-------------------------------------------
UnScape: New Game Mode for RuneScape! - Duration: 2:47.
For more infomation >> UnScape: New Game Mode for RuneScape! - Duration: 2:47. -------------------------------------------
8 mysterious Russian deaths since US election - Duration: 2:17.
For more infomation >> 8 mysterious Russian deaths since US election - Duration: 2:17. -------------------------------------------
We Don't Do Stupid Things! - Putin Explains Subtle Difference Between US and Russia - Duration: 2:07.
Geoff Cutmore: One of my viewers actually sent a question in for this discussion. An American.
And he said, if you take further consequences against the Americans over sanctions, would you stop giving them rockets so that they can get to the space station?
We never use the "get a ticket and off you go" principle. And why should we?
We never take any steps that can harm us. Americans have long been buying our rocket engines.
It is advantageous to them as it saves money, including taxpayers' money that should have gone to build their own facilities, but it is also advantageous for us because it keeps our factories working.
We never make steps that damage business, damage our international relations. And we are not going to do anything of the kind here.
What the previous US administration did, I think, hurts the US economy, the American people.
And as the Obama administration urged the Europeans to take the same measures, it hurts the European economy,
bringing down the competitiveness of the European economy, leading to hundreds of thousands of lost jobs, and it has already led to the loss of hundreds of thousands of jobs.
It violates the principles of the World Trade Organisation and international rules in this area, and these are crude violations both in the economy and in human rights protection.
-------------------------------------------
【Korean Snacks】 Sweet and Salty Flavor! Calbee Honey Butter Chip | Kinoshita Yuka - Duration: 2:48.
For more infomation >> 【Korean Snacks】 Sweet and Salty Flavor! Calbee Honey Butter Chip | Kinoshita Yuka - Duration: 2:48. -------------------------------------------
Lightworkers And Starseeds It Is Time To Drop The Labels And Return To Who You Really Are - Duration: 5:32.
Lightworkers And Starseeds It Is Time To Drop The Labels And Return To Who You Really Are
by Khoi Hoang,
At some point in the ascension process, we all have the question: �What is the purpose
of science, politic, economy, work, art, love, pain, joy, war, lightwork, killing,�?�
or, in short, �What is the purpose of existence?�.
Knowing it or not, we are all looking for the answer to the final question: �Who am
I?�.
Isn�t that the reason we created the labels of Lightworker and Starseed to call ourselves
with?
The game of human�s existence was started with the final destination of his being able
to answer that question.
It is an unconscious game that every soul wants to take part in with an avatar.
Being born with nary one instruction about what we will do in a certain lifetime, we
need something to help us navigate around in the world, that is emotion.
Every time we feel the pain, sorrow, jealousy, loneliness,� we have had the wrong or insufficient
answer to the question �Who am I?�.
We all want our names and faces to be noticed.
Each one of us has a distinguished way of thinking, has specific styles and hobbies.
We protect what we think is right, against what we think is wrong.
We have our beloved ones, our enemies.
We strive for happy relationships and a happy family� These are all the things that help
define our identities, our own existence and help us have the temporary answer to the �who
am I?�.
Sometimes, when we think we�ve finally got the answer to the �who am I?�� But still,
we continue to struggle.
We are uncomfortable with people around us, with the news, with something we come across,�
Even when we read the article about Lightworker and Starseed for the first time, with the
tears flowing as we knew we were not crazy but just different, we just relayed from the
fight �I am not abnormal� to a new fight �I am the light, against the darkness�.
And again, we often find ourselves in the sorrow, helplessness, loneliness, anger,�
that is when we know we still haven�t had the right answer yet.
Because if we have had the right answer, we will feel none of those feelings any more.
We are angry, judgmental and hard to accept the acts of the terrorists, rapers, killers,
cabals, elites, politicians,� Through this, we create the identity of ourselves who won�t
commit those acts.
That is how we keep denying parts and abilities of ourselves.
Do we have the abilities to commit those acts if you are in their circumstances and positions?
YES!
WE CAN.
The important thing is that we will use love to create life or use those abilities to destroy
life.
We hold grudges against our loved ones, friends or other people,� Through this, we building
up our own images: we won�t do what they did.
And just by this, we don�t acknowledge parts of ourselves that we can do what they did.
We don�t want to take care of ourselves too much, don�t do the dish washing or the
laundry, don�t fix the light or the car,� because of those things are of men or of women,
of gay,� And not until we accept that we can do all things that men do as well as women
do, we are not complete and we are not yet who we really are.
We cringe and uncomfortable with some art forms or life styles in which people live
as a tree, an animal or an item of furniture,� That is an opportunity showing that we haven�t
accepted a part of ourselves that we can do it and can be just like them.
So whenever you feel uncomfortable with something, tell yourself this: �Accepting this won�t
make me any less but more of who I am�.
When you drop the idea of right and wrong, you accept everything, everyone.
By doing so, you can be anything or anyone at any place.
That is the final answer to the question �Who am I?�, without the word �can�.
When you accept others, you accept yourself at the same time, and vice versa.
That is why there are no others, and that is how you forgive and unconditionally love
yourself and others.
It is time for us to drop the labels, light worker or starseed or indigo.
It is time to stop all the fights against anything; because when we fight something,
we only fight with the aspects inside ourselves that we have not yet accepted.
It is time to return to who we really are: the light and the dark at the same time, the
infinite possibility, the boundless imagination� THE UNCONDITIONAL LOVE.
-------------------------------------------
So Bad, It's Good? -- The "ANACONDA" Movies Reviewed! - Duration: 13:19.
Jeez.
I hope you can act as well as you fillet, Mr.?
Serone.
Paul Serone.
So, tell me Mr. Serone - what does an actor do when his career fails?
Fail?
Who says I fail?
I didn't fail.
Well, you are in a movie with Eric Stoltz about giant man-eating snakes, so I wouldn't
call this a huge success either.
May I ask what you are hunting?
I'm not hunting anything - just reviewing.
The "Anaconda" franchise, actually.
I've seen them.
Oh, well great - you can help me insult them for the next 12 minutes!
This I can do.
And this is Movie Night!
Hello, and welcome to the show, I'm Jonathan Paula.
Tonight, we begin a series of episodes dedicated to monster-movie franchises; and we'll start
with the surprisingly virile "Anaconda" series - which of course began with the titular entry,
"Anaconda".
So bad, it's good.
Despite negative reviews, this $45 million dollar adventure horror film from Luis Llosa
grossed an impressive $136 million at the box office following its April 1997 release.
The 89-minute feature follows a documentary film crew who are taken hostage by a violent
hunter who is on a quest to capture the world's largest snake, the deadly anaconda.
At the film's center - as the enigmatic and dangerous snake hunter - is Academy Award
winning actor Jon Voight.
His character is certifiably insane; with everyone reacting to his creepy and bizarre
behavior with curious indifference.
His sizable paycheck notwithstanding, it's obvious why Voight accepted this unique role:
the cheesy dialogue and scenery-chewing is definitely something he enjoys.
With a weird South American accent and a slicked-back ponytail, Jon went full-bore into this role
without any shame whatsoever.
His character gives some particularly specific advice to his captive shipmates when he remarks,
"Never look in the eyes, of those you kill.
They will haunt you forever.
I know."
Simultaneously captivating and awful, this unique performance is truly the work of a
dedicated actor.
As for his eclectic group of co-stars; each have done excellent work in other projects
- but none are suited for an adventure film like "Anaconda".
The hodge-podge assembly would have been better led by someone like Sylvester Stallone or
Brendan Frasier.
Instead, we're stuck with Jennifer Lopez, Ice Cube, Eric Stoltz, Jonathan Hyde, Owen
Wilson, and Danny Trejo - who may very be the most grossly miscast players in the history
of film.
None of their character profiles are believable; Lopez is supposed to be a film director, Ice
Cube as her stalwart cameraman, or Stoltz as an Amazonian anthropologist?
Only Hyde's portrayal of a prim and proper Englishmen feels authentic.
Considering most of the action takes place on an ugly boat in nondescript jungle rivers,
the cinematography manages to keep things interesting without getting too claustrophobic.
The orchestral themes from Randy Edelman sometimes elicit discomfort during the scarier scenes,
but often feel out-of-place with the darker, PG-13 rated material.
A combination of convincing animatronics, practical effects, and CGI help create the
titular snake - whose slimy appearance and ferocious speed make for one scary monster.
The same cannot be said for the movie's sequels; as the slithering creatures look less and
less realistic with each passing entry.
This picture is a weird experience.
It's objectively quite terrible, but also consistently entertaining.
Technically speaking, it's a reasonably competent production with all the trappings of a major
Hollywood release - but the script, acting, and narrative are all completely dumb.
This conflicting identity may be why the film was nominated for, but lost, all six of its
Razzie awards.
A paradoxically enjoyable entry in the creature-feature genre, "Anaconda" is a must-see cluster of
campy characters and fun action.
And it's also tonight's featured review - so here's what you had to say about it.
Despite its obvious faults, you were favorable to "Anaconda", with the Movie Night audience
rating an average of SEVEN out of ten.
Personally, I thought it was just ALRIGHT.
Now for a review of the first sequel, "Anacondas: Hunt For The Blood Orchid".
A day late and a dollar short.
Seven years after everyone forgot about the mediocre original, Screen Gems decided to
sink $20 million dollars into this even more forgettable sequel.
But somehow, this adventure horror film directed by Dwight H. Little managed to more than triple
its budget after premiering in August of 2004.
The only elements that made "Anaconda" slightly redeemable were Jon Voight's manic performance,
and cool special effects.
So, naturally - when constructing the sequel, this movie's *seven* writers instead copied
the first movie's boneheaded screenplay and moronic character development.
Beat for beat, the 97-minute film shares the same stupid premise: a group of well-to-do
Americans venture deep into the tropical jungles of Borneo to look for the titular flower,
before a hostile character they picked up along the way double-crosses them.
And of course, giant snakes hunt them at every turn.
The predominant theme in this franchise seems to be that humans are more vicious than snakes
- and keeping with that tradition, Matthew Marsden does solid work as the treacherous
antagonist who betrays everyone for personal gain.
Morris Chestnut, KaDee Strickland, and the rest of the TV-talent are nothing more than
hors d'oeuvres for the hungry man-eating reptiles.
None of them are unique, memorable, or even interesting - but watching them get crushed
and eaten alive does provide for some fleeting thrills.
With component visuals, satisfying deaths, and a fast-paced narrative, this PG-13 rated
project is honestly far better than it needs to be.
But it's also exactly as stupid as you'd expect - but then again, that's why we watch these
types of films; for mindless 'shut-your-brain-off' amusement.
You might forget the experience within a few hours, but you won't necessarily regret it.
"Anacondas: Hunt For The Blood Orchid" is dumb, forgettable fun - and a MEH flick.
Third tonight, "Anaconda 3: Offspring".
Borderline awful.
This discount "Deep Blue Sea" knock-off was released as a SyFy original TV-movie in 2008,
and loosely ties into the — and I can't believe I'm even saying this —established
"Anaconda" universe.
Directed by Don E. FauntLeRoy, the entire adventure-horror film is an exercise in exploitation.
The 91-minute creature feature is cheaper than the Wal-Mart bargain bin it now lives
in... and what little money SyFy did have, they used to secure Baywatch's David Hasselhoff.
But sadly, they could only afford a few days of his time, which is why all of his scenes
take place in generally the same area... while wearing generally the same clothes; as the
story repeatedly making excuses to exclude him from a vast majority of the action.
Missing from nearly every key scene, The Hoff is always 'running late', or 'with the other
team'.
Despite receiving top-billing, he's nowhere to be found.
But when he is on screen, he's easily the most entertaining aspect of the R-rated movie.
Ten years ago, Hasselhoff was better known for an infamous drunk hamburger video rather
than his acting ability... but compared to the theater-school drop outs around him?
He looks like a career veteran of Shakespearean theater.
At least lead heroine Crystal Allen is pretty cute in her tight tank top though, so "Offspring"
has that going for itself, which is nice.
Everyone else, including a angry performance from John Rhys-Davies, is relegated to hapless
walking-lunch for the titular monsters.
But this time around they've gained a new ability: piercing people with their barbed
tails!
Speaking of the snakes, they lack any subtly or realism, and showcase some of most laughably
bad computer effects of the 21st century - the giant 60-foot snakes look like goofy cartoon
lizards; and are far worse than their counterparts in the 1997 original.
The decline in quality of these crucial effects-shots over the intervening 11-years is aggressively
terrible - it's like if you watched the "Star Wars" films in episodic order... but magnitudes
worse.
"Anaconda 3: Offspring" is a lazy and hackneyed experience that provides just enough stupidly
fun moments to be tolerable.
I thought it was BAD.
Finally tonight, let's review "Anaconda 4: Trail Of Blood".
Geez, where do you even begin with a picture this inept?
The unneeded fourth installment from a franchise that just doesn't know when to quit premiered
on the SyFy Channel on February 28, 2009.
This time around, giant man-eating snakes — which now have the ability to regenerate
when injured — are terrorizing a bunch of hopeless meatbags wandering the Romanian woods.
The unimaginative 89-minute script is a direct-sequel to "The Offspring", with the occasionally-capable
Crystal Allen returning to lead duties.
With a tight black tank top and pistols strapped to both hips, she certainly has the 'look'
of a sexy action hero - but everyone else is a downright embarrassment.
The made-for-TV script is so pedestrian and silly though, I doubt if even Meryl Streep
could make it work.
John Rhys-Davies returns as well, as the dying mogul desperate to obtain a MacGuffin serum
to prolonged his life.
Featured only briefly in bookend segments, his entire performance amounts to little more
than posturing and expositional monologues.
Eight minutes into the R-rated film, after a predictable "scientist gets eaten by his
lab-experiment" cold-open, the film cuts to its primary establishing shot.
It's our first proper introduction to the setting where we'll be spending the remainder
of the run-time.
And yet, this 10-foot crane shot of a jeep pulling into a thinly crowded forest is perfectly
emblematic of "Trail Of Blood's" many issues.
For starters, giant anacondas don't live in the forest.
Secondly, Arial font in plain white?
Come on, guys - at least show some imagination with your titles.
Moreover, are we actually meant to believe this clearly flat area is the "Carpathian
Mountains"?
Third, is this really the most invocative shot director Don E. FauntLeRoy could come
up with?
A slow-moving crane shot beneath the treeline of a nondescript forest in Eastern Europe?
It provides no sense of scale, excitement, or — most importantly — geography!
The key tenant of an establishing shot, as its name would suggest, is to establish where
the action will take place.
And you know what other movies are filmed entirely on-location in Romania?
Steven Seagal's direct-to-video work.
Not a trait you want to share.
I've spent a fair amount of time complaining about a single shot early in the film, and
there's a reason for that; when your locations are uninteresting and the compositions un-engaging,
your audience is going to check out.
After only 500 seconds, I was mentally disconnected from this picture.
Worse still, the one alluring aspect of these types of low-budget creature-features; dumb
characters getting eaten alive by scary monsters - simply isn't satisfying in the slightest.
Frequent cutaways to disemboweled bodies and animal carcasses are sprinkled throughout
in attempt to gross-out the audience into paying attention again, but it never works.
Conversations are littered with random and unnecessary extreme close-ups.
While the computer-rendered 30' snakes look like a cartoon screensaver pasted on top of
the frame.
The music is nothing but bland, pre-composed royalty free tracks; and not even the stuff
you'd have to pay for.
I've literally spent more money scoring my YouTube videos than SyFy did on this crap.
And speaking of audio, what's with the sound effects?
The titular creatures literally growl like tigers and squeal like wounded pigs.
Least I remind this film's brain-dead writer: snakes don't have vocal cords!
This franchise began as a shameless guilty pleasure, and has only sunk deeper with each
regrettable installment.
And while previous entries benefited, however ironically, from their scenery-chewing villains
like Jon Voight or David Hasselhoff; "Trail Of Blood" has none of that, and is irredeemably
flat.
A boring, poorly-made slog, "Anaconda 4" is cinematic GARBAGE.
But hey, at least we can enjoy this hilarious freeze-frame of one of the dumb mercenaries,
mid-tackle.
The fifth and final entry in the "Anaconda" series is actually a cross-over with the "Lake
Placid" series, so we'll be saving that for the next episode... when we review all of
the entries in that similarly terrible franchise.
Until then, please click this information-icon if to watch some related videos.
My name is Jonathan Paula, thanks for watching and have a good Movie Night!
-------------------------------------------
THE SKY IS GOING TO BE SPRAYED WITH TOXIC PARTICLES IN A GEOENGINEERING EXPERIMENT - Duration: 10:37.
THE SKY IS GOING TO BE SPRAYED WITH TOXIC PARTICLES IN A GEOENGINEERING EXPERIMENT,
BLOCKING THE SUNLIGHT
If you�re concerned about our environment, geoengineering is something you need to be
aware of.
The sad reality is that most have no idea it�s happening, which is why it�s crucial
to create more awareness on a subject about which the public has been kept completely
in the dark.
What is exactly is geoengineering?
It�s the deliberate and large-scale intervention into the Earth�s climatic system.
It�s done through various means, one of which is spraying chemicals into the atmosphere
via planes or balloons.
For years, climate change and other environmental problems have been labelled as a �national
security� issue, a phrase that�s now used to keep information from the public.
The CIA and other federal agencies control these programs, which means that if they are
already spraying substances into the atmosphere, we would never hear about it.
That being said, there is a lot of information out there that suggests these programs have
been in place, or have at least been being discussed, for a very long time.
For example, a 1996 report conducted by top military personnel in the U.S., titled �Weather
as a Force Multiplier; Owning the Weather in 2025,� reveals the supposed urgency to
implement these programs.
A United States government document printed at the request of the United States Senate
Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation in November of 1978 states:
In addition to specific research programs sponsored by Federal agencies, there are other
functions related to weather modification which are performed in several places in the
executive branch.
Various federal advisory panels and committees and their staffs � established to conduct
in-depth studies and prepare comprehensive reports, to provide advice or recommendations,
or to coordinate Federal weather modification programs � have been housed and supported
within executive departments, agencies, or offices.
What�s more, former CIA director John O. Brennan recently discussed the topic publicly
and announced his support for these programs while speaking at the Council on Foreign Relations.
The international community has expressed their concern as well.
For example, HRH Princess Basmah bint Saud al Saud dubbed ge0engineering a �weapon
of mass destruction.� She did so at the Istanbul Security Conference on December 5th,
2015, where she gave a keynote speech on �Global Justice and Ethics in the Changing World Order.�
More recently, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) published a review stating
that Harvard scientists are moving forward with plans for atmospheric geoengineering
experiments.
The researchers intend to launch a high-altitude balloon that would spray a small quantity
of reflective particles into the atmosphere in a proposed plan to combat global warming.
According to the MIT review, �They would be among the earliest official geoengineering-related
experiments conducted outside of a controlled laboratory or computer model, underscoring
the growing sense of urgency among scientists to begin seriously studying the possibility
as the threat of climate change mounts.�
This statement is false.
This may be one of the first times an experiment like this has gone public, but it�s not
the first of its kind.
Perhaps the only other time this type of activity has been made public was in China for the
2008, where they used weather manipulation via geoengineering to create ideal weather
for the Olympics.
To me, this seems like a grossly irresponsible us of technology.
What Are They Going to Spray?
Using a high-altitude ballon tethered to a gondola with sensors and propellers, they
are going to spray sulfur dioxide, alumina, and calcium carbonate into the stratosphere.
The sensors are there to record data, and measure the particles� ability to reflect
sunlight away from our planet.
These choices are unsurprising.
If we look we look at SPICE, for instance, a United Kingdom government funded geoengineering
research project that collaborates with the Universities of Oxford, Cambridge, Edinburgh,
and Bristol, they propose spraying the following particles into the air: Sulphate/Sulphuric
Acid/Sulphur Dioxide, Titania, Silicon Carbide, Calcium Carbonate, Alumina, Silica, and Zinc
Oxide.
The goal of these programs is indeed to block the sun-light from hitting the Earth�s surface.
Scientists Raising Concerns
Many scientists are raising concerns about geoengineering.
One of them is Dr. Marvin Herndon, a nuclear chemist, geochemist, and cosmochemist, most
noted for deducing the composition of the inner core of the Earth (it being nickel silicide
rather than partially crystallized nickel-iron metal).
He published a paper in the peer-reviewed journal Current Science (Indian Academy of
Sciences) titled �Aluminum poisoning of humanity and Earth�s biota by clandestine
geoengineering activity: Implications for India� that demonstrates how dangerous geoengineering
is to the health of both humans and the environment.
In the paper, he brings up evidence of clandestine geoengineering activity that has been occurring
for at least 15 years.
He claims that this geoengineering via tanker-jet aircraft is responsible for dumping toxic
substances into the Earth�s atmosphere.
He hypothesizes that the increase in neurological diseases and increasing destruction of Earth�s
biota can be linked to geoengineering activity, among other things.
The paper cites multiple publications that have identified heavy metals like aluminum,
barium, and strontium in rainwater.
Another example comes from Dr. Rose Cairns, PhD., who belongs to the University of Leeds
School of Earth and Environment.
She published a paper in the peer-reviewed journal Geophysical Journal titled �Climates
of suspicion: �chemtrail� conspiracy narratives and the international politics of geoengineering.�
In her paper, she discusses developments in mainstream academic and political discourse
regarding geoengineering, and how climate modification, also being discussed by the
citizens of the world (who use the term �chemtrails�), is having devastating ecological and health
effects worldwide.
According to her paper, it�s essential that we understand the �emerging politics of
geoengineering� and to take claims regarding the importance of public participation seriously.
She emphasizes that this issue requires �an understanding of the whole discursive landscape
around ideas of global climate control, including marginal ideas such as those held by chemtrail
activists.� Furthermore, she expresses quite clearly that these ideas should not be ignored
or dismissed �out of hand as pathological or paranoid� and that �chemtrails� and
the public�s perception of them can reveal insights about the emerging politics of geoengineering.
Why Go Public Now?
The Shift In Consciousness
As mentioned earlier, the evidence points to the fact that yes, clandestine geo-engineering
activities have taken place.
So, why is all of this information emerging into the mainstream now?
One reason is because at some point, some things just become so obvious that the mainstream
has no choice but to address it.
If the masses are bringing up concerns and credible sources are presented to a large
audience, even the most tightly held secrets can�t remain concealed.
More and more people every single year are waking up to the fact that many �conspiracy
theories� aren�t really conspiracies anymore.
The NSA Snowden leaks on mass surveillance, or Wikileaks, are perhaps the best example
of this.
Another is the fact that dozens of governments have admitted to the reality of Unidentified
Flying Objects performing maneuvers no known aircraft is capable of.
We are starting to see that a lot of fraud and misinformation has plagued this planet
for the sake of corporate interest and greed.
We are finally starting to open our eyes, and if you are asking yourself, �How do
we stop it?� just know that the simple fact of being aware is a necessary catalyst that
will spark action.
Take GMO food, for example � most countries around the world have completely banned them,
and numerous environmental and health concerns via public awareness created those initiatives.
As awareness about our world grows, even when certain ideas are difficult to accept and
push the limits of our belief systems, consciousness shifts.
Our perceptions, thoughts, and feelings about our planet change, and when you factor in
all of the science showing that consciousness can impact our physical material world, you
will get something special happening.
More people are starting to care about the planet, and that is a very encouraging thought.
The Politics of Climate Change
Richard Lindzen, one of the world�s top experts in the field and lead author of �Physical
Climate Processes and Feedbacks,� Chapter 7 of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change�s Third Assessment Report on climate change.
He knows that all climate science we receive is IPCC United Nations science.
One of the scientists mentioned on the senator�s list, in this video, he talks about the politics
of climate science and the manipulation of data � something that plagues all fields
of science today.
-------------------------------------------
The Takeaway | Kang's 200 feet of putts, Fowler's rollercoaster & Berger's juicy hole-out - Duration: 2:26.
Are you hungry for some eagles?
Daniel Berger serves up a juicy approach
from 135 yards out!
How low can you go?
How about a course record 63?
18-hole leader Rickie Fowler carded a 64
on Thursday, well Sung Kang came along
and tied the course record on Friday
at the Shell Houston Open at 9-under par.
He said the putter just kept making putts.
Don't you love it when that happens…
What about when it happens, a Shotlink record,
6 times from outside 20 feet?!
Kang sank an incredible 196 feet of putts
and wowed us with the flat stick all day,
especially with this eagle on 8 from 30 feet.
That is what 16-under and a six-stroke
lead looks like.
Kang outdueled Rickie Fowler who
dropped back to solo 4th after three bogeys
and a double, but not without some stellar
putts of his own…
A Fowler 44 footer…
It was a roller coaster round for
the recent Honda Classic winner.
After carding a bogey on 12, why not chip-in
for birdie on 13?
Or better yet, why not a hole-out from the
bunker on 9 for Danny Lee?
Not all sand shots are created equal.
Jimmy Walker had a less than ideal lie on 16…
Golf is hard people and three putts are no fun.
We've all been there Adam, keep your chin up.
Because you never know when
you are going to make a 56-footer on your
first hole of the day, right J.B.?
The cut line has been set at even par this week.
To put that into perspective,
just four players over the past 20 years
who have missed the cut the week
before the Masters have gone on
to win the green jacket the very next week.
Notables and former Masters winners,
Jordan Spieth & Adam Scott are among
the MC's this week in Houston.
But plenty more golf and plenty more star power
at the top of the leaderboard.
Get all of your weekend updates on
PGATOUR.com & I'll see you Saturday night for The Takeaway.
-------------------------------------------
Petty Perspective: Limbo 2.0 - Duration: 2:58.
Before the video starts, I'd like to first take a moment to thank you all for getting
me to 5,000 subs.
Channel growth has really picked up over the past few days, and to be quite honest, it
feels great both being back with Warframe content and seeing interest in what I put
out be re-kindled.
For you old viewers, I thank you for sticking around, even after my 3-month quitting of
Warframe.
For those of you who are new viewers, I thank you for joining the audience.
Your continued support means a lot to me.
Really, thank you.
Now to the topic of discussion.
For the most part, I'm quite pleasantly surprised with Limbo's rework.
After seeing how Vauban's changes were handled way back when, I was anxious to say the least
after seeing the announcement for Limbo being next on the rework block.
However, after playing around with him for a bit, I'm impressed.
First and foremost, Riftwalk has been moved to his passive, and the duration from it has
been amped up to basically be forever.
I'm glad to see Limbo be able to enter the Rift indefinitely at the drop of a hat, but
adjusting to using the Shift key to Riftwalk instead of roll has been weird for me.
Obviously I'm not going to shit on the rework simply because rolling with Limbo is no longer
possible, but I still would have liked to see Riftwalk be moved to the first ability
key, along with Banish, but with a 'press or hold' mechanic.
In other words, although I would have preferred to see Banish be changed to 'press to Riftwalk,
hold to Banish target', I do still enjoy the Riftwalk changes, such as the Rift portal
that gets left behind for a bit before disappearing.
Now for Stasis, which is fucking glorious because of the
from JoJo.
Pressing 4 to win has now evolved into pressing 2 twice to win.
2 times 2 is four.
My, what times we live in.
Regardless, I really haven't had this much fun with any frame ability since the days
where Mesa's Peacemaker targeted everything in the room for you like a sentry gun on steroids.
I wouldn't be surprised if Stasis receives a nerf or tweak after some time, as being
able to basically freeze a specifically selected group of enemies is just great.
While I don't have a problem with Limbo's 3rd or 4th ability, it's the Banish change
that gets me.
For those who don't know, previously Banish could be used on any enemy, regardless of
whether you were in the Rift or not.
Now, Banish can only be used to send enemies to the plane of existence you're not in.
It's not a change I'd tear my hair over, but it's one that gets a tad bit on my nerves.
So do I like Limbo's rework?
Yeah.
Am I still pissed about Bounce not being removed?
Fuck yeah.
Thank you for watching.
-------------------------------------------
Mousasi: Pound for Pound - Episode 01 - Duration: 4:23.
Some plants grow well because they have been given a lot of sun.
Other plants because they have been given the richest soil.
There are also plants that will overgrow everything even if you give them nothing.
Keep on going, come on! Nice, take that distance, come on!
Just keep that distance Gegard, Weidman's a wrestler. He wants you to come close distance.
Convince the judges, come on! And you got that liver shot again.
Well done dude. Risk of the game, risk of the game.
Very well Geg, come on.
If there's one guy in the middleweight division that deserves a title shot, it's Gegard Mousasi.
There are people that underestimate him because everything looks so easy.
He looks like he just woke up, he stands like this, he's quiet, he's a nice guy
So the most people think "Oh this guy can not be that tough".
Oh look at Mousasi!
And he's out! -Folks we've got a star!
- He's arrived! The Armenian Assasin!
I think Gegard will be the next middleweight champion.
He's very strong. His striking is strong and his grappling is strong.
I think Gegard's most dangerous weapon is that he can read his opponent.
About winning the title; it's not the strongest guy who wins. Gegard has a very smart way to train.
With small gloves I feel I am even sharper.
Gegard Mousasi's family were refugees.
They came to Holland for a better life so they already went through a whole thing just to come to a different country
and to start building a career right there. You know, he's already much stronger than other guys are.
Well I grew up in Iran, moved to Holland when I was eight.
After one year in refugee camps all over the place, we settled in Leiden, and since then I've been living here.
I live in a farm, I don't have any animals but I have plenty of space, I made my own gym in the garage.
I have plenty of space so it's good, I like it. My mother lives with me.
I'm happy, a happy person, family orientated. My mother does everything unconditionally.
If I have children I will have to do the same. That is something I would do, yes, no problem.
Ok guys in two weeks we will go to six minutes!
I'm 100% sure I am going to succeed in the next fight.
I'm fighting Chris Weidman April 8th in New York, Buffalo.
I see Chris Weidman as a dangerous opponent.
He's good in boxing, very good in wrestling, but Gegard is the most dangerous guy there is.
He's a very hard guy to beat. Equally good on the ground as standing, great at everything
I truly believe he can become the next UFC champion.
I feel I am more skilled than him and I am going to show that. I know people have doubts, but I am very confident.
He's better than ever. Chris Weidman, he will see that.
-------------------------------------------
Project: Jingle Bugs 🌲 (Chapter 4) 🌲 - Duration: 7:33.
ADRIKINS!!
Come on, we've got shopping to do!
Really, Adrien...
How can you possibly expect me to get you the perfect present
if you don't keep up and pick it out?
Isn't it the thought that counts?
Presents are about--
Yeah, yeah, yeah
But thoughts don't mean very much if it's not even something you like!
Next stop!
What about this one?
oh, wait-
no,
No that won't do.
How about...
Oh!
Adrien look!
What am I looking at, Chlo?
Of course I'm talking about that shirt!
It's close enough to that boring striped shirt you always wear,
plus it would totally match my outfit.
And black looks pretty good on you, you know!
Must be the model genes or the makeup or something,
because when you're not well-groomed you're almost as bad as that
mangy Chat Noir.
Of course, you're much classier than he is,
Don't worry.
Now try this.
Umm...
nuh-uh,
not right now, Adrikins.
I'm thinking.
This color is perfect,
and green on black is a wonderful combination.
With your eyes and your hair,
I think it would be fabulous!
I have plenty of clothes.
Of course you do, Adrien,
your father is a designer.
but how often do you actually get to pick clothes?
Or shop with anyone your own age?
Just enjoy it, Adrien...
and,
for the love of fashion,
please at least look at some of the clothes
and tell me what you like,
and not just what your dad likes to see you wearing.
Okay? I-
Okay.
Oh, this color matches your eyes, too!
But it's Chat Noir themed.
What's wrong with Chat Noir?
I'd taken you for a Ladybug fan.
I didn't know you were more for Chat Noir.
I guess there's nothing wrong with him, really.
I just think that Ladybugis the real hero.
She is the real hero.
Come on,
let's get you in these clothes.
See if you like any of them.
Chop, chop, Adrikins!
It's fine...I guess.
I think I've found you the perfect gift.
Chloe, we've been at this for hours.
Of course we have.
You haven't been helping!
If you keep lagging behind, I'm never going to find the perfect present for you.
besides, Adrikins,
It's the perfect opportunity for you to find me a present, too!
[Sigh]
Besides,
I can help you shop for the other losers too.
I know you won't rest until you get most of the dweebs at school something.
Calling them dweebs isn't nice.
Fine.
I'll still try to help you find something for them.
I have known them longer than you have, after all.
That would be great!
Really?
That color helmet with the color of Alix's hair?
And not to mention her skates?
Come ON, Adrikins!
aren't you in the fashion industry?
That would be a real fashion disaster.
Though I'm sure she wouldn't really be able to tell the difference.
Oh, umm...
I guess you have a point.
With the first part.
Now,
I know that Kim is getting her a new pair of skates that she's been asking for,
AND they have a matching helmet that he griped about not being able to afford...
Ha! Here it is.
She's been going on aboUt this brand for ages
and I've had to hear about it but this
HAS to be the right one.
Kim showed an ad to Nino last week...
See?
Trust me!
Female colleague,
Female colleague...
What kind of 'female colleague' is he buying jewelry for?
And why haven't I heard about this??
UGH.
He's starting to get restless.
I'm not sure how much more of this he can put up with.
Who are you texting with that smile?
N-no one that need concern you, Adrikins!
Now come on we've still got lots of places left.
Ah!
Oh, come on, Marinette!
clumsy, clumsy, clumsy!
Only when you're not paying attention.
Hey, I was only a little distracted.
Don't give me that look, Tikki,
you know I can't handle it!
Just finish that trim and lets go!
So you can stop worrying about how everyone's doing without you and start actually helping!
Right!
Bonjour!
Ah, welcome.
Your class is in the room.
I'll take you there.
Thank you!
Marinette!
You made it!
Wait-
Where are Kim and Max?
...and Juleka and Rose?
I thought everyone could make it today-
Did something come up?
They went to pick up more supplies.
The room Nathalie told us to use was actually a lot bigger than we hoped for,
so we didn't have enough streamers for it.
Plus the tree that the Gorilla ordered was bigger than we expected,
so the girls are getting more ornaments for it.
Uh oh,
That's the ring tone I gave Chloe for Adrien Duty.
She wants to know if we're ready for Adrien!
Noooo!
Can I speak to you for a minute?
Monsieur Agreste will be returning early.
How early?
Likely during the party.
Don't tell Adrien yet, please.
I'll need...
yes,
about... this much red...and,
I need...
that fluffy white trim.
hmm....
What size would that be?
What are you thinking?
oh,
I was just thinking about how cool it would be
if Père Noël were to pay a visit during the party.
Leave Monsieur Agreste to me.
-------------------------------------------
Which NorCal cities will increase their sales tax - Duration: 1:28.
IS,
CAR AND ELECTRONICS.
SHOPPERS IN WEST SACRAMENTO WILL
START PAYING MORE.
THE CITY JOINS SEVERAL NORTHERN
CALIFORNIA COMMUNITIES MOVING
FORWARD WITH A SALES TAX
INCREASE STARTING APRIL 1.
>> I DIDN'T REALIZE IT WAS GOING
TO BE STARTING TOMORROW.
SO I'M GLAD THAT WE MADE OUR BIG
PURCHASE TODAY.
VICKI: SHILO BECERRIL LIVES
OUTSIDE WEST SACRAMENTO, BUT IN
ORDER TO COME HOME WITH A
BRAND-NEW COUCH, SHE TRAVELED TO
THE CITY FOR ONE STORE.
>> WE HAVE TO COME HERE IF WE GO
TO IKEA AND OUR PURCHASES ARE
USUALLY LARGE.
VICKI: NINE COMMUNITIES WILL
HAVE A HIGHER SALES TAX STARTING
TOMORROW.
WEST SACRAMENTO'S SALES TAX IS
INCREASING A QUARTER PERCENT TO
8%, WHILE STOCKTON WILL BECOME
9%, AND PLACES LIKE NEVADA CITY
WILL GO UP A HALF-PERCENT TO
8.75%.
A TAX INCREASE CRITICS FIND
FUNDAMENTALLY FLAWED.
>> CALIFORNIA GENERATES A LOT OF
TAX REVENUE.
SO THE THRESHOLD ISSUE IS, IS
THERE A GOOD REASON FOR EVEN
HIGHER TAXES?
THERE'S A PARTICULAR PROBLEM
WITH SALES TAX.
SALES TAXES TEND TO BE QUITE
REGRESSIVE, FALLING
DISPROPORTIONATELY ON THE MIDDLE
CLASS.
VICKI: BUT FOR SHOPPERS WITH
THEIR WALLETS SET ON SPECIFIC
STORES?
>> IT WOULDN'T CHANGE MY
SHOPPING HABITS.
I NEED OUTDOOR FURNITURE ANYWAYS
AND IKEA IS THE PLACE TO GET IT
FOR ME.
VICKI: WHETHER A LOWER SALES TAX
TODAY OR MORE TOMORROW, THEY'LL
-------------------------------------------
How Rich Is Birdman? | The Real Net Worth - Duration: 4:32.
With an Estimated Net worth of $150 Million Dollars, it's no wonder Birdman is the co-founder
and face of Cash Money Records, has released 6 solo studio albums, reportedly spent 8 Million
dollars on an ultra exclusive Maybach Exelero coupe, and is known as the man who started
Lil Wayne and The Hot Boyz.
With that being said, welcome to The Real Net Worth, where we explore your favorite
celebrities, businesses, properties, and all other assets in between, so let's begin
and take a closer look at, Birdman's Real Net Worth.
First off who is Birdman?
Born Bryan Williams on either February 15, 1963 in New Orleans Louisiana or February
13, 1965 in Ford Heights Illinois and FamousBirthdays.com has him listed at Februrary 15th 1969, why,
either?
Because there are multiple reports of different locations of birth and differing dates.
Why?
Who the fuck knows…maybe he's a Reptilian.
Also, Why does Birdman keep changing his public moniker?
Is It Baby, B-32, or Birdman?
Fucking shape shifter alien mother fucker…
Here's What we do know : Bryan is the younger brother to Ronald "Slim" Williams (probably
a reptilian too, but not an important one) who he started Cash Money Records with in
1991.
As a youth, Bryan stated he lived in a boys home and was later homeless, and grew up in
the crime stricken area of the 3rd Ward of Ford Heights, Illinois in the 15 Street Projects.
You thought he grew up in Louisiana didn't you?
When Birdman was either 19 or 21, he received a 30 Million Dollar check from Universal Records
and subsequently went on to sell over 500 Million records and 250 million iTunes downloads.
He was also one half of the hip hop duo The Big Tymers with Mannie Fresh, and his record
label Cash Money Records is responsible for mega hits such as Bling Bling, I Need A Hot
Girl, and Back That Azz Up (Call me big daddy when you back that ass up).. till this day,
Birdman has said he wishes he had trademarked the catch phrase Bling Bling.
To make up for loses, he just kept Lil Wayne's Shmoney...
So Where does the Reptilian boss call home?
Some say at the Earth's core but In late 2012, Birdman purchased a 14.5 Million dollar
, 9 bedroom Miami mansion in Palm Island, which is reported to be the same size as a
Four seasons Hotel.
And in one of the 9 rooms, in the left wing, Birdman counts all the cash he didn't give
to Lil Wayne...Yes, we went there.
Now to his whips...Birdman's expensive taste does not limit him to his home, his car collection
will make any multi millionaire feel broke.
As he owns a Bugatti Veyron costing him $2.7 Million , a Maybach Landaulet costing $1.35
Million, a Lamborghini Aventador costing $400,000, and a Maybach Exelero Coupe that costs more
than some private islands at $8 Million cold hard US cash.'Bling mother fucking Bling'.
Besides owning one half of Cash Money Records.
What other businesses is Birdman involved in?
Birdman recently was called The Donkey Of The Day from hip hop radio hosts from The
Breakfast Club, after Birdman told the hosts to "put some Respek on my name" , as the
video went viral, Birdman decided to trademark the phrase and launch a merchandise line called
"Respek."
Not only is he a Music tycoon , he's recently dipping his hands into the oil tycooning game,
as he formed an oil and gas exploration company, called Bronald Oil and Gas, LLC.
Although there has been speculation that an investigative report by Bloomberg revealing
regulators who permit oil and gas companies have never even heard of Bronald Oil and Gas.
Weird right?
If you enjoyed this video make sure to drop us a like, and If there's someone you'd
like us to cover next, let us know in the comment section below, because money isn't
everything, it's the only thing, so check out another one of our videos, and then go
out n get that money, because your self-worth is your net worth.
-------------------------------------------
Court of Appeals sides with UNM, professors on student's free speech lawsuit - Duration: 2:24.
PROFESSORS -- AFTER A
STUDENT WAS KICKED OUT
OF CLASS FOR BASHING
LESBIANS. THAT STUDENT
CLAIMS THE PROFESSORS
VIOLATED HER FREE SPEECH
RIGHTS.
NEWS 13'S MADELINE
SCHMITT IS LIVE AT U-N-M
WITH THE STORY.
MADELINE...
JESSICA, THE DECISION BY
THE APPEALS COURT REALLY
AFFIRMED A LOWER COURT'S
PREVIOUS DECISION ON
THIS. BUT THE STUDENT
AND HER ATTORNEY DON'T
PLAN ON GIVING UP. JUST
A WARNING -- SOME
VIEWERS MIGHT FIND THIS
MATERIAL SENSITIVE.
IN 2012, A U-N-M FILM
STUDENT WROTE A PAPER ON
THE MOVIE DESERT HEARTS.
A LESBIAN ROMANCE FLICK.
MONICA POMPEO LABELED
THE FILM INTOLERABLE,
SAYING THE CHARACTERS'S
ATTRACTION TO THE SAME
SEX IS QUOTE
"PERVERSE." SHE ALSO
COMPARED THE LESBIANS TO
PIGS -- AND CALLED THEIR
WOMBS "BARREN." THE
FOLLOWING TURN
OF EVENTS ENDED WITH HER
REMOVED FROM THE CLASS
-- SO POMPEO SUED U-N-M
AND HER PROFESSORS. THAT
SUIT WENT ALL THE WAY TO
THE TENTH CIRCUIT COURT
OF APPEALS. AND WE'VE
LEARNED JUST DAYS AGO,
JUDGES SIDED WITH U-N-M.
LOUREN OLVIEROS IS
POMPEO'S ATTORNEY.
...
"Obviously we were
disappointed"... THE
DECISION IS NO EASY READ
-- BUT THE GIST IS, THE
COURTS BELIEVE --
PROFESSORS HAVE THE
RIGHT TO LIMIT SPEECH
WHEN IT'S PREJUDICED,
PROFANE, OR UNSUITABLE
FOR IMMATURE AUDIENCES.
AND THAT TEACHING
STUDENTS TO AVOID
INFLAMMATORY
LANGUAGE IS A LEGITIMATE
ACADEMIC GOAL. HOWEVER,
OLIVEROS ARGUES THE
PROFESSORS SIMPLY DIDN'T
LIKE POMPEO'S OPINION --
AND INAPPROPRIATELY
RESTRICTED HER SPEECH.
...
"Educators need to
educate and they have to
have some boundaries,
but the first amendment
should be alive and
well, especially on a
college campus"... UNM,
OF COURSE, WAS PLEASED
WITH THE DEICISON.
A STATEMENT READS IN
PART -- "...THE TENTH
CIRCUIT'S OPINION
PROVIDES A MORE COMPLETE
PERSPECTIVE ON THE FACTS
AND AFFIRMS THERE WAS
INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE
THAT THE STUDENT'S FREE
SPEECH RIGHTS WERE
VIOLATED."
POMPEO'S ATTORNEY IS
STILL REVIEWING THE
DECISION. BUT THAT AT
THIS POINT --
SHE AND POMPEO WILL
LIKELY APPEAL THE APPEAL
COURT'S DECISION.
ULTIMATELY, THIS BATTLE
COULD GO ALL THE WAY
TO THE SUPREME COURT.
JESSICA, BACK TO YOU.
OKAY MADELINE. WE
REACHED OUT TO BOTH
PROFESSORS FOR COMMENT.
BUT WE WERE TOLD ONE
PROFESSOR HAS SINCE LEFT
U-N-M. THE OTHER IS ON
SABBATICAL AND WILL
RETURN IN THE FALL.
A-F-D AND BERNALILLO
-------------------------------------------
Seven Types of Ambiguity: Susie Porter discusses the story - Duration: 0:42.
For more infomation >> Seven Types of Ambiguity: Susie Porter discusses the story - Duration: 0:42. -------------------------------------------
Caught on camera: Thieves steal van used to help homeless sick Albuquerque residents - Duration: 1:44.
E
OF THE CRIME.
DAVID: THIS IS WHERE THE VAN WAS
PARKED LAST NIGHT, BUT WHEN
WORKERS GOT HERE THIS MORNING IT
WAS GONE.
WHETHER THEY KNOW IT OR NOT, THE
PEOPLE WHO TOOK IT ARE AFFECTING
HUNDREDS OF PEOPLE IN
ALBUQUERQUE.
>> YOU CAN SEE, THE GATE IS
PRETTY MUCH DEMOLISHED.
DAVID: LINDA STONE IS THE CEO OF
FIRST NATION HEALTH SOURCE AN
ORGANIZATION HELPING PEOPLE
HEALTHCARE, ESPECIALLY THE
HOMELESS.
>> IT REALLY FEELS LIKE A
VIOLATION.
>> WHEN I HEARD ABOUT IT, I
THOUGHT IT WAS A HUGE, HUGE
LOSS.
A REAL TRAGEDY FOR US, BUT
MOSTLY FOR THE COMMUNITY AS
WELL. SHE SAYS THE
DAVID VAN YOU SEE IN THIS
: SURVEILLANCE VIDEO PROVIDED
HELP TO SO MANY.
>> THERE ARE HUNDREDS OF PEOPLE
THAT DEPEND ON IT.
DAVID AND NOW THAT VAN IS GONE
: TAKEN BY THIEVES OVERNIGHT.
>> TWO SUSPECTS REPORTEDLY CUT
THROUGH THE SIDE OF THE FENCE
HERE, BEFORE FINDING THE CAN AND
BREAKING THROUGH THE WINDOW WITH
A ROCK.
THEY THEN RAMMED THROUGH THE
FRONT GATE, LEAVING PIECES OF
THE VAN BEHIND.
>> WE USE IT EVERY DAY, AND EVEN
ON THE WEEKENDS.
SO, WE HAVE THINGS PLANNED.
AND THOSE THINGS ARE GOING TO
HAVE TO BE TEMPORARILY
POSTPONED.
AND IT CREATES A PROBLEM FOR OUR
PATIENTS WHO DEPEND ON US.
DAVID: STONE TELLS US HER
MESSAGE TO THE THIEVES ISN'T ONE
OF ANGER, OR OF REVENGE.
INSTEAD, SHE SIMPLY WANTS THE
VAN BACK, SO PATIENTS WON'T MISS
OUT ON THE CARE THEY NEED.
>> WHOEVER TOOK IT, I THINK IF
THEY CAN REALIZE WHAT THEY'VE
ACTUALLY DONE, IT'S MORE THAN A
VEHICLE FOR US.
IT'S ACCESS TO CARE FOR MANY
PATIENTS.
DAVID: STONE TELLS US THEY HAVE
A SECOND VEHICLE THAT IS USUALLY
PARKED RIGHT NEXT TO THAT VAN,
-------------------------------------------
What is wrong? (3) (Grammar Practice) [ ForB English Lesson ] - Duration: 3:16.
Hello, everyone and welcome back to another lesson of ForB English.
I'm Gabriella and in today's lesson, you're looking at what's wrong in the sentence.
So I'm going to give you a sentence in English with a small mistake
and you are going to check so there is one mistake.
Please look out for it.
Let's begin.
I'm very exciting about the latest movie.
I'm very exciting about the latest movie.
What is the mistake?
Let's try it again a little bit slower. Are you ready?
I'm very exciting about the latest movie.
I'm very exciting about the latest movie.
So what is the mistake?
Did you get it?
Now I'm going to show you the sentence.
I'm very exciting about the latest movie.
So there is one mistake.
What is it?
Well, the mistake is "exciting", because this should be "excited".
Now the difference between this is how we use the words "exciting" and "excited".
Now a thing is usually "exciting".
Now, this is easy to remember and I'm going to give you a little hint.
The word ends in "ing" so think about a "thing" is "exciting".
So that's the way to remember that one and it's the same for other adjectives;
other describing words, like "boring", "interesting".
Now if it's about a person then the ending changes to "-ed".
For example "I am excited about the latest movie."
"I am excited about going out" or any situation.
It's the same with "interesting" and "interested".
"I am interested in the movie."
If you said "I'm exciting" it sounds like you're giving yourself a compliment,
like "I'm great! I'm exciting!"
So be careful!
It's a small mistake but it changes the meaning and it sounds very strange in English.
So let's practice the correct version of this sentence now.
So please repeat after me.
I'm very excited about the latest movie.
Very good. One more time.
I'm very excited about the latest movie.
Great job!
So now you know how to talk about movies and many types of adjectives too.
Thank you very much for watching.
I'm Gabriella and you're watching ForB English.
Please like this video if you liked it and remember to subscribe to our channel.
Bye!
-------------------------------------------
Voters Tuesday will be asked to decide if they support wheel tax - Duration: 1:27.
ELECTION.
THE VOTE IS NOT BINDING BUT, AS
KENT WAINSCOTT REPORTS, THE
QUESTION HAS PEOPLE TALKING.
>> A 60-DOLLAR HIKE IN YOUR
VEHICLE REGISTRATION FEE.
MILWAUKEE COUNTY VOTERS ARE
BEING ASKED WHETHER THEY SUPPORT
IT.
AN EASY QUESTION, BUT NOT AN
EASY TOPIC.
>> WE EACH PITCH IN 60-BUCKS AND
WE GET A BETTER WAY TO MOVE OUR
CARS AROUND.
THAT'S OK WITH ME.
>> I FELT THE $60 WHEEL TAX WAS
A BURDEN I DIDN'T NEED TO PAY
FOR.
60 DOLLARS IS THE AMOUNT COUNTY
EXECUTIVE CHRIS ABELE SAYS IS
NEEDED TO MEET THE COUNTY'S
TRANSPORTATION DEMANDS.
>> IT'S THE BUSES, IT'S THE
FARES, IT'S THE ROADS.
IF WE DON'T GET THIS, PEOPLE
NEED TO UNDERSTAND THERE ARE
GOING TO BE VERY SIGNIFICANT
CUTS.
>> ABELE'S NAME IS RIGHT IN THE
BALLOT QUESTION, ASKING VOTERS
WHETHER THEY SUPPORT HIS
PROPOSAL FOR THE 60-DOLLAR WHEEL
TAX.
THE COUNTY BOARD EARLIER AGREED
TO A $30 FEE BUT ALSO WANTED THE
, QUESTION ON THE BALLOT.
>> NOW THIS VOTE ISN'T BINDING,
BUT SOME COUNTY SUPERVISORS,
EVEN SOME WHO DON'T SUPPORT A
WHEEL TAX, SAY THEY BELIEVE IT'S
IMPORTANT TO HEAR FROM THE
VOTERS ON THIS.
>> I DON'T ANTICIPATE THE WHEEL
TAX PASSING, BUT I HAVE BEEN
SURPRISED BEFORE.
>> BUT ONE THING IS CERTAIN,
OPINIONS ARE STRONG ON BOTH
SIDES OF THE QUESTION.
>> THERE'S GOT TO BE ANOTHER WAY
TO FIND MONEY THAN DIGGING INTO
THE POCKETS OF THE EVERYDAY GUY.
>> MONEY IS TIGHT BUT WE NEED
THEM FOR STRUCTURE, SO WE HAVE
TO BITE THE BULLET.
-------------------------------------------
Retirement Day: A look back at Mike Anderson's career at WISN 12 News - Duration: 5:27.
TAKE A LOOK.
>> ANNOUNCER, THIS IS CHANNEL 12
NEWS WITH MIKE ANDERSON AND THE
CHANNEL 12 NEWS TEAM.
>> FOR 36 YEARS, MIKE ANDERSON
HAS SHOWN US HOW HIS SMARTS AND
HIS HEART,
MIKE: THE MORE YOU HERE ABOUT
THE STORY, THE SATYR IT GETS.
>> ARE KEY TO HIS REPORTING
>> MANY OF THE FACES YOU SEE ARE
THE FACES OF THOSE CAUGHT IN THE
LINE OF FIRE.
THAT'S NOT AN EASY STORY TO
REPORT.
>> BACK IN 1981, THIS WAS THE
NEWS ROOM WHERE MIKE AND I FIRST
MET.
>> MILWAUKEE'S TV NEWS RACE,
IT'S GETTING CLOSER BY THE
MINUTE.
THAT'S WHEN MIKE, HIS STYLE
GROOMED IN BIRMINGHAM,
THEN SEATLLE TV, JOINED OUR
SCRAPPY NEWS TEAM, ALREADY
MAKING MAJOR STRIDES IN
MILWAUKEE.
>> CHANNEL 12 ACTION NEWS, YOU
SHOULD SEE AS NOW.
>> BEHIND-THE-SCENES WE HAD TO
HUSTLE UP AND DOWN TO GET OUR
STORIES ON THE AIR.
TODAY, IT LEADS TO THE 12 NEWS
ARCHIVE.
SOME OF HIS EARLIEST STORIES.
MIKE: THEY WANT OFFICIALS HERE
TO START LEVELING WITH THEM.
IT WILL TAKE AN ADDITIONAL $50
MILLION TO PROVIDE A SAME MODEST
SERVICE IN 1982.
>> HIS DESK IS A MEMORY LANE OF
ITS OWN.
MIKE: MY PARENTS WERE JUST FULL
OF ADVICE.
>> HELLO EVERYONE, I'M COMING TO
YOU FROM NEW ORLEANS WARD.
MIKE: WHEN I LOOKED AT IT AND
THOUGHT FOR THE FIRST TIME
MYSELF, I ALMOST LOST WORDS TO
DESCRIBE WHAT I WAS LOOKING AT.
>> BACK TO HIS DESKTOP DISPLAY,
HIS PRIDE AND JOY.
MICHAEL JUNIOR, JUST A BABY WHEN
MILWAUKEE BECAME HOME.
WHEN DAD WAS ENACTED INTO THE
DOG ENOUGH -- AND NOT EURO CLASS
OF THE SILVER CIRCLE REWARDS IN
2009, A GROWN UP MIKE JUNIOR DID
THE HONORS.
>> HE NEVER HAD A BIG EGO AND
NEVER MADE A BIG DEAL ABOUT WHAT
HE DID FOR HIS JOB.
WHEN HE CAME HOME, IT WAS ALL
ABOUT ME AND NICOLE.
I LOVE HER GUYS -- A LOT OF GUYS
MIGHT GO FISHING OR SOMETHING,
HIS WAS MUSIC.
♪
>> MANY OF YOU DON'T EVEN KNOW,
MIKE IS AN ACCOMPLISHED
MUSICIAN, HE EVEN HIT THE
BILLBOARD CHARTS.
♪
WHICH MAKES HIS 2003 INTERVIEW
OF BLUES GREAT BB KING EVEN MO
MEMORABLE.
MIKE: HOW LONG DO PLAN ON
CONTINUING IT?
>> YOU'RE ASKING THE WRONG GUY,
YOU HAVE TO GO UPSTAIRS.
AS LONG AS MY HEALTH IS GOOD, HE
WILL STILL COME TO MY CONCERTS,
ON MY CDS, I SEE NO REASON TO
STOP. ♪
>> ALLOW US NOW TO SING HIS
PRAISES.
>> IT IS HARD TO BELIEVE WE ARE
SHOOTING A GOODBYE VIDEO.
JOYCE: IT REALLY IS.
IS PROBABLY ONE OF THE MOST
POPULAR PEOPLE IN OUR NEWSROOM.
WE WALKED DOWN AND SAY WE HAVE
OUR CHANNEL FOLLOWS, EVERYONE
KNOWS MIKE.
MIKE COMES IN EVERYONE FLOCKS.
>> WE ARE GOING TO MISS YOU
AROUND HERE.
YOUR VOICE.
YOU LEFT A MARK.
>> WITH CHANGES THROUGH THE
YEARS, HE ALWAYS DID HIS JOB THE
VERY BEST HE COULD.
>> HE IS THE NICEST GUY IN THE
NEWSROOM AND HAS ALWAYS BEEN
KIND TO ME.
>> I'VE ONLY BEEN HERE FOR OVER
TWO YEARS AND I CAN TO YOU, THE
FIRST DAY I WALKED IN, MIGHT --
MIKE ANDERSON WALKED UP TO ME
AND SAID WELCOME TO THE TEAM.
>> TO SAY YOU'RE GOING TO BE
MISSED IS A HUGE UNDERSTATEMENT.
YOU ARE THE COOLEST GUY THAT HAS
EVER BEEN IN MILWAUKEE
TELEVISION.
>> YOU KNOW WHAT I'M GOING TO
MISS MOST?
HIS LAP.
JOYCE: HE'S OVER THERE WITH HIS
HEADPHONES ON, HUMMING.
>>'S STORIES, I'LL IS UP TO
WATCH.
I KNOW THERE IS GOING TO BE THAT
TOUCH OF MIKE ANDERSON THAT NO
ONE ELSE CAN PUT INTO THE STORY.
IT IS BEEN A PLEASURE WORKING
WITH YOU MIKE.
>> THE FIRST THING I -- THE
FIRST TIME A METS MIKE, THE
FIRST WHERE THEY CAN TO MIND WAS
KIND.
I CAN'T BELIEVE THAT A GUY THAT
HAS BEEN UP VETERAN BROADCASTER
WAS THAT KIND.
MIKE: AFTER OPRAH, THE NEWS IS
LIVE AT FIVE.
>> HAS OFF TO YOU MIKE.
WISN 12 NEWS IS FOREVER HONORED
YOU SET OUT TO BE HERE FOR THREE
YEARS.
MULTIPLY THAT BY 12 AND GRACED
US WITH 36.
MIKE: EVERYONE IS HAVING A GOOD
TIME IT SEEMS.
REPORTING LIVE HERE AT MILLER
PARK.
IN SHERMAN PARK.
IN WAUKESHA COUNTY.
IN GREENFIELD.
MIKE ANDERSON, WISN 12 NEWS
MILWAUKEE.
-------------------------------------------
Dora and Friends Halloween Dress Up Parade Fun Game for Children HD Baby Video Part 2 - How to play - Duration: 9:27.
Dora and Friends Halloween Dress Up Parade Fun Game for Children HD Baby Video Part 2 - How to play game
-------------------------------------------
What is wrong? (3) (Grammar Practice) [ ForB English Lesson ] - Duration: 3:16.Hello, everyone and welcome back to another lesson of ForB English.
I'm Gabriella and in today's lesson, you're looking at what's wrong in the sentence.
So I'm going to give you a sentence in English with a small mistake
and you are going to check so there is one mistake.
Please look out for it.
Let's begin.
I'm very exciting about the latest movie.
I'm very exciting about the latest movie.
What is the mistake?
Let's try it again a little bit slower. Are you ready?
I'm very exciting about the latest movie.
I'm very exciting about the latest movie.
So what is the mistake?
Did you get it?
Now I'm going to show you the sentence.
I'm very exciting about the latest movie.
So there is one mistake.
What is it?
Well, the mistake is "exciting", because this should be "excited".
Now the difference between this is how we use the words "exciting" and "excited".
Now a thing is usually "exciting".
Now, this is easy to remember and I'm going to give you a little hint.
The word ends in "ing" so think about a "thing" is "exciting".
So that's the way to remember that one and it's the same for other adjectives;
other describing words, like "boring", "interesting".
Now if it's about a person then the ending changes to "-ed".
For example "I am excited about the latest movie."
"I am excited about going out" or any situation.
It's the same with "interesting" and "interested".
"I am interested in the movie."
If you said "I'm exciting" it sounds like you're giving yourself a compliment,
like "I'm great! I'm exciting!"
So be careful!
It's a small mistake but it changes the meaning and it sounds very strange in English.
So let's practice the correct version of this sentence now.
So please repeat after me.
I'm very excited about the latest movie.
Very good. One more time.
I'm very excited about the latest movie.
Great job!
So now you know how to talk about movies and many types of adjectives too.
Thank you very much for watching.
I'm Gabriella and you're watching ForB English.
Please like this video if you liked it and remember to subscribe to our channel.
Bye!
-------------------------------------------
BMW 2 Serie Coupé 225D SPORT-AUT.*!*M-PAKKET/KEYLESS/SPORTLEER/PROFNAVI*!* - Duration: 0:59.
For more infomation >> BMW 2 Serie Coupé 225D SPORT-AUT.*!*M-PAKKET/KEYLESS/SPORTLEER/PROFNAVI*!* - Duration: 0:59. -------------------------------------------
【Korean Snacks】 Sweet and Salty Flavor! Calbee Honey Butter Chip | Kinoshita Yuka - Duration: 2:48. For more infomation >> 【Korean Snacks】 Sweet and Salty Flavor! Calbee Honey Butter Chip | Kinoshita Yuka - Duration: 2:48. -------------------------------------------
Famosos Al Rojo Vivo: Resumen de farándula de hoy | Al Rojo Vivo | Telemundo - Duration: 13:54.
For more infomation >> Famosos Al Rojo Vivo: Resumen de farándula de hoy | Al Rojo Vivo | Telemundo - Duration: 13:54. -------------------------------------------
Ford Transit personenbus prijs incl btw - Duration: 0:49.
For more infomation >> Ford Transit personenbus prijs incl btw - Duration: 0:49. -------------------------------------------
M. Asam VINOLIFT Hydro Eye Serum Duo - Duration: 5:19.
For more infomation >> M. Asam VINOLIFT Hydro Eye Serum Duo - Duration: 5:19. -------------------------------------------
So Bad, It's Good? -- The "ANACONDA" Movies Reviewed! - Duration: 13:19.Jeez.
I hope you can act as well as you fillet, Mr.?
Serone.
Paul Serone.
So, tell me Mr. Serone - what does an actor do when his career fails?
Fail?
Who says I fail?
I didn't fail.
Well, you are in a movie with Eric Stoltz about giant man-eating snakes, so I wouldn't
call this a huge success either.
May I ask what you are hunting?
I'm not hunting anything - just reviewing.
The "Anaconda" franchise, actually.
I've seen them.
Oh, well great - you can help me insult them for the next 12 minutes!
This I can do.
And this is Movie Night!
Hello, and welcome to the show, I'm Jonathan Paula.
Tonight, we begin a series of episodes dedicated to monster-movie franchises; and we'll start
with the surprisingly virile "Anaconda" series - which of course began with the titular entry,
"Anaconda".
So bad, it's good.
Despite negative reviews, this $45 million dollar adventure horror film from Luis Llosa
grossed an impressive $136 million at the box office following its April 1997 release.
The 89-minute feature follows a documentary film crew who are taken hostage by a violent
hunter who is on a quest to capture the world's largest snake, the deadly anaconda.
At the film's center - as the enigmatic and dangerous snake hunter - is Academy Award
winning actor Jon Voight.
His character is certifiably insane; with everyone reacting to his creepy and bizarre
behavior with curious indifference.
His sizable paycheck notwithstanding, it's obvious why Voight accepted this unique role:
the cheesy dialogue and scenery-chewing is definitely something he enjoys.
With a weird South American accent and a slicked-back ponytail, Jon went full-bore into this role
without any shame whatsoever.
His character gives some particularly specific advice to his captive shipmates when he remarks,
"Never look in the eyes, of those you kill.
They will haunt you forever.
I know."
Simultaneously captivating and awful, this unique performance is truly the work of a
dedicated actor.
As for his eclectic group of co-stars; each have done excellent work in other projects
- but none are suited for an adventure film like "Anaconda".
The hodge-podge assembly would have been better led by someone like Sylvester Stallone or
Brendan Frasier.
Instead, we're stuck with Jennifer Lopez, Ice Cube, Eric Stoltz, Jonathan Hyde, Owen
Wilson, and Danny Trejo - who may very be the most grossly miscast players in the history
of film.
None of their character profiles are believable; Lopez is supposed to be a film director, Ice
Cube as her stalwart cameraman, or Stoltz as an Amazonian anthropologist?
Only Hyde's portrayal of a prim and proper Englishmen feels authentic.
Considering most of the action takes place on an ugly boat in nondescript jungle rivers,
the cinematography manages to keep things interesting without getting too claustrophobic.
The orchestral themes from Randy Edelman sometimes elicit discomfort during the scarier scenes,
but often feel out-of-place with the darker, PG-13 rated material.
A combination of convincing animatronics, practical effects, and CGI help create the
titular snake - whose slimy appearance and ferocious speed make for one scary monster.
The same cannot be said for the movie's sequels; as the slithering creatures look less and
less realistic with each passing entry.
This picture is a weird experience.
It's objectively quite terrible, but also consistently entertaining.
Technically speaking, it's a reasonably competent production with all the trappings of a major
Hollywood release - but the script, acting, and narrative are all completely dumb.
This conflicting identity may be why the film was nominated for, but lost, all six of its
Razzie awards.
A paradoxically enjoyable entry in the creature-feature genre, "Anaconda" is a must-see cluster of
campy characters and fun action.
And it's also tonight's featured review - so here's what you had to say about it.
Despite its obvious faults, you were favorable to "Anaconda", with the Movie Night audience
rating an average of SEVEN out of ten.
Personally, I thought it was just ALRIGHT.
Now for a review of the first sequel, "Anacondas: Hunt For The Blood Orchid".
A day late and a dollar short.
Seven years after everyone forgot about the mediocre original, Screen Gems decided to
sink $20 million dollars into this even more forgettable sequel.
But somehow, this adventure horror film directed by Dwight H. Little managed to more than triple
its budget after premiering in August of 2004.
The only elements that made "Anaconda" slightly redeemable were Jon Voight's manic performance,
and cool special effects.
So, naturally - when constructing the sequel, this movie's *seven* writers instead copied
the first movie's boneheaded screenplay and moronic character development.
Beat for beat, the 97-minute film shares the same stupid premise: a group of well-to-do
Americans venture deep into the tropical jungles of Borneo to look for the titular flower,
before a hostile character they picked up along the way double-crosses them.
And of course, giant snakes hunt them at every turn.
The predominant theme in this franchise seems to be that humans are more vicious than snakes
- and keeping with that tradition, Matthew Marsden does solid work as the treacherous
antagonist who betrays everyone for personal gain.
Morris Chestnut, KaDee Strickland, and the rest of the TV-talent are nothing more than
hors d'oeuvres for the hungry man-eating reptiles.
None of them are unique, memorable, or even interesting - but watching them get crushed
and eaten alive does provide for some fleeting thrills.
With component visuals, satisfying deaths, and a fast-paced narrative, this PG-13 rated
project is honestly far better than it needs to be.
But it's also exactly as stupid as you'd expect - but then again, that's why we watch these
types of films; for mindless 'shut-your-brain-off' amusement.
You might forget the experience within a few hours, but you won't necessarily regret it.
"Anacondas: Hunt For The Blood Orchid" is dumb, forgettable fun - and a MEH flick.
Third tonight, "Anaconda 3: Offspring".
Borderline awful.
This discount "Deep Blue Sea" knock-off was released as a SyFy original TV-movie in 2008,
and loosely ties into the — and I can't believe I'm even saying this —established
"Anaconda" universe.
Directed by Don E. FauntLeRoy, the entire adventure-horror film is an exercise in exploitation.
The 91-minute creature feature is cheaper than the Wal-Mart bargain bin it now lives
in... and what little money SyFy did have, they used to secure Baywatch's David Hasselhoff.
But sadly, they could only afford a few days of his time, which is why all of his scenes
take place in generally the same area... while wearing generally the same clothes; as the
story repeatedly making excuses to exclude him from a vast majority of the action.
Missing from nearly every key scene, The Hoff is always 'running late', or 'with the other
team'.
Despite receiving top-billing, he's nowhere to be found.
But when he is on screen, he's easily the most entertaining aspect of the R-rated movie.
Ten years ago, Hasselhoff was better known for an infamous drunk hamburger video rather
than his acting ability... but compared to the theater-school drop outs around him?
He looks like a career veteran of Shakespearean theater.
At least lead heroine Crystal Allen is pretty cute in her tight tank top though, so "Offspring"
has that going for itself, which is nice.
Everyone else, including a angry performance from John Rhys-Davies, is relegated to hapless
walking-lunch for the titular monsters.
But this time around they've gained a new ability: piercing people with their barbed
tails!
Speaking of the snakes, they lack any subtly or realism, and showcase some of most laughably
bad computer effects of the 21st century - the giant 60-foot snakes look like goofy cartoon
lizards; and are far worse than their counterparts in the 1997 original.
The decline in quality of these crucial effects-shots over the intervening 11-years is aggressively
terrible - it's like if you watched the "Star Wars" films in episodic order... but magnitudes
worse.
"Anaconda 3: Offspring" is a lazy and hackneyed experience that provides just enough stupidly
fun moments to be tolerable.
I thought it was BAD.
Finally tonight, let's review "Anaconda 4: Trail Of Blood".
Geez, where do you even begin with a picture this inept?
The unneeded fourth installment from a franchise that just doesn't know when to quit premiered
on the SyFy Channel on February 28, 2009.
This time around, giant man-eating snakes — which now have the ability to regenerate
when injured — are terrorizing a bunch of hopeless meatbags wandering the Romanian woods.
The unimaginative 89-minute script is a direct-sequel to "The Offspring", with the occasionally-capable
Crystal Allen returning to lead duties.
With a tight black tank top and pistols strapped to both hips, she certainly has the 'look'
of a sexy action hero - but everyone else is a downright embarrassment.
The made-for-TV script is so pedestrian and silly though, I doubt if even Meryl Streep
could make it work.
John Rhys-Davies returns as well, as the dying mogul desperate to obtain a MacGuffin serum
to prolonged his life.
Featured only briefly in bookend segments, his entire performance amounts to little more
than posturing and expositional monologues.
Eight minutes into the R-rated film, after a predictable "scientist gets eaten by his
lab-experiment" cold-open, the film cuts to its primary establishing shot.
It's our first proper introduction to the setting where we'll be spending the remainder
of the run-time.
And yet, this 10-foot crane shot of a jeep pulling into a thinly crowded forest is perfectly
emblematic of "Trail Of Blood's" many issues.
For starters, giant anacondas don't live in the forest.
Secondly, Arial font in plain white?
Come on, guys - at least show some imagination with your titles.
Moreover, are we actually meant to believe this clearly flat area is the "Carpathian
Mountains"?
Third, is this really the most invocative shot director Don E. FauntLeRoy could come
up with?
A slow-moving crane shot beneath the treeline of a nondescript forest in Eastern Europe?
It provides no sense of scale, excitement, or — most importantly — geography!
The key tenant of an establishing shot, as its name would suggest, is to establish where
the action will take place.
And you know what other movies are filmed entirely on-location in Romania?
Steven Seagal's direct-to-video work.
Not a trait you want to share.
I've spent a fair amount of time complaining about a single shot early in the film, and
there's a reason for that; when your locations are uninteresting and the compositions un-engaging,
your audience is going to check out.
After only 500 seconds, I was mentally disconnected from this picture.
Worse still, the one alluring aspect of these types of low-budget creature-features; dumb
characters getting eaten alive by scary monsters - simply isn't satisfying in the slightest.
Frequent cutaways to disemboweled bodies and animal carcasses are sprinkled throughout
in attempt to gross-out the audience into paying attention again, but it never works.
Conversations are littered with random and unnecessary extreme close-ups.
While the computer-rendered 30' snakes look like a cartoon screensaver pasted on top of
the frame.
The music is nothing but bland, pre-composed royalty free tracks; and not even the stuff
you'd have to pay for.
I've literally spent more money scoring my YouTube videos than SyFy did on this crap.
And speaking of audio, what's with the sound effects?
The titular creatures literally growl like tigers and squeal like wounded pigs.
Least I remind this film's brain-dead writer: snakes don't have vocal cords!
This franchise began as a shameless guilty pleasure, and has only sunk deeper with each
regrettable installment.
And while previous entries benefited, however ironically, from their scenery-chewing villains
like Jon Voight or David Hasselhoff; "Trail Of Blood" has none of that, and is irredeemably
flat.
A boring, poorly-made slog, "Anaconda 4" is cinematic GARBAGE.
But hey, at least we can enjoy this hilarious freeze-frame of one of the dumb mercenaries,
mid-tackle.
The fifth and final entry in the "Anaconda" series is actually a cross-over with the "Lake
Placid" series, so we'll be saving that for the next episode... when we review all of
the entries in that similarly terrible franchise.
Until then, please click this information-icon if to watch some related videos.
My name is Jonathan Paula, thanks for watching and have a good Movie Night!
-------------------------------------------
M. Asam 4piece Mask Set - Duration: 7:31.
For more infomation >> M. Asam 4piece Mask Set - Duration: 7:31. -------------------------------------------
M. Asam VINOLIFT Neck Dcollet Cream Duo - Duration: 6:38.
For more infomation >> M. Asam VINOLIFT Neck Dcollet Cream Duo - Duration: 6:38. -------------------------------------------
PAST - Hitler - Duration: 4:14.
PAST
People Are Sometimes Terrible
He's literally Hitler
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét