Yt News today: Youtube daily report Jan 20 2017

In order to fully get in to character, and sometimes to work up some nerve, performers

will occasionally make decisions at work that the rest of us would get fired for even thinking

about.

Drinking, drugs, having an annoying voice — in cubicle life, that's a recipe for

disaster.

But living life on the big screen can be daunting, and sometimes it's not as glamorous as it

looks.

If you like what you're about to see, check out out YouTube channel for more of our videos.

And stick around, because we saved the best entry for last.

These are 10 Popular Actors Who Made Shocking Decisions For Their Movies.

Jennifer Lawrence, Passengers We can't blame Jennifer Lawrence for being

apprehensive to do a sex scene with a married man— even if that man is Chris Pratt and

the sex is 100% fake.

Plus, Pratt's wife Anna Faris is in the biz too, so she gets it.

We can't think of three more down-to-earth people.

Nevertheless, Lawrence was still a bundle of nerves at the thought of being a potential

homewrecker that she got a little boozed-up before shooting the scene.

It worked.

Nobody got divorced.

And the sky hasn't caved in.

At least, not yet anyway.

Daniel Radcliffe, The Harry Potter Franchise Let's go all the way back to 2001.

A time when Daniel Radcliffe was young, innocent, and hadn't yet appeared naked in front of

hundreds of London theatergoers.

Maturing in the spotlight ain't easy.

And while kids used to have the luxury of growing up and making mistakes in front of

a relatively small number of people, Radcliffe did not.

The actor started to do what all teenagers do and discovered the joys of partying.

And when his habit got out of hand, it resulted in him sometimes coming in to work still tipsy

from the night before.

Radcliffe has since spoken publicly about his struggle and successful journey to recovery.

Anna Kendrick and Olivia Wilde, Drinking Buddies Some actors are really good at feigning drunkenness,

and others?

Not so much.

But then there's a third category of people— those who don't see the point in pretending.

While filming Drinking Buddies, Anna Kendrick and Olivia Wilde lived in that third category.

Every beer on screen is real, and so is the consumption.

Writer and director Joe Swanberg set the movie in a brewery, and figured it would be downright

wrong to let that much beer go to waste.

While they weren't the only cast members to crush brewskis on set, they arguably had

the most fun.

Brad Pitt and Edward Norton, Fight Club Filming a movie involves long hours, hard

work, and lots of manpower.

Every production needs the opportunity to blow off steam.

But one night while everyone was relaxing, Fight Club director David Fincher kept the

camera rolling.

Fans of the movie will recognize a scene where Edward Norton and Brad Pitt are hitting a

couple of golf balls into the distance.

But what's interesting is this part of the movie was never in the screenplay.

It was filmed by the director as the two actors were blowing off steam and having some drinks

to end the day.

They were drunk for real, and repeating the lines Fincher was whispering to them off camera.

Kevin Spacey, American Beauty American Beauty is a movie about figuring

out who you want to be.

It follows the stories of one family, and explores how our connections to each other

can dissolve slowly.

Kevin Spacey plays Lester, a man at a crossroads.

And while his performance is powerful, it didn't start out that way.

Director Sam Mendes said in an interview that the key ingredient in getting Spacey to embody

Lester was to get him a little high.

The director says that such a methodical and calculated approach toward the character just

didn't work.

And since Spacey is a details man, the only way to bridge the gap was with a joint.

The joint he and Wes Bentley share is a real one, and since it slowed Spacey's brain

down, Mendes argues the movie is better because of it.

Carrie Fisher and Harrison Ford, Star Wars The seventies were a time where you could

throw a party and all different kinds of people would show up.

The stars partied hard.

And when Carrie Fisher was shooting Star Wars, so did she.

The actress has talked about doing a full day of shooting only to turn around and party

the night away.

On one fateful evening she found herself at the same party as The Rolling Stones.

As she told it, Fisher called co-star Harrison Ford to get his ass to the party, so he did.

The two actors spent the night drinking and stumbled into work the next day.

They hadn't gotten any sleep the night before so they were not in an ideal state.

But somehow, they did it.

Jesse Eisenberg, Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice

Regardless of how you feel about the finished product, you can't deny that Batman v. Superman:

Dawn of Justice is a full-blown media sensation.

The movie incited some of the most intense nerdy bickering the world has ever seen.

And if you look at them closely, some of the complaints actually have nothing to do with

the movie.

While audiences have been divided about almost every element, there does seem to be a consensus

when it comes to Jesse Eisenberg's portrayal of Lex Luthor.

On the conservative side, fans could say the performance was… a surprise.

But more vocal opponents have called it "over the top" and "shrill".

In a movie like BvS, obviously Luthor isn't the one to cheer for.

So in that way, maybe he's perfect.

Christian Bale, The Machinist Christian Bale is a devoted guy.

When he signs on to a movie, the filmmakers know he's going to be all in.

And for his role in The Machinist, the actor wanted to drop a couple of LB's.

As it turns out, modifying his diet to only include canned tuna and apples resulted in

him losing more than a few inches off his waistline.

Bale wanted to get himself down to a hundred pounds, but since that could have killed him,

the producers were having none of it and stopped him before it got to that point.

The actor's next role after The Machinist was in Christopher Nolan's Batman Begins.

He had to beef up quite a bit.

And even though we know better, we like to imagine he did it by adhering to a strict

diet of donuts and milkshakes.

Mmmm.

Donuts.

Charlize Theron, Monster Charlize Theron has had a long Hollywood career

full of interesting roles.

The talented actress also happens to be one of the most beautiful humans on earth.

So imagine everyone's surprise when she gained 30 pounds, bleached her eyebrows, and

fried her hair to play serial killer Aileen Wuornos in 2003's Monster.

Thereon is unrecognizable in the movie, and gave a performance that earned her both the

Golden Globe and Oscar for Best Actress in a Lead Role in 2004.

Director Patty Jenkins has said that she needed someone who wasn't afraid to get gritty

and emotional.

And Theron definitely delivered.

Margot Robbie, The Wolf of Wall Street Margot Robbie is everywhere these days, but

it wasn't so long ago that the actress was a total unknown.

Hoping to be cast in the next Scorsese flick, her agents told her not to get too excited,

saying she probably wouldn't get the part.

Very supportive, guys.

Robbie knew that if she was awarded the part there was a chance she'd have to appear

nude.

But because her agents were so doubtful, she wasn't too worried.

But then she got the call that changed everything.

When it came time to disrobe, the actress pounded a few shots of tequila to ease her

anxiety.

The director offered to change the scene to something less revealing.

But, ever the trooper, Robbie insisted on playing it how it was written.

Thanks for watching our video.

What do you think?

Did we miss any of your favorites?

Join the conversation in the comments section, and check out our channel to see more videos

like this one.

For more infomation >> 10 Popular Actors Who Made SHOCKING Decisions For The Movie - Duration: 6:57.

-------------------------------------------

Oh No! More Square Waves! Yamaha PSS 125 - Duration: 9:45.

Welcome to another episode of 8-Bit Keys.

Today I'm going to be looking at the Yamaha PSS-125.

This keyboard is from 1989 and was definitely marketed towards kids.

This keyboard is delightfully primitive, and I've put together a great little multi-track

song you can hear towards the end of this video.

This is a square-wave keyboard, so the tones it generates are very primitive.

But one of the neatest things it has is this voice variator control.

Let me show you how this works.

Let's pick the clarinet and then I'll try making it brighter.

Then we'll make it mellow again.

I've created a little animation showing what the square-wave looks like.

When you make the sound brighter, it shortens the pulse-width like this.

It sounds remarkably similar to the pulse wave on the Commodore 64 and the Atari Pokey

chips.

The long and short buttons basically change the attack and decay, portion of the ADSR

envelope.

So let's see how we can use this to change the sound of the clarinet into something more

interesting.

Wow, I love the sound of this thing.

Another thing that really sets this keyboard apart from its predecessor the PSS-130, is

the number of voices it has.

It actually has 8 voice polyphony, which is quite a lot for a keyboard, especially a square-wave

keyboard with so few keys to begin with.

Ok, before I could record any sounds for you, I had to deal with this problem.

Notice that the only jack this thing has on the back is a power port.

But I needed an audio line output.

So I took the keyboard apart.

I would have done this anyway just to have a look inside.

Fortunately, this thing is super easy to take apart.

It's surprisingly bare inside.

This single chip here pretty much runs the whole thing.

I went to my local RadioShack and dug through their little bins and found a cheap little

panel-mount RCA connector.

So, I need to install this jack, and I'm trying to decide if I wanted it on the back,

or maybe the side.

I thought it would be good to use this recessed area on the bottom, that way the jack won't

end up sticking out like a sore thumb.

Actually, I think I'll put it back here on this side, because…

Look at all of the extra room in this area.

So, it was time to get the drill out.

I always start with a small bit to drill out the center of the hole and make sure I'm

on target.

And then I follow it up several times with slightly bigger bits, that way I don't break

the plastic.

Time for a test-fit.

That looks good, I think this is going to work out great!

Next I soldered the ground wire to the little outer ring, then put it on and tightened down

the little nut.

And last, I soldered the center wire.

Normally, a quick and dirty way to do this is just to connect the wires straight to the

speaker itself.

However, this usually results in a very hot signal, as well as can introduce noise from

the amplifier.

To test this out, I connected my Zoom audio recorder to the newly created line-output.

I noticed the signal was very hot, so I turned the gain down on my recorder all the way to

the lowest setting, and as you can see it is still very loud.

So ,normally, I might just turn down the volume down in order to compensate, but this keyboard

has a really irritating problem when it comes to the volume.

Let me show you.

Did you notice the sound got quieter, but it also got shorter?

It's not your imagination.

Let me show you an animation of what is going on here.

Normally, if you turn down the volume, you should expect a waveform to be reduced proportionately,

like this.

But for some reason, this keyboard is using some kind of cheap hack to turn the volume

down and the entire waveform is being moved down like this.

Thus, as you can see it actually affects the way it sounds, not just how loud it is.

That being the case, I did not want to turn the volume down, so I decided I needed to

do a proper line-output modification.

I located the actual line-level signal on the keyboard with some poking and prodding.

Then I soldered a 10 microfarad axial lead capacitor to it.

I connected my new jack to this.

And, I followed that up with some tape to make sure that nothing will accidentally get

shorted out.

I also decided to tape down some of these wires so they won't be rattling around the

inside of keyboard.

Now I was able to connect my Zoom recorder and set the gain to a reasonable level, and

as you can see, the sound is just about perfect.

I was very pleased with the output quality and the sound is very clean too!

So, I put together a little multi-track recording for you.

Now, I wanted to do one of the songs from Ultima.

However, with the 32 keys available on this keyboard, I simply couldn't get any of those

to be playable.

There simply wasn't enough keys, so I kind of created my own song.

One that sounds, resembles something you might here in Ultima.

And I hope you like it, here it is.

perform an Ultima song, but I simply couldn't get anything to work within the confines of

the 32-keys on this thing.

So I just created my own song with a similar feel to something you might hear in Ultima..

And here it is.

So, a lot of people ask why I always use the same notes and chords on these old keyboards

when I created my own songs.

Well, the main reason is that I want to be able to have 3 different working octaves.

And obviously, I want some bass notes, so that pretty much means I've got to use these

keys down here, and then, I want to be able to have a melody in the middle, in the same

key obviously.

And then, I want to be able to use, some kind of highlight notes on a 3rd octave.

So, by using these particular notes, I get you know, 3 different octaves to work with.

Where, if I were to use like C, D, and E, then I would only have one other octave to

work with, really narrowing what I could do with the keyboard.

Well, I think this is my new favorite square-wave keyboard.

And I wanted to draw a few comparisons between it and some of the other similar toy keyboards.

For example, the PSS-130, and I did an episode on this before.

It was called SquareWave Delight.

This only has 2 voice polyphony, but it has many of the same issues that this keyboard

has, it has the same number of keys, the sounds are pretty similar, neither one had a line

output so I had to modify and put a line output on this one as well, but this one really just

wipes the floor with the PSS-130.

Mostly because it has the ability to change the sounds with the voice variator, but also

because of its polyphony.

I also wanted to compare the Casio SK-5.

Now, a lot of people would immediately assume this is the better keyboard because it is

a sampling keyboard.

However, when you actually listen to the music, especially when you record it from the line-output,

this keyboard has a really dirty sound to it, because it only produces sound at something

like 11 Khz or something really low.

It may even be like 8 Khz.

I don't know, but anyway it is a very low sampling rate.

And so this keyboard actually has a cleaner sound to it.

I really feel like I can do better stuff with this old square-wave keyboard than I can with

the sampling keyboard, as crazy as that sounds.

So one thing to consider here, is that with the sampling keyboard it still only has 8

built-in instruments.

Now granted, you can create your own, but sometimes I consider that to be cheating when

it comes to showing off what a particular keyboard can do.

So I don't generally use the sampling feature, because if I'm just copying an instrument

from another keyboard or something like that, I might as well just be using that other keyboard.

So, as far as the built in sounds are concerned, this one actually has the ability to create,

because it has 8 instruments and then the ability to vary those instruments, so you

really get a much wider palette of sounds with this old square wave keyboard than you

do with the sampling keyboard.

In fact, I like this one so much, it's going to become my new wall-piece in place of its

predecessor.

Also, for those that are interested, as you know, I have way more than my share of keyboards,

I simply don't have the space to keep all of these, so once I'm done making videos

about some of these, they need to go.

I've sold a few of them, but if you are interested in buying one, one that you've

seen in my show, for example, then just send me an email and let me know, If you'd like,

I can even autograph it for you, and I'll ship it out for you.

So, just let me know on that.

As always, I hope you found this episode entertaining and thanks for watching!

For more infomation >> Oh No! More Square Waves! Yamaha PSS 125 - Duration: 9:45.

-------------------------------------------

Obama Foundation: Pass the Mic - Duration: 0:58.

And with that I have just two more words to say.

Obama out.

[crowd cheering]

This generation coming up I've seen you.

In every corner of the country.

You are wiling to carry this hard work of democracy forward.

[crowd cheering]

[taps microphone]

For more infomation >> Obama Foundation: Pass the Mic - Duration: 0:58.

-------------------------------------------

Moments from Pres. Trump's inaugural address - Duration: 2:09.

For more infomation >> Moments from Pres. Trump's inaugural address - Duration: 2:09.

-------------------------------------------

Is America an imperialist, white-supremacist, capitalist patriarchy? | FACTUAL FEMINIST - Duration: 5:11.

The gender scholar bell hooks famously described the United States as an "imperialist, white-supremacist,

capitalist patriarchy."

That description has become popular in certain academic circles.

It is a core principle of many gender studies programs where the United States is assumed

to be a Matrix of Oppression.

But is that accurate?

Let's look at the evidence.

Coming up next on the Factual Feminist Let's start with Imperialist.

America is certainly an economic, military, and cultural superpower.

Yet it wields this power-- in the words of historian Niall Ferguson, "to spread free

markets, to entrench the rule of law . . . to impose order… and to pave the way for representative

government."

This is in sharp contrast to empires from Persia to Rome to Napoleonic France and the

Soviet Union---who invaded, conquered, and plundered in order to enrich the motherland.

Even when the U.S. has invaded other countries, like Japan, Germany, Iraq and Afghanistan,

it has done so for a specific purpose, usually defensive—and it did not colonize them or

plunder.

When hostilities ceased, the US always attempted, with varying levels of success, to create

independent democracies, usually at great expense to the motherland.

Our record is not spotless.

But a menacing imperialist power, we are not.

White-supremacist?

The U.S. has a shameful history of racism.

But we also have a long and honorable history of fighting it, from abolishing slavery to

trying to overcome its legacy.

A recent study of racial tolerance by two Swedish economists found the U.S. to be among

the world's "most tolerant" societies.

(India and Jordan were among the least tolerant.)

Intersectional feminists claim that even if most Americans are tolerant, the white population

still maintains supremacy through a rigid set of political, economic, and cultural structures.

If so, it doesn't seem to be succeeding.

Latino girls are now more likely to go to college than white boys.

And the most successful demographic group in the US in terms of income, education, and

life-expectancy is not whites, but Asians.

Look, racism is still a problem, but anyone who calls the U.S. a white supremacist society

is distorting reality.

What about "Capitalist"?

True as charged . The United States is a capitalist country.

Thank goodness for that.

Another term for capitalism is economic liberty.

And economic liberty is essential to human well-being.

Without it, societies are miserable, poor and oppressive.

Look at Venezuela, Cuba or North Korea.

Compare life in Eastern Europe before and after free enterprise.

Economic freedom, like all freedoms, can be abused.

In the US, we are constantly looking for ways to prevent that.

We don't always succeed.

But the free enterprise system has alleviated more human poverty and misery, and broken

down more systems of oppression, than any other force in history.

Finally, patriarchy.

A patriarchy is a system in which men hold the power and women do not.

Women do hold power in the United States—they lead major universities, giant corporations,

and the nation's powerful central bank.

A woman almost won the presidency.

Of course, that she almost won—or, more precisely, that she lost the Electoral College

despite winning the popular vote—is, for some, just more evidence for the patriarchy.

A headline in Slate declared: "The Electoral College Is an Instrument of White Supremacy

and Sexism."

In fact, the Electoral College is an important instrument in our federal, representative

democracy.

But if it really is a tool of the patriarchy, then women are free to organize a movement

to amend the constitution to get rid of it.

After all, women vote in greater numbers than men.

But, of course, most women don't feel particularly oppressed by the Electoral College, or by

much else for that matter.

American women, especially college women, are among the freest and most self-determining

human beings on the planet.

Are things perfect for women?

No.

But they are not perfect for men, either.

To refer to the U.S. as a patriarchy is absurd.

The U.S. has many flaws—few will dispute that.

But it is also one of the most successful, diverse, tolerant, and open societies the

world has ever seen.

Professor Hooks and the other intersectional theorists view the United States as a matrix

of oppression.

In fact, it's a matrix of freedom, opportunity, and happiness.

Not perfect—but very, very good.

Well what do you think of the "America-is-an-imperialist-white supremacist-capitalist patriarchy" claim?

Do you find it as unreasonable as I do?

Am I missing something?

Let me know in the comments section.

And if you find this video valuable, please subscribe to the series.

Also, like me on Facebook and follow me on Twitter.

Thank you for watching the Factual Feminist.

For more infomation >> Is America an imperialist, white-supremacist, capitalist patriarchy? | FACTUAL FEMINIST - Duration: 5:11.

-------------------------------------------

10 Moments Disney Stole From Other Movies - Duration: 8:09.

10 Times Disney Stole From Other Movies and Nobody Noticed

Intro: Disney seems like its been around since the dawn of time.

Its always been a company known for adapting fairy tales, but because of these thin laws

were able to get away with borrowing and sometimes outright stealing elements from other movies

and stories, and it's something they still do today.

Here are 10 Disney products you didn't know were rip offs… kind of.

Finding Nemo – Peirrot Le Poisson Clown The great Pixar classic about parenthood and

adventure caused controversy when author Franck Le Calvez sued Disney for plagiarism.

The story of a little clownfish who's parent is killed and goes on an epic quest rings

a lot of bells.

Calvez initially tried to get his story made into a movie but after multiple studio rejections

he released it instead as a children's book.

According to Calvez the popularity of Finding Nemo actually caused bookstores to reject

selling Peirrot thinking that the lesser known fish was a rip off of the Disney movie.

Calvez' lawsuit failed and as a result had to pay thousands of Euro to Disney, who made

the claim that Calvez had in fact ripped off their idea because of the close time frame

in which they came out.

Monsters, Inc.

– Little Monsters While Monsters, Inc. is seemingly an original

idea featuring monsters scaring children as part of a day job it's premise was lifted

from another movie.

Little Monsters is a 1989 comedy, starring Howie Mandell as a Monster who comes from

under a world full of them.

How does he get to the human world?

Well rather than a closet, he gets there from under a child's bed.

Not only does the Mandell Monster have a similar design to Sully, but he also undergoes the

same character arc, having to learn if its right or wrong to scare children.

While Monsters, Inc. added a business aspect to the movie and is still an imaginative film,

the influence from Little Monsters is undeniable.

Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl – The Secret of Monkey Island

The video game The Secret of Monkey Island which was inspired by the Disney ride and

novel "On Stranger Tides" had a huge part in influencing The Curse of the Black Pearl.

Everything from the main character, his love interest, the antagonist and even the voodoo

priestess all come from this video game.

While there is a clear lack of Captain Jack Sparrow we do know that the video game was

originally slated to be adapted to film by Ted Elliot.

The project was ultimately shelved and it seems that Ted Elliot just decided to use

all the same material when making the Pirates of the Caribbean movies.

It's certainly a nice sphere of influence that a video game, inspired by a ride would

later be brutally ripped off by a movie based on the aforementioned ride.

Everything comes full circle.

The Incredibles – Fantastic Four Let's be clear.

The Incredibles did well to be a successful superhero movie without a background in comic

books, but while the story and characters are completely unique the abilities of four

of those characters were practically lifted from The Fantastic Four

Violet has the same powers as the Invisible Woman, Bob has the same powers as the Thing

– aside from being a rock man, Helen's powers are identical to Mr. Fantastic and

Syndrome is a scientific and technological genius like Doctor Doom.

While the plot is original, it would have been nice to see the writers attempt to come

up with some more original powers, because despite there being a lot of super powered

characters out there, there is still a lot of untapped potential.

It's even become somewhat of a meme that the best Fantastic Four movie is The Incredibles…

which we're not going to argue with.

Beauty and the Beast - La Belle et la Bête While these two films might be based on the

same fairy tale, there is no denying that the Disney classic borrowed heavily from the

1946 french version.

La Belle et la Bête had plenty of original ideas and characters including the arrogant

villain who wants the beauty who is also named Belle for himself.

While similarities are to be expected seeing as they share source material, Disney did

not claim the movie to be a remake of the 1940s classic but borrowed numerous elements

from the movie anyway.

Other things lifted include enchanted objects that were present in both film versions but

not the original story.

Regardless, both are classic films that are worth watching, but one did borrow heavily

from the other and Disney continues the tradition with the live action remake starring Emma

Watson.

Star Wars – The Hidden Fortress We're technically cheating, because this

Star Wars film wasn't made under the Disney banner… but Star Wars is now under the Disney

Banner now so it counts.

It's no secret that Star Wars borrows from a multitude of genres including science fiction,

fantasy, old school fairy tales, westerns and samurai films.

One particular film that was a huge influence on Star Wars was Akira Kurosawa's The Hidden

Fortress.

George Lucas was hugely inspired by the film and lifted much of the movies plot, including

it being told from the perspective of the least powerful characters in the movie.

Even the editing and cinematography style greatly influenced how Lucas realised his

galaxy on screen and asking Toshiro Mifune to play both Obi Wan Kenobi and Darth Vader.

While it's not abject plagiarism, so much was taken from the Hidden Fortress that had

this movie never been made, we wouldn't have seen Star Wars at all, much less in the

form that we now know it today.

A Bug's Life – Seven Samurai Coming back to Kurosawa we have Bug's Life.

A movie that much like a Fistfull of Dollars is not an official remake in any capacity,

but takes hugely from Kurosawa's work.

A Bug's Life is about a weak and lowly ant who wants to protect his village from a gang

of bandits.

He sets out to find warriors, only this time the twist is that he actually gathered a team

of circus performers as opposed to actual badass warriors like in the original.

While the concept of conflict over food between ants and grasshoppers comes from the Aesop

fable, the plot of A Bug's Life is pretty much entirely lifted from Seven Samurai, being

one of numerous films to do so including the famous western, The Magnificent Seven, but

one of the only movies to put a genuinely unique twist on the plot.

Toy Story – A Christmas Toy So there's this toy, and he's his owners

favourite but he comes into conflict with a new toy that arrives in the bedroom.

This toy is a cool outer-space themed toy who doesn't realise that they're not really

an intergalactic queen of the asteroids.

That's right, we weren't describing Toy Story, we were describing the 1986 Christmas

special, A Christmas Toy.

Pixar borrowed quite a lot from this short special.

Its premise and its old stuffed bear mentor are all elements that would make it into the

three Toy Story movies.

In spite of this though, Toy Story does have a lot more to it than the Christmas special

and the short TV series that followed it and certainly plays on the emotions of the watcher

a lot more.

Toy Story is undoubtedly one of the greatest movie series of all time, but every now and

again we should take a look back at the silly but charming little Christmas special that

started it all.

Frozen – The Snowman By far the most successful animated Disney

film, Frozen was not immune to allegations of plagiarism.

Animator Kelly Wilson, sued Disney in 2014 as she felt that Disney had heavily ripped

off her short in the first trailer for Frozen.

Her claim was pretty solid.

Her argument being that the plot was exactly the same, with the snowman and animals fighting

over a carrot before the snowman eventually gives the carrot as a nose to the snowman.

While the concept of animals and snowmen on ice could have been dismissed as just a mere

similarity like with Finding Nemo, the plot is identical.

In 2015 Disney attempted to prove that the creators of Frozen had no access to Wilson's

short.

The judge rejected Disney however, when a trial looked imminent, Disney and Wilson settled

the dispute out of court.

Mickey Mouse – Oswald the Rabbit This list has the potential to ruffle a few

feathers so we decided to finish on Walt Disney, the man, ripping himself off.

Everyone knows Mickey Mouse.

He is the iconic mascot of Disney, children in the most remote regions of the planet know

who Mickey Mouse is.

Yet what few know is that Mickey Mouse himself came from Walt Disney ripping himself off.

Walt Disney originally created the character Oswald the Lucky Rabbit for Universal Studios,

however when Universal took control of the character, Walt Disney lacked the legal right

to do anything about it.

As a result, he created Mickey Mouse, a new character who intentionally designed after

Oswald who was uniquely Disney's property.

History was made and to this day Mickey Mouse is the most famous cartoon character of all.

Now Disney owns the rights to Oswald again and he's been slowly but surely making a

comeback into Disney cartoons.

We're sure Walt wouldn't have wanted it any other way.

That's all we have time for today.

If there's any examples we missed then tell us about them in the comments below.

Until then rate, comment and subscribe for more updates whenever we upload.

Thanks for watching.

For more infomation >> 10 Moments Disney Stole From Other Movies - Duration: 8:09.

-------------------------------------------

Diva Demands from Donald Trump's Inauguration Performers - @midnight with Chris Hardwick - Duration: 1:36.

It's been harder for Trump to

find people to perform at his

inauguration than it is to find

people to perform in his

administration.

A number of acts have refused,

or outright canceled, uh, and

those who are performing are

gearing up for what will

probably be their last ever

appearance onstage.

See ya in hell Three Doors Down.

Now, this is actually a picture

of the '70s band Thee Dog Night,

but we don't know what Three

Doors Down looks like, so...

We just... that's what we had.

But the performers that do sign

up for their moment in the

freezing January sun will

probably be treated like royalty

for a few minutes.

So comedians, I want you to give

me some items or demands that

you might find on a Trump

inaugural performers backstage

rider agreement.

Uh, Dave Anthony.

>> The ability to feel shame.