Natalia Natchan here!
excuse me, ma'am/sir
but have you taken the time to subscribe? (polite Japanese)
if you have not, please take a moment to hit the subscribe button below
and you may watch the rest of this video
Thank you for your cooperation!
if I talked like that, ya'll wud think I was crazy!
wtf!?
So I get a lot of comments saying things like
"natchan, your japanese is gyaru"
And tbh at first I didn't plan for that
But actually...
I really liked Japanese gyaru when I was young
SO I'm kind of happy about that
yeah when I was in middle school
I'd read magazines like EGG, do yamanba makeup
and I even learned parapara
and okay so I'm actually kind of pissed
But I've heard recently
as soon as I left Japan... para para is coming back
NOW?
Even though I just brought my ass back to america!?
I WAS THERE 4 YEARS WTF
i d k
I saw Aoyama Thelma's video
but it was a bunch of different gyaru
doing para para... and it was so cute i couldn't take it
omg... I probably have to go back to Japan just to do parapara
but no
u can do it anywhere i guess
So anyway, since I danced para para since I was 12
I think that the dances are still in my head
Today I want to test that out
So Today, I'm going to try and remember
the parapara dances I learned when I was 12
lets go!
Can I remember the parapara from forever ago?
so today
lets see which one I can remember best
If I mess up 4 moves, it's out
do i even remember?
So lets start with my first parapara ever
I learned with this video i think
ok SO that didn't go so well
I learned that one first but... looks like i don't remember shit
next
So I actually thought the singing was funny... so I wanted to learn it
I hadn't heard anybody sing like this before so
when I was 12... i guess
look at the video
it was uploaded feb 2009
on youtube
I was YOUNG
now im old
and the video quality isn't great either
i got it!
LOVE right here
that'll do.. right?
I still remember! Isn't that not crazy!?
Even though I haven't done it in so long.. why is it still in my head
btw do u guys know this song?
damn im tired
para para is HARD WORK
so next is one... and actually
I used to own this DVD
(LOVE2PARA) so a long time ago
my favorite gyarusa "angeleek"
well i mean it was my favorite probably just cus It was the most popular
But they released this DVD
And I watched the commercial
because somebody had uploaded it on youtube (a treasure back in the day)
and so I saw that
and i was all
the only way
to become a REAL GYARU
is to FIND THIS DVD
and so I searched online everywhere... and finally found it
but did not become a REAL GYARU
btw to become a REAL GYARU
what exactly is needed???? tell me in the comments
I really liked this song from the DVD
(so into it)
I can't believe i remember this!
(got to into singing and fucked it up)
so i guess I halfway remember this
they did this in the commercial
so i never forgot
before I could find the dvd
I learned all I could from the commercial LOL when i was 12 or 13 or whatever
I was a weird one
still am a weird one
so the next one
is also from the DVD
it's the last song.. and angeleek did it
with the angeleek members
this was hard to learn
I remember they had this move
and I couldn't figure it out
idk if i can do it now tho either
please dont expect anything GREAT
omg nostalgia
THIS IS WHERE IT STARTS (thats the lyrics)
help
the saviour move
wtf... it stopped
sorry angeleek
looks like
I won't be joining angeleek
I'm so sorry... i didn't try hard enough
I'm so sORRY... SO SORRY
I TRIED MY BEST BUT
so for the last song
I heard it on this tv show that angeleek appeared on
and that tv show was uploaded online
and there was a small scene where angeleek members were dancing to this song
so me.. being me..
Heard that clip of the song
and searched for it EVERYWHERE
they didn't even have a name.. but I still searched for it... and found it somehow
and danced it.. but ALAS... I was still not
and angeleek MEMBER
it was a hard time for me..
So if I can remember this one...
Please let me be in Angeleek
I don't even know what this song is saying
this move is inevitable
HELP
PLEASE
HELP
YEP somebody is not joinin angeleek today
whatever
this is fine
SO how was it
I... totally can't parapara anymore
well... for 7 or 10 years...
it's not THAT BAD
honestly I'm susprised that much is still in my head
that's crazy
how can I remember para para from that long ago
but i can't leave the house without forgetting something
so if you guys found any of these nostalgic lemme know
I think that velfarre
and misery of love
were pretty popular back in the day... i wasn't in Japan but..
I've heard that they were... is that true?
were they popular?
if you guys found any of these nostalgic, lemme know in the comments!
and if you guys used to dance parapara, or even if you still do
which one did you like the best?
please lemme know in the comments!
im so upset.... that right after leaving Japan
ya'll started parapara without me
this is horrible
choberibaa (gyaru speak for this is very bad)
but.. if im back in Japan ever...
I'd love to dance para para with you guys
don't forget me!
I wonder if it'd be fun to release my own para para song
but... im in America.. and people have no idea what parapara is
well... there are people called "gaijin gyaru"
if you look on instagram and stuff
there are a lot of people with this tag
and next time...
.. I feel weird saying GAIJIN
but i wonder if it'd be funny to get my makeup done by GAIJIN GYARU
Do you think you'd watch?
if you guys liked this video
please make sure to like and subscribe!
and to let you guys know, I actually have started making music recently
So please check that out!
I have one of my songs in the link down here
so please check it out! (if you'd like♡)
see you later! natalia natchan out!
music: DOPAMiNE - PiNKII (Natalia Natchan)
-------------------------------------------
Princess Connect Re:Dive | Christmas Chika Pt. 4 | Translated - Duration: 8:22.
A Christmas Hymn
After finishing her performance, Chika and Clione basked in the echoes of the final performance.
Chika: It looks like my hands are trembling again.
Chika: But this is just because I was so swept up in the atmosphere of the audience. It's an excited sort of tremble, so it's okay.
Chika: So, um... What did you think of the show...?
Chika: It was an amazing show...?
Chika: I'm happy that you would praise me like that, but it's a little bit embarrassing.
Chika: This performance was so much bigger than usual - I feel so accomplished.
Chika: How should I put it...? It really makes me feel as if I've grown...
Chika: Huh? What is this - this radiant...
Chika: Kyaa?!
Chika: Welcome in--
Chika: Oh, Clione-san! Perfect timing.
Chika: Actually, I have a favor to ask... Could you look at this flyer?
Chika: It's a choir concert. If you're free on Christmas, would you like to go see it with me?
Chika: It's a famous choire that often performs overseas!
Chika: Their repertoire is so vast that it can range from contemporary to pop...
Chika: I'm so excited that I can barely wait!
Chika: Will you be free?
Chika: Thank goodness!
Chika: Hm? If I'm so excited, why haven't I gone to see them already?
Chika: That's... Um, I think when you see the venue, you'll understand.
On Christmas...
Chika: There sure are a lot of couples, aren't there? This is why I hadn't gone before.
► So it's a date spot. How embarrassing...
Chika: Y-yes. It's the season, after all. And it can't be helped that it's popular with couples...
Chika: Um, it may be a little late to be asking, but is it a bother...?
Chika: It isn't...?
Chika: In fact, you were looking forward to it...? I'm so glad - what a relief.
Chika: To be honest, I wasn't sure if I should invite you or not, but I really wanted to come with you...
Chika: Eh? Am I sure I wanted to be here with you...?
Chika: Of course I'm sure! Because I--...
Chika: Oh?! It's starting!
Chika: D-don't worry about what I was saying.
Chika: Let's just enjoy the concert.
Chika: Haah... What an amazing show.
Chika: What clear singing voices...
Chika: And all of the Christmas lights are so pretty... It was like being in a dream.
Chika: Eh? Wouldn't I have rather been singing up there?
Chika: Of course, some day I'd love to stand on a stage like that.
Chika: But... When I'm on stage, I can't be by your side. So for today, I'd rather be in the audience.
Chika: I didn't want today to be about me singing. I wanted to enjoy listening to music with you.
Chika: I'm truly grateful. I'm happy we were able to share such a wonderful moment together.
Chika: Merry Christmas... ♪
Ames: Hey, welcome back.
Ames: What you saw just now was basically a dream. You'll probably just forget it all once you wake up, so it's fine not to worry about it too much.
Ames: Inviting you to a concert that's popular with couples - that was such a bold approach, wasn't it?
Ames: Not to mention that it was on Christmas!
Ames: Are you prepared to accept all of the strong feelings she's holding?
Ames: When you wake up, be sure to face her sincere feelings properly.
Ames: Well, let's leave it at that for now. Bye bye. ♪
Chika: Mm... H-huh?
Chika: I must have dozed off...
Chika: You did too?
Chika: I had a dream. A wonderful dream...
Chika: The two of us were enjoying the same music, together.
Chika: What? You had the same dream?
Chika: What a coincidence. It may have just been a dream, but even so. I'm happy that we got to share music.
Chika: This day was full of songs, in all sorts of ways...
Chika: Songs are more alive than I had ever imagined.
Chika: I hope that myself and my summons can keep being of use to others.
Chika: Goodness, it's already this late.
Chika: Um, are you still free? I'd like you to hear a song.
Chika: That's right. I mentioned it while we were delivering those cakes.
Chika: I've settled on what to sing... As a thank you to the spirits!
Chika: It looks like there's no one around here. This should be perfect.
Chika: Fufu. It feels almost like a rehearsal.
Chika: Please listen. I'm going to sing with my whole heart.
Chika: ♪ (Silent Night) ♪
Chika: The spirits are happy, too...
Chika: So they liked it.
Chika: Um, so how was it?
Chika: Eh? You thought I was... An angel...?!
Chika: P-Please don't say such embarrassing things... Jeez.
Chika: ... U-um. Spending today with you, and going through everything together...
Chika: It made me look at singing in a brand new light.
Chika: The time that I spent with you was so kind, and happy, and warm...
Chika: I-I... From now on, I'd like to stay with y--...!
Chika: A-applause?! W-why?!
Chika: Ah... I see. My voice carried to everyone in town.
Chika: Hm? Everyone is happy - because of my song...?
Chika: I see... I was able to spread my song to this many people.
Chika: ... Fufu. Today has been the happiest Christmas I've ever had.
Chika: And that's all because you were by my side.
Chika: Thank you for a wonderful day... Merry Christmas. ♪
-------------------------------------------
火影：最天才的7個宇智波，一位發明至強禁術，讓鼬神「苟活」 - Duration: 7:08.
For more infomation >> 火影：最天才的7個宇智波，一位發明至強禁術，讓鼬神「苟活」 - Duration: 7:08. -------------------------------------------
火影忍者：「僅用一次」的6種螺旋丸，2種靠妹子幫忙，雛田生氣了 - Duration: 6:24.
For more infomation >> 火影忍者：「僅用一次」的6種螺旋丸，2種靠妹子幫忙，雛田生氣了 - Duration: 6:24. -------------------------------------------
Декор ключницы\ Мастер-класс - Duration: 11:31.
The workshop of Valeria Radyk "The Magic World of manual creativity"
Hello everyone, Valery is with you!
Welcome to my magical creative world!
Today we will decorate the wooden blank of the key holder (box for storing keys)
For the work of a wooden blank of solid pine
Materials:
wooden billet
suitable decoupage card or cloth (you can print)
acrylic paints, starch, mold (form),
thermo-gun (you can use ready-made plaster or plastic castings),
acrylic lacquer stencil
any glue that dries quickly,
gas burner and gas bottle, fine sandpaper,
decoupage glue, file, sponge, tassels.
Getting Started:
firing without brush, soft fibers burn and darken
This work is done under a certain color of the interior, which is slightly darker,
brown paint is diluted with water to a liquid state and add bronze paint.
Wipe excess paint while it is still frozen.
After drying, we clean the surface with fine-grained sandpaper.
I will use a decoupage card on rice paper.
Glue the card with decoupage glue.
I covered the work with one layer of acrylic lacquer.
The door inside is also primed with white paint,
and after drying, we clean the fine-grained sandpaper.
For stencil, I use a paste-like putty mixed with PVA wood glue (wood white glue)
Sprinkle with starch before using.
wait a bit for freezing,
and then we press the glue into the mold.
For gluing of volume elements use glue which quickly dries.
At the end we cover the work with several layers of acrylic lacquer,
with intermediate drying of each layer.
Work is ready!
I would be glad if you like my master class, as well as benefit :)
I thank all my subscribers for the fact that I have you!
Channel guests, if you like my videos, subscribe and click on the bell.
I wish you all creative inspiration and all the most magical and beautiful!
See you again!
-------------------------------------------
Online Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy for Panic Attacks - Duration: 9:27.
Welcome!
My name is Peter Strong.
I'm a professional psychotherapist and I specialize in Mindfulness Therapy for overcoming anxiety
and depression and addictions and other psychological problems that respond well to Mindfulness
Therapy and mindfulness training in general.
I work a great deal with anxiety and also with panic attacks.
So I've developed a system for working with panic attacks that is called mindfulness-based
cognitive therapy for panic attacks.
So what is mindfulness-based cognitive therapy?
Well mindfulness, the first part, is a way of developing more conscious awareness of
patterns of reactive thinking.
Typically our thoughts are reactive and habitual in nature and they get triggered by certain
events, certain situations, certain experiences and this happens automatically without our
awareness.
Mindfulness is a way of developing that awareness so we can see the thoughts that get triggered
much faster and before they simply take hold and start to grow and proliferate.
So mindfulness is about developing the skill of awareness of the activities of the mind.
It's also about developing a conscious relationship with the mind, with the thoughts and with
the emotions in the mind, that is characterized by being non-reactive.
That is, that you can stay conscious with thoughts or with emotions without becoming
overwhelmed by them, without becoming identified with them.
So developing this non-reactive relationship is a very important part of mindfulness.
So that's a little bit about mindfulness training.
The cognitive therapy part simply means working with the thoughts that we become mindful of
that seem to trigger our anxiety and panic attacks.
The way that we work with these thoughts is first developing this conscious relationship,
which essentially breaks the habit that feeds the anxiety-producing thoughts.
You can sit with that thought and not react.
Then you have neutralized that thought.
So it's quite powerful just developing mindful consciousness itself.
It Is a very powerful way of breaking free from those habits that feed anxiety.
But there are many other ways we can work with reactive thoughts.
And one of the favorite ways that I like to teach is to work with the imagery of the anxiety
or the panic attack itself.
Most people have never actually looked at their anxiety or panic attacks.
They don't know what they actually consist of.
They don't know the structure of these very important parts of our mind, and that's something
we develop during mindfulness therapy, in general, is looking at the structure, investigating
the structure of your anxiety.
And the inner structure of anxiety is based on imagery.
So we look at the imagery of our anxiety and the more you learn about that structure the
more that you can change the structure.
If you change the imagery of your anxiety will reduce its intensity considerably.
Or at least you can learn how to reduce the intensity of the anxiety by experimenting
with changing the imagery.
One classic method that we look at is to change the size of the imagery.
Obviously, if the imagery is very large then the anxiety will be very intense.
So if we try to make that imagery smaller then the anxiety will become less intense.
There are many other features of anxiety imagery that we can play with and change and this
really promotes the resolution of the anxiety.
It helps teach the anxiety how to resolve itself how to break its habitual imagery and
change to a imagery that does not produce the anxiety.
So we might make it smaller.
We might change the color of the image.
We might change the position of the image, and so on, and these techniques are very,
very effective indeed for anxiety and also for depression too.
I will teach you how to work with your anxiety attacks using these mindfulness-based cognitive
therapy methods.
I will teach you how to do this during our online therapy sessions together and you can
then practice these methods between sessions.
You can develop a practice that will essentially neutralize those anxiety reactions.
This approach is very effective.
And most people see quite dramatic changes within the first few sessions.
So this is a very different way of working with anxiety than you might be used to.
It does not involve medications.
Medications are not a suitable long term strategy because they do not change those underlying
habits that create the anxiety.
They are psychological in nature and require psychological interventions to change the
anxiety, to heal it.
Talk therapy can be useful but it is seldom really strong enough to actually diffuse that
anxiety.
Talking about your fear is not as powerful as changing the imagery of the fear.
If you'd like to learn more about how to overcome your panic attacks and anxiety using mindfulness-based
cognitive therapy then please contact me.
You can ask any questions you may have about how this approach could help you.
When you feel ready we can schedule a therapy session via Skype.
I recommend Skype so that we can see each other.
That is an important factor for increasing the effectiveness of our communication so
we can really develop these methods effectively.
You need to be able to see each other.
If you can see each other then really Skype Therapy is no different than meeting a therapist
in person for the vast majority of cases.
So if you'd like to get started with online therapy for your anxiety and panic attacks
please call me.
Thank you.
-------------------------------------------
My Prostate Cancer Journey - PSA Blood Test - Gogs Gagnon - Video 6 - Duration: 1:09.
Hello, and welcome to the PSA blood test video.
The normal reading is 4.0 or below. Now there is a little debate on that number, but 4.0 is generally accepted.
Now, it's very important to realize that the PSA test cannot detect prostate cancer.
Therefore, if you do have a reading of greater than 4.0, that doesn't necessarily mean you have prostate cancer.
And on the flip side, if you have a reading of less than 4.0, that doesn't necessarily mean you don't.
It's something that really needs to be measured over a period of time.
And it's very important not to make any decisions or quick judgments based on one or two readings.
In my case, my PSA was measured 14 times over a period of five years, and when plotted on a graph,
it revealed an upward disturbing trend.
Now, I would encourage men to speak to the doctors,
and consider including the PSA test as part of your annual physical.
And just like all your blood work, keep track of your numbers.
Okay, once again thank you for watching and subscribing and have a great day.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét